Loading...
10-10-1955 - Regular Meeting - MinutesMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA October 10, 1955 Meeting was called to order by Mayor Hurst at 8:15 p.m. at the West Covina City Hall. 1. Present: Mayor Hurst, Councilmen Kay, Van Horn, Brown, Sperline. Absent: City Treasurer Others: City Engineer, City Clerk, and City Administrator, City Attorney, M. Gerschler, Planning Dept.; Mr. Nollac, Sanitation Dept. Engineer. MINUTES APPROVED Minutes of regular meeting of City Council on September 26; 1955, were approved as submitted. Minutes of ad- journed regular meeting of October 3, 1955, were corrected to show on first item, page 5, "Rule 57tt, Outside Open Burning" instead of "Rule 54". Minutes were approved as corrected. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. ITEM NOT ON AGENDA Mr. Jennings; Chairman of the Citizens League of West Covina stated that on"October 5, 1955, the West Covina Citizens League drew up petition calling for adoption of ordinance for creation of City Manager, a copy of which was mailed'to members of the City Council on October 6. Mr. Jennings stated that there had'been most deliberate consideration given to the drafting of this ordinance and reviewed by two attorneys experienced in municipal law. We are prepared to secure sufficient signatures to place this proposal before public for adoption and feel it will serve the best interests of City to adopt this ordinance so Council can proceed with obtaining City Manager. Mayor Hurst stated that this matter would be designated on Agenda as Item No. 32. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS City Clerk presented and read letter from the Mayor of . the City of Azusa extending an invitation to attend Azusa's Golden Days Parade on October 15, 1955, at 2:00 p.m., with special grand- stand seating to be available for members of Council and their families. City Clerk presented and read communication from Paul B. Salmon, District Super- intendent of Covina School District thanking City for recent action taken to protect children attending Traweek School. City Clerk stated that he had copy of affidavit of publication of notice in regard to matter referred to by Mr. Jennings, Chairman of Citizens League of West Covina. ANNEXATION NO. 134 Mayor Hurst stated that this is the time and place for Tenmen Enterprises, Inc. public hearing on Annexation No. 134. Location: north APPROVED of Cameron Avenue and east of'Barranca Street. Approxi- materly 6.5 acres. Maps presented by City Engineer. Mr. Gerschler stated that recommendation from Planning Commission was that this be approved provided that strip 52¢ wide by 300t long be excluded from annexation. No testimony presented, hearing declared closed. R -2- cc 10/10/55 Annexation No. 134--contd. Councilman Kayo When this matter went before Boundaries Commission, did it include strip in it at that time? Has it been recertified to exclude this strip? City Attorney: Believe it was recertified and resubmitted to Boundaries Commission on basis of not including the 52 x .300 ft. strip and in that case you may consider this map tonight. Sanitation Engrg Mr. Nollac stated that in conjunction with annexation request re- quirement that area be annexed to Sanitation District No. 22, prior • to completion of annexation. i City Engineer stated that file on Annexation District No. 134 included the"'following items: 1) proper petition for annexation i 2) statement of applicant's willingness to accept City's bonded indebtedness 3) certified copy of revised description from Boundary Commission 4) affidavit of posting; 5) affidavit of contiguous territory 6) affidavits of publishing by Pasadena -'Star News and West Covina Tribune 7) affidavit of compliance by CityCl.erk ' 8) letter from registrar of voters Motion 'by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried, that Annexation No. 134 be approved subject to annexation under Rml Area District IV, that it be annexed to Sanitation District No. 22 prior .to completion of annexation district. PRECISE PLAN NO. 27 (Revised) Mayor Hurst stated that this is the time and place Eugene L. & Louise E. Wood for public hearing on Precise Plan No. 27 (Revised). APPROVED Location: SW corner of California Avenue and Garvey . Avenue.. Maps were presented by City Engineer. Mr. Gerschler read Resolution. No. 296 of the Planning Commission recommending approval of Precise Flan No. 27 (Revised). All those wishing to present testimony were sworn in by City Clerk. Mr. Eugene L. Wood of 191 E. Rowland Avenue spoke in' favor, stating that original Precise Plan revised to provided more return on property. • Location for service station in relation to highway makes it excessively good for traffic coming o££ freeway.and advantageous to City., and ground allotted to it is small. Have reduced size of buildings to provide adequate parking in compliance with rules and regulations of the City. No further testimony; hearing declared closed. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Sperline, and carried, that Precise Plan No. 27 (Revised) be approved subject to recommendations of Planning Commission and to requirements of_Cut and Fill Ordinance No. 384. