The URL can be used to link to this page

11-21-2017 - Government Tort Claim Denial - Item No. 1.pdfAGENDA ITEMNO. 1 AGENDA STAFF REPORT City of West Covina I Office of the City Manager DATE: TO: FROM: November 21, 2017 Mayor and City Council Chris Freeland City Manager SUBJECT: GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM DENIAL RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council deny the following Government Tort Claim and the claimant be notified: • Steven O'Bryant vs. The City of West Covina DISCUSSION: As you are aware, since all claims should be considered potential lawsuits, it is requested that all Councilmembers refrain from making specific public comments so as not to prejudice any claim. Specific questions should be referred to the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Prepared by: Nick Ledesma Administrative Aide Reviewed and Approved by: Edward Macias Human Resources Director AGENDA ITEMNO. 2 AGENDA STAFF REPORT City of West Covina I Office of the City Manager DATE: November 21, 2017 TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Chris Freeland SUBJECT: City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 2329 APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 17-01, RELATED TO THE UPDATING OF TWO PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY RECOMMENDATION: It is recommend that the City Council adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 2329 -AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 17-01, RELATED TO THE UPDATING OF TWO PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY. DISCUSSION: This ordinance was introduced at the West Covina City Council Meeting of November 7, 2017. The purpose of this ordinance is to change the zoning designations of two parcels within the City of West Covina. Site No. I is a small parcel located to the southwest of 1530 W. Cameron Avenue that is owned by the City. The site is currently vacant and has a zoning designation of Office Professional. The property at 1530 W. Cameron Avenue was previously zoned as Office Professional but was changed to General Urban as part of the Downtown Plan. Since the small parcel is only contiguous to one property, it is recommended that the zoning match 1530 W. Cameron Avenue. The City purchased 707 S. Lark Ellen in November of 2016, as part of the effort to expand Cameron Park. The proposal is to change the zoning designation from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Open-Space (0-S) to match the existing park. The ordinance will take effect 30 days after its adoption on November 21, 2017. Z:\Case Files\GPA \2017\17-0 I \CC\Ord 2329 -second reading SR 11.21.17.docx FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed ordinance, if adopted, would not have any fiscal impact. Prepared by: Approved by: Je n erson p:::: Senior Administrative Assistant ATTACHMENTS: Attachment No. 1 -Proposed Ordinance No. 2329 Attachment No. 2 -Staff Report No. 17 dated November 7, 2017 Z:\Case Files\GPA\2017\17-01\CC\Ord 2329 -second reading SR 11.21.17.docx ATTACHMENT NO. 1 0 R D I N A N C E N 0. 2 3 2 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 17-01, RELATED TO THE UPDATING OF TWO PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 2017, the Planning Commission initiated a code amendment to consider changing the zoning of two parcels within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving required notice, did on the 1 ou, day of January, 2017, conduct a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 17-5921 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 17-01; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered evidence presented by the Planning Commission, Planning Department, and other interested parties at a duly advertised public hearing on the 7th day of November, 2017; and WHEREAS, studies and investigations made by this Council and on its behalf reveal the following facts: 1. Parcel 8468-016-901 is zoned Office-Professional, but was excluded from the Downtown Plan and Code update which changed the adjacent commercial and office properties to the General Urban zoning designation in the Downtown Plan. 2. Parcel 8486-008-002 was purchased by the City in November of 2016 as part of the effort to expand the City's parkland. The proposal would be to change the zoning designation from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Open-Space (0-S) to match the existing park (Cameron Park). 3. The proposed action is considered to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section I5061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the proposed action consists of a zone change, which does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, by the City Council of the City of West Covina does ordain as follows: SECTION NO. 1: The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. Ordinance No. 2329 Zone Change No. 17-01 November 21, 2017 -Page 2 SECTION NO. 2: Based on the evidence presented and the findings set forth, Code Amendment No. 14-04 is hereby found to be consistent with the West Covina General Plan and the implementation thereof and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practices require Zone Change No. 17-0 I. SECTION NO. 3: Based on the evidence presented and the findings set forth, the City Council of the City of West Covina approves Zone Change No. 17-01 to assign the land use designations as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION NO. 4: The City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that Zone Change No. 17-01 will have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3)). SECTION NO. 5: Any provision of the West Covina Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION NO. 6: Should any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable or otherwise void, that determination shall have no effect on any other provision of this Ordinance or the application of this Ordinance to any other person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable. The City Council of the City of West Covina declares that it would have adopted all the provisions of this Ordinance that remain valid if any provisions of this Ordinance are declared invalid. SECTION NO. 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, causing it to be posted or published as required by law and it shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Z:\Case Files\GPA \2017\17-01 \CC\ZC Ordinance.doc Ordinance No. 2329 Zone Change No. 17-01 November 21, 2017 -Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ___ , 2017. ATTEST: Nickolas S. Lewis City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF WEST COVINA ) Corey Warshaw Mayor I, Nickolas S. Lewis, City Clerk of the City of West Covina, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 7'" day of November, 2017. That, thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _ day of ____ 2017. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney Z:\Case Files\GPA\2017\17-0 I \CC\ZC Ordinance.doc Ordinance No. 2329 Zone Change No. 17-01 November 21, 2017 -Page 4 EXHIBIT A ZONE CHANGE PARCELS SITE N0.1 APN: 8468-016-901 Southwest of 1530 W. Cameron Avenue Proposed Zoning: General Urban (G-U) Z:\Case Files\GP A\2017\17-0 I \CC\ZC Ordinance.doc Ordinance No. 2329 Zone Change No. 17-01 November 21, 2017 -Page 5 E Mobeck St Cameron Park -UJ ...Y .... ~ VJ E Cameron Ave SITE NO. 6 APN: 8486-008-002 (707 S. Lark Ellen Ave.) North of Cameron Park Proposed Zoning: Open Space (0-S) Z:\Case Files\GP A \201 7\17-0 I \CC\ZC Ordinance.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. AGENDA STAFF REPORT City of West Covina I Office of the City Manager DATE: November?,2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Chris Freeland City Manager SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 17-01 ZONE CHANGE N0.17-01 GENERAL PLAN REVISIONS TO 9 PARCELS AND ZONE CHANGE FOR TWO PARCELS RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and Planning staff recommend that the City Council adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2017-107 -A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 17-01, RELATED TO LAND USE DESIGNATION REVISIONS ON THE GENERAL PLAN MAP The Planning Commission and Planning staff further recommend that the City Council introduce the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 2329 -AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 17-01, RELATED TO THE UPDATING OF TWO PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY BACKGROUND: The City adopted a new General Plan on December 20, 2016. A total of nine parcels were inadvertently not identified on the adopted map. The entire map includes 19,866 parcels. The purpose of this update is to provide General Plan land use designations for those nine parcels. A zone change is also proposed for two parcels to bring them into conformance with neighboring 17 General Plan Amendment. 17-01 & Zone Change 17-01 Map Cleanup Page 2 of 5 ~ November 7, 2017 properties. The purpose of the hearing is to discuss the proposed General Plan land use and zoning designations. The proposal is for a General Plan amendment for nine parcels and a zone change for two parcels within the City. Because many of the parcels do not have addresses, the Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) are provided. The Planning Department is processing the parcels in two applications ( General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 and Zone Change No. 17-01) and processing concurrently for efficiency. On September 12, 2017, the Planning Commission initiated a General Plan amendment and zone change in order to begin the process to update maps. On October I 0, 2017, the Planning Commission adopted resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 and Zone Change No. 17-0 I to the City Council. DISCUSSION: The following chmi contain information on the subject parcels. The sites have been identified by number and some sites have multiple parcels. Parcel numbers have been provided, as well as addresses if they exist. Also included in the charts is the lot size, use, the previous designation and proposed designation. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Site Parcel Current Use Previous GP Proposed GP No. Desi!mation Desienation 8468-016-901; 2,700 SF Vacant Office Neighborhood 1 (Southwest of 1530 W. Medium Cameron Ave.) 2 8475-002-032; 11,450 SF Parking for Service & Commercial (1002 W. West Covina West Covina Neighborhood Parkway) Parkway Commercial Plaza 2 8475-002-903; 91,235 SF Parking for Service & Commercial (South of 1002 W. West West Covina Neighborhood Covina Parkway) Parkway Commercial Plaza 3 8475-006-017; 2,412 SF Commercial Regional Commercial (944 W. West Covina Improvements Commercial Parkway) Z:\Case Files\GP A \2017\17-01 \CC\Staff Report.docx General Plan Amendment. 17-01 & Zone Change 17-01 Map Cleanup Page 3 of5 -November 7, 2017 Site Parcel CurrentUse No. . 3 8475-006-053; 14,815 SF Commercial (934 W. West Covina Improvements Parkway) 3 8475-006-916; 9,118 SF Open Space (East of934 W. West Covina Parkway) 3 8475-006-054; 7,020 SF Commercial (401 S. Vincent Avenue) Improvements 4 8482-039-073; 56,595 SF HOA (Northeast corner of S. Citrus Common Street and Las Rosas Drive) Area 5 8743-018-903; 59,285 SF Landscape (Southeast corner of E. Maintenance Fairgrove Ave. and Parkside District Dr.) Previous GP Proposed GP Desi2nation . Desilmation Regional Commercial Commercial Regional Parks and Open Commercial Spaces Regional Commercial Commercial Residential Very Parks and Open Low Spaces Residential Parks and Open Medium Spaces Site No. 1 is a small parcel located to the southwest of 1530 W. Cameron Avenue that is owned by the City. As the small parcel is only contiguous to one property, it is recommended that the General Plan designation match 1530 W. Cameron Avenue. Site No. 2 is located along West Covina Parkway west of California Avenue. These properties include a parcel owned by the Flood Control District and the other owned by Parkway Plaza and both properties are used for parking. Site No. 3 is located along West Covina Parkway east of California Avenue. This site consists of four parcels, tluee privately owned and developed, and one owned by the City. Site No. 4 is located north of the intersection of Citrus Street and Las Rosas Drive. The parcel is owned by the Las Rosas Homeowners Association and is developed as an open space lot. Site No. 5 is located east of Fairgrove Avenue and Parkside Drive. The parcel is owned by the City and is located in Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. Z:\Case Files\GP A 12017117-01 \CC\Staff Report.docx General Plan Amendment. 17-01 & Zone Change 17-01 Map Cleanup Page 4 of 5 -November 7, 2017 ZONE CHANGE The City will also be processing a zone change for two parcels. Site Parcel Current Use Existing Zoning No. 1 8468-016-901; 2,700 SF Vacant Office (Southwest of 1530 w. Professional Cameron Ave.) (0-P) 6 8486-008-002; 35,384 SF Single-Family Single-Family (707 S. Lark Ellen) Residence Residential (R-1) Proposed Zoning General Urban (G- U) Open-Space (0-S) Site No. 1 is a small parcel located to the southwest of 1530 W. Cameron Avenue that is owned by the City. The site is currently vacant and has a zoning designation of Office Professional. The property at 1530 W. Cameron Avenue was previously zoned as Office Professional but was changed to General Urban as part of the Downtown Plan. Since the small parcel is only contiguous to one property, it is recommended that the zoning match 1530 W. Cameron Avenue. The City purchased 707 S. Lark Ellen in November of 2016, as part of the effort to expand Cameron Park. The proposal would be to change the zoning designation from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Open-Space (0-S) to match the existing park. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 10, 2017. The Commissioners reviewed the proposed General Plan amendment and zone change. Two residents spoke in support of the proposed changes. Vicky Bargaehr, a resident who lives at 2975 Las Rosas, asked for clarification between the Open Space designation and the Neighborhood Low designation. Upon clarification, she urged the Commission to designate the parcel of land at Citrus Street and Las Rosas Drive as Open Space. Shirley Lee, resident, also supported the Open Space designation for that parcel. The Commission discussed the difference between the two designations of Neighborhood Low and Open Space. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission voted 4-0 (Redholtz absent, excused) to adopt Resolution Nos. 17-5920 and 17-5921 and recommend approval of the General Plan amendment and zone change to the City Council. LEGAL REVIEW: The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved the proposed resolution and ordinance as to form. Z:\Case Files\GPA\2017\17-01 \CC\Staff Report.docx General Plan Amendment. 17-0 l & Zone Change 17-01 Map Cleanup Page 5 of 5 -November 7, 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The proposed General Plan amendment and zone change are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines in that it consists of a General Plan amendment and zone change, which do not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed General Plan amendment and zone change would not have any direct fiscal impact to the General Fund. Prepared by: erson, AICP P anning Director ATTACHMENTS: Attachment No. 1 -Draft General Plan Amendment Resolution No. 2017-107 Attachment No. 2-Draft Zone Change Ordinance No. 2329 Attachment No. 3 -Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-5920 Attachment No. 4 -Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-5921 Attachment No. 5 -Planning Commission Staff Report, October 10, 2017 Attachment No. 6 -Planning Commission Minutes, October 10, 2017 (Excerpt) Attachment No. 7 -Planning Commission Staff Report, September 12, 2017 Attachment No. 8 -Planning Commission Minutes, September 12, 2017 (Excerpt) Z:\Case Files\GPA \2017\17-01 \CC\Staff Report.do ex ATTACHMENT N0.1 RESOLUTION N 0. 2017 -107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 17-01, RELATED TO LAND USE DESIGNATION REVISIONS ON THE GENERAL PLAN MAP GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 17-01 CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT APPLICANT: LOCATION: City of West Covina Assessor's Parcel Number (APN): 8468-016-901, 8475-002-032, 8475- 002-903, 8475-006-017, 8475-006-053, 8475-006-916, 8475-006-054, 8482-018-903, and 8743-018-903 WHEREAS, on the 12'" day of September, 2017, the Planning Commission initiated a general plan amendment to consider assigning land use designations to nine parcels within the City as shown on Exhibit "A." on those certain properties generally described as: Assessor's Parcel Number (APN): 8468-016-901, 8475-002-032, 8475-002-903, 8475- 006-017, 8475-006-053, 8475-006-916, 8475-006-054, 8482-018-903, and 8743-018-903 in the records of the Los Angeles County Assessor; and WHEREAS, it is a stated policy of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to provide for a range of non-residential uses that will ensure a strong economic base for the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving required notice, did on the 1 ou, day of January, 2017, conduct a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 17-5920 recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 17-01; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered evidence presented by the Planning Commission, Planning Department, and other interested parties at a duly advertised public hearing on the 7'" day of November, 2017; and WHEREAS, studies and investigations made by this Council and on its behalf reveal the following facts: I. The City adopted a new General Plan on December 20, 2016. 2. A total of nine parcels, as identified by the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN), did not have a land use identified on the adopted map: 8468-016-901, 8475-002-032, 8475-002- Resolution No, 2017-107 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 November 7, 2017 -Page 2 903, 8475-006-017, 8475-006-053, 8475-006-916, 8475-006-054, 8482-018-903, and 8743-018-903. 3. The proposed action is considered to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 1506l(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the proposed action consists of a general plan amendment, which does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of West Covina as follows: SECTION NO. 1: The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION NO. 2: Based on the evidence presented, both oral and documentary, the City Council approves General Plan Amendment No. 17-01, amending the land use designation for the subject properties as set forth on the Land Use Map of the Land Use Element as depicted on Exhibit A; and SECTION NO. 3: The City Council finds that adoption of this Resolution is exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 will have a significant effect on the enviromnent (CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3)). SECTION NO. 4: Should any provision of this Resolution, or its application to any person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable or otherwise void, that determination shall have no effect on any other provision of this Resolution or the application of this Resolution to any other person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable. The City Council of the City of West Covina declares that it would have adopted all the provisions of this Resolution that remain valid if any provisions of this Resolution are declared invalid. Z:\Case Files\GPA\2017\17-0 I \CC\GPA Resolution.doc Resolution No. 2017-107 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 November 7, 2017 -Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of ___ , 2017. ATTEST: Nickolas S. Lewis City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF WEST COVINA ) Corey Warshaw Mayor I, Nickolas S. Lewis, City Clerk of the City of West Covina, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 7th day of November, 2017. That, thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _ day of 2017. ---- AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney Z:\Case Files\GPA\2017117-01 \CC\GPA Resolution.doc Resolution No. 2017-107 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 November 7, 2017 -Page 4 EXHIBIT A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PARCELS SITEN0.1 APN: 8468-016-901 Southwest of 1530 W. Cameron Avenue Proposed General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Medium Z:\Case Files\GP A \2017\17-01 \CC\GPA Resolution.doc Resolution No. 2017-107 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 November 7, 2017 -Page 5 OVllhl Pkwy _ __,.. Pl.ua \'In, Co,u~ Walnut CrN.t -• 1i '"" '-"'''" fflY " PCICO -.. '"' -fflY ').,_, ttlll -'1111 )"t,,. --,,, --'·, ··-'>-.. l'l,uu Wtll Co~''° - SITE NOS. 2 AND 3 APNS: 8475-002-032, 8475-002-903, 8475-006-017, 8475-006-053, 8475-006-916, and 8475-006-054 South side of West Covina Parkway Proposed General Plan Designation: Commercial and Parks and Open Spaces (8475-006-916, shown outlined in pink) Z:\Case Files\GP A\2017\17-0 I \CC\GP A Resolution.doc Resolution No. 2017-107 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 November 7, 2017 -Page 6 ~ I ~~ / ~~ il:9'.00 !\,.:::; ~fl, o" '?~ 1IOOl'/l ~ ~ SITEN0.4 APN: 8482-039-073 ... a "' ro ~ Ct: V, ro .....J Northeast corner of S. Citrus Street and Las Rosas Drive Proposed General Plan Designation: Parks and Open Spaces Z:\Case Files\GP A\2017\ 17-0 I \CC\GP A Resolution.doc ... 0 ~© ro 'Ci ..:I ro "O C <t: Resolution No. 2017-107 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 November 7, 201 7 -Page 7 SITE NO. 5 APN: 8743-018-903 Southeast Corner of E. Fairgrove Ave. and Parkside Drive Proposed General Plan Designation: Parks and Open Spaces Z:\Case Files\GP A \2017\17-0 I \CC\GP A Resolution.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 2 0 R D I N A N C E N 0. 2 3 2 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 17-01, RELATED TO THE UPDATING OF TWO PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 2017, the Planning Commission initiated a code amendment to consider changing the zoning of two parcels within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving required notice, did on the 10th day of January, 2017, conduct a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 17-5921 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 17-01; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered evidence presented by the Planning Commission, Planning Department, and other interested parties at a duly advertised public hearing on the 7th day of November, 2017; and WHEREAS, studies and investigations made by this Council and on its behalf reveal the following facts: I. Parcel 8468-016-901 is zoned Office-Professional, but was excluded from the Downtown Plan and Code update which changed the adjacent commercial and office properties to the General Urban zoning designation in the Downtown Plan. 2. Parcel 8486-008-002 was purchased by the City in November of 2016 as part of the effort to expand the City's parkland. The proposal would be to change the zoning designation from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Open-Space (0-S) to match the existing park (Cameron Park). 3. The proposed action is considered to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 1506l(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the proposed action consists of a zone change, which does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, by the City Council of the City of West Covina does ordain as follows: SECTION NO. 1: The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. Ordinance No. 2329 Zone Change No. 17-01 November 7, 2017 -Page 2 SECTION NO. 2: Based on the evidence presented and the findings set forth, Code Amendment No. 14-04 is hereby found to be consistent with the West Covina General Plan and the implementation thereof and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practices require Zone Change No. 17-01. SECTION NO. 3: Based on the evidence presented and the findings set forth, the City Council of the City of West Covina approves Zone Change No. 17-01 to assign the land use designations as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION NO. 4: The City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that Zone Change No. 17-01 will have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3)). SECTION NO. 5: Any provision of the West Covina Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION NO. 6: Should any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable or otherwise void, that detetmination shall have no effect on any other provision of this Ordinance or the application of this Ordinance to any other person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable. The City Council of the City of West Covina declares that it would have adopted all the provisions of this Ordinance that remain valid if any provisions of this Ordinance are declared invalid. SECTION NO. 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, causing it to be posted or published as required by law and it shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Z:\Case Files\GPA 12017117-01 ICCIZC Ordinance.doc Ordinance No. 2329 Zone Change No. 17-01 November 7, 2017 -Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ___ , 2017. ATTEST: Nickolas S. Lewis City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF WEST COVINA ) Corey Warshaw Mayor I, Nickolas S. Lewis, City Clerk of the City of West Covina, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 7111 day of November, 2017. That, thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of 2017. ---~ AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney Z:\Case Files\GPA\2017\17-01\CC\ZC Ordinance.doc Ordinance No. 2329 Zone Change No. 17-01 November 7, 2017 -Page 4 EXHIBIT A ZONE CHANGE PARCELS SITEN0.1 APN: 8468-016-901 Southwest of 1530 W. Cameron Avenue Proposed Zoning: General Urban (G-U) Z:\Case Files\GP A \2017\17-0 I \CC\ZC Ordinance.doc Ordinance No. 2329 Zone Change No. 17-01 November 7, 2017 -Page 5 E Mobeck St SUBJECT PROPERliY Cameron Park E Cameron Ave SITEN0.6 APN: 8486-008-002 (707 S. Lark Ellen Ave.) North of Cameron Park Proposed Zoning: Open Space (0-S) Z:\Case Files\GPA \2017\17-0 I \CC\ZC Ordinance.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION R E S O L U T I O N N 0. 17-5920 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 17-01, RELATED TO THE UPDATING OF NINE PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0.17-01 GENERAL EXEMPTION APPLICANT: City of West Covina LOCATION: Citywide WHEREAS, on the I2tl1 day of September, 2017, the Planning Connnission initiated a general plan amendment to consider assigning land use designations to 9 parcels with the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Connnission, upon giving the required notice, did on the 1 Otl1 day of October, 2017, conduct a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, studies and investigations made by this Connnission and in its behalf reveal the following facts: 1. The City adopted a new General Plan on December 20, 2016. 2. A total of 9 parcels, as identified by the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN), did not have a land use identified on the adopted map: 8468-016-901, 8475-002-032, 8475-002-903, 8475-006-017, 8475-006-053, 8475-006-916, 8475-006-054, 8482-018-903, and 8743-018-903. 