Loading...
12-23-1957 - Regular Meeting - Minutesf- 'imp MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF WEST COVINA9 CALIFORNIA December 23, 1957 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kay at 8.10 P.M. in the West Covina; City Hall. The invocation was given by Rabbi Silverstein of the Citrus Valley Jewish Center. ROLL CALL Present. Mayor Kay, Councilmen Barnes, Browng Mottinger, Pittenger Others Presents City Manager, City Clerk, City Treasurer, City Attorney, City Engineer, Planning Commission Secretary, Public Works Director. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - December 99 1957 A correction was made in the Minutes on Page 27, the last paragraph, for the . motion to be completed as follows "be authorized to -sign the agreement." The Minutes were approved as corrected. SCHEDULED MATTERS AWARD OF BIDS o Held over from City Council meeting of November 25, 1957. 1) TWO FORDOR SEDANS � For City Engineer and City Manager Motion by Councilman Browns seconded by Councilman Mottinger, and carried that the bids on the two (2) Fordor Sedans be rejected and that all the bid bonds be returned to the various bidders. 2) 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCK (For Street Dept.) Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Pittenger that the bid on the 1/2 Ton Pick -Up Truck for the Street Department be awarded to Clippenger Chevrolet, as the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $1,713.77 plus tax, (and all other bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders) Motion passed on roll call as follows° Ayes. Councilmen Barnes, Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes s . None Absent,. None 3) 1-1/2 TON TRUCK CAB AND CHASSIS (Park Dept.) Motion by Councilman Mottinger, seconded by Councilman Brown and carried that the bids on the 1-1/2 Ton Truck Cab and Chassis be rejected and that all the bid bonds be returned to the various bidders. 1 • C. C. 12-23-57 Page two Award of bids 4) 1/2 YARD TRUCK LOADER (Street Dept.) Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Pittenger and carried that the bids on the 1/2 Yard Truck Loader be rejected and that all the bid bonds be returned to the various bidderso 5) DUMP TRUCK WITH FRO NT-E ND LOADER (Street Dept.) Motion by Councilman Mottinger, seconded by Councilman Pittenger that the bid be awarded to the International Harvester Company, as the lowest responsible bidder, for a Model AC-184 Dump Truck with Front -End Loader installed, in the amount of $9.,114.86 (including tax) (and that all other bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders). Motion passed on roll call as follows. Ayes. Councilmen Barnes, Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes . None Absent. None 6) TWO TON TRUCK CAB AND CHASSIS (Park Dept.) • Motion by Councilman Mottinger, seconded by Councilman Barnes that the bid on the Two Ton Truck Cab and Chassis for the Park Department be awarded to the International Harvester Company, as the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $29291.67 (including tax), and that all other bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. Motion passed on roll call as`follows. • Ayes. Councilmen Barnes, Noes. None Absent. None 7) 2-1/2 TON TRUCK CAB AND CHASSIS Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger., Mayor Kay (Street Dept.) Motion by Councilman Pittenger, seconded by Councilman Brown and carried that the bids on the 2-1/2 Ton Truck Cab and Chassis for the Street Dept, be rejected and that all the bid bonds be returned to the various bidders. 8) BRUSH CHIPPER (12 INCH BLADE) (Park Dept.) Motion by Councilman Pittenger, seconded by Councilman Brown and carried that the bids on the Brush Chipper (12 Inch Blade) for the Park Dept. be rejected and that all the bid bonds be returned to the various bidders. 9) BRUSH CHIPPER (15 INCH BLADE) (Park Dept.) Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes that the bid on the Brush Chipper (15 Inch Blade) for the Park Dept. be awarded to the Agricultural Machinery Company, their Model No. 272 -.8 Cylinder., as the fflpm 0 C. C. 12-23-57 Page three Award of bids - continued lowest responsible bidder in the amount of $�,542.24 (including tax) (.and all other bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders). Motion passed on roll call as follows• Ayes. Councilmen Barnes, Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes: None Absent. None PROJECT C-64 Street improvements on a section of Vine Avenue STREET IMPROVEMENTS from 160 feet east of Hillward Avenue to Hollenbeck BID AWARDED Street. Improvements to'consist of excavation, • Harvey Construction Co. removal of existing paving where required, grading,, curb and gutter removal, curb and gutter construction and the construction of 2" plant mixed surfacing on untreated base, and all incidental work thereto. The bids were opened as advertised at 10.06 A.M., December 23, 1957, in the office of the City Clerk and referred to the City Engineer for recommendation to the City Council at this meeting. The City Engineer reported that the result of • bids were as follows. Crowell & Larson 10% Bid Bond $6,752.75 Griffith Company $600.00 Bid Bond 5,961.25 Harvey Constr. Co. $550.00 Cashier's Check 5,41.7.70 • William Kirkland 10% Bid Bond 8,084.00 W. E. McKnight Constr. Co. 10% Bid Bond 5,803.20 Warren Southwest Co. 10% Bid Bond 62175.65 City Engineer. Of the six bids received for this particular project the lowest responsible bidder was the Harvey Construction Company and I would recommend the award of the bid be made to this Company on the basis of the low bid in the amount of $55417.70. Upon the recommendation of the City Engineer, motion by Councilman Brown seconded by Councilman Barnes that the award of the bid on Project C-64, Street Improvements on a section of Vine Avenue from 160 feet east of Hillward Avenue to Hollenbeck Street go to Harvey Construction Co. as the lowest responsible • bidder in the amount of $5,417.70 (with all other bid bonds returned to the unsuccessful bidders). Motion passed on roll call as follows. Ayes. Councilmen Barnes, Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes . None Absent. None _ 3 m 0 C. C. 12-23-57 Page four PUBLIC HEARINGS ZONE VARIANCE NO. 223 LOCATION° West side of Irwindale Avenue, William H. & Rosalie Lockett between Workman Avenue and Rowland Avenue. REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMM. REQUEST: Multiple dwelling use in an R-A Zone. EXISTING ZONE: R-A Denied by the Planning Commission at their meeting of November 61, 1957. De- cision of the Planning Commission appealed by letter from the applicant. Maps were presented by the City Engineer and Resolution No. 550 of the Plan- ning commission, denying this Zone Variance was read. • The Recommendations of the City Engineer are as follows. 