The URL can be used to link to this page

12-20-2011 - General Plan Amendment No. 11-01Zone Change No. 11 - Item 18 Attach 1 (2).pdf Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Office Condominium Project at 1607 W.Covina Parkway Prepared for: City of West Covina Planning Department 1444 West Garvey Avenue West Covina, CA 91793 Attn: Fabiola Wong, Senior Planner Prepared by: Hogle-Ireland, Inc. 2860 Michelle Drive, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92606 Attn: Christopher Brown, Senior Environmental Planner September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 3 Table of Contents Section 1: Project Description.................................................................................5 1.1 – Project Title............................................................................................ 5 1.2 – Lead Agency Name and Address ................................................................ 5 1.3 – Contact Person and Phone Number ............................................................ 5 1.4 – Project Location ...................................................................................... 5 1.5 – Project Sponsor’s Name and Address.......................................................... 5 1.6 – General Plan Land Use Designation ............................................................ 5 1.7 – Zoning District ........................................................................................ 5 1.8 – Project Description .................................................................................. 5 1.9 – Background Information........................................................................... 6 1.10 – Surrounding Land Uses ............................................................................ 6 1.11 – Environmental Setting.............................................................................. 6 1.12 – Required Approvals.................................................................................. 7 1.13 – Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required ....................................... 7 Section 2: Determination ......................................................................................27 2.1 – Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .................................................27 2.2 – Determination........................................................................................27 Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts...................................................29 3.1 – Aesthetics .............................................................................................29 3.2 – Agriculture and Forest Resources..............................................................33 3.3 – Air Quality.............................................................................................35 3.4 – Biological Resources ...............................................................................43 3.5 – Cultural Resources..................................................................................47 3.6 – Geology and Soils...................................................................................49 3.7 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......................................................................53 3.8 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials..............................................................57 3.9 – Hydrology and Water Quality....................................................................61 3.10 – Land Use and Planning ............................................................................67 3.11 – Mineral Resources ..................................................................................69 3.12 – Noise....................................................................................................71 3.13 – Population and Housing...........................................................................75 3.14 – Public Services.......................................................................................77 3.15 – Recreation.............................................................................................79 3.16 – Transportation and Traffic........................................................................81 3.17 – Utilities and Service Systems ...................................................................85 3.18 – Mandatory Findings of Significance............................................................89 Section 4: References............................................................................................93 4.1 – List of Preparers.....................................................................................93 4.2 – Persons and Organizations Consulted ........................................................93 4.3 – Bibliography ..........................................................................................93 Section 5: Summary of Mitigation Measures..........................................................97 Appendix Materials..............................................................................................101 A: Criteria Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculations B: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment C: Hydrology Study D: Preliminary Geotechnical Report E: Traffic Study Table of Contents 4 September 2011 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Project Location.................................................................................... 9 Exhibit 2 Photographic Survey Orientation Map .....................................................11 Exhibit 3 Site Photos 1-6 ...................................................................................13 Exhibit 4 Site Photos 7-13..................................................................................15 Exhibit 5 Site Plan.............................................................................................17 Exhibit 6 Primary Landscape Plan........................................................................19 Exhibit 7 Library Landscape Plan.........................................................................21 Exhibit 8 North and West Building Elevations ........................................................23 Exhibit 9 South and East Building Elevations.........................................................25 List of Tables Table 3.3.1 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status .............................................37 Table 3.3.2 Tentative Construction Schedule.........................................................37 Table 3.3.3 Unmitigated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day)................38 Table 3.3.4 Mitigated Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) ..................................39 Table 3.3.5 Long-Term Daily Emissions (lbs/day) ..................................................40 Table 3.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory..................................................54 Table 3.18.1 Other Planned/Pending Projects for Cumulative Impact Consideration ....90 City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 5 Section 1: Project Description 1.1 – Project Title Parkway Corporate Center 1.2 – Lead Agency Name and Address City of West Covina Planning Department 1444 West Garvey Avenue West Covina, California 91793 1.3 – Contact Person and Phone Number Fabiola Wong, Senior Planner 626-939-8422 1.4 – Project Location Immediately east of intersection of West Covina Parkway and Garvey Avenue 1607 West Covina Parkway West Covina, CA 91793 (see Exhibit 1, Project Location) 1.5 – Project Sponsor’s Name and Address Parkway Investment, LLC 17528 East Rowland Street Industry, California 91748 1.6 – General Plan Land Use Designation Public Facilities 1.7 – Zoning District Public Buildings 1.8 – Project Description The proposed project includes demolition of existing paved surface parking areas and landscaped ground surfaces on the northern and southern ends of the existing West Covina Library (see Exhibits 2 through 4) in order to develop a four-story, approximately 70 foot tall, 55,242 square feet professional office building (55,120 square feet of net usable area) to be subdivided and sold as 39 condominium units (see Exhibit 5, Site Plan). This project is being designed for full occupancy by a variety of medical and dental offices; however, other types of professional offices could also occupy building space. The proposed building will be constructed on an existing, 98- space parking area. The project’s primary parking area will include 218 parking spaces. The project will replace the existing, 42-space parking area that currently Section 1: Project Description 6 September 2011 serves the adjacent library with an expanded, 129-space parking area on the southeast side of the library. A total net gain of 206 parking spaces between the two proposed parking lots will be achieved. Primary vehicular access would be provided via a new driveway connection to West Covina Parkway. Secondary access would be provided to the east via an existing parking lot and driveway on Garvey Avenue and on West Covina Parkway to the southeast of the library. Wet and dry utility connections would be made to existing facilities located within the Civic Center site and no off-site improvements are proposed. Phase 1 of construction for the proposed project will be the demolition and repaving of the library parking lot. Phase 2 of construction will be the office building and will entail demolition of the existing parking lot, site clearing, grading, and building construction, paving of the new primary parking lot, and architectural coating. Construction is anticipated to last approximately 13 months, beginning in early 2012. The project includes landscaping in both phases of the project (see Exhibits 6 and 7). Landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the office building and the primary parking area with interior plantings in parking lot planters. Landscaping is proposed throughout planters in the library parking area. Phase 1 landscaping features jacaranda, Muskogee, and Australian willow. Phase 2 landscaping features jacaranda, chatalpa, canary island palm, soquel, and coast live oak. 1.9 – Background Information The undeveloped portion of this site is a remnant piece of the West Covina Civic Center where excess soil materials from grading of the civic center were placed and then landscaped. No prior uses of this site have been identified beyond the existing parking lot. 1.10 – Surrounding Land Uses North: Garvey Avenue and I-10 Freeway. A variety of commercial buildings are located along the opposite side of the freeway. South: West Covina Parkway, Commercial Development (K-Mart and vacant/former bank building) East: West Covina Civic Center, including City Hall, Police Department, Library, County Court House and County Health Department offices West: I-10/Pacific Avenue Parkway freeway interchange and Doctor’s Hospital 1.11 – Environmental Setting This site is located in a fully urbanized area, on a remnant piece of the West Covina Civic Center. About 1/3 of the site consists of paved surface parking that supports the adjacent West Covina public Library, and the remaining area consists of landscaped ground surfaces, mostly planted with mature ornamental trees and some shrubs and ground covers. There is no native vegetation, natural or constructed streams or drainages or other features that would characterize open space that supports wildlife habitat. The site is bordered by a regional freeway to the north and a major arterial to the west, and all surrounding lands are developed with a variety of commercial uses, City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 7 including medical offices to the south. All urban infrastructure existing in the immediate area, including water, sewer, storm drainage, electrical, natural gas and telecommunications facilities. 1.12 – Required Approvals The City of West Covina is the only land use authority for this project and this project will require the following City approvals:  General Plan Amendment, to re-designate the site from Public Facilities to Neighborhood Commercial  Zone Change, to reclassify the site from Public Buildings to Neighborhood Commercial  Precise Plan, to authorize the proposed site and building improvements  Tree Removal Permit, to authorize removal of a number of mature specimen trees within the front and side yards  Tentative Subdivision Map, to create 39 condominium ownership spaces for sale to future occupants 1.13 – Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required None Section 1: Project Description 8 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 9 Exhibit 1 Project Location Exhibit 1 Project Location Section 1: Project Description 10 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 11 Exhibit 2 Photographic Survey Orientation Map Section 1: Project Description 12 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 13 Exhibit 3 Site Photos 1-6 Section 1: Project Description 14 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 15 Exhibit 4 Site Photos 7-13 Section 1: Project Description 16 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 17 Exhibit 5 Site Plan Section 1: Project Description 18 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 19 Exhibit 6 Primary Landscape Plan Section 1: Project Description 20 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 21 Exhibit 7 Library Landscape Plan Section 1: Project Description 22 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 23 Exhibit 8 North and West Building Elevations Section 1: Project Description 24 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 25 Exhibit 9 South and East Building Elevations Section 1: Project Description 26 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 27 Section 2: Determination 2.1 – Environmental Factors Potentially Affected □ Aesthetics □ Agriculture and Forest Resources □ Air Quality □ Biological Resources □ Cultural Resources □ Geology /Soils □ Greenhouse Gas Emissions □ Hazards & Hazardous Materials □ Hydrology / Water Quality □ Land Use / Planning □ Mineral Resources □ Noise □ Population / Housing □ Public Services □ Recreation □ Transportation/Traffic □ Utilities / Service Systems □ Mandatory Findings of Significance 2.2 – Determination □ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. □ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. □ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. □ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Fabiola Wong, Senior Planner Date Section 2: Determination 28 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 29 Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 3.1 – Aesthetics Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? □ □ □ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within view from a state scenic highway? □ □ □ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? □ □ □ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? □ □ □ a) No Impact. A significant impact would occur if the project introduces incompatible visual elements within a public field or substantially blocks a scenic vista. Scenic vistas are generally descried into two ways: Panoramic views (visual access to a large geographic area for which the field of view can be wide and extend into the distance) and focal views (visual access to a particular object, scene, or feature of interest). The primary scenic vistas in West Covina are of the San Gabriel Mountains in the distance to the north, visible on clear days. These views of the mountainside are generally largely obstructed by trees, utility poles, and other buildings throughout the San Gabriel Valley. The proposed project is located on a developed civic center site, next to the I-10 Freeway, within a fully urbanized area visually dominated by commercial land uses and surface street features. This site is not considered to be within or to comprise a portion of a scenic vista. Replacement of existing landscape features with the proposed four-story office building and a mixture of trees and lower landscaping elements would have no effect on a scenic vista. As such, the proposed project would result in no impact with respect to view of a scenic vista. b) Less than Significant Impact. The adjacent segment of the I-10 Freeway occurs in a fully urbanized area and it is not classified as a scenic highway or any kind of a scenic corridor. No State-designated official or eligible scenic highways are located within the Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 30 September 2011 vicinity of the project limits.1 Given this, the proposed project would have no effect on any scenic resources along a scenic highway. The existing mature trees on site provide a pleasant visual appearance from adjacent civic center uses, the freeway, West Covina Parkway and Garvey Avenue; but are not considered to be a scenic resource. While all of the existing trees would be removed to construct the proposed office building and parking improvements, the proposed landscape plan consists of numerous trees, including trees of the same species that are being removed. This will offset the loss of the visual value of the existing trees and the project’s impact would be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project is located within a fully urbanized area surrounded by a major urban freeway (I-10), commercial and civic land uses, and major surface street features. The project site is a remnant piece of a larger civic center complex developed years ago, and contains two noticeable earthen mounds that are planted with numerous mature trees, shrubbery and ground covers. One mound is approximately 20 feet above the adjacent flat ground surfaces, and the other is nearly 30 feet above the nearest flat ground surface. Buildings within the adjacent civic center include City Hall (a three-story modern structure), the West Covina Library (a one-two story structure), West Covina Court House (a one-story structure). Other visual features in the civic center include a parking structure next to City Hall and surface parking, along with a variety of landscaping and pedestrian paths. This project would construct additional vehicle parking area east of the library, where an open landscaped plaza occurs. Landscape elements would be included in the new parking lot, and the pedestrian circulation in this area would be maintained. This would result in a minor change in the visual character of that area. A majority of the four-story building would be 60 feet tall, from the ground floor to the top of the roof parapet. An 11-foot high tower element would be situated in the corner of the structure, raising the maximum building height in that part of the building to 71 feet above the graded ground level. The graded ground level would be substantially lower than it is today, due to removal of the two earthen mounds on site, so that much of the new first floor of the building bulk would occur within the existing mass of the earthen mounds. The proposed building would be higher than neighboring buildings within the civic center and on surrounding commercial sites, and it would be as visible as the existing tree-topped mounds are from all directions. Since the new building would be located at the northern edge of the site, with significant open area between it and the Police Department and Library facilities, it would appear as a distinct visual element. With a modern architectural theme including storefront glazing of the upper tower element, fine sanded plaster finish on the main exterior walls and extensive landscaping along the perimeter and within the new parking areas, the project would be compatible with the visual character and quality of this site and surroundings. It is also noted that this project is located in the Central Business District of the City of West Covina, where buildings are taller than elsewhere in the City. Furthermore, the proposed Neighborhood Commercial zoning for the property, does not have a required height limit or maximum allowable number of stories unless the property is located within 100 feet of a single family zone. The nearest area zoned single family is across the San Bernardino Freeway, approximately 570 feet from the project site. This project would not degrade the visual character of this site or surroundings. 1 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: Los Angeles County. Accessed March 22, 2011. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 31 d) Less than Significant Impact. There are lighting sources adjacent to this site, including free-standing street lights, light fixtures on buildings, pole-mounted lights, traffic signals and vehicle headlights. Indoor and outdoor lighting sources would be included in the proposed project; however only outdoor lighting could have any effect on neighboring land uses. Outdoor lighting would consist of pole-mounting lights in parking areas, possibly ground level lighting for pedestrian walkways, and possibly building-mounted security lighting. Light spillover and glare will be prevented, by requiring lights to be designed so as to prevent the light from shining directly onto surrounding property, per the requirements of the West Covina Municipal Code Section 26-570 and the Parking Lot Design and Lighting Standards Guidelines (Planning Commission Resolution No. 2513, Revision No. 8). Outdoor architectural building lighting would also be subject to West Covina Municipal Code Section 26-570, which requires all luminaires to be designed and placed to complement the development and reflect away from adjoining properties. The nearest land use that could be affected by the nighttime light would be the West Covina Library, which is open until 8 pm Tuesday – Thursday, and thus open during some periods of darkness throughout the year. Adherence to the City’s standard lighting control procedures will reduce any impact associated with new lighting to less-than-significant. Some metal and potentially reflective materials are proposed for the building finishes, including a canopy with aluminum edge, a storefront system with clear anodized aluminum trim, and metal aluminum railings, these features could potentially result in some reflectivity during daytime hours. These trim features do not compose substantial façade square footage and are included as architectural treatments to increase aesthetic quality. Given the minimal treatment of metal materials in the design of the office building, reflective glare impacts would be less than significant. Nonetheless, the City’s standard conditions of approval prohibit the use of reflective materials. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 32 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 33 3.2 – Agriculture and Forest Resources Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? □ □ □ b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? □ □ □ c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g))? □ □ □ d) Result in loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? □ □ □ e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? □ □ □ a-b, e) No impact. No farmland or other agricultural activities exist in or adjacent to the undeveloped and ornamentally landscaped project site, which is bordered by existing civic center uses and the San Bernardino (I-10) Freeway. There is no farmland or other agricultural land uses in this highly urbanized part of West Covina. The project site is currently zoned as Public Building, which does not allow for agricultural uses. No Williamson Act contracts exist within the project area. There would be no impact to any farmland or any agricultural land uses. c-d, e) No impact. The few dozen ornamental trees on site were introduced and planted within fill materials, and are not a remnant of any natural forest. These trees do not represent a potential for a viable source of timberland. There would be no impact to forest lands or timberland. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 34 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 35 3.3 – Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? □ □ □ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? □ □ □ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? □ □ □ d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? □ □ □ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if the proposed project conflicts with or obstructs implementation of the South Coast Air Basin 2007 Air Quality Management Plan. Conflicts and obstructions that hinder implementation of the AQMP can delay efforts to meet attainment deadlines for criteria pollutants and maintaining existing compliance with applicable air quality standards. Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the South Coast Air Basin 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is affirmed when a project (1) does not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new violation and (2) is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP. Consistency review is presented below: The project would result in short-term construction and long-term pollutant emissions that are less than the CEQA significance emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, with mitigation incorporated, as demonstrated in Section 3.3 et seq. of this report; therefore, the project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of any air quality standards violation and would not cause a new air quality standard violation. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 36 September 2011 The CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that consistency with AQMP growth assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and “significant projects.” Significant projects include airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, designation of oil drilling districts, water ports, solid waste disposal sites, and off-shore drilling facilities. Although the proposed office building is the not considered a significant project, the proposed General Plan amendment from Public Facilities to Regional Commercial will be analyzed for AQMP consistency. The 2007 AQMP long-term emissions inventory was modeled from the growth projections utilized in the 2004 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).i RTP growth projections are developed utilizing a comprehensive analysis of fertility, mortality, migration, labor force, housing units, and local policies such as land use plans. Regional growth forecasts for the RTP were updated in 2008 and are being updated again, for the 2012 RTP. Growth projections for the 2008 RTP predicted a citywide employment growth between 2005 and 2020 of approximately 2,500.2 This project’s estimated 221 jobs represents less than 10% of that citywide projection. The growth forecasts for the 2012 RTP update, based on city input, predicts West Covina employment growth between 2008 and 2020 of approximately 2,281 jobs.3 The proposed project’s employment represents about 10% of this new forecast. This project would accommodate additional local employment that is well within the growth forecasts developed for the RTP. Based on the consistency analysis presented above, the proposed project will not conflict with the AQMP and impacts will be less than significant. b) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. A project may have a significant impact if project related emissions would exceed Federal, State, or regional standards or thresholds, or if project-related emissions would substantially contribute to an existing or project air quality violations. The proposed Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin, where efforts to attain state and federal air quality standards are governed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Both the state of California (State) and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants (known as ‘criteria pollutants’). These pollutants include ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), inhalable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5), and lead. The state has also established AAQS for additional pollutants. The AAQS are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace within a reasonable margin of safety. Where the state and federal standards differ, California AAQS are more stringent than the national AAQS. Air pollution levels are measured at monitoring stations located throughout the air basin. Areas that are in nonattainment with respect to federal or state AAQS are required to prepare plans and implement measures that will bring the region into attainment. Table 3.3.1 (South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status) summarizes the attainment status in the Basin for the criteria pollutants. Discussion of potential impacts related to short-term construction impacts and long-term area source and operational impacts are presented below. 2 http://www.scag.ca.gov/forecast/downloads/excel/RTP07_CityLevel.xls (accessed June 2, 2011). 3 http://www.scag.ca.gov/forecast/downloads/excel/RTP2012-GROWTH-FORECAST.xls (accessed June 2, 2011). City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 37 Table 3.3.1 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status Pollutant Federal State O3 (1-hr) N/A Nonattainment O3 (8-hr) Nonattainment Nonattainment PM10 Nonattainment Nonattainment PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment CO Attainment Attainment NO2 Attainment Attainment SO2 Attainment Attainment Pb Attainment Attainment Sources: CARB 2010, USEPA 2010 Construction Emissions The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2011.1.1 was utilized to estimate emissions from the proposed demolition and construction activities (see Appendix A, Air Quality Modeling Data). The entire construction program is anticipated to be completed in 13 months, beginning in January 2012, as summarized in Table 3.3.2: Table 3.3.2 Tentative Construction Schedule Start End Days Demolition (Library Parking) 01/02/12 01/27/12 20 Paving (Library Parking) 01/28/12 02/22/12 18 Demolition (Building Site) 02/23/12 03/21/12 20 Site Clearing 03/22/12 03/28/12 5 Grading 03/29/12 04/18/12 15 Building Construction 04/19/12 03/06/13 230 Paving (Building Parking) 03/07/13 04/02/13 18 Architectural Coating 04/03/13 04/26/13 18 Total 344 Note* Dates are tentative and subject to change, but durations are considered firm estimates Phase I of the construction program includes demolition and clearing of the existing Los parking lot on the west side of the library and paving of a new parking lot consisting of 129 parking spaces. Phase II includes the demolition, clearing, grading, construction, paving, and painting of the proposed office building. Key estimates utilized in CalEEMod to calculate construction emissions include:  20,700 cubic yards (CY) of soil export  1,360 tons of asphalt/concrete demolition and disposal Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 38 September 2011 The maximum (summer or winter) results of the analysis are summarized in Table 3.3.3 (Unmitigated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions). The model indicates that architectural coating activities during year 2013 could exceed the daily emissions threshold for volatile organic compounds (VOC) threshold established by SCAQMD; therefore, coating activities could result in potentially significant short-term criteria pollutant (ozone) precursor emissions impacts. Table 3.3.3 Unmitigated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) Activity ROG VOC* NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 2012 Demolition (Library Parking) 9.97 77.61 46.55 0.07 5.89 3.90 Paving (Library Parking) 5.38 27.86 18.70 0.03 2.73 2.42 Demolition (Building Site) 9.91 77.14 46.32 0.07 6.17 3.88 Site Clearing 10.85 84.86 49.28 0.07 22.63 4.28 Grading 12.14 94.63 58.33 0.10 33.16 4.60 Building Construction 7.82 43.45 32.4 0.06 4.09 2.77 2012 Daily Maximum 12.14 94.63 58.33 0.10 33.16 4.60 2013 Building Construction 7.21 40.19 31.36 0.06 3.81 2.49 Paving (Building Parking) 5.07 27.08 18.41 0.03 2.56 2.25 Architectural Coating 226.82 3.06 2.98 0.00 0.49 0.28 2013 Daily Maximum 226.82 40.19 31.36 0.06 3.81 2.49 Maximum Emissions 226.82 94.63 58.33 0.10 33.16 4.60 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 55 150 Significant Impact? Yes No No No No No Source: CalEEMod v. 2011.1.1 - Hogle-Ireland 2011. Calculation sheets are provided in Appendix A. *Volatile organic compounds (VOC) are measured as reactive organic compounds (ROG) Ozone is a pungent, colorless, and highly reactive gas that forms from the atmospheric reaction of organic gases with nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight. Ozone is most commonly associated with smog. Ozone precursors such as reactive organic gases (ROG), volatile organic compounds (VOC), and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) are released from mobile and stationary sources. Ozone is a respiratory irritant and can cause cardiovascular diseases, eye irritation, and impaired cardiopulmonary function. Ozone can also cause damage to building materials and plant leafs. In order to reduce impacts associated with VOC emissions from paints, adhesives and other coating applications, Mitigation Measure A-1 will be incorporated. Mitigation Measure A-1 requires use of low-VOC paints for interior and exterior coatings, specifically, a maximum VOC content of 50 grams per liter (g/l) for interior coatings and 100 g/l for exterior coatings. Use of low-VOC paints will be required to be identified on building construction plans and verified by the City Building Official during regular inspections. Mitigated construction emissions are summarized in Table 3.3.4 (Mitigated Daily Construction Emissions). With incorporation of Mitigation Measure A-1, coating-related VOC emissions will be reduced to 57.30 lbs/day, below the 75 lbs/day threshold established by SCAQMD; therefore, short-term VOC emissions impacts will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 39 Table 3.3.4 Mitigated Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) Activity ROG VOC* NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 2012 Demolition (Library Parking) 9.97 77.61 46.55 0.07 5.89 3.90 Paving (Library Parking) 5.38 27.86 18.70 0.03 2.73 2.42 Demolition (Building Site) 9.91 77.14 46.32 0.07 6.17 3.88 Site Clearing 10.85 84.86 49.28 0.07 22.63 4.28 Grading 12.68 99.06 61.03 0.11 35.67 4.77 Building Construction 7.82 43.45 32.4 0.06 4.09 2.77 2012 Daily Maximum 12.14 94.63 58.33 0.10 33.16 4.60 2013 Building Construction 7.21 40.19 31.36 0.06 3.81 2.49 Paving (Building Parking) 5.07 27.08 18.41 0.03 2.56 2.25 Architectural Coating 57.30 3.06 2.98 0.00 0.49 0.28 2013 Daily maximum 57.30 40.19 31.36 0.06 3.81 2.49 Maximum Emissions 57.30 94.63 58.33 0.10 33.16 4.60 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 55 150 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod v. 2011.1.1 - Hogle-Ireland 2011. Calculation sheets are provided in Appendix A. *Volatile organic compounds (VOC) are measured as reactive organic compounds (ROG) The analysis summarized in Tables 3.3.3 and 3.3.4 assumes that the 2,700 CY of soil will be required to be exported from the site and will be hauled no more than 10 miles. The Los Angeles County Solid Waste Management Department was consulted to identify public facilities within the project vicinity that could accept soil as part of the County’s construction & demolition debris recycling program. The Azusa Land Reclamation Landfill located at 1211 West Gladstone Street in Azusa is located approximately 3.9 miles from the project site. Three facilities in Irwindale that range in distance from 4.4 miles to 4.8 miles were also identified and able to accept the soil. To ensure that emissions thresholds are not exceeded (particularly the NOX threshold) due to soil exporting activities, Mitigation Measure A-2 will be incorporated, limiting soil hauling to 10 miles or less. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure A-2 will ensure that impacts related to soil export are less than significant. Operational Emissions Long-term criteria air pollutant emissions will result from the operation of the proposed professional and medical office uses. Long-term emissions are categorized as area source emissions, energy demand emissions, and operational emissions. Operational emissions will result from automobile and other vehicle sources associated with daily trips to and from the proposed offices. CalEEMod model was utilized to estimate mobile source emissions. Trip generation (2,000 daily weekday trips) is based on the project traffic study prepared by KOA Corporation (see Appendix E). Area source emissions are the combination of many small emission sources that include use of outdoor landscape maintenance equipment, use of consumer products such as cleaning products, and periodic repainting of the proposed warehouses. Energy demand emissions result from use of electricity and natural gas. Emissions from area sources were estimated using CalEEMod using program default values for area and energy demand emissions. Operational emissions are summarized in Table 3.3.5 (Long-Term Daily Emissions). Long- Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 40 September 2011 term emissions will not exceed the daily thresholds established by SCAQMD; impacts will be less than significant. Table 3.3.5 Long-Term Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Summer Area Sources 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Demand 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.01 Mobile Sources 5.53 13.81 54.37 0.09 10.44 0.66 Summer Total 10.14 13.96 54.50 0.09 10.45 0.67 Winter Area Sources 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Demand 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.01 Mobile Sources 5.82 14.82 53.21 0.09 10.44 0.67 Winter Total 10.43 14.97 53.34 0.09 10.45 0.68 Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Source: CalEEmod v. 2011.1.1 - Hogle Ireland 2011. Calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix A. Mitigation Measures A-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the City Building Official shall verify that construction plans submitted by the project proponent reflect use of architectural coatings that include the following:  The content of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in proposed architectural coatings shall not exceed 50 g/l for interior applications.  The content of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in proposed architectural coatings shall not exceed 100 g/l for exterior applications. This measure shall be verified through standard building inspections in light of the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. A-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City Building Official shall verify that grading plans submitted by the project proponent identify the location where exported soil is to be transferred and that the identified location is 10 miles or less from the project site. This measure shall be verified in light of the performance standard that criteria pollutant emissions from soil hauling shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. c) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Cumulative short-term, construction-related emissions and long-term, operational emissions from the project will not contribute considerably to any potential cumulative air quality impact because short- term project emissions will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated (Mitigation City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 41 Measures A-1 and A-2) and operational emissions will not exceed any SCAQMD daily threshold. Furthermore, other concurrent construction projects and operations in the region will be required to implement standard air quality regulations and mitigation pursuant to State CEQA requirements, just as this project has. Impacts will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. d) Less than Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors are those segments of the population that are most susceptible to poor air quality such as children, the elderly, the sick, and athletes who perform outdoors. Land uses associated with sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes. The nearest land use that could be considered as a “sensitive receptor” is the Doctor’s Hospital, located approximately ¼ mile west, at 725 S. Orange Avenue. The proposed medical office building would not generate toxic or criteria pollutant emissions, since the professional/medical office tenants would consist of typical small-scale medical and dental services that do not produce such emissions. As noted in the responses to item 3.2b-c, above, construction-phase emissions will be controlled to ensure levels of volatile organic compounds are below the recommended SCAQMD threshold, and long-term emissions would be below the daily thresholds for all criteria pollutants. The proposed medical office building, therefore, would have a less than significant impact on sensitive receptors due to criteria pollutant emissions. A carbon monoxide (CO) hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. CO hotspots have the potential for violation of State and Federal CO standards at study area intersections, even if the broader Basin is in attainment for Federal and State levels. In general, SCAQMD and the California Department of Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol (CO Protocol) recommend analysis of CO hotspots when a project has the potential for resulting in higher CO concentrations within the region and increases traffic congestion at an intersection by more than two percent that is operating at LOS D or worse. The traffic study prepared by KOA (Appendix E) determined that Pacific Avenue at I-10 Westbound on/off ramps currently operates and would continue to operate at LOS E and would eventually operate at LOS F by 2016 with cumulative traffic growth ad project trip generation. Due to the increase in congestion of the intersection as rated by Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU), the traffic study recommends that an additional northbound left turn lane be constructed. With this mitigation (Mitigation Measure T-1) incorporated, intersection delay would be reduced when compared to existing and future conditions and therefore would not result in a two percent increase in congestion that would warrant additional modeling and analysis. See the Transportation and Traffic section analysis for further details. The traffic study also determined that no other intersections currently or are anticipated to operated at LOS D or worse as a result of the project. Considering the improvement in operation of Pacific Avenue at the I-10 ramps, impacts related to carbon monoxide hotspots would be less than significant. e) Less Than Significant Impact. According to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints include agricultural operations, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and certain industrial operations (such as manufacturing uses that produce chemicals, paper, etc.). Odors are typically associated with industrial projects involving the use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong-smelling elements used in manufacturing processes, as well as sewage treatment facilities and landfills. There are no such uses within the project vicinity that produce substantial odors; Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 42 September 2011 furthermore, the proposed medical office building would not release odors produced by small-level applications of chemical substances outside of the building. As the Proposed Project involves no elements related to industrial projects, no objectionable odors are anticipated. Therefore, impacts associate with objectionable odor would be less than significant. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 43 3.4 – Biological Resources Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? □ □ □ b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? □ □ □ c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? □ □ □ d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? □ □ □ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? □ □ □ Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 44 September 2011 f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporation. A significant impact would occur if the Proposed Project were to remove or modify habitat for any species identified or designated as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the State or federal regulatory agencies. The proposed project is located on a site currently occupied by a surface parking lot and ornamental vegetation, including mature trees, in the context of a completely urbanized setting located immediately adjacent to the San Bernardino Freeway, civic uses including a library, police station, courthouse, and city hall, and a regional shopping center to the east. The project site is not identified as critical habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species.4 Considering the highly developed nature of the project site surrounding areas, the probability of existence of designated species under the federal Endangered Species Act or California Special Concern Species is very low. All migratory non-game native bird species are protected by international treaty under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (50 C.F.R. Section 10.13). Pursuant to the MBTA, it is unlawful to "take" (i.e., capture, kill, pursue, or possess) migratory birds or their nests. Virtually all native bird species are covered by the MBTA. While there is no established protocol for nest avoidance, when consulted, the California Department of Fish and Game generally recommends avoidance buffers of about 500 feet for birds-of-prey, and 100 to 300 feet for songbirds, but this is decided on a case-by-case basis. The period from approximately February 1st through August 31st encompasses the breeding season for most birds in the surrounding areas. As such, mitigation has been included requiring that a nesting assessment be conducted if construction is to occur between February 1st to August 31st. Such assessment will ascertain the potential for nesting birds and determine appropriate mitigation (i.e. delayed construction). Significant impacts to migratory birds would be avoided with this mitigation. Mitigation Measure B-1 If construction is to occur at any time between February 1st to August 31st, a qualified biologist shall visit the site at least 10 days prior to initiation of construction to determine whether migratory non-game native bird species are actively nesting. If no bird nests are detected during these surveys, then construction-related activities may proceed. If migratory non-game native bird nesting is confirmed, and/or adult special-status birds are found within the project site, construction shall be delayed until two weeks after the young have fledged, as confirmed by a qualified biologist. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. b) No Impact. The project is located on a disturbed remnant piece of a developed civic center infill site in a primarily commercial portion of the City. While numerous ornamental 4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species. <http://criticalhabitat.fws.gov/> [Accessed March 22, 2011] City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 45 trees, shrubs and ground cover occur on site, there is no riparian habitat onsite, thus no impact will occur. c) No Impact. There are no water resources within or near the project limits. The closest water resource is Walnut Creek (which has been channelized with concrete), located south of the project site. According to a review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wetlands Online Mapper,5 no wetlands, as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, exist on or in the immediate vicinity of the project limits. Therefore, no impacts to wetlands would occur. d) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporation. The project site is located in a fully urbanized area, which does not support movement of native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. No wildlife corridors or nursery sites are located on or in proximity to the project limits. However, the project does contain multiple mature trees which may provide habitat for nesting birds. Mitigation Measure B-1, defined in the earlier response to 3.4.a, would avoid significant impacts on nesting birds protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. e) Less than Significant Impact. The project site contains numerous mature trees and other vegetation on berms consisting of fill resulting from construction of the Civic Center in the 1960s and within the existing library parking lot. Trees on the site include pine trees of approximately 50 feet in height, mature jacaranda approximately 30 feet in height, and bottle-brush trees, along with fewer numbers of other ornamental species. Most of the pine trees are located on the berms, adding to their sense of height. A tree survey conducted in May 2011 determined that the trees are generally in good health, and the largest ones exhibit the best form.6: Article VI, Division 9 of the West Covina Zoning Code regulate the preservation, protection, and removal of trees on public and private property in the City. As defined by the Zoning Code, a heritage tree shall mean any tree(s) identified as such by planning commission resolution. Heritage tree shall also mean any of the Southern California black walnut tree species (Juglans californica), located in the San Jose Hills as found within West Covina's jurisdictional boundaries. As defined by the Zoning Code, a significant tree is a tree located on private and/or public property that meets one or more of the following requirements: (a) is located in the front yard of a lot or parcel and has a caliper of one (1) foot or more; (b) is located in the street-side yard of a corner lot and has a caliper of one (1) foot or more; (c) is located anywhere on a lot, has a caliper of six (6) inches, or more, and is one of the following species: any oak tree native to California, California Sycamore, or American Sycamore. Only two trees (California Sycamores) were identified as heritage trees on the project site. These two trees are located within the replacement parking area for the library. None of the other specific species of trees protected by the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance are located on the site. In addition, there are multiple trees on the site that have a caliper of one foot or more and could be considered to be located in the front or side yard of the site (as portions of the site are currently undeveloped), and therefore could be considered significant trees. Virtually all of the mature trees on site will be removed to allow for the 5 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory Wetlands Online Mapper. <http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html> [Accessed March 22, 2011] 6 ctdla (craig thomas duncan landscape architecture), Tree Survey Plan, May 24, 2011. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 46 September 2011 new development to occur, as these trees occupy the majority of the site not previously developed for surface parking. The City’s Tree Protection Ordinance will require a tree removal permit from the City’s Planning Division. Loss of the existing ornamental trees would not result in a significant impact to biological resources and would be offset with numerous replacement trees, including many of the same species that presently occur on site, such as the two existing California Sycamore trees. f) No Impact. This fully urbanized area is not within or near any land governed by a habitat conservation plan.7 Accordingly, the proposed project would not conflict with any local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. 7 California Department of Fish and Game. Natural Community Conservation Planning. <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/habcon/nccp/statusl/> [Accessed March 22, 2011] City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 47 3.5 – Cultural Resources Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in '15064.5? □ □ □ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? □ □ □ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? □ □ □ d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? □ □ □ a) No Impact. This property does not satisfy any of the criteria for a historic resource defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines. No known historically or culturally significant resources, structures, buildings, or objects are located on the project site. As such, the proposed project would not cause an adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and impacts to historic resources are not anticipated. b-d) Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporation. The project site is located in an urbanized area that has been previously disturbed and heavily affected by past activities, specifically construction of the Civic Center in the 1960s. During Civic Center construction, displaced fill was piled into two large hills that now form the topography of the site. Given that this topography is the result of fill displaced by previous construction, any cultural resources that may have existed at one time likely have been previously unearthed or disturbed. No archeological or paleontological resources or human remains are expected to be found within the fill material that will be excavated during project grading activities. No known human burials have been identified on the Project Site or its vicinity. However, it is possible that unknown human remains could be located on the Project Site, and if proper care is not taken during Proposed Project construction, particularly during excavation activities, damage to or destruction of these unknown remains could occur. To ensure that any such materials or human remains, if found, are properly identified (and the resource recovered, if necessary), before grading or other earth moving activities proceed in that immediate area, the following mitigation measures are included. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 48 September 2011 Mitigation Measures C-1 Prior to excavation and construction of the Project Site, the prime construction contractor(s) shall be cautioned on the legal and/or regulatory implications of knowingly destroying cultural resources or removing artifacts, human remains, bottles and other cultural materials from the Project Site. C-2 If potential archaeological materials are uncovered during grading or other earth moving activities, the contractor shall be required to halt work in the immediate area of the find, and to retain a professional archaeologist to examine the materials to determine whether it is a “unique archaeological resource” as defined in Section 21083.2(g) of the State CEQA Statues. If this determination is positive, the scientifically consequential information shall be fully recovered by the archaeologist. Work may continue outside of the area of the find; however, no further work shall occur in the immediate location of the find until all information recovery has been completed and a report concerning it filed with the City Planning Department. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. C-3 If paleontological materials are uncovered during grading or other earth moving activities, the contractor shall be required to halt work in the immediate area of the find, and to retain a professional paleontologist to examine the materials to determine whether it is a significant paleontological resource. If this determination is positive, the scientifically consequential information shall be fully recovered by the paleontologist. Work may continue outside of the area of the find; however, no further work shall occur in the immediate location of the find until all information recovery has been completed and a report concerning it filed with the City Planning Department. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. C-4 If suspected human remains be encountered during grading or other earth moving activities, the contractor shall be required halt work in the immediate area of the find and to notify the County Coroner, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, who must then determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner, with the aid of a supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are or appear to be of a Native American, he/she shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission for further investigations and proper recovery of such remains, if necessary. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 49 3.6 – Geology and Soils Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. □ □ □ ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? □ □ □ iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? □ □ □ iv) Landslides? □ □ □ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? □ □ □ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? □ □ □ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? □ □ □ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? □ □ □ Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 50 September 2011 a.i) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is not located within the boundaries of an Earthquake Fault Zone identified for fault-rupture hazard as defined by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act.8 Evidence of faulting on site was not observed during the preliminary geotechnical investigations conducted for this project. There are traces of two known faults within the borders of West Covina, these are the Walnut Creek fault and the San Jose Hills fault. These two faults are well defined or studied. The Walnut Creek tracing is located under basin sediment that has for years been deposited from the San Gabriel and surrounding mountains.9 Thus, the potential for surface ground rupture at the project site is considered low. Since this site is located within the seismically active southern California region, there is some possibility that there could be (a) trace(s) of (a) previously unidentified fault(s) somewhere on site. If evidence of faulting were to be discovered during the grading phase, potential building hazards would be mitigated to a level of less than significant, through application of already-required provisions of the California Building Code (CBC), which sets construction design standards that can reduce potential impact related to seismic activity, including fault rupture. Mitigation Measure G-1 below is required ensuring compliance with applicable City and stating building codes and requirements. Therefore, with incorporation of the mitigation measure below, potential impacts associated with the exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury , or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault would be reduced to less than significant levels. Impacts would be less than significant. a.ii) Less than Significant Impact. As with all properties in the seismically active southern California region, the project site is susceptible to ground shaking during a seismic event. The geotechnical report prepared for this project10 indicates the most likely source of significant ground shaking would be the San Jose Fault, located approximately 2.4 miles away. Estimated earthquake magnitudes for this area range from 6.5 to 7.0 on the Richter scale. The proposed building must be designed and constructed in accordance with the seismic safety criteria set forth in the latest edition of the California Building Code (CBC). Initial recommendations for grading, foundation and structural design are provided in the geotechnical report; these will be incorporated into the plans submitted for grading and building permits. Compliance with the CBC and the recommendations in the project geotechnical report will ensure impacts due to strong seismic ground shaking would be less than significant. a.iii) No Impact. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated silty to cohesionless soils below the groundwater table are subject to a temporary loss of strength due to the buildup of excess pore pressure during cyclic stresses induced by an earthquake. As result, the soils may acquire a high degree of mobility (which can lead to lateral spreading, consolidation and settlement of loose sediments, ground oscillation), flow failure, loss of bearing strength, ground fissuring, and san boils, and other damaging deformations. Liquefaction typically occurs in areas where groundwater is less than 50 8 California Department of Conservation and California Geologic Survey, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones. <http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/ap/pages/index.aspx> Accessed March 22, 2011. 9 City of West Covina. Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan. Approved October 19, 1994. Available at: http;//www.westcovina.org/cityhall/fire/prepare/nhmp/default.asp, accessed July 13, 2011. 10 Quartech Consultants, Report of Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Proposed Office Development, Southeast Corner of Garvey Avenue and West Covina Parkway – APN 8474-001- 906, West Covina, California, QCI Project No. 10-051-004GE. April 18, 2011. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 51 feet from the surface, and where the soils are composed of poorly consolidated, fine– to medium-grained sand. In addition to the necessary soil conditions, the ground acceleration and duration of the earthquake must also be of a sufficient level to initiate liquefaction. According to the Department of Conservation’s Seismic Hazard Map (Baldwin Park Quadrangle), the project site is not located with a State Seismic hazard Zone for liquefaction.11 As such, the project site would not be considered prone to liquefaction and impacts would be less than significant.12 a.iv) No Impact. The project site is located within a topographically flat portion of the San Gabriel Valley. According to the Department of Conservation’s Seismic Hazards Map (Baldwin Hazards Map (Baldwin Park Quadrangle), the project site is not located within a landslide hazard zone.13 Additionally, the project site is not immediately adjacent to any mountains or steep slopes. As such, the project site is relatively flat and free from the potential of landslides. Therefore, the probability of seismically induced landslide affecting the project site is considered to be removed. As such, no impact is anticipated. b) Less Than-Significant Impact. Initial site clearing and grading would remove all existing surface vegetation that would expose soils for a limited time, allowing for possible erosion due to wind or rainstorms. Erosion will be minimized through the use of appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs). Examples of possible BMPs include sandbag barriers, sediment traps, covering of soil stockpiles, etc. The BMPs would be detailed in a an Erosion Control Plan, pursuant to the City’s grading permit standards, and also in a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP), which is required to comply with the latest National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Regulations and requires approval from the City Engineer and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. A majority of the developed site would be covered with impermeable surfaces, including the building footprint area, paved parking and driveways; in these areas, soil erosion could not occur. Permeable surfaces would be landscaped and this would prevent any significant soil erosion. Little, if any, native topsoil is likely to occur on site, since it is comprised of displaced soil materials excavated during construction of the adjacent civic center complex. No impacts involving loss of topsoil are anticipated. c) Less Than Significant Impact. Unstable ground conditions that would pose a serious constraint to site development were not identified in the geotechnical report prepared for this project (Quartech Consultants, April 2011). This project will be constructed to satisfy all applicable building standards and codes, and will incorporate the recommendations of the geotechnical report relative to site preparation, foundation design, and temporary trenching and backfilling, to ensure that the building is constructed on a stable foundation, and that the construction activities do not result in unsafe ground conditions. 11 California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. State of California Seismic Hazard Zones: Baldwin Park Quadrangle. Released March 25, 1999. Available at: http://www.conservation,ca.gov/cgs/Pages/Indez.aspx, accessed July 13, 2011. 12 California Department of Conservation and Seismic Hazards Zonation Program. Seismic Hazard Zone Maps. <http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/pdf/ozn_baldp.pdf> Accessed March 22, 2011. 13 Ibid. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 52 September 2011 d) No Impact. Expansive soils are clay-based soils that tend to expand (increase in volume) as they absorb water and shrink (lessen in volume) as water is drawn away. If soils consist of expansive clay, foundation movement and/or damage can occur if wetting and drying of the clay does not occur uniformly across the entire area. Expansive soils were not found during the geotechnical investigations conducted at the project site. The sandy/silty soils that underlie this site are not classified as expansive. No impacts couls occur. e) No Impact. Existing sewer lines would be used for the disposal of wastewater. As a result, septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems would not be used. Therefore, no impact with regard to the capability of soils to adequately support the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would result. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 53 3.7 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? □ □ □ b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. Climate change is the distinct change in measures of climate for a long period of time.14 Climate change can result from natural processes and from human activities. Natural changes in the climate can be caused by indirect processes such as changes in the Earth’s orbit around the Sun or direct changes within the climate system itself (i.e. changes in ocean circulation). Human activities can affect the atmosphere through emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and changes to the planet’s surface. Greenhouse gases differ from other emissions in that they contribute to the “greenhouse effect”. The greenhouse effect is a natural occurrence that helps regulate the temperature of the planet. The majority of radiation from the Sun hits the Earth’s surface and warms it. The surface in turn radiates heat back towards the atmosphere, known as infrared radiation. Gases and clouds in the atmosphere trap and prevent some of this heat from escaping back into space and re-radiate it in all directions. This process is essential to supporting life on Earth because it keeps the planet approximately 60° F warmer than without it. Emissions from human activities since the beginning of the industrial revolution (approximately 150 years) are adding to the natural greenhouse effect by increasing the gases in the atmosphere that trap heat, thereby contributing to an average increase in the Earth’s temperature. Greenhouse gases (GHGs) occur naturally and from human activities. Greenhouse gases produced by human activities include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since 1750, it is estimated that the concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere have increased over 36 percent, 148 percent, and 18 percent, respectively, primarily due to human activity. Emissions of greenhouse gases affect the atmosphere directly by changing its chemical composition while changes to the land surface indirectly affect the atmosphere by changing the way the Earth absorbs gases from the atmosphere. GHG emissions for the project were quantified utilizing the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2011.1.1 to determine if the project could have a cumulatively considerable impact related to greenhouse gas emissions (see Appendix A, Air Quality Modeling Data). A numerical threshold for determining the significance of greenhouse gas emissions in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) has not officially been adopted by the South 14 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Frequently Asked Questions About Global Warming and Climate Change. Back to Basics. April 2009 Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 54 September 2011 Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). As an interim threshold based on guidance provided in the CAPCOA CEQA and Climate Change white paper, a non-zero threshold based on Approach 2 of the handbook will be used.15 Threshold 2.5 (Unit-Based Thresholds Based on Market Capture) establishes a numerical threshold based on capture of approximately 90 percent of emissions from future development. The latest threshold developed by SCAQMD using this method is 3,000 metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2E) per year for residential and commercial projects.16 This threshold is based on the review of 711 CEQA projects. Table 3.7.1 (Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory) summarizes annual greenhouse gas emissions from build-out of the proposed medical office building. The emissions inventory accounts for GHG emissions from construction activities and operational activities. Table 3.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory GHG Emissions (MT/YR) Source CO2 CH4 N2O TOTAL* Construction 2012 Demolition (Library Parking) 72.58 0.01 0.00 72.75 Paving (Library Parking) 21.57 0.00 0.00 21.65 Demolition (Building Site) 72.02 0.01 0.00 72.18 Site Clearing 18.62 0.00 0.00 18.67 Grading 72.72 0.00 0.00 72.84 Building Construction 470.58 0.04 0.00 471.59 2012 Total 728.09 0.06 0.00 729.68 2013 Building Construction 120.53 0.01 0.00 120.76 Paving (Building Parking) 21.53 0.00 0.00 21.60 Architectural Coating 3.65 0.00 0.00 3.66 2013 Total 145.71 0.01 0.00 146.02 Total Construction Emissions 873.8 0.07 0.00 875.7 30-Year Amortization 29.13 0.00 0.00 29.19 Operational Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 250.68 0.01 0.00 252.24 Mobile 1,116.55 0.05 0.00 1,117.51 Waste 67.30 3.98 0.00 150.83 Water 17.00 0.12 0.01 20.48 GRAND TOTAL 1,480.66 4.16 0.01 1,570.25 Source: Hogle-Ireland 2011 * MTCO2E/YR Note: Slight variations may occur due to rounding ^ Construction emissions amortized over 30-years Construction activities are short-term and cease to emit greenhouse gases upon completion, unlike operational emissions that are continuous year after year until 15 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. CEQA and Climate Change. January 2008 16 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group. Meeting # 15, Main Presentation. September 28, 2010 City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 55 operation of the use ceases. Because of this difference, SCAQMD recommends in its draft threshold to amortize construction emissions over a 30-year operational lifetime. This normalizes construction emissions so that they can be grouped with operational emissions in order to generate a precise project GHG inventory. Greenhouse gas emissions will not exceed the 3,000 MTCO2E threshold and therefore will not result in a significant impact. b) No Impact. The City of West Covina does not have any plans, policies, standards, or regulations related to climate change and GHG emissions. There are also no other government-adopted plans or regulatory programs in effect at this time that have established a specific performance standard to reduce GHG emissions from a single building project. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 56 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 57 3.8 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? □ □ □ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? □ □ □ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? □ □ □ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? □ □ □ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? □ □ □ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? □ □ □ g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? □ □ □ Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 58 September 2011 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? □ □ □ a) Less-Than-Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. During construction, there would be a minor level of transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes that are typical of medical office construction projects. This would include fuels and lubricants for construction machinery, coating materials, etc. Routine construction control measures and best management practices for hazardous materials storage, application, waste disposal, accident prevention and clean-up, etc. would be sufficient to reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Future tenants are expected to include mostly medical and other health care businesses, such as dentists, and possibly some other professional offices such as accountants, attorneys, financial services, miscellaneous consultants, etc. Most professional office- based businesses use minor amounts of hazardous materials for machinery such as ink and toners in photocopiers and printers and a variety of common cleaning agents used in building maintenance. Such activities would not result in significant impacts involving use, storage, transport or disposal of hazardous wastes and substances. Medical and dental businesses would also likely involve transport, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials that are commonly found in medical practices. These are controlled by a variety of existing federal and state regulations governing medical operations and the chemical substances used to test or treat patients. Each business that generates medical waste, for example, is governed by the provisions of the California Medical Waste Management Act (§117600-118360 of the California Health and Safety Code. Each business is obligated to comply with those regulations to ensure safe treatment, containment, storage and disposal of a variety of hazardous materials classified as medical waste. Given the relatively small sizes of the office spaces, only small quantities of medical wastes are anticipated and such ‘small generators.’ State permits are required for facilities that treat substantial quantities of medical wastes from off-site sources; such “off site medical waste treatment facilities” are not proposed by the project applicant and will be prohibited, with Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. The City Fire Department would be responsible for ensuring that any medical offices prepare, maintain and implement plans to properly store, dispose of and contain accidental spills of hazardous substances or wastes. This project would not allow any unique kinds of office tenants that could require exceptional levels of hazardous materials usage that would require some special permitting or some sort of unique liquid or solid waste disposal. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 Off-Site Medical Waste Treatment Facilities, as defined in the California Medical Waste Management Act, shall be prohibited. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 59 b) No Impact. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Appendix B) was conducted for this site 17 , which determined that there is no evidence of soil or groundwater contamination from hazardous substances or wastes from past or present land use activities. Routine construction practices include good housekeeping measures to prevent/contain/clean-up spills and contamination from fuels, solvents, concrete wastes and other waste materials. Routine contractor obligations include examination of soil materials as they are excavated to ensure that any contaminated materials are identified and properly disposed of. This project is not expected to result in accidental spills or other releases of harmful substances into the environment as a result of construction activities. c) No Impact. There are no schools within ¼ mile of the project site. As discussed in the response to item 3.8a, this project would not be occupied by businesses that could generate hazardous air emissions or involve handling of significant volumes of acutely hazardous or toxic materials. d) Less than Significant Impact. A search of various governmental databases and historical records that list sites known to contain hazardous substances or materials was conducted as part of the Phase I ESA for this project. The City-owned property that contains the civic center complex and the project site is listed as formerly or currently containing an underground storage tank (UST) with petroleum hydrocarbons and related hazardous materials and it is not identified as leaking. There is no indication the UST occurs within the proposed project site. Since all project-related excavation will be limited to the proposed building footprint and immediately surrounding area, and will not extend into adjacent parts of the civic center complex, no impacts associated with the UST are anticipated. e, f) No Impact. There are no public airports or private airstrips within two miles of the project site. g) No Impact. The project site is not identified as a location that is part of any emergency evacuation plan or any emergency response plan. Development of this project would not interefere with emergency management operations that may occur at City Hall at various times. h) No Impact. There are no wildlands or wildland fire hazards in this full urbanized area. 17 Quartech Consultants, Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Southeast Corner of Garvey Avenue and West Covina Parkway, APN: 8474-001-906, West Covina, California. May 4, 2011. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 60 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 61 3.9 – Hydrology and Water Quality Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? □ □ □ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? □ □ □ c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? □ □ □ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? □ □ □ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? □ □ □ f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? □ □ □ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? □ □ □ Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 62 September 2011 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? □ □ □ i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? □ □ □ j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? □ □ □ a) Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Construction Impacts A project would normally have a significant impact on surface water quality if discharges associated with the project would create pollution, contamination, or nuisance as defined in Section 13050 of the California Water Code (CWC) or that cause regulatory standards to be violated, as defined in the applicable National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit or Water Quality Control Plan for the receiving water body. For the purpose of this specific issue, a significant impact could occur if the Proposed Project would discharge water that does not meet the quality standards of the agencies which regulate surface water quality and water discharge into stormwater drainage systems. Significant impacts could also occur if the Proposed Project does not comply with all applicable regulations with regard to surface water quality as governed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). These regulations include compliance with the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements to reduce potential water quality impacts. Three general sources of potential short-term, construction-related stormwater pollution associated with the Proposed Project include: 1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing pollutants; 2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and 3) earth moving activities which, when not controlled, may generate soil erosion via storm runoff or mechanical equipment. As required under the NPDES, the Proposed Project applicant is responsible for preparing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to identify specific measures to prevent erosion and mitigate the inherent potential for sedimentation and other pollutants entering the stormwater system. The primary objective of the NPDES stormwater program requirements are to: 1) effectively prohibit non-storm water discharges, and 2) reduce the discharge of pollutants from storm water conveyance systems to the Maximum Extent Practicable (“MEP” statutory standard). The SWPPP would incorporate the required implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for erosion control and other measures to meet the NPDES requirements for storm water quality. Proposed BMPs include sand bags around the perimeter of grading activities, a stabilized construction entrance, a construction entrance tire wash, and a containment area for vehicle washing, fueling, and maintenance. Implementation of the BMPs identified in the SWPPP and compliance with the NPDES and City discharge requirements would ensure that the construction of the Proposed Project would not violate any water quality standards or discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. Mitigation City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 63 measures HWQ-1 thru HWQ-4 will also be implemented to ensure that the Proposed Project’s construction-related water quality impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures HWQ-1 Appropriate erosion control and drainage devices shall be incorporated to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division, such as interceptor terraces, vee-channels, and inlet and outlet structures, as specified by Section 91.7013 of the Building Code. HWQ-2 Leaks, drips and spills shall be cleaned up immediately to prevent contaminated soil on paved surfaces that can be washed away into the storm drains. HWQ-3 Dumpsters shall be covered and maintained. Uncovered dumpster shall be placed under a roof or cover with tarps or plastic sheeting. HWQ-4 All vehicle/equipment maintenance, repair, and washing shall be conducted away from storm drains. All major repairs shall be conducted off-site. Drip pans or drop cloths shall be used to catch drips and spills. Long-Term Operational Impacts The proposed medical office building is not expected to generate hazardous wastewater that would require any special waste discharge permits. If any particular business involves some hazardous wastewater that must be disposed of off-site, it would be subject to individual compliance with the provisions of the California Medical Waste Management Act; no additional wastewater disposal facilities for such applications are proposed as part of this project. All wastewater associated with the building’s interior plumbing system is to be discharged into the local sewer system for treatment at the regional wastewater treatment plant. Runoff from the developed site would result in an increase in potential water contamination from urban pollutants that are commonly found in surface parking lots, ornamental landscape planters and from atmospheric buildup on rooftops. Project-related runoff will be similar in composition as the runoff from the existing civic center complex. Runoff from developed sites into the City’s municipal storm drainage system is subject to regulation under the City’s local standards for compliance with the countywide Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Program (SUSMP), enacted to implement the countywide MS- 4 Permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be prepared and approved by the City, to demonstrate how the site plan will capture and treat surface runoff sufficiently to avoid off-site water quality impacts. A key design criterion is to treat the first ¾-inch rainstorm flows, since the first rains typically carry the most concentrated levels of pollution that have built up since the last storm. A preliminary grading and drainage plan for this project has been prepared to address SWPPP requirements. It includes geotextile-lined infiltration trenches within parking area planters and along the Garvey Avenue frontage, where surface runoff will be conveyed to allow for filtering of potential water contaminants, prior to discharge into the City’s storm drainage system. This is expected to be sufficient to comply with SUSMP regulations. Additional mitigation measures HWQ-5 thru HWQ-10 will be implemented, to further reduce potential adverse impacts associated with developed site runoff. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 64 September 2011 Mitigation Measures HWQ-5 The project applicant shall implement stormwater BMPs to retain or treat runoff from a storm event producing ¾ inch of rainfall in a 24-hour period. The design of structural BMPs shall be in accordance with the Development Best Management Practices Handbook, Part B – Planning Activities. A signed certificate from a California Licensed civil engineer or licensed architect confirming the proposed BMPs meet this numerical threshold standard is required. HWQ-6 Post development peak stormwater runoff discharge rates shall not exceed the estimated pre-development rate for developments where the increase peak stormwater discharge rate will result in increased potential for downstream erosion. HWQ-7 All storm drain inlets and catch basins within, and immediately adjacent to the Project Site, as permitted and approved by the Department of Public Works, must be stenciled with prohibitive language (such as “NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO OCEAN”) and/or graphical icons to discourage illegal dumping. Legibility of stencil and signs must be maintained at all times. HWQ-8 Materials with the potential to contaminate stormwater must be : (s) placed in an enclosure such as, but not limited to, a cabinet, shed, or similar structure that prevents contact with runoff spillage to the stormwater conveyance system; or (2) protected by secondary containment structures such as berms, dikes, or curbs. HWQ-9 Storage areas shall be paved and sufficiently impervious to contain leaks and spills. HWQ-10 An efficient irrigation system shall be designed to minimize runoff, including: drip irrigation for shrubs to limit excessive spray; shutoff devices to prevent irrigation after significant precipitation; and flow reducers. b) Less than Significant Impact. Groundwater levels beneath the site are estimated to be more than 70 feet below the ground surface (below the flatter parts of the site), according to the geotechnical investigations conducted at the project site. Project-related grading would not reach these depths and no disturbance of groundwater is anticipated. The proposed building footprint area and paved parking areas will increase impervious surface coverage, thereby reducing the total amount of infiltration on site. Since this site is not managed for groundwater supplies, this change in infiltration would not have a significant effect on groundwater supplies or recharge. c) Less than Significant Impact. Surface runoff from the developed site will be directed into existing storm drains along Garvey Avenue and West Covina Parkway, after filtering through infiltration trenches. Existing drainage patterns will be altered to a minor degree. With more impervious surface coverage, the developed site would reduce the potential for erosion and sedimentation impacts compared to the current landscaped condition. The proposed landscape plan will provide sufficient stabilization of pervious areas so that erosion and sedimentation impacts will be negligible, if any. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 65 d) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed storm drainage system will result in minor changes in the existing site drainage pattern. It will be designed to prevent flooding on or off-site, in accordance with the City’s existing development standards. e) Less than Significant Impact. A hydrology study was prepared for this project (see Appendix C), which determined that the developed site runoff would be slightly less than the existing conditions runoff, due to incorporation of infiltration trenches as part of the project’s proposed drainage control plan. This project would not, therefore, increase the amount of site runoff into the City’s adjacent storm drain system. As explained in the earlier response to item a), with the required structural and non-structural water quality control measures required for compliance with the SUSMP, the developed site would not generate polluted runoff that would significantly impact the City’s storm drain system. f) No Impact. No water quality impacts beyond potential effects of site runoff during construction and in the developed condition have been identified. g) No Impact. This project proposes construction of a professional office building, with no housing. h) No Impact. The project site is not within a 100-year flood hazard zone (City of West Covina Hazard Mitigation Plan). i) No Impact. There is no threat of inundation due to failure of a dam or levee in this area (City of West Covina Hazard Mitigation Plan). j) Less than Significant Impact. The City’s Hazard Mitigation Plan indicates that there is a remote potential for inundation along the I-10 Freeway, in the event of a failure of the San Dimas Dam. This is not considered to be a significant risk to development along this freeway corridor and this project is not subject to any special design standards related to protection from a dam failure. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 66 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 67 3.10 – Land Use and Planning Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? □ □ □ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? □ □ □ c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? □ □ □ a) No Impact. Located at the western edge of a developed civic center complex, the project site is within a fully urbanized part of West Covina, where all basic structural elements of the community were established many years ago. All physical infrastructure required to support the proposed office building, i.e. streets, wet and dry utilities, energy and communications systems are present and within the immediate vicinity of this site. No off-site improvements would be necessary and this project would have no physical effect on the established community b) Less than Significant Impact. Development of a professional office building within the civic center area requires approval of an amendment to the West Covina General Plan Land Use Element, to change the site’s land use classification from Public Facilities to Neighborhood Commercial. A corresponding change in the site zoning from Public Building to Neighborhood Commercial is also required. This is considered a minor change in land use policy, which would not conflict with any plans or programs adopted to avoid or mitigate an environmental impact. The proposed site plan and architectural features are being designed to integrate harmoniously into the adjacent civic center complex. This includes vehicular and pedestrian connections, landscaping buffers and additional library parking conveniently located between the library and the police station. The integrity of the civic center will thus be preserved. c) No Impact. No habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan has been adopted within the fully urbanized project area. Since no Natural Community Conservation Plan or other conservation plan has been adopted for the area of the project, no conflict with such a plan would occur. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 68 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 69 3.11 – Mineral Resources Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? □ □ □ b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? □ □ □ a,b) No Impact. The Project site is not located within a mineral producing area as classified by the California Geological Survey (CGS). The project site is not located near any oil fields and no oil extraction and/or quarry activities have historically occurred on or are presently conducted at the project site. Additionally, the project site is not in any area identified by the City of West Covina as containing significant mineral deposits site that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 70 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 71 3.12 – Noise Would the project result in: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? □ □ □ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? □ □ □ c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? □ □ □ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? □ □ □ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? □ □ □ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? □ □ □ The proposed project is located in a fully urbanized area, in close proximity to the San Bernardino Freeway, and is surrounded by commercial uses. Existing noise conditions are representative of this environment. Traffic noise from the San Bernardino Freeway and off-ramps, West Covina Parkway, and W. Garvey Avenue are the greatest contributors to ambient noise levels near the project site. There are no discernable stationary noise sources within the area, as surrounding development generally consists of civic, retail, and commercial uses. There is one sensitive receptor just west of the project limits, the Doctor’s Hospital at 725 S. Orange Avenue, and another is the West Covina Library on the adjacent parcel to the south. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 72 September 2011 Project-related construction would result in short-term increases in noise levels on and immediately surrounding the project site. Project construction is anticipated to take approximately 13 months and is anticipated to be completed in February-March 2013. a) Less than Significant Impact. The project site is approximately 570 feet from the nearest residential zone, which is located on the opposite (north) side of the San Bernardino Freeway. The City’s Noise Ordinance does not specify restrictions for nonresidential areas of the City that are further than 500 feet from a residential zone. The City’s General Plan includes criteria for land use suitability, noting that ambient noise ranging from 66 to 75 CNEL dB(A) is considered normally unacceptable. The General Plan’s noise contours indicate that the project site is located within an area where ambient noise is approximately 70 CNEL dB(A).18 Utilization of minimum recommended building code specifications, including use of dual-glazed windows with a minimum standard transmission coefficient (STC) of 26 with closed windows would reduce the interior noise level of any building by 25 dB(A) CNEL when compared to exterior noise levels. Because outdoor uses are not associated with the office building and residential occupancies would be prohibited, the impact would be less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact. Groundborne vibration generated by construction projects is usually highest during pile driving, rock blasting, soil compacting, jack-hammering, and demolition-related activities. Next to pile driving, grading activity has the greatest potential for vibration impacts if large bulldozers or large trucks are used. Vibration from traffic related sources are generally not considered significant, except on severely damaged roadway segments. West Covina Parkway and W. Garvey Avenue are in good condition, and not considered damaged roadway segments that could cause vibration impacts. The preliminary geotechnical report prepared for this project (Quartech Consultants, April 18, 2011—see Appendix D) determined that would not require pile driving, rock blasting or other vibration intensive construction activities. Grading activities will utilize bulldozers and other heavy earthmoving equipment that might generate some groundborne noise and vibration. Vibration impacts to humans are generally limited to annoyance; however, excessive vibration can also damage buildings. Vibration attenuates rapidly with distance and therefore buildings in excess of 20 feet from heavy construction equipment would not be impacted. Vibration is readily perceptible by humans at 20 feet but ‘barely’ perceptible at 50 feet.19,20 Considering that all adjacent land uses are in excess of 50 feet of the portions of the site that would require grading activity, short-term vibration impacts from future grading activities will be less than significant. Medical, dental and miscellaneous professional office tenants typically do not conduct activities that would generate any groundborne noise or vibration and no such uses of this building are proposed. Long-term, operational groundborne noise or vibration impacts would be negligible and insignificant. c-d) Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated The proposed project has the potential to incrementally increase ambient noise levels during construction and operation, as discussed below. Construction Impact (Temporary or Periodic Increase in Ambient Noise): Less than 18 City of West Covina. General Plan-Noise Element. 1984. 19 Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. May 2006 20 California Department of Transportation. Transportation- and Construction-Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. June 2004 City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 73 Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporation. Construction of the proposed project would result in temporary increases in ambient noise levels on the project site and its surrounding area on an intermittent basis. The City’s Noise Ordinance prohibits the operation of construction equipment or any outside construction activities within a residential zone, or within 500 feet of a residential zone that would incrementally increase noise levels by five decibels or more at the property line between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. No residential zones are located within 500 feet of the property line of the project site; the nearest residential zones, located north of the San Bernardino Freeway, are approximately 570 feet away from the project site. Given that the project does not occur within 500 feet of a residential zone, and the existing high level of ambient noise associated with the nearby San Bernardino Freeway, the primary noise sensitive use near the project site is the West Covina Library. Since the City’s Noise Ordinance does not prescribe daytime limits on construction activities in nonresidential areas, there are no parameters to which this project must adhere. Given the project’s location adjacent to the library, temporary construction noise impacts could occur during daytime hours when the library is open. Noise levels affecting the library would be intermittent and would change at different times, based on the nature of the construction activities underway and the type and location of machinery being operated. Mitigation measures are recommended to reduce and minimize construction noise impacts at the library. Mitigation Measures N-1 During excavation and grading activities, construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturer’s standards. Construction contractors shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the West Covina Library, as feasible. N-2 Construction contractors shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and the West Covina Library during all project construction. Operations Impact (Permanent Increase in Ambient Noise): Less than Significant Impact. The City of West Covina Noise Ordinance generally prohibits noise sources that incrementally increase ambient sound levels by more than five decibels. The proposed project is located in a fully urbanized commercial area, adjacent to the San Bernardino Freeway, resulting in a higher than average ambient noise level. The proposed project, an office building with adjacent surface parking areas, does not propose any stationary noise sources that would substantially increase the ambient noise level. All office operations would be conducted indoors, and noise from those indoor activities would not be audible or would have a negligible effect on ambient noise levels at adjacent civic center land uses. The proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 2,000 daily vehicle trips. Generally, the noise source (i.e., traffic) needs to roughly double for noise increases to be noticeable (i.e., a three decibel increase). The estimated 2,000 daily vehicle trips that would be added to the surrounding streets are not anticipated to double the amount of traffic that currently exists on the roadway network surrounding the project site. As such, the net increase of trips that would be generated by the proposed project would not result Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 74 September 2011 in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the proposed project. e-f) No Impact. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, or in the vicinity of a private airstrip. The project is located approximately five miles from the El Monte Airport. There would be no impact with regard to airport/airstrip noise. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 75 3.13 – Population and Housing Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? □ □ □ b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? □ □ □ c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. Residential uses are not included in the proposed project; therefore, this project could not result in any direct residential growth. The project is indirectly bringing business to the area by constructing a medical building that will be available for businesses that elect to locate in the proposed building. At full occupancy, the proposed medical building could house more than 220 employees (assuming one employee/250 sf gross floor area), comprised of a mixture of part-time and full-time personnel. The business tenants could be any mixture of existing, local businesses, existing businesses located outside of West Covina but within a reasonable driving distance, and new businesses. It would be speculative to estimate how many future employees might relocate to the West Covina area as a result of working within the proposed office building. Due to the urban nature of the City and surrounding area, this potential minimal increase in population is expected to be accommodated by existing housing or possibly vacant properties designated by the General Plan for residential development. No new expanded infrastructure is proposed that could accommodate additional growth in the area that is not already possible with existing infrastructure. The proposed project would not result in potential growth inducing effects that were not anticipated in the City’s General Plan, and effects would be less than significant. b,c) No Impact. No occupied or unoccupied residences are currently located within the undeveloped project site. No impact will occur. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 76 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 77 3.14 – Public Services Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Fire protection? □ □ □ b) Police protection? □ □ □ c) Schools? □ □ □ d) Parks? □ □ □ e) Other public facilities? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant. The West Covina Fire Department (WCFD) provides fire protection and emergency medical response services in the City of West Covina. The fire department includes 66 full time employees and 7 part-time employees.21 The project site is an infill site, located within the Station No. 1 response area. Station No. 1 is located at 819 S. Sunset Avenue, less than one-half of a mile south of the project site, a relatively short distance and within desired response time parameters. The West Covina Fire Department provides technical fire prevention activities by checking building construction plans to make sure all proposed building meet appropriate safety codes prior to construction. Fire inspectors perform plan review on all proposed fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems, and restaurant hood extinguishing system installation.22 WCFD would review site plans for the proposed project as part of the review process. The project is proposed adjacent to existing development and within close proximity to a fire station. Therefore, the project would not have a significant impact on fire response times and would not otherwise create a substantially greater need for fire protection services than already exists. No new or expanded fire protection facilities would be required as a result of this project. 21 City of West Covina. City of West Covina Adopted Budget FY 2010-2011. 22 West Covina Fire Department, Fire Prevention Bureau: Plan Checks. <http://www.westcovina.org/cityhall/fire/fpb/default.asp> Accessed March 23, 2011. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 78 September 2011 b) Less than Significant. The West Covina Police Department (WCPD) provides police protection services in the City of West Covina. In 2010, WCPD had an authorized full-time workforce of 112 sworn officers and 70 civilians.23 WCPD also has approximately 55 part- time staff, including crossing guards, reserve officers and clerical staff. WCPD staffs three major divisions: Patrol, Investigative, and Administrative Support.24 The WCPD Police Station is located at 1444 W. Garvey Avenue, on the parcel immediately adjacent to the project site and approximately 650 feet from the eastern edge of the project site. The proposed professional office building is not expected to result in any unique or more extensive crime problems that cannot be handled with the existing level of police resources. No new or expanded police facilities would need to be constructed as a result of this project. c) Less than Significant. As a medical office type of land use, this project would not have any residential population and would not generate any direct demand for school facilities. There is a small potential for a minor number of households with school-age children relocating to the West Covina area as a result of one of the household members taking a job here. This is not expected to result in a need to construct new or expand any existing school facilities and the project’s impact on local schools would be insignificant. d) Less than Significant. There is some possibility that some of the future employees might visit local parks during their lunch hour, or before or after shifts. It is considered highly unlikely that this would create a significant demand for additional park sites or improvements to existing ones. Project impacts to local or regional parks would be insignificant. e) Less than Significant. The proposed professional office project would have an insignificant effect on other public services, since it would not rely on any such services to conduct normal business operations. Existing library parking spaces to be removed and replaced with office and parking improvements will be replaced in a convenient part of the civic center complex. Project-related impacts to other public facilities, therefore, would be less than significant. 23 City of West Covina. City of West Covina Adopted Budget FY 2010-2011. 24 West Covina Police Department. <http://www.westcovina.org/cityhall/police/default.asp> Accessed March 23, 2011. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 79 3.15 – Recreation Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? □ □ □ b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? □ □ □ a) No Impact. The proposed professional office project would not increase use of existing recreational facilities, because employees, customers and vendors are not expected to combine a trip to a local park with a trip to this office site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated and no mitigation measures are needed. b) No Impact. The proposed professional office project would not require the construction or expansion of new recreational facilities or affect any existing recreation facilities. As such, no impact would occur. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 80 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 81 3.16 – Transportation and Traffic Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? □ □ □ b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? □ □ □ c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? □ □ □ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? □ □ □ e) Result in inadequate emergency access? □ □ □ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? □ □ □ Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 82 September 2011 a) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project will result in the addition of 2,000 total trips per day (in passenger car equivalents [PCE]) on roadways in the project vicinity. The traffic study prepared by KOA Corporation, dated August 3, 2011, (Appendix E) included traffic projections based on anticipated opening year (2011) conditions and “future” (2016) conditions. The following six area intersections were analyzed in the traffic study:  Pacific Ave. & Cameron Ave.  Pacific Ave. & I-10 Westbound on/off ramps-Garvey Ave. North  Pacific Ave.-West Covina Parkway & I-10 Eastbound on/off ramps-Garvey Ave. South  West Covina Parkway & Toluca Avenue  Sunset Ave. & West Covina Parkway  Sunset Ave. & Plaza Dr. Impacts to all intersections would result in LOS D or better for a.m. and p.m. peak hours, excluding Pacific Ave. & I-10 Westbound on/off ramps for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Existing conditions at this intersection are LOS E and the Future 2016 conditions with the project would result in LOS E for a.m. peak hour and LOS F for p.m. peak hour. This is further by Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU), which for existing conditions is 0.933 and 0.935 for a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively and for the Future 2016 conditions is 0.996 and 1.032 for a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively. The traffic study recommends that an additional northbound left-turn lane to the intersection be constructed, which would bring the LOS for a.m. and p.m. peak hours both to LOS E and ICU to 0.926 and 0.915 for a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively. This recommended improvement is included as Mitigation Measure T-1. In addition to the proposed improvements, the payment of standard traffic impact fees would diminish any incremental impacts on area roadways and intersections from the project. Therefore, incorporation of recommended improvements and payment of impact fees will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. This project will be subject to compliance with the City’s Transportation Demand Ordinance, which requires development projects over 50,000 square feet in size to provide:  Information on public transit, ridesharing, bicycle routes and facilities for carpoolers, vanpoolers, transit riders and bicyclists, pedestrians  At least 10% of employee parking must be located near the building entrances  Preferential parking for vanpoolers  Bicycle racks or other suitable bicycle parking facilities Mitigation Measure T-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the project shall fund construction of an additional northbound left turn lane at the intersection of Pacific Ave. and I-10 Westbound on/off ramps. This measure shall be reflected on construction drawings submitted to the City. b) Less than Significant Impact. Pursuant to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Congestion Management Plan (CMP), any project that adds 150 or more vehicle trips to freeway segments or 50 or more vehicle trips to roadway segments during peak hours. The nearest CMP freeway segment is the San Bernardino City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 83 Freeway (Interstate 10), located to the north of the project site, beyond W. Garvey Avenue.25 The San Bernardino Freeway has an entrance and exit ramp at the nearest intersection to the project site. Based on the results of the traffic study, this project would generate less than 150 total trips per peak hour on this freeway segment. The nearest CMP roadway segment is Azusa Avenue at Cameron Avenue and Azusa Avenue at Workman Avenue, both located approximately 2.0 miles to the east. It is not expected that 50 or more new trips per peak hour would be generated by the project. c) No Impact. The project is located approximately five miles from the El Monte Airport, a general aviation airport of approximately 100 acres with an aircraft runway limited to craft weighing less than 12,500 lbs. Private and business light single and multi-engine aircraft and helicopters account for the majority of activity.26 The project is an office building, which is not anticipated to draw regional air traffic or increase air travel demand. Furthermore, the proposed 71-feet maximum building height would not affect airport approach or departure spaces or any air traffic patterns. d) No Impact. The proposed project does not involve changes in the alignment of West Covina Parkway or West Garvey Avenue, the two streets that access the project site. No additional access driveways are proposed on West Covina Parkway. A new driveway will be provided from W. Garvey Avenue, north of the intersection of West Covina Parkway. It must be designed in accordance with the City’s standard public works specifications with respect to line-of-sight, distance from intersections, etc. and West Garvey Avenue. The proposed site plan indicates this driveway will have a clear line of sight looking west at 275 feet. The proposed building is set back from the property line nearest to West Garvey Avenue by at least 15 feet along the frontage. Ingress and egress will be provided from both access driveways, providing sufficient access to the site. This project will not result in a traffic safety hazard due to any design features. e) Less Than Significant Impact. Temporary impacts on local traffic flow and emergency access during construction will be minimized through submittal and implementation of a construction traffic control plan, in accordance with the City's standard plan check and construction management procedures. Any potential temporary lane closures to adjacent streets would not substantially impact emergency access to the site because the site would still be accessible from the City Hall parking structure, accessed from further east on W. Garvey Avenue. The project proposes a 30 foot wide new access driveway on W. Garvey Avenue and will retain a 29 foot, seven inch wide driveway on West Covina Parkway. These widths are of sufficient length to provide access to fire and emergency vehicles and are consistent with the California Fire Code Standard 530.2.1 that requires a minimum width of 20 feet. All portions of the proposed office building are accessible within 150 feet of a fire hydrant or a drive aisle accessible by fire truck. This project would not result in adverse impacts on emergency access. f) No Impact. There are no bus stops located immediately adjacent to the project site. The nearest bus stop is located approximately 500 feet southeast along West Covina Parkway, with local and regional transit service provided by Foothill Transit. There are no bicycle lanes or pedestrian facilities located immediately adjacent to the project site. The proposed project would not result in any changes to lane or street configuration of West Covina Parkway, W. Garvey Avenue, or to existing sidewalks that could affect performance or safety of alternative transportation facilities. No impact would occur. 25 Metropolitan Transportation Authority. 2010 Congestion Management Program. 26 Los Angele County Airport Land Use Commission. Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Plan. Adopted December 19, 1991. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 84 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 85 3.17 – Utilities and Service Systems Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? □ □ □ b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? □ □ □ c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? □ □ □ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? □ □ □ e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? □ □ □ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? □ □ □ g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? □ □ □ Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 86 September 2011 a) Less Than Significant Impact. All wastewater generated by the interior plumbing system will be discharged into the local sewer main and conveyed for treatment at the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County’s San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant, located near the City of Industry. This treatment facility has a capacity of treating 100 million gallons/day (mgd), and currently handles approximately 78.6 mgd. Wastewater flows will consist of the same kinds of substances typically generated by office buildings and no modifications to any existing wastewater treatment systems or construction of any new ones would be needed to treat this project’s wastewater. The Districts estimated wastewater generated by the proposed medical building at approximately 16,500 gallons per day (gpd).27 This volume represents .017% of the WRP’s 100 mgd total treatment capacity, and 0.077% of the remaining capacity. This project would thus have a less than significant impact on the ability of the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant to operate within its established wastewater treatment requirements, which are enforced via the facility’s NPDES permit authorized by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact related to wastewater treatment requirements of the LARWQCB. b) Less than Significant Impact. Suburban Water System, a division of the Southwest Water Company, would supply water to the project. Suburban Water Systems currently serves a population of approximately 300,000 persons and receives wholesale water supplies from the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District (USGVMWD). (http://www.swwc.com/suburban). The USGVMWD is in turn a member of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which provides the USGVMWD with approximately 20 percent of its water supply. The remaining water supply is supplied locally through groundwater supplies. Sections 10910-10915 of the State Water Code requires the preparation of a water supply assessment (WSA) demonstrating sufficient water supplies for any subdivision that involves the construction of more than 500 dwelling units, or the equivalent thereof. As the project is below the established thresholds, no WSA is required. Regarding wastewater facilities, as discussed in the preceding response, wastewater generated at the project site is treated at the San Jose Water Reclamation Plant. The proposed project is estimated to have a wastewater generation of approximately 16,500 gpd gallons per day. This generation is well within the existing remaining treatment capacity of the San Jose Water Reclamation Plant, comprising .08 percent of the total remaining capacity. Connections to local water and sewer mains would involve temporary and less than significant construction impacts that would occur in conjunction with other on-site improvements. Upgrades to the local sewer main in West Covina Parkway, or possibly downstream of that, might be necessary to handle the increased wastewater flows from this project, if the affected local lines are already flowing at capacity. A sewer flow monitoring study will be performed to determine that and if there are some capacity deficiencies, this project will construct the necessary sewer improvements. Such improvements would involve typical short-term construction impacts for this type of work, including potential traffic lane closures, while streets are cut open and new sewer improvements are installed underground, followed by re-paving of affected street segments. With routine control measures, including temporary traffic detours, use of flagmen, etc. these construction impacts would be less than significant and emergency vehicle access will be ensured at all times. Similarly, construction of a new water main or modifications to the existing main in Garvey Avenue might be needed to provide the required volume and pressure to meet fire department specifications. If so, this would 27 County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Letter to Hogle-Ireland, Inc. June 2, 2011. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 87 result in temporary construction impacts (estimated at one-two weeks duration) along the affected roadway segment, to cut into the pavement, establish trenches, install pipeline, stage equipment and materials, etc. This construction might include temporary closure of one or more lanes of through traffic. Routine traffic construction control measures will be implemented to ensure that through traffic is maintained and emergency access to the civic center site and other properties adjacent to West Covina Parkway and/or Garvey Avenue are not affected by water main construction. Construction control measures associated with possible off-site water and sewer improvements will be included in final plans that are subject to City approval, and the control measures will be observed for full compliance in the field, by the City’s Public Works Inspectors. c) Less than Significant Impact. New underground and surface level drainage facilities would be constructed as part of the proposed site improvements. Runoff would be discharged into adjacent municipal storm drains along the two street frontages. A hydrology study prepared for this project (Appendix C) determined that the developed site would not increase the volume of runoff entering the municipal storm drain system. Physical modifications to the existing municipal drainage facilities, therefore, would not be required. d) Less than Significant Impact. Water demand associated with the proposed office building might be higher than the existing demand associated with irrigation of the on-site landscaping. The office building water demand could fluctuate over time, depending on the mix of tenants and the level of vacancy. Potable water would be consumed for interior plumbing devices as well as outdoor irrigation. The level of water demand for this project can be accommodated through existing water supply entitlements administered through the City’s water purveyor, Suburban Water Systems.28. No new water supply sources or entitlements would be required to meet this project’s water needs. e) Less than Significant Impact. Correspondence from the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County determined that the additional wastewater generation from this project would not exceed the capacity of the District’s regional sewer network or its wastewater treatment plant. 