Loading...
01-19-2010 - Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance Approving Zone Change #09-01, Applicant: Tom Corley, Pacific Development, Location: 1838 E. Workman AvenueTO: Andrew G. Pasmant, City Manager and City Council City of West Covina Memorandum AGENDA ITEM NO. D- 3a DATE: January 19, 2010 FROM: Susan Rush Assistant City Clerk SUBJECT: ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 APPLICANT: TOM CORLEY, PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: 1838 E. WORKMAN AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. / - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST. COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 DISCUSSION: This ordinance was introduced at the City Council meeting of December •-15, 2009. The ordinance will change the zoning on a 1.10-acre property to allow the construction of a senior apartment housing development. The ordinance will become effective 30 days after adoption on February 18, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact with the adoption of an ordinance except for minor costs associated with updating the municipal code books. Prepared b argaret Garcia Deputy City Clerk Approved by Susan Rush Assistant City Clerk Attachment: 1. Ordinance 2. December 15, 2009 Staff Report Item #F-3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 WHEREAS, there was filed with this Commission a verified application on the forms prescribed in Section 26-153 and 26-199 of the West Covina Municipal Code, for the reclassification from: "Specific Plan No. 22" to "MF-20" (Multi -Family Residential) on that certain property generally described as follows: Assessor's Parcel Number 8454-018-031, in the records of the Los Angeles County Assessor; and WHEREAS, the proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan Designation of "High Density Residential"; and WHEREAS, said zone change has also been requested to facilitate the construction of a 65- unit senior citizen affordable apartment complex; and WHEREAS, consistent with this request the applicant has requested a conditional use permit for incentives for the provision of senior citizen and affordable housing, including the granting of a density bonus for an increase in density from 20 units per acre allowed under the "MF- 20" Zone to 59.1 units per acre, and the approval of certain deviations from the development standards of the "MF-20" Zone, including deviations from lot width, density, parking standards, setbacks, ground coverage, building length, unit size, recreation/leisure space, and private storage areas; and WHEREAS, consistent with this request a precise plan has been submitted to allow for the development of a three-story apartment building with associated parking facilities; and WHEREAS, it is a stated goal of the Housing Element of the General Plan to provide all residents of West Covina with opportunities to live in decent, safe, sanitary, and energy -efficient housing at costs they can reasonably afford; and WHEREAS, it is a stated goal of the Housing Element of the General Plan to encourage the construction of a wide variety of new housing to meet the needs of all residents; and WHEREAS, the proposed senior citizen apartment use of the property will be compatible with existing surrounding uses, which include multiple -family residential, single-family residential, commercial, and institutional uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving the required notice, did on the 10d' day of November, 2009, conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving the required notice, did on the IOth day of November, 2009, conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the subject application for a Zone Change, at which time the Planning Commission adopted resolution 09-5343 recommending approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council did, on the 15t' day of December, 2009, conduct a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law, and considered evidence presented by the Planning Commission, Planning Department, and other interested parties. WHEREAS; studies and investigations made by the City Council and in its behalf reveal the following facts: L. Approval of the zone change will allow, for the development of the site that consists of partially -constructed improvements which. fronts on Workman Avenue and is adjacent to existing multi -family housing and an automobile dealership. 2. Findings necessary for approval of zone change are as follows: a. There are changed conditions since the existing zoning became effective to warrant other or additional zoning. b. The proposed change of zone will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value or precedent and will not be detrimental to the area. Ordinance No. Zone Change No. 09-01 December 15, 2009 - Page 2 C. A change of zone will be in the interest or furtherance of the public health, safety, and general welfare. ' d. The approval of such a change of zone will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan so adopted by the City. e. The approval of such a zone change is consistent with the General Plan or applicable specific plans. 3. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. (CEQA) of 1970, a MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT has been prepared indicating that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect due to mitigating measures: WHEREAS, based on the evidence, both oral and documentary, the City Council finds. as follows: a. The site is currently zoned "Specific Plan No. 22. The specific plan allows for the development of a 24-unit condominium development: Surrounding land uses include a two-story apartment complex to the north, across Workman Avenue, and a school to the I northeast. A Chrysler -Jeep automobile dealership is located immediately to the west and south. An existing senior housing.project is located to the east of the subject property. The properties to the north and east are zoned "Medium Density Residential " (MF-20). The property adjacent to the west and to the south is zoned "S-C" (Service Commercial). The proposed zoning is compatible with the surrounding zones and land use. b. The proposed change of zone will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value or precedent and will not be detrimental to the surrounding area. Surrounding land uses include apartment buildings, a senior, citizen development, and automobile. sales, service and storage. The proposed senior citizen apartment complex, submitted concurrently with the proposed change of zone, has been designed so as to not disrupt the use of adjoining propertyand to be aesthetically compatible with the area. Vehicular and pedestrian access is gained from Workman Avenue, immediately to the north of the site. The driveway approach to the site will not interfere with the surrounding properties. The project will be surrounded by a six- foot high block wall, which will serve as a buffer between the site, including the parking area, and the surrounding properties. The parking area is located along .the east side of the site, between the proposed three-story building and the existing three-story senior apartments to the east of the site. Landscaping is proposed along the perimeter of the property. Trees will be planted in this landscaped area and will, upon maturity, serve as a visual buffer between the site and the adjoining, residential properties. Landscaped yards, which will further screen the site from the surrounding properties, are proposed along the south, west, and north boundaries. C. The zone change will facilitate the development of 65 housing units for low and very low-income senior citizens. This housing will provide a significant benefit to the community in terms of providing sound, quality affordable housing for a variety of household types. d. The proposed change of zone will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. The proposed affordable housing project will serve to further the achievement of goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan to provide all residents of West Covina with opportunities to live in decent, safe, and affordable housing, to assist in meeting existing and projected needs for lower -income housing, and to facilitate the development of housing for the elderly. C. The proposed zone change from "Specific Plan No. 22" to "MF-20" ("Multiple - Family Residential - 20 dwelling units per acre") is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site "High Density Residential" (Over 20.0 dwelling s • Ordinance NO. . Zone Change No. 09-01 December 15, 2009 - Page 3 units per acre), with a senior citizen density bonus allowing a density of 59.1 units per acre. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION NO. 1: Based on the evidence presented, and the findings set forth, the above Zone Change No. 09-01 is hereby found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the land uses permitted within said zone classification. SECTION NO.2: Pursuant to Section 15304 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program for this project by the City Council. SECTION NO.3: The Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that they approve Zone Change No. 09-01 (Exhibit "A"). APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this _ day of , Mayor Shelly Sanderson ATTEST: City Clerk Laurie Carrico I, LAURIE CARRICO, CITY CLERK of the City of West Covina, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of That thereafter said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Laurie Carrico APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Arnold Alvarez-Glasman ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 EXHIBIT A Indicates area proposed to be rezoned from "Specific Plan No. 22" to "Medium Density Multiple Family Residential' (MF-20) fCf West Covina 1e;Orandum AGENDA TO: City Manager and City Council ITEM NO. F 3 FROM: Jeff Anderson DATE: December 15, 2009 Acting City Planner SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPLICANT: Tom Corley, Pacific Development LOCATION: 1838 E. Workman Avenue RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council adopt the following resolution: 1) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. FOR ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.09-04, AND PRECISE PLAN NO. 09-03, PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED The Planning Commission and staff further recommend that the. City Council introduce the following ordinance: 2) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 09-01 DISCUSSION: The request is to change the zoning on a 1.10-acre property to allow the construction of a senior, apartment housing development located at 1838 E. Workman Avenue. The site was previously approved for a 24-unit condominium development. Building permits were issued and. construction began on the project that was stopped at the.first-story framing. On November 10, 2009, the Planning Commission approved a precise plan and conditional use permit for the development of the senior housing complex and recommended approval of the zone change. For more detailed information on the precise plan and conditional use permit, please refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 5). Proposed Development The proposal is to allow the construction of a three-story, 65-unit senior citizen apartment complex. The subject property is adjacent to an existing senior housing development on the east and an automobile dealership on the west and south. The three-story structure is proposed on the westerly portion of the property. The building is a long, linear building that includes a 20-foot by 20-foot "notch" to allow for Fire Department trucks to turn -around per Fire Code standards. The Fire Prevention Bureau of the West Covina Fire Department has. reviewed the plans and found that the plans comply with the 2007 California Fire Code and the 2006 International Fire Code. A memorandum from the Fire Department is attached (Attachment 7). The trash enclosure is provided at the rear of the building with a trash chute provided at each floor. Security gates are proposed at the front of the property for pedestrians and vehicles. The project includes 68 parking spaces on the easterly portion of the property. The four parking spaces closest to Workman Avenue would be located on the outside of the security gates and would function as guest parking. ZACase Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E Workman\CC\Council Staff Report.doc ZC 07-03 1838 E. Workman Avenue December 15, 2009 - Page 2 The subject property has been previously graded as part of the construction of the 24-unit condominium project. Retaining walls have been constructed along the rear and side property lines. All other improvements on the property will be demolished prior to the construction of the senior apartment complex. The architecture of the senior citizen apartments is similar to the neighboring West Covina Senior Villas project. The project has'' been designed with stone veneer on the front elevation, and at the center of the side elevation. Protruding balconies on the east and west elevations and gable roofs with knee braces are incorporated into the design. The 65 units are one -bedroom apartments. One of the units is reserved for the manager. The project would provide 13 very low-income and 51 low-income units. An 816-square foot Community Room and a 400-square foot patio are proposed on the third floor of the building for recreational space. A laundry room is provided on the second floor of the building. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding this matter on November 10, 2009. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission voted 5-0 to approve the precise plan and conditional use permit and recommend approval of ;the zone change to the City Council. The project required the approval of a precise plan for site plan layout and for the building architecture. Furthermore, the project required the approval of a conditional use permit for a density bonus and development standard incentives to encourage the development of affordable senior housing project. The Planning Commission discussed the proposed density bonus, design, and site layout of the project as well as safety concerns with the above ground power lines. The Commissioner's noted that the proposed site was an ideal location for a senior housing development in that there are commercial uses within walking distance. Additionally, the Planning Commission noted that the project complies with the factors for consideration of the conditional use permit to allow the density bonus and development standards incentives. The Commission consensus was that the project was good for the City and senior citizens'' as it provides needed low and moderate -income senior housing. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the project would not have any impact on the City's General Fund. Aeview'ekAppro�ec�jPrep y: Jeff Anderson Christopher J. Chung Acting City Planner CDC Director Attachments: Attachment 1 — Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact Resolution Attachment 2 — Draft Zone Change Ordinance for Approval Attachment 3 — Planning Commission Resolution No. 09-5342, Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachment 4 - Planning Commission Resolution No. 08-5343, Zone Change No. 09-01 Attachment 5 - Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 10, 2009 Attachment 6 — Planning Commission Minutes dated November 10, 2009 Attachment 7 — Fire Department Memorandum, Dated November 9, 2009 Z:\Case Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E Workman\CC\Council Staff Report.doc ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ZONE CHANGE NO. 09-01, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 09-04, AND PRECISE PLAN NO. 09-03, PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPLICANT: Tom Corley, Pacific Development LOCATION: 1838 E. Workman Avenue WHEREAS, there was filed with this . City verified applications on forms prescribed in Chapter 26, Article VI of the West Covina Municipal Code requesting the approval of a General Plan amendment, zone change, conditional use permit, and precise' plans to facilitate the construction of a three-story, 65-unit senior citizen apartment complex on that certain properties generally described as: Assessor's Parcel No. 8454-018-031, as shown on the latest rolls of the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, an initial study was prepared for said project; and WHEREAS, based upon the findings of the initial study, it was determined that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment and will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the California Fish and Game Code; and . WHEREAS,. a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared for the proposed project pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and mitigation measures are included in said Negative Declaration in support of the finding that there will not be a significant effect on the environment as a result of this project. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving the required notice, did on the 10t` day of November, 2009, conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the subject application for a Zone Change, at which time the Planning Commission adopted resolution 09-5342 recommending approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council did, on the 15th day of December, 2009, conduct a duly advertised public: hearing as prescribed by law to consider said environmental documents, and considered evidence presented by the Planning Commission, Planning Department and other interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of West Covina does hereby resolve as follows: 1. After receiving and considering. all determinations, studies, documents, and recommendations, as well as other appropriate public comments, the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina hereby recommends to the City Council certification of the .Negative Declaration of Environmental. Impact, subject to compliance with the mitigation measures that are recommended in the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact as outlined below: ZACase Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E Workman\CC\CC Neg Dec Reso.doc Resolution No. • Negative Declaration for ZC 09-01, CUP 09704, PP 09-03 December 15, 2009 — Page 2 Environmental Impacts Mitigation Measures Monitoring Dept./ ency Monitoring Methods Aesthetics A lighting plan check will be required Planning Lighting Plan including review of a photometric plan to Department Review, Site. ensure that new lighting will not "spill Building Inspections over" onto adjacent properties. Division Air Quality The construction area and all accessible Building Grading plan. areas (public streets, sidewalks, etc.) Department, check, Site within 100 feet of the project site . shall be Planning inspections,. swept (preferably with water sweepers) Department Landscaping and watered at least three times daily. plan review All unpaved roads, parking, and staging areas shall be watered at least twice times daily using SCAQMD Rule 1186 certified water sweepers or ' recommended water sweepers using reclaimed water. Water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all - areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the project site. At a minimum, this measure would include wetting down such areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. On -site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or rusty materials shall be covered or watered at least twice daily. All. haul trucks exporting soil from the project site shalleither be covered or sprinkled with water prior to entering public streets. All inactive disturbed surface. areas shall be watered on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind -driven fugitive dust. During Santa Ana wind conditions with wind speeds exceeding 15 miles per hour, soil disturbance areas shall be watered hourly or active operations on unpaved surfaces shall be terminated until wind speeds no longer exceed 15 miles per hour. Graded surfaces shall be vegetated as soon as possible after the completion of grading within the construction area. Z:\Case Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E Workman\CC\CC Neg Dec Reso:doc Resolution No. Negative Declaration for ZC 09-01, CUP 09-04, PP 09-03 December 15, 2009 — Page 3 Landscaping shall be installed on all graded surfaces proposed, for landscaping as soon as possible after the completion of grading operations. Traffic speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour. or less. Cultural If evidence of archeological or Planning Cultural Resources paleontological resources is encountered Department Resources on -site, the applicant and the developer shall notify the Planning Department and construction activity shall cease until a qualified specialist, as determined by the West Covina Planning Department, has been retained to assess the findings and initiate a recovery program. In the event that human remains are found during construction activities, the applicant and the developer shall notify the Planning Department and construction activity shall cease until a qualified specialist, as determined by the West Covina Planning Department, has been retained to assess the findings and initiate a recoveryprogram. Hazards and Removal of any hazardous substances on Engineering Site plan check, Hazardous the project site would comply with the Department, Grading plan Materials Sate and West Covina Public Works Building check, Department requirements. Department, Construction Fire Department permit, Approval of Closure report by the Fire Department Hydrology and Drainage improvements shall conform to Engineering Site plan check, Water Quality the requirements of the Los Angeles Department, Grading plan County Flood Control District and be Building . check, reviewed and approved prior to issuance Department, Construction of grading permits. Additionally, the State Regional permit developer shall obtain a construction Water Quality permit from the State Regional Water Control Board Quality Control Board for construction period stormwater discharges. The developer shall comply with the SUSMP. Additionally, the developer shall incorporate best management practices, as mentioned earlier in this Initial Study to prevent erosion. Noise Construction contracts shall specify that Fire Department, Site plan check, all construction equipment shall be Public Works Grading plan equipped with mufflers and other suitable Department check, noise attenuation devices. Construction permit Transportation The proposed project would be required to Engineering Construction comply with the City of West Covina Department, permit, Site Public Works Department to reduce the Building Inspection impacts to traffic and parking during Department, construction. Fire Department Z:\Case Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E Workman\CC\CC Neg Dec Reso.doc Resolution No.. Negative Declaration for ZC 09-01, CUP 09-04, PP 09-03 December 15, 2009 — Page 4 2. Non-compliance with the aforementioned mitigation measures as by the monitoring department/agency and any measures taken to correct said non-compliance shall be immediately reported to the Planning Department on the City of West Covina Monitoring Checklist Form. 3. The applicant agrees to implement the aforementioned mitigation measures and monitoring or reporting requirements. 4. Failure to comply with any aforementioned mitigation measures and/or monitoring or reporting requirements will result in a written notice of violation from the City to the applicant at which time the City may order that all or a portion of pre - construction, construction, post -construction activity or project implementation must cease until compliance is reached. 5. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and State and local guidelines, rules, regulations, and procedures adopted pursuant thereto permits the City of West Covina to impose any fees or charges associated with implementing the above monitoring program upon the applicant. 6. The City Clerk shall certify as to the passage of this Resolution. m PASSED AND APPROVED on this 15 day of December, 2009. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF WEST COVINA ) I, Laurie Carrico, City Clerk of the City of West Covina, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15'' day of December, 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DATE: December 15, 2009 ZACase Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E Workman\CC\CC Neg Dec Reso.doc � ATTACHMENTZ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 . WHEREAS, there was filed with this Commission a verified application on the forms prescribed in Section 26-153 and 26-199 of the West Covina Municipal Code, for the reclassification from: "Specific Plan No. 22" to "ME-20" (Multi -Family Residential) on that certain property generally described as follows: Assessor's Parcel Number 8454-018-031, in the records of the Los Angeles County Assessor; and WHEREAS, the proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan Designation of "High Density Residential"; and WHEREAS, said zone change has also been requested to facilitate the construction of a 65- unit senior citizen affordable apartment complex; and WHEREAS, consistent with this request the applicant has requested a conditional use permit for incentives for the provision of senior citizen and affordable housing, including the granting of a density bonus for an increase in density from 20 units per acre allowed under the "MF- 20" Zone to 59.1 units per acre, and the approval of certain deviations from the development . standards of the "MF-20" Zone, including deviations from lot width, density, parking standards; setbacks, ground coverage, building length, unit size, recreation/leisure space, and private storage areas; and WHEREAS, consistent with this request a precise plan has been submitted to allow for the development of a three-story apartment building with associated parking facilities; and WHEREAS, it is a stated goal of the Housing Element of the General Plan to provide all residents of West Covina with opportunities to live in decent, safe, sanitary, and energy -efficient housing at costs they can reasonably afford; and WHEREAS, it is a stated goal of the Housing Element of the General Plan to encourage the construction of a wide variety of new housing to meet the needs of all residents; and WHEREAS; the proposed senior citizen apartment use of the property will be compatible with existing surrounding uses, which include multiple -family residential, single-family residential, commercial, and institutional uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving the required notice, did on the 10t' day of November, 2009, conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application; and . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving the required notice, did on the 1011' day of November, 2009, conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the subject application for a Zone Change, at which time the -Planning Commission adopted resolution 09-5343 recommending approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council did, on the 15t' day of December, .2009, conduct a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law, and considered evidence presented by the Planning Commission, Planning Department, and other interested parties. WHEREAS, studies and investigations made by the City Council and in its behalf reveal the following facts: ZACase Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E Worlanan\CC\Council ZC Ord.doc Ordinance No. Zone Change No. 09-01 December 15, 2009 - Page 2 1. Approval of the zone change will allow for the development of the site that consists of partially -constructed improvements which fronts on Workman Avenue and is adjacent to existing multi -family housing and an automobile dealership. 2. Findings necessary for approval of zone change are as follows: a. There are changed conditions since the existing zoning became effective to warrant other or additional zoning. b. The proposed change of zone will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value or precedent and will not be detrimental to the area. C. A change of zone: will be in the interest or furtherance of the public health, safety, and general welfare. d. The approval of such a change of zone will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan so adopted by the City. e. The approval of such a zone change is consistent with the General Plan or applicable specific plans. 3. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, a MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RvIPACT has been prepared indicating that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect due to mitigating measures. WHEREAS, based on the evidence, both oral and documentary, the City Council finds as follows: a. The site is currently zoned "Specific Plan No. 22." The specific plan allows for the development of a 24-unit condominium development. Surrounding land uses include a two-story apartment complex to the north, across Workman Avenue, and a school to the northeast. A Chrysler -Jeep automobile dealership is located immediately to the. west and south. An existing senior housing project is located to the east of the subject property. The properties to the north and east are zoned "Medium Density Residential " (1VTF'-20). The property adjacent to the west and to 11 the south, is zoned "S-C" (Service Commercial). The proposed zoning is compatible with the surrounding zones and land use. b. The proposed change of zone will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value or precedent and will not be detrimental to the surrounding area. Surrounding land uses include apartment buildings, a senior citizen development, and automobile sales, service and storage. The proposed senior citizen apartment complex, submitted concurrently with the proposed change of zone, has been designed so as. to not disrupt the use of adjoining property and to be aesthetically compatible with the area. Vehicular and pedestrian access is gained from Workman Avenue, immediately to the north of the site. The driveway approach to the site will not interfere with the surrounding properties. The project will be surrounded by a six- foot high block wall, which will serve as a buffer between the site, including the parking. area, and the surrounding properties,. The parking area is located along the east side of the site, between the proposed three-story building and the existing three-story senior apartments to the east of the site. Landscaping is proposed along the perimeter of the property. Trees will be planted in this landscaped area and will, upon maturity, serve as a visual buffer between the site and the adjoining residential properties. Landscaped yards, which will further screen the site from the surrounding properties, are. proposed along the south, west, and north boundaries. C. The zone change will facilitate the development of 65 housing units for low- and very low-income senior citizens. This housing will provide a significant benefit to ZACase Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E Worlmian\CC\Council ZC Ord.doc Ordinance No. + • Zone Change. No. 09-01 December 15, 2009 - Page 3 the community in terms of providing sound, quality affordable housing for a variety of household types. d. The proposed change of zone will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. The proposed affordable housing project will,serve to further the achievement of goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan to provide all residents of West Covina with opportunities to live in decent, safe, and affordable housing, to assist in meeting existing and projected needs for lower -income housing, and to facilitate the development of housing for the elderly. e. The proposed zone change from "Specific Plan No. 22" to "MF-20" ("Multiple - Family Residential - 20 dwelling units per acre") is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site "High Density Residential" (Over 20.0 dwelling units per acre), with a senior citizen density bonus allowing a density of 59.1 units per acre. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION NO. 1: Based on the evidence presented, and the findings set forth, the above Zone Change No. 09-01 is hereby found to be consistent with the .City's General Plan and the land uses permitted within said zone classification. SECTION NO. 2: Pursuant to Section 15304 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program for this project by the City Council. SECTION NO. 3: The Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that it approval of Zone Change No. 09-01 (Exhibit "A"). ZACase Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E Worlmian\CC\Council ZC Ord.doc Ordinance No. • Zone Change No. 09-01 December 15, 2009 - Page 4 PASSED AND APPROVED on this 15'' day of December 2009. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF WEST COVINA ) I, Laurie Carrico, City Clerk of the City of West Covina, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a. regular meeting of the City Council on the 15'h day of December 2009. That, thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2010. F. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DATE: December 15, 2009 City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Z:\Case Files\ZONE CHANGE\2009\09-01 1838 E. Workman\CC\Council ZC Ord.doc ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 EXHIBIT A � y h rt 4 ti t 1n x t z 2 yr is fte ! e j h�My a i 2> tt,°r {� .rirt3; a a ! a s a t � E Workman Ave t a a h axyw i k t" k rt t#. ,t t� q° �y + w ,•�+,�'� €. a �'){7 e ���5a��iX,+ f t�F� s(s, trit'�2 �� 10 '� � f � t H i � � iw.3 ^,, :Z +y^. ;• "7 D �atx �yarf>�t x xttiv2 t� r t n a s „ a fD ? ti �35 v as to x i r ax P i$3$ ' ' 1$4c m s Y r ^: 4`s J ti .h� ipi 0,;�+:)t . L; t tiu eat `°•�'a t, *rStnd 5iay.;t 6 r; r y xaN "t r d k m 3f�1t aS p' S r.t r + aka q t 5x ♦t I �� a a A -3 s,� S °. E SIf3R7WOOd $i 'yt ` _ vt ts. '.-���ta Y �r a✓rt S. 3i! �p'19t:, +� ,�Yyw s. to yr y 4 r �. Qda� T4 ive x i r t 19d� 1O 191t w t � a �zaw mar a . Indicates area proposed to be rezoned from "Specific Plan No. 22" to "Medium Density Multiple. Family Residential" (MF-20) RESOLUTION NO. 09-5342 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ZONE CHANGE NO. 09-01, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 09-04, AND PRECISE PLAN NO. 09-03, PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPLICANT: Tom Corley, Pacific Development LOCATION: 1838 E. Workman Avenue . WHEREAS, there was 'filed with this City verified applications on forms prescribed in Chapter 26, Article' VI of the West Covina Municipal Code requesting the approval of a precise plan and conditional use permit to facilitate: the construction of a three-story, 65-unit senior citizen apartment complex on that certain property generally described as: Assessor's Parcel Nos. Assessor Parcel Nos.. 8454-018-031, as shown on the latest rolls of the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission upon giving the required notice did on the 10'h day of November, 2009, conduct duly advertised public hearings as prescribed by law to consider said application; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, an initial study was prepared for said project; and WHEREAS, based upon the fmdings of the initial study, it was determined that the proposed project will not have Ga significant impact on the environment and will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the California Fish and Game Code; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared for the proposed project pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and mitigation measures are included in said Negative Declaration'in support of the finding that there will not be a significant effect on the environment as a result of this project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina does hereby resolve as follows: 1. After receiving and considering all determinations, studies, documents, and recommendations, as well as other appropriate public comments, the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina hereby recommends to the City Council certification of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, subject to compliance with the mitigation measures that are recommended in the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact as outlined below: ZAResos\2009\09-5342 Negative Declacation.doc Planning Commission Rotion No. 09-5342 Mitigated Negative Declaration for ZC 09-01, CUP 09-04 & PP 09-03 November 10, 2009 — Page 2 Environmental Mitigation Measures Monitoring Monitoring Impacts Dept./Agency Methods Aesthetics A lighting plan, including a photometric Planning Pre- plan, shall be submitted to the Building construction Department for review and approval to plan check ensure that new lighting will not "spill over" onto adjacent residential properties. On -site construction inspection Air Quality During construction, the project contractor Building/ Pre - shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 Engineering construction (Fugitive Dust). plan check South Coast Air Quality On -site Management construction District inspections Cultural If archaeological resources are uncovered Planning On -site Resources on the project site during grading,. the Department, construction developer must notify the West Covina Building inspection Planning Department immediately and Division work must stop within a 100-foot radius until a qualified archeologist, to be approved by the City, has evaluated the find. Construction activity may continue unimpeded on other portions of the project site. If the find is determined by the qualified archeologist to be a unique archeological resource, as defined by Section 2103.2 of the Public Resources Code, the site shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Section 21083.2 of the Public Resources Code. If the find is determined not to be a unique archeological resource, no further action is necessary and construction may continue. If paleontological resources are uncovered during excavation of the project site, the City of West Covina Planning Department shall be notified immediately and work must stop within 100 feet of the find to allow a qualified paleontologist to appropriately remove the find. MM-CR-3 If during excavation of the project site human remains are discovered, the steps described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) shall be followed. (1) There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until: ZAResos\2009\09-5342 Negative Dectaration.doc Planning Commission Fc..Ition No. 09-5342 Mitigated Negative Declaration for ZC 09-01, CUP 09-04 & PP 09-03 November 10, 2009 — Page 3 (A) The coroner of the County in which the remains are discovered must be contacted to determine that no investigation of the cause of death is required, and (B) If, the coroner determines the remains to be Native American: 1. The coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours. 2. The Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to' be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. 3. The most likely descendent may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, or (2) Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or his authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated' grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance. (A) The Native American . Heritage. Commission is unable to identify a most likely descendent or the most likely descendent failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified by the commission. (8)The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation; or (C) The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and the mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. Geology and I.The project shall be designed and I Building/ Pre- ZAResos\2009\09-5342 Negative Declaration.doc Planning Commission RIWtion No. 09-5342 Mitigated Negative Declaration for ZC 09-01, CUP 09-04 & PP 09-03 November 10, 2009 — Page 4 Soils constructed in accordance with . the Engineering construction requirements of Chapter 16 .(Structural plan check Design). of the 2007 California Building Code (CBC), the West Covina Municipal On -site Code, and accepted engineering practices. construction inspection Prior to start of soil -disturbing activities at the site, the project applicant shall obtain a General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity to comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), to control erosion and pollution during construction of the project. The project applicant shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be administered throughout project construction. The SWPPP ' must list Best Management Practice (BMP) features that the discharger (project applicant) will use to protect storm water runoff. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City of West Covina Department of Public Works . shall approve the SWPPP. The project applicant shall prepare and implement a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) in accordance with the requirements of the West Covina Municipal Code to ensure that storm water runoff is managed for water quality concerns through implementation of appropriate and applicable best management practices (BMPs). Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City of West Covina Department of Public Works shall approve the SUSMP. Hydrology and Prior to start of soil -disturbing activities at Building/ On -site Water Quality the site, the project applicant shall obtain Engineering . construction a General Permit for Discharges of Storm inspection Water Associated with Construction Activity to comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), to control erosion and pollution during construction of the project. The project applicant shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be administered throughout project construction. The SWPPP must list Best Management Practice (BMP) features that the discharger (project applicant) will use to protect storm water runoff. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City of West Covina Department of Public Works shall approve the SWPPP. Z:\Resos\2009\09-5342 Negative Declaration.doc . Planning Commission K. Won No. 09-5342 • Mitigated Negative Declaration for ZC 09-01, CUP 09-04 & PP 09-03 November 10, 2009 - Page.5 The project applicant shall prepare and implement a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) in accordance with the requirements of the West Covina Municipal Code to ensure that storm water runoff is managed for water quality concerns through implementation of appropriate and applicable best management practices (BMPs).. Prior to issuance of any, grading or building permits, the City of West Covina Department of Public Works shall approve the SUSMP. Noise Construction activities, including delivery Building/ Pre - and haul routes, shall be restricted to Engineering construction hours between 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM plan check Within the radius of 500 feet of generally occupied residences. Field Observation Noise -generating equipment operated at after the project site shall be equipped with the Construction most effective noise control devices, i.e., mufflers, lagging, and/or motor enclosures. All equipment shall be properly maintained to assure that no additional noise, due to wom or improperly maintained parts, would be generated. To the extent feasible, construction activities shall be scheduled so as to avoid operating several pieces of heavy equipment simultaneously, which causes high noise levels. The construction staging area shall be located as far as feasible from sensitive receptors. All construction equipment shall be stored on the project site during the construction phase to eliminate daily heavy-duty truck trips on vicinity roadways. Operation: Project. operation shall comply with the requirements of the Building Department and the 2007 California Building Code (CBC) regarding interior noise levels. Public Services The project applicant shall comply with Fire Department Pre - (Fire, Parks,. all applicable City codes and regulations construction Libraries) pertaining to fire protection as required by Building/ plan check the West Covina Fire Department. Engineering On -site The project applicant shall comply with construction Sections 2040, and 26-204 of the City of inspection West Covina Municipal Code, which ZAResos\2009\09-5342 Negative Declaration.doc Planning Commission lotion No. 09-5342 Mitigated Negative Declaration for ZC 09-01, CUP 09-04 & PP 09-03 November 10, 2009 — Page 6 requires the dedication of land or payment of in -lieu park fees by the developer of any multiple family residential. development within the City. The project applicant shall pay the County of Los Angeles Public Library mitigation impact fee in effect at the time building permits are issued for the project. 2. Non-compliance with the aforementioned mitigation measures as by the monitoring department/agency and any measures taken to correct said non-compliance shall be immediately reported to the Planning Department on the City of West Covina Monitoring Checklist Form. 3. The applicant agrees to implement the aforementioned mitigation measures and monitoring or reporting requirements. 4. Failure to comply with any aforementioned mitigation measures and/or monitoring or reporting requirements will result in a written notice of violation from the City to the applicant at, which time the City may order that all or a portion of pre - construction, construction, post -construction activity or project implementation must cease until compliance is reached. 5. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and State and local guidelines, rules, regulations, and procedures adopted pursuant thereto permits the City of West Covina to impose any fees or charges associated with implementing the above'monitoring program upon the applicant. I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Planning. Commission of the City of West Covina, at a regular meeting held on the 101h day. of November, 2009, by the following vote: AYES:' Redholtz, Sotelo, Carrico, Sykes, Stewart NOES: - None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DATE: November 10, 2009 Dave Stewart, Chairman Planning Commission Jeff erson, AICP, Secretary Planning Commission Z:\Resos\—?009\09-5342 Negative Declaration.doc ATTACHMENT 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 09-5343 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPLICANT: Tom Corley, Pacific Development, LOCATION: 1838 E. Workman Avenue WHEREAS, there was filed with this Commission a verified application on the forms prescribed in Section 26-1.53 and 26-199 of the West Covina Municipal Code, for the reclassification from: "Specific Plan No. 22" to "MF-20" (Multi -Family Residential) on that certain property generally described as follows: Assessor's Parcel Number 8454-018-031,. in the records of the Los Angeles County Assessor; and WHEREAS, said zone change will provide consistency between the General. Plan and Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, said zone change has also been requested to facilitate the construction of a 65- unit senior citizen affordable apartment complex; and WHEREAS, consistent with this request the applicant has requested a conditional use permit for incentives for the provision of senior citizen and affordable housing, including. the granting of a density bonus for an increase in density from 20 units per acre allowed under the "MF- 20" Zone to 59J units per acre, and the approval of certain deviations from the development standards of the "NU-20" Zone, including deviations from lot width, density, parking standards, setbacks, ground coverage, building length, unit size, recreation/leisure space, and private storage areas; and WHEREAS, consistent with this request a precise plan has been submitted to .allow for the development of a three-story apartment building with associated parking facilities; and WHEREAS, it is a stated goal of the Housing Element of the General Plan to provide all residents of West Covina with opportunities to live in decent, safe, sanitary, and energy -efficient housing at costs they can reasonably afford; and WHEREAS, it is a stated goal of the Housing Element of the General Plan to'encourage the construction of a wide variety of new housing to meet the needs of all residents; and WHEREAS, the proposed senior citizen apartment use of the property will be compatible with existing surrounding uses, which include multiple -family residential, single-family residential, commercial, and institutional uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving the required notice, did on the 10t' day of November, 2009, conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application; and ZAResos\2009\09-5343 ZC 09-01 Sr.: Hsing-Worlonan.doc Planning Commission Resoluti*o. 09-5343 • Zone Change No. 09-01 November 10, 2009 - Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission and in its behalf reveal the following facts: 1. Approval of the zone change will allow for the development of the site that consists of partially -constructed improvements which fronts on Workman Avenue and is adjacent to existing multi -family housing and automobile dealership. 