Loading...
Resolution - 9583RESOLUTION NO. 9583 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATES, DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN; ORDERING CERTAIN LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ELECTRICAL CURRENT TO BE FURNISHED FOR LIGHTING FIXTURES AND TO ORDER CERTAIN STREET TREES TO BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED FOR FISCAL YEARS BEGINNING JULY 1, 1998. WEST COVINA CITYWIDE LIGHTING AND MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (COMMENCING FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of West Covina, California pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" and Proposition 218, required a State certified Engineer of said City to make and file a report in writing, presenting certain matters related to the confirmation of the annual assessments in the Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District 1998-1999 and following, as contemplated under the provisions of said Act and Proposition; and WHEREAS, a State certified Engineer, pursuant to such requirements, did make and file such report; and WHEREAS, the City Council preliminarily approved the report on April 7, 1998 and declared its intention to order certain street lighting fixtures and appurtenances to be installed and maintained and electric current to be furnished for lighting fixtures and to order certain street trees to be installed and maintained for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1998 and following; and WHEREAS, the City Council fixed Tuesday June 16, 1998, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. of said day as the time for a public hearing to hear protests at the Council Chamber in the City Hall, 1444 West Garvey Avenue, in the City of West Covina, California; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the City Council does hereby approve, confirm and adopt the Engineer's report dated April 7, 1998, and does hereby approve and confirm the assessments proposed for said proposed improvements as set forth and referred to in said report, which said report is now on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, open to inspection, hereby referred to and made a part here of; and said City Council does hereby also confirm and adopt the respective instruments therein contained and designated therein as SPECIFICATIONS, DIAGRAM AND PLANS, Estimate of Costs and Assessments, all of which , on file as aforesaid, are hereby incorporated herein and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That said Council does hereby order the said contemplated improvement to be made in accordance with the said PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS therefor, so adopted and approved, and does order the determine that the fiscal years • referred to in said Resolution of Intent No. 9554 shall be and the same are hereby fixed and established as the period commencing on the 1st day of July 1998, as therein set forth; and said Council does hereby levy the said proposed total assessment made to cover the costs and expenses of said improvement upon the respective several subdivisions of land in the assessment district described in said Resolution of Intention No. 9554 and fixed and determined by said report, proposed assessment, filed therewith. • • SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby orders and directs the City Treasurer or others to establish a special fund entitled "West Covina Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District" and place into said Fund all payments of assessments received from the County Tax Collector and payments shall be made out of said special fund only for the purpose set out in the Engineer's report. SECTION 4. That the levy and collection of the assessment is.statutorily exempt from CEQA as it is for operating expenses and equipment and supplies. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk of the said City is hereby ordered to transmit, or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of Los Angeles County. State of California, the Diagram and Assessments upon which such levy is based, and the County Tax Collector of said County (who is also the City Tax Collector for said City) is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, ordered and directed to make collection of all assessments shown in said Assessment and to perform the acts and duties as required by law of and to performed by the officer, employee, or person so designated. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of Junp, 1998 ATTESTED: U City Clerk I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of June 1998, by the following vote of the Council, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Herfert, Howard, Touhey, Nelendez Councilmembers: None Councilmembers: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney YAWord FilesWIDlPubHearCWMaintDist.doc Wong City Cler • ATTACHMENT "B" PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 CITY OF WEST COVINA CITYWIDE LIGHTING AND MAINTENANCE DISTRICT April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 Report Part A - Plans and Specifications..............................................................3 Part B - Estimate of Costs Part C - Assessment Rolls................................................................5 Part D - Method of Apportionment................................................5 Summary of Assessments Part E - Property Owners List.........................................................12 Part F - Assessment Diagram.........................................................12 • April7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District CITY OF WEST COVINA ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUNANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XH D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, Article XIof the California Constitution and in accordance with the Resolution of Intention adopted by the City Council of the City of West Covina, State of California, in connection with proceedings for: CITY OF WEST COVINA LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District" or "District", I, Thomas M. Mayer, P.E., the Acting City Engineer of the City of West Covina, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows: PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and incorporated herein by reference. PART B ESTIMATE OF COST An estimate of the costs of the proposed improvements, including incidental cost and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. PART C ASSESSMENT ROLLS An assessment of the estimate cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the net amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. The Assessment Roll is filed in the Office of the City Clerk and by reference is made a part hereof. • PART E PROPERTY OWNER LIST A list of names and addresses of the owners of real property within the Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles. The list is keyed to the records of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles, which are incorporated herein by reference. 