1) That all street improvements outlined in Section 49, Ordinance No. 225, including utilities be installed accordingly and meet the approval of the City Engineer. This to include street lights, sidewalks and sanitary sewers. • 2) That all necessary street widening of Irwindale Avenue shall be deeded to the City of West Covina. 3) That adequate water supply and fire protection be provided as required by Ord. No. 237 and Ord. No. 451. 4) That all excavating and grading work conform to provisions of Ord.'No. 384. • 5) That all bonds, fees and deposits for improvements be posted before building permits are issued. 6) That a 6-foot masonry wall be constructed along the southerly and westerly property lines. 7) That provisions for 20 foot alley be made to connect with either Irwindale Avenue or Del Norte School parking.lot. Mayor Kay opened the public hearing and stated that all thos desiring to pre- sent testimony on this matter would please stand and be sworn in by the City Clerk. William Lockett, applicant, of 321 North Irwindale Avenue spoke in favor. The reason we appealed the decision of the Planning Commission was that we did not think that they actually understood the history of the property and the • unusual situation of the property;,' The property was purchased 8 years ago when West Covina was, more or less, of a rural city. Times have changed and now we have this piece of property with �4- • C. C. 12-23-57 Page five PUBLIC HEARINGS - continued a school right next to it. Mr. Lockettz The school has a parking lot that completely covers the. north side of our.property line. There is an alleyway that abutts up against our property which dead -ends there. This property was purchased for the subdivision before the alley was put in and at that time the City had no Planning Commission and there was nothing we could do about it at that time. The subdivision went in and and there we stood. The reason we have appealed is that we believe that such improvement of the property as we are re questing would be good, it is an eyesore as it now stands, • and it is also dangerous to the children that have to go to the school and a lot (of school children) come through our property rather than walk down the narrow roadway. It would be quite an improvement if the zoning is granted. The main reason for opposing was, it seemed to me at the time, the alley way, but there will only be 10 houses served by that alley and I can see no reason why that would hold up,the zoning. • Mr. D.. Copenhaver of 320 No. Hollow Avenue, West Covina, spoke in opposition and presented and read a petition signed by some 40 people protesting this variance. The petition stated the reasons in opposition to this as follows: 1) The existing alley between Irwindale and Hollow Avenues accommodates 10 garages and we feel the proposed garages, which would be using the same alley would overload this narrow alley. . 2) Irwindale and Workman Avenues would suffer an increased traffic load because of increased use of said alley. 3) We feel that multiple dwellings, for rental purposes, would put a commercial element into this residential vicinity. 4) It is also felt that multiple dwellings may be a detrimental factor on the resale of the surrounding homes. This petition in protest was accepted by the City Clerk to be filed for the record. The City Clerk presented and read a communication from Mr. and Mrs. Woodman of Corona Del Mar protesting this variance on the grounds it would be detrimental -to their property located at 1333 North Hollow Avenue and they requested this -not be approved. • There being no further testimony, the hearing was declared closed. -5- C� L� C. C. 12-23-57 ZV 223 m continued Councilman Pittenger: Planning Comm. Seely. Mayor Kayo Page six What is the size of that propertyg about 150 feet? The lot contains 272300 square feet and has a 125 foot frontage. Is there any way that access could be made along the north side of the property? Planning Comm. Secey: That is a parking lot for the school district. Mayor Kayo Can't there be a cul-de-sac? Planning Comm. Sec°yo That is a matter that has been studied and it would give very sub -standard lots in doing so. Councilman Mottinger: I believe there was some study in regard to reducing the number of residences to four and thus making the number of square feet per residence approximately that of R-1 zone. Planning Comm. Secey: That was in the Planning Department Remarks, allowing the same number of dwelling units allowed in an R-1 Zone. Mayor Kay: The only way you can do that is by a variance for Rm2 or R-3 purposes. Planning Comm. Seely.