29 f) Less than Significant Impact. Regional landfill capacity fluctuates daily and is regularly monitored by the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County to ensure there is sufficient landfill space available to dispose of municipal solid wastes throughout the San Gabriel Valley. This project’s additional solid waste stream would have a less than significant impact on regional landfill capacity. All tenants would be required to dispose of their solid wastes in accordance with the citywide commercial waste disposal program, including any requirements for recycling or other methods of diverting wastes from landfills. The City contracts with Athens Disposal for waste collection and disposal services. Athens transports citywide wastes to a Materials Recovery Facility in Industry, where recyclable materials are sorted and removed from the wastes delivered to landfills, for sale to companies that use these recovered materials to manufacture a variety of products. In 2003, approximately 58% of the City’s total waste stream was recycled and diverted from landfill disposal. g) No Impact. Solid wastes generated by the proposed medical building would consist of municipal solid wastes typical of professional offices, i.e. paper, cardboard, plastics, glass, 28 Craig D. Gott, P.E., Vice President, Engineering, Suburban Water Systems. Communication with Randy Nichols, Hogle-Ireland, Inc. June 1, 2011. 29 County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Letter to Hogle-Ireland, Inc. June 2, 2011. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 88 September 2011 metals, food wastes, as well as small volumes of common hazardous chemical substances such as those found in cleaning products, along with ink cartridges and toners used in computer equipment. Disposal of such typical wastes would not require any unique waste disposal methods. As discussed in the response to item 3.7a, any future tenants that generate hazardous medical wastes are responsible for proper disposal of those wastes, pursuant to the provisions of the California Medical Waste Management Act. Compliance with that Act is administered by the State of California. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 will prohibit the establishment of any businesses engaged in treatment of off-site medical wastes. Violations of solid waste regulations are not anticipated as a result of this project. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 89 3.18 – Mandatory Findings of Significance Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? □ □ □ b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? □ □ □ c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. As discussed in the responses to items 3.4, there are no sensitive biological resources on this fully disturbed site that has been covered with ornamental landscaping for several years, and is within a fully urbanized area with no natural habitat. Since most of the site consists of fill materials placed during development of the adjacent civic center complex, it is considered unlikely that any prehistoric cultural resources or paleontologic resources could be encountered during project-related excavation activities. This site is not known to have any association with an important example of California’s history or prehistory. Based on the preceding analysis of potential impacts in the responses to items 3.1 thru 3.17, there is no evidence that this project would degrade the quality of the environment. b) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Cumulative impacts can result from the interactions of environmental changes resulting from one proposed project with changes resulting from other past, present and future projects that affect the same resources, utilities and infrastructure systems, public services, transportation network elements, air basin, watershed, etc. Such impacts cold be short-term and temporary, usually consisting of overlapping construction impacts, as well as long term, due to the permanent land uses changes involved in the projects. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 90 September 2011 To assess potential cumulative impacts associated with this project, an inventory of other proposed development and infrastructure projects, including transportation system improvements was compiled. Other projects currently being planned to occur within the same approximate time frame as the proposed project are identified below. Table 3.18.1 Other Planned/Pending Projects for Cumulative Impact Consideration Project/Location Characteristics Estimated Time Frames 1. Specific Plan for 6.8 acres at 301 S. Glendora Avenue, West Covina Demolish 122,645 sf building, construct 20,000 square feet of ground floor retail and up to 412 dwelling units Start construction May 2012, complete and open mid-2013 2. Imaging lab business at 1700 W. Covina Parkway Demolish existing structure, construct new 9,308 sf structure to house an imaging lab business Start construction early 2012, complete and open in mid- 2012 3. I-10 Freeway Improvements, between Pacific Ave./Sunset Ave. and SR-57 Add HOV lanes on both sides of the freeway Construction to begin late 2012, completed in Spring 2013 Source: City of West Covina Planning Department, July 2011 The first project is located approximately one mile east of the project site, with adjacent freeway access from the I-10/Vincent Avenue interchange. Given this separation between the two sites, temporary construction impacts would not overlap in any significant way. Also, given the direct convenience of vehicular access at the I-10/Vincent Avenue interchange, traffic impacts from this project are expected to interact to a negligible level with the impacts of the proposed project at the I-10/W. Pacific-W. Covina Parkway Interchange, which would provide direct freeway access for the proposed project. Over the long-term, there could be some cumulative impact combined with the proposed project, on traffic conditions along West Covina Parkway, between Sunset and Glendora Avenues, since this segment of West Covina Parkway would likely carry traffic to and from both sites. The traffic study for the proposed project accounts for additional traffic from the project proposed at 301 S. Glendora, and it was determined that future traffic volumes would not exceed the City’s level of service standards. Project number 2 would occur on the site of an existing commercial building located along the west side of West Covina Parkway, opposite the proposed project site. Since this would involve demolition of an existing building and construction of a comparably sized one within an already developed commercial site, no significant construction phase cumulative impacts are anticipated. Traffic associated with the re-occupancy of this building with the imaging lab was accounted for in the traffic study for the proposed project, and the traffic study. As discussed in the response to Checklist item 3.15b, cumulative traffic impacts would be significant at the I-605/Pacific Avenue interchange, and Mitigation Measure TR-1 will be implemented to increase traffic capacity for the significantly impacted lane movements. Caltrans is planning to construct High-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane improvements planned along the I-10 Freeway, from Puente Avenue to Citrus Street, commencing late in 2012, with completion targeted by Spring 2013. Some of that work could occur during the same time that the proposed project is under construction. As part of that freeway work, Pacific Avenue will be lowered beneath the freeway bridge, and there will be some City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 91 modifications to the northern side of Garvey Avenue, plus construction of a four-foot wide sidewalk along the south side of Garvey Avenue, adjacent to the project site. The City’s specifications for street frontage improvements in this area call for a nine-feet wide sidewalk, and tree wells. If the proposed project construction occurs after Caltrans constructs the four-foot sidewalk along the Garvey Avenue frontage, that sidewalk may need to be demolished and replaced when the proposed project constructs improvements along that frontage. This would not be considered a significant impact; however, construction of the full sidewalk improvements to City standards during a single construction phase is preferred. To ensure that the sidewalk construction along the project site’s Garvey Avenue frontage is properly coordinated with work on the proposed office project, Mitigation Measure M-1 will be implemented. Mitigation Measure M-1 The project’s final site plan shall incorporate a sidewalk and tree wells along the Garvey Avenue frontage, in accordance with the City’s street improvement specifications, and if practical, this sidewalk construction will be coordinated with the Caltrans work related to the I-10 HOV Lane improvements that includes a portion of this sidewalk, so that these Garvey Avenue frontage improvements only need to occur once. c) Less than Significant Impact. Based on the analysis of the project’s impacts in the responses to items 3.1 thru 3.17, there is no indication that this project could result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. While there would be a variety of temporary adverse effects during construction (noise, dust and gaseous emissions, possible temporary traffic lane closures), these would be minimized to acceptable levels through routine construction control measures. Adverse long-term impacts would include increased vehicular traffic that would add to potential congestion at nearby intersections; however, the applicable system performance standards would be maintained, with project- related mitigation. With increased traffic, vehicular emissions would also increase, as would roadway traffic noise, with a majority of these impacts affecting adjacent roadway segments and intersections. Projected emission levels would be below the thresholds of significance recommended by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Project- related traffic would represent a small percentage increase in traffic volumes along nearby roadways and would have a less than significant impact on roadway noise levels. Section 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 92 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 93 Section 4: References 4.1 – List of Preparers  Randy Nichols, Environmental Planning Director  Christopher Brown, Senior Environmental Planner  Genevieve Sharrow, Associate Project Manager II  Russell Brady, Associate Project Manager II 4.2 – Persons and Organizations Consulted City of West Covina (Lead Agency)  Fabiola Wong, Senior Planner  Dave Nichols, Public Works Project Supervisor  Shannon Yauchzee, Public Works Director  Chris Freeland, Deputy City Manager  Oscar Caplin, Civil Engineering Associate CGM Development (Applicant)  Peichin Li, President  Johnny Hang, Project Manager KOA Corporation – Traffic Impact Analysis  Brian Marchetti, Project Manager Cal Land Engineering, Inc. (dba Quartech Consultants)  Geotechnical and Hydrology Studies, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 4.3 – Bibliography California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. CEQA and Climate Change. January 2008. California Air Resources Board. Air Quality Attainment Status. 2010 California Department of Conservation and California Geologic Survey, Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones. <http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/ap/pages/index.aspx> [Accessed March 22, 2011] California Department of Conservation and Seismic Hazards Zonation Program. Seismic Hazard Zone Maps. <http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/pdf/ozn_baldp.pdf> [Accessed March 22, 2011] California Department of Fish and Game. Natural Community Conservation Planning. <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/habcon/nccp/status/> [Accessed March 22, 2011] California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: Los Angeles County. <http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic/schwy.htm> [Accessed March 22, 2011] Section 4: References 94 September 2011 California Department of Transportation. Transportation‐ and Construction‐Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. June 2004. California Department of Water Resources. San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118. Updated February 27, 2004. City of West Covina. City of West Covina Adopted Budget FY 2010‐2011. 2010. City of West Covina. General Plan. Amended February 6, 1995. City of West Covina. General Plan‐Noise Element. 1984. City of West Covina. Zoning Code. [accessed April 2011] (no date listed for latest Zoning Code amendment) http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=11504&stateID=5&statename=California City of West Covina Fire Department, Fire Prevention Bureau: Plan Checks. <http://www.westcovina.org/cityhall/fire/fpb/default.asp> [Accessed March 23, 2011] City of West Covina Police Department. <http://www.westcovina.org/cityhall/police/default.asp> [Accessed March 23, 2011] Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. May 2006. Grant Architects. Tree Survey for Dynamic Tower at Civic Center. November 3, 2004. KOA Corporation. Traffic Impact Analysis. 2011 Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Commission. Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Plan. Adopted December 19, 1991. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. 2010 Congestion Management Program. 2010. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2007 Air Quality Management Plan Final Program Environmental Impact report. June 2007 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 1993 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group. Meeting # 15, Main Presentation. September 28, 2010 Southern California Association of Governments. Regional Transportation Plan. 2004 United States Army Corps of Engineers. National Inventory of Dams [accessed April 6, 2011] http://www.usace.army.mil/Library/Maps/Pages/NationalInventoryofDams.aspx United States Environmental Protection Agency. Frequently Asked Questions About Global Warming and Climate Change. Back to Basics. April 2009. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 95 United States Environmental Protection Agency. The Greenbook Nonattainment Areas. 2010. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species. <http://criticalhabitat.fws.gov/> [Accessed March 22, 2011] United States Fish & Wildlife Services. Habitat Conservation Plans: Regional Summary Report. <http://ecos.fws.gov/conserv_plans/servlet/gov.doi.hcp.servlets.PlanReport> [Accessed April 7, 2011] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory Wetlands Online Mapper. <http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html> [Accessed March 22, 2011] Section 4: References 96 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 97 Section 5: Summary of Mitigation Measures A-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the City Building Official shall verify that construction plans submitted by the project proponent reflect use of architectural coatings that include the following:  The content of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in proposed architectural coatings shall not exceed 50 g/l for interior applications.  The content of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in proposed architectural coatings shall not exceed 100 g/l for exterior applications. This measure shall be verified through standard building inspections in light of the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. A-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City Building Official shall verify that grading plans submitted by the project proponent identify the location where exported soil is to be transferred and that the identified location is 10 miles or less from the project site. This measure shall be verified in light of the performance standard that criteria pollutant emissions from soil hauling shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. B-1 If construction is to occur at any time between February 1st to August 31st, a qualified biologist shall visit the site at least 10 days prior to initiation of construction to determine whether migratory non-game native bird species are actively nesting. If no bird nests are detected during these surveys, then construction-related activities may proceed. If migratory non-game native bird nesting is confirmed, and/or adult special-status birds are found within the project site, construction shall be delayed until two weeks after the young have fledged, as confirmed by a qualified biologist. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. C-1 Prior to excavation and construction of the Project Site, the prime construction contractor(s) shall be cautioned on the legal and/or regulatory implications of knowingly destroying cultural resources or removing artifacts, human remains, bottles and other cultural materials from the Project Site. C-2 If potential archaeological materials are uncovered during grading or other earth moving activities, the contractor shall be required to halt work in the immediate area of the find, and to retain a professional archaeologist to examine the materials to determine whether it is a “unique archaeological resource” as defined in Section 21083.2(g) of the State CEQA Statues. If this determination is positive, the scientifically consequential information shall be fully recovered by the archaeologist. Work may continue outside of the area of the find; however, no further work shall occur in the immediate location of the find until all information recovery has been completed and a Section 5: Summary of Mitigation Measures 98 September 2011 report concerning it filed with the City Planning Department. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. C-3 If paleontological materials are uncovered during grading or other earth moving activities, the contractor shall be required to halt work in the immediate area of the find, and to retain a professional paleontologist to examine the materials to determine whether it is a significant paleontological resource. If this determination is positive, the scientifically consequential information shall be fully recovered by the paleontologist. Work may continue outside of the area of the find; however, no further work shall occur in the immediate location of the find until all information recovery has been completed and a report concerning it filed with the City Planning Department. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. C-4 If suspected human remains be encountered during grading or other earth moving activities, the contractor shall be required halt work in the immediate area of the find and to notify the County Coroner, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, who must then determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner, with the aid of a supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are or appear to be of a Native American, he/she shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission for further investigations and proper recovery of such remains, if necessary. The applicant shall bear the cost of implementing this mitigation. HAZ-1 Off-Site Medical Waste Treatment Facilities, as defined in the California Medical Waste Management Act, shall be prohibited. HWQ-1 Appropriate erosion control and drainage devices shall be incorporated to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division, such as interceptor terraces, vee-channels, and inlet and outlet structures, as specified by Section 91.7013 of the Building Code. HWQ-2 Leaks, drips and spills shall be cleaned up immediately to prevent contaminated soil on paved surfaces that can be washed away into the storm drains. HWQ-3 Dumpsters shall be covered and maintained. Uncovered dumpster shall be placed under a roof or cover with tarps or plastic sheeting. HWQ-4 All vehicle/equipment maintenance, repair, and washing shall be conducted away from storm drains. All major repairs shall be conducted off-site. Drip pans or drop cloths shall be used to catch drips and spills. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 99 HWQ-5 The project applicant shall implement stormwater BMPs to retain or treat runoff from a storm event producing ¾ inch of rainfall in a 24-hour period. The design of structural BMPs shall be in accordance with the Development Best Management Practices Handbook, Part B – Planning Activities. A signed certificate from a California Licensed civil engineer or licensed architect confirming the proposed BMPs meet this numerical threshold standard is required. HWQ-6 Post development peak stormwater runoff discharge rates shall not exceed the estimated pre-development rate for developments where the increase peak stormwater discharge rate will result in increased potential for downstream erosion. HWQ-7 All storm drain inlets and catch basins within, and immediately adjacent to the Project Site, as permitted and approved by the Department of Public Works, must be stenciled with prohibitive language (such as “NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO OCEAN”) and/or graphical icons to discourage illegal dumping. Legibility of stencil and signs must be maintained at all times. HWQ-8 Materials with the potential to contaminate stormwater must be : (s) placed in an enclosure such as, but not limited to, a cabinet, shed, or similar structure that prevents contact with runoff spillage to the stormwater conveyance system; or (2) protected by secondary containment structures such as berms, dikes, or curbs. HWQ-9 Storage areas shall be paved and sufficiently impervious to contain leaks and spills. HWQ-10 An efficient irrigation system shall be designed to minimize runoff, including: drip irrigation for shrubs to limit excessive spray; shutoff devices to prevent irrigation after significant precipitation; and flow reducers. N-1 During excavation and grading activities, construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturer’s standards. Construction contractors shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the West Covina Library, as feasible. N-2 Construction contractors shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and the West Covina Library during all project construction. T-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the project shall fund construction of an additional northbound left turn lane at the intersection of Pacific Ave. and I-10 Westbound on/off ramps. This measure shall be reflected on construction drawings submitted to the City. M-1 The project’s final site plan shall incorporate a sidewalk and tree wells along the Garvey Avenue frontage, in accordance with the City’s street improvement specifications, and if practical, this sidewalk construction will be coordinated with the Caltrans work related to the I-10 HOV Lane Section 5: Summary of Mitigation Measures 100 September 2011 improvements that includes a portion of this sidewalk, so that these Garvey Avenue frontage improvements only need to occur once. City of West Covina Initial Study for CGM Office Project 101 Appendix Materials A: Criteria Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculations B: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment C: Hydrology Study D: Preliminary Geotechnical Report E: Traffic Study Appendix Materials 102 September 2011 - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - APPENDIX A Criteria Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculations Project CharecteristicsProject DetailProject2926Name2926 Parkway Corporate CenterLocationSCAQMDWindspeed2.2Precipitation Frequency31Climate Zone9Land Use SettingUrbanOperational Year2014Total Population0Total Acerage3.53Utility InformationUtility CompanySouthern California EdisonCO2 Intensity Factor641.26CH4 intensity Factor0.029N2O Intensity Factor0.011Using Historical Data?0PollutantsROG1NOX1CO1SO21PM101PM2_51PM10_FUG1PM25_FUG1TOG0PB0CO2_BIO0CO2_NBIO0CO21CH41N2O1CO2E1Land Use AmountMetricAcresSquare Feet PopulationCommercialMedical Office Building30.7 1000sqft0.7521200ParkingParking Lot197 Space1.75764000ParkingParking Lot129 Space1.084718600000000000000000000000000000Construction EmissionsNameTypeStartEndWork Week Total daysPhaseDescription1 Demolition (Library Parking) Demolition2012/01/02 2012/01/27520 Demolish Existing Library Parking2 Library Parking Paving Paving2012/01/28 2012/02/22518 Pave County Library Parking3 Demolition (Building Site) Demolition2012/02/23 2012/03/21520 Demolish Existing On-Site Parking4Site PreparationSite Preparation 2012/03/22 2012/03/285505GradingGrading2012/03/29 2012/04/1851506 Building Construction Building Construction 2012/04/19 2013/03/06523007Building PavingPaving2013/03/07 2013/04/01518 Pave Building Parking8 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2013/04/02 2013/04/255180000 000 0 0000 000 0 0000 000 0 0000 000 0 0000 000 0 0EquipmentTypeQTYHoursHPLoadDemolition (Library Parking)Concrete/Industrial Saws18810.73Demolition (Library Parking)Excavators381570.57Demolition (Library Parking)Rubber Tired Dozers283580.59Library Parking PavingCement and Mortar Mixers2690.56Library Parking PavingPavers18890.62Library Parking PavingPaving Equipment26820.53Library Parking PavingRollers26840.56Library Parking PavingTractors/Loaders/Backhoes18750.55Demolition (Building Site)Concrete/Industrial Saws18810.73Demolition (Building Site)Excavators381570.57Demolition (Building Site)Rubber Tired Dozers283580.59Site PreparationRubber Tired Dozers383580.59Site PreparationTractors/Loaders/Backhoes48750.55GradingExcavators181570.57GradingGraders181620.61GradingRubber Tired Dozers183580.59GradingTractors/Loaders/Backhoes38750.55Building ConstructionCranes172080.43Building ConstructionForklifts381490.3Building ConstructionGenerator Sets18840.74Building ConstructionTractors/Loaders/Backhoes37750.55Building ConstructionWelders18460.45Building PavingCement and Mortar Mixers2690.56 Building PavingPavers18890.62Building PavingPaving Equipment26820.53Building PavingRollers26840.56Building PavingTractors/Loaders/Backhoes18750.55Architectural CoatingAir Compressors16780.48000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0Trips and VMTWorkerVendorHaulWorkerVenddorHaulWorkerVendorHaulDemolition (Library Parking)1507512.77.420 LD_MixHDT_Mix HHDTLibrary Parking Paving200012.77.420 LD_MixHDT_Mix HHDTDemolition (Building Site)1506012.77.420 LD_MixHDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation180012.77.420 LD_MixHDT_Mix HHDTGrading70207012.77.410 LD_MixHDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction6929012.77.420 LD_MixHDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Paving200012.77.420 LD_MixHDT_Mix HHDTArchitectural Coating140012.77.420 LD_MixHDT_Mix HHDT00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000On-Road DustWorkerVendorHaulRoad SiltSilt Content Moisture ContentVehicle WeightVehicle SpeedDemolition (Library Parking)1001001000.18.50.52.440Library Parking Paving1001001000.18.50.52.440Demolition (Building Site)1001001000.18.50.52.440Site Preparation1001001000.18.50.52.440Grading1001001000.18.50.52.440Building Construction1001001000.18.50.52.440Building Paving1001001000.18.50.52.440Architectural Coating1001001000.18.50.52.440000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000DemolitionMetricQTYDemolition (Library Parking) Ton of Debris756Demolition (Building Site)Ton of Debris604000000GradingImportExportMetricPhased?SpeedAcresBulldozingLoading Silt ContentSite Preparation00 Cubic Yards07.107.9126.9Grading020700 Cubic Yards07.13.537.9126.900000000000000000000Architectural CoatingStartEndInteriorAreaExteriorAreaInteriorArea ExteriorAreaArchitectural Coating2008/07/013000/12/31500100050263559100 87853000000000000000000000000000000000Paving Area0000Mobile SourcesVehicle TripsMetricWD_TRST_TRSU_TRHW_TLHS_TLHO_TLMedical Office Building1000sqft36.138.961.55000Parking LotSpace0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Medical Office Building1000sqftCC_TLCW_TLCNW_TLPR_TPDV_TPPB_TPParking LotSpace13.38.97.46030100013.38.97.40000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Medical Office Building1000sqftHW_TTPHS_TTPHO_TTPCC_TTPCW_TTPCNW_TTPParking LotSpace00051.429.619Moisture ContentResidentialNonresidentialTripsTrip LengthVechicle ClassPaved (%) 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Emissions FactorsEmissionTypeLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2MHDHHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHAFleetMix0.5064250.076650.2281290.1055310.0207780.0060630.014957 0.028787 0.001088 0.0017 0.00615 0.00091 0.00283ACH4_IDLEX00000.00150.00130.00090.1 0.0012 0 0 0.03 0ACH4_RUNEX0.010.020.020.030.020.010.010.04 0.02 0.05 0.22 0.03 0.03ACH4_STREX0.010.010.020.030.020.020.020.08 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.02 0.03ACO_IDLEX00000.210.180.1410.01 0.17 0 0 5.3 0ACO_RUNEX1.582.452.4132.631.482.374.28 2.73 8.19 30.48 6.39 6.57ACO_STREX3.454.314.836.25.813.975.4721.32 8.81 17.5 9.83 6.33 11.15ACO2_IDLEX00007.95888.461112.4701 1441.7937 11.1994 0 0 545.897 0ACO2_RUNEX355.1713443.8607460.123626.5782634.3301601.38191341.5306 1786.5437 1205.6695 2083.65 157.797 1387.32 731.1655ACO2_STREX66.507282.14985.0744116.604338.168731.598812.9035 14.5287 20.4486 45.8419 45.8025 17.2473 34.1499ANOX_IDLEX00000.010.040.1825.71 0.12 0 0 8.7 0ANOX_RUNEX0.130.220.280.381.242.335.219.29 3.35 14.53 1.15 9.53 1.6ANOX_STREX0.220.260.450.581.61.340.622.38 1.2 2.07 0.3 0.41 1.02APM10_IDLEX00000.00020.00050.00220.25 0.0014 0 0 0.11 0APM10_PMBW0.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.02 0.01 0.01 0.0063 0.01 0.01APM10_PMTW0.0080.0080.0080.0080.010.010.010.03 0.01 0.0092 0.004 0.01 0.01APM10_RUNEX0.010.010.030.030.010.020.150.44 0.08 0.23 0.02 0.38 0.01APM10_STREX0.00630.00750.010.010.00230.0020.0011 0.0017 0.002 0.0037 0.01 0.001 0.0008APM25_IDLEX00000.00020.00050.0020.23 0.0013 0 0 0.1 0APM25_PMBW0.00540.00540.00540.00540.00540.00540.00540.01 0.0054 0.0054 0.0027 0.0054 0.0054APM25_PMTW0.0020.0020.0020.0020.0030.0030.0030.0089 0.003 0.0023 0.001 0.003 0.003APM25_RUNEX0.010.010.020.020.010.010.140.4 0.08 0.21 0.02 0.35 0.01APM25_STREX0.00580.0070.010.010.00210.00190.0010.0015 0.0019 0.0035 0.0096 0.0009 0.0007AROG_DIURN0.090.090.090.10.00240.00160.0006 0.0008 0.0007 0.008 0.91 0.0073 1.37AROG_HTSK0.150.170.160.160.040.030.010.01 0.01 0.14 0.34 0.05 0.07AROG_IDLEX00000.030.030.022.27 0.02 0 0 0.73 0AROG_RESTL0.060.070.070.070.00080.00060.0003 0.0004 0.0003 0.0041 0.49 0.0028 0.5AROG_RUNEX0.040.080.060.10.190.130.170.83 0.16 1.09 2.96 0.54 0.21AROG_RUNLS0.0707050.1148240.120850.1171160.3630280.2402670.088932 0.010405 0.158594 0.03487 0.35821 0.04557 0.017529AROG_STREX0.270.310.360.540.480.370.391.41 0.55 1.32 2.15 0.45 0.66ASO2_IDLEX00000.00010.00010.00010.01 0.0001 0 0 0.0053 0ASO2_RUNEX0.00380.00470.00480.00650.00620.00590.010.01 0.01 0.02 0.0021 0.01 0.0072ASO2_STREX0.00070.00090.00090.00130.00050.00040.0002 0.0005 0.0003 0.0008 0.0007 0.0003 0.0005ATOG_DIURN0.090.090.090.10.00240.00160.0006 0.0008 0.0007 0.008 0.91 0.0073 1.37ATOG_HTSK0.150.170.160.160.040.030.010.01 0.01 0.14 0.34 0.05 0.07ATOG_IDLEX00000.030.030.022.59 0.02 0 0 0.8 0ATOG_RESTL0.060.070.070.070.00080.00060.0003 0.0004 0.0003 0.0041 0.49 0.0028 0.5ATOG_RUNEX0.060.10.090.130.210.150.20.94 0.19 1.2 3.23 0.6 0.25ATOG_RUNLS0.0707050.1148240.120850.1171160.3630280.2402670.088932 0.010405 0.158594 0.03487 0.35821 0.04557 0.017529ATOG_STREX0.290.330.390.580.520.390.421.51 0.59 1.41 2.31 0.48 0.71SFleetMix0.5064250.076650.2281290.1055310.0207780.0060630.014957 0.028787 0.001088 0.0017 0.00615 0.00091 0.00283SCH4_IDLEX00000.00150.00130.00090.09 0.0012 0 0 0.03 0SCH4_RUNEX0.010.020.020.030.020.010.010.04 0.02 0.05 0.21 0.03 0.03SCH4_STREX0.010.010.010.020.020.010.020.07 0.02 0.06 0.11 0.02 0.03SCO_IDLEX00000.210.180.147.28 0.17 0 0 5.3 0SCO_RUNEX1.762.652.663.282.681.52.384.3 2.77 8.24 28.91 6.36 6.68SCO_STREX2.623.33.674.724.523.124.4917.68 7.08 14.61 8.69 5.36 8.63SCO2_IDLEX00007.95888.461112.4701 1523.9526 11.1994 0 0 545.897 0SCO2_RUNEX379.1954472.1794490.0572667.436634.3301601.38191341.5306 1786.5437 1205.6695 2083.65 157.797 1387.32 731.1655SCO2_STREX66.507282.14985.0744116.604338.168731.598812.9035 14.5287 20.4486 45.8419 45.8025 17.2473 34.1499SNOX_IDLEX00000.010.040.1826.62 0.12 0 0 8.7 0SNOX_RUNEX0.120.210.270.361.222.325.199.29 3.32 14.45 1.09 9.5 1.56SNOX_STREX0.210.240.410.531.531.290.592.28 1.15 1.97 0.29 0.38 0.98SPM10_IDLEX00000.00020.00050.00220.21 0.0014 0 0 0.11 0SPM10_PMBW0.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.02 0.01 0.01 0.0063 0.01 0.01SPM10_PMTW0.0080.0080.0080.0080.010.010.010.03 0.01 0.0092 0.004 0.01 0.01SPM10_RUNEX0.010.010.030.030.010.020.150.44 0.08 0.23 0.02 0.38 0.01SPM10_STREX0.00630.00750.010.010.00230.0020.0011 0.0017 0.002 0.0037 0.01 0.001 0.0008SPM25_IDLEX00000.00020.00050.0020.19 0.0013 0 0 0.1 0SPM25_PMBW0.00540.00540.00540.00540.00540.00540.00540.01 0.0054 0.0054 0.0027 0.0054 0.0054SPM25_PMTW0.0020.0020.0020.0020.0030.0030.0030.0089 0.003 0.0023 0.001 0.003 0.003SPM25_RUNEX0.010.010.020.020.010.010.140.4 0.08 0.21 0.02 0.35 0.01SPM25_STREX0.00580.0070.010.010.00210.00190.0010.0015 0.0019 0.0035 0.0096 0.0009 0.0007SROG_DIURN0.160.180.180.180.00390.00260.0010.0013 0.0011 0.01 1.74 0.01 2.16SROG_HTSK0.170.180.180.180.040.030.010.02 0.01 0.15 0.42 0.05 0.08SROG_IDLEX00000.030.030.022.14 0.02 0 0 0.73 0SROG_RESTL0.10.120.120.120.00150.0010.0005 0.0007 0.0006 0.007 0.98 0.005 0.85SROG_RUNEX0.040.080.060.10.190.130.180.83 0.16 1.1 2.85 0.54 0.21SROG_RUNLS0.0678280.1086690.1139630.110680.3551210.2342080.08803 0.010465 0.15589 0.03294 0.33693 0.04209 0.017202SROG_STREX0.230.250.30.450.410.320.331.21 0.48 1.17 1.85 0.39 0.55SSO2_IDLEX00000.00010.00010.00010.01 0.0001 0 0 0.0053 0SSO2_RUNEX0.00410.0050.00510.00690.00620.00590.010.01 0.01 0.02 0.0021 0.01 0.0072SSO2_STREX0.00070.00090.00090.00130.00050.00040.0002 0.0004 0.0003 0.0007 0.0006 0.0003 0.0005STOG_DIURN0.160.180.180.180.00390.00260.0010.0013 0.0011 0.01 1.74 0.01 2.16STOG_HTSK0.170.180.180.180.040.030.010.02 0.01 0.15 0.42 0.05 0.08 STOG_IDLEX00000.030.030.022.43 0.02 0 0 0.8 0STOG_RESTL0.10.120.120.120.00150.0010.0005 0.0007 0.0006 0.007 0.98 0.005 0.85STOG_RUNEX0.060.110.090.140.220.150.20.94 0.19 1.22 3.12 0.6 0.25STOG_RUNLS0.0678280.1086690.1139630.110680.3551210.2342080.08803 0.010465 0.15589 0.03294 0.33693 0.04209 0.017202STOG_STREX0.240.270.320.480.440.340.361.3 0.51 1.25 1.99 0.41 0.59WFleetMix0.5064250.076650.2281290.1055310.0207780.0060630.014957 0.028787 0.001088 0.0017 0.00615 0.00091 0.00283WCH4_IDLEX00000.00150.00130.00090.11 0.0012 0 0 0.03 0WCH4_RUNEX0.010.020.020.030.020.010.010.04 0.02 0.05 0.22 0.03 0.03WCH4_STREX0.010.010.020.030.020.020.020.08 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.02 0.03WCO_IDLEX00000.210.180.1413.84 0.17 0 0 5.3 0WCO_RUNEX1.522.372.322.92.631.482.374.27 2.73 8.18 30.63 6.41 6.55WCO_STREX3.544.414.956.355.884.025.4921.37 8.85 17.61 9.87 6.62 11.16WCO2_IDLEX00007.95888.461112.4701 1326.7654 11.1994 0 0 545.897 0WCO2_RUNEX344.9962431.8929447.4756609.3308634.3301601.38191341.5306 1786.5437 1205.6695 2083.65 157.797 1387.32 731.1655WCO2_STREX66.507282.14985.0744116.604338.168731.598812.9035 14.5287 20.4486 45.8419 45.8025 17.2473 34.1499WNOX_IDLEX00000.010.040.1824.44 0.12 0 0 8.7 0WNOX_RUNEX0.140.240.310.421.352.495.589.92 3.62 15.56 1.29 10.18 1.76WNOX_STREX0.230.270.450.591.61.340.622.38 1.2 2.07 0.3 0.41 1.02WPM10_IDLEX00000.00020.00050.00220.3 0.0014 0 0 0.11 0WPM10_PMBW0.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.02 0.01 0.01 0.0063 0.01 0.01WPM10_PMTW0.0080.0080.0080.0080.010.010.010.03 0.01 0.0092 0.004 0.01 0.01WPM10_RUNEX0.010.010.030.030.010.020.150.44 0.08 0.23 0.02 0.38 0.01WPM10_STREX0.00630.00750.010.010.00230.0020.0011 0.0017 0.002 0.0037 0.01 0.001 0.0008WPM25_IDLEX00000.00020.00050.0020.28 0.0013 0 0 0.1 0WPM25_PMBW0.00540.00540.00540.00540.00540.00540.00540.01 0.0054 0.0054 0.0027 0.0054 0.0054WPM25_PMTW0.0020.0020.0020.0020.0030.0030.0030.0089 0.003 0.0023 0.001 0.003 0.003WPM25_RUNEX0.010.010.020.020.010.010.140.4 0.08 0.21 0.02 0.35 0.01WPM25_STREX0.00580.0070.010.010.00210.00190.0010.0015 0.0019 0.0035 0.0096 0.0009 0.0007WROG_DIURN0.10.110.110.110.00330.00220.00090.001 0.0009 0.01 1.19 0.01 1.89WROG_HTSK0.180.20.190.190.050.040.010.02 0.02 0.19 0.46 0.06 0.1WROG_IDLEX00000.030.030.022.47 0.02 0 0 0.73 0WROG_RESTL0.050.060.060.070.00080.00050.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0042 0.41 0.0028 0.49WROG_RUNEX0.040.080.060.10.190.130.170.83 0.16 1.08 2.98 0.54 0.21WROG_RUNLS0.0799280.1348220.1428840.1378580.3963010.2638020.094397 0.010925 0.169337 0.04066 0.42364 0.05365 0.018504WROG_STREX0.280.310.370.550.490.370.391.42 0.55 1.32 2.16 0.46 0.66WSO2_IDLEX00000.00010.00010.00010.01 0.0001 0 0 0.0053 0WSO2_RUNEX0.00370.00460.00460.00630.00620.00590.010.01 0.01 0.02 0.0021 0.01 0.0072WSO2_STREX0.00080.00090.0010.00130.00050.00040.0002 0.0005 0.0003 0.0008 0.0007 0.0003 0.0005WTOG_DIURN0.10.110.110.110.00330.00220.00090.001 0.0009 0.01 1.19 0.01 1.89WTOG_HTSK0.180.20.190.190.050.040.010.02 0.02 0.19 0.46 0.06 0.1WTOG_IDLEX00000.030.030.022.81 0.02 0 0 0.8 0WTOG_RESTL0.050.060.060.070.00080.00050.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0042 0.41 0.0028 0.49WTOG_RUNEX0.060.10.090.130.210.150.20.94 0.19 1.19 3.24 0.6 0.24WTOG_RUNLS0.0799280.1348220.1428840.1378580.3963010.2638020.094397 0.010925 0.169337 0.04066 0.42364 0.05365 0.018504WTOG_STREX0.30.330.390.590.520.40.421.52 0.59 1.42 2.33 0.5 0.71Paved (%)Silt LoadingSiltMoistureWeightSpeed1000.14.30.52.440Area SourcesWoodstovesConventionalCatalyticNoncatalyticPelletDaysMass000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000FireplacesWoodGasPropaneNoneHours/DayDays/syearMass0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Consumer Products0.0000198Architectural CoatingResidentialNonresidentialInteriorAreaExteriorAreaInteriorAreaExteriorAreaReapply (%)500100025059226025019742010LandscapingNumberSnowDaysNumberSummerDays0365Energy UseLand UseT24ENT24ELightingT24NGNT24NGMedical Office Building5.624.624.2910.540.39Parking Lot00000000000000000 000000000000000000000000Water and WastewaterIntensity FactorsLand UseMetricIndoor rateOutdoor Rate SupplySupply TreatDistributeWaste TreatSepticAerobicAnaerobic Digest CogenMedical Office Building1000sqft3852252.5733762.3897271111272191110 84.69 2.14 3.17 0Parking LotSpace0097271111272191110 84.69 2.14 3.17 000000 000 0 0 00000000 000 0 0 00000000 000 0 0 00000000 000 0 0 00000000 000 0 0 00000000 000 0 0 000Solid WasteLand UseMetricRateNo CaptureFlareEnergy RecoupMedical Office Building1000sqft331.566940Parking LotSpace06940000000000000000000000000000000000000Land Use ChangeLand UseVegetation TypeAcres BeginAcres End CO200000SequestrationBroadSpeciesClassNumberOfNewTreesCO2perTree000000000000000000MitigationConstructionConstMitigationEquipmentType FuelTypeTierNo.TotalDPFOxidationCatalystAir CompressorsDiesel00100Cement and Mortar MixersDiesel00400Concrete/Industrial SawsDiesel00200CranesDiesel00100ExcavatorsDiesel00700ForkliftsDiesel00300Generator SetsDiesel00100GradersDiesel00100PaversDiesel00200Paving EquipmentDiesel00400RollersDiesel00400Rubber Tired DozersDiesel00800Tractors/Loaders/BackhoesDiesel001200WeldersDiesel00100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Soil StabilizersPM10 ReductionPM2.5 Reduction000Ground CoverPM10 ReductionPM2.5 Reduction000WateringFrequencyPM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction0000Unpaved RoadsVehicle SpeedMoisture Content Speed0000 Road CleaningPM Reduction00Land Use and TrafficProjectSetting0Increase DensityDU/AcreJob/AcreIncrease Diversity0000Improve WalkabilityIntersectionsImprove Accessibility DistanceImprove TransitDistanceLow Income Homes DU00000000Improve Ped NetworkSelection00Traffic CalmingStreetsIntersectionsNEV network0000Limit parkingReductionUnbundle Costs CostOn-Street pricingIncrease000000BRT SystemLinesExpand TransitIncreaseIncrease FrequencyLevelReducction0000000Trip ReductionEmployee %Type000Transit SubsidyEmployee %Amount000Parking Cash OutEmployee %Parking ChargeEmployee % WorkplaceParkingChargeCost00000Encourage Telecommuting9-804-401/50000Market Trip ReductionEmployee %VanpoolPercent %Mode Share00002Ride SharingEmployee %School BusFamily %0000AreaLawnmowerElectric %LeafblowerElectric %ChainsawElectric %000000InteriorEFExteriorEFInteriorEFExteriorEF050010002500250Natural Gas HearthNo HearthLow VOC Cleaning000EnergyApplianceTypeLand UseImprovement %Exceed Title 24Improvement %Efficient Lighting Reduction %ClothWasher0300000DishWasher015Renewable EnergyKwhGeneratedCheckKwhGeneratedGenerated % Generated %Fan05000000 Refrigerator015WaterConservation StrategyIndoor ReductionOutdoor reduction000Reclaimed WaterOutdoorIndoorGrey Water OutdoorIndoor000000Low Flow WC FaucetReduction %Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Reduction %032018Low Flow ToileetReduction %Low Flow Shower Reduction %020020Turf ReductionAreaReduction %Efficient Irrigation Reduction %00006.1Efficient landscapeMAWAETWU000Solid WasteRecyclingReduction %00ResidentialNonresidential 1,451.53 4.16 0.00 1,541.060.07 0.09 20.48 Total 1.59 1.96 7.43 0.01 1.22 0.08 1.30 0.02 17.00 0.12 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00Water 67.30 3.98 0.00 150.830.00 0.00 1,117.51 Waste 0.00 0.00 1,116.55 0.05 0.000.02 0.07 0.090.01 1.22 0.08 1.30Mobile 0.75 1.93 7.41 250.68 0.01 0.00 252.240.