Loading...
05-07-1956 - Regular Meeting - MinutesMINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIF01?NIA May 7, 1956 The meeting was cz�dled to order by Mayor Brmni in the West Covina City Hall at 8:o4 P.m. Present: Mayor Brown, Councilmen Kay, Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger Absent: City Treasurer Others: City Manager6 City Clerk and Ass1t. l,dministrative Officer; City Engineer, City Attorney.- Mr. V. "'J'alters, Chief Finance Officer; Mr. M. Gerschler, Planning Department- Mr. Walter Nollac, Sanitation Engineer. • MINUTES minutes of the meeting of April 239 1956 were corrected and should APPROVED read- Page 16 - second item of Signature Authorization - Fern Sayers Merry, City Treasurer not Fern S. Merry, City Treasurer as U shown. The Minutes of April 23, 1956 were approved as corrected. COMINIUNI r_A.TIONS None WRITTEN City Clerk presented and read communication dated May 3, 1956 COMMUNICATIONS of Appeal to the City Council and asking for hearing from the decision of the Planning Commission on Precise Plan No. 86 C� and Zone Chance No. 77, Date for hearing on this matter was set by Council for May 28, 1956. Mayor Brown stated that further communications, as presented by the City Clerk, regarding request for hearing and notice of appeal from applicants of Zone Change No. 71, Precise Plan and Reclassification No. 74 and Precise Plan and Reclassi- fication No. 75 need not be reads unless so desired, as members of Council had copies of communications and this matter had already been set for hearing at regular meeting of May 14, 1956. BID AWARDED City Engi.neer,. "Council will recall that one sealed bid was Discing of TeTeeds received and opened at the meeting of April 23., 1956 and re - APPROVED feared to me for report. I have checked with five (5) communi- •-ties which have used the services of the bidder, Watts -Hardman Contractors, Inc. and they report their services have been satisfactory.' However, it is recommended that we use full time inspection as the movement of work is very rapid. I would recommend that the bid be accepted and suggest that the City Clerk Rn.d the Mayer be authorized to negotiate the contract." Motion by Councilman Mottinger., seconded by Councilman Kay that on recommendation of City Engineer, bid for discing of weeds be given to 1118tts-Hardman Contractors, Inc. of Van Nuys and that. authorization be given to the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract. Motion passed on roll call as fioilows: Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown Noes: None Absent: None • Adj. C.C. 5-7v56 -2m RESOLUTION NO. 937 City Attorney presented and read Resolution Terminating proceedings on No. 937 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Northerly Annexation No. 138 THE CITY OF VEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA TERMINATING ADOPTED PROCEEDINGS WITH RESPECT TO NORTHERLY ANNEXATION DISTRICT NO. 138." Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Crumley that Resolution No. 937 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows. - Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown Noes None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 938 City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 938 Terminating proceedings on IwA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF • Northerly Annexation No. 1.39 WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA TERMINATING PROCEEDINGS ADOPTED WITH RESPECT TO NORTHEFT Y ANNEXATION DISTRICT NO. 139." Motion by'Council.man Pittenger, seconded by Councilman Mottinger that Resolution No. 938 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger, Kay., Brown Noes: None Absent: None DATES SET FOR HEARING Date of hearing was set for May 28, 1956 on the following: PRECISE PLAN NO. 86 Leon and Hyman F-urra, applicants. Location: North - and west corner of Walnuthaven Drive and Garvey Avenue. ZONE CHANGE NO. 77 Request: Adoption of Official Precise Plan and C-1 Uses. Existing Zone: Rm3. Denied by Planning Commission on May 29 1956. Request for appeal from applicants May 3, 1956. PRECISE PLAN . J. D. and Lillian H. Berger, applicants. and Location-., NW corner of Merced and Sunset Avenues. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 84(1405) Request: C-1. Existing Zone: R-A, Potential C-1. Recommended for approval by the Planning Commission Resolution No. 377 on May 2, 1956. • RESOLUTION NO. 936 City Attorney presented and read Resol.u- Enunciating Statement of Policy tion No. 936 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY and Af7reement regarding Anne)(ation COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, of Territory ENUNCIATING A STATEMENT OF POLICY AND ADOPTED AGREEMENT REGARDING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO SAID ti"ITY.rr Motion by Councilman Crumley, seconded by Councilman Mottinger that Resolution No. 936 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Armes: Councilmen Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown Noes None Absent: None 1] Adj. C.C. 5-7-56 -3- PRECISE PLAN NO. 78 Maps were presented by the City Engineer. Location: and West side of Sunset Avenue between Francisquito Avenue ZONE C1-]A1--JGE 140. 