3. The proposed action is considered to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the proposed action consists of a general plan amendment, which does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Connnission of the City of West Covina as follows: Pla1ming Commission Resolution No. 17-5920 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 October 10, 2017 -Page 2 SECTION NO. 1: The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION NO. 2: Based on the evidence presented and the findings set forth, General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 is hereby found to be consistent with the West Covina General Plan and the implementation thereof and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practices require General Plan Amendment No. 17-01. SECTION NO. 3: Based on the evidence presented and the findings set forth, the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of West Covina that it approves General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 to assign the land use designations as shown on Exhibit "A." SECTION NO. 4: The Secretary is instructed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the City Council for their attention in the manner as prescribed by law and this Resolution shall go into force and effect upon its adoption. I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina, at a regular meeting held on the 10111 day of October, 2017, by the following vote. AYES: Heng, Jimenez, Holtz, Castellanos NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Redholtz DATE: October 10, 2017 Z:\Casc Filcs\GPA\2017\17-01\PC I 0.10.17\GPA Rcso.doc c.ierson, Secretary Pl nning Commission Plmming Commission Resolution No. 17-5920 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 October I 0, 2017 -Page 3 EXHIBIT A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PARCELS SITE N0.1 APN: 8468-016-901 Southwest of 1530 W. Camel'on A venue Proposed Genernl Plan Designation: Neighborhood Medium Z:\Casc Filcs\GPA\20 l 7\l 7-01\PC IO. l 0.17\GPA Rcso.doc Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-5920 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 October I 0, 2017 -Page 4 0\1111.1 f'I \'IY l/,11-1H',11ru,r1 ,l W w,,,.1 ( ov111;1 l'kwy 1 ,, v• '" ..,_ ~· .. 11 fv,to i ~'.'.'.::==-----------------::~SUL!1B~JECT PROPERTIES -----=~-.:.":::'•':::',..:''~" ... ;... ______ -~ ~ - -J tall .,_ \ ,,1 I ,.,j 1,1,1 .,,.l/ ... v , 1'1,,,/ 111' ,,<·'' .. ; / I l'it••t .. - 1111 11'1,,,,(, J ID I -I .. - ltll fU, • .,. -11''' 11,1 h ,. "'· ----\yllf,,,, I -'11111,, --., --ffll ---, 1111 ''-.. .. - SITE NOS. 2 AND 3 l ,•1<1l\',,11 .,,u1 .. I ... •, ffl / w/ APNS: 8475-002-032, 8475-002-903, 8475-006-017, 8475-006-053, 8475-006-916, and 8475-006-054 South side of West Covina Pal'kway Proposed Genel'al Plan Designation: Commet'cial and Pal'ks and Open Spaces (8475-006-916, shown outlined in pink) Z:\Cnsc Filcs\GPA\2017\17-01\PC 10.10.17\GPA Roso.doc <l. > ,( .., C': '" u " " V, Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-5920 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 October 10, 2017 -Page 5 llllm mmD /-00'.D!I OOm> / ~ ~/ 1}00JU 00:Ml l ,\'ii\ J' ();,.. ,.:.(J ((i, ..§ J\· -1t ~~' "~o 00W <-, ~ ~ I'- ~ )" mu .... ~ er LU \-----~\ ma a. 0 er a. ..... u w ...., CD ::> Cf) / SITEN0.4 APN: 8482-039-073 --a "' --:Y. 0 ~ '" 3 111ml Northeast corner of S. Citrus Street and Las Rosas Drive Proposed General Plan Designation: Pad{s and Open Spaces Z:\Cnsc Files\GPA\2017\17-01\PC I 0.10.17\GPA Rcso.doc --- mw ~ 0 '" ·c; _:J 10 "O L <( 11'.D) Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-5920 General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 October 10, 2017 -Page 6 SITE NO. 5 APN: 8743-018-903 ....__ Lt____ Southeast Corner of E. Fairgrove Ave. and Parkside Drive Proposed General Plan Designation: Pa1·ks and Open Spaces Z:\Cusc Files\GPA \2017\17-0 I \rC 10.10.17\GPA Reso.doc -- ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N 0. 17-17-5921 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 17-01, RELATED TO THE UPDATING OF TWO PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY ZONE CHANGE NO. 17-01 GENERAL EXEMPTION APPLICANT: City of West Covina LOCATION: Citywide WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 2017, the Planning Commission initiated a zone change to consider changing the zoning of 2 parcels with the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon giving the required notice, did on the 1 ott, day of October, 2017, conduct a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, studies and investigations made by this Commission and in its behalf reveal the following facts: I. Parcel 8468-016-901 is zoned Office-Professional, but was excluded from the Downtown Plan and Code update which changed the adjacent commercial and office properties to the General Urban zoning designation in the Downtown Plan. 2. Parcel 8486-008-002 was purchased by the City in November of 2016 as part of the effort to expand the City's parkland. The proposal would be to change the zoning designation from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Open-Space (0-S) to match the existing park (Cameron Park). 3. The proposed action is considered to be exempt from the provisions of the California Enviromnental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the proposed action consists of a zone change, which does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the enviromnent. Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-5921 Zone Change No. 17-01 October I 0, 2017 -Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina as follows: SECTION NO. 1: The above recitals are hue and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION NO. 2: Based on the evidence presented and the findings set forth, Zone Change No. 17-01 is hereby found to be consistent with the West Covina General Plan and the implementation thereof and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practices require Zone Change No. 17-01. SECTION NO. 3: Based on the evidence presented and the findings set forth, the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of West Covina that it approves Zone Change No. 17-01 to assign the zoning designations as shown on Exhibit "B." SECTION NO. 4: The Secretary is instructed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the City Council for their attention in the manner as prescribed by Jaw and this Resolution shall go into force and effect upon its adoption. I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of West Covina, at a regular meeting held on the 10111 day of October, 2017, by the following vote. A YES: Heng, Jimenez, Holtz, Castellanos NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Redholtz DATE: October 10, 2017 Z:\Cusc rilcs\GPA\2017\17-01\PC 10.10.17\ZC Rcso.doc erson, Secretary P nning Commission Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-5921 Zone Change No. 17-0 I October 10, 2017 -Page 3 EXHIBITB ZONE CHANGE PARCELS SITE N0.1 APN: 8468-016-901 Southwest of 1530 W. Cameron Avenue Proposed Zoning: General Urban (G-U) Z:\Casc Filcs\GPA\2017\17-01\PC I 0.10.17\ZC Rcso.doc Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-5921 Zone Change No. 17-01 October I 0, 2017 -Page 4 I I I ) I: fvh J 1,~ --k St r- -©871 'fl9JfJ SU BJECT PROPERliY (11 > <! r (]J ·-LLJ Carneron Pork ~ t.- flJ _J ~ rJ1 _) E Can1eron Ave l .. l ''!1 - SITE NO. 6 APN: 8486-008-002 (707 S. La1·k Ellen Ave.) North of Cameron Park Proposed Zoning: Open Space (0-S) Z:\Case Filcs\GPA\201 7\17-01 \PC I 0.10.1 7\ZC Reso.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 5 AGENDA ITEM NO. __ 4_,__ __ _ DATE October 10, 2017 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 17-01 ZONE CHANGE NO. 17-01 GENERAL EXEMPTION APPLICANT: LOCATION: I. SUMMARY City of West Covina Citywide The City recently adopted a new General Plan on December 20, 2016. A total of nine parcels were inadvertently not identified on the adopted map. The entire map includes 19,866 parcels. The goal is to provide General Plan land use designations for those nine parcels. A Zone Change is also proposed for two parcels to bring them into conformance with neighboring properties. The purpose of the hearing is to discuss the proposed General Plan land use and zoning designations. The proposal is for a General Plan Amendment for nine parcels and a Zone Change for two parcels within the City. Because many of the parcels do not have addresses, the Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) are provided. The Planning Depatiment is processing the parcels in two applications (General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 and Zone Change No. 17-01) and to process concurrently for efficiency. On September 12, 2017, the Planning Commission initiated a general plan amendment and zone change in order to begin the process to update maps. Z:\Case Files\GPA\2017\17-01\PC 10.10. I ?\Staff Report.doc General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 Zone Change No. 17-01 October 10, 2017 -Page 2 II. ANALYSIS The following chatt contains information on the subject parcels. The sites have been identified by number, some sites have multiple parcels. Parcel numbers have been provided, as well as addresses when they exist. Also included in the chart is the use, and the previous and proposed General Plan designations. 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 8468-016-901 (Southwest of 1530 W. Cameron Ave. 8475-002-032 (1002 W. West Covina Parkwa 8475-002-903 (South of 1002 W. West Covina Parkwa 8475-006-017 (944 W. West Covina Parkway 8475-006-053 (934 W. West Covina Parkwa 8475-006-916 (East of934 W. West Covina Parkwa 8475-006-054 ( 401 S. Vincent Avenue Vacant Parking for West Covina Parkway Plaza Parking for West Covina Parkway Plaza Commercial Improvements Commercial Improvements Open Space Commercial Improvements Pt~viiiil~ opt< i>riip····\isecfGP•·•,'•••,,··•·•• ······· · ·· · · ········· · · · ···· · · ·· · ·· · · 'n·/·.•e\s'1·,,.n'a>t1•'. ·o·.'•. 'n<.·.•.•.• .. ••. > ,,., r ij~~t'' ~ittili/Y Office Neighborhood Service & Neighborhood Commercial Service & Neighborhood Commercial Regional Commercial Regional Commercial Regional Commercial Regional Commercial Medium Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Parks and Open Spaces Commercial 4 8482-039-073 (Northeast corner of S. Citrus Street and Las Rosas Drive) HOA Common Area Residential Parks and Open Spaces 5 8743-018-903 (Southeast corner of E. Fairgrove Ave. and Parkside Dr. Landscape Maintenance District Z:\Case Files\GPA\2017117-01\PC I 0.10. 17\StaffReport.doc Very Low Residential Medium Parks and Open Spaces General Plan Amendment No. 17-0 I Zone Change No. 17-01 October I0,2017-Page3 The City will also be processing a Zone Change for two parcels. 8468-016-901 Vacant Office (Southwest of 1530 w. Professional Cameron Ave.) (0-P) 6 8486-008-002 Single-Single-Family (707 S. Lark Ellen) Family Residential (R-1) Residence General Urban (G-U) Open-Space (0-S) Site No. 1 is a small parcel located to the southwest of 1530 W Cameron Avenue that is owned by the City. The site is currently vacant and has a zoning designation of Office Professional. The propetty at 1530 W Cameron Avenue was previously zoned as Office Professional but was changed to General Urban as part of the Downtown Plan. Since the small parcel is only contiguous to one property, it is recommended that the zoning match 1530 W. Cameron Avenue. The City purchased 707 S. Lark Ellen in November of2016 as part of the effort to expand Cameron Park. The proposal would be to change the zoning designation from Single- Family Residential (R-1) to Open-Space (0-S) to match the existing park. IV. CONCLUSION Staff has prepared resolutions recommending approval of the General Plan amendment and Zone Change, as well as exhibits of the parcels to be affected. If the Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval of the proposed code amendment, the City Council will hold a public heaiing to consider adopting the proposed amendments. V. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed General Plan aniendment and Zone Change are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines in that it consists of a General Plan amendment and Zone Change, which do not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Z:\Case Files\GP A 12017117-01 IPC I 0.10.17\Staff Report.doc General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 Zone Change No, 17-01 October 10, 2017 -Page 4 VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 and Zone Change No. 17-01 to the City Council. PREPARED BY: Je derson, AJCP Planning Director Attachments: Attachment No. 1 -General Plan Amendment Resolution Attachment No. 2 -Zone Change Resolution Veronica Hernandez Assistant Planner Attachment No. 3 -Planning Conunission Minutes, September 12, 2017 Attachment No. 4-Planning Commission Staff Report, September 12, 2017 Z:\Case Files\GP A\2017\17-0 I \PC 10.10.17\Statf Report.doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 -October 10, 2017 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 Ckaiffll:oo. ll@lt:5 said this a@tisa is fiRal uHl@ss ~}J@al@d ts th@ City C@Wl@il ,vithift t@ft (lQ) Bays. 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 17-01 ZONECHANGEN0.17-01 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION APPLICANT: City of West Covina LOCATION: Assessor's Parcel Numbers (10 Parcels): 8468-016-901, 8475-002-032 (1002 W. West Covina Parkway), 8475-002-903, 8475-006-017 (944 W. West Covina Parkway), 8475-006-053 (934 W. West Covina Parkway), 8475-006-916, 8475-006-054 (401 S. Vincent Avenue), 8482-039-073, 8743-018-903, 8486-016- 901, and 8486-008-002 (707 S. Lark Ellen) REQUEST: Request for a general plan amendment for nine (9) parcels and a zone change for two (2) parcels within the City. Because many of the parcels do not have addresses, the Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) are provided above. The City recently adopted a new General Plan on December 20, 2016. A total of nine parcels did not have a land use identified on the adopted map. A zone change is proposed for two parcels to bring them into conformance with the neighboring properties. Planning Director Jeff Anderson presented the staff report. During his presentation he spoke about a small number of parcels that needed a General Plan designation. Chairman Holtz opened the public hearing. PROPONENTS: Vicky Bargaehr, resident who lives at 2975 Las Rosas, asked for clarification between the Open Space designation and the Neighborhood Low designation. Upon clarification, she urged the Commission to designate the parcel of land at Citrus and Las Rosas as Open Space. Shirley Lee, resident, also supported the Open Space designation for that parcel. There was a short discussion by the Commission regarding the difference between the two designations. There was also a discussion regarding the changing the General Plan designation from Low Residential to Open Space. OPPONENTS: No one spoke in opposition. Chairman Holtz closed the public hearing. Z:\PLANCOMIMINUTES\2017 MINUTES\! 0.10.17 minutes.doc Platming Commission Minutes Page 5 -October 10, 2017 Motion by Castellanos, seconded by Holtz, to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 17-5920, recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 17-01. Motion carried 4-0 (Redholtz absent, excused.) Motion by Castellanos, seconded by Holtz, to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No.17-5921, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 17-01. Motion carried 4-0 (Redholtz absent, excused.) Chairman Holtz said final action on this matter will take place at a public hearing before the City Council on a date to be determined. NON IIEi\JUNG ITEMS N@ne COJ>ITR>lUATIO:!'l OF ORAL COMMUJ>lICATIOJ>l8 COMMI8SI0J>l REPORTS/COMMENTS ANQ MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Chairman Il@ltz r@€Jtt@st@8 that staff malrn a ffil=ffl:al t=@~@st ts lrn alll@ t@ dim th@ lights 8tW.iftg p@•x@r p@iftt pr@s@fttati@fts. Chairt¥Ulft Il@ltz als@ sp@k@ alrnttt th@ C©ttft@il IJrisffi:@tiftg lN@rlcsh@p @ft Thttrse:lay, O@t©@@t= 12, 2917 in th@ lN@st C@vhia ggm@r Cfflt@r at C@Ft@ZJ Park, aft8 th@ L@gislativ@ Br@akfast @ft Thtlfs8ay, O@t©@@r 12, 2917 ff@m 8 a.m. t@ 19 a.1n. in th@ C@mm.ttfti1:>• R@@:m an8 C@ttn@il Chat11h@rs at \V@st C@vifta Ci1:>• 1Iall. §. ti. PLAJ>lJ>IR>IG QIRECTOR'S REPORT: a. F@Fth@@ming, O@t@h@r 24, 2Q17 ll. Plaftflittg IJrir@@t@r J@ff Afte:l@rs@ft ts18 th@ C@mmissi@ft that th@ir r@gular m@@tittg @ft N@v@m@@r 14, 2917 will @@ @an@@ll@8 00@ ts th@ Sp@@ial City C@ttn@il m@@ting s@h@dtd@S ffir that @vfflittg. CITY COUJ>lCIL ACTIOJ>l: R@gttlarm@@tiftg, O@t@h@r 3, 2Q17 C@ft@ral Plan 8tttms R€l}1@¥t: R@galar m@@tittg, O@t@h@r 17, 2917 Cl@fte:l@ra Av@oo@ R@8@sig11 Z:\PLANCOM\MINUTES\2017 MINUTES\10. I0.17 minutes.doc TO: Planning Connnission FROM: Planning Department ATTACHMENT NO. 7 City of West Covina Memorandum AGENDA ITEM N0., __ 4:..,__ DATE: September 12, 2017 SUBJECT: INITIATION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE The City of West Covina is initiating a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for several parcels within the City. The City recently adopted a new General Plan on December 20, 2016. The following parcels were left out of the original General Plan update and thus do not currently have a General Plan designation. Land use designations will be assigned in order to provide consistency with the surrounding areas. The following chart contains information on the parcels to be affected and their proposed General Plan designations: Parcel< . ', ',' •,' ·.· Eiisti:tlli<@P,Di~ilriiai:i.on'c '\,Pionosetl<GPDesi<mation 8468-016-901 None Neighborhood Medium (Southwest of 1530 w. Cameron Ave.) 8475-002-032 None Commercial (1002 w. West Covina Parkway) 8475-002-903 None Commercial (South of 1002 W. West Covina Parkway) 8475-006-017 None Commercial (944 w. West Covina Parkway) 8475-006-053 None Commercial (934 w. West Covina Parkway) 8475-006-916 None Connnercial (East of 934 w. West Covina Parkway) 8475-006-054 None Commercial (401 S. Vincent Avenue) Z:\Case Files\GPA \2017\17-01 \Initiation 9 .12.17\GP A and ZC Initiation Staff Report.doc Study Session -Initiation of Code Amendments September 23, 2013 -Page 2 8482-039-073 (Northeast comer of S. Citrus Street and Las Rosas Drive 8743-018-903 (Southeast corner of E. Fairgrove Ave. and Parkside Dr.) None None Neighborhood Low Neighbo1hood Medium The City will also be processing a Zone Change for two parcels. 8468-016-901 (Southwest of 1530 W. Cameron Ave.) 8486-008-002 707 S. Lark Ellen Office-Professional (0-P) Single-Family Residential (R-1) General Urban (G-U) Open-Space (0-S) Parcel 8468-016-901 is located to the south of 150 W. Cameron Avenue, north of the Walnut Creek Wash and east of a residential neighborhood off Sherway Street. The parcel is 2,700 square feet in size. The parcel is owned by the City and currently has no General Plan designation. It is zoned Office-Professional, but was excluded from the Downtown Plan and Code update which changed the adjacent commercial and office properties to the General Urban zoning designation. The parcel is situated between the Walnut Creek Wash to the south, a public street to fue west, and 1530 W. Cameron Avenue to the north. A zone change is proposed in order to bring fue parcel into conformance with the neighboring property. Parcel 8486-008-002 (707 N. Lark Ellen Avenue) is located to the north of Cameron Park. The .08-acre parcel was purchased by the City in November as part of the eff01t to expand the City's parkland. The proposal would be to change the zoning designation from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Open-Space (0-S) to match the existing park. The Planning Department has decided to process the parcels in two applications (General Plan Amendment 17-01 and Zone Change 17-01) and to process concurrently for efficiency. CONCLUSION The Zoning Code states that General Plan amendments and zone changes proposed by the City are initiated by a resolution of the City Council or Planning Commission. Resolutions Z:\Case Files\GPA\2017\17-01 \GPA and ZC Initiation Staff Report.doc Study Session -Initiation of Code Amendments September 23, 2013 -Page 3 to initiate the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change have been provided to allow the Commission to act upon the initiations. A public healing will be held to consider the proposed general plan amendment and zone change. Planning Commission will then make a recommendation and the entitlements will be presented to the City Council for consideration. RECOMMENDATION If the Planning Commission detennines that it is appropriate, adopt the resolutions to initiate the general plan amendment and zone change. REVIEWED AND APPROVED: Jeff ~on: AICP Planning Director Attachments: PREPARED BY: v. Attachment No. 1-Initiation Resolution, General Plan Amendment No. 17-01 Attachment No. 2 -Initiation Resolution, Zone Change No. 17-01 Attachment No. 3 -Maps of Affected Parcels Z:\Case Files\GP A 12017\17-01 \GP A and ZC Initiation StaffRepmt.doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 September 12, 2017 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 @@ft@ttrr@€l that th@r@ ar@ a suffi@ioot fttilfifJ@r @f}Jarlci11g Sf)a@@s Wlaila81@ fur stu€l@ftts aftd fa@ttlty @fth@ s@h@@l. ),1eti@tt hy Cast@lhm:@s, s@@@ftd@d fly I1@11g, t@ v.raiv@ ftu=tfl:@r F@adittg aftd adspt R@s@ltiti@ft l»T@. 17 5998 8fJpF@vi11g C@n€liti@ftal Us@ P@ffl1it }T@. 17 Q9. ),1@ti@n @affi@d 3 Q (II@ltz a\.Js@ftt, @K@tts@d, Jim@ft@Z OOstaitt@d.) Csmmissi@n@F R@dhsltz said this a@ti@ft is tiftal tud@ss SfJp@al@~ t@ th@ City C@ttn@il ;vithin t@ft (lQ) days. NON HEARING ITEMS 4. STUDY SESSION -INITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE Discussion regarding the initiation of a general plan amendment and zone change for Cameron Park. Assistant Planner Veronica Hernandez presented the staff report. During her presentation she told the Commission that certain parcels of land located in the city were left off the General Plan map and currently have no general plan designation. She identified the parcels for the Commission and made recommendations for general plan designations. In addition she identified two parcels located at 707 Lark Ellen Avenue and 1530 Cameron Avenue that also need a zone change. After a brief discussion the Commission concurred with staffs recommendation. Motion by Redholtz, seconded by Castellanos, to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 17-5909 initiating a general plan amendment for various properties within the city. Motion carried 4-0 (Holtz absent, excused.) Motion by Castellanos, seconded by Redholtz, to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 17-5910 initiating a zone change for two properties within the city. Motion carried 4-0 (Holtz absent, excused.) CONTINUATION Of ORAI-s COMMUl'IICATIONS Z:\PLANCOM\MJNUTES\2017 MINUTES\9.12.17 minutes.doc Delfino "Chino" Public Works D unji, P.E. or/City Engineer Reviewed and Approved by: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 AGENDA STAFF REPORT City of West Covina I Office of the City Manager DATE: November 21, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Colincil FROM: Chris Freeland City Manager SUBJECT: TRAFFIC COMMITTEE MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 18, 2017 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the attached minutes of the Traffic Committee Meeting held on October 18, 2017. ATTACHMENT: Attachment No. 1 — Traffic Committee Minutes from October 18, 2017 ATTACHMENT NO. I MEETING MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC COMMITTEE CITY OF WEST COVINA DATE: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 TIME: 3:00 PM LOCATION: City Hall, Room 314 Management Resource Center ATTENDEES: Chino Consunji, Miguel Hernandez, Lew Gluesing, Patrick Taylor, Wanda Horton, Michael Scott 1. Minutes from September 20, 2017 Approved by the Committee 2. Matters from the Audience A. Mr. Patrick Taylor and Ms. Wanda Horton West Covina residents living on E. Mardina Street spoke to the Committee in favor of a recent request for permit parking on their street explaining that with the adjacent apartments, parking has become very limited and it is difficult for the homeowners to park at their residences. The committee explained that a survey has been completed and that this item will be on the November 15, 2017 Traffic Committee meeting and that all residents within 300' of the street will be notified prior to the meeting. B. Mr. Michael Scott, West Covina resident living on Workman Avenue expressed appreciation for the recently installed traffic calming measures at the curves in the 1200 block of Workman Avenue, but asked if there was more that can be done since motorists still appear to be speeding. He suggested stop signs, however, the Committee explained that stop controls are not effective in controlling speeds and can be problematic if not warranted under State and national criteria. Beyond additional enforcement, the committee didn't have any further recommendations at this time, but will continue to explore alternative measures. 3. Old Business — None. 4. New Business A. Approve installation of red curb on the east side of Orange Avenue at certain intersections between Eldred Avenue and Workman Avenue. In response to a citizen concern that it is difficult to exit onto Orange Avenue from the side streets of Eldred Avenue, Chetney Drive, Swanee Lane, Padre Drive, Thelborn Street, and Workman Avenue due to sight visibility limitations, City Staff reviewed all locations to assess the need for new or additional red curb. Lew Gluesing reported that when vehicles are parked along Orange Avenue, sight visibility is reduced depending on how many and where vehicles are parked. A review of the collision history for a recent three (3) year period at the study intersections revealed a total of four (4) collisions susceptible to correction by the installation of red curb. Notices were sent out to residents within 300' of the study intersections requesting comments and informing them that this item would be considered at this meeting. 