* You may allow variance for two dwellings on one lot on a hardship basis without changing the zoning. • Councilman Mottinger: It would seem that we would be serving the purpose of the area and not upsetting the balance of Area District I by accomplishing something like that I would be opposed to reducing the area with 5 residences on one lot. It seems as if the smaller amount would have some merit. Mayor Kay: You are proposing this be sub -divided into two lots with two residences on e ach.lot? Planning Comm. Secey: That is correct. Councilman Brown: What about access to Irwindale Avenue? Planning Comm. Seely: It was proposed in the recommendations of the City Engineer that provisions be made for a 20=foot alley to connect with either Irwindale Avenue or Del Norte School parking lot. We felt that would clear up any possible detrimental effects • that now exist and give a clear -access. Councilman Pittenger: If you did that you would leave him a little piece (of land) 20 x 50 on the side of the alley. e6e Co Co 12-23-57 Page seven ZV 223 - continued Planning Comm. Sec'y: It was suggested that this area be used for garages or to bend the alley and bring it up to Irwindale Avenue. One of the two. Councilman Pittenger: I think that we are going to have some pieces like this around the City., where old ranch houses have been left in the midst of subdivision and it does not seem fair that a man should take the whole piece of property and put one house on it. I think that some study should be made in regard to puttingfour houses on it. I do not think we could get five. I would make a motion that this be referred back to the Plan- ning Commission to see if something cant be worked out on that'basis. Council- man Brown seconded the motion of Councilman Pittenger and the motion carried unanimously. i GENERAL MATTERS ORAL COMMU NI CATI 0 NS TRACT NO. 21617 Mr. John G. Myers of 3704 Montezuma Avenue, Alhambra stated as follows: • I am here tonight on a matter affecting Tract No. 21617.. This tentative map of this tract was first approved in 1956 in January and at that time the tract con- tained some 30 acres. We submitted this tract map to the Commission and Council and had their approval of the subdivision. However,, in the meantime the Covina School District started condemnation proceedings and we finally wound up with 15 acres left, instead of the 30 acres originally submitted. At that time, after condemnation, we again submitted a revised subdivision map on the 15 acres and • this map was also approved by the Commission and Council both. In connection with the improvements in this tract we are concerned with the water shed of the flood control channel traversing across the property in a regular manner and entering the property at Cameron Avenue and leaving it at the northwest corner of the proposed subdivision. It then follows along the channel through to Cortez Street under Cortez Street and continuing to Cortez Park on Citrus Street and then into Walnut Creek Wash. In our original approval by Council and the Commission it was required that both sides of the relocated Wash,. and we planned at that time to relocate the Wash and have it follow lot lines as near as possible., be protected from erosion by construction of an approved double mesh fence revetment. That was our original approval and we have never submitted a design based on this approval because of the condemnations. However, we submitted a later map for 15 acres and there was some change in what we were required to do in so far as the channel was con- cerned in that on January 25, after the word revetment., the following phrase • was added., "or an equal facility, subject to the approval of the City Engineer." In October, 1956, after this condemnation was settled, we started to submit our drawings or designs for both the subdivision and this channel. That was some 070 • C. C. 12-23-57 Page eight TRACT NO. 21617 - continued 14 or 15 months ago and having spent some $49000.00 or more in design of this storm drain and we find that we are no closer to meeting the requirements of the City of West Covina than back in October of 1956. In the approvals given by Council in both instances., the original and revised, there are no provisions that we would be bound by anything in connection with what the Los Angeles County Flood Control might require, other than under the Subdivision Act in which we are subject to a flood control report for the benefit of the Real Estate Commissioner of the State of California. This is the report from the County Flood Control District and it is something that we need because if we do not have it the Real Estate Commissioner will not pass the subdivision. However,, we are not bound by any requirements so far as the method or manner of improve- ments are concerned. We are here to maintain, on the basis of the map we have • submitted to this Council and to the Engineer, that we can without any improve- ment meet a flood control report. That report could be good or bad but if it is good the Real Estate Board will pass the subdivision. We maintain that we are not concerned with improvements in so far as the Los Angeles Flood Control District is concerned. We are only concerned with what the City Council., or City Ordinance, calls for with respect to flood control improvements and with approval of your City Engineer, Director of Public Works or both. We have submitted 8 or 10 designs and we have approvals, .in a sense committments., from the Engineer Department, City Engineer and Public Works Director in that they have told us what we can do. Then when we bring this design back to them they say °that is fine' but tell us, 'you have to go to the Los Angeles Flood Control and get their approval'. We maintain that if we come in with a design to carry water that comes down that Wash., down stream, that it is up to the City of West Covina because that is the only entity that we are doing business with. It is up to them to pass that design and up to. this point they are un- able to do it. • This °ditch° has been here for a good number of years. So far as any personal investigation I have been able to make I find there has never been any trouble in regard to it carrying off flood waters. In no case have I seen more than 10 or 12 inches of water in the ditch. The ditch carries the water and there is nothing accomplished in improving this ditch so long as the land remains as it is. It is 36 wide and 40 inches in depth in various places and in others not over 24 inches and yet it carries all the water that comes in there. There has been a subdivision to the east of us that has been completed by Myers Brothers. That has the same ditch traversing it, although it is a little up- stream and carries a little bit less water