72 and Delvale Street. Request: Adoption of Official Reade & Kni,Mht Precise Plan, and C-1 and R-P. Existing Zone: R-1. DENIED Held over from meeting of April 16, 1956 to May 7, 1956 at request of applicants because of changes to be made in Precise Plan as submitted. Mr. Gerscl-Ller presented and read Resolutions No. 247 and No. 248 of the Planning Commission reco.,11mending denial of this application. It was stated that public hearings before Council had been held on , this matter but it would be reviewed at this time for the benefit of new members of the Council. Councilman Crumley: With 12 acres on the east already zoned commercial I believe this is 'spot zoning.' I do not think this is good zoning and I am not in favor of it. Councilman Mottinger: I did not hear previous testimony presented on this matter, but in vip.w of the 'Planning Commission recommendation for denial I would go along with their decision. Councilman Kay: I believe, in my opinion, the main consideration is that we have houses existing on properties here and many times we have encountered pro-lblems in such a situation as this. I do not believe there is a desperate need for such a change at this time and I do not think applicants request is a justified need at this time. Councilman Pittenger: I would go along with the dicision of the Planning Commission. Mayor Brown: I agree with the views of the Council and would go along with the decision of the Planning Commission also. Motion by Councilman Motting.'er, seconded by Councilman Kay and carried that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be accepted and Precise Plan No. 78 be denied. "lotion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Mottinger and carried that in view of denial of Precise Plan No. 78, Zone.Change No. 72 be denied. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED Mayor Brown stated that this is the time and place PRECISE PLAN NO. 77 for public hearing on Precise Plan No. 77 and Cone and Change No. 70. Location: East side of Sunset ZONE CHANGE NO. 70 Avenue, north of Roseway Street between Bruce and Waldrip and Mautz Sunset Avenues. Request: Adoption of Official DENIED Precise Plan and R-P. Existing Zone: R-A. Held over from April. 23, 1956 to May 7, 1956 at request of applicant because of -absence of their representative. Denied by Planning Commission on March Pl. 1956. Adj. C.C. 5-7-56, -4- Maps were presented by the City Engineer. Mr. Gerschler presented and read Resolutions of the Planning Commission recommending denial. Recommendations of City Engineer were previously read at meeting April 23, 1956. There was no testimony presented, the hearing was declared closed. Councilman Kay: On these lots No. 20 and 21 in Tract No. 19505, is that going to be R-1 or is it being built at present time. Mr. Gerschler: It exists on there at present time. Councilman Mottinger: What would be non -conforming use? Mro Gerschler: The rear northerly half of this property has an auto repair garage which is conducted as a part time business. We found that this came into existence quite a. few years prior to the zoning ordinance; thereby it becomes a non -conforming use and has a remaining abatement period of 23 years before they are forced to abate. The Planning Commission mentioned that perhaps there would be other means of handling this under means .now in process such as fire and safety laws. Councilman Pittengert How near are residences to this property? What of potential danger now? Mr. Gerschler: Residences within 100 feet. I find that the degree of danger, upon verbal communication with the Fire Chief, is little or none to the surrounding properties at the present time. Councilman Mottinger: What about the placement of the City Yard? Is that something that is going to he permanent? Is that compatible with the zoning? I ask this question as City should conform to proper zoning too. Councilman Kay: I believe we have in process at the present time zoning regarding municiple buildings that are adding to our zoning ordinance, Mr. Gerschler: Whether the placement of the City Yard is permanent • is a question not fully resolved. However, we have prepared a Master Plan for the development of the City Yard and have shown on this a substantial set -back and proper landscaping treatment and have gone to some length to give compatable surroundings. Councilman Kay: One factor is that this Tract No. 19505, and Tract No. 19453 there, are both developed. I do not parti- cularly recall whether Tract No. 2190P is developed or nots, but it has gone R-1 and is directly across from the City Yard so I do not think that request on basis that City Yard or school across the street is detrimental is based on fact. To request variance or zone change in this case to R-P or R-3 when it is apparent other property is being developed under R-1 leads me to believe that a request of this type is not in order -at this time. Adj. C.C. 5-7-56 -5- Councilman Crumley, It appears it is being all developed as R-1 and I believe there is sufficient R-P elsewhere. On that basis it does rot appear to me that there is good or sufficient reasons for R-P zoning here. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Crumley and carried Precise Plan No. 77 and Zone Change No. 70 be denied. TENTATIVE MAP Tentative Maps of Tract No. 18283 were presented by the City .dF Engineer, Location: NW corner of MercedandSunset Avenues. TRACT NO. 18283 28.7 - Acres - 101 Lots - Area District II. Approved by J. D. Berger Planning Commission May 2, 1956 • HELD OVER Mr. Gerschler: I wish to bring to the attention of the Council that item 10 on the Agenda, Precise Plan and Reclassification No. R4 (1405), which has been set for hearing on May 28 is contiguous and dependent upon this Tentative Map. The Planning Commission was satisfied that proper relationship exists the two. However, you may wish to hold this map over pending hearing on the Precise Plan and Reclassification. City Attorney.- I see no objection to Council holding over the decision on this Tentative Map until hearing of proposed Precise Plan and Reclassification No. 84 (1405) on May R8. Mr. Berger, Applicant., I would have no objection to this map being held over in conjuction with hearin,r,, of Precise Plan and Reclassification. It was consensus that Tentative Map of Tract No. 18283 be held over, with the consent of the applicant, in conjunction with hearing to be held May ?8., 1956 on Precise Plan and Reclassification No. 84 (1405). REQUEST FOR CITY PARTICIPATION Petitions from home owners on Vine Avenue between IN IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Tract No. 21042 and Pima A-enue. Held over from April 23 for City Engineerts report. City Engineer: Under Metes and Pounds Subdivision No. 135-127 we required Mr. Harold Barnes to furnish full street • improvement on Vine Avenue across 165 foot frontage. Immediately the people in the neighborhood adjacent asked if they could participate in project, by furnishing cost of curb and gutters and so petitioned Council. After we studied the situation we found certain facts existed which I have presented to you in a report dated April 20, 1956 and the purpose for bringing, this before the Council tonight is to secure your authorization to proceed with the project on some sort of basis. We are making this suggestion to see what you (Council) think of the proposal and desire to knm,,, whether or not we should prodeed further along these lines. Councilman Mottinger: Where do we stand if only lesser amount would want this project done and remainder do not? Adj. C.C. 5-7-56 City Engineer: We will make a complete survey and if we can get 80 or 85 per cent in accord with it we usually are justified to go ahead on that basis. Motion by Councilman Kay,, seconded by Councilman Crumley and carried that authoriza,- tion be given to see if a satisfactory arrangement can be worked out with property owners and City in this matter and present back to City Council. City Manager: I believe this is by subscription and not under 1911 Act. In event 15 per cent do not wish to enter into it who will share it with other property owners? We have., under -1;his arrangement, no legal process for making expenditure lien against the property. Councilman Kay: Inthe past, sections were left out. City Manager: I believe that is very impractical,, and think it should be made plain that this action of Council indicates proceeding along lines indicated with full report to be made to Council before any actual work authori- zation takes place. STREET LO�qERING Location: Yarnell Avenue and Meeker Avenue. Additional authori- MEEKER AVE. zation for City's participation in cost of lowering existing TRACT NO. 19064 Meeker Avenue pavement in connection with subdivision improve- APPRCVED ments. Amount, $986.00 City Engineer: This tract is under construction and as indicated in report the City did. agree to participate in the lowering of Yarnell Avenue. We now find that our cul-de-sac street, Meeker Avenue, is so narrow that if we do not rebuild that portion we cannot construct a safe surface. We recommend that we participate in lowering the existing pavement on this street and further eliminate the need of having to go in at a later date and lower the whole pavement. Motion by Councilman Pittenger, seconded by Councilman Mottinger that additional authorization be given for City's participation in cost of lowering existing Meeker Avenue pavement in connection with subdivision improvements in the amount of 59F6.00. Motion passed on rollcall as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown Noes: None, Absent: None TIME EXTENSION Location: SW corner of Cameron and Valinda Avenues. Timo limit FILING OF FINAL 111AP expiration May 9, 1956. City Engineer stated that Final Map TRACT NO. 17637 almost ready to be filed but there are a few detttils to be worked (November 9, 1956) out in connection with Plans and Profiles, and would recommend APPROVED this request be granted. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Crumley and carried that a time extension of six (6) months from expiration date of May 9,, 1956 be granted for filing or Final Map of Tract No. 17637. Adj. C.C. 5-7-56 -7- ACCEPT STREET DAPROVEME14TS Upon recommendation of City Engineer, motion by TRACT NO. 21029 Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Crumley and A PPROVED carried that Street Improvements in Tract No. 21029 be accepted and authorization be given for the release of Pacific National Fire Insurance Company Bond BP-51480 in the amount of $37,500-00 subject to receipt of deposit in the amount of $495.00 for street trees and signs not installed to date. Location: SW corner of Azusa. Avenue and Vine Avenue. ACCEPT STREET IMPROVEMENTS Upon recommendation of the City Engineer motion by ZONE VARIANCE NO. 72 Councilman Mcttinger� seconded by Councilman Key * So. California Edison Company and carried that street improvements on Zone Variance APPROVED No. 72 be accepted and authorization be given for the release of Seaboard.Surety Company Bond No. RLA-12902 in the amount of $7400-00. Location: SST corner of Puente and Vincent Avenues. ACCEPT SEWER FACILITIES Upon recommendation of the Sanitation Engineer TRACT NO. 21037 motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman APPROVED Pittenger and carried that sewer facilities in Tract No. 21037 be accepted and authorization be given for the amount of $380.00. RESOLUTION NO,. 932 A?POINTING MEMBER AND ALTERNATE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 15 and 22 Jay D. Brown and Dale Pittenger ADOPTED Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO.'933 ABAND014ING TWO PUBLIC STREETS (El 'genia and Grovecenter) TRACT NO. 18818 RESTORING EGRESS .tND INGRESS TO BADILLO SDI'. AND LARK ELLEN AVE. ADOPTED City Attorney presented and read Relosution No. 932 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I'MIST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A MEMBER TO TM43 TIOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NO. 15 AND 22 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY." Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Crumley that Resolution No. 932 be adopted. Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 933 "A RESOLUTION OF TI-IL CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, VACATING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS IN TRACT NO. 18818 IN SAID CITY AND RESTORING TO THE (XqNERS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN SAID CITY VEHICULfiR RIGHTS ALONG BADILLO STREET AND LARK ELLEN AVENUE PREVIOUSLY RELINQUISHED TO SAID CITY." Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Mottinger that Resolution No. 933 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follo",:,S: Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger., Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown Noes: None Absent: None Adj. C.C. 5-7-56 EMERGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 934 ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURE FOR IMPRgTEMENT OF SUNSET AVE. FROM MERCED AVENUE TO FRANCISQUITO ($2973-46) ADOPTED City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 934 ItA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA., CALIFORNTA, DECLARING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY DEMAND THE IMMEDIATE EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC MONEY TO SAFEGUARD LIFE, HEALTH OR PORPERTY.11 Motion by Councilman Pittenger, seconded by Council- man Kay that Resolution No. 934 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 935 City Attorney presented and read Resloution No. 935 REGULATIONS FOR BIDDING FOR "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MUNICIPAL PURCH,,'.SES WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, PRESCRIBING REGULATIONS ADOPTED FOR BEDDING FOR MUNICIPAL PURCHASES.?' Motion by Councilman Crumley, seconded by Councilman Mottinger that Resolution No. 935 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown Noes: None Absent: None FIRST READING City Attorney presen ' ted and read Ordinance ORDINANCE NO- 470 No. 470 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL PRECISE PLAN NO. 79 OF THE CITY OF WE"�T COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPT - (Garvey Blvd. and Harbert St.) ING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVEL.;PMENT OF CERTAIN Edwards and Howard PROPERTIES IN SAID CITY, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 147 OF THIS CITY OF WEST COVINA, AND AMENDING SAID ORDINANCE NO. 147 (Edwards and Howard)" Location: Between Garvey Blvd. and Harbert Street. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Council- man Mottinger and carried that Ordinance No. 470 be given its first reading. FIRST READING City Attorney presented and read Ordinace No. 471 ORDINANCE NO. 471 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 14 OF WEST COVINA,, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN UNCLASSI- and FIED USE AND PRECISE PLAN UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF PRECISE PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 325 OF SAID CITY.It (Mrs. Thomas (Rowse) Rowse). Location: South side of Garvey Avenue,, east of Barranca Street. Motion by Councilman Crumley, seconded by Councilman Kay and carried that Ordinance No. 471 be given its first reading. FIRST READING City Attorney presented and read Grdinance ORDINANCE NO. 472 No. IL72 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE, CITY COUNCIL ADDING NEW ZONE (P-B) PUBLIC PURPOSE OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, AND AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 325 OF THE CITY OF EXTENDING ZONING DESIGNATION TO MIDDLE WEST COVINA) KNOWN AS THE, 'COMPREHENSIVE OF STREET ZONING ORDINANCE', BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE THERETO TO BE KNOWN AS AND NU-r-1BERED ARTICLE Adj. C.C. 5-7-56 -9- Ordinance No. 472 Conttd: 11.-A (Section 1105), CREATING A NEW ZONE DENOMINATED ZONE P-B, A PUBLIC PRUPOSE ZONE, AND BY ADDING A NEW SECTION THERETO TO BE KNWN AS AND NUMBERED SECTION 1401-Alt Motion by Councilman Mottinger, seconded by Councilman Pittenger and carried that Ordinance No. 472 be given its first reading. SECOND READING Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman ORDINANCE NO, 46S Crumley and carried that second and final reading Precise Plan No. 76 (1405) be given to Ordinance No. 468 "AN ORDINANCE OF C. J. Hurst, Jr. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA- ADOPTED ADOPTING A PRECISE PLAN FOR TH'f; DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN S;iID CITY, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS • OF ORDIIDf NCE NO. 147 OF THE CITY OF ?dEST COVINA, AND AMENDING SAID ORDINANCE NO. 147 (C.J. Hurst, Jr.)." Location: SW corner of Merced and Sunset Avenues. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Pittenger and carried that reading of the body of the Ordinance lie waived. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Pittenger and carried that reading of the body of the Ordinance be waived. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Crumley that Ordinance No. 468 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown Noes: None Absent: None SECOND READING Motion by Councilman Pittenger, seconded by Councilman ORDINANCE NO. 469 Kay and carried that second and final reading be given Precise Plan No. 70 to Ordinance No. 469 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF G Robinson THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PRECISE ADOPTED PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN SEND CITY, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 147 OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AND AMENDING SAID ORDINANCE NO. 147 (Robinson)." Location: West side of Glendora Avenue, between Merced Avenue and Vine Street. Motion by Council- man Pittenger, seconded by Councilman Kay and carried that reading of the body of the Ordinance be waived. Motion by Councilman Crumley, seconded by Councilman Pittenger that Ordinance No. 469 be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: • Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Brown Noes: None Absent: None REPORTS OF CITY 14ANAGER City Manager: "The West Covina Employee's Association YOUTH DAY requests that the Council authorize looking with favor on a program which this association proposes. This association wants to prove it can be of benefit to the community and suggests the observing of a Youth Day program by vote of the people for an outstanding high school student. They would establish a fund and ballot program to place the student with the highest number of votes as Mayor, next highest as Councilmen and so on through the entire city organization and then have these young people take over for the day. The money from the voting process would be used for playground equipment to be placed in the city parks. Adj. C. C. 5-7-56 -10- Mr6 Kupferer I believe this program would be beneficial in many ways and would be accepted with approval of Council in back of it. Believe it would prove interesting to the ;young people and at.the same time benefit children as they would gain playground equipment. City Manager: The point I would like to make is that the Employee's Association is not concerned with their problems alone. Motion by Council Crumley, seconded by Councilman Mottinger and carried that the City Council endorse this proposed activity to its fullest extent. SPECIAL CENSUS REPORT City Manager stated that filing of official certificate • of special census had been made in Washington, D.C. and brings the census count to 35,986 with copies being sent to. proper State offices. This would bring us in an additional revenue of $66,500 depending on amount of monies to be distributed and refunded. There is approximately $39,000 'In Lieu Fund, $26,000 State Gas Tax Fund and $5,500 in County Gas Tax Fund. "These figures are not official but until such time as distribution is known I believe this is what we can go by." REMOVAL OR SALVAGE OF City Manager: "On site of civic center there is an BUILDINGS ON CIVIC old home and accessory buildings. We feel these build - CENTER SITE ings are valueless and should be removed to enhance the APPROVED property. 