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes'g Councilmen Kay, Van Horn, Brown, Sperline, Hurst. Noes: None Absent: None -2- -3- CC 10/10/55 PRECISE PLAN NO. 58 Mayor Hurst stated that this is the time and place for public and hearing on Precise Plan No. 58 and Zone Change No. 52. ZONE CHANGE N0.52 Location: SE corner of Azusa Avenue and Larkwood Avenue. Siegel-Constr. Co. Request R-P. Maps were presented by City Engineer. Mr. Gerschler DENIED read Resolutions No. 288 and 289 of the Planning Commission recommending disapproval of Precise Flan No. 58 and Zone Change No. 52. All those wishing to present testimony were sworn in by City Clerk. City Clerk presented and read communication of appeal from Stephen W. Cunningham & Associ- ates, Inc., per -Mr. Edward J. Till, dated September 13, 19555 which stated that it was an erroneous assumptidn-on the part of Planning Commission in that there was no justification for any other than R-1 use in area. Because of -the fact that property immediately to the west will be developed to an elementary school.and property immedi- ately to the south will be developed to a church, both as permitted with Zone R-2 under City's ordinance. Letter further stated that there was sufficient area to not qualify as -a "spot zoning" and that it is unreasonable that residents within community adjacent to a_church and elementary school should have to travel approximately one mile to the north, two miles to the west and several miles to the south in order to arrive at an area where medical -dental needs can be met. Mr. E. J. Till of 3727 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, stated that as pointed out in letter read by City Clerk that are circumstances that merit Council's consideration, particularly that there are no medical or dental services available in this immediate area, and.,feel there is a demand for this type of servicing. Councilman Kay: Is .your proposed usage medical usage only? Mr. Till: Yes, it is not commercial under any sense of the word. Plans pre- pared for this area are as near to residential as possible, with no garish advertisements. Do not believe there will be any disturbance to TV or radio because of use of electrical apparatus for medical practice, and feel Azusa Avenue is fast becoming undesirable for residential purposes., Mr. I. Siegel of 560 S. Fenimore St., Covina, stated: 'Want to explain reasons why we have applied for rezoning of these lots. I.am not going to say no one can live on lots on Azusa but it has been proven that houses fronting on Azusa are less desirable. First house built in this development was at Azusa and Cortez in 1954. At that time Azusa did not carry much traffic and there was not a great deal of development to the south.. After home had been complete we realized that opposition of public to living on heavily trafficked thoroughfare was very great. Development of these lots for • buildings serving doctors and dentists is not going to be detrimental to the surround- ing area, and this type of usage has been shown to work out in other areas of City, case in point is at Irwindale and Rowland, with no damage or annoyance to surrounding neighborhood. Mr. R. Reynolds of 1925 E. Larkwood spoke in opposition, presenting to City Clerk for the record petition in opposition of those property owners adjacent to this area. Mr. Reynolds stated that -this would be the only block.on east side of Azusa that would have any business in it at all, all the rest is residential. Thought it would be residential R-1 when purchased property and cannot see any reason to change it now. City Clerk read petition opposing this change which contained some 30 names. Mr. D. Lawson of 642 S. Cajon stated that property owner on east side of Azusa Avenue, just south of Mr. Siegel's property tried to secure a zone variance for similar pur- pose and was turned down. If a change of zone is granted in this case, or variance issued, this party will immediately reapply for a change also, and would like to know on what grounds you could make one variance and refuse another. -3- • • o4- cc 1OA0155 PP #58 & ZC #52--contd. Mr. Till-. We never alleged that property could not be used for single family resident purposes but that this type of improvement is more desirable and would bring more to the City than three single family residences which would not be as desirable in this locality. I still feel there is a need within the community in the area for a project of this type. No further testimony; hearing declared closed. Councilman Kay: I am inclined to agree with the opposition in that at time of subdivision it was Rml and that while we have granted this type of zoning on Azusa it was done prior to zoning. Councilman Sperline: Since the time we granted -any R-P zoning north of Garvey we have gone over completely, our overall zoning map in detail as to where to allow this type of zoning in the city. I am inclined to go with those in opposition and Planning Commission. Councilman Brown, Ifeel I must go along with Planning Commission. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Van Horn, and carried, that Precise Plan. No. 58 and Zone Change No. 52, upholding the decision of the Planning Commission., be denied. DATE SET FOR HEARINGS Precise Plan. No. 53 (Revised) and Zone Change No.47 Precise Flan No. 62 and Zone Change No.57 Precise Plan No. 60 Zone Change No.53 and Zone Variance No. 158 Zone Change No.38 Unclassified Use Permit No. 10 and Precise Plan No. 44 Hearings were set for regular meeting of October 24, 19559 on the following'. Herbert W. Ross., applicant. 