and we might pick up 10 inches of water as it reaches our land. However,, the City and Engineering Department has permitted the construction of a gunite ditch on that area. It starts at the easterly side of the street entering that tract, with a floor of 24 inches wide and with side walls of perpendicular height of 24 inches. The extreme width at the top is six feet., or 72-inches. This water traverses through this • ditch and comes through the street and entering at the street there is a con- crete culvert going under the street and all the water passes through that culvert., which is 36minches wide and 30=inches high then it turns into an open gunite ditch., This ditch.is 36minches wide with a perpendicular height 0 C. C. 12-23-57 Page nine TRACT NO. 21617 m continued of 30®inches, an overall dimension at the top of 96minches, 8-feet. The ditch traverses to the westerly boundary of this tract and empties into an open dirt ditch and passes along for some 50 :to 100 feet and comes to a private road where it goes under the road through a 24-inch corrugated metal pipe. Then it - flows to open area on the golf course in a northwesterly direction to the bridge at Cameron Avenue, which is 9-feet wide and 7-feet high and then it enters to our property. Water passes through an open ditch on our property, through an open ditch on property to the north, where it meets the undercrossing on Cortez Street. It passes under Cortez Street in a 60minch corrugated metal pipe and then it passes into an open ditch and snakes through property until it reaches Citrus Avenue. It then passes under Citrus Avenue in a concrete culvert and then in- to an open ditch and then winds around until it hits Cortez Park. It passes through the Park in an open turf ditch, with no improvements whatsoever, and then passes into Walnut Creek Wash. So far as I know there has been no damage ever done by this wash and very little water passes through there, at least little enough so that it doesn't upset the turf in the Country Club or Cortez Park. iWe have submitted various plans of a design to improve this ditch in accordance with our original approval by Council. We have worked with the Engineering Department on an open ditch five feet wide with double wire revetments and dur- ing that time it was suggested by the Engineering Department that we might go into a pipe situation because of the fact that this property was in a high class section and that a pipe would be covered up and would be an ideal improvement there and that if such a thing could be done economically it would be good. I instructed my engineer to work on that matter and that is where we stubbed • our toe, and nothing has developed yet. The County Flood Control has requirements in so"far as design based on their figures of 50, 10 or 25 year storm cycles and we did it on the basis of the 25 year storm cycle and I believe the flood control says that we can go on the basis of the 25 year storm cycle figures which are 494 cubic feet per second. That figure is based on the ultimate capacity of this ditch and based on the absolute density of improvements on 490 some odd acres laying south and east of our property. You know this property and you know it is never going to be developed into four lots to an acre and you know the Country Club -will be there longer than us and there will be no improvements there whatsoever. The Country Club could be sold to a subdivider,'although it is only a conjecture,'and I believe the Board of Supervisors has a ruling that any golf course before it is subdivided, must be offered to the County before it is sold. The figures we get of 494 cubic feet a second requires an open gunite ditch 20mfeet wide and requires a base of 8-feet. The County Flood Control District maintains a 1=1/2 to 1 slopes on the size of this which brings it out to 2.0m feet, but the flood control goes further they say °we want a R.O.W. to run • C. C. 12-23-57 Page ten TRACT NO. 21617 ® continued through'. 'We want 15=feet additional feet, or a total of 35=feet, alongside this lot'. I can't see 35=feet going down this sub -division. It is not in Myers subdivision, nor the City Park so I do not feel that is a just request. We feel we have submitted many designs, I do not know whether Ted Walsh is a good or bad engineer but I have been in this business a long time and have been on a lot of subdivisions in West Covina, I have done business with Ted Walsh a number of years, yet on this deal we brought in a consultant from one of the largest engineering companies in California, With our design we had a meeting with your City Engineer, Director of Public Works- and the City Attorney and we got no where. • We want to improve this property, there is no question about it, but we can't afford $51,000.00 for a storm drain improvement for 15 lots. It isn't reason- able for the .Los Angeles Flood Control to expect us to do it. I know you are flood control conscious, but you can't ask for things that are unreasonable or discriminatory and you must allow us to use our land and this is stopping us from using our land. • We have submitted, and we have been turned down within the last two or three weeks, a plan we, are willing to allow 18mfeet of R.O.W. through this property. We would go in and run a 12=foot lined channel down there with concrete block walls on either side to confine this water,,with walls approximately four feet high. What we are willing to put in is better than double the ultimate capacity that the County wants. They want 494 cubic feet a second, this will take down over 1000 cubic feet a second. I am making an appeal to get something done here. I want you to consider this • thing and if we are right in our proposals and if our engineering firm has ability you should consider this. We are faced with a situation in that we .can only go ahead if the improvements come within reason. We have figured this on the basis of $2200 a lot on overall subdivision and it can't be done. We submitted in August 1957, a suggesting using concrete pipe. In this de= cision we were approached