1 April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District PART F ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is on file in the Office of the City Engineer and incorporated herein by reference. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles for fiscal year to which this Report applies. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. C� April7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of West Covina, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be serviced and maintained as generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITY OF WEST COVINA CITYWIDE LIGHTING AND MAINTENANCE DISTRICT The existing facilities to be maintained and serviced include street lighting facilities and street trees. The District will fund the costs in connection with the District maintenance and servicing including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory operation of these facilities. Reference is made to Part "D" of this report for a discussion of the Zones of Benefit and the facilities associated with them, which are serviced and maintained. The facilities are described as follows: Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities Facilities include but are not limited to: trees, irrigation system, hardscape, fixtures, sidewalk maintenance resulting from landscape growth and appurtenant facilities, in public rights -of way, parkways, and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. Lighting and Appurtenant Facilities Facilities include but are not limited to: poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, conductors, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as required to provide lighting in the Public rights -of -way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. The public lighting system shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination. Electricity for street lights shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company, and it shall be adequate for the intended purpose. Rates for power shall be those authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping and the maintenance of any of the public lighting facilities and furnishing of electrical energy for the public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. The Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are by reference herein made a part of this report. 3 April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District PART B ESTIMATE OF COST The City's budget for the operation and services costs, shown below, detail the estimated costs and fund balances for Fiscal Year 1998-99 as available at the time of preparation of this report. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost can be recovered in the assessment spread including incidental expenses. The latter can include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with the district proceedings. Expenditures Estimated expenditures for maintenance and operation for Fiscal Year 1998-99 are as follows: LIGHTING Direct Lighting $829,200 Zone A $ 49,243 Zone $ 3,937 Total $ 882,380 STREET TREES Direct Trees $284,900 Total $ 284,900 TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET $1,167,280 CONTINGENCY AND RESERVES Cash Flow $105, 353 Total $ 105,353 TOTAL DISTRICT EXPENDITURES $1,272,633 Revenues Projected revenues available to the District for Fiscal Year 1998-99 are as follows: I. Assessment Income $1,167,287 TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUE $1,167,287 FUND BALANCE (Reserves from Prior Year) 105.346 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $1,272,633 The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenue and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1" must be carried over to the next fiscal year. 4 April7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL The proposed assessment, commencing with for Fiscal Year 1998-99, and amount of assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor's Office, are contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of West Covina, which is incorporated herein by reference. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report. The proposed assessment is a multi -year assessment. The amount of the assessment commences in 1998-99 and if adopted will be kept at the same level each year, with only a CPI increase annually. The assessment will be levied at such amount until terminated by the City Council or voters or increased by the same ballot procedure. Because there has been no legislation, which clarifies the relationship with Proposition 218 and the 1972 Act, it is unclear what procedure, if any will be required for annual confirmation of the assessment. In any case, the assessment roll will be updated annually, after the lien date, to reflect newly developed properties. PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT GENERAL Part 2 of Division 15 of the Street and Highway Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment district by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals, landscaping and park and recreational facilities. Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather that according to assessed value. This section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The Act permits the designation of zones of benefits within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variation in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." 