Loading...
02-05-2002 - Adoption of a Resolution Supporting Proposition 42 "The Transportation Congestion Improvement Act"City of West Covina *Memorandum TO: Andrew G. Pasmant, City Manager and City Council FROM: Artie Fields Acting Finance Director Shannon A. Yauchzee Acting Public Works Director AGENDA ITEM NO. M-3 DATE February 5, 2002 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 42 "THE TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT" SUMMARY: Proposition 42 will help continue making city roads safer and reduce traffic without raising taxes. A coalition was formed by the League of California Cities to support Proposition 42. It is desired that the City of West Covina extend its support by the adoption of a resolution. BACKGROUND: Proposition 42, the Transportation Congestion Improvement Act, will be on the March 5, 2002 statewide ballot. Proposition 42 would continue the allocation of the existing State sales tax on gasoline to cities and counties which goes into the General Fund. Twenty percent of these revenues are earmarked for cities for local street repairs and maintenance. Twenty percent are earmarked for county streets and maintenance. Twenty percent are provided to public transit agencies and the remaining forty percent goes to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), which is primarily composed of locally identified projects. Proposition 42 is an important measure for all cities and counties as it would provide a much needed ongoing reliable source of funding for our streets, roads, and other local transportation projects. Proposition 42 is especially important -now as many .local transportation sales tax measures are set to expire over the next few years. Besides the League of California Cities, many law enforcement associations, fire chiefs, public safety officials, auto clubs, and others have joined this coalition to support a "Yes" vote on Proposition 42 on the March 5, 2002 ballot. DISCUSSION: In 2000, the Transportation Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) was enacted in California. Under this program, State gasoline sales tax revenues will be used from 2003-2004 through 2007-2008 for specified transportation purposes including highways, streets and roads, and transit improvements. Thereafter, these revenues will be available for various State purposes. Proposition 42 places in the State Constitution the provisions of the TCRP. In addition, the measure requires that starting in 2008-2009, these revenues continue to be used for State and local transportation purposes. These revenues would be allocated as follows: • Twenty percent to public transportation • Forty percent to transportation improvement projects funded in the State Transportation Improvement Program • Forty percent to local streets and roads improvements; with half of the amount (twenty percent) allocated to counties and half to cities. XAAGENDA - 2002\Adoption of Resolution Supporting Prop. 42.doc • • Andrew G. Pasmant, City Manager and City Council Page 2 — February 5, 2001 The measure authorizes the Legislature to modify this distribution of the revenues with a two- thirds vote. The measure also provides that the use of these revenues for transportation purposes can be suspended under specified conditions. The passage of Proposition 42 has numerous advantages some of which are: • Improve Highway, Bridge, and Street Safety California's once safe and beautiful highways are now the third most deteriorated roadways in the nation, and growing less safe by the day. More than 6,000 California bridges and overpasses are structurally deficient or no longer meet highway safety or design standards. Proposition 42 will provide desperately needed funds to help fix potholes and repair dangerous roads, highways, bridges, intersections, and school routes — in every city and county in the State. • Speed Up Traffic Relief and Mass Transit Projects Los Angeles has the most congested traffic in the country. San Francisco/Oakland is second, San Diego sixth, and Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino/Riverside follow close behind. Proposition 42 guarantees that gasoline sales taxes — taxes the City already pays — will be used for transportation improvements. It will help speed up the delivery of planned traffic relief projects on the highways and local roads, and expand local bus and commuter services, such as Valley Transportation Authorities (VTA) in San Jose, Sacramento Light Rail, San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI), Green and Blue Lines in Los Angeles, the San Diego Trolley, 'BART, Caltrans, Capitol Corridor, Southern California's Metrolink, ACE, and the Coaster in San Diego. • Create Jobs and Stimulate the Economy Speeding up transportation projects has the added benefit of creating thousands of new jobs in construction, engineering, and related services — especially during these critical times. Every dollar spent on highway improvements generates about six times that amount in economic benefits. .ALTERNATIVES: The City may choose not to take a position or to oppose Proposition 42. FISCAL IMPACT: Under Proposition 42, cities will continue to collect their share of sales tax generated "at the pump" as a General Fund Revenue. The State's share - of these funds would be deposited into a Transportation Investment Fund beginning in 2003-2004. For the first five years (through 2007- 2008), the money could only be spent on State transportation projects. Starting .in 2008-2009, twenty percent of these funds would be allocated to California cities for their transportation projects: The City allocation would be based on population. Staff estimates that West Covina would receive an additional $300,000.to $400,000 per year. XAAGENDA - 2002\Adoption of Resolution Supporting Prop. 42.doc r Andrew G. Pasmant, City Manager and City Council Page 3 — Februml 5, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution. RESOLUTION NOA0—?-9 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL .OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE COALITION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA :CITIES AND SUPPORTING YES ON PROPOSITION 42 — THE TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT, ON THE MARCH 5, 2002 STATEWIDE BALLOT Prepared by: c 1 Nar . Palkhiwala Acting City Engineer Reviewed and approved by: Reviewed and approve by: Shannon A. auchzee Artie ds Acting Public Works Director Acting Finance Director SAY:njp Attachments — Resolution List of Supporters XAAGENDA - 2002\Adoption of Resolution Supporting Prop. 42.doc • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE COALITION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES AND SUPPORTING YES ON PROPOSITION 42 — THE TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT, ON THE.MARCH 5, 2002 STATEWIDE BALLOT. WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help make city roads safer and reduce traffic without higher taxes by requiring the gasoline sales taxes the City already pays to be used to improve mass transit, highways, and local roads; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 is based on the principle that taxes paid at the gas pump should be used for transportation purposes; and WHEREAS, traffic is paralyzing travel with Los Angeles now ranked the number one most congested urban area .in the county, San Francisco/Oakland second, San Diego sixth and Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino/Riverside following close behind; and WHEREAS, with our neglected transportation system needing attention, California has the third worst deteriorated roads in the nation and more than 6,000 of our bridges and overpasses are structurally deficient or no longer meet highway safety or design standards; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will provide a stable and ongoing source of transportation funding that will make it possible to plan for our future transportation needs; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will guarantee funds to every city and county to help fix potholes, repair dangerous road conditions, and improve the safety of children walking or biking to school; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help speed up highway safety and traffic relief projects, and expand and improve mass transit systems; and WHEREAS, all Proposition 42 projects will be subject to an annual audit and standard accounting practices to ensure they are delivered on time and on budget; and WHEREAS, by speeding up transportation projects thousands of new construction jobs and other jobs will be created, our economy will be stimulated and every dollar in our highways will result in almost six times that in economic benefits. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City, of West Covina supports the passage of Proposition 42 on the March 5, 2002 statewide ballot and supports the efforts of the League of California Cities and the Coalition for "Yes" on Proposition 42. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption hereof PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council this day of 2002. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, at their regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day.of February 2002, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney