Loading...
Resolution - 8090RESOLUTION NO.8090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 883 (J. L. Holmes) The City Council of the City of West Covina, California, does resolve as follows: WHEREAS, there was filed with the City of West Covina, certified applications on the forms prescribed in Chapter 26, • Article VI of the West Covina Municipal Code for the physical development of that certain property described as follows: Lot 45, Tract No. 33656; and WHEREAS, this variance is categorically exempt, Class 5, from the requirements of CEQA as a minor alteration of a side yard setback regulation which does not result in any changes in land use or density; and WHEREAS, hearings on said application were duly noticed and conducted by the Planning Commission on December 3, 1986, January 21, 1987, May 6, 1987, and August 5, 1987, at which time said application was denied; and WHEREAS, the action of the Planning Commission was appealed to the August 24, 1987, City Council meeting for hearing and consideration; and WHEREAS, after proper and legal notice the City Council held hearings on said Planning Commission action on August 24, 1987; and WHEREAS, the applicant presented sufficient evidence related to the case to show the following necessary findings for a variance have been met: a. There are exceptional circumstances not applicable generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone, in that 40 percent of the subject site is rendered unbuildable due to a downward slope on the rear of the lot. b. This variance is necessary for the enjoyment of the property right possessed by others in the same vicinity and zone to place accessory structures in an orderly and uncrowded manner, and to complement the architectural theme of the residential structure. C. Granting of a variance that has been found to be necessary for the enjoyment of property rights enjoyed by others and has exceptional circumstances to warrant the variance will • not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. d. zoning regulations are implemental tools of the General Plan. Approval of a variance found to be necessary, warranted by exceptional circumstances and found not to be detrimental through a public hearing as prescribed by the zoning regulations implements the General Plan. Therefore, the granting of the variance does not adversely affect the General Plan. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the findings and decision in Planning Commission Resolution No. 8-87-3559 be set aside and the City Council does hereby APPROVE the requested variance subject to the following conditions, the violation of any one (1) of which shall be grounds for revocation of variance by the Planning Commission or City Council: 1. Placement of the gazebo shall comply with Study Plan "A" dated December 3, 1986. 2. The gazebo depicted on Study Plan "A" shall be the only structure to encroach into the required ten -foot side yard. FINALLY RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution., ATTEST: ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 24th day of August, 1987. City Clerk I, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of August, 1987, by the following vote: . AYES: Councilmembers: Tennant, Manners, Chappell NOES: Councilmember: Shearer ABSENT: Councilmember: Bacon APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney DG�H_dp' City Clerk