by a salesman for No -Joint Pipe Company which is a concrete pipe that is cast in place. This pipe is used in 48 cities in Cali- forniag even Los Angeles uses it, and it was suggested by your Engineering Department. It was referred to us, we did not know this outfit. We talked on this matter with the Engineering Department, we submitted on it and we were turned down by the Engineering Department because they said the Los Angeles Flood Control District would not approve it. The thing that is being forced on us is the fact that at some later date the City is going to ask flood control to take this ditch over for maintenance. This may be the concern to the City but I do not believe it is any concern of ours. You have a ditch east of us, in Myers tract, which does not comply with • what the flood control would accept. Anything north of us would not comply with flood control, nor would the pipe under Mrs. Stark's property. We do not know how you expect flood control to take over this 1300 feet of a two or • C. C. 12-23-57 Page eleven TRACT NO. 21617 - continued three mile ditch. If you had asked for improvement on all of it. O.K.. but our section is only a very small section of it, Mayor Kayo What was the objection of a 4 x 12 channel? Mr. Myers. It does not meet the requirements of the Los Angeles Flood Control District, They want 15-feet of service road alongside of it.. We maintain that if you start at Cameron and take the inner street that you can take a wheelbarrow and come back 150-feet in either direction and keep the ditch clean. without putting in a 15-foot roadway, It could be cleaned by hand work without having a 15-foot R.O.W. You have an open ditch clear to Walnut Creek without any improvements and subdivision to the east where you'd get no trucks in. Mayor Kayo What happened on Tract No, 12292 when it was passed and ac- cepted in 19463 Public Wks. Dir.. The requirements were this. There was another subdivision ordinance which has since been modified and on that map., in accordance with that act, natural drainage courses were • required to be. shown as traversing the lots. They were not required to .improve those channels at that time, but they were not given to the City of West Covina, they go with the property. My Myers. We would be glad to maintain ownership here. One of our requirements was to give you an easementg but if you do not want the easement we will keep it. Councilman Pittenger. How could we enforce them to clean this? City Attorney. You might be able to do it by some sort of tract restric- tions on the subdivider to do it. It makes a difference whether the City is going to accept this and be responsi- ble for it. Mayor Kay. Is there any reason why we have to accept this? Public Wks. Dir.. No. you did not require under the original conditions that it be granted as an easement to the City of West Covina. You did say that all easements would be improved and in the event they are not presented to the City then Section 31 of the Sub -division Ordinance would apply in which certain indications have to be shown on the map. Mayor Kay. If he gets a bad flood control report on the area it would be shown on the map. If the subdivider is willing to keep this he should be allowed to until it comes to certain re- 0 quirements. Councilman Pittenger. Something should be stated that restricts and enforces them to take care of it so it .be kept clean and the water coming `down freely. e 11 0 0 Co C. 12-23-57 Page twelve TRACT NO. 21617'- continued City Attorney° It can be done on paper but I have seen several of these things in operation and eventually the City seems to have to go in and acquire it and keep it cleaned out. Mr. Myers. I have put in a number of sumps that were passable and perm missibleo Councilman Pittenger. Who cleans thatupin say 10 years? Do you have some way to set this up so that this is kept clean? Mr. Myers. If it developed into a nuisance then I believe the City Police Power could step in. • Mayor Kay. I do not think this should be a City problem, nor are we in a position to require improvements above and below this subdivision and I believe it should be up to Mr. Myers. If it is not safe for the property to be sold the flood control will mark it on the map accordingly. Mr. Myers. They will establish a flood line on each lot if it is neces- sary. Motion by Councilman Mottinger, seconded by Councilman Brown and carried that this matter be referred to the Director of Public Works for his report and recommenda- tions at next regular meeting of Council. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS • RESIGNATION OF ARTIE JETT The City Clerk presented and read a communica- FROM CIVIC IMPROVEMENT tion from Artie Jett requesting acceptance of COMMITTEE e FIRE AND POLICE his resignation from the Fire and Police Divi- DIVISION sion of the Civic Improvement Committee, ef- ACCEPTED fective December 12, 1957. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes and carried that the resignation of Artie Jett from the Civic Improvement Committee indicated be ac- cepted. PROTEST OF COUNCIL ACTION The City Clerk pre'se nted and read a communica- IN RECENT ISSUING OF A tion from John A. McQueen, of West Covina LICENSE TO OPERATE A TAXI- Fleetwood Taxi Service, protesting the recent CAB IN THE CITY OF WEST issuing of a license to operate a taxicab in COVINA the City of West Covina in that it is contrary to Ordinance No. 324 which has been in force since July 26, 19,54. The City Clerk stated that Mr. McQueen had only very recently, December 2nd9 re- newed his license with the City, although it was due in for renewal on July 1st 12 • C. C. 12-23-57 Page thirteen WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - continued of this year. Motion by Councilman Pittenger., seconded by Councilman Brown and carried that the administrative staff., City Manager and City Clerk, give a report on this matter and that'the new applicant for a taxicab license be notified that the matter is being reviewed in relation to the issuance of license and possible revokation so that he will not make any further expenditures., until such time as a decision is reached on this matter. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORS REPORT BIDS FOR WORK ON AZUSA It was reported that bids on this matter will be AVENUE - STATE HIGHWAY open next month, January 16, 1958. PROJECT FREEWAY DEFICIENCY REPORT Page three of this report hadmap and request show- ing location and size of signs on freeway and on 'on and off' ramps which it was felt were necessaryo A reply was received from the State Highway Department that they will make a • field check of the proposals and as soon as.that has been completed a report will be issued by Highway Department on their findings. MEETING WITH SENATOR The records should show that a meeting was held with KNOWLAND ON BADILLO Senator Knowland on December 199 19579 at the West STORM DRAIN Covina City Hall, at which time the problem of the Badillo Storm Drain and the channel were discussed. Senator knowland took a keen interest -in the matter and during the field trip he looked at everything. We were pleased with the reception the matter received. • I would like to redirect communications to all the various agencies again, such as Road Department, State Highway Division, etc., and ask what they are going to do, It was consensus this be done. CITY ENGINEER FINAL MAP LOCATIONS Northeast corner. of Yarnell and Meeker Metes & Bounds Avenue. Subdivision No. 135-90 Frank Bandy 0.4 Acre m 2 lots ® Area District I. HELD OVER The City Engineer requested this matter be held over until additional signatures of owners can be obtained. Upon the recommendation of the City Engineer motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Pittenger and carried that Final Map of Metes and Bounds Subdivis- ion No. 135=90 be held over. 13 4 • C. 0. 12-23-57 CITY ENGINEER ® continued DISTRICT 57-2 (1911 Act) APPROVED Page fourteen Marianna, Street 4 Cabana Avenue and Roseway Street Sewer District, Report of the County of Los Angeles Health Officer was submitted and recommendation was for the acceptance of the report 'and that the City Council authorize the City.Engineer to proceed pursuant to the pro- visions -of Section 2808., Division 41, Street and Highways Code, the Special Assessment Investigations Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. The re- port of the Health Officer stated as follows° t°RECOMMENDATIONo01 It is respectfully recommended that sanitary sewers be'installed in this district. • ANALYSIS° This Department has made an investigation of the Marianna Street, Cabana Avenue and Roseway Street Sanitary Sewer District A° 11-57-29 City of West Covina., as shown.'on the attached map. During the course of this investigation 63 house -to -house calls were made. Of this number 23 occupants were not at home or did not answer the -door. Of the 40 property owners or tenants actually contacted, 25 or 622% reported that they had experienced trouble with their individual subsurface sewage disposal systems. They complained that the • seepage pits filled up, causing raw sewage to backup into the house plumbing fixtures or to overflow on to the surface of the ground., also that f re que nt pumping and cleaning out of the seepage.pits was necessary. The soil within the area of this proposed: sanitary sewer district consists mostly of loam and clay. This type of soil is not.conducive to the proper function- ing of any type of .individual subsurface sewage disposal system. In view of our survey, I, the undersigned Health Officer of the County of Los Angeles, officially designated by the City Council of the City of West Covina to perform public' health services for the City of West Covina, do hereby recommend that proceedings be instituted at once for the installation of sanitary sewers in -Marianna Street., Cabana Avenue and Roseway Street Sanitary Sewer District, City of West Covina, This recommendation is made as an improvement necessary to the protection of public health and pursuant to the provisions of Section 2808 of the Streets and Highways Code, Signed ROY 0. GILBERT, M.D. Health Officer Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Pittenger and carried that the preliminary report on District 57-2 (1911 Act) be accepted and the City Engineer be instructed to proceed as indicated. 14 • C11 C. C. 12-23-57, Page fifteen CITY ENGINEER - continued RESOLUTION N0, 1253 The City Attorney presented "A RESOLUTION OF THE District 57-2 (1911 Act) CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED DETERMINING THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN SANI- TARY SEWERS, IS NECESSARY AS A HEALTH MEASURE IN MARGARITA DRIVE BETWEEN BROADMOOR AVENUE AND CARMENCITA DRIVE, AND MARIANA STREET BETWEEN BROADMOOR AVENUE AND SUNSET AVENUE, AND -SAWYER AVENUE BETWEEN EAST BOUND- ARY OF TRACT NO. 17015 AND ORANGE AVENUE, AND.SHERWAY STREET BETWEEN WALNUT CREEK PARKWAY AND ORANGE .AVENUE, AND ROSEWAY STREET BETWEEN WALNUT CREEK PARKWAY AND ORANGE AVENUES AND ROBINDALE STREET BETWEEN WALNUT CREEK PARKWAY AND ORANGE AVENUE, AND.LEEWOOD,STREET BETWEEN WALNUT CREEK PARKWAY AND ORANGE AVENUE., AND' DELVALE STREET BETWEEN CABANA AVENUE AND TONOPAH AVENUE, AND WALNUT CREEK PARK- WAY BETWEEN 180 FEET ± NORTH OF ROSEWAY STREET AND ROSEWAY STREET, AND WALNUT CREEK PARKWAY BETWEEN 180. FEET a NORTH OF LEEWOOD STREET AND LEEWOOD STREET, AND CABANA AVENUE BETWEEN-FRANCISQUITO AVENUE AND DELVALE STREET." Mayor Kayo Hearing no objections., we will waive further reading of the body of the Resolution. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Mottinger that Resolution No. 1253 be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows., Ayess Councilmen Barnes, Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes o None Absent., None RESOLUTION NO. 1254 The City attorney presented "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Chapter 20 funds COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO, 727 OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA APPLYING FOR AN ALLOTMENT UNDER CHAPTER 209 STATUTES OF 1946,91 Mayor Kayn Hearing no objections we, will waive further reading of the body of the Resolution. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Mottinger that Resolution No, 1254 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows. Ayes. Councilmen Barnes, Brown$ Mottinger., Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes o None Absent., None RESOLUTION NO. 1255 The City Attorney presented "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Chapter 47 Funds OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NOS, 725 AND Adopted 1050 AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A PLANS APPLICATION UNDER CHAPTER 47$ STATUTES 1944 (4th E,S,)," Mayor Kayo Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the Resolution, Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown that.Resolution'No. 1255 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows, oi5- C. C. 12=23-5.7 Page sixteen CITY ENGINEER - continued Ayes Councilmen Barnes, Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes None Absent. None PLANNING COMMISSION . None PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION None CITY ATTORNEY ORDINANCES • ORDINANCE CHANGING "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPEEDLIMIT ON SOUTH WEST COVINA DECREASING THE MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT SUNSET AVENUE S6 Q UPON A CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET, TO WIT*. SUNSET INTRODUCTION AVENUE, WITHIN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA." Mayor Kay*. Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the Ordinance. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes and carried that the Ordinance be introduced. SECOND READING The City Attorney presented "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 556 OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA ESTABLISHING A PERSONNEL SYSTEM Personnel Ordinance FOR THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCE AND ADOPTED PARTS OF ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT THEREWITH." Mayor Kays Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the Ordinance. Motion by Councilman Mottinger., seconded by Councilman Brown that Ordinance No. 556 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows. Ayes. Councilmen Barnes, Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes s None Absent. None SECOND READING ORDINANCE NO. 557 The City Attorney presented "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Approving Amendment COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMENDING SECTION 900 No, 18' OF. ORDINANCE NO. 325 RELATING TO THE USES PERMITTED IN (City Initiated) THE C-2 ZONE." ADOPTED (Relating to "filling Stations" within Zone C-2). • Mayor Kays Hearing no objections we will waive further reading of the body of the Ordinance. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes that Ordinance No. 557 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows*. 16 • C, C, 12-23-57 Page seventeen ORDINANCE N0, 557 continued Ayes'. Councilmen Barnes., Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger,, Mayor Kay Noes'. None Absent., None SECOND READING The City Attorney presented "AN ORDINANCE OF THE ORDINANCE N0, 558 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA REZONING Approving Zone Change CERTAIN PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GARVEY AVENUE, No, 100 BETWEEN BARRANCA STREET AND GRAND AVENUE." ADOPTED (Vincent P. Schilz), Mayor Kays Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the Ordinance, • Motion.by Councilman Barnes,, seconded by Councilman Mottinger and carried t4at Ordinance No, 558 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows. Ayes. Councilmen Barnes, Browns Mottinger., Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes. None Absents None ORDINANCE LOCATION: Northeast corner of Azusa and Garvey • Approving Zone Change Avenues (R-3) No, 110 (Garvey & Shepherd Inv, Co,) "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY INTRODUCTION OF WEST COVINA REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF AZUSA AND GARVEY AVENUES." Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Mottinger and carried that the Ordinance be introduced, • RESOLUTION N0, 1256 LOCATION. Northeast corner of Azusa and Approval of Precise Plan Garvey Avenues (R-3) No, 118 (Garvey & Shepherd Inv, Co,) The City Attorney presented " RESOLUTION OF ADOPTED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA APPROVING PRECISE PLAN N0, 118 UPON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF AZUSA AND GARVEY AVENUES," Mayor Kay• Hearing no objections,, we will waive further reading of the body of the Resolution. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Pittenger that Resolution No, 1256 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows; Ayes'. Councilmen Barnes., Brown, Mottinger,, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes : None 40 Absents None 17 • C. C. 12-23-57 Page eighteen CITY ENGINEER - continued AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by FOR SALE OF REAL ESTATE BETWEEN Councilman Mottinger that the City At- DONALD A. NEELY AND THE CITY OF torney be instructed to amend the Agree- WEST.COVINA, AND EXECUTION THEREOF ment for Sale of Real Estate between APPROVED Donald A. Neely and the City of West Covina adding five per cent (5%) to the purchase price,, which is the equivalent of the interest for one year,, and that the Mayor and the City Clerk be instructed to execute the agreement as soon as this agreement is amended. Motion passed on roll call as follows.