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Area 0.84 0.00 0.00 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 879.48 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.01 0.12 0.48 0.59 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 877.59 0.08 0.000.05 0.48 0.53Total 1.79 7.88 5.56 145.71 0.01 0.00 146.020.08 0.08 733.46 2013 0.73 1.20 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 731.88 0.07 0.000.05 0.40 0.450.01 0.12 0.40 0.512012 1.06 6.68 4.63 Year tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 879.48 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.01 0.45 0.48 0.93 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 877.59 0.08 0.000.05 0.48 0.53Total 3.31 7.88 5.56 145.71 0.01 0.00 146.020.08 0.08 733.46 2013 2.25 1.20 0.93 0.00 0.03 0.08 0.11 0.00 731.88 0.07 0.000.05 0.40 0.45 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2012 1.06 6.68 4.63 0.01 0.42 0.40 0.82 SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OROG NOx CO Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Architectural Coating - Adjust VOC content for low VOC coatings Land Use Change - 2.0 Emissions Summary PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Off-road Equipment - Trips and VMT - Adjust Per Grading Inflation Factor Demolition - Grading - Adjust Lot Size Per Project Specifications Construction Phase - Adjust Activities Per Project Specifications Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Adjust Equipment Based on Changes in Grading Scheudle (Inflation Factor 0.53) 1.3 User Entered Comments 31 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Adjust Lot Acerage to Match Project Plans Climate Zone 9 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Southern California EdisonUrbanizationUrbanWind Speed (m/s) Parking Lot 129 Space 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Utility Company Medical Office Building 30.7 1000sqft Parking Lot 197 Space 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1 Date: 8/11/2011 2926 Parkway Corporate Center South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual 1 of 10 4.46 0.00 0.00 4.470.00 0.00 1.65 Total 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 2.82 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.81 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.02 0.01 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 68.28 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.05 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 68.12 0.01 0.000.00 0.04 0.04Total 0.09 0.75 0.44 68.12 0.01 0.00 68.280.04 0.04 0.00 Off-Road 0.09 0.75 0.44 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.01 0.00 0.01Fugitive Dust CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 4.46 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 4.470.00 0.00 1.65 Total 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.65 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 2.82 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.81 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.02 0.00 0.02Hauling 0.00 0.02 0.01 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 68.28 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.05 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 68.12 0.01 0.000.00 0.04 0.04Total 0.09 0.75 0.44 68.12 0.01 0.00 68.280.04 0.04 0.00 Off-Road 0.09 0.75 0.44 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.01 0.00 0.01Fugitive Dust Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total 3.2 Demolition (Library Parking) - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3.0 Construction Detail 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1,451.53 4.16 0.00 1,541.060.07 0.09 20.48 Total 1.59 1.96 7.43 0.01 1.22 0.08 1.30 0.02 17.00 0.12 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00Water 67.30 3.98 0.00 150.830.00 0.00 1,117.51 Waste 0.00 0.00 1,116.55 0.05 0.000.02 0.07 0.090.01 1.22 0.08 1.30Mobile 0.75 1.93 7.41 250.68 0.01 0.00 252.240.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Area 0.84 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG 2 of 10 68.280.00 0.01 0.04 0.05 68.12 0.01 0.000.00 0.04 0.04Total 0.09 0.75 0.44 68.12 0.01 0.00 68.280.04 0.04 0.00 Off-Road 0.09 0.75 0.44 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.01 0.00 0.01Fugitive Dust CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 3.90 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 3.900.00 0.00 1.65 Total 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 1.65 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 2.25 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.01 0.00 0.01Hauling 0.00 0.02 0.01 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 68.28 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.05 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 68.12 0.01 0.000.00 0.04 0.04Total 0.09 0.75 0.44 68.12 0.01 0.00 68.280.04 0.04 0.00 Off-Road 0.09 0.75 0.44 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.01 0.00 0.01Fugitive Dust CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 1.97 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.4 Demolition (Building Site) - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 1.980.00 0.00 1.98 Total 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 19.67 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.02 0.02 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 19.60 0.00 0.000.02 0.02Total 0.04 0.25 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 19.67 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.60 0.00 0.000.02 0.020.00 0.02 0.02Off-Road 0.04 0.25 0.15 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 1.97 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 1.980.00 0.00 1.98 Total 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 19.67 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.02 0.02 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 19.60 0.00 0.000.02 0.02Total 0.04 0.25 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 19.67 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.60 0.00 0.000.02 0.020.00 0.02 0.02Off-Road 0.04 0.25 0.15 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Library Parking Paving - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 3 of 10 40.88 0.00 0.00 40.910.01 0.01 0.58 Total 0.04 0.34 0.21 0.00 0.16 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 40.33 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.30 0.00 0.000.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.16 0.01 0.18Hauling 0.04 0.34 0.21 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 35.73 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 35.64 0.00 0.000.03 0.02 0.05Total 0.05 0.39 0.24 35.64 0.00 0.00 35.730.02 0.02 0.00 Off-Road 0.05 0.39 0.24 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.000.03 0.00 0.030.05 0.00 0.05Fugitive Dust CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.49 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.6 Grading - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 0.490.00 0.00 0.49 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 18.18 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 18.13 0.00 0.000.02 0.01 0.03Total 0.03 0.21 0.12 18.13 0.00 0.00 18.180.01 0.01 0.00 Off-Road 0.03 0.21 0.12 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.000.02 0.00 0.020.05 0.00 0.05Fugitive Dust CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.49 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 0.490.00 0.00 0.49 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 18.18 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.06 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 18.13 0.00 0.000.02 0.01 0.03Total 0.03 0.21 0.12 18.13 0.00 0.00 18.180.01 0.01 0.00 Off-Road 0.03 0.21 0.12 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.000.02 0.00 0.020.05 0.00 0.05Fugitive Dust CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 3.90 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Site Preparation - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 3.900.00 0.00 1.65 Total 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 2.25 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.02 0.01 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 4 of 10 86.12 0.01 0.00 86.320.05 0.05 86.32 Total 0.12 0.81 0.55 0.00 0.05 0.05 86.12 0.01 0.000.05 0.050.00 0.05 0.05Off-Road 0.12 0.81 0.55 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 135.27 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 135.400.02 0.02 69.33 Total 0.18 0.53 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.00 69.24 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.01Worker 0.13 0.05 0.49 66.03 0.00 0.00 66.070.02 0.02 0.00 Vendor 0.05 0.48 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 335.31 0.04 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG 0.00 336.190.23 0.23 336.19 Total 0.51 3.42 2.17 0.00 0.23 0.23 335.31 0.04 0.000.23 0.230.00 0.23 0.23Off-Road 0.51 3.42 2.17 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 135.27 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 135.400.02 0.02 69.33 Total 0.18 0.53 0.79 0.00 0.11 0.02 0.13 0.00 69.24 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.09 0.00 0.09Worker 0.13 0.05 0.49 66.03 0.00 0.00 66.070.02 0.02 0.00 Vendor 0.05 0.48 0.30 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 335.31 0.04 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG 0.00 336.190.23 0.23 336.19 Total 0.51 3.42 2.17 0.00 0.23 0.23 335.31 0.04 0.000.23 0.230.00 0.23 0.23Off-Road 0.51 3.42 2.17 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 40.88 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 40.910.01 0.01 0.58 Total 0.04 0.34 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 40.33 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.30 0.00 0.000.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.00 0.01 0.02Hauling 0.04 0.34 0.21 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 35.73 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 35.64 0.00 0.000.03 0.02 0.05Total 0.05 0.39 0.24 35.64 0.00 0.00 35.730.02 0.02 0.00 Off-Road 0.05 0.39 0.24 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.000.03 0.00 0.030.05 0.00 0.05Fugitive Dust CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 5 of 10 1.93 0.00 0.00 1.940.00 0.00 1.94 Total 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.93 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 19.66 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.02 0.02 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 19.60 0.00 0.000.02 0.02Total 0.04 0.24 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 19.66 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.60 0.00 0.000.02 0.020.00 0.02 0.02Off-Road 0.04 0.24 0.15 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 1.93 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 1.940.00 0.00 1.94 Total 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.93 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 19.66 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.02 0.02 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 19.60 0.00 0.000.02 0.02Total 0.04 0.24 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 19.66 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.60 0.00 0.000.02 0.020.00 0.02 0.02Off-Road 0.04 0.24 0.15 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 34.41 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.8 Building Paving - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 34.440.00 0.00 17.44 Total 0.04 0.12 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.42 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.03 0.01 0.11 16.99 0.00 0.00 17.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.01 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 86.12 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG 0.00 86.320.05 0.05 86.32 Total 0.12 0.81 0.55 0.00 0.05 0.05 86.12 0.01 0.000.05 0.050.00 0.05 0.05Off-Road 0.12 0.81 0.55 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 34.41 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 34.440.00 0.00 17.44 Total 0.04 0.12 0.18 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 17.42 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.02 0.00 0.02Worker 0.03 0.01 0.11 16.99 0.00 0.00 17.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.01 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG 6 of 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 8.90 13.30 7.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 8.90 13.30 7.40 H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Medical Office Building 8.90 13.30 7.40 29.60 51.40 19.00 Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW 2,243,504 2,243,504 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Total 1,109.19 275.07 47.59 Parking Lot 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Annual VMT 2,243,504 2,243,504Medical Office Building 1,109.19 275.07 47.59 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday NA 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated NA NA NA NANA NA NA NANA NA NA NATotal NA NA NA 1,116.55 0.05 0.00 1,117.510.07 0.09 1,117.51 Unmitigated 0.75 1.93 7.41 0.01 1.22 0.08 1.30 0.02 1,116.55 0.05 0.000.02 0.07 0.090.01 1.22 0.08 1.30Mitigated 0.75 1.93 7.41 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 TotalROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1.35 0.00 0.00 1.360.00 0.00 1.36 Total 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 2.30 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2.30 0.00 0.000.00 0.00Total 0.51 0.03 0.02 2.30 0.00 0.00 2.300.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00Archit. Coating 0.51 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 1.35 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 0.00 1.360.00 0.00 1.36 Total 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Worker 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 2.30 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2.30 0.00 0.000.00 0.00Total 2.03 0.03 0.02 2.30 0.00 0.00 2.300.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00Archit. Coating 2.03 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.9 Architectural Coating - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 7 of 10 NANANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NATotal NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Unmitigated 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Mitigated 0.84 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 TotalROG NOx CO 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 0.00 221.66 6.0 Area Detail 0.00 0.00 Total 220.28 0.01 0.00 221.66 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 220.28 0.01Medical Office Building 757304 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh tons/yr MT/yr CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4Electricity Use ROG NOx 0.00 221.66 Mitigated 0.00 0.00 Total 220.28 0.01 0.00 221.66 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 220.28 0.01Medical Office Building 757304 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh tons/yr MT/yr CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4Electricity Use ROG NOx 30.40 0.000.00 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 30.58Total 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.58 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.40 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.02 0.00 0.00Medical Office Building 569672 0.00 0.03 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10NaturalGas Use ROG NOx 30.40 0.000.00 Mitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 30.58Total 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.58 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.40 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.02 0.00 0.00Medical Office Building 569672 0.00 0.03 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NA 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 NA NA NA NANA NA NA NANA NA NA NATotal NA NA NA 30.40 0.00 0.00 30.580.00 0.00 30.58 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.40 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00NaturalGas Mitigated 0.00 0.03 0.02 220.28 0.01 0.00 221.660.00 0.00 221.66 Electricity Unmitigated 0.00 0.00 220.28 0.01 0.000.00 0.00 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Electricity Mitigated 0.00 0.00 SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OROG NOx CO Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 8 of 10 NANA NA NA NATotal NA NA NA 150.83 Unmitigated 67.30 3.98 0.00 150.83 67.30 3.98 0.00 Mitigated tons/yr MT/yr SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OROG NOx CO 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year CO2e 0.00 20.48 8.0 Waste Detail 0.00 0.00 Total 17.00 0.12 0.00 20.48 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.00 0.00 17.00 0.12Medical Office Building 3.85225 / 0.733762 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal tons/yr MT/yr CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4Indoor/Outdoor Use ROG NOx 0.00 20.48 Mitigated 0.00 0.00 Total 17.00 0.12 0.00 20.48 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.00 0.00 17.00 0.12Medical Office Building 3.85225 / 0.733762 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal tons/yr MT/yr NA 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Outdoor Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 NA NA NA NATotal NA NA NA 20.48 Unmitigated 17.00 0.12 0.00 20.48 17.00 0.12 0.00Mitigated CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00Architectural Coating 0.20 CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.00 0.00 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated ROG 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00Architectural Coating 0.20 SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 9 of 10 0.00 150.83 9.0 Vegetation 0.00 0.00 Total 67.30 3.98 0.00 150.83 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 67.30 3.98Medical Office Building 331.56 N2O CO2e Land Use tons tons/yr MT/yr CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4Waste Disposed ROG NOx 0.00 150.83 Mitigated 0.00 0.00 Total 67.30 3.98 0.00 150.83 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 67.30 3.98Medical Office Building 331.56 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons tons/yr MT/yr 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 10 of 10 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1 Date: 8/11/2011 2926 Parkway Corporate Center South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Medical Office Building 30.7 1000sqft Parking Lot 197 Space Parking Lot 129 Space 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California EdisonUrbanizationUrbanWind Speed (m/s) Climate Zone 9 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 1.3 User Entered Comments 31 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Adjust Lot Acerage to Match Project Plans Construction Phase - Adjust Activities Per Project Specifications Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Adjust Equipment Based on Changes in Grading Scheudle (Inflation Factor 0.53) Off-road Equipment - Trips and VMT - Adjust Per Grading Inflation Factor Demolition - Grading - Adjust Lot Size Per Project Specifications Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Architectural Coating - Adjust VOC content for low VOC coatings Land Use Change - 2.0 Emissions Summary PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Year lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2012 12.42 97.10 58.02 0.11 30.81 4.82 35.63 0.07 4.68 4.74 0.00 0.95 0.00 11,296.82 2013 226.77 39.92 31.35 0.06 1.33 2.48 3.81 0.02 2.46 2.49 0.00 0.53 0.00 5,721.38 Total NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA Exhaust PM10 NANA NA NA NA Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NA Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Year lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 TotalFugitive PM10 2012 12.42 97.10 58.02 0.11 18.08 4.82 22.90 0.07 4.68 4.74 0.00 0.95 0.00 11,296.82 2013 57.25 39.92 31.35 0.06 0.06 2.48 2.54 0.02 2.46 2.49 0.00 0.53 0.00 5,721.38 Total NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA Exhaust PM10 NANA NA NA NA Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NA 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Fugitive PM10 Area 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 184.73 Mobile 5.53 13.81 54.37 0.09 9.83 0.61 10.44 0.14 0.52 0.66 0.36 9,420.36 Total 10.14 13.96 54.50 0.09 9.83 0.61 10.45 0.14 0.00 9,605.090.52 0.67 0.36 1 of 9 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Area 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 184.73 Mobile 5.53 13.81 54.37 0.09 9.83 0.61 10.44 0.14 0.52 0.66 0.36 9,420.36 Total 10.14 13.96 54.50 0.09 9.83 0.61 10.45 0.14 0.36 0.00 9,605.090.52 0.67 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 3.0 Construction Detail 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition (Library Parking) - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 TotalFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Dust 0.81 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 0.83 7,528.31 Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.830.00 3.80 3.80 Exhaust PM10 0.07 0.81 3.80 4.61 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 7,528.31 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Fugitive PM10 Hauling 0.27 2.22 1.14 0.00 1.76 0.10 1.85 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.01 311.10 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.30 0.10 1.22 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 193.28 Total 0.57 2.32 2.36 0.00 1.99 0.11 2.09 0.00 504.380.10 0.10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.02 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 0.81 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 0.83 7,528.31 Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.830.00 3.80 3.80 Exhaust PM10 0.07 0.81 3.80 4.61 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 7,528.31 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Fugitive PM10 Hauling 0.27 2.22 1.14 0.00 0.01 0.10 0.11 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.01 311.10 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.30 0.10 1.22 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 193.28 Total 0.57 2.32 2.36 0.00 0.02 0.11 0.13 0.00 504.380.10 0.10 0.02 2 of 9 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Library Parking Paving - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 4.51 27.70 17.08 0.03 2.41 2.41 2.41 2.41 0.40 2,409.23 Paving 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.92 27.70 17.08 0.402.41 2.41 Exhaust PM10 0.03 2.41 2.41 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,409.23 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 TotalFugitive PM10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.40 0.14 1.62 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 257.70 Total 0.40 0.14 1.62 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.32 0.00 257.700.01 0.01 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.02 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 4.51 27.70 17.08 0.03 2.41 2.41 2.41 2.41 0.40 2,409.23 Paving 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.92 27.70 17.08 0.402.41 2.41 Exhaust PM10 0.03 2.41 2.41 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,409.23 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 TotalFugitive PM10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.40 0.14 1.62 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 257.70 Total 0.40 0.14 1.62 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 257.700.01 0.01 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.02 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.4 Demolition (Building Site) - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 0.65 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 0.83 7,528.31 Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.830.00 3.80 3.80 Exhaust PM10 0.07 0.65 3.80 4.45 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 7,528.31 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Fugitive PM10 Hauling 0.22 1.78 0.91 0.00 1.40 0.08 1.48 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.01 248.88 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.30 0.10 1.22 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 193.28 Total 0.52 1.88 2.13 0.00 1.63 0.09 1.72 0.00 442.160.08 0.08 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.02 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 0.65 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 0.83 7,528.31 Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.830.00 3.80 3.800.07 0.65 3.80 4.45 7,528.31 3 of 9 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Fugitive PM10 Hauling 0.22 1.78 0.91 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.01 248.88 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.30 0.10 1.22 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 193.28 Total 0.52 1.88 2.13 0.00 0.02 0.09 0.11 0.00 442.160.08 0.08 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.02 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Site Preparation - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 18.07 0.00 18.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.07 4.27 4.27 4.27 4.27 0.93 8,017.28 Total 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.930.00 4.27 4.27 Exhaust PM10 0.07 18.07 4.27 22.34 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 8,017.28 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Fugitive PM10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.36 0.13 1.46 0.00 0.28 0.01 0.29 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 231.93 Total 0.36 0.13 1.46 0.00 0.28 0.01 0.29 0.00 231.930.01 0.01 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 18.07 0.00 18.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.07 4.27 4.27 4.27 4.27 0.93 8,017.28 Total 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.930.00 4.27 4.27 Exhaust PM10 0.07 18.07 4.27 22.34 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 8,017.28 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 TotalFugitive PM10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.36 0.13 1.46 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 231.93 Total 0.36 0.13 1.46 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 231.930.01 0.01 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.6 Grading - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 6.43 0.00 6.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 6.76 51.98 31.88 0.05 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.60 5,252.76 Total 6.76 51.98 31.88 0.600.00 3.00 3.00 Exhaust PM10 0.05 6.43 3.00 9.43 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 5,252.76 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 TotalFugitive PM10 Hauling 5.52 45.08 25.56 0.06 24.27 1.82 26.09 0.06 1.67 1.74 0.22 5,951.34 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.14 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 90.20 Total 5.66 45.13 26.13 0.06 24.38 1.82 26.20 0.06 6,041.541.67 1.74 0.23 4 of 9 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 6.43 0.00 6.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 6.76 51.98 31.88 0.05 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.60 5,252.76 Total 6.76 51.98 31.88 0.600.00 3.00 3.00 Exhaust PM10 0.05 6.43 3.00 9.43 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 5,252.76 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 TotalFugitive PM10 Hauling 5.52 45.08 25.56 0.06 0.19 1.82 2.01 0.06 1.67 1.74 0.22 5,951.34 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.14 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 90.20 Total 5.66 45.13 26.13 0.06 0.19 1.82 2.02 0.06 6,041.541.67 1.74 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.23 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 5.63 37.37 23.73 0.04 2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54 0.51 4,051.23 Total 5.63 37.37 23.73 0.04 2.54 2.54 4,051.232.54 2.54 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.51 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.57 5.28 3.07 0.01 0.27 0.18 0.46 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.02 798.45 Worker 1.37 0.48 5.60 0.01 1.06 0.03 1.09 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.05 889.08 Total 1.94 5.76 8.67 0.02 1.33 0.21 1.55 0.02 1,687.530.20 0.23 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.07 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 5.63 37.37 23.73 0.04 2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54 0.51 4,051.23 Total 5.63 37.37 23.73 0.04 2.54 2.54 4,051.232.54 2.54 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.51 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.57 5.28 3.07 0.01 0.02 0.18 0.21 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.02 798.45 Worker 1.37 0.48 5.60 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.05 889.08 Total 1.94 5.76 8.67 0.02 0.06 0.21 0.28 0.02 1,687.530.20 0.23 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.07 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.28 0.46 4,050.31 Total 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 4,050.312.28 2.28 0.46 5 of 9 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.51 4.82 2.77 0.01 0.27 0.17 0.44 0.01 0.15 0.16 0.02 800.19 Worker 1.28 0.44 5.14 0.01 1.06 0.03 1.09 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.05 870.88 Total 1.79 5.26 7.91 0.02 1.33 0.20 1.53 0.02 1,671.070.18 0.21 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.07 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.28 0.46 4,050.31 Total 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 4,050.312.28 2.28 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.46 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.51 4.82 2.77 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.19 0.01 0.15 0.16 0.02 800.19 Worker 1.28 0.44 5.14 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.05 870.88 Total 1.79 5.26 7.91 0.02 0.06 0.20 0.26 0.02 1,671.070.18 0.21 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.07 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.8 Building Paving - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 4.23 26.23 16.92 0.03 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.24 0.38 2,408.70 Paving 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.64 26.23 16.92 0.382.24 2.24 Exhaust PM10 0.03 2.24 2.24 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,408.70 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Fugitive PM10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.37 0.13 1.49 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 252.43 Total 0.37 0.13 1.49 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.32 0.00 252.430.01 0.01 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 4.23 26.23 16.92 0.03 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.24 0.38 2,408.70 Paving 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.64 26.23 16.92 0.382.24 2.24 Exhaust PM10 0.03 2.24 2.24 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,408.70 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Fugitive PM10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.37 0.13 1.49 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 252.43 Total 0.37 0.13 1.49 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 252.430.01 0.01 0.01 6 of 9 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.9 Architectural Coating - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Archit. Coating 226.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 0.49 2.96 1.94 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.04 282.10 Total 226.52 2.96 1.94 0.040.27 0.27 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.27 0.27 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 282.10 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 TotalFugitive PM10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.26 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.21 0.01 0.22 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 176.70 Total 0.26 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.21 0.01 0.22 0.00 176.700.01 0.01 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Archit. Coating 56.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off-Road 0.49 2.96 1.94 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.04 282.10 Total 57.00 2.96 1.94 0.040.27 0.27 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.27 0.27 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 282.10 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 TotalFugitive PM10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.26 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.21 0.01 0.22 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 176.70 Total 0.26 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.21 0.01 0.22 0.00 0.01 176.700.01 0.01 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 TotalFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Mitigated 5.53 13.81 54.37 0.09 9.83 0.61 10.44 0.14 0.52 0.66 0.36 9,420.36 Unmitigated 5.53 13.81 54.37 0.09 9.83 0.61 10.44 0.14 0.52 0.66 0.36 9,420.36 Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated NA NA NA NA Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Medical Office Building 1,109.19 275.07 47.59 Annual VMT Annual VMT 2,243,504 2,243,504 Parking Lot 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,243,504 2,243,504Total1,109.19 275.07 47.59 7 of 9 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Medical Office Building 8.90 13.30 7.40 29.60 51.40 19.00 Parking Lot 8.90 13.30 7.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 8.90 13.30 7.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 184.73 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 184.73 Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Total CO2Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Medical Office Building 1560.74 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 184.73 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 184.73Total0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 Mitigated 0.00 0.01 0.000.01 NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Medical Office Building 1.56074 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 184.73 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 184.73Total0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 6.0 Area Detail 0.000.01 0.00 0.01 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Mitigated 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unmitigated 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA Exhaust PM10 NANA NA NA NA Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NA 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 SubCategory lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 TotalFugitive PM10 Architectural Coating 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 3.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 8 of 9 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Architectural Coating 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 3.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Vegetation 9 of 9 NANANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NATotal NA NA NA 0.00 0.53 0.00 5,639.852.47 2.49 11,231.17 2013 226.82 40.20 31.32 0.06 1.33 2.48 3.81 0.02 0.00 0.95 0.000.07 4.71 4.78 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2012 12.68 99.06 61.03 0.11 30.81 4.86 35.67 SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Year lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OROG NOx CO Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Architectural Coating - Adjust VOC content for low VOC coatings Land Use Change - 2.0 Emissions Summary PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Off-road Equipment - Trips and VMT - Adjust Per Grading Inflation Factor Demolition - Grading - Adjust Lot Size Per Project Specifications Construction Phase - Adjust Activities Per Project Specifications Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Adjust Equipment Based on Changes in Grading Scheudle (Inflation Factor 0.53) 1.3 User Entered Comments 31 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Adjust Lot Acerage to Match Project Plans Climate Zone 9 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Southern California EdisonUrbanizationUrbanWind Speed (m/s) Parking Lot 129 Space 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Utility Company Medical Office Building 30.7 1000sqft Parking Lot 197 Space 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1 Date: 8/11/2011 2926 Parkway Corporate Center South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter 1 of 28 0.37 0.00 8,940.320.53 0.68 8,755.59 Total 10.43 14.97 53.34 0.09 9.83 0.62 10.45 0.14 0.370.14 0.53 0.670.09 9.83 0.62 10.44Mobile 5.82 14.82 53.21 0.00 0.00 184.730.00 0.01 0.00 Energy 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Area 4.59 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.37 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG 0.00 8,940.320.53 0.68 8,755.59 Total 10.43 14.97 53.34 0.09 9.83 0.62 10.45 0.14 0.370.14 0.53 0.670.09 9.83 0.62 10.44Mobile 5.82 14.82 53.21 0.00 0.00 184.730.00 0.01 0.00 Energy 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Area 4.59 0.00 0.00 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total NA 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 NANA NA NA NA Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NA NA NANA NA NA NATotalNA NA NA 0.00 0.53 0.00 5,639.852.47 2.49 11,231.17 2013 57.30 40.20 31.32 0.06 0.06 2.48 2.54 0.02 0.00 0.95 0.000.07 4.71 4.780.11 18.08 4.86 22.932012 12.68 99.06 61.03 Year lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2 of 28 0.02 486.150.10 0.10 176.61 Total 0.63 2.47 2.35 0.00 1.99 0.11 2.09 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.23 0.01 0.24Worker 0.35 0.12 1.13 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 309.54 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010.00 0.09 0.090.00 1.76 0.10 1.85Hauling 0.28 2.35 1.22 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 7,528.31 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.07 0.81 3.80 4.61 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.830.00 3.80 3.80Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.83 7,528.313.80 3.80 0.00 Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 0.00 0.00 0.000.81 0.00 0.81Fugitive Dust Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total 3.2 Demolition (Library Parking) - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3.0 Construction Detail 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 3 of 28 2,409.230.03 2.41 2.41 0.402.41 2.41Total 4.92 27.70 17.08 0.000.00 0.00 2,409.23 Paving 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.402.41 2.410.03 2.41 2.41Off-Road 4.51 27.70 17.08 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 235.480.01 0.01 235.48 Total 0.46 0.16 1.50 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.31 0.01 0.32Worker 0.46 0.16 1.50 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 2,409.23 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.03 2.41 2.41 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.402.41 2.41Total 4.92 27.70 17.08 0.000.00 0.00 2,409.23 Paving 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.402.41 2.410.03 2.41 2.41Off-Road 4.51 27.70 17.08 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.02 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Library Parking Paving - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 486.150.10 0.10 176.61 Total 0.63 2.47 2.35 0.00 0.02 0.11 0.13 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.01 0.01 0.02Worker 0.35 0.12 1.13 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 309.54 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010.00 0.09 0.090.00 0.01 0.10 0.11Hauling 0.28 2.35 1.22 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 7,528.31 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.07 0.81 3.80 4.61 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.830.00 3.80 3.80Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.83 7,528.313.80 3.80 0.00 Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 0.00 0.00 0.000.81 0.00 0.81Fugitive Dust CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 4 of 28 0.02 424.240.08 0.08 176.61 Total 0.57 2.00 2.11 0.00 1.63 0.09 1.72 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.23 0.01 0.24Worker 0.35 0.12 1.13 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 247.63 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010.00 0.07 0.070.00 1.40 0.08 1.48Hauling 0.22 1.88 0.98 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 7,528.31 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.07 0.65 3.80 4.45 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.830.00 3.80 3.80Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.83 7,528.313.80 3.80 0.00 Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 0.00 0.00 0.000.65 0.00 0.65Fugitive Dust CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.4 Demolition (Building Site) - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 235.480.01 0.01 235.48 Total 0.46 0.16 1.50 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.01 0.01 0.02Worker 0.46 0.16 1.50 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 5 of 28 8,017.280.07 18.07 4.27 22.34 0.930.00 4.27 4.27Total 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.93 8,017.284.27 4.27 0.00 Off-Road 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.07 4.27 4.27 0.00 0.00 0.0018.07 0.00 18.07Fugitive Dust CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.02 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Site Preparation - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 424.240.08 0.08 176.61 Total 0.57 2.00 2.11 0.00 0.02 0.09 0.11 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.01 0.01 0.02Worker 0.35 0.12 1.13 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 247.63 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010.00 0.07 0.070.00 0.01 0.08 0.09Hauling 0.22 1.88 0.98 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 7,528.31 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.07 0.65 3.80 4.45 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.830.00 3.80 3.80Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.83 7,528.313.80 3.80 0.00 Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 0.00 0.00 0.000.65 0.00 0.65Fugitive Dust CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 6 of 28 0.01 211.930.01 0.01 211.93 Total 0.42 0.14 1.35 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.01 0.01 0.02Worker 0.42 0.14 1.35 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 8,017.28 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.07 18.07 4.27 22.34 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.930.00 4.27 4.27Total 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.93 8,017.284.27 4.27 0.00 Off-Road 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.07 4.27 4.27 0.00 0.00 0.0018.07 0.00 18.07Fugitive Dust CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 211.930.01 0.01 211.93 Total 0.42 0.14 1.35 0.00 0.28 0.01 0.29 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.28 0.01 0.29Worker 0.42 0.14 1.35 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 7 of 28 0.51 4,051.232.54 2.54 4,051.23 Total 5.63 37.37 23.73 0.04 2.54 2.54 0.512.54 2.540.04 2.54 2.54Off-Road 5.63 37.37 23.73 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.07 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 1,604.800.20 0.23 812.41 Total 2.19 6.08 8.62 0.02 1.33 0.22 1.55 0.02 0.050.01 0.03 0.050.01 1.06 0.03 1.09Worker 1.59 0.55 5.19 0.02 792.390.17 0.18 0.00 Vendor 0.60 5.53 3.43 0.01 0.27 0.19 0.46 0.01 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.51 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG 4,051.232.54 2.54 4,051.23 Total 5.63 37.37 23.73 0.04 2.54 2.54 0.512.54 2.540.04 2.54 2.54Off-Road 5.63 37.37 23.73 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.24 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 5,976.091.71 1.77 82.42 Total 5.92 47.08 29.15 0.06 0.19 1.85 2.06 0.06 0.010.