2. Findings necessary for approval of a zone change are as follows: a. There are changed conditions since the existing zoning became effective to warrant other or additional zoning. b. The proposed change of zone will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value or precedent and will not be detrimental to the area. C. A change of zone will be in the interest or furtherance of the public health, safety, and general welfare. d. The approval of such a change of zone will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan so adopted by the City. e. The approval of such a zone change is consistent with the General. Plan or applicable specific plans. 3. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, a MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT has been prepared indicating that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, .there will. not be a significant effect due to mitigating measures. WHEREAS, based on the evidence, both oral and documentary, the Planning Commission finds as follows: a. The site is currently zoned "Specific Plan No. 22." The specific plan allows for the development of a 24-unit condominium development. Surrounding land uses include a two-story apartment complex to the north, across Workman Avenue, and a school to the northeast. A Chrysler -Jeep automobile dealership is located immediately to the west and south. An existing senior housing project is located to the east of the subject property. The properties to the north and east are zoned "Medium Density Residential " (NE-20). The property adjacent to the west and to the south is zoned "S-C" (Service Commercial). The proposed zoning is compatible with the surrounding zones and land use. . b. The proposed change of zone will not adversely affect adjoining property as to value or precedent and will not be detrimental to the surrounding area. Surrounding land uses include apartment buildings, a senior citizen development, and automobile sales, service and storage.' The proposed. senior citizen apartment complex, submitted concurrently with the proposed change of zone, has been designed so as to not disrupt the use of adjoining property and to be aesthetically compatible with the area. Vehicular and pedestrian access is gained from Workman Avenue, immediately to the north of the site. The driveway approach to the site will not interfere with the surrounding properties. The project will be surrounded by a six- foot high block wall, which will serve as a buffer between the site, including the parking area, and the surrounding properties. The parking area is located along the east side of the site, between the proposed three-story building and the existing three-story senior apartments to the east of the site. Landscaping is proposed along the perimeter of the property. Trees will be planted in this landscaped area and will, upon maturity, serve as a visual buffer between the site and the adjoining residential properties. Landscaped yards, which will further screen the site from the surrounding properties, are proposed along the south, west, and north boundaries. Z:\Resos\2009\09-5343 ZC 09-01 Sr. Hsing-Worlanan.doc Planning Commission ResolutiP�o. 09-5343 •' Zone Change No. 09-01 November 10, 2009 - Page 3 of 4 C. The zone change will facilitate the development of 65 housing units for low- and very low-income senior citizens. This housing will provide a significant benefit to the community in terms of providing sound, quality affordable housing for a variety of household types. d. The proposed change of zone will not adversely. affect the comprehensive General Plan. The proposed affordable housing project will serve to further the achievement of goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan to provide all residents of West Covina with opportunities to live in decent, safe, and affordable housing, to assist in meeting existing and projected needs for lower -income housing, and to facilitate the development of housing for the elderly. e. The proposed zone change from "Specific Plan No..22" to "MF-20" ("Multiple - Family Residential - 20 dwelling units per acre") is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site "High Residential (Over 20.0 dwelling units per acre), with a senior citizen density bonus allowing a density of 59.1 units per acre. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina, California, does resolve as follows: SECTION NO. 1: Based on the evidence presented, and the findings set forth, the above Zone Change No. 09-01 is hereby found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the land uses permitted within said zone classification. SECTION NO. 2: A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared in accordance with the California.Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program for this project by the City Council. SECTION NO. 3: The Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that it approve Zone Change No. 09-01 (Exhibit 1) and thereby permit a change in the land use the proposed development of a three-story 65-unit senior citizen apartment complex. SECTION NO. 4: The Secretary is instructed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the City Council for its attention in the manner prescribed by law. I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina, at a regular meeting held on the 10t' day of November, 2009, by the following vote: AYES: Redholtz, Sotelo, Carrico, Sykes, Stewart NOES: None ABSENT: None DATE: November 10, 2009 Dave Stewart, Chairman Planning Commission Jeff rson, AICP, Secretary Planning Commission, Z:\Resos\2009\09-5343 ZC 09-01 Sr. Hsing-Worlanan.doc ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 EXHIBIT A Indicates area proposed to be rezoned from "Specific Plan No. 22" to "Medium Density Multiple Family Residential" (MF-20) ATTACHMENT 5 AGENDA ITEM NO. C-4 DATE: November 10, 2009 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.09-04 PRECISE PLAN NO.09-03 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPLICANT: Tom Corley, Pacific Development LOCATION: 1838 E. Workman Avenue I. DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION The project .consists of a request for a zone change application to change the designation from "Specific Plan No. 22" to "Multiple -Family Residential" (20 dwelling units per acre) (MF-20). A precise plan is proposed to construct a three- story senior citizen housing project. In addition, a conditional use permit is proposed to allow consideration of the proposal for affordable. senior housing. A 24-unit condominium .project has been previously approved at the site and construction had commenced. Due to economic conditions, that project was not completed. The site was formerly occupied by the American Red Cross. The project proposes the construction of a three-story, 65-unit senior apartment housing development on a 1.10-acre site. The proposed units are one bedroom and range in size from 630 square feet to 702 square feet. Additionally, the project includes 5,810 square feet of landscaping and 68 parking spaces. A code amendment (Code Amendment No. 09-03). to increase the discretionary density bonus allowed in the "Low- and Moderate -Income and Senior Citizen Housing" section of the code has been initiated. The proposed conditional use permit and precise plan are contingent on the approval of that code amendment. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION . Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt resolutions recommending to the City Council certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approval of Zone Change No. 09-01, and approval of Precise Plan No. 09-03, and Conditional Use Permit No. 09-04. III. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The initial study prepared and noticed for the project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines and disclosed that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project's design and as conditions of approval to reduce impacts on the- environment to a less than significant level. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality ZACase Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Workman\Staff report.doc ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 09� . 1838 E. Worlanan Avenue November 10, 2009 - Page 2 prepared for the project. These are appendices to the Initial Study, and while not attached, are available upon request. Traffic Study A traffic study (dated October 14, 2009) was prepared for the project -by Kimley- Horn and Associates. The traffic study analyzed the intersection of Azusa Avenue and Workman Avenue to determine if the proposed project would result in any potential significant traffic impacts. The study concludes that the project is not expected to result in a significant traffic impact at that intersection. Air Qualily According to the Air Quality Study prepared by Impact Sciences, the construction and operation emissions are below significant regional thresholds. The proposed construction activities would occur independently of the senior citizen housing operational activities. The project would not contribute substantially to regional or local air pollution problems in the area. The project will require demolition, grading and construction, which creates the potential for the generation of fugitive dusts (particulates), which may impact the surrounding properties. Mitigation measures are required to include wetting down soils, chemical stabilization of unattended construction areas, planting vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites, and physically covering all trucks hauling dirt, sand, or other loose materials to and from the site. VI. HISTORY The demolished American Red Cross structure was built on the property in 1948. It appears that they were originally constructed as residential buildings. Unclassified Use Permit No. 117 was approved by the Planning Commission in 1957. General Plan Amendment No. 05-01, Zone Change No. 05-02, Precise Plan No. 05- 01, Tentative Tract Map No. 62631, and Variance No. 05-01 were approved on appeal to the City Council on August 16, 2005.. That approval allowed for the construction of a 24-unit condominium .project. Building permits were issued for the project in March 2006. Construction began on the project and proceeded to the first -story framing. The construction will be removed prior to the construction of the senior apartment project. Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Workman\Staff report.doc ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 09V 1838 E. Worlanan Avenue November 10.2009 - Paee 3 V. SUMMARY OF DATA STANDARD PROPOSED PER REQUIRED/ALLOWED PRECISE PLAN PER ZONING CODE Site Area 1.10 acres 1 acre (47,793 sq. ft.) (43,560 sq. ft.) No. of Units 65 22.4* Density 59.1 du/ac 20 du/ac* Parking: 68 137* Ratio(Total Space/du) 1.05 2.1 * Covered 0 65 * Uncovered 68 72 * Guest 4 7* Setbacks Front (North) MF-20 15 feet 20 ft.* Side (East) R-1 68 feet 10 ft. Side (West) R-A 8 feet 10 ft.* Rear (South) S-C 5 feet 6 inches 20 ft.*, Building Height 44 feet 6 inches -- Building Length 331 ft. 200 ft.* Ground Coverage 41,983 sq. ft. 26,286 sq. ft.* (including paved areas) (88%) (55%) Unit Sizes: 630 sq. ft - 702 sq. ft._ 1,200 sq. ft.*. * Indicates standards from which developer is requesting approval for deviations. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: North: "Multiple -Family Residential" (20 Units per Acre) (MF-20); Apartment Complex South: "Service Commercial" (S-C); Automobile Dealership East: "Multiple -Family Residential" (20 Units per Acre) (MF-20); Senior Apartment Complex West: "Service Commercial" (S-C); Automobile Dealership General Plan Designation: "High Density Residential" '(Over 20 units per acre) Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838.E Worlanan\Staff report.doc ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 099 1838 E. Workman Avenue November 10, 2009 - Pale 4 Zoning: Existing: Proposed: "Specific Plan No. 22" "Multiple -Family Residential (20 dwelling units per acre) (MF-20) Notices of Public Hearing have been mailed to 187 owners and occupants of property within 300 feet of the project site. VI. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting the approval to construct a 65-unit affordable senior apartment project at 1838 E. Workman Avenue. The property is currently zoned "Specific Plan No. 22", which' allows for the development of a 24-unit condominium project. The applicant, is therefore requesting a zone change, precise plan, and conditional use permit to facilitate the development of the senior housing project. The existing construction on the property would be demolished. A General Plan amendment was approved in 2005 to allow the 24-unit condominium development. That General Plan amendment changed the land use, designation from "Suburban Residential" (2.1 to 4.0 units per acre) to "High Density Residential" (Over 20 units per acre). The proposed 65-unit senior housing proposal is consistent with the "High Density Residential" (Over 20 units per acre) land use designation. Therefore, no General Plan amendment is necessary. Zone Change The subject property is currently zoned "Specific Plan No. 22". A specific plan is often used by cities to plan for aparticular area or site at more detailed or precise level than provided by a zoning designation.. Specific Plan No. 22 was approved to allow 24 condominium units to be developed on the lot. The specific plan also specifies the size of the units, number of parking spaces, development standards, and includes an exhibit defming the elevations. The applicant is requesting a zone change to "Multiple -Family Residential" (20 dwelling units per acre) (MF-20) to allow for the development of the senior housing apartment complex. Properties located to the south and west are currently zoned "Service Commercial" (S-C), while the properties to the east and north are zoned "Medium Density Multiple - Family Residential". (MF-20). The "MF-20" Zone has a minimum lot size of one acre and a minimum lot width of 150 feet. The subject property is 1.10 acres; however, the lot width is 134 feet. Consequently, the applicant is requesting consideration on the required lot width through the conditional use permit. The "Low and Moderate Income and Senior. Citizen Housing" section of the Municipal Code allows a density bonus and zoning incentives for senior housing projects through the Conditional Use Permit process. More discussion on proposed deviations to development. standards will be provided in the conditional use permit section of this report. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting a density bonus and other incentives consistent with the "Low- and Moderate -Income and Senior Citizen Housing" (aka Density Bonus Ordinance) section of the Zoning Code.. The procedures were adopted in . accordance with state law requirements to encourage the development of affordable and/or senior housing projects. In order to encourage such projects, density bonus standards were written to allow for deviations from the standards of the code. Under normal circumstances, these deviations would require the approval of a variance. However, the section was written to allow these deviations, referred to as "incentives," for affordable and senior citizen projects through the approval of a conditional use permit. ZACase Fi1es\PP\2009\09-03 .Sr Hsing.1838 E Workman\Staff jeport.doc ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 090 1838 E. Workman Avenue November 10, 2009 - Page 5 Density Bonus The proposed project density is 59.1 units per acre. The increase in density equates to a density bonus of 200 percent above the otherwise allowable density of 20 units per acre that would be permitted under the proposed zoning of "MF-20." . There are two different types of density bonuses defined in the Municipal Code. A "mandatory" density bonus, which pursuant to State law, requires the City to grant a density bonus of at least 25 percent when a developer proposes to construct 10 percent of the units for very low-income households, 20 percent of the units for lower -income households, and/or 50 percent of the units for senior citizens. A "discretionary" density .bonus allows for a higher density bonus than required by State law to promote and facilitate affordable housing projects and increase the number of units that can be constructed.. A discretionary density bonus allows the City to grant higher density bonuses when greater amounts. of affordable or senior citizen housing are proposed. The project is requesting a discretionary density bonus. The ordinance does not provide a precise formula for determining discretionary density bonuses, but rather states that proposed requests are to be evaluated on a case -by -case basis, considering five factors. These factors are listed and discussed below: 1. The type and extent of target units being proposed. As stated, 100 percent of the project units (with the exception of the manager's unit) are proposed to be restricted to occupancy by senior citizen households (in which at least one resident is age 62 years or older). In addition, 20 percent of the units (13 units) are proposed to be restricted to occupancy by very low-income households at rent levels affordable to those households.. The remaining 80 percent of the units (51 units) are proposed to be restricted to occupancy by lower -income households at affordable rent levels. (The current income limit. for a two -person very low-income household in Los Angeles County is $31,706 per year, and the current limit for a two -person lower -income household is $50,750. per year.) In comparison to the requirements for a 25 percent mandatory density bonus, the developer is proposing affordable and senior citizen housing units in substantially higher proportions. In exchange for a 200 percent density bonus, the developer is providing 64 very -low and low-income senior citizen units. The applicant has indicated that monthly rents are expected to be $695 for the very -low income units and $795 for low-income units. As the proposed development is 100 percent senior. citizen housing and meets affordability requirements, the proposed density bonus of 200 percent would be consistent with this criteria. 2. That the density bonus is necessary to make the project economically feasible. The proposed project is a Community Development Commission -assisted project through the use of the Redevelopment Agency's affordable housing funds. To achieve the goals of providing affordable housing in the community, it is important to maximize the number of units for the site in order to make the project economically feasible to both the developer and the Agency. In order for an affordable housing project to be economically feasible, the developer must increase the number of units allowed by right by the zoning code or increase the amount of government assistance. Increasing the number of units makes the project cost effective and incomes from the added units creates a financially feasible project. The Community Development Commission is providing financial assistance in the amount of $8.6 million in the form of a loan. Based on the _ developer's proposal to develop 65 units of affordable senior housing and the Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Workman\Staff report.doc ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 09� 1838 E. Workman Avenue November 10, 2009 - Page 6 financial assistance provided, the cost per unit is approximately $132,308. While the proposed project is currently economically feasible, a reduction in the number of units below the 65 proposed would significantly change the land cost per unit and substantially affect the project's economic feasibility. 3. That the proposed housing will help fulfill the housing needs of the community as established within the Housing Element of the General Plan. The Housing Element of the General Plan has goals of providing all residents of West Covina with opportunities to live in decent, safe, sanitary, and energy - efficient housing at costs they can reasonably afford, and of encouraging the construction of a wide varietyy of new housing to meet the needs of all residents. The proposed project will contribute to the implementation of these goals. The General Plan Housing Unit Update, currently being prepared, will establish goals for providing new housing between 2008 and 2014 within various income categories. Current Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goals are 752 very low-income units and 3881ow-income units by 2014. The proposal to provide 13 very low-income and 51 low-income units would count toward the City's assigned very low-income and low-income housing units. As such, the proposed housing development would represent a contribution to the State -mandated housing goals. 4. That the housing development reflects high standards - in the quality of design and provision of amenities. The design and the architecture of the proposed building provides a varied color palette and articulation that provide definition and interest. The buildings have been designed in a similar style and color palette as the neighboring senior apartment complex to the east of the subject property. The three-story apartment building uses a variety of materials and massing schemes that provide articulation. Architectural details include balconies, window trim, and "Craftsman" details such. as gable end knee braces, and wood porch supports (on the third floor). A community room (with a kitchen) and outdoor patio area are provided on the third floor and laundry facilities are provided on the second floor. Landscaped areas are included in the front and rear setbacks as. well as along the westerly property line. 5. That the proposed housing development is compatible with the . surrounding neighborhood. The surrounding area supports a mixture of multiple -family residential, single- family residential, and commercial uses to which the proposed multiple -family residential use at this site will .be compatible. Surrounding land uses include a two-story apartment complex to the north across Workman Avenue, and a school to the northeast. A Chrysler -Jeep car dealership is located to the south and west, and a senior citizen housing complex is located to the east. Single-family houses are located easterly of the existing senior citizen housing complex. The proposed project, as designed, should not pose any adverse impacts on these surrounding properties, either physically or aesthetically. Development Standard Deviations The "Low. and Moderate -Income and Senior Citizen Housing" section of the Zoning Code was developed to encourage the construction of affordable housing projects. One of the.methods developed was the ability to grant deviations from zoning standards without processing a variance request for senior or affordable housing projects. This allows the City to review and determine those deviations that are appropriate at the subject property. The applicant is requesting several deviations, which are listed below. Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Workman\Staff report.doc ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 09 1838 E. Worlanan Avenue November 10, 2009 - Page 7 150 ft. 134 ft. 20 units per acre 59.1 units per acre 137 spaces 68 spaces 1 covered, 1 open 0 covered Max 55% 88% 200' 331'. Front (North) Min.15' Avg. 20' 15' Side(West) 10, 8' Side(East) 10, 68' Rear(South) 20' 5.5' 575 sq. ft. 630-702 sq. ft. 13,000 sq. ft. 9,600 sq.ft. at 200 sq. ft./unit 75'X 75' min 40'X 240' 160 cubic feet/unit 63 cubic feet/unit 1. Lot Width The West Covina Municipal Code requires lots zoned "MF-20" (Multiple -Family Residential — 20 Units Per Acre) to be a minimum of 150 feet in width. The subject property is 134 feet, 4 inches in width. The property is currently zoned "Specific Plan No. 22" and was previously zoned "NE-20". The proposed development is similar to the senior housing project constructed to the east of the subject property. The development has been designed to be compatible with the surrounding land uses. In addition, the project has been designed to allow Fire Department access requirements. 2. Density The proposal to construct 65 dwelling units on a 1.10-acre (47,793 square feet) site equates to a density of 59.1 units per acre. The increase in density equates to a density bonus of 200 percent above the otherwise allowable density of 20 units per acre that would be permitted under the proposed zoning of "MF-20." Although Municipal Code Sec. 26-678.2 currently limits a density bonus to a maximum of 160%, . a zoning code amendment is being processed to change that limitation to a maximum of 200%. The Conditional Use Permit and the Precise Plan approvals are both contingent upon the approval of the 200% density bonus ordinance. 3. Off -Street Parking Spaces Requirements Section 26-506.(b)(1) of the Zoning Code requires two parking spaces per unit for multiple -family dwellings, with one space' per unit enclosed on three (3) sides and roofed. An additional ten (10%). percent of the required parking is required to be provided for guest parking and be dispersed throughout the site. Based on the Municipal Code development standards the proposed 65-unit project would require 65 covered spaces, 65 uncovered spaces, and an additional 7 guest parking spaces. A total of 68.uncovered parking.spaces are proposed, which is a ratio of 1.05 spaces per unit. Section. 26-678.4(a) of the Zoning . Code specifically provides for deviations to parking standards as an incentive for senior citizen housing based on Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Workman\Staff report.doe ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 09 _ 1838 E. Workman Avenue November 10, 2009 - Page8 an evaluation of expected demand. The lowest parking ratio than can be permitted is 0.75 spaces per unit. It is generally accepted that senior citizen housing generates less demand for parking thanother types of housing, and this demand is even less still for lower - income senior citizens. The location of the subject property allows the use of the City "Go West" transit which travels on Workman Avenue (with a stop located on Workman Avenue on either side of Azusa Avenue) and Foothill Transit 280, which travels on Azusa Avenue. Furthermore, the subject location is within a quarter - mile of the West Covina Village Shopping Center, which includes a grocery store. The adjacent senior housing complex to the east of the subject property was developed with 68 parking spaces for 86 units, a ratio of .79 parking spaces per unit. There has not been a significant parking issue at that complex since its development in 2002. The office manager has indicated that currently there is sufficient parking for those residents that have vehicles. Section 26-506(b)(2) of the Zoning Code also requires that a minimum of one parking space per. unit be enclosed ,on three (3) sides and roofed. The applicant is not proposing to provide any covered parking and is requesting a deviation from covered parking requirements. Section 26-506(c)(1) of the Zoning Code requires that all uncovered parking spaces have a minimum dimension of 9 feet in width and 20 feet in depth. The proposed parking spaces are 8 feet, 9 inches in width and 18 feet in depth. The applicant is requesting a deviation from standards for parking space dimensions. 4. Maximum Ground Coverage Section 26-510 of the Zoning Code establishes standards for the maximum ground coverage of 55 percent in multiple -family residential zones. The ground coverage includes structures, garages, and all paved areas. The applicant is proposing ground coverage of 41,983 square feet. The'proposed ground coverage is 88 percent. The applicant is requesting a 33 percent deviation from the ground coverage requirement. 5. Maximum Building Length Section 26-512 of the Zoning Code establishes the maximum building length of 200 feet. The intent of this requirement is to provide for a break in the mass of proposed buildings. The building is divided into segments on the easterly side of the building by the Fire Department turn -around., Additionally, the balconies project from the building wall providing articulation. The proposed building has a length. of 331 feet. The applicant is requesting a deviation of 131 feet. If the building were divided into two buildings in compliance with code standards, the number of units would have to be reduced. 6. Setbacks Section 26-507 of the Zoning Code establishes standards for building setbacks from property lines. "MF-20" Zone standards for three-story buildings are as follows: Front — Minimum 15 feet, Average 20 feet Side — 10 feet Rear — 20 feet With respect to the front yard, the proposed front setback is 15 feet from exterior of the central corridor. That portion of the building projects, in front of the remainder of the building. The building wall to the east of the central portion of the building is setback 21 feet, 3 inches. The building wall to the west of the central portion of Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Worlanan\Staff_report.doc ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 09-u4 1838 E. Workman Avenue November 10, 2009 - Pa ee99 the building is setback 20 feet. Therefore the average setback across the length of the building frontage is less than 20 feet. Because the 24-unit condominium development was previously approved, a seven - foot dedication has been deeded to the City along. the front . property line of the subject property. The neighboring property to the east (existing senior housing) was approved with an irrevocable offer of dedication seven feet in width. An irrevocable offer of dedication' does not immediately affect the location of the front property line, but rather gives the City the right to take the property when the City intends to widen Workman Avenue.. Therefore, the front property. line on the. subject property is seven feet farther from the street than the front property line on the neighboring property to the east. As. a result, while the proposed front setback is 15 feet, it will be two feet farther from the street than the senior citizen housing building to the east. The site is situated between a property zoned "S-C" and developed with an automobile dealership and a property zoned "M-P and developed with senior housing. The required side setbacks for the proposed project are l0 feet. The building, which is proposed to be situated on the westerly side of the site, is set back 68 feet from the easterly property line (adjacent to senior housing). The westerly side setback is proposed to be 10 feet to the building face and 8 feet to the patios and balconies. The decreased setback should not therefore pose a significant impact to the adjoining property as it is developed with an automobile dealership. The rear setback is required to be 20 feet. The face of the building is set back 10 feet from the rear property line. A trash enclosure is proposed adjacent to the rear building wall and is setback from the rear property line by,five feet, six inches. This minor encroachment should not pose a significant impact as the rear of the site adjoins the storage area for West Covina Chrysler Jeep. 7. Unit Size The West Covina Municipal Code establishes minimum unit sizes for apartments in the Multiple -Family Residential section (Section 26-513). In the "MF-20" zone unit sizes for one -bedroom units are required to be a minimum of 725 square feet. The "Low- and Moderate -Income and Senior Citizen Housing" section of the Municipal Code further provides for reduced minimum unit sizes. Section 26- 678.4 establishes reduced minimum unit sizes as an incentive for the development of, senior citizen housing. This section states that a one -bedroom unit be a minimum .of 575 square feet: '_The applicant is proposing 65 one -bedroom units in the four different sizes, 630 square feet, 638 square feet, 653 square feet, and 702 square feet. These unit sizes are. in compliance with the standards for a senior citizen housing unit. 8. Recreational -leisure space Section 26-514 of the Zoning Code requires the provision of 200 square feet of usable recreational/leisure space for each dwelling unit. Qualifying space cannot be in the front yard and must have a minimum dimension of 75 feet. With 65 units, the requirement for the proposed project is, 13,000 square feet. As proposed, landscaped space is provided in the side and rear yard, however the minimum dimension of 75 feet is not provided. An 816-square foot Community Room and a 400-square foot patio are proposed on the third floor of the building. Each unit is provided with a 32-square foot balcony or patio area. The applicant is requesting a deviation from recreational -leisure space requirements. 9. Private Storage Section 26-518 of the Zoning Code requires the provision of 160 cubic feet in an enclosed storage space for each dwelling unit with no dimension less than two feet. Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Worlgnan\Staff_report.doc T ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 09S • 1838 E. Worlanan Avenue November 10, 2009 - Page 10 Further, the storage cabinet must be placed within a carport, garage or in a cabinet accessible from the exterior and in close proximity to the unit. The intent of this requirement was to provide extra storage capacity in the parking areas for apartment or condominium projects. Since there are no garages or carports proposed, there are no storage areas proposed in the parking area. The applicant is proposing an exterior storage area of 63 cubic feet that is accessible from the balcony of each unit. Summary The development standards for the "MF-20" Zone were established on the basis of facilitating development with a maximum density of 20 units per acre. In order to facilitate the proposed density of 59.1 units per acre, adherence to all of the development standards of the 'W-20" Zone becomes infeasible. The requested deviations are needed in order to allow the proposed number of units to be accommodated on the site with maximum efficiency. The proposed project deviations will not have a demonstrably negative impact on the site development, layout, safety or the comfort of the project's residents, or the neighboring properties. Precise Plan The 1.10-acre site has been graded for the construction of a 24-unit condominium project. The lot is rectangular in shape and relatively flat. In order to facilitate the development of the 24-unit condominium project, retaining walls were constructed on the sides and the, rear of the subject property. Along the rear (southerly) property a retaining wall approximately five feet in height was constructed. The retaining walls along the side property line begin at five feet at the rear of the property and gradually reduce in height toward the front property line. A subterranean pump will be placed at the rear of the lot to pump water to the street. The proposed design includes a long, linear building on the westerly side of the property and surface parking on the east. The building is proposed to be three - stories in height, with a manager's unit on the ground floor. A total of 68 parking spaces are provided on site. At the center of the property, a Fire Department turn- around has been designed to allow for fire trucks to turn around and eliminate the need for a fire truck to back out of the lot onto Workman Avenue. A 20-foot by 20- foot "notch" has been removed from the center of the building along the east elevation. Architecture and Site LUout The design of the site includes a three-story building and a parking area on the easterly portion of the site. The front of the building includes stone veneer accents and a front door in the center of the elevation. While the front door functions as an exit, not an.entrance, it has been designed with a "Craftsman" style door and accent molding. The main building entrance is located in middle section of the eastern elevation of the building. The proposed building has a stucco exterior with simulated stone veneer accents and a composition shingle roof. The building has balcony features, which provide articulation and serve to break up the mass "of the east and west elevations. The proposal includes some features which are "Craftsman" in style, including porch support columns on the third floor and exposed knee braces on the gables. Proposed colors for the senior housing project are range from white, light gray to light blue. The stone veneer is "Virginia Ledge/Golden Sand" manufactured by Coronado Stone. The base and the building columns would be a gray color, with the upper portions of the elevations a light gray color. Horizontal accent will be painted blue while the trim on the third storywill be white. The roof comprised of asphalt shingles in a slate gray color. Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Workman\Staff report.doc ZC 09-01, PP 09-03, CUP 01 1838 E. Worlanan Avenue November 10, 2009 - Page 11 The proposal includes an 816-square foot community room on the third floor of the structure. The community. room includes a kitchen and a restroom. A 400-square foot patio area is also proposed on the third floor. This patio is above the 20-foot by 20-foot "notch" for the Fire Department to maneuver a fire truck. The patio is located across the hallway from the community room. The applicant has also provided a number of seating alcoves along the hallways in the building. All of the units are one -bedroom units and include a kitchen and a restroom. The units range from 630 square feet to 702 square feet. One of the units is the manager's unit,. which is the 702-square foot unit. The manager's unit includes a bedroom and an office. The total living space floor area proposed for the project is 41,907 square feet, not including the 9,698 square feet of hallways and common areas. Information on setbacks is provided in the conditional use permit section of the report. A vehicular entry gate is proposed. In addition, security fencing is proposed to separate the interior of the lot from the street frontage. Pedestrian gates will be located on the east and west sides of the building. Four parking spaces are located outside. the vehicular entry gates to allow parking for guests. No rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed on the plans.. Air conditioners and heaters will be provided in each unit in the balcony area in combination with the water. heater. A trash enclosure is proposed behind the building. The trash enclosure would be enclosed by a block wall and includes a roof. Parking & Circulation Access to the site. will be via a single 26-foot wide driveway from Workman Avenue. The project is located approximately 280 feet east of the intersection of Azusa Avenue and Workman Avenue. Senior citizen housing developments typically do not generate the same levels of traffic compared to standard residential development; either on a daily basis or during peak morning and afternoon commute hours. Additionally, fewer seniors own vehicles than do the remainder of the adult population. Therefore, as analyzed below, the proposed project is not expected to significantly impact traffic within the surrounding area. According to the Trip Generation Handbook, 8 h Edition (Handbook) prepared by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, senior housing generates a weekday average of 3.48 trips per unit. This is approximately 40 percent less than the estimated 5.81 trips per day generated by typical multi -family residential development. The Traffic Study, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates indicates,that the proposed project of 65 units.would generate 228 trips per day. The entrance to the site from Workman Avenue will allow left or right-hand turning movements when either entering or exiting the site. A total of 68 parking spaces are proposed for the site. Of those parking spaces, the four located outside the entry gates will function as guest parking spaces, while 64 spaces will be available for the residents. The parking area is a dead-end drive aisle. Per the Parking Lot Design Standards, a 12-foot wide turnaround is located at the rear of the parking area to allow vehicles to turnaround if all the spaces are occupied. If the Commission felt it was more beneficial to have an additional parking space, that turnaround area could be converted to a parking space, increasing the number of parking spaces to 69. The negative to that approach is that cars would then have to back out of the parking area if all the spaces were occupied at the rear of the lot. Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Workman\Staff report.doc ZC 09-01,.PP 09-03, CUP 09-0 • 1838 E. Worlanan Avenue November 10, 2009 - Page 12 VII. CONCLUSION The applicant has made an effort to design the proposed project to be compatible with the existing senior housing project located immediately adjacent to the east. The front elevation incorporates three California -roof elements, wood shutters and stone veneer on the elevation and on the block wall. The massing along the side elevations has been minimized by providing balconies, window accents, arches and roof articulation. The proposed. project provides needed affordable housing for lower -income senior citizens., . In. order to. accomplish this objective while making the project economically feasible, it is necessary to increase the allowable density for the site and allow certain other deviations from the development standards of the "MF-20" Zone. These modifications are in compliance with the purpose of "Low- and Moderate -Income and Senior .Citizen Housing" section of the West, Covina . Municipal Code. The project has been designed so as to properly adjust the use to the site and the surrounding area, and provide for the necessary features and amenities to provide a desirable living environment for the residents of the project. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt resolutions recommending to the City Council certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approval of Zone. Change No. 09-01, and approval of Precise Plan No. 09-03, and Conditional Use Permit No. 09-04. PREPARED BY: Je erson Acting City Planner Attachments: Attachment 1 — Negative Declaration Resolution Attachment 2 — Zone Change Resolution Attachment 3 — Conditional Use Permit Resolution Attachment 4 — Precise Plan Resolution Attachment 5 — Initial Study Z:\Case Files\PP\2009\09-03 Sr Hsing.1838 E Workman\Staff_ report. doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 —November 10. 2009 ATTACHMENT 6 Motion by Sotelo, seconded by Redholtz, to waive further reading of the body of the resolution, and adopt Resolution. No. 0975341, recommending to the City Council approval of Code Amendment No. 09-03. Motion carried 5-0. Chairman Stewart stated that final action regarding this matter would be considered by the. City Council at a public hearing tentatively scheduled for December 15, 2.009. (4) ZONE CHANGE NO.09-01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.09-04 PRECISE PLAN NO. 09-03 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPLICANT: Tom Corley, Pacific. Development LOCATION: 1838 East Workman Avenue REQUEST: The project consists of a request for a zone change to change the designation from "Specific Plan No. 22" to ."Multiple -Family Residential" (20 dwelling units .per acre) (MF-20).. A precise plan is requested to construct a three-story senior citizen housing project consisting of 65 one -bedroom apartments. In addition, a conditional use permit, is requested to allow consideration of the proposal for affordable senior housing. Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing. Acting City Planner Jeff Anderson presented the staff report. During his presentation, Mr. Anderson told the Commissioners that this request was for a senior housing project. He also spoke about the history of the property, previous project approvals on the site, and the existing uses for the adjacent properties. In addition, Mr. Anderson reviewed the proposal, including setbacks, Fire Department access, proposed elevations, the location of the proposed parking lot, the number of parking spaces required, architectural treatments and proposed patio. Mr. Anderson also told the Commission that the units would be one -bedroom units appropriate for senior citizens and they would be affordable. Mr. Anderson also stated that the existing utility poles would remain in place, rather than being placed underground. PROPONENT: Michael Lizzaraga, President and CEO of TELACU, said he was present to answer any questions by the Commission. Iry Berman, architect for the project, told the Commission that there are trash and laundry chutes included for each floor of the building. He added that there are also sitting areas and a laundry area provided. OPPONENT: Joanne Wilner spoke to the Commission regarding her concerns with the lack of storage space, the location of the trash bins, and small size of the recreation area provided. Further she expressed her concern that the property would not be able to accommodate the high density proposed, and the high percentage of ground coverage. In addition, she spoke regarding the funding of the project. Chairman Stewart closed the public hearing. There was a discussion by the Commission regarding the high density of the project, the safety of the residents, the request allow the utilities to remain above ground, and the cost to the City of West Covina. Commissioner Redholtz stated his support of the project, saying this location provided many amenities and complied with the General Plan. Commissioners Sotelo and Carrico also expressed their support of the project and agreed with the comments made by Commissioner Redholtz. Commissioner Sykes expressed his concern with the density and safety of the senior citizens living at the location if there were a disaster. He also stated his concern with the utilities not being placed underground and the cost to the City of West Covina. However, ZAPLANCOM\MINUTES\2009 MINUTES\1 1. 10.09 minutes.doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 - November 10, 2009 he agreed with the remainder of the Commission that this project will fill a need for low - to moderate -income housing and stated that he would support the proposed project. Chairman Stewart said that he felt this project would be harmonious with the surrounding area and expressed his support. Motion by Redholtz, seconded by Sotelo, to adopt findings as recommended by staff. Motion carried 5-0. Motion by Redholtz, seconded by Sotelo, to waive further reading of the body of the resolution and adopt Resolution No. 09-5342, recommending to the City Council certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Zone Change No. 09-01, Conditional Use Permit No. .09-04 and Precise Plan No. 09-03. Motion carried 5-0. Motion by Redholtz, seconded by Sotelo, to adopt findings as recommended by staff. Motion carried 5-0. Motion by Redholtz, seconded by Sotelo, to waive further reading of the body of the resolution and adopt Resolution No. 09-5343, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 09-01. Motion carried 5-0. Motion by Redholtz, seconded by Sotelo, to adopt findings as recommended by staff. Motion carried 5-0. Motion by Redholtz, seconded by Sotelo, to waive further reading of the body of the resolution and adopt Resolution No. 09-5344, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 09- 04. Motion carried 5-0. Motion by Redholtz, seconded by Sotelo, to adopt findings as recommended by staff. Motion carried 5-0. Motion by Redholtz, seconded by Sotelo, to waive further reading of the body of the. resolution and adopt Resolution No. 09-5345, approving Precise Plan No. 09-03. Motion carried 5-0. Chairman Stewart stated that the actions regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 09-04 and Precise Plan No..09-03 are final unless appealed to the City Council within ten days. Final action regarding Zone Change No. 09-01 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will considered by the City Council at a public hearing tentatively scheduled for December 15, 2009. (5) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.09-12 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION APPLICANT: Stephan.Schmidt for 501 Vincent, LLC LOCATION: 501 S. Vincent Avenue, Suite 103 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting the approval of a conditional use permit to operate vehicle service bays with retail services within an existing 5,807-square foot retail building. The site is located in the "Service Commercial" (SC) Zone. Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing. Senior Planner Fabiola Wong presented the staff report. During her presentation, she spoke about the history of the property and the type of use that was proposed. Ms. Wong also spoke about staff s recommendation to require decorative roll -up. doors and decorative light structures. Staff recommended approval of the project. Commissioner Redholtz asked staff a question about the public notification. Staff stated that public notification requirements had been fulfilled. ZAPLANCOMMINUTES\22009 MINUTESU 1.10.09 minutes.doc ATTACHMENT 7 City of West Covina WEST MR Fire Fire Department DATE: November 9, 2009 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Rick Genovese, Fire Marshal / Assistant Chief RE: 1838 East Workman Avenue The West Covina Fire Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, has reviewed items pertaining to Zone Change 09-0.1, Precise Plan 09-03 and Conditional Use Permit 09-04. The Bureau has found that the proposed plans comply with the 2007 California Fire Code and 2006 International Fire Code.