'Location: south side of Garvey Avenue between Orange and Sunkist Avenues. Arthur J. Stinton, applicant. Location: NE corner of Azusa and Puente Avenues. Sidney Pink, -'applicant. Location-. east side of Glendora Avenue,, south of Walnut Creek Wash. Sponseller & S'ons, applicant. Location: NE corner of Irwindale Avenue and Garvey Avenue. Appealed to City Council at adjourned regular meeting of October 39 1955. -4- -5- cc 1OA0155 SECOND READING Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by .Councilman Sperline., ORDINANCE Nc? 425 and carried, that second and final reading be given to Precise Plan No.39 Ordinance No. 425 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE ADOPTED CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN SAID CITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 14 OF ORDINANCE NO. 147 OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, AND AMENDING SAID ORDINANCE NO. 147 (Varney)." Location: SE corner of Rowland Avenue and Azusa Avenue. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Kay, and carried, that reading of the body of the ordinance be waived. Motion by Councilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman Kay., that Ordinance No. 425 be adopted. Passed on roll call as follows: • Ayes: Councilmen Kay, Brown, Sperline, Van Horn, Hurst. Noes: None Absent: None SECOND READING Motion by Councilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman Van Horn, ORDINANCE NO. 425 and carried., that second and final reading be given to Ordinance Precise Plan No. 55 No. 427 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST ADOPTED COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN.PROPERTIES IN SAID CITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 14 OF ORDINANCE NO. 147 OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, AND AMENDING SAIDORDINANCE NO. 147 (E. G. Hotchkiss)." Location: east side of Glendora Avenue.and north side of Vine Avenue. Motion by Councilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman'Kay, and carried, that reading of the body of the ordinance be waived. Motion by Councilman Sperline., seconded by Councilman Van Horn, and carried, that Ordinance No. 427 be adopted. Passed on roll call as follows. - Ayes., Councilmen Kay, Van Horn, Brown, Sperline., Hurst. Noes., None Absent: None SECOND READING Motion by'"Councilman Brown., seconded by Councilman Kay,and ORDINANCE NO. 428 carried, that second and final reading be given to Ordinance Precise Plan No. 26 No. 428 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST (Revised) COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ADOPTED OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN SAID CITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION,14 OF ORDINANCE NO. 147 OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, AND AMENDING SAID ORDINANCE'NO. 147. (Shulman)" Location: south of Garvey Ave., and west of California Ave. Motion by Councilman Brown., seconded by Councilman Kay., and carried, that reading of the body of -the ordinance be waived. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Sperline, and carried, that Ordinance No. 428 be adopted. Passed on roll call as follows Ayes: Councilman Brown, Sperline, Hurst, Van Horn, Kay. Noes: None Absent: None -5- cc 1OA0155 FIRST READING City Attorney presented and read Ordinance No. 429 "AN ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 429 OF THE CITY 'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, Precise Plan No,, 19 ADOPTING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES (Revised) IN SAID CITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 14 OF ORDINANCE: -NO. 147 OF THE CITY OF --WEST COVINA, AND AMNDING SAID ORDINANCE NO. 147 (Chet)" Location: SW corner of Garvey and Azusa Avenues. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Van Horn, and carried, that Ordinance No. 429 be given its first reading. - FIRST READING City Attorney presented and read Ordinance No. 430 "AN ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 430 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, Precise Plan No. 55 ADOPTING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN SAID CITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 14 OF ORDINANCE NO. 147 OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, AND AMENDING SAID ORDINANCE NO. 147 (Lawyer)" Location: south side of Francisquito Avenue between Sunset and California Avenues. Motion by Council- man Sperline, seconded by Councilman Kay, and carried, that Ordinance No. 430 be given its first reading. (Councilman Van Horn voting "No", Councilman Hurst "Not Voting") FIRST READING City Attorney presented and read 'Ordinance No. 431 "AN ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO.-431- OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, Zone Change No. 56 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 147 OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND CHANGING THE ZONING MAP ATTACHED THERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF (Bandy)"- Lo ac tion: east side of Glendora Avenue between Dalewood Street and Walnut Creek Parkway. Motion by Councilman Brown seconded by Councilman Kay, and carried,.that Ordinance No. 431 be given its first reading. RESOLUTION NO. 805 City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 805 accepting ACCEPT BOND Royal,Indemnity 'Company Bond No. 507757 in the amount of STREET IMPROVEMENTS $49500.00 to -guarantee street improvements in accordance with Precise :Plan No. 38 Precise Plan No-, 38 of -Frank Smith. Location NW owner ADOPTED of Azusa Avenue and Rowland Avenue. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Kay, and carried, that Resolution No. 805 be adopted. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kay, Van Horn, Hurst, Sperline, Brown, Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 806 City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 806 accepting ACCEPT BOND - Founder's Insurance Co. Bond No. 13660 in the amount of Sanitary Sewer Constr.$3,500.00 to guarantee construction of Sanitary Sewers in. Tract No.. 21159 . Tract No. 21159. Location° south side of Rowland Avenue east ADOPTED of Azusa -Avenue. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Kay, and carried, that Resolution No. 806 be adopted. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes-. Councilmen Brown, Sperline, Hurst, Van Horn, Kay Noes: None Absent: None 11 9 -7m cc 10/10/55 RESOLUTION.NO. 807 City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 807 ACCEPT BOND accepting Pacific Employers Insurance Co. Bond No. Street Improvements 11-Bm48136 in the amount of '18,400.00 to guarantee Tract No. g aIA S/$ street improvements in Tract No. 21288. Location: ADOPTED north side of Francisquito Ave.. between Glendora and Councilman Brown, and call as follows: ,Ayes: Councilmen Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 808 ACCEPT EASEMENT Sanitary Sewers ADOPTED Walnut Avenues. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by carried, that Resolution No. 807 be adopted. Passed on roll Kay, Brown, Van Horn, Sperline, Hurst. east of Azusa Ave.) Motion that Resolution No. 808 be Ayes: Councilmen Kay, Noes: None Absent: None RESOLLUTION NO. 809 Fixing Time and Method Of Paying Officers and Employees of City ADOPTED roll call as follows: City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 808 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL -OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF WEST COVINA ('Covina School District, Sanitary sewer easement, Workman School site., north side Workman Ave. by Councilman Van'Horn, seconded by Councilman Kay, adopted. Passed on roll call as follows: Van Horn, Hurst, Sperline,.Brown. City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 809 ."A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA., CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE TIME AND METHOD OF PAYING OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES -OF SAID CITY." Motion by Coun- cilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman Van Horn, and carried, that Resolution No. 809 be adopted. Passed on Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Sperline, Hurst, Van Horn, Kay. Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 810 City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 810 .ACCEPT DEED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST Street & Highway Purposes COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY ADOPTED PURPOSES CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY HERETOFORE GRANTED AND CONVEYED TO SAID CITY." (18 lot 42 Tract.No. 21509, Mullender Ave. for access to Tract No; 21288) Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Kay, that Resolution No. 810 be adopted. Passed on roll, call as follows - Ayes: Councilmen Kay, Sperline, Brown, Van Horn, Hurst. Noes: None Absent: None 7 C� cc 10/10/55 RESOLUTION NO. 811 City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 811, ACCEPT DEED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE XITY OF -WEST Street & Highway Purposes COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY HERETOFORE GRANTED AND ADOPTED CONVEYED TO SAID CITY." Motion by Councilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman Brown, that Resolution No. 811 be adopted. (Resolution covers le Lot No. 13 of Tract No. 2I042, Emily Drive, for access to Tract No. 22142) Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kay, Sperline, Brown, Van Horn, Hurst, Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 812 City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 812 ACCEPT DEED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST Street & Highway Purposes COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT DEEDS COVERING ADOPTED REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF WEST COVINA FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES (H. R. Utech)" (Service Road and alley. Precise Flan for Cm1 Central Business District, southeast side Glendora. Ave.) Motion by Councilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman Kay, that Resolution No. 812 be adopted. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kay, Sperline, Van Horn, Brown, Hurst. Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 813 City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 813 ACCEPT DEED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST Street & Highway Purposes COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT DEEDS COVERING REAL ADOPTED PROPERTY TO THE CITY -OF WEST COVINA FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES (Hotchkiss)."' (Preci.se Plan No. 55, alley area and Glendora Ave. widening.) Motion by -Councilman Van Horn, seconded by Councilman Kay, and carried, that Resolution No. 813 be adopted. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Sperline, Hurst, Van Horn, Kay. Noes: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 814 City Attorney presented and read Resolution No. 814 ACCEPT DEED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST Street & Highway Purposes COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT DEEDS COVERING REAL ADOPTED PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF WEST COVINA FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES (Wong).81 (Service Road and alley, Cml Precise Plan, Central Business District. southeast side Glendora Ave.) Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Kay, that Resolution No. 814 be adopted. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kay, Van Horn, Hurst, Sperline, Brown. Noes: None Absent. None -8- CC` 10/10/55 QUITCLAIM DEED City Attorney presented and read Quitclaim Deed. City Engineer Hotchkiss stated that this deed releases grant deed to alley area Zone Yariance No. 63, location east side of Glendora Ave., north of Vine Avenue made on October 6, 1953, in favor of new locality which was accepted by Resolution No. 813.this evening; Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Kay, and carried, that authorization be given to Mayor and City Clerk to execute this Quitclaim Deed. Passed on Roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Sperline,•Hurst, Van Horn, Kayo Noes- None Absent: None • AMBULANCE SERVICE CityAttorney resented and read Ambulance Service Agreement., y P g s AGREEMENT covering ambulance service in the City of West Covina. Motion Means by 'Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Kay, and carried, APPROVED that the Mayor and City Administrator be authorized to execute this agreement. Passed on -roll call as follows:, Ayes,. Councilmen Kay, Van Horn, Hurst, Brown, Sperline. Noes: None Absent: None TENTATIVE MAP Tentative Maps of Tract No. 19768 (Revised) were presented by Tract No. 19768 City Engineer. Location: southeasterly side of Orange Ave. (Revised),' between Francisqui.to Avenue and southerly City boundary. 11.5 Gilbert Jo Martain acres, 41 lots; Area District -II. Planning Commission re - Construction .Co. commends approval subject to -following conditions: APPROVED 1) That all lots conform to Area District II requirements. 2) That all street improvements outlined in Section 49 of Ordinance No. 225, including utilities, be installed accordingly and meet the approval of the City Engineer. • 3) That subdivider request opening of 1 ft. lots at'south end of Lang Avenue, Conlon Avenue, and Tonopah Avenue in Tract.No, 19380. 4) That a 11 lot along the south side of Delvale Street be deeded to the City of West Covina in fee simple. 5) That a drainage letter be provided from property owner south of subject tract if it s intended to drain water south on Tonopah Avenue. 6) That sanitary sewers be provided and meet the approval of the City Engineer. Motion by Councilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried, that Tentative Map of Tract No. 19768 (Revised) be approved subject to recommendations of City Engineer and Planning Commission. cc 1OA0j55 TENTATIVE MAP Tentative Maps of Tract No. 22004 were presented by City Engineer. Tract No. 22004 Location: NE corner of Azusa Avenue.and Vine Avenue. 962 acres, Albert Handler 33 lots., Area District II -A. City Engineer stated Planning APPROVED Dommission has changed recommendation in regard to alley. I had recommended alley carry through to 11B1.1 Street but Planning Commission changed that to include turnaround at end of alley and it is my feeling that this not good design nor good from standpoint of Fire or Police aid if needed. Mr. Nollac., Sanitation Engineer, stated that he would recommend sanitary sewers if Cameron Avenue sewer trunk line were availabb in six months for hookup. • Mr. H. L. Johnson stated, on the extension of the alley, being it is desirable for planning purposes, we would prefer to have it come out to Azusa Avenue rather than through individual street. Prefer it along rear of lot. Object to requirement.of a drainage easement which is seemingly for benefit on private property entirely to the east and serves no purpose to our subdivision. There was consideration to taRe drainage northward. City Engineer stated, proposed easement between Lots No. 6 and 7. At the time we were discussing this amongst departments we did not know.provisions had been made that Tract No. 20935 was to take care od drainage from school property. I would recommend leave drainage easement requirement in, subject to evidence that such an easement is provided through Tract No. 20935. Motion 'by Councilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried, that Tentative Map of Tract No. 22004 be approved subject to recommendations of City Engineer and Planning Commission, but to include following changes: 80 drainage easement be provided along Lot No. 7 unless provision has been made in Tract No. 20935 to drain proposed school site, existing alley in Tract No. 20121 be extended southerly into "B" Street with Lots 1 through 13 reduced to compensate for 20' alley requirements if necessary, and to include requirements of Ordinance No. 384. TENTATIVE MAP Tentative Maps of Tract No. 22196 presented by City Engineer. Tract No. 22196 Location: north of Rowland Avenue, between Lark Ellen and Azusa L. R. Gieselman Avenues. u acres, 14 lots, Area District II. Mr.. Gerschler read APPROVED recommendations of City Engineer as follows: 1) That all lots conform to Area District II requirements. 2) That all street improvements outlined in Section 49 of Ordinance No. 225, including utilities, and sanitary sewers be installed accordingly and meet the approval of the City Engineer. 3) That subdivider request opening of 1° lot at the westerly end of Pioneer Drive. 