'There is a safety problem in regard to buildings. Two fires have been set. We have determined through our departments that these buildings are valueless but would like to have authorization forbids on removal or salvage of these buildings. If no bids are received I believe we should destroy and remove them from the area." Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Pittenger and carried that on the recommendation of the City Manager authorization be given to advertise for bids on the removal or salvage of buildings on Civic Center Site, and if no bids are forthcoming (City) should destroy and remove them from the area. ATTENDANCE City Clerk, Mr. Flotten, requested formal permission of the NATIONAL CONFERENCE Council to attend a. National Conference of Municipal Clerks MUNICIPAL CLERKS in New Orleans from May ,21 to 26, and further requested • May 21-26, 1956 that if possible the City absorb the cost of attendance Robert Flotten at conference. Mr. Flotten further stated that he was willing to absorb the cost of actual traveling and would use his va.ctaion period for travel time required. Councilman Crumley: I believe a voucher could be kept in regard to mileage there and back, and also include reasonable conference cost. City Manager; I believe that the suggestion of Councilman Crumley that necessary and reasonable expenses be allowed is fair.: In that Mr. Flotten is willing to use his vacation for the time required.there will be enough gain from this meeting to warrent this. It should be left open and subject to audit on return, of necessary and reasonable expenses. • Adj. e.c. 5-7-56 -11- It is our intention to have a resolution on the matter of policy regarding attendance at matters of this sort. Motion by Councilman Mottinger, seconded by Councilman Crumley that Mr. Flotten be authorized to attend the conference of National Institue of Municipal Clerks in New Cleans from May 21 to 26, and that necessary and reasonable expenses be allowed subject to audit upon return from subject conference. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Mottinger, Noes: None Absent: None Crumley, Pittenger, Kay, Browne APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL City Clerk presented and read application for lic�lor BEVERAGE LICENSE license by Earle I. Magusin.at 204 So. Glendora Avenue. Earle I. Magusin City Clerk stated that he had a number of complaints from business people on Glendora Avenue against allowing another liquor location in the area, and not sure how this protest should be approached. City Attorney: If the City Council feels this might be objectionable they can record their objections with the Board of Equaliza- tion thro-gh the City Manager. Motion by Councilman Crumley, seconded by Councilman Mottinger and carried that this matter be investigated by the City Manager. City Manager questioned as to -the fact that if necessary and possible under dates shown on application and other conditions of permit should a protest be made and a report given. It was consensus that the matter be handled in this manner if deemed necessary upon investigation by the City Manager. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Mrs. M. VanDame of 1532_E. Garvey Blvd. brought to the FARE RAISE attention of Council the matter of a State public hearing on ..Thursday to hear those in protest or in favor of a public .transportation fare raise. Mrs. VanDame further stated that this would encompass public transportation facilities out here and in her experience there is now no better bus transportation or more rapid schedules than there were ten years - ago. It was her contention that a representative should be sent to protest raising of fares unless the public transportation facilities are improved to give half- hour schedules during peak hours at least. Motion by Councilman Pittenger, seconded by Councilman Kay and carried that authori- zation be given to have a representative attend this hearing. There was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. Regular meeting of the City Council May 14, 1956. YYIYI. V. LilY1 M IYI tom. D. R.1 t%Frll:lAL RCYV KItK DUYCKIVK I.. VUKI • • • 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, MONDAY, MAY 7, 1956 8:00 O'CLOCK P.M. The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, came on for hearing at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m., the following members of the City Council being present: JAY.D. BROWN, MAYOR JAMES W. KAY, VICE MAYOR J. DALE PITTRNGER, COUNCILMAN WAYNE CRUMLEY, COUNCILMAN• VERNON R. MOTTINGER, COUNCILMAN CLIFFORD G. PETRIE, CITY MANAGER ROBERT FLOTTEN, CITY CLERK T. G. CORNYN, CITY ATTORNEY DAN C. MARSHALL, SPECIAL COUNSEL THE MAYOR: Annexation District Number 138. Do you have a report to give us on that, Mr. Cornyn? MR. CORNYN: I have a resolution. It is the resolu- tion of the City Council of the City of West Covina terminating proceedings with respect to northerly Annexation District No. 138. "The City Council of the City of West Covina does resolve as follows: i 1 • 2. 