2 No one attended the meeting regarding this item, and no correspondence was received. Based on his findings, Lew Gluesing recommended that new and additional red curb be installed at the study intersection in accordance with City standards and noted that installation of the red curb will reduce the overall parking in the vicinity of the intersections by approximately 30%. The Committee concurred with the recommendation and approved the installation of new and additional red curb at each intersection as shown on the attached Exhibit A. B. Approve installation of additional red curb on Lark Ellen Avenue at 1345 East Mcwood Street. Lew Gluesing reported that he received a complaint regarding difficulty turning left onto Lark Ellen Avenue from Mcwood Street due to cars parked on the west side of Lark Ellen Avenue north of Mcwood Street. Lew Gluesing noted that there is approximately 50 feet of existing red curb north of Mcwood Street leaving approximately one parking space next to the driveway at the subject property. Based on the City's standards for red curb, a minimum of 70' of red curb is required; however, based on the observed prevailing speeds and actual physical conditions of the roadway, a minimum of 90' of red curb is required to provide adequate sight distance for the intersection. A review of the collision history for a recent three (3) year period at the intersection did not reveal any related collisions. Notices were sent out to residents within 300' of the intersection requesting comments and informing them that this item would be considered at this meeting. No one attended the meeting regarding this item, and no correspondence was received. Based on his findings, Lew Gluesing recommended installation of additional red curb in order to meet the needed sight distance visibility. It was also noted that additional parking is available on Mcwood Street adjacent to the property. The Committee concurred with the recommendation and approved the installation of additional red curb shown on the attached Exhibit B. C. Approve installation of No Stopping Anytime signs on the south side of East Garvey Avenue North between McDonalds' restaurant and west of Hollenbeck Avenue. Lew Gluesing reported that he had been contacted by Public Works Maintenance Division Staff who had received a complaint that vehicles parked on the south side of East Garvey Avenue North were creating a hazard due to the narrow lane width for eastbound traffic. A field review of the area confirmed that the widening of the 1-10 Freeway had left insufficient width to allow parking in certain areas and that both restriction of parking and restriping of the street are necessary to correct the problem. Notices were sent out to residents within 300' of East Garvey Avenue North between McDonalds' restaurant and 400' west of Hoilenbeck Avenue requesting comments and informing them that this item would be considered at this meeting. No one attended the meeting regarding this item; however, two residents responded by email expressing concern for the removal of parking. One of the residents noted that not all of the area under consideration was too narrow for parking. After further review, the Committee agreed that some parking restriction is needed and approved the installation of No Stopping Anytime signs for about 825' on the south side of Garvey Avenue and restriping of the street centerline by Ca!trans as determined to be appropriate by the City Traffic Engineer. 3 Based on this, it was determined that No Stopping Any time signs are needed between the McDonalds' and the driveway at the Tuscany Villas Apartments at 1945 East Garvey Avenue North (approximately 1,000' in length) and that the centerline striping needs to be repositioned from just east of McDonalds' restaurant and approximately 400' west of Hollenbeck Avenue (approximately 1/2 mile in length) as shown on the attached Exhibit C. 5, Committee Member Comments — None. 6. Adjourn - Meeting adjourned at 4:00 P.M. Next meeting date is November 15, 2017. 4 EXHIBIT A LEGE isi6 mon PAINT NEW OR EXTEND RED CURB EXHIBIT B ( \\ i DATE: TO: FROM: AGENDA ITEMNO. _4_ AGENDA STAFF REPORT City of West Covina I Office of the City Manager November 21, 2017 Mayor and City Council Chris Freeland City Manager SUBJECT: ADDING ONE CROSSING GUARD AT SAN JOSE CHARTER ACADEMY RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: I. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement amendment with All City Management Services (ACMS) for one additional crossing guard assigned to San Jose Charter Academy; and 2. Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the necessary budget amendment: RESOLUTION NO. 2017-111 -A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2017, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 (ADDITIONAL FUNDS ADDING 1 CROSSING GUARD) DISCUSSION: On June 3, 2014, the City Council first approved an agreement with All City Management Services (ACMS) to provide school crossing guard services at 19 locations within West Covina. More recently, on September 19, 2017 (agenda item no. 12), the City Council authorized the continuation of these services under the same agreement with ACMS. San Jose Charter Academy has expressed interest in adding one more crossing guard to its location, and paying the City for this additional cost. ACMS provided a price quote for this one additional I, crossing guard, starting on December I, 2017, and running through the end of the current school ADDING ONE CROSSING GUARD AT SAN JOSE CHARTER ACADEMY Page 2 of2 -November 21, 2017 year. The cost totals $5,967 .90-see Attachment No. 1. This additional service can be secured by an amendment to the ACMS agreement-see Attachment No. 2. FISCAL IMPACT: As detailed in the proposed budget amendment, Staff is recommending a General Fund expenditure appropriation of $5,968. Prepared by: Alex B. Houston Police Administrative Services Manager Reviewed/ Approved by: . r-A-_ m~ 1-pf~ Marc Taylor ' d Chief of Police Interim Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Attachment No. 1 -Price Quote from ACMS Attachment No. 2 -Amendment to ACMS Agreement Attachment No. 3-ResolutionNo. 2017-111, withExhibit 1 ( , \ ( ATTACHMENT NO. 1 All City Management Services Inc. Client Worksheet 2017 -2018 0epartment: 5603 Billing Rate for 2017/2018: $17.45 Quote to a<l~guard at Sari ;Jo~¢ Charter effective 1~11zzrr17 Sites with traditional calendar: 3 114 I Site at 3 hrs per day Total Hrs/day X days/yr X City of West Covina 1444 W. Garvey Ave. West Covina, CA 91790 $17.45 = Hourly Billing Rate TOTAL PROJECTED HOURS 342 TOTAL ANNUAL PROJECTED COST $5,967.90 $5,967.90 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM AGREEMENT ATIACHMENT NO. 2 THIS Amendment Number One ("Amendment") to the Crossing Guard Program Agreement ("Agreement") made and entered into this 21st day of November, 2017 by and between ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, a California corporation (hereinafter "Contractor''), and the City of West Covina, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "City"). RECITALS A. WHEREAS, on June 3, 2014, Contractor and City entered into a Crossing Guard Program Agreement; and B. WHEREAS, on September 19, 2017, Contractor and City extended that Agreement for the 2017-18 school year; and C. WHEREAS, Contractor and City agree to amend the Agreement to include on additional crossing guard assigned to San Jose Charter Academy in West Covina. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. Contractor agrees to assign and staff 1 additional crossing guard at San Jose Charter Academy in West Covina, commencing on December 1, 2017, and running through the end of the 2017-2018 school year. 2. City agrees to pay contractor an additional amount, up to $5,967.90, for this additional crossing guard, through the end of the 2017-18 school year. 3. Except as provided in this Amendment, all other provisions, terms, and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. CITY OF WEST COVINA CHRIS FREELAND City Manager Date ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES Name: Title: Date ( APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: Kimberly Hall Barlow NICK LEWIS City Attorney City Clerk By: By: Date Date ( I ATTACHMENT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2017, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 (ADDITIONAL FUNDS ADDING 1 CROSSING GUARD) WHEREAS, the City Manager, on or about June 22, 2017, submitted to the City Council a proposed budget for the appropriation and expenditure of funds for the City for West Covina for Fiscal Year 2017-18; and WHEREAS, following duly given notice and prior to budget adoption, the City Council held a public meeting on June 22, 2017, receiving, considering and evaluating all comments, and adopted a budget for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2017 and ending June 30, 2018; and WHEREAS, amendments must periodically be made to the budget to conform to changed circumstances following adoption of the budget. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Budget Amendment No. 069 is hereby approved as reflected on Exhibit No. 1, attached hereto. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 2017. APPROVED AS TO FORM Kimberly Hall Barlow City Attorney Corey Warshaw Mayor ATTEST Nickolas S. Lewis City Clerk I, HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of West Covina, California, at a regular meeting thereof on the 21st day of November, ( 2017 by the following vote of the City Council: ( ( AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Nickolas S. Lewis City Clerk Date: Requested by: Dept/Div: EXPENDITURES Account Number 110.31.3121.6120 REVENUES Account Number CI1Y OF WEST COVINA BUDGET AMENDMENT 11/21/2017 Alex Houston Police Dept/Account Description Contractual Services Account Description REASON/JUSTIFICATION (Please be specific) BA# 069 Posted By: Date Posted: Exhibit No. 1 Fiscal Year: 2017-18 --~~~~~-------Amount: $5,968.00 Description: Additional crossing guard service funds noposea Current Budget Amendment Amended Budget 179 037.00 5,968.00 185,005.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Proposea Current Budget Amendment Amended Budget - - - - - To appropriate additional expenditures for 1 additional crossing guard at San Jose school, approved by City Council on 11/21/2017. These additional expenditures will be offset by revenues received from San Jose school, alreadv annronriaterl in account 110.31.4571. APPROVALS City Council Approval Date (if required, attach minutes): Dept Head Approval: Finance Director: Funds Available? City Manager: (If over $100,000) see attached o Yes oNo see attached __ l_l~/_2_1~/~2~0~1~7_o Approval Not Required Date: ------- Date: ______ _ Date: ------- o A roved o Denied ( ( DATE: TO: FROM: AGENDA ITEMNO. 5 AGENDA STAFF REPORT City of West Covina J Office of the City Manager November 21, 2017 Mayor and City Council Chris Freeland City Manager SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ON PUENTE AVENUE AT NORA A VENUE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bid from PTM General Engineering Services, of Riverside, California in the amount of $35,936, and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with PTM General Engineering Services for the work to be completed. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Committee at their March 15, 2017 Meeting, reviewed a request for additional traffic controls at the school crosswalk on Puente Avenue at Nora Avenue to enhance pedestrian safety. The City's Traffic Engineer collected data needed for the wanants for the installation of traffic control devices at crosswalks in accordance with the State of California traffic safety guidelines, which includes traffic volumes, pedestrian volumes, roadway speeds, sight visibility and the vertical and horizontal alignment of the roadway. After review of the data, the City's Traffic Engineer recommended the installation of rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) and the Traffic Committee concurred with the recommendation. On April 4, 2017, the City Council reviewed and approved the Traffic Committee's recommendation for the installation ofRRFB at the school crosswalk located on Puente A venue at Nora Avenue. Award of Contract to Install RRFB Page 2 of 3 -November 21, 2017 DISCUSSION: Included in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017-18 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget is the installation of flashing beacons at various locations in the City. This particular project will install a RRFB on Puente Avenue at Nora Avenue. The work includes installation of 14-foot poles, bi- directional and uni-directional beacons, solar panels, controller cabinets, thermo-plastic yield lines, and incidental work. In accordance with Section 22032 of the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, projects below $45,000 may be completed by the City's workforce, by a negotiated contract, or via a purchase order. In an effort to get competitive pricing, staff obtained quotes for the installation of the RRFB by contacting the following firms: . Contractor . ·.· . . Location · .... ••'.'. .. ·.··'.'.•• :Bid'..Aniount•::: .. . . · . .. PTM General Engineering Services Riverside, CA $35,936 Macadee Electrical Construction. Chino, CA $ 47,369 MSL Electric, Inc. Anaheim, CA No Response PTM General Engineering Services submitted the lowest quote to install the RRFB on Puente Avenue at Nora Avenue in the amount of $35,936. OPTIONS: The City Council has the following options: 1) Approve staffs recommendation; or 2) Direct staff to advertise for bids. Since a favorable quote was received and within budget, it is unlikely that seeking new bids would reduce costs any further; or 3) Provide alternative direction. FISCAL IMP ACT: The total estimated project costs are broken down as follows: No, ·.··. Item . Amount .• . · . '. . . . 1. Construction Contract $35,936 2. Contingency (10%) 3,594 . Total $39,530 . . . . .· . ( ( ( Award of Contract to Install RRFB Page3 of3-November21,2017 The total approved budget for installation of flashing beacons as pait of the FY 2017-18 CIP budget is $150,000 with funding coming from Measure R. The funds available for this project are as follows: 'Pro·ectNo. Amount. 18031 MeasureR 18031.224.7800 $39,530 $39;530 There is no impact to the General Fund. Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved by: andez Public Works Project Supervisor ~~~·ffi Interim Finance Director ATTACHMENT: Attachment No. I -Contract Agreement with PTM General Engineering Services CITY OF WEST COVINA CONTRACT SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. FOR RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONS AT PUENTE A VENUE AND NORA A VENUE (CONTRACT# PW.014.2017) TIDS CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT (herein "Agreement"), is made and entered into thls 21'' day of November, 2017 by and between the CITY OF WEST COVINA, a municipal corporation, (herein "City") and PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. (herein "Contractor"). The parties hereto agree as follows: A. City requires the installation of a Rectangular Rapid Flashing: Beacons system services that meet the requirements as shown in the project specifications and thls contract. Contractor has represented to City that Contractor is qualified to perform said services and has submitted a proposal to City for same. B. City desires to have Contractor perfonn said services on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing Recitals and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of whlch is acknowledged by both parties, City and Contractor hereby agree as follows: 1. SERVICES OF CONTRACTOR 1.1 Scope of Services -In compliance with all terms and conditions of thls Agreement, the Contractor shall provide those services specified in Section 3 ("Description of Work") of Section V ("Special Provisions") of the Instructions to Bidders, whlch services may be referred to herein as the "services" or "work" hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into thls Agreement, Contractor represents and wan·ants that Contractor is a provider of first class work and services and Contractor is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein and, in light of such status and experience, Contractor covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in pe1forming the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, fit for the purpose intended. 1.2 Documents Included in Contract -Thls contract consists of the (1) Bid Documents (inclusive of the (a) Proposal (b) Statement ofNon-collusion by Contractor (2) Contract Documents (inclusive of ( a) Agreement; (b) Performance Bond; ( c) Warranty Bond; ( e) Supplemental Information to be completed by Principal; (:f) Tax Identification Fmm; (g) Guarantee; (h) Substitution of Equals; (5) Special Provisions, all Exhlbits to the Special Provisions and attachments to it whlch are incorporated as if fully set forth herein. In the event of an inconsistency between any of the terms in thls Agreement and any of the above, thls Agreement shall govern. 1 ( ( ( 1.3 Compliance with Law -All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental agency having jurisdiction in effect at the time the work is performed. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments -Contractor shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement, including a business license from the City. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Contractor's performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold hannless City against any such fees, assessments, taxes penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. Contractor shall be responsible for all sub-contractors' compliance with this Section 1.4. 1.5 Familiarity with Work -By executing this Contract, Contractor wanants that Contractor ( a) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be pe1formed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be perf01med, and ( c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Contractor warrants that Contractor has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, plior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Contractor discover any latent or unlmown conditions, which will matelially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Contractor shall inlmediately inf01m the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contractor's lisk until wlitten instructions are received from the Contract Officer. 1.6 Care of Work-The Contractor shall adopt reasonable methods duling the life of this Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. 1. 7 Further Responsibilities of Parties -Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other. Contractor shall require all sub-contractors to comply with the provisions of this Agreement. 1.8 Additional Services -City shall have the light at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be uudertalcen unless a written change order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Contractor, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perfo1m this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Contractor. Any increase in compensation of the Contract Sum, or in the time to perform of one hundred eighty (180) days or less may be approved by the Contract Officer except as provided in West Covina Municipal Code section 19-302. Any increases which cannot be approved by the Contract Officer as provided in West Covina Municipal Code section 19-302, taken either separately or cmnulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by 2 Contractor that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. Contractor hereby aclmowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Contractor anticipates and that Contractor shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. 1.9 Prevailing Wages Laws -This project requires the payment of prevailing wages under California Law. In accordance with Labor Code Section 1770, et seq., the director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has ascertained a general prevailing rate of wages which is the minimum amount which shall be paid to all workers employed to perform the work pursuant to this Agreement. A copy of the general prevailing wage rate determination is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Section 1810, et seq., eight (8) hours is the legal working day. Contractor must forfeit to the City Twenty Five Dollars ($25.00) a day for each worker who works in excess of the minimum working hours for which Contractor does not pay overtime. Contractor is required to post a copy of such wage rates at all times at the contract site. The statutory penalties for failure to pay prevailing wage or to comply with State wage and hour laws will be enforced. Contractor also shall comply with State law requirements to maintain payroll records and shall provide for certified records and inspection of records as required by California Labor Code Section 1770, et seq., including Section 1776. Contractor shall comply with all statutory requirements relating to the employment of apprentices. 2. COMPENSATION 2.1 Contract Sum -For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, the Contractor shall be compensated as specified herein, but not exceeding the maximum contract amount of Thirty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Six and Noll 00 Dollars ($35,936.00) (herein "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.8. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Contractor at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City; Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. 2.2 Progress Payments -Prior to the first day of the month, during the progress of the work, commencing on the day and month specified in the Agreement, Contractor shall submit to the Contract Officer a complete itemized statement of all labor and materials incorporated into the work during the preceding month and the portion of the contract sum applicable thereto. Upon approval in writing by the Contract Officer, payment shall be made in thirty (30) days. City shall pay Contractor a sum based upon ninety five percent (95%) of the contract price apportionment of the labor and materials incorporated into the work under the contract during the month covered by said statement. The remaining five percent ( 5%) of the Contract Smn shall be retained as performance security. Refer to Section 7.4 of this Agreement for retention of funds. 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3 .1 Time of Essence -Time is of the essence in the perfonnance of this Agreement. 3 .2 Schedule of Performance -Contractor shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the "Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit "A", if any, and incmporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Contractor, extensions to 3 ( ( the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Perfmmance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. 3.3 Force Majeure -The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for perfmmance of the services rendered pnrsuant to this Agreement shall be extended to the extent caused by delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency other than the City, if the Contractor shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes for the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for pe1forming the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. Contractor shall not be entitled to any damages or increase in compensation due to force majenre. 3.4 Term -Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 7.9 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until final approval and acceptance of the project by the Contract Officer. 4. COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representative of Contractor -The following principals of Contractor are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and malrn all decisions in connection therewith: PTM Engineering Services, Inc. Elizabeth H. Mendoza de Mc Rae, President/CFO Brian Mendoza, Vice President/Secretary/Project Manager It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible dnring the te1m of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Contractor without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer -The Contract Officer shall be such person as may be designated by the City Manager or City Engineer of City. The Contractor shall keep the Contract Officer infmmed of Contractor's progress on the services. The Contractor shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein or in the City's Municipal Code, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority to sign all documents on behalf of the City required by this Agreement. 4.3 Prohibition Against Assignment -The experience, lmowledge, capability and reputation of Contractor, its principals and employees were a snbstantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restl-icted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in conceit of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Contractor, taldng all transfers 4 into accmmt on a cumulative basis. In the event of any snch unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Contractor or any surety of Contractor of any liability hereunder without the City's express consent. 4.4 Independent Contractor -Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Contractor, its sub-contractors, agents or employees, performs the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Contractor's employees, sub- contractors, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Contractor shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its sub-contractors, agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Contractor in its business or otherwise or a joint venture or a member of any joint enterprise with Contractor. 4.5 Identity of Persons Performing Work -Contractor represents that it employs or will employ at its own expense all personnel required for the satisfactory performance of any and all tasks and services set forth herein. Contractor represents that the tasks and services required herein will be performed by Contractor or under its direct supervision, and that all personnel engaged in such work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized and permitted nnder applicable State and local law to perform such tasks and services. 4.6 Utility Relocation -City or the owner of any owner, and not Contractor, is responsible for removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunldine utilities but only to the extent such utilities were not identified in the invitation for bids or specifications. Where the specifications call for the Contractor to remove, relocate, reconstrnct or protect such lines, all such work shall be deemed included in the contract price. Contractor having been presented with a reasonable basis to suspect that any previously lmidentified main or trunldine may need to be removed, relocated or protected in place, Contractor shall immediately notify City and the affected utility company in writing of such belief, and the basis therefor, and Contractor shall thereafter work with the City and the utility company to coordinate such removal, relocation or protection. City shall reimburse Contractor for its reasonable costs incurred in locating, repairing damage not caused by Contractor, and removing or relocating such unidentified utility facilities, including equipment idled during such work. Contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delays which meet both of the following requirements (i) the delays occurred after Contractor gave City the written notice required by this section; and (ii) the delays were caused by the removal, protection, or relocation of such unidentified utility facilities. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prevent the City from seeking reimbursement of any such costs from the affected utility company. 4.7 Trenches or Excavations -Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 7104, if the work included in this Agreement requires excavations more than four (4) feet in depth, the following shall apply. a) Contractor shall promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify City, in writing, of any: (1) material that Contractor believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law; (2) Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site different from those indicated; or (3) unlcnown physical conditions at the site of any unusual natnre, different materially from those 5 ( ( ( ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the contract. b) City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do mate1ially so differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in Contractor's cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work shall issue a change order per Section 1. 8 of this Agreement. c) If a dispute arises between City and Contractor whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in Contractor's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by the contract, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under the contract. Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the contracting parties. 5. INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS 5 .1 Insurance -The Contractor shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance: (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 'i '-,',-,,,' ' '_. c,··:, /:.> :--;.<:,",_,;::· .<·,; iti' ,<::.;;; 1·ti•···:. , ~ii!ii~Bi~tts,}/Ci ., ~p~])iJJ_~~;sm~l.~;l}.pit~;per . .·· oqc:uri:en()e:a.nd/aggriJg~t~ · .• Broad-form commercial general liability, in a form at least as broad as ISO from #CG 00 01 11 88, including premises-operations, products I completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily injury. Contractual Liability Insurance; Products Liability Insurance. Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance (includes owned, non-owned, and hired automobile hazard). Professional Liability Insurance (providing for a one year discovery period). If the policy is wiitten as a "claims made" policy, the retroactivity date shall be prior to the start of the contract work. Consultant shall obtain and maintain said E&O liability insurance during the life of this Agreement and for three years after completion of the work hereunder. $1,000,000. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Agreement or shall be twice the required occuITence limit. $1,000,000 limit. $1,000,000 per occuJTence combined single limit combined single limits, per occUJTence for bodily injury and property damage. $1,000,000 limit. Workers Compensation/Employers' Liability Insurance Statutory $1,000,000 per as required by the State of California. Contractor agrees occurrence. 6 to waive, and to obtain endorsements from its workers' compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers' compensation insurance policy against the City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work perfmmed by Consultant for the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise under their workers' compensation insurance policies. CONDITIONS: a) Admitted. In accordance with Public Code Section 20170, the insurance or surety companies who provide or issue the policy shall have been admitted to do business in the State of California with a current Moody's credit rating of"A" minus or better. b) The policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain, with respect to: (i) Notice of Termination: "Said policy shall not terminate, be suspended, or voided, nor shall it be cancelled, nor the coverage or limits reduced, until thirty (30) days after written notice is given to City Engineer, City of West Covina, 1444 West Garvey Avenue South, West Covina, California 91790." (ii) Additional Insureds: "The City of West Covina and its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities perfmmed by or on behalf of the Contractor pursuant to its contract with the City; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; automobiles owned, leased, hired, or bonowed by the Contractor. (iii) Excess: "Any insurance maintained by the City of West Covina shall apply in excess of and not combined with insurance provided by this policy." c) Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City of West Covina, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers. d) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. e) Before starting work, Contractor shall deliver to the City insurance endorsements and certificates of insurance confnming the existence of the insurance required by this contract, and including the applicable clauses referenced above. f) Such endorsements shall be signed by an authorized representative of the insurance company and shall include the signatory's company affiliation and title. Should it be deemed necessary by the City, Contractor shall see that the City receives docun1entation, acceptable to the City, which sustains that the individual signing said endorsements is indeed authorized to do so by the insurance company. 7 ( ( ( g) If the Contractor fails to maintain the aforementioned insurance, or secure and maintain the aforementioned endorsement, the City may obtain such insurance, and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the agreement. Procuring of said insurance by the City is in addition to all other remedies the City may have. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to timely provide and maintain required insurance or policy endorsements, the City may order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which became due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. h) Nothing herein limits the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its sub-contractors' performance of the work covered under this agreement. i) Each contract between the Contractor and any sub-contractor shall require the sub-contractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Contractor is required to maintain pursuant to this Section 5 .1. 5.2 Indemnification -Contractor agrees to defend (with an attorney of City's choosing), indemnify, hold free and harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, at Contractor's sole expense, from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or other legal proceedings brought against the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees arising out of the performance of the Contractor, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the work m1dertalcen pursuant to this Agreement. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Contractor, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action, complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of the Contractor, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action, complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees based upon the work performed by the Contractor, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Contractor, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Contractor shall not be liable for the defense or indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other indemnity provisions contained in any other docmnent, which shall be of no force and effect. a) Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith; b) Contractor will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising or alleged to arise out of or in connection with Contractor's (or its agents', employees', sub-contractors', or invitees') negligent pe1formance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities hereunder; and Contractor agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees hannless therefrom; 8 c) If the City, its officers, agents or employees is/are made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Contractor for such damages or other claims arising or alleged to arise out of or in connection with the negligent perfo1mance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Contractor hereunder, Contractor shall pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys' fees for counsel acceptable to City. d) Contractor's duty to defend and indemnify as set out in this Section 5.2 shall include any claims, liabilities, obligations, losses, demands, actions, penalties, suits, costs, expenses or damages or injury to persons or property arising or alleged to arise from, in connection with, as a consequence of or pursuant to any state or federal law or regulation regarding hazardous substances, including but not limited to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA"), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA"), the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, the Hazardous Material Transportation Act, the Toxic Substances control Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the California Hazardous Substance Account Act, the California Hazardous Waste Control Law or the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, as any of those statutes may be amended from time to time. The Contractor's indemnification obligations pursuant to this Section 5 .2 shall survive the teffilination of this Agreement. Contractor shall require the same indemnification in favor of City from all sub-contractors. 5.3 Labor and Materials and Performance Bonds -Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall deliver to City a labor and materials bond and a performance bond each in the sum of the amount of this Agreement, in the forms provided by the City Clerk, which secures the faithful performance of this Agreement. The bonds shall contain the original notarized signature of an authorized officer of the surety and affixed thereto shall be a certified and crurent copy of his power of attorney. The bonds shall be Ullconditional and remain in force during the entire term of the Agreement and shall be released or exonerated only if the Contractor promptly and faithfully performs all terms and conditions of this Agreement. 5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer or Surety -Insurance or bonds required by this Agreement shall be satisfactmy only if issued by companies admitted to do business in California, rated with a current Moody's credit rating of "A" minus or better unless such requirements are waived by the City's Risk Manager in writing due to unique circumstances. If the Risk Manager of City ("Risk Manager") dete1mines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased risk of loss to the City, the Risk Manager may increase the minimrun limits of the insurance policies and the pe1formance bond required by this Section 5 upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager; provided that the Contractor may appeal such detennination to the City CoU11cil of City within ten (10) days of receipt of notice from the Risk Manager. 5.5 Substitution of Securities -Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 22300, substitution of eligible equivalent securities for any moneys withheld to ensure performance under the contract for the work to be performed will be permitted at the request and expense of the successful bidder. 9 ( ( ( 6. RECORDS AND REPORTS 6.1 Reports -Contractor shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the perfo1mance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Contractor hereby aclmowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Contractor agrees that if Contractor becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein, Contractor shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related. 6.2 Records -Contractor shall keep, and require sub-contractors to keep, such books and records (including but not limited to payroll records as required herein) as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during nmmal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and malce records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. 6.3 Ownership of Documents -All drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Contractor, its employees, sub-contractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Contractor shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Contractor may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Contractor shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All sub-contractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Contractor fails to secure such assignment, Contractor shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT 7 .1 California Law -This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to pe1f01mance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Snperior Comt of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contractor covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 10 7.2 Notice of Default and Cure Period -If either party fails to perfonn its obligations herennder, the nondefaulting party shall provide the defaulting party written notice of such default. The defaulting party shall have ten (10) days to cure the default; provided that, if the default is not reasonably susceptible to being cured within said ten (10) day period, the defaulting party shall have a reasonable time to cure the default, not to exceed a maximum of thirty (30) days, provided the defaulting party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and diligently prosecutes the cure to completion; provided further that if the default is an innnediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, the defaulting party shall take such innnediate action as may be necessary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the nondefaulting party may, in its sole and absolute discretion, grant a longer cure period. Should the defaulting party fail to cure the default within the time period provided in this Section, the nondefaulting party shall have the right, in addition to any other rights the nondefaulting party may have at law or in equity, to terminate this Agreement, and/or to call upon any completion or payment bond or other security for performance thereof. Compliance with the provisions of this Section 7.2 shall be a condition precedent to bringing any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured. 7.3. "Claims" by Contractor under Section 9204. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall be subject to all requirements of Public Contract Code section 9204 ("Section 9204") as it may be amended from time to time. The parties acknowledge that Section 9204 applies to certain requests by Contractor, such as certain requests for time extensions, certain requests for payments not covered by contract, and certain requests for payments of amonnts disputed by City. The parties :forther aclmowledge that Section 9204 establishes all of the following: (i) Contractor may submit a "claim" to the City, as that tenn is defined in section 9204; (ii) City has an initial 45 days to respond to review and respond to the claim to state "what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed"; (iii) Contractor must furnish reasonable documentation to support the claim; (iv) City has 60 days from its written determination to pay any nndisputed an10unt, and (v) specified procedures apply to resolve any amonnts in dispute. 7.4 Retention of Funds -Progress payments shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.2 of this agreement. In accordance with said section, City shall pay Contractor a sum based upon ninety five percent (95%) of the contract price apportionment. The remaining five percent ( 5%) thereof shall be retained as performance security to be paid to the Contractor within sixty (60) days after final acceptance of the work by the City Council, after Contractor shall have furnished City with a release of all undisputed contract amonnts if required by City. If there are any claims specifically excluded by Contractor from the operation of the release, the City may retain proceeds (per Public Contract Code 7107) ofup to 150% of the amonnt in dispute. City's failure to deduct or withhold shall not affect Contractor's obligations hereunder. To the extent consistent with Public Contract Code 22300, Contractor may request and City shall make payment of retentions earned directly to an escrow agent at the expense of Contractor, and may direct the investment of the payments into securities and Contractor shall receive the interest earned on the investments upon the same tenns provided for in Public Contract Code § 22300 for securities deposited by Contractor. Upon satisfactory completion of this Agreement, Contractor shall receive from the escrow agent all securities, interest, and payments received by the escrow agent from the owner. 11 ( ( 7.5 Waiver -No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a nondefaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. A party's consent to or approval of any act by the other party requiring the party's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party's consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.6 Rights and Remedies are Cnmulative -Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7. 7 Legal Action -In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or in equity, to cure, con-ect or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 7.8 Liquidated Damages -Since the deteffuination of actual damages for any delay in performance of this Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to deteffnine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, the Contractor and its sureties shall be liable for and shall pay to the City liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any service required hereunder, as specified in the Schedule of Performance and Liquidated Damages, and incorporated by reference (Exhibit "B"). In addition, liquidated damages may be assessed for failure to comply with the emergency call out requirements described in the scope of services. The City may withhold from any moneys payable on account of services performed by the Contractor any accrued liquidated damages. Contractor, its sureties, and City agree that the damages constitute a reasonable estimate of actual damage, and are not punitive. 7 .9 Termination for Default of Contractor -If termination is due to the failure of the Contractor to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, Contractor shall vacate any City owned property which Contractor is peffuitted to occupy hereunder and City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Contractor shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Contractor for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, NONDISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees -No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Contractor, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Contractor or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the te1ms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest -The Contractor warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 12 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination -Contractor covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or tln·ough them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, gender expression, marital status, national origin, disability, pregnancy, sexual orientation or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. To the extent required by law, contractor shall tal(e affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, gender expression, marital status, national origin, disability, pregnancy, sexual orientation or ancestry. 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notice -Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when served personally or deposited in the U.S. Mail, prepaid, first-class mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: To City: City of West Covina 1444 West Garvey Avenue South West Covina, California 91790 Attention: City Engineer To Contractor: PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. 5942 Acom Street Riverside, CA 92504 Attn: Elizabeth Mendoza de McRae 9 .2 Interpretation -The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 9.3 Integration; Amendment -It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing:. 9 .4 Severability -If one or more of the words, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections in this Agreement is declared unenforceable by a com! of competent jurisdiction, such unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining words, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are severable. Remaining enforceable provisions shall be interpreted to cany out the intent of the parties uuless an invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 9.5 Hiring of Undocumented Aliens Prohibited -Contractor shall not hire, employ, or allow any person to work under this Agreement lmless such person is properly documented and may legally work within the United States. 13 ( ( I ' 9.6 Unfair Business Practices Claims -Consistent with Public Contract Code section 7103.5, the contractor and all sub-contractors offer and agree to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action they may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Section 15) and under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services or materials pursuant to this Agreement. This assignment becomes effective when the City renders final payment to the Contractor without further aclmowledgment by the parties. 9. 7 Corporate Authority -The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. 9.8 Legal Responsibilities -The Contractor shall keep itself informed of City, State, and Federal laws, ordinances and regulations, which may in any manner affect the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws, ordinances and regulations. Neither the City, nor its officers, agents, assigns nor employees shall be liable at law or in equity as a result of the Contractor's failure to comply with this section. 9.9 Termination for Convenience ~ The City may terminate this Agreement without cause for convenience of the City upon giving contractor 3 0 days prior written notice of termination of the Agreement. Upon receipt of the notice of termination, the Contractor shall cease all further work pursuant to the Agreement. Upon such termination by the City, the Contractor shall not be entitled to any other remedies, claims, actions, profits, or damages except as provided in this paragraph. Upon the receipt of such notice of termination, Contractor shall be entitled to the following compensation: 1. The contract value of the work completed to and including the date of receipt of the notice of termination, less the amount of progress payments received by contractor. 2. Actual move-off costs including labor, rental fees, equipment transpmiation costs, the costs of maintaining on-site construction office for supervising the move-off. 3. The cost of materials custom-made for this Agreement which the Contractor cannot use in its nmmal course of business, and for which the City has not already paid. 4. Any costs shall not include any markups as might otherwise be allowed by any plans or specifications which were a part of the Agreement. The provisions of this paragraph shall supersede provisions of the Agreement and any provision of any plans, specification, addendums or other documents which is or may become a part of this Agreement. City and Contractor agree that the provisions of this paragraph are a substantive paii of this Agreement's consideration. 14 . IN WITNESS.WHEREOF, the pm:fies have executed-and e11tered into tltls /1.gree¢et1.t as .Qf lli,,e (f;,te.first'W1'itte11 ~1:ioV!i. · · ATIE.S'.):'; By: _________ ~--- . CltyCterk APPROVED As TO FORM: City Ati:omey Address: 5942 Acorn St Rlverside, CA 92504 15 '(:iTY OF WEST covmA, a mµpi9ipal ct:npqti,:tibp. By;--------~-----Public Works Dlteetor/City Engineer By: _____________ _ (I'tlntName) .Sig:11atu:re: __________ _ Tit1e: ____________ _ Address:. ___________ _ 2 4 1 3 5 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveW M er ce d Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveL a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 106 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River ATTACHMENT No. 1 District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,728 20,812 22,326 20,998 21,234 106,098 Deviation from ideal -492 -408 1,106 -222 14 1,598 % Deviation -2.32% -1.92% 5.21% -1.05% 0.07% 7.53% % Hisp 64% 58% 59% 45% 40% 53% % NH White 17% 15% 19% 14% 12% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 22% 17% 35% 42% 26% Total 15,285 15,480 16,704 16,169 16,385 80,023 % Hisp 60% 53% 54% 41% 36% 49% % NH White 21% 17% 22% 16% 14% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 18% 37% 44% 28% Total 14,198 13,650 15,286 13,582 14,241 70,957 % Hisp 58% 56% 53% 42% 37% 49% % NH White 21% 17% 21% 18% 14% 18% % NH Black 4% 5% 6% 7% 7% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.17% 21% 20% 33% 41% 27% Total 10,320 10,674 12,001 10,312 10,520 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 53% 49% 49% 43% 40% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 8% 13% 16% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 6% 7% 4% Total 2,501 2,726 3,226 2,766 2,724 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 44% 42% 39% 34% 34% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 1% 6% 7% 4% Total 6,202 6,257 7,270 6,326 6,332 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 49% 48% 42% 39% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 10% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 6% 7% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,762 21,449 23,053 20,841 20,989 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 26% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 53% 56% 55% 55% age60plus 17% 18% 21% 18% 21% 19% immigrants 33% 31% 30% 39% 42% 35% naturalized 58% 63% 67% 63% 69% 64% english 43% 47% 48% 39% 40% 44% spanish 40% 34% 34% 34% 26% 34% asian-lang 16% 18% 16% 25% 32% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 19% 18% 21% 21% 20% hs-grad 61% 59% 58% 51% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 17% 18% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 7% 8% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 35% 32% 34% 31% 34% employed 58% 55% 55% 58% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 14% 18% 11% 14% 14% income 25-50k 23% 21% 17% 21% 20% 20% income 50-75k 20% 21% 18% 19% 21% 20% income 75-200k 40% 41% 41% 45% 38% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 3% 5% 5% 6% 4% single family 77% 80% 80% 75% 76% 78% multi-family 23% 20% 20% 25% 24% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 33% 32% 29% 36% 38% 33% owned 67% 68% 71% 64% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 106 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 3 2 1 5 4 10 10 39 Francisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveS Azusa AveE Vine AveS Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 111 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,663 21,224 21,228 20,978 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal 443 4 8 -242 -215 685 % Deviation 2.09% 0.02% 0.04% -1.14% -1.01% 3.23% % Hisp 62% 60% 55% 48% 42% 53% % NH White 14% 20% 12% 22% 8% 15% % NH Black 4% 3% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 19% 15% 27% 25% 43% 26% Total 16,076 15,796 15,932 16,044 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 57% 55% 50% 43% 38% 49% % NH White 17% 24% 14% 26% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 3% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 21% 17% 30% 26% 45% 28% Total 14,819 14,349 13,403 14,667 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 57% 57% 48% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 18% 21% 17% 25% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 7% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.20% 17% 28% 26% 43% 27% Total 10,645 11,458 10,186 11,560 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 49% 38% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 10% 8% 10% 15% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 4% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,641 3,045 2,480 3,371 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 45% 40% 40% 30% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 7% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 4% 2% 10% 4% Total 6,288 7,007 6,036 7,262 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 50% 48% 37% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 8% 11% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 4% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,726 21,632 22,010 21,025 20,700 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 56% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 18% 18% 18% 23% 20% 19% immigrants 34% 27% 37% 33% 44% 35% naturalized 60% 68% 58% 70% 66% 64% english 42% 50% 41% 48% 38% 