4) That 19 lots at the northerly end of "A" Street and the easterly end of Pioneer Drive be deeded to the City of West Covina in fee simple. Motion by Councilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried, that Tenta- tive Map of Tract No. 22196 be approved subject to -recommendations of City Engineer and Planning.Commission and to include Ordinance No. 384 regulations. _10- cc 10j10/55 FINAL MAP Final Maps of Tract No.21288. were presented by City Engineer. Tract No.,21288. Location: north side of Francisqui.to Avenue between Glendora Sunset Manor Co. Avenue and Valinda Avenue. 8.5 acres, 34 lots, Area District II - APPROVED Mr. Nollac, Sanitation Engineer, stated that sewers were re- quired; plans all ready to be signed. This particular tract was outside of Sanitation District but the sewer plans will not be signed until pro- ceedings are completed to annex to the seder district, City Engineer recommended approval subject to Receipt of Title Report and Sanitation Engineer's condition. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried, that Final Map of Tract No. 21288 be approved subject to City Engineer's and Sanitation Engineer's conditions. • STREET IMPROVEMENTS City Engineer read recommendations which are a combination of FOR HILLSIDE AREAS recommendations from him and acting Director of Public Works, Area District IV as follows: APPROVED 1) Major Streets - 100 ft. ROW ® Full standard street improvement required. 2) Secondary Streets - 80 ft. ROW - Full standard street improvement required. 3) Collector Streets - 60 ft. ROW - Full standard street improvement required. 4) Local Streets - 50 ft. ROW - Minimum (See Typical Section A-107) a) Use 28 ft. asphaltic concrete pavement on aggregate base as shown on Typical Section A-:107. b) Grade on shoulder beyond curb - 1" per ft. for distance of 5 ft. c) For rest of ROW -use 1 to 1-cut slope and for 11 to 1 .fill slope. d) Use concrete curb and 12" gutter.on all streets. e) Use concrete curb and 24" gutter on all curb return sections. f) Use concrete cross gutters. g) When said streets are proposed to carry off more than 20 cu. ft, per second storm water drainage (10 year frequency - Rational formula) provide other approved means of removing storm water drainage from streets by use of storm drains, pipes9 and drainage structures. .h) Minimum horizontal curve radius m 100 ft. • i) Minimum vertical sight distance - 300 ft. with.provision for a minimum 200 ft. landing strip between two descending grades, landing strip grade not to exceed 3%. j) Maximum street grade not to exceed 10% except b6 special permission by City Council or their Safety Committee under extraordinary circumstances. No street grade to exceed 15%. k) Maximum grade on cul de sac portion of street - 3% 1) Cul de sac radius at property line - minimum, 40 ft. m) Cul de sac curb radius - minimum.- 30 ft.- n) Install street lights at, intersections and install street lights at other points as designated by City Engineer. o) On all fills or cuts 5 ft. or more in vertical height, plant surface of slope with approved type of vegetation.to control erosion, ai des, etc. 5) Dedicate slope easements on Final Map wherever necessary. 6) Install street name signs at all intersections. =•11� . -12- cc 1OA0155 Hillside ,Area Street Improvements--contd. Councilman Sperlineo I am wondering about point in these conditions regarding street lights at intersections and other points as designated by City Engineer. If we had a maximum or minimum distance for these in these recommendations I believe it might eliminate any future developments. You might have a block, because of necessity, 1000 to 1500 ft. long. Perhaps we will need lighting at least every 400 or 500 feet. Police Department feels that adequate lighting in areas are very essential. Councilman Van Horn.* Not knowing what these -distances may be this should be de- signated by City -Engineer just where they should goo • Councilman Kay: I do not think these hillside areas want to see lights like in the City. Need at curves, intersections, but to require lights every 300 or 400 feet is going to nullify effects of rural type development. I feel lights would only be where demanded for safety, except intersections where they would be needed. Councilman Hurst.* I believe we should pass this and perhaps Police Dept. could come up with something that we can all go along with, then we may be able to change this instead of just using the judgment of City Engineer regarding lighting. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Kay, that the Recommendations for Street Improvements - Area District IV Hillside -Subdivisions be approved and adopted as specifications applicable to the development of hillside properties in Area District IV (residential) and that all developers be required to comply in all respects with these regulations. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Hurst, Brown, Van Horn, Kay. Noes: Councilman Sperlineo Absent: None. CITY PROJECT NO.C-23 City Engineer stated, City improvement project in which ACCEPT STREET IMPROVEMENTS we undertook to provide curb and gutters on Meeker, a Meeker Ave. street already developed b y residences. We sent out DISAPPROVED letters early in planning stage and asked cooperation of • owners along street to put in improvements at rate of $1.35 per front foot which we estimated would pay for curb and gutters. Some two years has elapsed since starting and completion. There were more signatures than payments and we wrote another letter telling people we could not pave their property unless payment of cost of this work was forthcoming. We let contract on basis of only six lots not paid. Contractor has completed contract and we recommend on that basis we accept street improvements according to contract and authorize release of Performance, Labor, and Material Bond No. 323399 written by General Casualty Co. of America and authorize release of amount of final payment of $533.23. A motion to -authorize release of $533.23 for improvements done on Meeker Avenue was withdrawn. Councilman Brown: The road is raveling already and it is not up to specifications. Do not feel it should be accepted for the City of West Covina. -12- ®13m cc 10/10/55 Project Cm23--contd. Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Brown, that City Project No. Cm23, Street Improvements Meeker Avenue., -be held over pending report of impartial group of experts or companies to be selected by City Administrator to check improvements on Meeker Avenue to see if it conforms with specifications. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Hurst, Brown, Van Horn, Kay. Noes: Councilman Sperline. Absent: None • SIDEWALKS OVER WALNUT Report of City Engineer regarding sidewalks over Walnut Creek CREEK WASH Wash held over pending'more information to be received from HELD OVER County. LOT FEES ON PRECISE Report of Planning Department recommendations for Lot Fees on PLANS Precise Plans was read by Mr. Gerschler as follows: It would appear to be impractical -from t,be standpoint of administrative procedure to levy and collect lot fees on Precise Plans for the following reasons: The amount of the fee would have'to be set either on an acreage basis, on the estimated value of proposed improvements or as a flat fee for each approved plan. A fee based on acreage.would be difficult to re- concile when past or future subdivisions would require the payment of $25.00 per lot, under the provisions of Ordinance No. 225. A fee based on the estimated value of improvements would not be prat- tical.becaus.e.it would....tend....to inequitably assess those property owners least responsible.for the need for -park facilities. It would also be a cumbersome and time consuming task to'arrive at the actual amount of the fee to be charged. A flat fee for each approved plan would be the simplest method, admin- istratively, if it were possible to integrate such a fee with the system now being emp]Wed under the Subdivision Ordinance. • The conclusions which may be drawn from this are; that whatever method of assessment is employed, it should not conflict with the procedure presently being followed in the case of Subdivisions and it must 'be equitable to those being assessed. Under a separate report which will be submitted at an early date, I will attempt to outline the necessity of requiring the filing of a Subdivision,or Record of Survey Map for each lot split in the Multiple Family, Professional Commercial or Manufacturing Zones and also the advantages gained by requiring the filing of a Certificate of Survey for each approved Precise Plan. If the City of West Covina were to levy their established lot fee, presently 25.00 on each Certificate of Survey, the result would be, in my opinion, a fair, equitable and practical manner by which the problem of lot fees on Precise Plans could be accomplished. -13- _14- r� U • CC 10%10/55 Lot Fees on Precise Plans--contd. It is therefore the recommendation of be given to the question of requiring mercial properties, and then applying Ordinance to provide the collection of the Manning Department Subdivision Maps, etc., the existing provisions lot fees. 'that first thought in the case of . com® of the Subdivision REPORTS OF City Administrator stated that ordinances covering the new,,'personnel-- ADMINISTRATOR system and the City Manager had been. 'prepare.d by the City Hai �"'staff, and presented to the Cit4 Council for their review. I now understand that an ordinance has been presented by the Citizens° League regarding the City Manager°s position, and I recommend that the City Council meet and review these 3 items as soon as possible.in view of the fact that we have now completed our review of applicants for this position. There have been approximately 20 applicants of which 6 only meet the qualifications established by the City Council. I recommend that the Council review the applications as soon as possible so that we may notify the applicants when they may appear for their personal interview. We shouldclave the City Manager's ordinance and the personnel system ordinance resolved so'irtrha"t when the new officer comes in he will have an ordinance to conform too Mr. Nollac, Sanitation Engineer, who is the USNR is now required to take his two week training cruise with the U. So Navy and has inquired with respect to his pay. In checking we find that most employers pay the difference between what a man gets from the U. So Government and what his pay is. Ino Mr. Nollaces case this would amount to approximately $70.00 and I would recommend we pay Mr. Nollac the difference between government pay and City pay. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Kay, and carried, that the recommendation of City Administrator that Mr. Nollac be paid the difference between his government pay and City pay be approved. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Noes: Absen t: Councilmen"Hurst, Sperline, Brown, Van Horn, Kay. None None City Administrator stated..that.notice has been received from County Boundaries Commission giving notice of proposal filed b y City of Covina on "North Annexation District No. 27" to be annexed to Covina. This area is in the northeast section of Covina. Recommend no objection. No action necessary. City Administrator read communication from Frank J. Weiss, Attorney, 1012 E. Hunting- ton Drive, Arcadia, requesting on the behalf of Mr. & Mrs. William Killian, of 1311 E. Thackery St., West Covina, that permission be granted to allow the Killians to continue raising Chinchillas on'their-property for a period of six months and that the Building Dept. be authorized to allow,the Edison 'Co. to hook up the new wiring, if the wiring passes inspection, to prevent loss of these valuable animals. Killians had purchased this property in September of 1954 for purpose of raising chinchllas upon representation by the former owner and broker that the property was zoned Aml, and they were not aware of proper zoning until new wiring was inspected and actual zoning was pointed out to them. Motion by Councilman Van Horn, seconded by Councilman Sperline, that the Building Dept. be authorized to approve installation of wiring to be used for a period not to exceed six (6) months. Passed on roll call as follows: Ayes< Noes Absent: Councilmen Hurst, Van Horn, Sperline, Kay, Brown. None None -14- m15 CC 10/10/55 City Admin. reports--contd. City Administrator read communication from Acting Director of Public Works to East San Gabriel Valley Planning Committee recommending that this Committee recommend to East San Gabriel Valley City Engineers that they commence necessary studies for priority lists for special improvement projects as early as possible as planning for budgeting of funds for Los Angeles County Dept. for 1956-57 has already commenced. City Administrator read communication from Mr. Harold Johnson in regard to possi- bility of spending new -Section 1890 Planning Funds for purpose of developing road • plans on Service Ave. along the Civic Center. Also discussed with Mr. Cramer,, the City and County Projects Engineer for State -Highway to have this portion of Service Avenue declared a street of major importance so City could progrgm State Gas Tax Funds for the construction thereof. -Need of vicinity, map,, typical cross section., and an estimated'A.D.T. count to -justify approval of Service Avenue for street of major importance, and how it ties into Sunset Avenue, a major street. Form will be sent and Mr. Johnson feels this should be taken care of at once by Engineering Dept. City Administrator presented and read report of Col. Wetherby regarding use of Civil Defense Building and Police Department report. Councilman Kayo I have a matter which I feel should be brought out. We had a case tonight regarding curb and gutters and I believe that policies of the Council regarding things of this nature should have Resolutions written up so that such matters are routine when they come before use thus, we -would -not need to trust to memory each time. Various departments should prepare Resolutions covering all matters of.policy so there.never will be any question in the future. REINSTATEMENT Motion by Councilman Sperline, seconded by Councilman Van. Sergeant Harless Smith Horn and carried., that Sergeant Harless Smith be reinstated APPROVED to the Police Force as he has now been cleared of accident charges, by law., for which he was suspended. RESOLUTION FOR Councilman Sperline referred communication to City Attorney • RULES & REGULATIONS with request that a resolution be drawn up covering Rules POLICE DEPBT. and Regulations in Police Dept. AUTHORIZE BIDS FOR Motion -by Councilman Brown,"b econded by Councilman Kay, and TRAILER carried9 that City Administrator be authorized to advertise for bids on trailer as per specifications to be drawn up. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS Motion by Councilman Kay, seconded by Councilman Sperline., and carried,, that payment of Claims and Demands be made subject to approval of Council Audit Committee. Passed on roll call as follows*. Ayes.- Councilmen Kay, Sperline, Van Horn., Hurst9 Brown. Noes- None Absent: None mi5o • 11 ®16- cc 10/10/55 CITY MANAGER ORDINANCE Mayor Hurst stated that there is a City Manager Ordinance drawn up by City staff and one been presented by Citizen's League and there will be a committee meeting to discuss this matter. Councilman Kays If we are going to -discuss proposed ordinance that has been hmcbd to us don't you think we should perhaps ask some of those who presented this ordinance to attend this committee meeting? Mayor Hurst:. I think we should first go through these ordinances then if you wish to bring others in that would be fine. Mr. Jennings: Citizens' League spent considerable amount of time on this ordinance and we wish the Council to adopt it as presented and include in the ordinance that it be offered to public for adoption at election in April next year. Mr. Swanson: Is it considered proper to hold a closed meeting'on the consideration of these ordinances? Mayor Hurst Study meetings are always in order as long as no decisions are made. Mr. Jett I am not familiar with this ordinance or committee that 1432 Danes Dr. adopted it but if they are notified of any meeting that you are going to consider adopting a resolution or ordinance they propose I wish to be present. Suggestion was made that perhaps copies of ordinance drawn up by City staff could be sent to Citizens' League for perusal. City Administrator stated this could be done. Meeting. adjourned --at 11...p..m.- until... actober 17th at 8. p.m. RORERT FLOTTEN JOE HURST, MAYOR