* Ayes. Councilmen Barnes,, Brown, Mottinger,, Pittenger,, Mayor Kay Noes . None • Absent. None CITY CLERK CITY OF INDUSTRY PROPOSED ANNEXATION The City Clerk presented and read letters from the County Boundary Com- mission notifying the City of West Covina of the City of Industry°s proposed Annexations No. 10 - Located at the • N/E corner of Valley Blvd. and Pass -Covina Road and No. 13 - Located at the SA corner of 8th Avenue and Valley Blvd., opposite West end of the City of Industry, and No. 14 extending from the west end of the City of Industry almost to Five Points. The City Clerk indicated these annexations do not affect the City of West Covina. PETITION FOR SANITARY SEWERS Petition requesting that necessary • steps be taken to provide sanitary facilities in the Service Avenue Sewer District. The City Clerk stated that the petition had 41 non -validated signatures repre- senting a total of 45% of the district. However, the City Clerk further stated that this petition did not have the required percentage of signatures but there are plans to possibly combine this with District A-11-57-6, making this fact unimportant. Motion by Councilman Pittenger, seconded by Councilman Mottinger and carried that the petition be referred to the Sanitation Department for recommendation. The'City Clerk stated that an application had been made by Coffee Dan.°s for an Alcoholic Beverage License. CITY TREASURER Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Mottinger and carried that the City Treasurer's Report for November, 1957 be accepted to be filed for the record. COUNCIL COMMITTEE, REPORTS Mayor Kay stated that Councilman Pittenger would attend Commission meetings, • 0 • C. C. 12-23-57 COUNCIL COMMITTEES REPORTS m continued Page nineteen starting in January9 for his required length of time and that Councilman Mottinger would go back on as director of the League of California Citie's at the first of the year. JOINT MEETING OF January 6., 1957. This meeting to be held after the FIRE AND POLICE _public hearings scheduled by Council on this date. COMMITTEE EAST SAN GABRIEL To be held in West Covina Council Chambers VALLEY PLANNING COMMITTEE Thursday, January.239 1958. REPORTS, CITY MANAGER BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITERS The City Manager stated that a written report had been received., copies of which had been presented to Council., which confirms the reclassification and verbal report given at the last meeting of Council. RECREATION PROGRAM The termination arrangement has been approved by APPROVED the Board of Supervisors and after January 1., 1958 we will be having our own recreation program. The personnel of the district carrying on this program, other than the director, and known as the Play or Recreation Leader will be absorbed into our program with the recommendation of the same rates of pay. I'have this report for you for the record and would recommend it on the basis of our, findings at budget time that we establish a classification of Director of Parks and Recreation with Salary Range 43. The Director has been appointed, a Robert Gingrich of Newport Beach, at an entering salary of $575,00 a month and a stopping salary of $115.00 a month. He has been appointed at a salary of $641.00 a month. We need a Recreation Supervisor at $2.00 per hour .and a Playleader at a start- ing wage of $1.66 per hour to go to $1.93 per hour, in four steps. Motion by Councilman Mottinger, seconded by Councilman Pittenger and carried that the recommendations of the City Manager with regard to the Recreation Program and Personnel be approved.. PLANNING CONSULTANT Motion by ,Councilman Mottinger., seconded by Cpuncilman.Brown and carried that the Planning Consultant, Mr, Charles Bennett, be invited to submit his proposals in written form, suitable for acceptance by the City,, and that the City Attorney be instructed to present his report on the matter. • ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS During the past months of the current fiscal year APPROVED Council has authorized certain activities for which no budget appropriations were originally made. It is requested that Council appropriate the following fund from the 19 A • C, C, 12-23-57 Page twenty PLAN NI-M—C m ued Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund. $19000.00 m= Account 117T7 Annexations: To cover costs in con- junction with annexation promotions and activities, $19000.00 Account 117T5 Civil Improvement Committee: Consider- able expense has been incurred for maps, blueprints, stationery., etc, $19800.00 mm Account 117% Chamber of Commerce° Six months at $300.00 per month, • $29500.00 mo Account 117T3 Maps, Brochures, Literature., etc. To cover costs of three different brochure printings., mailings., etc,, and provide additional funds for this type of activity, $6.,300,00' mo Total to be appropriated. • Motion by Councilman Brown,, seconded by Councilman Pittenger that $6,300.00 be appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Hind for Account 1179 Municipal Advertising, Promotions., and Activitie39 for distribution to sub -accounts as'recomme nded by the City Manager. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes Councilmen Barnes, Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes : None • Absent: None SPECIAL CENSUS Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes and carried to. proceed with the taking of a special census in the City of West Covina. ACQUISITION OF I would like authorization to proceed to negotiate on ADDITIONAL PROPERTY this matter on the condition that the easterly property IN COMIDA PARK line, or take line, as proposed would be moved ten feet (101) to the west to eliminate any severance from property or improvements, Motion by Councilman Mottinger, seconded by Councilman Pittenger and carried that the City Manager be instructed to proceed with the necessary arrangements in the acquisition of additional property easterly of Comida Park and accord- ing to the City Manager's recommendations, I' • DEMANDS APPROVED Motion by Councilman Barnes., seconded by Councilman Brown that Demands in the amount of $71.,690,769 as shown on Demand Sheets'C-64 and B-34 be approved9 this to include funds transfer in the amount of $31,354.56. Motion passed on roll call as,follows: - 20 - J • • 0 Co C. 12-23=57 DEMANDS APPROVED - continued Page twenty-one Ayes• Councilmen Barnes, Brown, Mottinger, Pittenger, Mayor Kay Noes . None Absent. None There being -no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10.20 P.M. until Monday, Jamary 6, 1958 at 8 P.M. 21