44% spanish 39% 35% 38% 29% 27% 34% asian-lang 18% 14% 20% 21% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 16% 23% 18% 23% 20% hs-grad 60% 61% 55% 54% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 18% 19% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 6% 5% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 39% 34% 34% 32% 32% 34% employed 57% 59% 55% 56% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 13% 16% 15% 15% 13% 14% income 25-50k 25% 18% 19% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 21% 17% 22% 17% 22% 20% income 75-200k 39% 45% 41% 43% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 3% 4% 3% 9% 4% 4% single family 78% 82% 76% 80% 73% 78% multi-family 22% 18% 24% 20% 27% 22% vacant 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 4% occupied 97% 97% 95% 95% 95% 96% rented 35% 27% 36% 27% 44% 33% owned 65% 73% 64% 73% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 111 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 2 1 3 4 5 10 10 39 Francisquito AveS W illow AveW M er ce d Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Ave E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 114 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,928 21,212 21,212 21,207 21,539 106,098 Deviation from ideal -292 -8 -8 -13 319 611 % Deviation -1.38% -0.04% -0.04% -0.06% 1.50% 2.88% % Hisp 64% 58% 58% 47% 40% 53% % NH White 15% 16% 16% 16% 12% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 17% 20% 20% 31% 41% 26% Total 15,448 15,905 15,904 16,157 16,609 80,023 % Hisp 59% 53% 53% 42% 36% 49% % NH White 19% 19% 19% 19% 14% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 18% 22% 22% 33% 43% 28% Total 14,034 14,452 14,406 13,640 14,425 70,957 % Hisp 57% 54% 53% 44% 37% 49% % NH White 20% 18% 19% 20% 15% 18% % NH Black 3% 5% 6% 6% 7% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.19% 22% 21% 29% 41% 27% Total 10,243 11,118 11,210 10,540 10,716 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 54% 48% 51% 42% 40% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 10% 9% 13% 16% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 3% 5% 7% 4% Total 2,469 2,933 2,874 2,865 2,802 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 46% 40% 41% 33% 34% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 5% 7% 4% Total 6,113 6,551 6,842 6,431 6,450 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 48% 50% 40% 39% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 10% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 5% 7% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,805 22,404 21,600 20,988 21,296 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 27% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 54% 55% 55% 55% 55% age60plus 18% 19% 19% 19% 22% 19% immigrants 33% 32% 29% 38% 42% 35% naturalized 58% 60% 67% 65% 69% 64% english 43% 45% 48% 42% 40% 44% spanish 40% 36% 35% 31% 26% 34% asian-lang 17% 17% 16% 25% 32% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 20% 18% 20% 21% 20% hs-grad 60% 59% 58% 52% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 16% 19% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 8% 8% 6% Child in Household child-under18 37% 36% 32% 34% 31% 34% employed 58% 55% 57% 57% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 17% 15% 12% 14% 14% income 25-50k 23% 20% 17% 21% 20% 20% income 50-75k 20% 20% 19% 18% 21% 20% income 75-200k 39% 40% 44% 43% 38% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 3% 4% 6% 6% 4% single family 78% 77% 83% 74% 76% 78% multi-family 22% 23% 17% 26% 24% 22% vacant 4% 3% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 97% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 33% 35% 27% 35% 38% 33% owned 67% 65% 73% 65% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 114 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 2 1 5 3 4 10 10 39 Fr an ci squito A veS W illow AveW W est Covina Pk wy S Azusa AveE Vine AveS Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a Pu en te R d Am a r R d E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 12, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 115 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River Public Plan 115 District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,752 20,787 21,688 21,866 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal -468 -433 468 646 -215 1,114 % Deviation -2.21% -2.04% 2.21% 3.04% -1.01% 5.25% % Hisp 63% 59% 59% 44% 42% 53% % NH White 19% 14% 19% 17% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 22% 17% 33% 43% 26% Total 15,390 15,463 16,238 16,757 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 58% 54% 55% 40% 38% 49% % NH White 22% 16% 22% 19% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 6% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 18% 35% 45% 28% Total 14,276 13,782 14,796 14,384 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 58% 55% 53% 41% 38% 49% % NH White 20% 17% 22% 21% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 6% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.17% 22% 19% 32% 43% 27% Total 10,723 10,551 11,744 10,831 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 49% 38% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 11% 9% 16% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 4% 9% 4% Total 2,731 2,691 3,138 2,978 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 42% 44% 39% 29% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 12% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 2% 4% 10% 4% Total 6,518 6,185 7,170 6,720 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 49% 36% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 12% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 4% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,062 21,482 22,144 21,705 20,700 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 56% 54% 54% 55% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 20% 20% 20% 19% immigrants 31% 33% 28% 39% 44% 35% naturalized 60% 61% 67% 66% 66% 64% english 45% 44% 50% 41% 38% 44% spanish 40% 36% 34% 31% 27% 34% asian-lang 14% 20% 14% 25% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"18% 21% 17% 21% 23% 20% hs-grad 63% 57% 59% 50% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 18% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 36% 32% 33% 32% 34% employed 60% 53% 55% 58% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% income 0-25k 15% 15% 16% 14% 13% 14% income 25-50k 21% 22% 19% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 17% 22% 20% 19% 22% 20% income 75-200k 43% 39% 41% 44% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 4% 7% 4% 4% single family 78% 81% 81% 76% 73% 78% multi-family 22% 19% 19% 24% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 32% 32% 28% 32% 44% 33% owned 68% 68% 72% 68% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 115 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 2 1 3 4 5 10 10 39 Franci squito A veS W illow AveW M erced Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Ave E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, October 8, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers 117 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,728 21,029 21,029 21,318 21,994 106,098 Deviation from ideal -492 -191 -191 98 774 1,266 % Deviation -2.32% -0.90% -0.90% 0.46% 3.65% 5.97% % Hisp 64% 58% 59% 45% 41% 53% % NH White 17% 14% 20% 13% 13% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 23% 16% 35% 40% 26% Total 15,285 15,641 15,858 16,277 16,962 80,023 % Hisp 60% 53% 54% 41% 37% 49% % NH White 21% 17% 24% 15% 14% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 15% 25% 17% 37% 42% 28% Total 14,198 13,865 14,510 13,431 14,952 70,957 % Hisp 58% 55% 54% 41% 38% 49% % NH White 21% 16% 23% 16% 15% 18% % NH Black 4% 5% 6% 7% 6% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.17% 24% 17% 35% 40% 27% Total 10,320 10,726 11,749 10,356 10,676 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 53% 49% 49% 42% 40% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 9% 13% 15% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 7% 7% 4% Total 2,501 2,744 3,237 2,697 2,764 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 44% 43% 39% 33% 34% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 1% 6% 7% 4% Total 6,202 6,285 7,283 6,164 6,453 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 49% 48% 41% 39% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 10% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 6% 7% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,762 21,913 21,559 21,040 21,819 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 26% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 54% 56% 55% 55% age60plus 17% 18% 20% 18% 22% 19% immigrants 33% 32% 27% 41% 41% 35% naturalized 58% 61% 69% 63% 69% 64% english 43% 46% 50% 38% 41% 44% spanish 40% 35% 34% 33% 26% 34% asian-lang 16% 18% 15% 27% 31% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 20% 17% 23% 21% 20% hs-grad 61% 59% 60% 49% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 17% 18% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 8% 8% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 35% 32% 34% 31% 34% employed 58% 55% 55% 58% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 5% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 15% 17% 13% 14% 14% income 25-50k 23% 20% 18% 20% 20% 20% income 50-75k 20% 21% 17% 19% 21% 20% income 75-200k 40% 41% 43% 43% 39% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 3% 4% 5% 6% 4% single family 77% 81% 82% 73% 76% 78% multi-family 23% 19% 18% 27% 24% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 33% 32% 26% 37% 38% 33% owned 67% 68% 74% 63% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 117 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 2 1 3 4 5 10 10 39 Franci squito A veS W illow AveW M erced Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Ave E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, October 27, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Makes a small change to Map #114 at the north end of districts 4 and 5. Otherwise identical to Map 114. Map layers 120 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,928 21,212 21,212 21,302 21,444 106,098 Deviation from ideal -292 -8 -8 82 224 516 % Deviation -1.38% -0.04% -0.04% 0.39% 1.06% 2.43% % Hisp 64% 58% 58% 47% 40% 53% % NH White 15% 16% 16% 16% 13% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 17% 20% 20% 31% 41% 26% Total 15,448 15,905 15,904 16,215 16,551 80,023 % Hisp 59% 53% 53% 42% 36% 49% % NH White 19% 19% 19% 19% 15% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 18% 22% 22% 33% 43% 28% Total 14,034 14,452 14,406 13,776 14,289 70,957 % Hisp 57% 54% 53% 44% 37% 49% % NH White 20% 18% 19% 20% 15% 18% % NH Black 3% 5% 6% 6% 7% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.19% 22% 21% 29% 41% 27% Total 10,243 11,118 11,210 10,532 10,724 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 54% 48% 51% 42% 39% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 10% 9% 13% 16% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 3% 6% 7% 4% Total 2,469 2,933 2,874 2,852 2,815 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 46% 40% 41% 34% 33% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 5% 7% 4% Total 6,113 6,551 6,842 6,383 6,498 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 48% 50% 40% 39% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 10% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 5% 7% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,805 22,404 21,600 21,084 21,200 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 27% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 54% 55% 55% 55% 55% age60plus 18% 19% 19% 19% 22% 19% immigrants 33% 32% 29% 38% 42% 35% naturalized 58% 60% 67% 65% 69% 64% english 43% 45% 48% 42% 40% 44% spanish 40% 36% 35% 31% 26% 34% asian-lang 17% 17% 16% 25% 32% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 20% 18% 20% 21% 20% hs-grad 60% 59% 58% 52% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 16% 19% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 8% 8% 6% Child in Household child-under18 37% 36% 32% 34% 31% 34% employed 58% 55% 57% 57% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 17% 15% 12% 14% 14% income 25-50k 23% 20% 17% 20% 20% 20% income 50-75k 20% 20% 19% 18% 21% 20% income 75-200k 39% 40% 44% 43% 38% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 3% 4% 6% 6% 4% single family 78% 77% 83% 74% 76% 78% multi-family 22% 23% 17% 26% 24% 22% vacant 4% 3% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 97% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 33% 35% 27% 35% 38% 33% owned 67% 65% 73% 65% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 120 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) ATTACHMENT No. 2 3 1 2 5 4 1010 39 Fr an cisquito Ave California AveW W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveW Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers NDC Green Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River ATTACHMENT NO. 1 District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,228 21,075 21,339 21,151 21,305 106,098 Deviation from ideal 8 -145 119 -69 85 264 % Deviation 0.04% -0.68% 0.56% -0.33% 0.40% 1.24% % Hisp 62% 60% 49% 54% 41% 53% % NH White 14% 17% 13% 21% 11% 15% % NH Black 4% 3% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 19% 18% 32% 20% 41% 26% Total 15,753 15,665 16,224 15,974 16,407 80,023 % Hisp 57% 55% 45% 49% 37% 49% % NH White 17% 21% 15% 25% 13% 18% % NH Black 4% 3% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 21% 19% 34% 21% 43% 28% Total 14,521 14,220 13,821 14,235 14,160 70,957 % Hisp 58% 56% 44% 50% 38% 49% % NH White 18% 20% 18% 22% 13% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 8% 4% 7% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.20% 20% 29% 23% 41% 27% Total 10,421 11,156 10,650 11,730 9,870 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 51% 46% 43% 42% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 10% 9% 11% 11% 15% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 6% 2% 8% 4% Total 2,569 2,847 2,720 3,373 2,433 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 45% 41% 37% 34% 37% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 10% 9% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 6% 1% 8% 4% Total 6,161 6,710 6,435 7,129 5,951 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 49% 46% 42% 41% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 8% 9% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 6% 1% 8% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,256 22,057 21,392 21,376 21,012 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 26% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 56% 53% 55% 55% age60plus 18% 18% 18% 22% 21% 19% immigrants 34% 31% 37% 32% 41% 35% naturalized 60% 60% 62% 69% 69% 64% english 42% 48% 40% 46% 42% 44% spanish 39% 35% 36% 32% 25% 34% asian-lang 18% 16% 22% 19% 31% 21% other lang 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 20% 21% 18% 21% 20% hs-grad 60% 59% 53% 56% 54% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 22% 20% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 9% 7% 6% Child in Household child-under18 39% 34% 33% 33% 32% 34% employed 57% 56% 58% 56% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% income 0-25k 13% 16% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 25% 18% 21% 17% 21% 20% income 50-75k 21% 21% 19% 16% 22% 20% income 75-200k 39% 42% 44% 42% 39% 41% income 200k-plus 3% 4% 3% 7% 5% 4% single family 78% 82% 76% 77% 76% 78% multi-family 22% 18% 24% 23% 24% 22% vacant 3% 3% 5% 5% 6% 4% occupied 97% 97% 95% 95% 94% 96% rented 35% 29% 35% 30% 38% 33% owned 65% 71% 65% 70% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - NDC Green Plan Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 1 2 3 4 5 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW M er ce d Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av eN Orange AveE Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers NDC Purple Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,229 20,992 21,150 21,396 21,331 106,098 Deviation from ideal 9 -228 -70 176 111 404 % Deviation 0.04% -1.07% -0.33% 0.83% 0.52% 1.90% % Hisp 64% 58% 59% 45% 41% 53% % NH White 18% 15% 18% 15% 11% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 15% 22% 17% 35% 41% 26% Total 15,742 15,526 15,840 16,540 16,375 80,023 % Hisp 59% 54% 54% 40% 37% 49% % NH White 21% 17% 22% 17% 13% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 5% 6% 4% % Asian-American 16% 23% 18% 37% 43% 28% Total 14,449 13,772 14,488 14,371 13,877 70,957 % Hisp 58% 57% 52% 41% 38% 49% % NH White 21% 16% 22% 20% 13% 18% % NH Black 3% 5% 6% 6% 7% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.18% 21% 20% 34% 41% 27% Total 10,792 10,666 11,435 11,050 9,884 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 53% 50% 48% 41% 42% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 10% 9% 14% 14% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 6% 8% 4% Total 2,682 2,702 3,054 2,983 2,522 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 44% 44% 37% 33% 36% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 12% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 1% 5% 8% 4% Total 6,518 6,221 6,939 6,806 5,902 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 50% 48% 39% 42% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 11% 11% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 6% 8% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,285 21,496 21,949 21,600 20,764 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 26% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 54% 55% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 18% 20% 20% 20% 19% immigrants 32% 30% 31% 40% 41% 35% naturalized 59% 65% 64% 62% 70% 64% english 43% 47% 47% 39% 41% 44% spanish 40% 33% 35% 35% 24% 34% asian-lang 15% 18% 17% 24% 32% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 18% 20% 22% 21% 20% hs-grad 61% 60% 58% 50% 54% 56% bachelor 14% 18% 17% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 6% 8% 7% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 35% 32% 33% 33% 34% employed 59% 56% 54% 57% 60% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 15% 18% 13% 13% 14% income 25-50k 23% 21% 18% 20% 21% 20% income 50-75k 19% 20% 20% 18% 22% 20% income 75-200k 41% 42% 40% 43% 39% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 3% 5% 6% 5% 4% single family 78% 79% 81% 74% 76% 78% multi-family 22% 21% 19% 26% 24% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 5% 6% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 95% 94% 96% rented 33% 32% 28% 36% 38% 33% owned 67% 68% 72% 64% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - NDC Purple Plan Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 5 1 2 3 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveE Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers NDC Yellow Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,179 21,296 21,397 21,153 21,073 106,098 Deviation from ideal -41 76 177 -67 -147 324 % Deviation -0.19% 0.36% 0.83% -0.32% -0.69% 1.53% % Hisp 61% 61% 59% 42% 44% 53% % NH White 14% 18% 20% 17% 8% 15% % NH Black 4% 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 20% 17% 16% 35% 42% 26% Total 15,739 15,809 16,039 16,321 16,115 80,023 % Hisp 57% 56% 54% 38% 39% 49% % NH White 16% 22% 23% 19% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 22% 18% 17% 37% 44% 28% Total 14,322 14,532 14,569 14,322 13,211 70,957 % Hisp 57% 56% 54% 39% 40% 49% % NH White 17% 21% 23% 20% 11% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 6% 6% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.22% 18% 18% 35% 41% 27% Total 10,533 11,149 11,694 11,055 9,396 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 51% 49% 37% 46% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 10% 10% 8% 16% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 5% 9% 4% Total 2,656 2,804 3,202 3,006 2,274 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 45% 41% 39% 29% 40% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 7% 7% 12% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 1% 4% 10% 4% Total 6,152 6,790 7,190 6,755 5,500 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 49% 48% 36% 45% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 7% 12% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 4% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,075 22,438 21,873 20,862 20,846 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 25% 25% 26% age20-60 55% 56% 54% 55% 56% 55% age60plus 18% 18% 20% 20% 19% 19% immigrants 34% 31% 27% 39% 44% 35% naturalized 60% 60% 69% 67% 65% 64% english 43% 47% 50% 41% 38% 44% spanish 38% 37% 35% 30% 28% 34% asian-lang 19% 15% 14% 27% 32% 21% other lang 1% 1% 2% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"21% 19% 16% 20% 24% 20% hs-grad 59% 60% 60% 51% 52% 56% bachelor 16% 15% 18% 25% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 36% 32% 33% 32% 34% employed 55% 58% 56% 59% 58% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 15% 17% 14% 12% 14% income 25-50k 24% 19% 19% 16% 25% 20% income 50-75k 21% 20% 17% 19% 21% 20% income 75-200k 39% 42% 43% 43% 38% 41% income 200k-plus 3% 4% 4% 7% 4% 4% single family 78% 82% 80% 76% 72% 78% multi-family 22% 18% 20% 24% 28% 22% vacant 3% 3% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 97% 97% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 35% 29% 28% 32% 44% 33% owned 65% 71% 72% 68% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - NDC Yellow Plan Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 3 1 2 5 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveW W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveS Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 101 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,048 21,442 21,184 21,419 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal -172 222 -36 199 -215 437 % Deviation -0.81% 1.05% -0.17% 0.94% -1.01% 2.06% % Hisp 63% 58% 53% 50% 42% 53% % NH White 18% 14% 15% 21% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 23% 26% 24% 43% 26% Total 15,586 16,001 15,987 16,274 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 59% 54% 48% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 22% 16% 18% 24% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 15% 25% 28% 25% 45% 28% Total 14,801 14,278 13,984 14,175 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 59% 54% 50% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 20% 17% 21% 23% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 7% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.17% 24% 23% 27% 43% 27% Total 10,512 11,208 10,687 11,442 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 48% 40% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 10% 14% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 5% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,596 2,923 2,733 3,285 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 42% 44% 37% 31% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 9% 10% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 4% 2% 10% 4% Total 6,265 6,705 6,553 7,070 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 47% 39% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 8% 11% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,213 22,450 21,251 21,479 20,700 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 56% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 18% 22% 20% 19% immigrants 32% 33% 32% 34% 44% 35% naturalized 59% 61% 65% 69% 66% 64% english 45% 44% 45% 46% 38% 44% spanish 39% 36% 36% 29% 27% 34% asian-lang 15% 19% 18% 22% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"19% 21% 18% 19% 23% 20% hs-grad 63% 58% 56% 54% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 21% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 36% 32% 33% 32% 34% employed 59% 53% 58% 56% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 15% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 22% 21% 20% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 18% 22% 19% 18% 22% 20% income 75-200k 42% 40% 45% 41% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 4% 8% 4% 4% single family 77% 83% 80% 76% 73% 78% multi-family 23% 17% 20% 24% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 5% 5% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 95% 95% 95% 96% rented 33% 31% 29% 31% 44% 33% owned 67% 69% 71% 69% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 101 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 5 1 2 3 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveE Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 102 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,844 22,637 20,914 20,748 19,955 106,098 Deviation from ideal 624 1,417 -306 -472 -1,265 2,682 % Deviation 2.94% 6.68% -1.44% -2.22% -5.96% 12.64% % Hisp 63% 59% 52% 48% 44% 53% % NH White 18% 14% 13% 22% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 22% 28% 25% 41% 26% Total 16,186 16,874 15,847 15,867 15,249 80,023 % Hisp 58% 54% 47% 43% 39% 49% % NH White 22% 17% 16% 26% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 30% 26% 44% 28% Total 14,427 15,444 14,042 14,549 12,495 70,957 % Hisp 58% 54% 48% 45% 40% 49% % NH White 19% 18% 17% 25% 11% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 7% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.18% 23% 28% 26% 41% 27% Total 11,182 11,461 10,771 11,420 8,993 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 48% 38% 46% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 11% 10% 15% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 5% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,849 2,912 2,662 3,325 2,194 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 43% 44% 39% 30% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 9% 11% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 5% 2% 9% 4% Total 6,759 6,710 6,439 7,185 5,293 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 48% 37% 45% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 12% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 5% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 23,174 23,550 20,847 20,790 19,732 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 25% 25% 26% age20-60 55% 54% 57% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 17% 23% 19% 19% immigrants 31% 33% 34% 33% 43% 35% naturalized 59% 60% 66% 70% 65% 64% english 45% 44% 43% 48% 39% 44% spanish 40% 36% 34% 29% 28% 34% asian-lang 14% 19% 21% 21% 31% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"19% 21% 18% 18% 24% 20% hs-grad 63% 57% 56% 54% 52% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 22% 22% 24% 20% graduatedegree 4% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 36% 33% 32% 32% 34% employed 60% 53% 59% 56% 58% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% income 0-25k 16% 15% 13% 15% 12% 14% income 25-50k 21% 21% 19% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 17% 22% 21% 17% 21% 20% income 75-200k 41% 39% 43% 43% 38% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 3% 9% 4% 4% single family 75% 82% 77% 80% 74% 78% multi-family 25% 18% 23% 20% 26% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 5% 6% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 95% 94% 96% rented 34% 32% 32% 27% 43% 33% owned 66% 68% 68% 73% 57% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 102 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 2 5 1 3 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW M er ce d Ave W W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d E Cameron AveN Orange AveE Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 103 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 25,108 10,570 29,118 21,347 19,955 106,098 Deviation from ideal 3,888 -10,650 7,898 127 -1,265 18,548 % Deviation 18.32% -50.19% 37.22% 0.60% -5.96% 87.41% % Hisp 63% 57% 57% 45% 44% 53% % NH White 18% 12% 15% 20% 8% 15% % NH Black 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 26% 23% 30% 41% 26% Total 18,595 7,906 21,939 16,334 15,249 80,023 % Hisp 58% 52% 52% 40% 39% 49% % NH White 22% 15% 18% 23% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 5% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 15% 27% 24% 31% 44% 28% Total 16,661 7,184 19,917 14,701 12,495 70,957 % Hisp 58% 55% 51% 43% 40% 49% % NH White 19% 16% 20% 22% 11% 18% % NH Black 5% 4% 6% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.18% 25% 23% 30% 41% 27% Total 12,579 5,566 15,123 11,566 8,993 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 49% 50% 38% 46% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 12% 10% 15% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 4% 4% 3% 9% 4% Total 3,141 1,495 3,795 3,317 2,194 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 42% 45% 40% 30% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 8% 11% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 3% 2% 9% 4% Total 7,544 3,362 8,996 7,191 5,293 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 49% 37% 45% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 9% 7% 12% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 3% 3% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 26,553 10,778 29,770 21,260 19,732 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 24% 25% 26% age20-60 54% 54% 56% 54% 56% 55% age60plus 18% 19% 18% 22% 19% 19% immigrants 31% 33% 31% 37% 43% 35% naturalized 59% 66% 62% 70% 65% 64% english 46% 42% 46% 43% 39% 44% spanish 39% 37% 35% 29% 28% 34% asian-lang 14% 20% 18% 26% 31% 21% other lang 1% 0% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"19% 20% 19% 18% 24% 20% hs-grad 61% 58% 57% 53% 52% 56% bachelor 15% 17% 18% 25% 24% 20% graduatedegree 5% 4% 6% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 37% 38% 33% 32% 32% 34% employed 59% 54% 56% 58% 58% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% income 0-25k 18% 14% 14% 13% 12% 14% income 25-50k 22% 23% 18% 17% 24% 20% income 50-75k 17% 19% 23% 18% 21% 20% income 75-200k 39% 43% 42% 44% 38% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 3% 9% 4% 4% single family 72% 87% 81% 79% 74% 78% multi-family 28% 13% 19% 21% 26% 22% vacant 5% 1% 4% 5% 6% 4% occupied 95% 99% 96% 95% 94% 96% rented 37% 28% 30% 28% 43% 33% owned 63% 72% 70% 72% 57% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 103 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 3 1 2 5 4 10 10 39 S W illow AveCalifornia AveW M er ce d Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveL a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron Ave S Hollenbeck StN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 104 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,139 20,744 20,660 22,156 21,399 106,098 Deviation from ideal -81 -476 -560 936 179 1,496 % Deviation -0.38% -2.24% -2.64% 4.41% 0.84% 7.05% % Hisp 60% 59% 54% 47% 46% 53% % NH White 14% 16% 15% 14% 17% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 21% 19% 25% 33% 31% 26% Total 15,769 15,504 15,471 16,954 16,325 80,023 % Hisp 56% 54% 49% 43% 42% 49% % NH White 17% 20% 18% 16% 19% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 22% 20% 27% 35% 32% 28% Total 14,174 14,607 12,862 15,110 14,204 70,957 % Hisp 55% 53% 53% 44% 42% 49% % NH White 17% 21% 20% 15% 20% 18% % NH Black 3% 7% 5% 6% 7% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.24% 20% 21% 35% 32% 27% Total 10,813 10,833 9,730 11,958 10,493 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 47% 46% 40% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 11% 9% 11% 11% 15% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 5% 6% 4% 4% Total 2,759 2,802 2,426 3,144 2,812 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 45% 40% 38% 39% 32% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 9% 10% 11% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 4% 6% 4% 4% Total 6,409 6,604 5,863 7,166 6,346 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 49% 45% 46% 38% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 8% 9% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 4% 6% 4% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,418 21,579 20,549 22,112 21,435 108,093 age0-19 28% 26% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 56% 56% 56% 53% 55% age60plus 18% 18% 18% 19% 23% 19% immigrants 34% 31% 33% 38% 37% 35% naturalized 60% 61% 65% 68% 66% 64% english 41% 47% 45% 40% 45% 44% spanish 40% 35% 35% 31% 28% 34% asian-lang 18% 17% 19% 27% 25% 21% other lang 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"21% 19% 18% 20% 21% 20% hs-grad 59% 59% 56% 55% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 17% 21% 24% 22% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 7% 9% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 34% 34% 34% 31% 34% employed 55% 56% 59% 59% 56% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% 4% income 0-25k 13% 14% 13% 13% 18% 14% income 25-50k 23% 19% 20% 21% 20% 20% income 50-75k 21% 21% 18% 18% 20% 20% income 75-200k 41% 41% 44% 43% 36% 41% income 200k-plus 2% 4% 4% 5% 6% 4% single family 82% 81% 77% 77% 73% 78% multi-family 18% 19% 23% 23% 27% 22% vacant 2% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% occupied 98% 96% 95% 96% 95% 96% rented 32% 29% 32% 36% 37% 33% owned 68% 71% 68% 64% 63% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 104 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 3 1 5 2 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveW Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveE Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 105 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,844 21,309 21,192 20,748 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal 624 89 -28 -472 -215 1,096 % Deviation 2.94% 0.42% -0.13% -2.22% -1.01% 5.16% % Hisp 63% 59% 54% 48% 42% 53% % NH White 18% 14% 14% 22% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 22% 26% 25% 43% 26% Total 16,186 15,884 15,911 15,867 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 58% 54% 50% 43% 38% 49% % NH White 22% 17% 16% 26% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 28% 26% 45% 28% Total 14,427 14,396 13,865 14,549 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 58% 55% 50% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 19% 19% 18% 25% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 6% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.18% 22% 25% 26% 43% 27% Total 11,182 10,790 10,457 11,420 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 49% 38% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 11% 10% 15% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 5% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,849 2,747 2,617 3,325 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 43% 44% 39% 30% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 9% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% Total 6,759 6,325 6,324 7,185 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 49% 37% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 12% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 23,174 22,024 21,406 20,790 20,700 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 54% 56% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 17% 23% 20% 19% immigrants 31% 33% 33% 33% 44% 35% naturalized 59% 61% 63% 70% 66% 64% english 45% 44% 43% 48% 38% 44% spanish 40% 36% 36% 29% 27% 34% asian-lang 14% 20% 19% 21% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"19% 21% 20% 18% 23% 20% hs-grad 63% 57% 55% 54% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 20% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 36% 33% 32% 32% 34% employed 60% 53% 58% 56% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 16% 15% 13% 15% 13% 14% income 25-50k 21% 22% 19% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 17% 22% 21% 17% 22% 20% income 75-200k 41% 39% 44% 43% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 3% 9% 4% 4% single family 75% 81% 79% 80% 73% 78% multi-family 25% 19% 21% 20% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 5% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 95% 95% 96% rented 34% 32% 30% 27% 44% 33% owned 66% 68% 70% 73% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 105 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 2 4 1 3 5 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveW M er ce d Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveL a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 106 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,728 20,812 22,326 20,998 21,234 106,098 Deviation from ideal -492 -408 1,106 -222 14 1,598 % Deviation -2.32% -1.92% 5.21% -1.05% 0.07% 7.53% % Hisp 64% 58% 59% 45% 40% 53% % NH White 17% 15% 19% 14% 12% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 22% 17% 35% 42% 26% Total 15,285 15,480 16,704 16,169 16,385 80,023 % Hisp 60% 53% 54% 41% 36% 49% % NH White 21% 17% 22% 16% 14% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 18% 37% 44% 28% Total 14,198 13,650 15,286 13,582 14,241 70,957 % Hisp 58% 56% 53% 42% 37% 49% % NH White 21% 17% 21% 18% 14% 18% % NH Black 4% 5% 6% 7% 7% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.17% 21% 20% 33% 41% 27% Total 10,320 10,674 12,001 10,312 10,520 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 53% 49% 49% 43% 40% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 8% 13% 16% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 6% 7% 4% Total 2,501 2,726 3,226 2,766 2,724 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 44% 42% 39% 34% 34% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 1% 6% 7% 4% Total 6,202 6,257 7,270 6,326 6,332 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 49% 48% 42% 39% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 10% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 6% 7% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,762 21,449 23,053 20,841 20,989 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 26% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 53% 56% 55% 55% age60plus 17% 18% 21% 18% 21% 19% immigrants 33% 31% 30% 39% 42% 35% naturalized 58% 63% 67% 63% 69% 64% english 43% 47% 48% 39% 40% 44% spanish 40% 34% 34% 34% 26% 34% asian-lang 16% 18% 16% 25% 32% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 19% 18% 21% 21% 20% hs-grad 61% 59% 58% 51% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 17% 18% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 7% 8% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 35% 32% 34% 31% 34% employed 58% 55% 55% 58% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 14% 18% 11% 14% 14% income 25-50k 23% 21% 17% 21% 20% 20% income 50-75k 20% 21% 18% 19% 21% 20% income 75-200k 40% 41% 41% 45% 38% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 3% 5% 5% 6% 4% single family 77% 80% 80% 75% 76% 78% multi-family 23% 20% 20% 25% 24% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 33% 32% 29% 36% 38% 33% owned 67% 68% 71% 64% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 106 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 5 1 2 4 3 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW M er ce d Ave W W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e S Barranca StN Orange AveE Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 107 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,525 21,184 20,876 21,221 22,292 106,098 Deviation from ideal -695 -36 -344 1 1,072 1,767 % Deviation -3.28% -0.17% -1.62% 0.00% 5.05% 8.33% % Hisp 62% 60% 52% 48% 45% 53% % NH White 19% 14% 22% 14% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 21% 21% 31% 41% 26% Total 15,231 15,709 15,785 16,250 17,048 80,023 % Hisp 57% 55% 47% 44% 40% 49% % NH White 22% 16% 26% 17% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 16% 23% 22% 32% 43% 28% Total 13,412 14,559 14,276 14,706 14,003 70,957 % Hisp 57% 57% 47% 45% 41% 49% % NH White 19% 18% 26% 17% 11% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 5% 7% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.19% 20% 22% 31% 40% 27% Total 10,554 10,563 11,567 10,955 10,188 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 51% 41% 45% 46% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 13% 12% 12% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 5% 9% 4% Total 2,713 2,622 3,218 2,892 2,497 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 42% 45% 32% 36% 40% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 10% 10% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 1% 5% 9% 4% Total 6,382 6,152 7,202 6,633 6,017 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 40% 44% 46% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 10% 9% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 5% 9% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,681 21,641 20,884 21,786 22,101 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 25% 25% 25% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 53% 57% 56% 55% age60plus 18% 19% 22% 18% 19% 19% immigrants 31% 32% 31% 37% 42% 35% naturalized 60% 62% 69% 65% 64% 64% english 46% 45% 49% 41% 38% 44% spanish 39% 35% 31% 33% 30% 34% asian-lang 14% 19% 18% 24% 30% 21% other lang 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"19% 20% 17% 21% 24% 20% hs-grad 62% 58% 55% 54% 52% 56% bachelor 15% 17% 21% 22% 24% 20% graduatedegree 5% 4% 10% 7% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 37% 36% 31% 34% 32% 34% employed 59% 54% 56% 57% 58% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% income 0-25k 17% 14% 15% 14% 12% 14% income 25-50k 21% 23% 18% 17% 24% 20% income 50-75k 16% 22% 18% 21% 21% 20% income 75-200k 42% 39% 42% 44% 39% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 7% 4% 4% 4% single family 75% 80% 79% 79% 76% 78% multi-family 25% 20% 21% 21% 24% 22% vacant 5% 2% 4% 5% 5% 4% occupied 95% 98% 96% 95% 95% 96% rented 34% 33% 28% 31% 41% 33% owned 66% 67% 72% 69% 59% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 107 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 1 5 2 4 3 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW M er ce d Ave W W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 108 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,483 21,948 21,820 20,842 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal -737 728 600 -378 -215 1,465 % Deviation -3.47% 3.43% 2.83% -1.78% -1.01% 6.90% % Hisp 62% 61% 54% 48% 42% 53% % NH White 15% 15% 22% 15% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 19% 19% 19% 30% 43% 26% Total 15,210 16,278 16,410 15,950 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 57% 56% 49% 43% 38% 49% % NH White 18% 18% 26% 18% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 6% 4% % Asian-American 20% 20% 20% 32% 45% 28% Total 13,426 14,663 15,208 13,942 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 56% 55% 52% 44% 38% 49% % NH White 17% 20% 22% 20% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 5% 4% 7% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.22% 19% 21% 29% 43% 27% Total 10,219 11,327 11,940 10,363 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 52% 42% 43% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 10% 9% 12% 12% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 5% 9% 4% Total 2,522 2,812 3,340 2,864 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 45% 42% 34% 34% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 9% 10% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 4% 10% 4% Total 6,101 6,704 7,335 6,452 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 51% 41% 42% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 10% 10% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 4% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,259 22,875 22,533 20,726 20,700 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 52% 57% 56% 55% age60plus 18% 18% 22% 18% 20% 19% immigrants 33% 30% 31% 36% 44% 35% naturalized 59% 62% 66% 66% 66% 64% english 43% 48% 47% 42% 38% 44% spanish 39% 35% 34% 33% 27% 34% asian-lang 17% 17% 18% 23% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 19% 18% 20% 23% 20% hs-grad 60% 59% 57% 54% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 17% 20% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 6% 8% 7% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 37% 35% 33% 33% 32% 34% employed 58% 55% 56% 58% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% income 0-25k 13% 14% 20% 12% 13% 14% income 25-50k 23% 20% 17% 18% 24% 20% income 50-75k 20% 24% 15% 19% 22% 20% income 75-200k 40% 39% 42% 46% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 3% 3% 6% 5% 4% 4% single family 80% 78% 77% 81% 73% 78% multi-family 20% 22% 23% 19% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 31% 34% 30% 28% 44% 33% owned 69% 66% 70% 72% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 108 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 2 1 5 3 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveE Vine AveS Lark Ellen AveL a P u e n te R d A m a r R d E Cameron Ave S Hollenbeck StN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 109 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,731 21,592 21,189 20,581 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal 511 372 -31 -639 -215 1,150 % Deviation 2.41% 1.75% -0.15% -3.01% -1.01% 5.42% % Hisp 64% 58% 58% 44% 42% 53% % NH White 18% 14% 20% 16% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 23% 17% 33% 43% 26% Total 15,950 16,152 16,013 15,733 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 59% 54% 53% 39% 38% 49% % NH White 21% 17% 24% 19% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 4% 5% 6% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 18% 35% 45% 28% Total 14,279 14,848 14,784 13,327 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 59% 55% 52% 41% 38% 49% % NH White 19% 18% 23% 21% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 6% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.18% 22% 18% 33% 43% 27% Total 10,693 11,221 11,825 10,110 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 53% 50% 48% 37% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 9% 16% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 5% 9% 4% Total 2,588 2,884 3,276 2,790 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 43% 44% 38% 29% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 12% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 1% 4% 10% 4% Total 6,362 6,662 7,342 6,227 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 50% 48% 36% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 12% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 4% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,647 22,611 21,771 20,364 20,700 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 54% 54% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 18% 20% 20% 20% 19% immigrants 31% 33% 28% 39% 44% 35% naturalized 60% 61% 68% 65% 66% 64% english 45% 44% 49% 41% 38% 44% spanish 38% 37% 35% 31% 27% 34% asian-lang 15% 18% 14% 26% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"18% 21% 17% 21% 23% 20% hs-grad 62% 58% 60% 50% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 18% 25% 25% 20% graduatedegree 5% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 37% 36% 32% 33% 32% 34% employed 60% 54% 55% 58% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% income 0-25k 13% 15% 17% 14% 13% 14% income 25-50k 23% 21% 19% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 18% 23% 17% 19% 22% 20% income 75-200k 42% 39% 43% 43% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 4% 7% 4% 4% single family 78% 81% 82% 75% 73% 78% multi-family 22% 19% 18% 25% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 32% 33% 26% 33% 44% 33% owned 68% 67% 74% 67% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 109 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 3 1 2 5 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveW W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveS Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 110 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,048 21,442 21,184 21,419 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal -172 222 -36 199 -215 437 % Deviation -0.81% 1.05% -0.17% 0.94% -1.01% 2.06% % Hisp 63% 58% 53% 50% 42% 53% % NH White 18% 14% 15% 21% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 23% 26% 24% 43% 26% Total 15,586 16,001 15,987 16,274 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 59% 54% 48% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 22% 16% 18% 24% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 15% 25% 28% 25% 45% 28% Total 14,801 14,278 13,984 14,175 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 59% 54% 50% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 20% 17% 21% 23% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 7% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.17% 24% 23% 27% 43% 27% Total 10,512 11,208 10,687 11,442 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 48% 40% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 10% 14% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 5% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,596 2,923 2,733 3,285 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 42% 44% 37% 31% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 9% 10% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 4% 2% 10% 4% Total 6,265 6,705 6,553 7,070 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 47% 39% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 8% 11% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,213 22,450 21,251 21,479 20,700 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 56% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 18% 22% 20% 19% immigrants 32% 33% 32% 34% 44% 35% naturalized 59% 61% 65% 69% 66% 64% english 45% 44% 45% 46% 38% 44% spanish 39% 36% 36% 29% 27% 34% asian-lang 15% 19% 18% 22% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"19% 21% 18% 19% 23% 20% hs-grad 63% 58% 56% 54% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 21% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 36% 32% 33% 32% 34% employed 59% 53% 58% 56% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 15% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 22% 21% 20% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 18% 22% 19% 18% 22% 20% income 75-200k 42% 40% 45% 41% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 4% 8% 4% 4% single family 77% 83% 80% 76% 73% 78% multi-family 23% 17% 20% 24% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 5% 5% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 95% 95% 95% 96% rented 33% 31% 29% 31% 44% 33% owned 67% 69% 71% 69% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 110 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 3 2 1 5 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveS Azusa AveE Vine AveS Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 111 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,663 21,224 21,228 20,978 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal 443 4 8 -242 -215 685 % Deviation 2.09% 0.02% 0.04% -1.14% -1.01% 3.23% % Hisp 62% 60% 55% 48% 42% 53% % NH White 14% 20% 12% 22% 8% 15% % NH Black 4% 3% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 19% 15% 27% 25% 43% 26% Total 16,076 15,796 15,932 16,044 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 57% 55% 50% 43% 38% 49% % NH White 17% 24% 14% 26% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 3% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 21% 17% 30% 26% 45% 28% Total 14,819 14,349 13,403 14,667 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 57% 57% 48% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 18% 21% 17% 25% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 7% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.20% 17% 28% 26% 43% 27% Total 10,645 11,458 10,186 11,560 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 49% 38% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 10% 8% 10% 15% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 4% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,641 3,045 2,480 3,371 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 45% 40% 40% 30% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 7% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 4% 2% 10% 4% Total 6,288 7,007 6,036 7,262 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 50% 48% 37% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 8% 11% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 4% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,726 21,632 22,010 21,025 20,700 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 56% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 18% 18% 18% 23% 20% 19% immigrants 34% 27% 37% 33% 44% 35% naturalized 60% 68% 58% 70% 66% 64% english 42% 50% 41% 48% 38% 44% spanish 39% 35% 38% 29% 27% 34% asian-lang 18% 14% 20% 21% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 16% 23% 18% 23% 20% hs-grad 60% 61% 55% 54% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 18% 19% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 6% 5% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 39% 34% 34% 32% 32% 34% employed 57% 59% 55% 56% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 13% 16% 15% 15% 13% 14% income 25-50k 25% 18% 19% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 21% 17% 22% 17% 22% 20% income 75-200k 39% 45% 41% 43% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 3% 4% 3% 9% 4% 4% single family 78% 82% 76% 80% 73% 78% multi-family 22% 18% 24% 20% 27% 22% vacant 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 4% occupied 97% 97% 95% 95% 95% 96% rented 35% 27% 36% 27% 44% 33% owned 65% 73% 64% 73% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 111 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 3 2 1 5 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW M er ce d Ave S Azusa AveE Vine AveS Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 112 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,836 21,676 21,603 20,978 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal -384 456 383 -242 -215 840 % Deviation -1.81% 2.15% 1.80% -1.14% -1.01% 3.96% % Hisp 62% 60% 54% 48% 42% 53% % NH White 15% 20% 12% 22% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 3% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 18% 16% 28% 25% 43% 26% Total 15,357 16,109 16,338 16,044 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 57% 55% 50% 43% 38% 49% % NH White 18% 23% 14% 26% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 3% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 20% 17% 30% 26% 45% 28% Total 13,710 14,577 14,284 14,667 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 57% 57% 49% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 19% 21% 16% 25% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 7% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.21% 16% 27% 26% 43% 27% Total 10,190 11,445 10,654 11,560 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 51% 49% 38% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 10% 8% 10% 15% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 