3 4 6 \`1s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 • • 13 14 16 16 17 13 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 WW1 fi I VMAid R a C nr...-... Oro -e C..rr.- 2 "Section 1. On March 26, 1956, said City Council adopted its Resolution No. 909 declaring its intention to call a special annexation election in certain uninhabited territory, as more particularly described therein and therein designa- ted and identified as "Northerly Annexation District No. 138," and fixing a time and place for protest by property owners. Said resolution gave notice that on the 23rd day of April, 1956, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the City Hall of the City of West Covina, any person owning real property so proposed to be annexed and having any objection to the proposed annexation might appear before said City Council and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. Section 2. Said City.Council hereby finds that substantial protests were filed not later than the hour set for hearing objections pursuant to said notice. Said City Council further hereby finds that it will not be in the best interests of said terri- tory and the owners and residents therein or the City of West Covina to proceed with said proposed annexation. Section 3. Said annexation proceedings are hereby terminated, without the necessity of calling said special election. ' I WM. G. LYMAN, C. S. R. , OFFICIAL REPORTER SUPERIOR COURT 0, 1 • 2 3 4 6 G0\ I* • • 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution." If the Council wishes to do so it may move the adoption of this resolution. COUNCILMAN KAY: I so move.. COUNCILMAN CRUMLEY: Second -the motion. .THE MAYOR: May we have a roll call. (A roll call was had and the motion was carried unanimously.) THE MAYOR: I believe you have .another resolution submitted by the Council. Annexation District 139, held over from the meeting of April: 9, 1956, and continued to April 23rd of 1956. MR. CORNYN: Yes, it is the resolution of the City Council of the.City of West Covina terminating proceedings with respect to northerly annexation district No. 139. "The City Council of the City of West Covina does.resolve as follows: .Section 1. On February 20, 1956, said City Council adopted its Resolution No. 891 declaring its intention to call a special annexation election in certain uninhabited territory, as more particu- larly described therein and therein designated and identified as 'Northerly Annexation District No. 1391.' and fixing a time and place for protest by property owners. Said resolution gave notice that wu r_ . vue..... .v---ram.. m.e�e...e r.,..e.. 1 • 2 3 4 6 • i • 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 "on the 26th day of March, 1956, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the City Hall of the City of West Covina, any person owning real property so proposed to be annexed and having any objection to the proposed annexation might appear before said City Council and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. Section 2. Said City Council hereby finds that substantial protests were filed not later than the hour set for hearing objections pursuant to said notice. Said City Council further hereby finds that it will not be in the best interests of said territory and the owners and residents therein or the City of West Covina to proceed with said proposed annexation. Section 3. Said annexation proceedings are hereby terminated without the necessity of calling said special election. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. COUNCILMAN PITTFNGER: Move we adopt that resolution. COUNCILMAN MOTTINGER: Second the motion. THE MAYOR: Call the roll. (A roll call was had and the motion was carried unanimously.) WM. G. LYMAN, C. S. R. , OFFICIAL REPORTER SUPERIOR COURT .0 is O 1 2 3 4 6 6 7. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 0 SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. I, WM. G. LYMAN, Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, in and for the County - of ' Los Angeles, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct transcript of the proceedings had during the progress of subject hearings on Annexation Districts 138, and 139. Dated this llth day of May, 1956 i Official ReposC.S.R.