0, In addition, Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which was approved on the November 1996 Statewide Ballot, requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Prop. 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. WI April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the cost of the operation, servicing and maintenance of street trees and street lighting and appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services. EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Since the assessments will be levied against parcels of property as shown on the tax rolls, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be spread just by parcel, not considering land use or parcel size, a single family parcel would be paying the same as a 50 unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment in a similar zone and this would not be equitable and would not satisfy the Prop. 218 requirements. The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessment since it represents over 80% of the parcels in the City. Therefore, the single- family residential parcel is defined as on Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to calculate the EDU's for other residential land uses and for non- residential parcels. Every land -use is converted to EDU's: Parcels containing apartments are converted to EDU's based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel of land; commercial and industrial parcels are converted based on the lot size of each parcel of land. The EDU method is usually seen as more appropriate and equitable for landscaping and lighting districts, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements being maintained extends beyond the front of their property. Therefore, assessments as apportioned as a function of land -use type and whether a property is developed or not. This may be more clearly shown by taldng an example of condominiums. Under the current method of assessment, the frontage along the whole condominium complex is measured, and then is divided by the number of units within the complex. This spreads a relatively small assessment to each of the condominiums which is not commensurate with the benefit each one of them receives. Single Family Residential. The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessment. The basic unit shall be called an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Parcels zoned for single family residential uses are assessed 1 EDU. Multiple Family Residential. Multiple residential (including condominiums) land use equivalencies are determined based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel. Due to population density and size of structure relative to the typical single family residence, each dwelling unit defined as multi -family residential, including condominiums, would be 0.75 EDU. Benefits to a multi -family residential property do not increase proportionately as the number of units increase. Therefore, the population per unit decreases as the residential land use density increases and there is a corresponding reduction in benefit to a parcel. Also, as the number of dwelling units increase, the average value per rental unit decreases. Therefore, there is a reduced benefit to a parcel as the number of dwelling units increase. By decreasing the equivalency as the number of units increase, a reasonable benefit assessment is achieved. Therefore, the equivalency is reduced to OS EDU per dwelling unit, for 5 through 15 dwelling units (as parcels with 5 to 15 units are considered "high medium density" as opposed to the "low density" of duplexes, triplexes and four- plexes), and the equivalency is reduced to 0.25 EDU per dwelling unit for more than 15 units, which are considered to be "high density". 15 units is established as the limit of the "high medium density" category as State law (California Title 25, Section 42) requires that apartment complexes with 16 or more dwelling units have a manager located on the premises, which is an indication of "high density". 0 April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District Mobile Homes. Mobile home parks, and mobile homes located within mobile home parks, are converted to EDU's based on the population density and size of structure relative to a single family residence. Therefore, mobile home parks and mobile homes located within mobile home parks would be assessed OS EDU per mobile home. No decrease would be applied to this factor, as mobile homes are all separate dwelling with no common walls. Non -Residential. In converting improved non-residential properties to EDU's, the factor used is the City of West Covina's average density for single family residential areas, which is 5 dwelling units per acre. All properties that developed for non- residential uses are therefore assigned 5 EDU's per acre for the first 5 acres. It is our experience, based upon a review of large non-residential parcels, that the utilization of that portion of non-residential property greater than 5 acres mare closely resembles that of vacant land as it is typically undeveloped. Therefore, after the first 5 acres, each additional acre will be charge 25% of 5 EDU's which results in 1.25 EDU's per acre, similar to vacant land as described below. Vacant Property: Vacant property is described, as parcels with no improved structures. These properties receive benefits based on their land, as this is the basis of their value. Based on the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of the property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property, and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of 0. Therefore, it is recommended that vacant property be assessed at the rate of 25 percent of improved property. Vacant Residential, parcels defined as residential parcels, which do not have structures on the parcels, are assessed 25 % of the parcel with a single family dwelling thereon. The parcel will be assessed 0.25 EDU per parcel. Vacant Non -Residential, parcels defined as parcels which are not residential parcels and which do not have structures on the parcel area assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. The parcels will be assessed at the rate of 25 % of the developed non-residential properties, or 136125 EDU per acre or any portion thereof, with a minimum of 0.25 EDU per parcel and up to a maximum of 5 acres (6.80625 EDU's) per parcel, as parcels over 5 acres may be considered as open space, and no longer receive any benefit. Public Property. article XIIID of the California Constitution requires that all benefiting public properties be assessed for their fair share of the benefit. Public property which is developed and used for residential or business purposes will be assessed the same as private property with the same use. Schools will be assessed as Commercial/Industrial uses. Parks will be assessed as vacant property. Exempt. Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements, and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts, parkways and that portion of property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private is commercial, industrial and institutional activities. Also excepted from assessments would be utility rights -of -way, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), landlocked parcels and small parcels vacated by the City as these parcels have little or no value and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. 7 April7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District 4- The land use classification for each parcel has been based on the Los Angeles County Assessor's Roll. EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT (EDU) FORMULA LAND USE BASIC UNIT X EDU FACTOR EDU RATES Single Family Res. SFR D.U. X 1.0 1 EDU/DU Condominiums D.U. X 0.7 0.75 EDU/DU Multi -Family Res. D.U. X 0.7 0.75 EDU/DU for the first 4 units 0.5 OS EDU/DU for each add'I units over 4 and up to 15 0.2 0.25 EDU/DU for each add'1 units over 15 Mobile Home Parks D.U. X 0.5 OS EDU/DU Commercial/Industrial and Acre X 5.0 5.0 EDU/Acre Other Non -Residential for the first 5 acres (including Schools) 1.2 1.25 EDU/Acre for each add'1 acre over 5 acres Vacant SFR D.U. X 0.2 025 EDU/DU Vacant Acre X 1.2 125 EDU/Acre (25 % of Non -Res. EDU's) 5 acre maximum includes Parks DU = Dwelling Unit SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS BENEFIT FACTORS There are varying levels of benefit to property from the operation and maintenance of street lighting and street trees based on the different types of property use. Because the benefit to the property varies depending on the type of land use of the property, a Benefit Factor is applied to the EDU formula for each property for each type of improvement to obtain Benefit Units for each Property. (Equivalent Dwelling Unit) x (Benefit Factor) = Benefit Units STREET LIGHTING BENEFIT Proper maintenance and operation of the street lighting system benefits in proximity adjacent to the lights by providing security, safety and community character and vitality. The amount of benefit received will vary with the different land use on the property. There are three categories from which the total special benefit of a parcel is derived: 1, Security and Safety Benefit. The prevention of crime, the alleviation of the fear of crime, and the prevention of traffic accidents in a community. 2. Community Character and Vitality Benefit. The promotion of social interaction, promotion of business and industry, and the contribution to a positive night time visual image for the community. 3. Lighting Intensity Benefit. As the lighting levels increase, so do the benefits associated with the lighting. Lighting Standards usually require approximately twice the level of lighting in commercial/industrial areas than in residential areas. April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District Parcels, which are located on streets with street lights, receive a special lighting benefit. Parcels which are located on private streets receive a substantially reduced benefit from local lighting, parcel which do not have any local street lights receive no benefit from Street Lighting Lighting at the street intersection, which is defined as safety lighting, is considered to be the minimum lighting requirement for vehicular safety;. therefore, safety lighting represents the general benefit portion of street lighting. Additionally, lights, which are on arterials of the City, which do not have parcels fronting on them, are considered a general benefit. Those general benefit portions of the City's lighting budget will not be assessed. The following table outlines the Benefit Factors for street lighting; STREET LIGMNG BENEFIT FACTORS Residential Commercial/Industrial Security & Safety 1.0 1.0 Community Character & Vitality 1.0 1.0 Lighting Intensity 1.0 2.0 Total 3.0 4.0 Schools will receive a residential benefit factor, as they tend to be in residential areas and benefit similarly to residential property. Parks are assessed as vacant land and receive a residential benefit factor. Benefit Zones. Most parcels within the City front on streets with street lights and therefore receive a direct lighting benefit. However, there are some areas in the City which have a higher level of lighting and these have been designated as additional Benefit Zones. A. The Civic Center and Plaza At West Covina areas receive a higher level of street lighting. B. The properties along Glendora Avenue from Lakes Drive to the Freeway receive a higher level of street lighting than Zone A. Those parcels which also have public lighting in adjacent alleyways receive an equal amount of benefit for the alley lights as for the street lights, therefore, these parcels are assessed two times the benefit of the basic local lighting. Those parcel which front streets without 'street lights do not receive a local lighting benefit and therefore are not assessed. The Following table provides a preliminary summary of Street Lighting Benefit Units (BU's) for the City. Land Use Parcels Dwellings Acres EDU's Benefit Factor Benefit Units Single Family Res. 21,171 21,171 21 171.000 3 61,335.000 Condominium 2,262 2,262 1,696.500 3 6,756.750 Multi-Fanifly Res. 475 7,282 2,856.000 3 8,595.750 Mobile Home Parks 2 265 132.500 3 397.500 Commercial/Industrial 463 796.457 3,085.629 4 12 342.516 Schools 27 1 295.933 828.077 3 2,484.231 Vacant SFR lot 634 158.500 3 475.500 Vacant- Parks 19 141.459 84.510 