3% 2% 5% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,446 2,975 2,745 3,371 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 45% 40% 41% 30% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 7% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 4% 2% 10% 4% Total 5,988 6,948 6,395 7,262 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 49% 49% 37% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 8% 11% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 4% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,855 21,988 22,525 21,025 20,700 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 56% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 18% 18% 17% 23% 20% 19% immigrants 34% 27% 37% 33% 44% 35% naturalized 57% 68% 60% 70% 66% 64% english 43% 50% 40% 48% 38% 44% spanish 39% 35% 39% 29% 27% 34% asian-lang 17% 14% 21% 21% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"21% 16% 22% 18% 23% 20% hs-grad 60% 61% 55% 54% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 18% 19% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 6% 5% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 34% 35% 32% 32% 34% employed 56% 60% 56% 56% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 13% 16% 14% 15% 13% 14% income 25-50k 25% 18% 19% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 23% 17% 20% 17% 22% 20% income 75-200k 36% 45% 44% 43% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 3% 4% 3% 9% 4% 4% single family 73% 81% 81% 80% 73% 78% multi-family 27% 19% 19% 20% 27% 22% vacant 4% 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% occupied 96% 97% 96% 95% 95% 96% rented 38% 28% 32% 27% 44% 33% owned 62% 72% 68% 73% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 112 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 3 1 2 5 4 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveCalifornia AveW M er ce d Ave W W est C o vina P k w y S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d E Cameron AveN Orange AveE Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 113 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,165 21,578 21,257 21,093 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal -55 358 37 -127 -215 573 % Deviation -0.26% 1.69% 0.17% -0.60% -1.01% 2.70% % Hisp 63% 59% 53% 49% 42% 53% % NH White 18% 14% 14% 21% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 22% 26% 24% 43% 26% Total 15,668 15,986 16,119 16,075 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 58% 55% 49% 44% 38% 49% % NH White 22% 16% 17% 25% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 16% 23% 28% 25% 45% 28% Total 14,392 14,362 14,168 14,315 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 58% 56% 49% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 19% 18% 19% 24% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 6% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.18% 21% 25% 25% 43% 27% Total 10,989 10,736 10,784 11,340 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 51% 48% 39% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 10% 14% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 4% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,787 2,648 2,839 3,263 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 43% 45% 38% 30% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% Total 6,682 6,216 6,637 7,057 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 50% 47% 38% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 8% 11% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,414 21,785 22,056 21,137 20,700 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 56% 54% 56% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 18% 22% 20% 19% immigrants 31% 31% 35% 34% 44% 35% naturalized 60% 64% 61% 69% 66% 64% english 45% 46% 42% 47% 38% 44% spanish 39% 34% 38% 29% 27% 34% asian-lang 14% 19% 19% 21% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"18% 19% 22% 19% 23% 20% hs-grad 63% 58% 55% 53% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 17% 19% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 5% 5% 6% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 35% 33% 32% 32% 34% employed 60% 55% 56% 56% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 14% 14% 17% 13% 14% income 25-50k 21% 23% 18% 17% 24% 20% income 50-75k 17% 22% 20% 18% 22% 20% income 75-200k 44% 39% 45% 40% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 3% 8% 4% 4% single family 78% 79% 82% 76% 73% 78% multi-family 22% 21% 18% 24% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 5% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 95% 95% 96% rented 32% 33% 29% 30% 44% 33% owned 68% 67% 71% 70% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 113 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 2 1 3 4 5 10 10 39 Fr an cisquito AveS W illow AveW M er ce d Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a P u e n te R d A m a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 9, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 114 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,928 21,212 21,212 21,207 21,539 106,098 Deviation from ideal -292 -8 -8 -13 319 611 % Deviation -1.38% -0.04% -0.04% -0.06% 1.50% 2.88% % Hisp 64% 58% 58% 47% 40% 53% % NH White 15% 16% 16% 16% 12% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 17% 20% 20% 31% 41% 26% Total 15,448 15,905 15,904 16,157 16,609 80,023 % Hisp 59% 53% 53% 42% 36% 49% % NH White 19% 19% 19% 19% 14% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 18% 22% 22% 33% 43% 28% Total 14,034 14,452 14,406 13,640 14,425 70,957 % Hisp 57% 54% 53% 44% 37% 49% % NH White 20% 18% 19% 20% 15% 18% % NH Black 3% 5% 6% 6% 7% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.19% 22% 21% 29% 41% 27% Total 10,243 11,118 11,210 10,540 10,716 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 54% 48% 51% 42% 40% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 10% 9% 13% 16% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 3% 5% 7% 4% Total 2,469 2,933 2,874 2,865 2,802 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 46% 40% 41% 33% 34% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 5% 7% 4% Total 6,113 6,551 6,842 6,431 6,450 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 48% 50% 40% 39% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 10% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 5% 7% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,805 22,404 21,600 20,988 21,296 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 27% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 54% 55% 55% 55% 55% age60plus 18% 19% 19% 19% 22% 19% immigrants 33% 32% 29% 38% 42% 35% naturalized 58% 60% 67% 65% 69% 64% english 43% 45% 48% 42% 40% 44% spanish 40% 36% 35% 31% 26% 34% asian-lang 17% 17% 16% 25% 32% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 20% 18% 20% 21% 20% hs-grad 60% 59% 58% 52% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 16% 19% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 8% 8% 6% Child in Household child-under18 37% 36% 32% 34% 31% 34% employed 58% 55% 57% 57% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 17% 15% 12% 14% 14% income 25-50k 23% 20% 17% 21% 20% 20% income 50-75k 20% 20% 19% 18% 21% 20% income 75-200k 39% 40% 44% 43% 38% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 3% 4% 6% 6% 4% single family 78% 77% 83% 74% 76% 78% multi-family 22% 23% 17% 26% 24% 22% vacant 4% 3% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 97% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 33% 35% 27% 35% 38% 33% owned 67% 65% 73% 65% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 114 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 2 1 5 3 4 10 10 39 Fr an ci squito A veS W illow AveW W est Covina Pk wy S Azusa AveE Vine AveS Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a Pu en te R d Am a r R d E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 12, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 115 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River Public Plan 115 District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,752 20,787 21,688 21,866 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal -468 -433 468 646 -215 1,114 % Deviation -2.21% -2.04% 2.21% 3.04% -1.01% 5.25% % Hisp 63% 59% 59% 44% 42% 53% % NH White 19% 14% 19% 17% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 22% 17% 33% 43% 26% Total 15,390 15,463 16,238 16,757 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 58% 54% 55% 40% 38% 49% % NH White 22% 16% 22% 19% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 6% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 18% 35% 45% 28% Total 14,276 13,782 14,796 14,384 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 58% 55% 53% 41% 38% 49% % NH White 20% 17% 22% 21% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 6% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.17% 22% 19% 32% 43% 27% Total 10,723 10,551 11,744 10,831 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 49% 38% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 11% 9% 16% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 4% 9% 4% Total 2,731 2,691 3,138 2,978 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 42% 44% 39% 29% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 12% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 2% 4% 10% 4% Total 6,518 6,185 7,170 6,720 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 49% 36% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 12% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 4% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,062 21,482 22,144 21,705 20,700 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 56% 54% 54% 55% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 20% 20% 20% 19% immigrants 31% 33% 28% 39% 44% 35% naturalized 60% 61% 67% 66% 66% 64% english 45% 44% 50% 41% 38% 44% spanish 40% 36% 34% 31% 27% 34% asian-lang 14% 20% 14% 25% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"18% 21% 17% 21% 23% 20% hs-grad 63% 57% 59% 50% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 18% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 36% 32% 33% 32% 34% employed 60% 53% 55% 58% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% income 0-25k 15% 15% 16% 14% 13% 14% income 25-50k 21% 22% 19% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 17% 22% 20% 19% 22% 20% income 75-200k 43% 39% 41% 44% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 4% 7% 4% 4% single family 78% 81% 81% 76% 73% 78% multi-family 22% 19% 19% 24% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 32% 32% 28% 32% 44% 33% owned 68% 68% 72% 68% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 115 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 3 1 5 2 4 10 10 39 Fr an ci squito A veS W illow AveCalifornia AveW W est Covina Pk wy S Azusa AveW Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a Pu en te R d Am a r R d E Cameron AveN Orange AveE Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, September 12, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers Plan 116 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River Public Plan 116 District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,614 21,309 21,192 20,978 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal 394 89 -28 -242 -215 636 % Deviation 1.86% 0.42% -0.13% -1.14% -1.01% 3.00% % Hisp 63% 59% 54% 48% 42% 53% % NH White 18% 14% 14% 22% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 22% 26% 25% 43% 26% Total 16,009 15,884 15,911 16,044 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 58% 54% 50% 43% 38% 49% % NH White 22% 17% 16% 26% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 28% 26% 45% 28% Total 14,309 14,396 13,865 14,667 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 58% 55% 50% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 19% 19% 18% 25% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 6% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.18% 22% 25% 26% 43% 27% Total 11,042 10,790 10,457 11,560 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 49% 38% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 8% 11% 10% 15% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 5% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,803 2,747 2,617 3,371 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 43% 44% 39% 30% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 9% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% Total 6,682 6,325 6,324 7,262 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 49% 37% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 11% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,938 22,024 21,406 21,025 20,700 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 54% 56% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 17% 23% 20% 19% immigrants 31% 33% 33% 33% 44% 35% naturalized 59% 61% 63% 70% 66% 64% english 45% 44% 43% 48% 38% 44% spanish 40% 36% 36% 29% 27% 34% asian-lang 14% 20% 19% 21% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"19% 21% 20% 18% 23% 20% hs-grad 63% 57% 55% 54% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 20% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 36% 33% 32% 32% 34% employed 60% 53% 58% 56% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 16% 15% 13% 15% 13% 14% income 25-50k 21% 22% 19% 16% 24% 20% income 50-75k 17% 22% 21% 17% 22% 20% income 75-200k 42% 39% 44% 43% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 3% 9% 4% 4% single family 75% 81% 79% 80% 73% 78% multi-family 25% 19% 21% 20% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 5% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 95% 95% 96% rented 34% 32% 30% 27% 44% 33% owned 66% 68% 70% 73% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 116 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 2 1 3 4 5 10 10 39 Fr an ci squito A veS W illow AveW M erced Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a Pu en te R d Am a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, October 8, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers 117 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,728 21,029 21,029 21,318 21,994 106,098 Deviation from ideal -492 -191 -191 98 774 1,266 % Deviation -2.32% -0.90% -0.90% 0.46% 3.65% 5.97% % Hisp 64% 58% 59% 45% 41% 53% % NH White 17% 14% 20% 13% 13% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 23% 16% 35% 40% 26% Total 15,285 15,641 15,858 16,277 16,962 80,023 % Hisp 60% 53% 54% 41% 37% 49% % NH White 21% 17% 24% 15% 14% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 15% 25% 17% 37% 42% 28% Total 14,198 13,865 14,510 13,431 14,952 70,957 % Hisp 58% 55% 54% 41% 38% 49% % NH White 21% 16% 23% 16% 15% 18% % NH Black 4% 5% 6% 7% 6% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.17% 24% 17% 35% 40% 27% Total 10,320 10,726 11,749 10,356 10,676 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 53% 49% 49% 42% 40% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 9% 13% 15% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 7% 7% 4% Total 2,501 2,744 3,237 2,697 2,764 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 44% 43% 39% 33% 34% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 1% 6% 7% 4% Total 6,202 6,285 7,283 6,164 6,453 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 51% 49% 48% 41% 39% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 10% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 6% 7% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,762 21,913 21,559 21,040 21,819 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 26% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 54% 56% 55% 55% age60plus 17% 18% 20% 18% 22% 19% immigrants 33% 32% 27% 41% 41% 35% naturalized 58% 61% 69% 63% 69% 64% english 43% 46% 50% 38% 41% 44% spanish 40% 35% 34% 33% 26% 34% asian-lang 16% 18% 15% 27% 31% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 20% 17% 23% 21% 20% hs-grad 61% 59% 60% 49% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 17% 18% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 8% 8% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 35% 32% 34% 31% 34% employed 58% 55% 55% 58% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 5% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 15% 17% 13% 14% 14% income 25-50k 23% 20% 18% 20% 20% 20% income 50-75k 20% 21% 17% 19% 21% 20% income 75-200k 40% 41% 43% 43% 39% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 3% 4% 5% 6% 4% single family 77% 81% 82% 73% 76% 78% multi-family 23% 19% 18% 27% 24% 22% vacant 4% 2% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 33% 32% 26% 37% 38% 33% owned 67% 68% 74% 63% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 117 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 3 1 5 2 4 10 10 39 Fr an ci squito A veS W illow AveW W est Covina Pk wy S Azusa AveW Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a Pu en te R d Am a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveE Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, October 8, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers 118 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,230 22,637 19,864 22,362 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal -990 1,417 -1,356 1,142 -215 2,773 % Deviation -4.67% 6.68% -6.39% 5.38% -1.01% 13.07% % Hisp 63% 59% 54% 49% 42% 53% % NH White 19% 14% 14% 22% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 22% 26% 24% 43% 26% Total 14,969 16,874 14,921 17,084 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 58% 54% 49% 44% 38% 49% % NH White 22% 17% 16% 25% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 28% 25% 45% 28% Total 13,662 15,444 12,818 15,314 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 59% 54% 50% 45% 38% 49% % NH White 19% 18% 19% 24% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 7% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.18% 23% 24% 25% 43% 27% Total 10,487 11,461 9,786 12,115 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 49% 39% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 9% 14% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 5% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,676 2,912 2,451 3,498 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 43% 44% 39% 30% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% Total 6,380 6,710 5,938 7,564 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 49% 37% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 11% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 4% 2% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,520 23,550 19,879 22,443 20,700 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 56% 54% 56% 53% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 17% 23% 20% 19% immigrants 31% 33% 33% 33% 44% 35% naturalized 60% 60% 64% 69% 66% 64% english 45% 44% 44% 47% 38% 44% spanish 40% 36% 36% 29% 27% 34% asian-lang 14% 19% 19% 21% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"18% 21% 19% 18% 23% 20% hs-grad 63% 57% 55% 54% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 16% 21% 22% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 38% 36% 32% 32% 32% 34% employed 60% 53% 58% 55% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 15% 15% 13% 17% 13% 14% income 25-50k 21% 21% 19% 17% 24% 20% income 50-75k 17% 22% 21% 17% 22% 20% income 75-200k 44% 39% 44% 41% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 3% 8% 4% 4% single family 78% 82% 79% 77% 73% 78% multi-family 22% 18% 21% 23% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 5% 5% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 95% 95% 95% 96% rented 32% 32% 30% 29% 44% 33% owned 68% 68% 70% 71% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 118 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 2 1 5 3 4 10 10 39 Fr an ci squito A veS W illow AveCalifornia AveW W est Covina Pk wy S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a Pu en te R d Am a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, October 8, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Map layers 119 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 21,382 21,414 21,325 20,972 21,005 106,098 Deviation from ideal 162 194 105 -248 -215 442 % Deviation 0.76% 0.91% 0.49% -1.17% -1.01% 2.08% % Hisp 63% 58% 49% 54% 42% 53% % NH White 18% 14% 14% 21% 8% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 14% 23% 30% 20% 43% 26% Total 15,882 15,909 16,250 15,807 16,175 80,023 % Hisp 58% 53% 44% 49% 38% 49% % NH White 22% 17% 17% 25% 10% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 6% 4% % Asian-American 15% 24% 32% 21% 45% 28% Total 14,549 14,228 14,273 14,188 13,719 70,957 % Hisp 58% 55% 46% 49% 38% 49% % NH White 20% 18% 18% 24% 10% 18% % NH Black 4% 4% 6% 5% 8% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.17% 22% 30% 22% 43% 27% Total 10,783 11,046 10,514 11,506 9,978 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 50% 44% 43% 45% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 11% 12% 12% 13% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 5% 2% 9% 4% Total 2,656 2,811 2,878 3,194 2,405 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 42% 43% 35% 34% 39% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 10% 9% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 3% 4% 1% 10% 4% Total 6,398 6,536 6,530 7,128 5,794 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 50% 43% 42% 44% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 9% 10% 10% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 4% 1% 10% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 22,396 22,072 21,542 21,383 20,700 108,093 age0-19 28% 27% 26% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 55% 57% 52% 56% 55% age60plus 17% 19% 18% 23% 20% 19% immigrants 31% 32% 36% 31% 44% 35% naturalized 59% 62% 65% 67% 66% 64% english 45% 45% 42% 48% 38% 44% spanish 39% 36% 33% 33% 27% 34% asian-lang 15% 19% 23% 17% 33% 21% other lang 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"18% 20% 21% 18% 23% 20% hs-grad 62% 58% 54% 56% 53% 56% bachelor 15% 17% 22% 20% 25% 20% graduatedegree 5% 5% 7% 9% 6% 6% Child in Household child-under18 37% 36% 34% 31% 32% 34% employed 60% 54% 57% 55% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 3% 5% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 14% 13% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 22% 22% 17% 18% 24% 20% income 50-75k 18% 22% 20% 16% 22% 20% income 75-200k 42% 39% 46% 41% 37% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 2% 5% 7% 4% 4% single family 77% 80% 81% 77% 73% 78% multi-family 23% 20% 19% 23% 27% 22% vacant 4% 2% 6% 4% 5% 4% occupied 96% 98% 94% 96% 95% 96% rented 32% 33% 29% 30% 44% 33% owned 68% 67% 71% 70% 56% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 119 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop 2 1 3 4 5 10 10 39 Fr an ci squito A veS W illow AveW M erced Ave S Azusa AveE Vine Ave W Workman Ave S Lark Ellen AveE Cortez St L a Pu en te R d Am a r R d S Citrus Av e E Cameron AveN Orange AveW Puente Ave E Rowland Ave Map prepared by National Demographics, October 27, 2017 City of West Covina Districting 2017 Makes a small change to Map #114 at the north end of districts 4 and 5. Otherwise identical to Map 114. Map layers 120 Water Area Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Pipeline/Power Line Railroad River District 1 2345Total Total Pop 20,928 21,212 21,212 21,302 21,444 106,098 Deviation from ideal -292 -8 -8 82 224 516 % Deviation -1.38% -0.04% -0.04% 0.39% 1.06% 2.43% % Hisp 64% 58% 58% 47% 40% 53% % NH White 15% 16% 16% 16% 13% 15% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-American 17% 20% 20% 31% 41% 26% Total 15,448 15,905 15,904 16,215 16,551 80,023 % Hisp 59% 53% 53% 42% 36% 49% % NH White 19% 19% 19% 19% 15% 18% % NH Black 3% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% % Asian-American 18% 22% 22% 33% 43% 28% Total 14,034 14,452 14,406 13,776 14,289 70,957 % Hisp 57% 54% 53% 44% 37% 49% % NH White 20% 18% 19% 20% 15% 18% % NH Black 3% 5% 6% 6% 7% 5% % Asian/Pac.Isl.19% 22% 21% 29% 41% 27% Total 10,243 11,118 11,210 10,532 10,724 53,827 %Spanish-Surnamed 54% 48% 51% 42% 39% 47% % Asian-Surnamed 9% 10% 9% 13% 16% 11% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 3% 6% 7% 4% Total 2,469 2,933 2,874 2,852 2,815 13,942 %Spanish-Surnamed 46% 40% 41% 34% 33% 39% % Asian-Surnamed 6% 8% 8% 11% 13% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 5% 7% 4% Total 6,113 6,551 6,842 6,383 6,498 32,387 %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 48% 50% 40% 39% 46% % Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 7% 10% 12% 9% % Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 5% 7% 4% ACS Pop. Est.Total 21,805 22,404 21,600 21,084 21,200 108,093 age0-19 27% 27% 27% 25% 24% 26% age20-60 55% 54% 55% 55% 55% 55% age60plus 18% 19% 19% 19% 22% 19% immigrants 33% 32% 29% 38% 42% 35% naturalized 58% 60% 67% 65% 69% 64% english 43% 45% 48% 42% 40% 44% spanish 40% 36% 35% 31% 26% 34% asian-lang 17% 17% 16% 25% 32% 21% other lang 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"20% 20% 18% 20% 21% 20% hs-grad 60% 59% 58% 52% 53% 56% bachelor 14% 16% 19% 24% 25% 20% graduatedegree 4% 5% 7% 8% 8% 6% Child in Household child-under18 37% 36% 32% 34% 31% 34% employed 58% 55% 57% 57% 59% 57% Commute on Public Transit 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% income 0-25k 14% 17% 15% 12% 14% 14% income 25-50k 23% 20% 17% 20% 20% 20% income 50-75k 20% 20% 19% 18% 21% 20% income 75-200k 39% 40% 44% 43% 38% 41% income 200k-plus 4% 3% 4% 6% 6% 4% single family 78% 77% 83% 74% 76% 78% multi-family 22% 23% 17% 26% 24% 22% vacant 4% 3% 4% 6% 5% 4% occupied 96% 97% 96% 94% 95% 96% rented 33% 35% 27% 35% 38% 33% owned 67% 65% 73% 65% 62% 67% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Work (percent of pop age 16+) Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of West Covina - Public Plan 120 Language spoken at home Voting Age Pop Housing Stats Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. Citizen Voting Age Pop Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Age Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2328 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING BY- DISTRICT ELECTIONS PER CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE II DIVISION 1 SECTION 2.20 OF THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE THAT PROVIDES FOR CITY COUNCIL ELECTIONS BY DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the City of West Covina supports the full participation of all residents in electing members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2310 on January 17, 2017, to change from an at-large election system to a by-district election system, with five districts, the boundaries of which are to be determined in accordance with state law; and WHEREAS, at regular meetings of the City Council of the City of West Covina held on July 18 and August 15, 2017, respectively, pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10010(a)( 1), the City Council held public hearings where the public was invited to provide input regarding the composition of the City's voting districts before any draft maps were drawn; and WHEREAS, thereafter, at regular meetings of the City Council of the City of West Covina held on September 19 and November 7, 2017, respectively, pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10010(a)( 2), the City Council held public hearings where the public was invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps that had been released at least seven ( 7) days before each meeting, as well as the proposed sequence of elections; WHEREAS, the purpose of this Ordinance is to enact an ordinance designating the boundaries for the five single-member districts as reflected in Exhibit A to this Ordinance and the sequence of district elections. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City of West Covina’s five (5) Council districts shall have the boundaries more particularly depicted in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 3: The members of the Council of the first, third and fifth Council districts shall be elected commencing in the year 2018 to the Council seats then open, and in each fourth year thereafter. The members of the Council of the second and fourth Council districts shall be elected commencing in the year 2020 to the Council seats then open, and in each fourth year thereafter. Ordinance No. 2328 – By District Elections Map SECTION 4: This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final passage and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, the City Clerk of the City of West Covina shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and to its approval by the Mayor and City Council and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this ___ day of ____, 2017. _______________________________ Corey Warshaw, Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK I, _________________________, CITY CLERK of the City of West Covina, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ____th day of ______________, 2017. That thereafter said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ___ day of _________, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _______________________________ City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kimberly Hall Barlow City Attorney Ordinance No. 2328 – By District Elections Map EXHIBIT “A” First District [written description of boundaries to be added] Second District [written description of boundaries to be added] Third District [written description of boundaries to be added] Fourth District [written description of boundaries to be added] Fifth District [written description of boundaries to be added] These district boundaries are depicted on a boundary map attached hereto. These boundaries will remain in effect until amended by ordinance as provided in section 2-20 of Article II, Division 1, of the West Covina Municipal Code. ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Comments from Community Meetings and Those Submitted to Staff Regarding Draft City Council District Maps Date: October 7, 2017 Location: Cameron Community Center Presenters: Laura Minnich, Deputy City Manager, City of West Covina Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney, Jones & Mayer Doug Johnson, National Demographics Corporation Council in Attendance: Councilmember James Toma, Councilman Lloyd Johnson (No Quorum) Community Feedback at Meeting: • Sykes question about residences – postponed, demographic information on back • Ones that make sense, compact, use freeway as major divide; neighborhoods kept together, not vertical, compactness. Hills, freeway, sunset, Azusa major divided. • Shewmaker drew 114, tweaks he would make – divide south into more than one district. North south gives more influence he thinks. North low income, high density housing, his map gives 3 members to the north. Says it’s also nice that it gives other minority members of our community more of a say in selecting council members. He compares his map to Solis district, which is Glendora to Hawthorne. • Chris Miller – not going to get multi-use housing or bike lanes in south; those are issues for the north side. Supports Shemaker’s notion of having multiple members have stake in each area, Puente, accident, just getting out of his house. • Ann Grivich – more services, more public safety, increase revenue; her plan is the only plan that gives part of West Covina Corridor to every district. North south plan, crosses neighborhoods with idea of uniting, not dividing community. Gerrymandering: state law actually allows it, even encourages it, non-partisan elections • North south; people of both side of freeway face same issues, same with Azusa. • Dave Stewart - No matter which map is chosen, not a perfect map. Ann’s map is nice, but why can’t we take business area out of the mix and have it represented by all council members. • Alfred Williams – he likes 105 and other compact maps such as that. Vertical maps, first saw thought it might be good idea, but you are separating neighborhoods. Why not do east – west? • Jerri Potras - favors vertical maps • Preserve neighborhoods. • Robert Torres – Map 101. He drew 4 maps, most similar, downtown district, his concern, also wanting compactness, keeping communities together. Also drew 111. Also drew 112, all downtown in one district. 113 is another variation of that. Thinks each district should share border with at least 2 other districts. One reason he doesn’t like the vertical maps. He thinks 114 number 4 and 5 are not good; completely different communities north and south of BKK. Focus on whether communities are being represented. • Elsie Messman - vertical is great, get everyone involved, give more diversity, everyone can get to know each other. Go all the way up to 10, at least it’s even. Chance to get the know each other • Jim Grivich - talks about Los Angeles districts – because each councilman only cared about one place. Horrible idea to do districts. • Steve Bennett – opposed to districts. North/South is best he says; want to get rid of gerrymandering. 45-year resident, lives north of the freeway. Expense of doing every 10 years. Economics, sore losers want compact neighborhoods; give us choice of candidates, separate to give multiple voices by area. • No Name Provided - almost 30-year resident; close to Queen of Valley, now on east of Azusa, south hills. Kids grow up here; West Covina only city we know. Teach, get involved, this is home, each care about our neighborhood; shop in City to help bring our budget from red to black. We want all of the City to be taken care of. Waste all this money for nothing. Because some community wants swimming pool. Wants the vertical, just temporary she hopes. • Armando Sanchez – We are here to support the community. • John Shewmaker - defends map again. Date: October 12, 2017 Location: West Covina Senior Center Presenters: Laura Minnich, Deputy City Manager, City of West Covina Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney, Jones & Mayer Shalice Tilton, National Demographics Corporation Council in Attendance: Mayor Corey Warshaw, Councilmember James Toma, Councilman Lloyd Johnson (Quorum reached at 7:20pm) Community Feedback at Meeting: • Ann Grivich had submitted a legend with her map, 117, however not included on the public maps printed. • Bill Robinson – don’t favor any of the maps, don’t have enough info. Have big effect on governance going forward. Doesn’t allow residents to know which of maps may pit incumbents against each other. • Ethnicity factors on each of maps. Would like to see data on spreadsheet. Object to not being able to see where incumbents are. City Attorney explained that those addresses are public however Council is not to take incumbency or candidate sheets into account. • Likes Legends. Looks for balance. • Sykes – Map 105 – read CVRA, focus on compactness, important to him. This map gives you five fire stations, thinking toward future, when we think of the future, when we have our accounts in order, perhaps we could have 5 police substations, police have to go in first in these mass shootings, etc. Picture of future that could come from compactness. Fire stations already embedded. Police Department is isolated in downtown area. More community oriented, can work toward that in future. • Jim Harris – first time. Original resident, 1956. Like’s district rep, likes the groupings, helps him to have them in his hand. Could we have those at the meeting, sees the vertical thinking, piggyback on Sykes; blocking, sense of community, walking the district, if we are doing 5, not so inclined to be from one end of city to other, more for neighborhood. #101, 110, 105 he put a star on. Really likes that one. Geography oriented. Makes a lot of sense, tweaked with necessary demographic and population, votes in person, likes to know who his neighbors are – can’t really walk all the way up and down. More block centered. Understands business core, but thinks more about neighborhood. • Gail, 117, feels it’s more inclusive, lives north of freeway, since 1960, loves how they did economic center in each one. Brings us closer than what it is now. Had all this mess, new freeway called Workman Avenue will go through 3 different districts – empowers them more. • Gloria Gandera – agrees with Gail. Plan 117, north and south, get to know everyone. Likes it because it has five – economic stability of each of them is splendid. • Torres - regarding Green, Purple and Yellow – all three consultant plans, issue – proponent of compact, understands north south has some attractiveness, but he prefers the local community, local more important than the economics or politics of having vertical approach. All are vertical, don’t share multiple boundaries, he would disqualify. Should have boundaries with 2 or 3 other districts. He submitted 101, he thinks is acceptable. Divided up downtown, Dist. 1 Queen of the Valley, Civic Center, Dist. 2, Mall, Dist. 3 Lakes, Dist. 4 has Eastland, Dist. 5 has Heights and BKK. 105 is acceptable. Would still want to see downtown shared. 106 is vertical, doesn’t find it acceptable. 108 okay, but thinks it’s too elongated in Dist. 3, 111 is also shared downtown, different orientation. Acceptable, similar business breakdown. 112 has all downtown in 1 district, if that is community of interest, that’s option as well. 112 not as much business in 3. Last – vertical has good aspects but if I lived on Valley Blvd., district representative lives north of 10, interaction, but not really likely to be part of – harder for him or her to interact with southern area. Benefit of vertical doesn’t seem high enough to justify lack of representation. • Jerri Potras – lives north of freeway, family lives north of freeway, regularly shop in southern part of city, not huge city, small, friends live throughout the city, communicates through phone and email, not big issue because not big city; concern that they become so focused on their own neighborhood that they forget commercial areas that keep city vital. Freeway corridor is known in SGV as critical corridor that other people envy. If you don’t have people representing that area, we will be sorry in the future – thanks Shewmaker for coming up with vertical idea. Some of us really concerned. North of freeway concerned that we are in HUD designated areas. If only have 1 or 2 down the road, all the HUD will get in our area, intent of law is to spread these area throughout city. Wants all council members to look at city as a whole. Encourage council to hold other hearings to discuss these vertical maps and all of these ideas could be put into a map and be seriously considered. • Shewmaker – idea of north south was to bring city together. Talks about Napolitano, represents this area, lives in Whittier, has power to represent different people all over, but nobody in West Covina does. Because live north of freeway, completely incapable of understanding south or vice versa is false idea. Approach is to get people in place who will represent the city. Any time you go to districts – that Balkanize the city, if we had it before, BKK would still be open. North side would not care because they would have wanted to retain the income. Where something can be shoved into certain area, people don’t care. Gym at Cortez, people around Shadow Oak Park had a fit, and they didn’t want it. But if we had districts, it would have gone in Shadow Oak. This helps break up some of that, he’s giving rationale for why he selected. Focus on corridor but forgetting that there could be development at BKK, have down there, 4th most congested intersection in county, development at BKK, we could all say we don’t care, let them have more traffic, they already have much. • JD – viewed last meeting on You Tube, couldn’t hear audio. 3 maps submitted by NDC, what criteria was used to draw these maps – just population and contiguity? Schools, main arteries, shopping corridors? Why these 3 versus others submitted in this package. NDC response, took into consideration totality of comments we received while maintaining population balance and contiguous, get a map which isn’t, but if we are able to draw a map with those ideas in mind, we do, sometimes combined. I wish I would have included auto mall, hear it early on, can consider that. Later in the process, we make note of them and draw maps that seem to meet the needs of the community. Why not legend or footnote to indicate what considerations are – can’t tell why he would favor one over the other. Heard reasons given as to why one format may be better than other, but nothing on map that would show me the advantage from one to the other. Questions what NDC’s criteria is. • Grivich, this process is more of a collaboration, Shewmaker came up with vertical, 2 councilmen representing every party, then Mr. Kaufman talked about commercial areas, and then where Ann came in, each councilman should represent 1 of the 5 major economic areas in the city. 5 has 2. Others all have one. Problem is when you have to have hearings on final map. • Kaufman, 115 is his map, since doing it and listening to input from other people, thrust was dividing commercial areas into districts, had he to do it over again. Would have divided Eastland the way he did the Plaza. Sorry that whole BKK area, giant plot could not be divided. Would try to get everything, using vertical approach, contrived to bring some of that north of the freeway, but other 4 should be, 80% of council would have interest in what goes on along the corridor and along each side of it. Impressed by amount of information and difficult decisions, think what they need to do is not to pick, take best from various maps and create their own that takes input of population. • Sandra Delahuse – in minority, these maps are Greek to me, no legend to tell me what’s where, just getting it in hand, something specific to help me and others like me to get a real idea of where things are located to make intelligent decision about which maps would be good for West Covina. Concerned about commercial, don’t want one or 2 to contain all of our commercial areas, in some of the areas, landlocked, almost no development, where the schools are, how they will be going. Community isn’t aware that we are sitting in this building. Volunteer at Queen of the Valley, talks to people to tell them, city not doing a good job of getting word out. Discover article, but nobody read it. We have signs for Halloween, like to see something across a major street, should be filled with people, average people need to be part of this as well. • Shalice Tilton (NDC) – shows interactive map, satellite view, overlay with a map, shows 117 overlay. School district boundaries are shown. Shows topography. Some ability on interactive map to use whatever imagery is better for you. • Steve Bennett – 45 year resident, opposed to districts. In favor of north/south, agree with economic interest, piece of economic corridor on 10, division in city, area of city unrepresented, according to him, those areas of city don’t think they are unrepresented. Fire Districts? Part of maps. Speak to council members, email, call, he’s never had problem speaking with council member, anyone can, there isn’t going to be a disconnect. #105 looks eerily familiar to 2009 campaign that lost 2-1 against it. 2009 vote says automatically should not be used. Eliminated right off the bat. North/south, Shewmaker’s map closest to what he likes, but not perfect. He would make a few changes to it, will work with John to prepare a new one. This isn’t good. • Ceasar Cervantes – supports districts from day 1. Thinks it’s necessary, supports 105, agreed with Sykes. If it is about money? All money from city goes into one account. Important to have unity and ensure that each district has a fire dept., and police substations to help people represent, north south defeats purpose. What happened in 2009 not important. It’s 2017 and he supports one that looks like 105. • Laura Minnich reminds those in attendance not to assume change to fire districts or police areas as a result of this process. Nothing to do with school districts. • Repeat – Bennett – any of the fire districts basis for maps drawing. He doesn’t want to have council men think they have their own police department or fire department, station, district. We can barely afford police and fire now. • No name provided - CVRA – ignorance. Would it be unwise or wise legally, abide by FVRA and CVRA. • JD - asked about Johnson map, 118. • Potras - understand why you include all those districts, wish it wasn’t included. City doesn’t run all those things. Administrative districts would like to see as complete as united as possible what to see city as united as possible. Keeps coming up – concept of gerrymandering. Got it and didn’t ask for it. They are wrestling with a difficult issue. She doesn’t want to consider where they live in drawing the boundaries. We need to look at the best interests of the City. We don’t know who will run. Are we creating districts for people who might want to run? Trust the council. Has a hard task. Consider districts best for City. Communication. – we communicate with each other through email, facebook, neighbors keeping neighbors informed. She prints out and gives out to people who are not on-line. City can only do so much. • Glenn Kennedy – 55 years can council do this in a backroom? Response from City Attorney: No they cannot draw maps or make tweaks in closed session, or make selection in closed session. Comments received via the online form at www.westcovina.org/districts • I think that map 117 is the best so far. It gives each district a slice of the vital I-10 corridor. Our economic health depends on enhancing our commercial entities and the I-10 corridor has the most prospects for growth. Plan 117 also has districts that cut across neighborhoods, so the council members will have an incentive to work hard for more than one area of the city. • Plan 101, 105, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113. 115, 116, NDC Yellow - Neither the north nor the south part of the city should be isolated. This map isolates the south part of the city. • Plan 116 - Districts are relatively compact for all areas of the City. • Plan 117 - Vertical approach giving five elected responsibility for north of the freeway , the 10 freeway economic areas, and with some boundaries touching two and/or three other districts. Comments received via email: • Teresa Cozad - I prefer a plan that provides for vertical districting because that gives a more diversified district which allows for more equal representation. I live north of the 10 freeway and more often that not our interests are not taken into account. A great example of this is the plan to move the fire station to Palm View Park. It’s about money not what is best for the residents. • Fred Sykes - The CVRA indicates how to draft a Voting Districts Map. Long and uncondensed is not in the description provided by the CVRA. I am concerned when I see a Voting Districts Map that appears to ignore the CVRA with Voting Districts that are far from compact! Maps that are submitted with Voting Districts that extend long distances from North to South or East to West, a large area with barren landscape and no residents as a connector, have a gaping space in a district, a freeway and or major City Street that separates a large portion of the population in a district are problematic. This type of Voting Districts Map is failing to have communities of like interest, a common school district, shared community Parks, similar social activities and the same social status represented in the same Voting District. The City indicates that the process is: The process will have both a technical and community input component completed in tandem to define and create the best recommendation for creating the district boundaries. The technical process requires the formation of nearly equal districts based on population (ideally within 5 percent from smallest to largest). However, other factors also play a major role including: topography, geography, cohesiveness, contiguity, compactness, integrity of territory, communities of interest and significant and sensitive land uses. Comments received via hand delivered letter: • Jerri Potras – I am not a supporter of council districts but do recognize that the CVRA lawsuit filed by plaintiffs Armando Sanchez, Juan Reinoso, and Alfred Williams and subsequent settlement agreement accepted by city council, are requiring the change in how councilmembers are elected. I appreciate the opportunity to provide input in to how council district boundaries should be drawn. 1. Preferred Public Plan Map 117: Public Plan 117 extends all council boundaries north of the freeway and recognizes the importance of the IO freeway corridor as an important aspect of the city's economic engine. These elements are important because cities consist of much more than houses, schools, utility companies, and the like. Indeed, the economic well-being of a city has a direct impact on the quality of our quality of life. Consequently, I strongly believe that (A) no area of the city should be isolated from any other area as occurs with compact districts; and (B) council districts that share several "neighborhoods" and business district areas will encourage councilmembers to work together on citywide projects and discourage internal politics as councilmembers that so often occur when councilmembers compete, e.g., not in my district or my district first, etc. In short, a vertical plan best unites the city. Public Plan 117 best supports that goal. 2. Concern with Public Plans 101,105,108,110,113,116,118, and 119: These plans reduce north of the freeway representation to two elected councilmembers. By doing so, these plans have the potential for setting up permanent majority-minority council dynamics with the potential of concentrating HUD and other low-income projects north of the freeway instead dispersing them throughout the city as is expected to occur; limiting park and other recreational activities; delaying routine maintenance while council majority areas receive priority, etc. In additional, these maps also isolate the southern portion of the city. Thus, these maps increase the potential for balkanization and/or creating conditions where a future barrio/ghetto situation could arise. Such situations must be avoided. West CovinaCouncil Districting 2017Justin Levitt, Vice-PresidentDouglas Johnson, PresidentNational Demographics Corporation (NDC)October 12, 2017ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Summary of MapsOctober 12, 20172Nineteen maps submitted by the publicNDC added three maps to the mixTwenty two total mapsFive maps are either not population balanced or are not contiguousTwo maps (101 and 110) turned out to be duplicatesSixteen maps meet legal requirementsInteractive Map Maps that are not Population Balanced or not Contiguous3Interactive Map 4Maps 101 and 110 are the same map, submitted by two different people.Northern District 1 / Central District 3 Maps (Part A)Interactive Map 5Northern District 1/ Central District 3 Maps(Part B)Interactive Map 6Northwestern District 1 MapsInteractive Map Vertical Maps7Interactive Map What do you like or dislike about the various maps?What possible changes would improve the maps?Public DiscussionOctober 12, 20178Interactive Map ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2328 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, IMPLEMENTING BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS PER CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE II DIVISION 1 SECTION 2.20 OF THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE THAT PROVIDES FOR CITY COUNCIL ELECTIONS BY DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the City of West Covina supports the full participation of all residents in electing members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2310 on January 17, 2017, to change from an at-large election system to a by-district election system, with five districts, the boundaries of which are to be determined in accordance with state law; and WHEREAS, at regular meetings of the City Council of the City of West Covina held on July 18 and August 15, 2017, respectively, pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10010(a)( 1), the City Council held public hearings where the public was invited to provide input regarding the composition of the City's voting districts before any draft maps were drawn; and WHEREAS, thereafter, at regular meetings of the City Council of the City of West Covina held on September 19, November 7, and November 14 2017, respectively, pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10010(a)( 2), the City Council held public hearings where the public was invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps that had been released at least seven (7) days before each meeting, as well as the proposed sequence of elections; WHEREAS, the purpose of this Ordinance is to enact an ordinance designating the boundaries for the five single-member districts as reflected in Exhibit A to this Ordinance and the sequence of district elections. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City of West Covina’s five (5) Council districts shall have the boundaries more particularly depicted in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 3: The members of the Council of the first, third and fifth Council districts shall be elected commencing in the year 2018 to the Council seats then open, and in each fourth year thereafter. The members of the Council of the second and fourth Council districts shall be elected commencing in the year 2020 to the Council seats then open, and in each fourth year thereafter. Ordinance No. 2328 – By District Elections Map SECTION 4: This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final passage and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, the City Clerk of the City of West Covina shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and to its approval by the Mayor and City Council and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this ___ day of ____, 2017. _______________________________ Corey Warshaw, Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK I, _________________________, CITY CLERK of the City of West Covina, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ____th day of ______________, 2017. That thereafter said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ___ day of _________, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _______________________________ City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kimberly Hall Barlow City Attorney Ordinance No. 2328 – By District Elections Map EXHIBIT “A” First District [written description of boundaries to be added] Second District [written description of boundaries to be added] Third District [written description of boundaries to be added] Fourth District [written description of boundaries to be added] Fifth District [written description of boundaries to be added] These district boundaries are depicted on a boundary map attached hereto. These boundaries will remain in effect until amended by ordinance as provided in section 2-20 of Article II, Division 1, of the West Covina Municipal Code.