3 253.530 Vacant Non-SFR 285 895.844 405.755 4 1,387.851 Totals 25,338 30,980 1,037.303 30,418.471 94,028.628 The total budget for basic lighting is $825,651, therefore the preliminary basic lighting assessment rate is estimated at $8.78 per BU. Therefore, a single family residential parcel's assessment would equal 3 BU x $8.78/BU = $26.34 0 April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District • Lighting Benefit Zone A: The total estimated budget for the Zone lighting is $47,830, therefore the preliminary basic lighting assessment rate is estimated at $26.67 per BU. The following table shows the preliminary summary of the BU's in Zone A: Land Use Parcels Acreage EDU's Benefit Factor Benefit Units Commercial/Industrial 67 105,675 427.351 4 1,709.404 Vacant Non-SFR 14 31,709 21.063 4 84.252 Totals 81 137,384 448.414 1,793.656 Liebting Benefit Zone B: The budget for Zone B lighting is $3,824 and is additional to the budget for Zone A. Therefore, the preliminary basic lighting assessment rate is estimated at $15.51 per BU plus $26.67 per BU for Zone A, for a total assessment rate of $42.18 per BU. The following table shows the preliminary summary of the BU's in Zone B: Land Use Parcels Acreage EDU's Benefit Factor Benefit Units Commercial/industrial 24 10.994 54.92 4 219.680 Vacant Non-SFR 5 5.357 6.698 4 26.792 Totals 29 16.351 61.618 246.472 Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings. The City maintains street trees throughout the City. The trees are located within the public rights -of -way and provide aesthetically pleasing environment, shade, beautification, and according to some authorities air purification and sound attenuation. These positive attributes increase the desirability of properties located on streets which have trees on them. More importantly, proper maintenance of these facilities, especially routine trimming of street trees and removal/replacement of deceased trees, is essential to the safety.of the users of adjacent properties. Parcels which are located on streets which do not have trees do not benefit and are not assessed. Street trees on arterials of the City that do not have parcels fronting on them are considered a general benefit. There are approximately 963 such trees out of approximately 29,500 street trees in the City, or 3.26%. Therefore, 3.26% of the City street tree budget will not be assessed. No additional factors have been assigned for street trees; therefore, the Benefit Unit factors are the same as the EDU factors for each land use. The Following table provides a preliminary summary of Street Tree Benefit Units (BU's) for the City. Land Use Parcels Dwellings Acres EDU's Benefit Factor Benefit Units Single Family Res. 17,628 17,628 17 628.000 1 17,628.000 Condominium 284 284 213.000 1 213.000 Multi -Family Res. 218 6,040 2,156.250 1 2,156.250 Mobile Home Parks 1 108 54.000 1 54.000 Commercial/Industrial includin Schools 551 1,129.059 4,190.164 1 4,190.164 Vacant SFR lot 307 1 176.194 76.750 1 76.750 Vacant Non-SFR (including Parks 188 J 920.585 342.935 1 342.935 Totals 19,177 24,060 1 2,225.838 24,661.099 24.661.099 10 April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District The Street Tree budget proposed to be assessed is $298,378. Based on this amount, the preliminary assessment rate is estimated at $12.10 per BU. Therefore, a single family residential parcel's assessment would equal to 1 BU x $12.10/BU = $12.10 ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY . The base assessment rate which may be levied for each BU may be increased by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside areas in any fiscal year by City Council approval each year. The base assessment rate will be that rate as approved and noticed for Fiscal Year 1997-98. The following table summarizes the assessment amounts for parcels in each of the zones of benefits: ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY Benefit Cateeory Rate per Benefit Unit Basic Local Lighting $ 8.78 per BU Light Zone A $26.67 per BU Light Zone B $42.18 per BU Street Tree Benefit $12.10 per BU $19.76 Mobile Home PM & Trees $28.83 ILights & Trees $19.22 / du $6.59 & Trees $9.61 $175.60/ac up to 5 ac $ 43.90/ac each add'l ac & Trees $236.10/ac up to 5 ac $ 59.03/ac each add'l ac - A & Tree $593.90/ac up to 5 ac $148.48/ac each add'l ac - B & Tree $904.10/ac up to 5 ac $226.03/ac each add'1 ac ac = acre du = is $131.70/ac up to 5 ac $ 32.93 each add'1 ac & Trees $313.20/ac up to 5 ac $ 78.30 each add'1 ac $ 43.90/ac up to 5 ac $219.50 max & Trees $ 59.03/ac up to 5 ac $295.13 max - A & Tree $148.48/ac up to 5 ac $742.38 max - B & Tree $ 226.03/ac up to 5 ac $1,130.13 max 11 April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District s PART E PROPERTY OWNERS LIST The property owners list with the names and addresses of each property owner of each lot or parcel, as shown on the Assessment Diagram referenced in Part F herein, is the list of property owners within the District Boundaries as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles and is, by reference, made part of this report. PART F ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the Assessment District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles and are, by reference, made part of this report. 12 April 7, 1998 Citywide Lighting and Maintenance District ENGINEER' S REPORT CITY OF WEST COVINA CITYWIDE LIGHTING AND MAINTENANCE DISTRICT The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report directed by the City Council. The undersigned certifies that he or she is a professional Engineer, registered in the State of California. Dated: ��' ��� Thomas M. Mayer, Acting City Engineer/Public Works Director I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed in the Office of the City Clerk on the 17th day of June , 1998. City Clerk, City of Wgftovina County of Los Angeles, California_. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, on the 16th day of June 1998. U City Clerk City of W qt Covina County of Los Angeles, Califs iia': I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Roll was :fled with'the County Auditor of the County of Los Angeles, on /_ day of 1998. City Clerk, City of WA,61 Covina County of Los AngqVs, Californi 0