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.01Worker 0.16 0.06 0.53 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 5,893.67 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.230.06 1.71 1.770.06 0.19 1.85 2.05Hauling 5.76 47.02 28.62 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 5,252.76 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.05 6.43 3.00 9.43 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.600.00 3.00 3.00Total 6.76 51.98 31.88 0.60 5,252.763.00 3.00 0.00 Off-Road 6.76 51.98 31.88 0.05 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.006.43 0.00 6.43Fugitive Dust CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.24 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 5,976.091.71 1.77 82.42 Total 5.92 47.08 29.15 0.06 24.38 1.85 26.24 0.06 0.010.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.11 0.00 0.11Worker 0.16 0.06 0.53 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 5,893.67 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.230.06 1.71 1.770.06 24.27 1.85 26.13Hauling 5.76 47.02 28.62 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 5,252.76 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.05 6.43 3.00 9.43 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.600.00 3.00 3.00Total 6.76 51.98 31.88 0.60 5,252.763.00 3.00 0.00 Off-Road 6.76 51.98 31.88 0.05 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.006.43 0.00 6.43Fugitive Dust CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.6 Grading - 2012 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 8 of 28 0.07 1,589.540.19 0.21 795.58 Total 2.04 5.53 7.87 0.02 0.06 0.20 0.26 0.02 0.050.01 0.03 0.050.01 0.04 0.03 0.07Worker 1.50 0.50 4.75 0.02 793.960.16 0.16 0.00 Vendor 0.54 5.03 3.12 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.19 0.01 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.46 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG 4,050.312.28 2.28 4,050.31 Total 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 0.462.28 2.280.04 2.28 2.28Off-Road 5.17 34.66 23.45 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.07 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 1,589.540.19 0.21 795.58 Total 2.04 5.53 7.87 0.02 1.33 0.20 1.53 0.02 0.050.01 0.03 0.050.01 1.06 0.03 1.09Worker 1.50 0.50 4.75 0.02 793.960.16 0.16 0.00 Vendor 0.54 5.03 3.12 0.01 0.27 0.17 0.44 0.01 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.46 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG 4,050.312.28 2.28 4,050.31 Total 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 0.462.28 2.280.04 2.28 2.28Off-Road 5.17 34.66 23.45 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.07 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 1,604.800.20 0.23 812.41 Total 2.19 6.08 8.62 0.02 0.06 0.22 0.28 0.02 0.050.01 0.03 0.050.01 0.04 0.03 0.07Worker 1.59 0.55 5.19 0.02 792.390.17 0.18 0.00 Vendor 0.60 5.53 3.43 0.01 0.02 0.19 0.21 0.01 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG 9 of 28 282.100.00 0.27 0.27 0.040.27 0.27Total 57.00 2.96 1.94 0.04 282.100.27 0.27 0.00 Off-Road 0.49 2.96 1.94 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.000.00 0.00Archit. Coating 56.51 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 161.420.01 0.01 161.42 Total 0.30 0.10 0.96 0.00 0.21 0.01 0.22 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.21 0.01 0.22Worker 0.30 0.10 0.96 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 282.10 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.27 0.27 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.040.27 0.27Total 226.52 2.96 1.94 0.04 282.100.27 0.27 0.00 Off-Road 0.49 2.96 1.94 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.000.00 0.00Archit. Coating 226.03 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.9 Architectural Coating - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 230.600.01 0.01 230.60 Total 0.43 0.15 1.38 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.01 0.01 0.02Worker 0.43 0.15 1.38 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 2,408.70 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.03 2.24 2.24 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.382.24 2.24Total 4.64 26.23 16.92 0.000.00 0.00 2,408.70 Paving 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.382.24 2.240.03 2.24 2.24Off-Road 4.23 26.23 16.92 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 0.01 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG 230.600.01 0.01 230.60 Total 0.43 0.15 1.38 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.31 0.01 0.32Worker 0.43 0.15 1.38 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total 2,408.70 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.03 2.24 2.24 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.382.24 2.24Total 4.64 26.23 16.92 0.000.00 0.00 2,408.70 Paving 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.382.24 2.240.03 2.24 2.24Off-Road 4.23 26.23 16.92 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.8 Building Paving - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG 10 of 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 8.90 13.30 7.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 8.90 13.30 7.40 H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Medical Office Building 8.90 13.30 7.40 29.60 51.40 19.00 Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW 2,243,504 2,243,504 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Total 1,109.19 275.07 47.59 Parking Lot 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Annual VMT 2,243,504 2,243,504Medical Office Building 1,109.19 275.07 47.59 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday NA 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated NA NA NA NANA NA NA NANA NA NA NATotal NA NA NA 0.37 8,755.590.53 0.67 8,755.59 Unmitigated 5.82 14.82 53.21 0.09 9.83 0.62 10.44 0.14 0.370.14 0.53 0.670.09 9.83 0.62 10.44Mitigated 5.82 14.82 53.21 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 TotalROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.01 161.420.01 0.01 161.42 Total 0.30 0.10 0.96 0.00 0.21 0.01 0.22 0.00 0.010.00 0.01 0.010.00 0.21 0.01 0.22Worker 0.30 0.10 0.96 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 11 of 28 0.000.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 184.73Total 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 184.73 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.01 0.00 0.010.13 0.00 0.00Medical Office Building 1560.74 0.02 0.15 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NA 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 NA NA NA NANA NA NA NANA NA NA NATotal NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 184.730.00 0.01 184.73 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.000.00 0.01 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OROG NOx CO Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 12 of 28 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 3.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00Architectural Coating 1.11 SubCategory lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total PM2.5 Total NA 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO N2O CO2eSO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 NANA NA NA NA Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NA NA NANA NA NA NATotal NA NA NA 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Unmitigated 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Mitigated 4.59 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 TotalROG NOx CO 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 0.000.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 184.73Total 0.02 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 184.73 Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.01 0.00 0.010.13 0.00 0.00Medical Office Building 1.56074 0.02 0.15 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10NaturalGas Use ROG NOx Mitigated 13 of 28 9.0 Vegetation 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 3.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00Architectural Coating 1.11 CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OFugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated ROG 14 of 28 15 of 28 16 of 28 17 of 28 18 of 28 19 of 28 20 of 28 21 of 28 22 of 28 23 of 28 24 of 28 25 of 28 26 of 28 27 of 28 28 of 28 APPENDIX B Phase I Environmental Site Assessment LIMITED PHASE I NVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AT APN: 8474-001-906 outheast Corner of Garvey Avenue and West Covina Parkway West Covina, California FO Parkway Investment, LLC 17528 Rowland Street City of Industry, California 91748 CONDUCTE BY CAL LAND ENGINEERING INC. CLE PROJECT NO.: 11-051-002 ESA May 4, 2011 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 1 of 8 CLE Project No.: 11-051-002ESA May 4, 2011 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 SITE LOCATION 2 1.2 PURPOSE 2 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK 2 2.0 SITE CONDITION 2 3.0 HISTORICAL DOCUMENT REVIEW 3 3.1 SANBORN MAP REVIEW 3 3.2 CITY OF WEST COVINA PUBLIC WORKS AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 3 3.3 OIL WELLS 3 3.4 CITY DIRECTORY 3 4.0 AREA GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 4 4.1 SOIL/GEOLOGY 4 4.2 GROUNDWATER 4 5.0 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS 4 5.1 ASBESTOS 4 5.2 RADON OCCURRENCE 5 6.0 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCH 5 6.1 NPL 5 6.2 CAL-SITES 5 6.3 CHMIRS 6 6.4 CORTESE 6 6.5 LUST 6 6.6 UST 6 6.7 HAZNET 6 6.8 RCRA 7 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 7.1 CONCLUSIONS 7 7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 8 8.0 LIMITATIONS 8 9.0 REFERENCE 8 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 2 of 8 CLE Project No.: 11-051-002ESA May 4, 2011 0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Site Location This report presents a summary of our Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the site located at Southeast Corner of Garvey Avenue and West Covina Parkway, APN: 8474-001- 906, West Covina, California; QC! Project No.: 11-051-002 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this assessment is to review existing environmental conditions, and to evaluate potential environmental hazards that may exist at the subject site due to present and historical onsite. 3 Scope of Work The following limited scopes of work were conducted for this environmental assessment: Review of available historical information of the subject property and its surrounding area to assess past uses that may contribute to potential environmental impacts. 2. Review available information of regional geology and hydrogeology literatures regarding underlying geologic conditions and groundwater regime in the vicinity of the subject property. Review of available California State and US Federal databases to determine if leaking underground storage tanks, hazardous waste generators, Superfund sites, landfills, and other documented hazardous releases may have existed within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. 4. Preparation of this report to include a finding summary of this assessment and its conclusions, and recommendations for further investigations. .0 SITE CONDITIO Based on the information, it is understood that the overall site is bounded on the north by Garvey Avenue, on the south/southwest by West Covina Parkway, on the east by the Sunset Avenue, and on the south/southeast by the existing county facilities. The site is currently owned by the City of West Covina and used as city hall and associated usage. However, the area of interest for the planned development is located on the westerly portion of the site. A site reconnaissance was 1 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 Page 3 of 8 May 4, 2011 Parkway Investment, LLC. CLE Project No.: 11-051-002ESA performed by CLE field investigator on April 20, 2011. The planned site is located on southeast corner of Garvey Avenue and West Covina Parkway. A sign posted at the corner of the property indicates that the site will be used for a 5 stories office/condo building. The proposed building pad is bounded on the north by Garvey Avenue, on the south/southwest by West Covina Parkway, and on the east/southeast by the existing parking and drive areas (see figure 1). The site is relatively flat with difference in elevation over the front portion of the site approximately 1-3 feet. At the time of our field investigation, the northern/northwestern portion is vacant and covered by relatively dense vegetation. However, it is understood that the northern/northwestern portion of the area is covered by the previously placed fills to an approximately height of 20 feet above the adjacent relatively flat area. 3.0 HISTORICAL DOCUMENT REVIEW 3.1 Sanborn Map Review No Sanborn fire insurance map was identified for the subject site. 3.2 City of West Covina Public Works and Building Department CLE representative visited the City of West Covina Public Work's and Building Department on April 20, 2011. Based on the information obtained in the City, it is understood that the site has always been a vacant land and there was no record of any construction for the project site. No underground or above ground storage tanks permits were found in the City of West Covina Building Department Records. 3.3 Oil Wells The "Munger Map Book 1989" for California — Alaska Oil and Gas Fields was reviewed. The Munger Map Book compiled the oil wells data from State of California, Department of Natural Resources — Division of Oil and Gas, Oil Operators, Munger Oilogram and other journals. Based on the reviewed Munger Map Book, it is concluded that there was no oil well existed at the site which required special destruction operations. 3.4 City Directory Business directories were reviewed at approximately five years intervals for the year spanning 1972 through 2008. The following table presents a summary of the reviewed directory. 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 /v /, . , \ I \ , / /,\ • , Ifb • /N " /\- • 0"-V- • • / • _I u. \ • rose - ‘ \ db.\ •-• --, ,--i., --F -; K9' / s ,:. 1 1 , .7. , //, 6 .....-.... ---•-z: -1 f.-T-, I,-;-. /- . ,' ,/ ki,7,a, --, , , / , . ,- /---- a/ 1,;)41/1 Pk'', '''• n • ,.. I a,, - ll 7,71t, 4„or _ - , \ ,.j6.\ tag \ Nit 1., -Y0 // '7'44 1.1 X ! \ _4; •n ; . r yi, '„,z, ''', .1,Rir _ L.,:."' n '''' - •\\ ., ‘',..1. s", ''' ---,r /-14). -4,pe, *cazt4,-",. ---_,- 4.,,,,-.„ -, ;•; \ .- • - - -q. ). • sl'sz., , •, • \\ .. . .i< '-'1'1,";:z.„ \ \ .•:.k1,, N \ ,,,,.. • 8;\_._ > --`"----.. • -;.-„,..L\ 0 ''is•-• . ''--.• •• s;:s. ,. • \ \ \ `,.`,... ›..t, ,I.,`,.‘:\ ,,,•.1 ;..... ' - - N .;.;•• N'‘. ,,,,,. .,,, .. • . \\ ----- - L )I -I-Th. _____ ... / - il4-------A\-7J > •.. ( )i c ( \1 ,-ki .e. t., 1,/,,,,,, •„, /- -- / "" , / 4, ',...,;\ I -'•••• •-••-'- i :-I.- L,t..N \ :: A-r // ) / AY 1- / ••,, / // \\s ) -\>• \\- r1j 7\, !‹,\ - 1. • _ r _ x 1 . . . _.. - • . • • - - • ....-\"-._--;------ - _.7 _— -: — _ -_-=_'-_x-=_--;_E_: —3_5..._573 - , - _ r; ' A-737'39' Ln1350.: - '`:.1 Garvey Avenue ..--; (,- ‘, ---;/ , ---... __:::.-4 \ _,,,,,,.,5ps ,....„,-__ ,_ ‘ ..,...-...;,.-----, ..-,.__-=-_-.-_-,..5-_,?_.---._„2„2--4 • ' i._._--,--,----_-_-_- _,=-_!---74 -._=.------- - - rt _...........„..,...„••,...„..,,,,,- ,47..-rce.t2.---, -+'"---:1---;"- .--.-- i /- \ \.,.. ..... -- - ___ ,..,, , , , „..... 0,,.. .... , . .......-- ". .-- , -,-..—,-,- -------_ -=-----------4- -..,J,Eltss;2#=----.. 1_\,*A.-.. ,5,/•c,' ., s,'b4 ',')X-„,,:,,:// '§.' •- </\'.,/'",, ,., ,)\.(.A,' s1,7• ,;" .s4s' ,‘i,c.r, - ypi" ,cil'fe, 5 c„ X .,//-/i 1V 1/ • " /se ./1k4",I ,. /, 5 I 21i -,,-- -1. - i,.. '../„ .• , ',-'-.-. ” -_ • -, ...,.-,- -, .,,.-." /- '-r.- 1-.;' /.)--•-,/-°_ -0-, _,-,_ /„ ,,•7 '..-,'.-"S.,.... 5.:,.' -:-e'i*-.---,._ "0./.."..-:.'i.:.„:.-..,:a.-...-.,..-..- •,.. .-."-."j-- = -".-:.. -----:-.-.:--•, „- -•.-•:_:'... _.• •• 7•. _Nr '._ -------- - - : ... ./ ,-•,:-- -- // /,) „. '. /, !/ /7..,„-/,.-„.__ -: • .44, / • ../ I7.' •', ) '- / I 1 \ I r „,,,...-:::== , ..!-?..)1 , R•.:55 0, 1 1 k ./.1 \ - - ..;,.-”' '''• nC . ...‘3....- --:-,.-1 ',c • .1.• ' Tt0(123•1' , -1 N.Ip , • \ \ I • ' pillr, --....,.. . ''../.., •,. ' ,4 , n 7.-- ,. — - ..." Ao ,. ::::-.9- /- ,/ /..-7-7--=--,-A.N. . \\ \ A44::.>,-- "'..N ..•\, ' -,,. \\''. :‹ • '• •• ".‘,„ v • • ' --N\N , . ;•,,;. . i •:;- ‘.>-----z\ kj,.. !". , ,...- i , ,•,. , \ Qts, /1 %.';‘, • ..-- er ,,,„ i; ,,,--„,-..,,, ,,,- - 0„ \\ s- . „..., 'N \ j \ \ N ::.\-"q••,.. \ .s.s.: l's //)_, ',-,\< ,.< I n ...Lk, \ 'VI‹), 5 A .1k. 1 •Z y I , .0.;., \ / / ‘k• 1 ., • .5...e,; / / / , / / \ \ . // - / • 11 Scale : As Shown LEGEND: Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental & Civil Engineering Services Project Address: APN: 8474-001-906 Corner of Garvey Ave. and West Covina Pakwy West Covina, California - Approximate Site Limit /MB EMIL 11, Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 4 of 8 CLE Project No.: 11-051-002ESA May 4, 2011 TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1444 W. Garvey Ave, West Covina, CA 91790 Year, Uses, Source 2008 Police Departrments Haines Criss-Cross Directory W. Garvey Ave. S. 2008 No address listings prior to (1320) W.Garvey Ave. S.Haines Criss-Cross Directory No other addresses (1300-1599) block W.Garvey Ave. S.Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1320 W. Garvey Ave. S. 2008 Souther CA Sports Rehbltn Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1360W. Garvey Ave. S. 2008 Crazy Horse Rstrnt & Nightclub Haines Criss-Cross Directory W. Garvey Ave. S. 2001,1997, 1987, 1980, 1972 The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source. W. Garvey Ave. S. No Years Found W. Garvey Ave. S. No Years Found 1320 W. Garvey Ave. S. No Years Found 1360 W. Garvey Ave. S. No Years Found 4.0 AREA GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 4.1 Soil/Geology The underlying soils are characterized by typical deposits of alluvial fans, plains, and terraces in the Los Angeles County. 4.2 Groundwater Based on our review of the "Historically Highest Ground Water Contours and Borehole Log Data Locations, Baldwin Park Quadrangle", by CDMG, it is estimated that the highest ground water level is approximately 70 to 80 feet below the existing grade. Open File, Report 98-13 5.0 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS 5.1 Asbestos Asbestos-containing materials were used in many commercial products since early this century. Its use had peaked in the period between World War II and the 1970s. However, based on information obtained from manufacturers represented by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, it is unlikely that asbestos-containing materials were commercially used since late 1970s. The site has always been a vacant land; therefore, it is unlikely that asbestos-containing materials were presented on the existing onsite building materials. 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 5 of 8 CLE Project No.: 11-051-002ESA May 4, 2011 5.2 Radon Occurrence Radon is a naturally-occurring radioactive gas. It can not be seen, smelled, or tasted and is the product of the natural radioactive decay of uranium. Radon is found most frequently in high concentrations in soils and rocks containing uranium, granite, shale, phosphate, and pitchblende. Radon may also be found in soils that are contaminated by certain types of industrial waste, such as by-products of uranium or phosphate mining waste. The site is underlain by soil deposits of alluvial fans, plains, and terraces of the Los Angeles Basin. It is CLE's opinion that the potential of high concentration radon occurring at the site is remote. 6.0 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCH A government records search conducted for the subject site. The records search was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) to identify potentially contaminated properties located within one-mile radius of the referenced site. Based on ASTM E1527-05, the one-mile radius was selected as the maximum distance that existing contamination might migrate or transport to the project site. Results of the government records search are provided in Appendix A, which lists the entire recorded contaminated site. A brief discussion of the contaminated sites is also presented below, as based on information provided by EDR. 6.1 NPL Under the US Federal EPA's CERCLA program (also known as the Superfund Program), EPA will identify and compile a list of all potential hazardous substances release sites (CERCLIS). Once on CERCLIS, the site will be assessed by the EPA, or appropriate state agencies, to determine necessary actions to be taken, if any. The inclusion of a site in the CERLCIS list does not necessarily confirm that the site poses a significant health or environmental threat. Once a site has been included in the CERCLIS, the EPA will use the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) to determine its potential risk to human health and/or environment. Only CERCLIS sites that present significant risk are included in the National Priority List (NPL). The record search as provided by EDR, indicates that 1 NPL site is located within 1 mile of the site. 6.2 CAL-SITES This database contains both known and potentially hazardous substance sites. The database is maintained by the DISC (TSCP — Toxic Substance Control Program) via interviews with officials 1 from county health agencies, local fire departments, county agricultural commissioners, and other 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 6 of 8 CLE Project No.: 11-051-002ESA May 4, 2011 agencies. Most contamination information is preliminary. Once the information (contamination) is confirmed, the site will be switched to AWP (Annual Workplan). A review of the Cal-Sites list revealed that there is no HIST Cal-Site located within 1 mile of the subject property. 6.3 CHMIRS The California Hazardous Material Incident Report System contains information of reported hazardous material incidents, such as accidental spills or releases. The source is the California Office of Emergency Services. The record search indicates that there is no CHMIRS site located within 1 mile of the subject property. 6.4 CORTESE This database includes sites of the following characteristics: public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic materials identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with USTs having a reportable releases, and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The record search indicates that there is no CORTESE site located within 0.5 mile radius of the subject site. 6.5 LUST This database contains an inventory of leaking underground storage tank. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. Based on the information provided by EDR, 5 LUST facilities are located within 1/2 miles of the subject site. 6.6 UST The Underground Storage Tank databases contain registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 UST site within approximately 114 miles of the subject property. 6.7 HAZNET This database is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000-1,000,000 annually, representing 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 7 of 8 CLE Project No.: 11-051-002ESA May 4, 2011 approximately 350,000-500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, & disposal method. A review of this database revealed that there are no HAZNET sites within 1/8 miles of the subject property. 6.8 RCRA RCRA is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRA database allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. The review of RCRA-SQG small quantity generators (SOG) database dated 3/25/2009 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7.1 Conclusions The following conclusions are based on information collected during this assessment and are subject to the limitations stated in Section 8 of this report. 1. The subject property consists of a vacant land located on the westerly portion of the city owned property. Based on the information obtained from City of West Covina, the site will be used for proposed 5 stories office/condo building. 2. It is understood that the planned development area is covered by the previously placed fills to an approximate height of 20 feet above the adjacent relatively flat area. No obvious hazardous materials were observed within the near surface soils. However, it is recommended that the existing previously placed fill be inspected during onsite construction. 3. Review of government record search indicates that the entire property is currently owned by the City of West Covina. Underground storage tanks (UST) or historically UST exists at the city owned property. Petroleum hydrocarbons and related hazardous materials were stored in these tanks. No leaking of these tanks was reported in the reviewed documents. Considering that the planned development area is located in the westerly portion of the currently vacant area of the subject property, it is our opinion that it is unlikely these tanks were located within this area. 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 8 of 8 CLE Project No.: 11-051-002ESA May 4, 2011 4. The existence of high concentration Radon is negligible at the site that is underlain by sedimentary deposits of alluvial soils. 5. Other listed sites are not likely to pose significant environmental concerns on the subject site by surface migration. 7.2 Recommendations Additional assessment is not recommended at this time. Any future development, such as change use of the facility, or use of the groundwater, should be reviewed by an experienced environmental consultant. 8.0 LIMITATIONS This Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report was prepared in accordance with generally accepted standards of technical practice for a determination of potential contaminant releases at or under the site. It should be noted that this assessment is completed without any on-site or off-site explorations; therefore, no statement of scientific certainly can be made pertaining to the subsurface conditions, which may be the result of on-site or off-site sources. Findings, conclusions and recommendations of this report with respect to hazardous waste potential are limited as being based on the scope of work performed and professional judgment concerning the significance of the data gather during CLE's investigation. This assessment is not, and should not be construed as, a warranty or guarantee about the presence or absence of hazardous contaminants, which may affect the subject site. 9.0 REFERENCE 1. ASTM Standards on Environmental Site Assessments includes E1527-05 Phase I ESA. 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 APPENDIX A GOVERNMENT RECORD SEARCH EDR® Environmental Data Resources Inc I Phase I Environmental 1444 W. Garvey Ave. S. West Covina, CA 91790 April 19, 2011 nDY1L))10.2s The EDR Radius Map TM Report with GeoCheck0 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.ed rn et. com FORM-BPK-SXS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map _ 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings _ 8 Orphan Summary 187 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking_ GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum.. A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting Source Map_ A-7 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8 Physical Setting Source Records Searched_ A-20 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2011 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC3042100.2s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1444 W. GARVEY AVE. S. WEST COVINA, CA 91790 COORDINATES Latitude (North): 34.071600 - 34° 4' 17,8" Longitude (West): 117.940200 - 117° 56' 24.7" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11 UTM X (Meters): 413244.1 UTM Y (Meters): 3770299.0 Elevation: 382 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: 34117-A8 BALDWIN PARK, Most Recent Revision: 1981 Photo Year: 2005 Source: USDA TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: Site Database(s) EPA ID CITY HALL HIST UST N/A 1444 W GARVEY AVE S WEST COVINA, CA 91790 WEST COVINA CITY HALL CA FID UST N/A 1444 W GARVEY AVE SOUTH WEST COVINA, CA 91790 CITY OF WEST COVINA CITY HALL LOS ANGELES CO. HMS N/A 1444W GARVEY AVE CDL WEST COVINA, CA EMI CITY OF WEST COVINA CITY HALL UST 1444W GARVEY AVE S WEST COVINA, CA 91790 TC3042100.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: Federal NPL site list Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY . Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System TC3042100.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State and tribal leaking storage tank lists SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2_ CERCLA Lien Information LUCIS Land Use Control Information System LIENS Environmental Liens Listing DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing Other Ascertainable Records RCRA-NonGen RCRA - Non Generators TC3042100.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data DOD Department of Defense Sites FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees UMTRA. Uranium Mill Tailings Sites MINES Mines Master Index File TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA_ Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)fTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FITS FIFRATTSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System PADS PCB Activity Database System MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO Radiation Information Database FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan NPDES NPDES Permits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List Notify 65 . Proposition 65 Records LA Co. Site Mitigation_ Site Mitigation List DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities WIP Well Investigation Program Case List HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations SCRD DRYCLEANERS . State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing FINANCIAL ASSURANCE Financial Assurance Information Listing HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER_ PCB Transformer Registration Database MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing COAL ASH DOE . Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. TC3042100.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NFL: Also known as Superfund, the National Priority List database is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund program. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA. A review of the NFL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2010 has revealed that there is 1 NPL site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) SUNSET & SAN BERNARDINOWNW 118 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) 0 11 CERCLIS: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NFL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. A review of the CERCLIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/30/2010 has revealed that there is 1 CERCLIS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) SUNSET & SAN BERNARDINOWNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) 0 11 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SEARS AUTO CENTER NO 2619 610S SUNSET AVE ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) B6 165 SEARS NO 1189 1209 PLAZA DR E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.244 mi.) 14 176 TC30421 00.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. A review of the US ENG CONTROLS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/05/2011 has revealed that there is 1 US ENG CONTROLS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) SUNSET & SAN BERNARDINOWNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) 0 11 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program's (SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/07/2011 has revealed that there are 2 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page Al HOA INVESTMENTS 524 S. GLENDORA AVE. ESE 112- 1(0.855 mi.) 20 183 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency BALDWIN PARK HIGH 3900 NORTH PUENTE AVENU NW 1/2 - 1(0.984 mi.) 21 184 Status: Inactive - Action Required State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/03/2011 has revealed that there are 5 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page MOBIL #11-DAF 700 SUNSET AVE S SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.225 mi.) C8 168 Status: Completed - Case Closed FIRESTONE TIRE 1035 WEST COVINA PKWY W ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.447 mi.) 19 182 Status: Completed - Case Closed Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page DOCTOR'S HOSPITAL OF WEST COVI 725 ORANGE AVE. S W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.270 mi.) 16 178 Status: Completed - Case Closed TC3042100.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lower Elevation K-MART Status: Completed - Case Closed WEST COVINA MAINTENANCE YARD Status: Completed - Case Closed Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page 730 ORANGE WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.288 mi.) 17 178 825 SUNSET AVE S S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.358 mi.) 18 180 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/03/2011 has revealed that there is 1 UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SUNSET KWIK GAS 700 S SUNSET AVE SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.228 mi.) C10 171 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites AOCONCERN: San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. A review of the AOCONCERN list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/30/2009 has revealed that there is 1 AOCONCERN site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.942 mi.) 0 11 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there is 1 CA F1D UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction I Distance Map ID Page MOBIL OIL CORP SS 11D4F 700 S SUNSET AVE SSE 1/8- 1/4 (0.225 mi.) C9 170 TC3042100.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there is 1 HIST UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page TALAL (SAM) K.KHALED 700 S SUNSET AVE SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.228 mi.) C11 171 SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990's. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 2 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page TALAL (SAM) K.KHALED 700 S SUNSET AVE SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.228 mi.) Cu1 171 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page WEST COVINA AUTO PARTS 1705 W GARVEY AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.200 mi.) 5 163 Other Ascertainable Records ROD: Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid the cleanup. A review of the ROD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/25/2011 has revealed that there is 1 ROD site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) SUNSET & SAN BERNARDINOWNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) 0 11 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 2 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page MOBIL #11-DAF 700 SUNSET AVE S SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.225 mi.) C8 168 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page K-MART 730 ORANGE WSW 1/4 - 1/2(0.288 mi.) 17 178 TC3042100.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 13 records. Site Name Database(s) TEXACO 61-106-0191 (FORME HIST CORTESE SHELL HIST CORTESE, LUST FORMER V I P CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS SEARS #8199 DRYCLEANERS, HAZNET SOCIETY CLEANERS & LAUNDRY DRYCLEANERS COX OIL COMPANY LUST SPECIALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL HAZNET CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION RCRA-SQG, FINDS BOCK MACHINE INC. WIP VAN ASCH INC. WIP E I DUPONT LABORATORY (DEST) LOS ANGELES CO. HMS CURTIS SAND & GRAVEL CO. MINES CONCORDE/INTERSPACE BA-FIERY CORP. ENVIROSTOR TC3042100.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 0 .M.1......4-7,:ii.-0,....mnimArd.,--Awati , "........7.4:61 .....A.1/4v .....=....!- 1,1%7r ikgraMTOrjamr.-m...,.....A. .44610MINEr..,USIF441*@all ligi•WalINENNIMMIIPAII•11/41•10/AHINer.Prmi. 11fflatannurz....., esits....„..,....w.,,,m.Arrio...2-7.-i-yr pasplar.....m......71) amilogousr-,-- 9.1f.A...16..qprAlbst-ip bleurat,41.r.rww.,, orroasmiloy*Tipy ,ww, Al , ,..Thwor4 stripaujo i itTc...v. dar UMW Firs II faffrairg r ' "EnIMINIIMS:42" BEIMIZIINCIII".7 prair.simrall. , • MailiiiiiiV m I.WiraMiEWAFF . IlimmAra varannagra :6 AUF7OF .ZIIIMMIAIM.E. WA IIMMI ANIIIIECl/Aar ' s ,A411,4T; #### /Pp '411. OA' *# Ar/ArjfrArArrArlp." I r n "&e, /ffirmr#1001:44 .4d OVERVIEW MAP - 3042100.2s 1 MIles Target Property Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property A. Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites 1/4 Indian Reservations BIA A, Power transmission lines Oil & Gas pipelines M 100-year flood zone Vt 500-year flood zone National Wetland Inventory 1/2 M Areas of Concern This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the , default map view. SITE NAME: Phase I Environmental ADDRESS: 1444W. Garvey Ave. S. West Covina CA 91790 LAT/LONG: 34.0716 / 117.9402 CLIENT: Cal Land Engineering CONTACT: Abe Kazemzadeh INQUIRY #: 3042100.2s DATE: April 19, 2011 8:24 am Copyright (0 2011 EDR, Inc. (0 2010 Tale Atlas Rel. 07/2009. * Target Property A Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property I. Manufactured Gas Plants Z Sensitive Receptors 1111 National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites DETAIL MAP - 3042100.2s „/:://://77 4 •.,, IS ' AT, 1:0, - . / .''t • !) „0 Jo Ep. / </%, ,, , if",' . -1,///,..// / ,/' / / / 4 • .. / 741Ik • . /: / / , /// / 74. ° / / ' / •" ' ./ / / .•/// //' / ' n " 0 1/16 1/6 1/4 lAlles I lnnI I - ..- - - Indian Reservations BIA E Areas of Concern ;\ / Oil & Gas pipelines M 100-year flood zone il 4/, 500-year flood zone IN National Wetland Inventory This report includes Interactive Map Layers display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Phase I Environmental CLIENT: Cal Land Engineering ADDRESS: 1444W. Garvey Ave. S. CONTACT: Abe Kazemzadeh West Covina CA 91790 INQUIRY #: 3042100.2s LAT/LONG: 34.0716 / 117.9402 DATE: April 19, 2011 8:25 am MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) <1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 >1 Plotted ENVIRONMENT Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 Proposed NPL 1.000 NPL LIENS TP Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS 0.500 FEDERAL FACILITY 1.000 Federal CERCL1S NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP 0.500 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 RCRA-SQG 0.250 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 US INST CONTROL 0.500 Federal ERNS list ERNS TP State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE 1.000 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR 1.000 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.500 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 SLIC 0.500 0 0 NR 1 0 NR 0 0 NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 2 NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 1 0 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 2 NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 1 4 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR TC3042100.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Target Database Property Search Distance (Miles) <1/8 0 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 NR >1 NR INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST X 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR HAULERS TP NR NR NR NR NR INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR Local Lists of Hazardous waste! Contaminated Sites US CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR HIST Cal-Sites 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR SCH 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR AOCONCERN 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR CDL X TP NR NR NR NR NR US HIST CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST X 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR HIST UST X 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR SWEEPS UST X 0.250 0 2 NR NR NR Local Land Records LIENS 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR DEED 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR CHMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR TC3042100.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) <1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 >1 Plotted LDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MCS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA-NonGen DOT OPS DOD FUDS CONSENT ROD UMTRA MINES IRIS TSCA FITS HIST FITS SSTS ICIS PADS MLTS RADINFO FINDS RAATS CA BOND EXP. PLAN NPDES WDS Cortese HIST CORTESE Notify 65 LA Co. Site Mitigation DRYCLEANERS WIP LOS ANGELES CO. HMS X HAZNET EMI X INDIAN RESERV SCRD DRYCLEANERS FINANCIAL ASSURANCE HWP HWT COAL ASH EPA PCB TRANSFORMER PROC MWMP COAL ASH DOE EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 1.000 0 1 0 0 NR 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.500 0 1 1 NR NR 2 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TC3042100.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) <1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 >1 Plotted _ EDR Historical Auto Stations 0.250 0' 1 NR NR NR EDR Historical Cleaners 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC3042100.2s Page 7 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number HIST UST U001570766 N/A Al Target Property CITY HALL 1444 W GARVEY AVE S WEST COVINA, CA 91790 Site 1 of 4 in cluster A Actual: HIST UST: 382 ft Region: STATE Facility ID: 00000034317 Facility Type: Other Other Type: CITY Total Tanks: 0002 Contact Name: MORRIS M. WOLFF Telephone: 8189628631 Owner Name: CITY OF WEST COVINA Owner Address: 1444 WEST GARVEY AVENUE Owner City,St,Zip: WEST COVINA, CA 91790 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 105 Year Installed: 1969 Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Tank Construction: Not reported Leak Detection: None Tank Num: 002 Container Num: 106 Year Installed: 1969 Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Tank Construction: Not reported Leak Detection: None A2 WEST COVINA CITY HALL CA FID UST S101587197 Target 1444W GARVEY AVE SOUTH SWEEPS UST N/A Property WEST COVINA, CA 91790 Site 2 of 4 in cluster A Actual: 382 ft. CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNs Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: 19055065 UTNKA 00034317 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported BOX Not reported WEST COVINA 91790 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active TC3042100.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number EDR ID Number WEST COVINA CITY HALL (Continued) 8101587197 SWEEPS UST: Status: Not reported Comp Number: 12649 Number: Not reported Board Of Equalization: 44-009865 Ref Date: Not reported Act Date: Not reported Created Date: Not reported Tank Status: Not reported Owner Tank Id: Not reported Swrcb Tank Id: 19-000-012649-000002 Actv Date: Not reported Capacity: 9000 Tank Use: UNKNOWN Stg: PRODUCT Content: Not reported Number Of Tanks: 1 Status: A Comp Number: 12649 Number: 4 Board Of Equalization: 44-009865 Ref Date: 01-08-91 Act Date: 01-08-91 Created Date: 06-30-89 Tank Status: A Owner Tank Id: 1 Swrcb Tank Id: 19-000-012649-000001 Actv Date: 01-08-91 Capacity: 4000 Tank Use: PETROLEUM Stg: Content: Not reported Number Of Tanks: 1 A3 CITY OF WEST COVINA CITY HALL LOS ANGELES CO. HMS U003777029 Target 1444 W GARVEY AVE CDL N/A Property WEST COVINA, CA EMI Site 3 of 4 in cluster A Actual: 382 ft. LOS ANGELES CO. Region: Facility Id: Facility Status: Area: Permit Number: Permit Status: Facility Type: HMS: LA 012494-012649 Permit 6C 00004475T Permit TO Region: Facility Id: Facility Status: Area: Permit Number: Permit Status: Facility Type: LA 017055-022883 OPEN 6C Not reported Not reported Not reported TC3042100.2s Page 9 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CITY OF WEST COVINA CITY HALL (Continued) CDL: Facility ID: 199608045 Lab Type: Illegal Drug Lab (L) - location where an illegal drug lab was operated or drug lab equipment and/or materials were stored. Facility ID: 199910098 Lab Type: Illegal Drug Lab (L) - location where an illegal drug lab was operated or drug lab equipment and/or materials were stored. EMI: Year: County Code: Air Basin: 1990 19 SC Facility ID: 65108 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 9111 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions TonsNr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0 Year: County Code: Air Basin: 1995 19 SC Facility ID: 65108 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 9199 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases TonsNr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases TonsNr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions TonsNr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen TonsNr: 1 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur TonsNr: 0 Particulate Matter TonsNr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr TonsNr: 0 U003777029 UST U004049090 N/A Target Property 1444 W GARVEY AVE S WEST COVINA, CA 91790 Site 4 of 4 in cluster A Actual: UST: 382 ft. Facility ID: 1596 Latitude: 34.07213 Longitude: -117.93789 TC3042100.2s Page 10 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Areas of SAN GABRIEL VALLEY Concern WNW LOS ANGELES (County), CA 1/2-1 4976 ft. AOCONCERN CCA0000001 N/A AOCONCERN: area where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office NPL Region WNW 1/8-1/4 1309 ft. SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) SUNSET & SAN BERNARDINO FREEWAY BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 NPL CERCLIS US ENG CONTROLS ROD FINDS 1000114961 CAD980818512 NPL: EPA ID: EPA Region Federal: Final Date: Category Details: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Value: CAD980818512 09 5/8/1984 Currently on the Final NPL Depth To Aquifer-<= 10 Feet 1 NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL Category Description: Distance To Nearest Population-> 0 And <= 1/4 Mile Category Value: 10 Site Details: Site Name: Site Status: Site Zip: Site City: Site State: Federal Site: Site County: EPA Region: Date Proposed: Date Deleted: Date Finalized: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) Final 91706 BALDWIN PARK CA No LOS ANGELES 09 09/08/83 Not reported 05/08/84 Substance Details: NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL Substance ID: Not reported Substance: Not reported CAS #: Not reported Pathway: Not reported Scoring: Not reported NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL Substance ID: U210 Substance: TETRACHLOROETHENE CAS #: 127-18-4 Pathway: GROUND WATER PATHWAY TC3042100.2s Page Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) Scoring: NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL Substance ID: U211 Substance: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CAS #: 56-23-5 Pathway: GROUND WATER PATHWAY Scoring: 4 NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL Substance ID: U228 Substance: TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) CAS #: 79-01-6 Pathway: GROUND WATER PATHWAY Scoring: 2 Summary Details: Conditions at listing September 1983): San Gabriel Valley Area 2) is a ground water plume that parallels the San Gabriel River to the west in the San Gabriel ground water basin in the Baldwin Park area of Los Angeles County, Califomia. The plume is about 7.5 miles long and 1.5 miles wide. Ground water is contaminated with trichloroethylene TCE), perchloroethylene PCE), and carbon tetrachloride, according to analyses by State agencies and local water companies. Many public wells in the area exceed the EPA Suggested No Adverse Response Levels SNARL) for TCE and PCE. Approximately 100,000 people are affected. Cities and public water companies in the area have tested to ensure that their water supplies containless than 5 parts per billion ppb) of TCE, a level considered safe for human consumption. When alternative methods of reducing the TCE level below 5 ppb are not effective, wells are removed from service. Status June 1984): A supplemental sampling program of contaminated wells will begin soon to get a snapshot view of the degree of contamination. The State Department of Health Services and EPA are preparing to initiate a remedial investigation/ feasibility study to determine the aerial and vertical extent of contamination and to develop alternatives for treatment and management of the problem. EPA continues its investigation to identify sources of the contamination. This site, along with the threeother San Gabriel Valley sites, was added to the NPL in May 1984 because it involves a serious problem that required taking immediate remedial action. Site Status Details: NPL Status: Final Proposed Date: 09/08/1983 Final Date: 05/08/1984 Deleted Date: Not reported Narratives Details: NPL Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA City: BALDWIN PARK State: CA CERCLIS: Site ID: 0902092 EPA ID: CAD980818512 Facility County: LOS ANGELES TC3042100.2s Page 12 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 1000114961 Short Name: Congressional District: IFMS ID: SMSA Number: USGC Hydro Unit: Federal Facility: DMNSN Number: Site Orphan Flag: RCRA ID: USGS Quadrangle: Site !nit By Prog: NFRAP Flag: Parent ID: RST Code: EPA Region: Classification: Site Settings Code: NPL Status: DMNSN Unit Code: RBRAC Code: RResp Fed Agency Code: Non NPL Status: Non NPL Status Date: Site Fips Code: CC Concurrence Date: CC Concurrence FY: Alias EPA ID: Site FUDS Flax SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 28,31,34 09M5 4480 18070106 Not a Federal Facility 12.25000 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 09 Groundwater SU Currently on the Final NPL SQMI Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 06037 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported CERCLIS Site Contact Name(s): Contact ID: Contact Name: Contact Tel: Contact Title: Contact Email: Contact ID: Contact Name: Contact Tel: Contact Title: Contact Email: Contact ID: Contact Name: Contact Tel: Contact Title: Contact Email: Contact ID: Contact Name: Contact Tel: Contact Title: Contact Email: Contact ID: Contact Name: Contact Tel: 9000127.00000 Wayne Praskins (415) 972-3181 Remedial Project Manager (RPM) Not reported 9271184.00000 Karen Jurist (415) 972-3219 Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Not reported 9270048.00000 Jeff Inglis (415) 972-3095 Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Not reported 13002167.00000 Carl Brickner (415) 972-3814 Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Not reported 9270438.00000 Dawn Richmond (415) 972-3097 TC3042100.2s Page 13 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 1000114961 Contact Title: Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Contact Email: Not reported CERCLIS Site Alias Name(s): Alias ID: 101 Alias Name: BALDWIN PARK Alias Address: Not reported Not reported Alias ID: 102 Alias Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) Alias Address: SUNSET & SN BERNARDINO FRWY BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 Alias ID: 103 Alias Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) Alias Address: SUNSET & SAN BERNARDINO FREEWAY BALDWIN PARK AREA, CA 91706 Alias Comments: Not reported Site Description: Four areas of groundwater contamination are listed on the National Priorities List: San Gabriel Valley Area 1, San Gabriel Valley Area 2, San Gabriel Valley 3, and San Gabriel Valley 4. The four areas represent a significant portion of the 170 square mile San Gabriel Valley in Los Angeles County, California. More than one million residents live in the San Gabriel Valley alongside a variety of commercial and industrial operations. The San Gabriel Aquifer, which underlies most of the San Gabriel Valley Basin, stores an estimated three trillion gallons of water and is the primary source of water for most of the Basin?s residents. Major surface water features in the San Gabriel Valley include the San Gabriel River, tributaries to the San Gabriel River system, and spreading basins located in or adjacent to the river channels. The approximate location of the San Gabriel Valley Area 2 Site is west of highway 39, south of the San Gabriel Mountains, east of the San Gabriel River, and north of Walnut Creek. Nearly all of the Baldwin Park area is fully developed for residential, commercial, and industrial use. The largest parcels of open land are active and inactive gravel pits and the Santa Fe flood Control Basin. Water purveyors in the site area include: the City of Azusa, California Domestic Water Company, City of Glendora, La Puente Valley County Water District, San Gabriel Valley Water Company, Suburban Water Systems, and Valley County Water District. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), major contaminants of concern at the San Gabriel Valley Sites, were used in large quantities at industrial facilities as early as the 1940?s. From the 1940?s through the 1980?s, carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethane, thrichlorethene, and other chlorinated solvents were used by hundreds of businesses for degreasing, as raw materials for automotive products, by a solvent recycler, for chemical extractions, and for other purposes. VOCs have been released by a combination of intentional disposal, careless handling during loading and unloading, leaking tanks and pipes, and other means. VOCs were not detected in ground water until 1979 during environmental monitoring activities conducted by Aerojet Electrosystems near its facility in Azusa. In May 1984, EPA listed four areas of contamination were listed as San Gabriel Valley Area 1 through 4. EPA began its enforcement efforts in the site area in 1985 with searches for and evaluations of historical Federal, State, and local records on chemical usage, handling, and disposal. In 1985, the California Regional Water Quality Board began its Well Investigation Program (WP) to identify the sources of ground water contamination detected in water supply wells. In 1989, EPA entered into a cooperative agreement to expand the WIP program to determine the nature and extent of contamination in the San Gabriel Valley. The RI/FS for the Baldwin Park OU was conducted concurrently with source identification efforts, as a fund-lead project. In March 1994, the Record of Decision (ROD) TC3042100.2s Page 14 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000114961 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) document was signed. CERCLIS Assessment History: Action Code: 001 Action: DISCOVERY Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 04/01/1980 Priority Level: Not reported Operable Unit: SITEWIDE Primary Responsibility: State, No Fund Money Planning Status: Not reported Urgency Indicator: Not reported Action Anomaly: Not reported Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: 001 ISSUE REQUEST LETTERS (104E) Not reported 08/01/1983 Not reported SITEWIDE Federal Enforcement Not reported Not reported Not reported Action Code: 001 Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 09/01/1983 Priority Level: Higher priority for further assessment Operable Unit: SITEWIDE Primary Responsibility: EPA Fund-Financed Planning Status: Not reported Urgency Indicator: Not reported Action Anomaly: Not reported Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: 001 SITE INSPECTION 03/01/1983 09/01/1983 Higher priority for further assessment SITEWIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported Action Code: 001 Action: HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM PACKAGE Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 09/01/1983 Priority Level: Not reported Operable Unit: SITEWIDE Primary Responsibility: EPA Fund-Financed Planning Status: Not reported Urgency Indicator: Not reported Action Anomaly: Not reported TC3042100.2s Page 15 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 1000114961 Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: 001 PROPOSAL TO NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST Not reported 09/08/1983 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 002 ISSUE REQUEST LETTERS (104E) Not reported 01/01/1984 Not reported SITEWIDE Federal Enforcement Not reported Not reported Not reported 001 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 05/01/1984 05/01/1984 Not reported BALDWIN PARK EPA Fund-Financed Primary Not reported Not reported 0001 Commitment 08/08/2007 387.00000 2007 0002 Commitment 08/27/2007 723.00000 2007 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 09/22/2007 Financial Amount: 723.00000 Financial Year: 2007 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Decommitment Fin. Transaction Date: 09/22/2007 Financial Amount: 723.00000 Financial Year: 2007 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 TC3042100.2s Page 16 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000114961 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) 09/22/2007 723.00000 2007 0001 Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 09/22/2007 Financial Amount: 723.00000 Financial Year: 2007 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 10/02/2007 Financial Amount: 329.00000 Financial Year: 2008 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Decommitment Fin. Transaction Date: 10/02/2007 Financial Amount: 329.00000 Financial Year: 2008 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 10/03/2007 Financial Amount: 329.00000 Financial Year: 2008 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 10/03/2007 Financial Amount: 329.00000 Financial Year: 2008 Financial Transaction ID: 0003 Transaction Type: Decommitment Fin. Transaction Date: 11/09/2007 Financial Amount: 58.00000 Financial Year: 2008 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Extramural Deoutlay (Credit) Fin. Transaction Date: 04/28/2010 Financial Amount: 329.00000 Financial Year: 2010 — Financial Transaction ID: 0003 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 04/28/2010 Financial Amount: 723.00000 Financial Year: 2010 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Extramural Deoutlay (Credit) --1 Fin. Transaction Date: 04/28/2010 Financial Amount: 723.00000 TC3042100.2s Page 17 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) Financial Year: 2010 Financial Transaction ID: 0004 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 04/28/2010 Financial Amount: 329.00000 Financial Year: 2010 Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000114961 Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: 001 FINAL LISTING ON NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST Not reported 05/08/1984 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 003 ISSUE REQUEST LETTERS (104E) Not reported 12/30/1988 Not reported SITEWIDE Federal Enforcement Not reported Not reported Not reported 006 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 05/07/1990' Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 007 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 06/07/1990 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 004 ISSUE REQUEST LETTERS (104E) Not reported 06/08/1990 Not reported TC3042100.2s Page 18 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 1000114961 Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: SITE WIDE Federal Enforcement Not reported Not reported Not reported 008 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 07/09/1990 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 014 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 09/20/1990 Not reported SITEWIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 016 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 10/12/1990 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 017 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 12/05/1990 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 018 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 12/06/1990 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed TC3042100.2s Page 19 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) Planning Status: Not reported Urgency Indicator: Not reported Action Anomaly: Not reported 1000114961 Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: 019 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 12/07/1990 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 001 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 02/07/1991 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 002 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 03/06/1991 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 009 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 07/09/1991 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 015 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 09/26/1991 Not reported SITEWIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000114961 Action Anomaly: Not reported Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: 001 ADMINISTATIVENOLUNTARY COST RECOVERY Not reported 09/30/1991 Not reported SITEWIDE Federal Enforcement Primary Not reported Not reported REMOVAL ASSESSMENT 12/27/1991 12/27/1991 Not reported SITEWIDE EPA Fund-Financed Primary Not reported Not reported 001 RISK/HEALTH ASSESSMENT Not reported 09/16/1992 Not reported BALDWIN PARK EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Not reported 09/16/1992 Not reported BALDWIN PARK EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 002 Special Notice Issued Not reported 05/26/1993 Not reported SITEWIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported TC3042100.2s Page Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 1000114961 Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: 010 Notice Letters lssuec Not reported 08/04/1993 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 013 Notice Letters Issued Not reported 08/27/1993 Not reported SITE WIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported 001 Special Notice Issued Not reported 02/03/1994 Not reported SITEWIDE EPA Fund-Financed Not reported Not reported Not reported RECORD OF DECISION Not reported 03/31/1994 Not reported BALDWIN PARK EPA Fund-Financed Primary Not reported Not reported Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: 001 COMBINED REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY 08/01/1987 03/31/1994 Not reported BALDWIN PARK EPA Fund-Financed Primary Not reported Not reported 0005 Commitment 08/30/1990 TC3042100.2s Page 22 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 1000114961 Financial Amount: 55000.00000 Financial Year: 1990 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Open Commitment Fin. Transaction Date: 08/30/1990 Financial Amount: 55000.00000 Financial Year: 1990 Financial Transaction ID: 0007 Transaction Type: Commitment Fin. Transaction Date: 09/17/1991 Financial Amount: 295000.00000 Financial Year: 1991 Financial Transaction ID: 0006 Transaction Type: Commitment Fin. Transaction Date: 09/17/1991 Financial Amount: 600000.00000 Financial Year: 1991 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Open Commitment Fin. Transaction Date: 09/30/1991 Financial Amount: 305000.00000 Financial Year: 1991 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Decommitment Fin. Transaction Date: 09/30/1991 Financial Amount: 600000.00000 Financial Year: 1991 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Decommitment Fin. Transaction Date: 09/3011991 Financial Amount: 295000.00000 Financial Year: 1991 Financial Transaction ID: 0004 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 09/30/1991 Financial Amount: 600000.00000 Financial Year: 1991 Financial Transaction ID: 0003 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 09/30/1991 Financial Amount: 295000.00000 Financial Year: 1991 Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: 0002 Commitment 05/07/1993 974.00000 1993 TC3042100.2s Page 23 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) Financial Transaction ID: 0003 Transaction Type: Decommitment Fin. Transaction Date: 05/07/1993 Financial Amount: 974.00000 Financial Year: 1993 Financial Transaction ID: 0008 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 07/01/1993 Financial Amount: 974.00000 Financial Year: 1993 Financial Transaction ID 0016 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 07/29/1999 Financial Amount: 14457.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0008 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 07/30/1999 Financial Amount: 14457.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0007 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 07/30/1999 Financial Amount: 14457.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0009 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 09/14/1999 Financial Amount: 31.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0003 Transaction Type: Extramural Deoutlay (Credit) Fin. Transaction Date: 09/14/1999 Financial Amount: 31.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0017 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 09/14/1999 Financial Amount: 31.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Yaar 0015 Actual Obligation 10/07/1999 226.00000 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0005 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 10/08/1999 TC3042100.2s Page 24 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 1000114961 Financial Amount: 226.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0007 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 10/08/1999 Financial Amount: 226.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID 0013 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 10/25/1999 Financial Amount: 11788.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0006 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 10/25/1999 Financial Amount: 11788.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0006 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 10/25/1999 Financial Amount: 11788.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID 0002 Transaction Type: Extramural Deoutlay (Credit) Fin. Transaction Date: 10/27/1999 Financial Amount: 11788.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0005 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 10/27/1999 Financial Amount: 11788.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0014 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 10/27/1999 Financial Amount: 11788.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0004 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 10/27/1999 Financial Amount: 11788.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0004 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 12/07/1999 Financial Amount: 61.00000 Financial Year: 2000 TC3042100.2s Page 25 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000114961 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Extramural Deoutlay (Credit) Fin. Transaction Date: 12/07/1999 Financial Amount: 61.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0012 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 12/07/1999 Financial Amount: 61.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID 0011 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 02/02/2000 Financial Amount: 40045.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0003 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 02/02/2000 Financial Amount: 40045.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID 0003 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 02/02/2000 Financial Amount: 40045.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 03/09/2000 Financial Amount: 380.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 03/09/2000 Financial Amount: 380.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID 0010 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 03/09/2000 Financial Amount: 380.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0009 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 04/04/2000 Financial Amount: 399.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 04/04/2000 Map ID MAP FINDINGS. Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 1000114961 Financial Amount: 399.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 04/04/2000 Financial Amount: 399.00000 Financial Year: 2000 Action Code: Action: Date Started: Date Completed: Priority Level: Operable Unit: Primary Responsibility: Planning Status: Urgency Indicator: Action Anomaly: Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: 001 NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST RESPONSIBLE PARTY SEARCH 09/30/1984 07/01/1994 Not reported SITE WIDE Federal Enforcement Primary Not reported Not reported 0001 Extramural Deoutlay (Credit) 03/26/1998 812.00000 1998 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 03/26/1998 Financial Amount: 812.00000 Financial Year: 1998 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 03/26/1998 Financial Amount: 812.00000 Financial Year: 1998 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 01/13/1999 Financial Amount: 85.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 01/14/1999 Financial Amount: 85.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 01/14/1999 Financial Amount: 85.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0003 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation TC3042100.2s Page 27 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 1000114961 Fin. Transaction Date: 03/09/1999 Financial Amount: 601.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: 0003 Deobligation 03/10/1999 601.00000 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0002 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 03/10/1999 Financial Amount: 601.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0005 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 03/25/1999 Financial Amount: 168.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0005 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 03/26/1999 Financial Amount: 168.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0003 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 03/26/1999 Financial Amount: 168.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: 0006 Actual Obligation 04/23/1999 137.00000 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0006 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 04/23/1999 Financial Amount: 137.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0003 Transaction Type: Extramural Deoutlay (Credit) Fin. Transaction Date: 04/23/1999 Financial Amount: 137.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: 0002 Extramural Deoutlay (Credit) 06/09/1999 131.00000 1999 TC3042100.2s Page 28 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000114961 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: 0004 Actual Obligation 06/09/1999 131.00000 1999 0004 Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 06/09/1999 Financial Amount: 131.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0007 Transaction Type: Actual Obligation Fin. Transaction Date: 07/29/1999 Financial Amount: 2234.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID: 0007 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 07/30/1999 Financial Amount: 2234.00000 Financial Year: 1999 Financial Transaction ID Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Financial Year: 0004 Extramural Outlay (Payment) 07/30/1999 2234.00000 1999 1 --1 Financial 1 Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: Fin. Transaction Date: Financial Amount: Year: Financial Transaction ID: Transaction Type: 0001 Commitment 05/20/2005 15000.00000 2005 0008 Actual Obligation i Fin. Transaction Date: 06/02/2005 Financial Amount: 15000.00000 Financial Year: 2005 Financial Transaction ID: 0001 Transaction Type: Decommitment Fin. Transaction Date: 06/02/2005 Financial Amount: 15000.00000 — Financial Year: 2005 Financial Transaction ID: 0005 Transaction Type: Extramural Outlay (Payment) Fin. Transaction Date: 07/21/2005 Financial Amount: 2513.00000 Financial Year: 2005 Financial Transaction ID: 0008 Transaction Type: Deobligation Fin. Transaction Date: 07/21/2005 TC3042100.2s Page 29 APPENDIX C Hydrology Study Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 HYDROLOGY STUDY for APN: 8474-001-906 West Covina, CA 91790 Prepared for: PARKWAY INVESTMENT, LLC 17528 E. ROWLAND STREET CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748 Preparation Date July 12, 2011 Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 Introduction The project site is located at the East side of West Covina Parkway, at the corner of West Covina Parkway and W. Garvey Ave. South, in the City of West Covina, County of Los Angeles, and State of California. Most of the project site has an existing drainage pattern going toward southwest. No off-site drainage for this project. Only small portion of the project site sheet flow to either West Covina Parkway or W. Garvey Ave. South. The new development will propose a series of v-gutter to drain the runoff from landscaping area and parking lot to driveway then to the street. Existing Condition The re-grade portion of project site is approximately 2.216 acres compose mostly of driveway, parking lot and landscaping area. Proposed Condition This project will propose a new building, parking lot and landscaping area on the currently parking lot, walkway and landscaping area. About 82.34% of the site will be covered with impervious material such as parking space and driveways. Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 EXISTING: Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 PROPOSED: DATA: SECTION (C.F.S.) A 1 (= 0.497ACRE) 1.79 A 2 (= 0.174ACRE) 0.63 A 3 (= 0.279ACRE) 1.00 A 4 (= 1.12ACRE) 4.03 A 5 (= 0.146ACRE) 0.53 A TOTAL (= 2.216ACRE) 7.98 *Refer to Hydrology Analysis Map (C-2& C-3) Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 Provide on-site infiltration trench: 1. AREA 1: Use 3’Wx 155’Lx 4.7’ D trench Provide area for Infiltration = (3+4.7x2)x 155= 1922 s.f. I = Infiltration rate: =0.077 ft/hr The Amount (Q) will infiltrate into soil Q=0.077/3600 x 1922 = 0.041 c.f.s. 2. AREA 2: Use 3’Wx 77.2’Lx 4.7’D trench Provide area for Infiltration = (3+4.7x2)x 77.2= 957 s.f. I = Infiltration rate: =0.077 ft/hr The Amount (Q) will infiltrate into soil Q=0.077/3600 x 957 = 0.020 c.f.s. 3. AREA 3: Use 3’Wx 77.2’Lx 4.7D trench Provide area for Infiltration = (3+4.7x2)x 77.2= 957 s.f. I = Infiltration rate: =0.077 ft/hr The Amount (Q) will infiltrate into soil Q=0.077/3600 x 957 = 0.020 c.f.s. 4. AREA 4: Use 5’Wx 235’Lx 4.7’D trench Provide area for Infiltration = (5+4.7x2)x 235= 3384s.f. I = Infiltration rate: =0.077 ft/hr The Amount (Q) will infiltrate into soil Q=0.077/3600 x 3384 = 0.072c.f.s. 5. AREA 5: Use 3’Wx 80’Lx 4.7’D trench Provide area for Infiltration = (3+4.7x2)x 80= 992s.f. I = Infiltration rate: =0.077 ft/hr The Amount (Q) will infiltrate into soil Q=0.077/3600 x 992 = 0.021c.f.s. Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 6. TOTAL AREA : The Amount (Q) will infiltrate into soil Q=0.041+0.020+0.020+0.072+0.021= 0.174c.f.s. Conclusion Pre-Development Q50 =7.89 c.f.s. Post-Development Q50 =7.98 –0.174= 7.806 c.f.s. No extra run-off generated by development Will not affect existing storm drain system after development Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 07/13/11 APPENDIX D Preliminary Geotechnical Report Cal Land Engineering, Inc. dba Quartech Consultants Geotechnical, Environmental, and Civil Engineering 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 April 18, 2011 Parkway Investment, LLC. 17528 Rowland Street City of Industry, California 91748 Attention: Mr. Nick Sun Subject: Report of Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Proposed Office Development, Southeast Corner of Garvey Avenue and West Covina Parkway, APN: 8474-001- 906, West Covina, California; QCI Project No.: 10-051-004GE Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, Quartech Consultants (QCI) is pleased to submit this Geotechnical Engineering Report for the subject site. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the subsurface conditions and provide recommendations for foundation designs and other relevant parameters of the proposed construction. Based on the findings and observations during our investigation, the proposed construction of the subject site for the intended use is considered feasible from the geotechnical engineering viewpoints, provided that specific recommendations set forth herein are followed. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions pertaining to this report, please call the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Cal Land Engineering, Inc. (CLE) dba Quartech Consultants (QCI) Jack C. Lee, GE 2153 Abe Kazemzadeh Principal Project Engineer Dist: (4) Addressee REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION Proposed Office Development At APN: 8474-001-906 Southeast Corner of Garvey Avenue and West Covina Parkway West Covina, California Prepared by QUARTECH CONSULTANTS (QCI) Project No.: 10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 1 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................3 1.1 PURPOSE.................................................................................................................................................3 1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES................................................................................................................................3 1.3 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION......................................................................................................................3 1.4 SITE LOCATION ........................................................................................................................................3 2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING..........................................................4 2.1 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION .....................................................................................................................4 2.2 LABORATORY TESTING .............................................................................................................................4 3.0 SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS....................................................................................4 3.1 SOIL CONDITIONS.....................................................................................................................................4 3.2 GROUNDWATER .......................................................................................................................................4 4.0 SEISMICITY ..............................................................................................................................................5 4.1 FAULTING.................................................................................................................................................5 4.2 SEISMICITY ..............................................................................................................................................5 4.3 ESTIMATED EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS ............................................................................................6 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS.................................................................................................................................6 5.1 LIQUEFACTION..........................................................................................................................................6 5.2 EARTHQUAKE INDUCED SETTLEMENT ........................................................................................................6 5.3 LANDSLIDING............................................................................................................................................7 5.4 LURCHING................................................................................................................................................7 5.5 SURFACE RUPTURE..................................................................................................................................7 5.6 GROUND SHAKING....................................................................................................................................7 6.0 CONCLUSIONS.........................................................................................................................................7 6.1 SEISMICITY ..............................................................................................................................................8 6.2 LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL ........................................................................................................................8 6.3 EXCAVATABILITY.......................................................................................................................................8 6.4 SURFICIAL SOIL REMOVAL ........................................................................................................................8 6.5 GROUNDWATER .......................................................................................................................................8 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................................8 7.1 GRADING .................................................................................................................................................8 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 2 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 7.1.1 Site Preparation ..............................................................................................................................8 7.1.2 Surficial Soil Removals ...................................................................................................................9 7.1.3 Treatment of Removal Bottoms ......................................................................................................9 7.1.4 Structural Backfill ............................................................................................................................9 7.2 FOUNDATION DESIGN ...............................................................................................................................9 7.2.1 Bearing Value..................................................................................................................................9 7.2.2 Settlement.....................................................................................................................................10 7.2.3 Lateral Resistance ........................................................................................................................10 7.2.4 Foundation Construction...............................................................................................................10 7.2.5 Concrete Flatwork.........................................................................................................................10 7.3 TEMPORARY TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL ...................................................................................10 8.0 INSPECTION..........................................................................................................................................11 9.0 SEISMIC DESIGN...................................................................................................................................11 10.0 CORROSION POTENTIAL ..................................................................................................................12 11.0 PAVEMENT DESIGN ...........................................................................................................................12 11.1 ASPHALT PAVEMENT ............................................................................................................................12 11.2 CONCRETE PAVEMENT .........................................................................................................................12 12.0 PLAN REVIEW......................................................................................................................................13 13.0 REMARKS............................................................................................................................................13 14.0 REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................13 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 3 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose This report presents a summary of our preliminary geotechnical engineering investigation for the proposed construction at the subject site. The purposes of this investigation were to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the area of proposed construction and to provide recommendations pertinent to grading, foundation design and other relevant parameters of the development. 1.2 Scope of Services Our scope of services included: • Review of available soil engineering data of the area. • Subsurface exploration consisting of logging and sampling of four 8-inch diameter hollow stem auger borings to a maximum depth of 51.5 feet below the existing grade at the subject site. The exploration was logged by a QCI engineer. Boring log is presented in Appendix A. • Laboratory testing of representative samples to establish engineering characteristics of the on-site soil. The laboratory test results are presented in Appendices A and B. • Engineering analyses of the geotechnical data obtained from our background studies, field investigation, and laboratory testing. • Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and recommendations for the proposed construction. 1.3 Proposed Construction The subject site would be used for office building and associated improvements. The proposed building is anticipated to be four-story in height with concrete slab-on-grade. Column loads are unknown at this time, but are expected to be medium. No detailed structural plans and structural loads were available at the time when this report was prepared. 1.4 Site Location The project site is located on southeast corner of Garvey Avenue and West Covina Parkway in the City of West Covina, California. The approximate location of the site is presented in the attached Site Location Map (Figure 1). The proposed building pad is bounded on the north by Garvey Avenue, on the south/southwest by West Covina Parkway, and on the east/southeast by the existing parking and drive areas. Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 4 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 The site is relatively flat with difference in elevation over the front portion of the proposed building pad approximately 1-3 feet. At the time of our field investigation, the northern/northwestern portion is vacant and covered by relatively dense vegetation. However, it is understood that the northern/northwestern portion of the area is covered by the previously placed fills to an approximately height of 20 feet above the adjacent relatively flat area. No major surface erosions were observed during our subsurface exploration. Error! No index entries found. 2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 2.1 Subsurface Exploration Our subsurface exploration consisted of four 8-inch diameter hollow stem auger borings to a maximum depth of 51.5 feet at the locations shown on the attached Site Plan, Figure 2. The drilling of the boring was supervised and logged by a QCI’s engineer. Relatively undisturbed and bulk samples were collected for laboratory testing. In addition, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) was also conducted during drilling of the boring. Boring logs are presented in Appendix A. 2.2 Laboratory Testing Representative samples were tested for the following parameters: in-situ moisture content and density, consolidation, direct shear strength, percent of fine, expansion and corrosion potential. Results of our laboratory testing along with a summary of the testing procedures are presented in Appendix B. In-situ moisture and density test results are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A. 3.0 SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Soil Conditions The onsite near surface soils consist predominantly of silty fine sand (SM). In general, these soils exist in medium dense condition. Underlying the surface soils, silty sand (SM), medium grained sand and silty sand (SP-SM) and medium to coarse grained sand (SP), were disclosed in the borings to the depths explored (51.5 feet). These soils exist in the dense to very dense and slightly moist, conditions. The soils become denser as depth increases. 3.2 Groundwater No groundwater was encountered in the borings to the depths explored. Based on our review of Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 5 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 the “Historically Highest Ground Water Contours and Borehole Log Data Locations, Baldwin Park Quadrangle”, by CDMG, it is estimated that the highest ground water level is approximately 70 to 80 feet below the existing grade. It should be noted that the CDMG ground water map is obtained by evaluating technical publications, geotechnical borehole data, water-well logs dating back to the “turn-of-the-century”. This report also indicated that ground water levels in the areas from 1960-1997 data are generally 5 to 50 feet deeper than the earlier measured data. No specific date was provided pertaining to the high ground water level. 4.0 SEISMICITY 4.1 Faulting Based on our study, there are no known active faults crossing the property. The nearest known active regional fault is the San Jose Fault zones located approximately 2.4 miles from the site. 4.2 Seismicity The subject site is located in southern California, which is a tectonically active area. The type and magnitude of seismic hazards affecting the site depend on the distance to causative faults, the intensity, and the magnitude of the seismic event. Table 1 indicates the distance of the fault zones and the associated maximum magnitude earthquake that can be produced by nearby seismic events. As indicated in Table 1, the San Jose fault zones are considered to have the most significant effect to the site from a design standpoint. TABLE 1 Characteristics and Estimated Earthquakes for Regional Faults Fault Name Approximate Distance to the Site (mile) Maximum Magnitude Earthquake (Mmax) San Jose 2.4 6.4 Elysian Park Thrust 3.4 6.7 Sierra Madre 5.5 7.2 Puente Hills Blind Thrust 7.0 7.1 Whittier 7.1 6.8 Raymond 7.7 6.5 Clamshell-Sawpit 8.2 6.5 Chino-Central Ave. (Elsinore) 9.1 6.7 Upper Elysian Park 9.4 6.6 Cucamonga 12.5 6.9 Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 6 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 4.3 Estimated Earthquake Ground Motions In order to estimate the seismic ground motions at the subject site, QCI has utilized the seismic hazard map published by California Geological Survey. According to this report, the peak ground alluvium acceleration at the subject site for a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years is about 0.494g (California Geological Survey, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Mapping Ground Motion). This report also indicates that the subject site is located within a zone where the magnitude range is 6.5-7.0. 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS 5.1 Liquefaction Liquefaction is the transformation of a granular material from a solid to a liquid state as a result of increasing pore-water pressure. The material will then loses strength and can flow if unrestrained, thus leading to ground failure. Liquefaction can be triggered in saturated cohesionless material by short-term cyclic loading, such as shaking due to an earthquake. Ground failure that results from liquefaction can be manifested as flow landsliding, lateral spread, loss of bearing capacity, or settlement. The potential for liquefaction at the site’s sandy soil was evaluated using the computer program “LIQUEFY2” by Thomas Blake, the subsurface data from Boring B-1 and B-2, the design earthquake (M =7.0), and ground acceleration of 0.494g as are discussed in the previous Section. The total unit weight used for the onsite soils is 120 pcf. The calculated ground water level is raised to the depth of 5 feet below the existing ground surface. The analyses presented on the enclosed Appendix C indicated that the underlying sandy materials have relatively high safety factors against liquefaction. Therefore, the liquefaction potential of the underlying materials is considered to be low or remote under the design earthquake events (Youd and others, 2001). 5.2 Earthquake Induced Settlement The sandy soils tend to settle and densify when they are subjected to earthquake shaking. Should the sand be saturated and there is no possibility for drainage so that constant volume conditions are maintained, the primary effect of the shaking is the generation of excess pore water pressures. Settlement then occurs as the excess pore pressures dissipate. The primary factors controlling seismic induced settlement are the cyclic stress ratio, maximum shear strain induced by earthquake, the strength and density of the sand, and the magnitude of the Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 7 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 earthquake. Based on the procedures developed by Tokimatsu and Seed on 1987, it is our opinion that liquefaction induced settlement is negligible. 5.3 Landsliding A potential for landsliding is often suggested in areas of moderate to steep terrain that is underlain by weak or un-favorably oriented geological conditions. Neither of these conditions exists at the site. Due to the relatively flat nature of the site, it is our opinion that the potential for landslide is remote. 5.4 Lurching Soil lurching refers to the rolling motion on the surface due to the passage of seismic surface waves. Effects of this nature are not considered significant on the subject site where the thickness of alluvium does not vary appreciably under structures. 5.5 Surface Rupture Surface rupture is a break in the ground surface during or as a consequence of seismic activity. The potential for surface rupture on the subject site is considered low due to the absence of known active faults at the site. 5.6 Ground Shaking Throughout southern California, ground shaking, as a result of earthquakes, is a constant potential hazard. The relative potential for damage from this hazard is a function of the type and magnitude of earthquake events and the distance of the subject site from the event. Accordingly, proposed structures should be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable portions of the building code. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our subsurface investigation, it is our opinion that the proposed construction is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations contained herein are incorporated in the design and construction. The following is a summary of the geotechnical design and construction factors that may affect the development of the site: Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 8 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 6.1 Seismicity Based on our studies on seismicity, there are no known active faults crossing the property. However, the site is located in a seismically active region and is subject to seismically induced ground shaking from nearby and distant faults, which is a characteristic of all Southern California. 6.2 Liquefaction Potential Based on our field investigation and laboratory testing, it is our opinion that liquefaction and related hazards are unlikely at the subject site under the design event. 6.3 Excavatability Based on our subsurface investigation, excavation of the subsurface materials should be able to be accomplished with conventional earthwork equipment. 6.4 Surficial Soil Removal The near surface soils are relatively dry and vary in density. In order to provide a uniform support for the foundation, it is recommended the existing soil be removed and backfilled with compacted fill to a minimum depth of 4 feet below the existing grade to provide a uniform support of the structures. 6.5 Groundwater No groundwater was encountered in the borings to the depths explored. In our opinion, groundwater will not be a problem during the near surface construction. 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations should be incorporated into the design or construction phases. 7.1 Grading 7.1.1 Site Preparation Prior to initiating grading operations, any existing vegetation, organic soil, trash, debris, over- sized materials (greater than 8 inches), and other deleterious materials within fill areas should be removed from the site. Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 9 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 7.1.2 Surficial Soil Removals Based on our field exploration and laboratory data obtained to date, it is recommended that the surficial soils be removed to a depth of 4 feet below existing grade or 2 foot below the bottom of the footing, whichever is deeper. The recommended removal should be extended at least 5 feet beyond building lines or to the limits of the existing building. The existing near surface soils should also be removed at least one foot within the proposed driveway areas. The previously placed fill at the northern/northwestern portion of the proposed building pad should be removed entirely to expose competent naturals soils under the direction of the project geotechnical engineer. Locally deeper removals may be necessary to expose competent natural ground. The actual removal depths should be determined in the field as conditions are exposed. Visual inspection and/or testing may be used to define removal requirements. 7.1.3 Treatment of Removal Bottoms Soils exposed within areas approved for fill placement should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, conditioned to near optimum moisture content, then compacted in-place to minimum project standards. 7.1.4 Structural Backfill The onsite soils may be used as compacted fill provided they are free of organic materials and debris. Fills should be placed in relatively thin lifts; brought to near optimum moisture content, then compacted to obtain at least 90 percent relative compaction based on laboratory standard ASTM D-1557-09. 7.2 Foundation Design 7.2.1 Bearing Value An allowable bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used for design of shallow continuous footings 18 inches wide and 24 inches deep, and shallow pad footings at least 24 square inch and 24 inches deep. This value may be increased by 200 pounds per square foot for each additional foot of depth or width to a maximum value of 3000 pounds per square foot. This value may be increased by one-third when considering short duration seismic or wind loads. Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 10 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 7.2.2 Settlement Settlement of the footings placed as recommended, and subject to no more than allowable loads is not expected to exceed 3/4 inch. Differential settlement between adjacent columns is not anticipated to exceed 1/4 inch for the adjacent column spaced at a distance of about 30 feet. 7.2.3 Lateral Resistance The active earth pressure to be utilized for cantilever retaining wall designs may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 35 pounds per cubic foot when the slope of the backfill behind the wall is level. Passive earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pounds per cubic foot, with a maximum earth pressure of 3000 pounds per square foot. An allowable coefficient of friction between soil and concrete of 0.30 may be used with the dead load forces. When combining passive pressure and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one-third. 7.2.4 Foundation Construction It is anticipated that the entire structure will be underlain by onsite soils of very low expansion potential. All footings should be founded at a minimum depth of 24 inches below the lowest adjacent ground surface. All continuous footings should have at least two No. 4 reinforcing bars placed both at the top and two No. 4 reinforcing bars placed at the bottom of the footings. 7.2.5 Concrete Flatwork Concrete slabs and concrete flatwork should be a minimum of 4 inches thick and reinforced with a minimum of No. 4 bars at 18-inches in center both ways or equivalent. All slab reinforcement should be supported to ensure proper positioning during placement of concrete. Concrete slabs in moisture sensitive areas should be underlain with a vapor barrier consist of a minimum of 10 mil polyvinyl chloride membrane with all laps sealed. A minimum of one inch of sand should be placed over the membrane to aid in uniform curing of concrete. 7.3 Temporary Trench Excavation and Backfill All trench excavations should conform to CAL-OSHA and local safety codes. All utility trenches backfill should be brought to near optimum moisture content and then compacted to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of ASTM D-1557-09. Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 11 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 8.0 INSPECTION As a necessary requisite to the use of this report, the following inspection is recommended: • Temporary excavations. • Removal of surficial and unsuitable soils. • Backfill placement and compaction. • Utility trench backfill. The geotechnical engineer should be notified at least 1 day in advance of the start of construction. A joint meeting between the client, the contractor, and the geotechnical engineer is recommended prior to the start of construction to discuss specific procedures and scheduling. 9.0 SEISMIC DESIGN Based on our studies on seismicity, there are no known active faults crossing the property. However, the subject site is located in southern California, which is a tectonically active area. Based on 2010 California Building Code (Chapter 16) the following seismic related values may be used: The Project Structural Engineer should be aware of the information provided above to determine if any additional structural strengthening is warranted. Seismic Parameters(Latitude:34.070205, Longitude: -117.938829) Mapped 0.2 Sec Period Spectral Acceleration Ss 1.835g Mapped 1.0 Sec Period Spectral Acceleration S1 0.702g Site Coefficient for Site Class “D”, Fa 1.0 Site Coefficient for Site Class “D”, Fv 1.5 Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at 0.2 Second, SMS 1.835g Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at 1.0 Second, SM1 1.053g Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters for 0.2 sec, SDS 1.223g Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters for 1.0 Sec, SD1 0.702g Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 12 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 10.0 CORROSION POTENTIAL Chemical laboratory tests were conducted on the existing onsite near surface materials sampled during QCI’s field investigation to aid in evaluation of soil corrosion potential and the attack on concrete by sulfate soils. The testing results are presented in Appendix B. According to CBC and ACI 318, Table 4.3.1, a “negligible” exposure to sulfate can be expected for concrete placed in contact with the onsite soils. Therefore, Type II cement or its equivalent may be used for this project. Based on the resistivity test results, it is estimated that the subsurface soils are corrosive to buried metal pipe. It is recommended that any underground steel utilities be blasted and given protective coating. Should additional protective measures be warranted, a corrosion specialist should be consulted. 11.0 PAVEMENT DESIGN 11.1 Asphalt Pavement Our preliminary structural pavement sections are designed according to Caltrans Highway Design Manual and an assumded “R”-value of 30. The following presents our preliminary pavement sections. Location Traffic index AC Thickness (inch) Base Thickness (inch) Parking Areas 4.0 3 6 Driveways 5.0 4 6 The Traffic Index of 4 is usually for the light vehicular parking area and the Traffic index of 5 is for the light traffic area. Upon completion of grading at the site, laboratory samples may be collected at sub-grade level and tested for R-value in order to verify the above recommended sections. The subgrade materials should be brought to near optimum moisture content, then compacted to at least 90 percent of ASTM D-1557-09. The Class 2 aggregate base materials should be brought to near optimum moisture content, then compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D- 1557-09. 11.2 Concrete Pavement Concrete driveway should be 5.5 inches of concrete over 4 inches of Class 2 aggregate base. Concrete driveway should be reinforced in accordance with the recommendations presented Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 13 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 above. The subgrade materials should be brought to near optimum moisture content, and then compacted to at least 90 percent of ASTM D-1557-09 to a minimum depth of 12 inches. The Class 2 aggregate base materials should be brought to near optimum moisture content, then compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D-1557-09. Adjacent landscaping should be graded to drain into local area drain and away from the pavement subgrade material. 12.0 PLAN REVIEW No detailed structural plans were available during CLE’s preparation of this report. CLE should review the foundation plans for conformance with the intent of our recommendations. Specific geological conditions related grading and/or foundation design recommendations may then be provided. 13.0 REMARKS The conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based on the findings and observations at the exploratory locations. However, soil materials may vary in characteristics between locations of the exploratory locations. If conditions are encountered during construction, which appear to be different from those disclosed by the exploratory work, this office should be notified so as to recommend the need for modifications. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No warranty is expressed or implied. This report is subject to review by controlling public agencies having jurisdiction. 14.0 REFERENCES Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F., and Chung, R.M., (1985), “Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 111, No. GT12, pp. 1425-1445. Tokimatsu, K., and Seed, H.B., (1987), “Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 113, No. 8, pp. 861-878. Ishihara, K. and Yoshimine, M., (1992), “Evaluation of Settlements in Sand Deposits Following Liquefaction During Earthquakes”, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 173-188 Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, Special Publication 117, Adopted by California State Mining and Geology Board in accordance with the Seismic Hazards Parkway Investment, LLC. Page 14 of 14 QCI Project No.:10-051-004GE April 18, 2011 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 Mapping Act of 1990, Revised and Re- adopted September 11, 2008 by the State Mining and Geology Board. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/shzp/pages/index.aspx T.Y. Loud, I.M. Idriss, and et. al. (2001), “Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils”, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 127, No. GT10, pp. 817-833. California Geological Survey “Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Mapping Ground Motion Page.” California Division of Mines and Geology, 1998, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Baldwin Park 7.5-minutes Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California Seismic Hazard Zone report 13. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/shzp/pages/index.aspx EERC, “Recent Advances in Soil Liquefaction Engineering: A Unified and Consistent Framework”, EERC Report No. 2003-06, 26th Annual ASCE Geotechnical Spring Seminar, Long Beach, April 30, 2003 www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/psha/fault_parameters/pdf/Documents/B_flt.pdf 2008 NSHMP, http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/deaggint/2008/index.php http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/software/ APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION Subsurface conditions were explored by drilling four 8-inch diameter hollow stem auger borings to a maximum depth of 51.5 feet below the existing grade at the subject site at approximate locations shown on the enclosed Site Plan, Figure 2. The drilling of the boring was supervised by a QCI’s engineer, who continuously logged the borings and visually classified the soils in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Ring and SPT samples were taken at frequent intervals. These samples were obtained by driving a sampler with successive blows of 140-pound hammer dropping from a height of 30 inches. Representative undisturbed samples of the subsurface soils were retained in a series of brass rings, each having an inside diameter of 2.42 inches and a height of 1.00 inch. All ring samples were transported to our laboratory. Bulk surface soil samples were also collected for additional classification and testing. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING During the subsurface exploration, QCI personnel collected relatively undisturbed ring samples and bulk samples. The following tests were performed on selected soil samples: Moisture-Density The moisture content and dry unit weight were determined for each relatively undisturbed soil sample obtained in the test borings in accordance with ASTM D2937 standard. The results of these tests are shown on the boring logs in Appendix A. Shear Tests Shear tests were performed in a direct shear machine of strain-control type in accordance with ASTM D3080 standard. The rate of deformation was 0.005 inch per minute. Selected samples were sheared under varying confining loads in order to determine the Coulomb shear strength parameters: internal friction angle and cohesion. The shear test results are presented in the attached plates. Consolidation Tests Consolidation tests were performed on selected undisturbed soil samples in accordance with ASTM D2435 standard. The consolidation apparatus is designed for a one-inch high soil filled brass ring. Loads are applied in several increments in a geometric progression and the resulting deformations are recorded at selected time intervals. Porous stones are placed in contact with the top and bottom of each specimen to permit addition and release of pore fluid. The samples were inundated with water at a load of two kilo-pounds (kips) per square foot, and the test results are shown on the attached Figures. Expansion Index Laboratory Expansion Index test was conducted on the existing onsite near surface materials sampled during QCI’s field investigation to aid in evaluation of soil expansion potential. The test is performed in accordance with ASTM D-4829. The testing result is presented below: Sample Location Expansion Index Expansion Potential B-1 @ 0-3’ 17 Very Low Corrosion Potential Chemical laboratory tests were conducted on the existing onsite near surface materials sampled during QCI’s field investigation to aid in evaluation of soil corrosion potential and the attack on concrete by sulfate soils. These tests are performed in accordance with California Test Method 417, 422, 532, and 643. The testing results are presented below: Sample Location pH Chloride (ppm) Sulfate (% by weight) Min. Resistivity (ohm-cm) B-1 @ 0’-3’ 7.71 76 0.0110 2,300 Percent Passing #200 Sieve Percent of soil passing #200 sieve was determined for selected soil samples in accordance with ASTM D1140 standard. The test results are presented in the following table: Sample Location % Passing #200 B-1 @ 5’,10’ & 15’ 28.1 B-1 @ 20’ 11.3 B-1 @ 20’ 25.3 B-1 @ 25’, 30’ & 35’ 4.5 B-1 @ 40’ & 45’ 25.3 B-1 @ 50’ 3.2 Sample Location % Passing #200 B-2 @ 5’& 10’ 25.1 B-2 @ 15’ & 20’ 10.3 B-2 @ 25’ ,30’, 35’,40’ 45’ & 50’ 3.0 APPENDIX C RESULTS OF LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES APPENDIX E Traffic Study Traffic Impact Study for 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) in West Covina August 3, 2011 Prepared For: Parkway Investment, LLC 17528 Rowland Street, #218 City of Industry, CA 91748 (626) 913-8939 Prepared by: 1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201 Monterey Park, California 91754 (323) 260-4703 JB01235 Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page i Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 A. PROJECT LOCATION................................................................................................................................................................. 1 B. PROJECT STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 C. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY...................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. EXISTING (2011) CONDITIONS............................................................................................................ 9 A. EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM................................................................................................................................................... 9 B. EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES ...................................................................................................................................................11 C. EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE........................................................................................................................13 3. FUTURE (2016) PRE-PROJECT CONDITIONS.................................................................................. 16 A. AMBIENT GROWTH.................................................................................................................................................................16 B. AREA PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................................................................16 C. PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ....................................................................................................................22 4. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION............................................................................................................. 25 A. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ...................................................................................................................................................25 B. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION..................................................................................................................................................25 C. PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT....................................................................................................................................................26 5. PARKING DEMAND ............................................................................................................................... 30 A. PARKING DEMAND..................................................................................................................................................................30 B. PARKING DEMAND...................................................................................................................................................................30 C. PARKING RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................................................32 6. EXISTING (2011) PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS............................................................................. 33 7. FUTURE 2016 POST-PROJECT CONDITIONS.................................................................................. 36 8. PROJECT SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS................................................................. 39 A. METHODOLOGY FOR STUDY INTERSECTION IMPACTS ........................................................................................................39 B. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS..........................................................................................................................39 9. CMP AND CALTRANS FACILITY IMPACTS..................................................................................... 42 A. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM..............................................................................................................................42 B. HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR FREEWAY RAMP INTERSECTIONS..............................................................................42 C. POTENTIAL FREEWAY IMPACTS ..............................................................................................................................................43 10. ANALYSIS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 46 Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page ii Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 List of Figures FIGURE 1 – PROJECT LOCATION 2 FIGURE 2 – PROJECT SITE PLAN 3 FIGURE 3 – STUDY INTERSECTIONS 4 FIGURE 4 – EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION 10 FIGURE 5 – EXISTING TRANSIT LINE 12 FIGURE 6 – EXISTING (2011) AM PEAK HOUR TURN VOLUMES 14 FIGURE 7 – EXISTING (2011) PM PEAK HOUR TURN VOLUMES 15 FIGURE 8 – FUTURE (2016) AMBIENT GROWTH – AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 17 FIGURE 9 – FUTURE (2016) AMBIENT GROWTH – PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 18 FIGURE 10 – LOCATION OF AREA PROJECTS 19 FIGURE 11 – AREA PROJECTS TRIP ASSIGNMENT – AM PEAK HOUR 20 FIGURE 12 – AREA PROJECTS TRIP ASSIGNMENT – PM PEAK HOUR 21 FIGURE 13 – FUTURE (2016) GROWTH WITH AREA PROJECTS – AM PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 23 FIGURE 14 – FUTURE (2016) GROWTH WITH AREA PROJECTS – PM PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 24 FIGURE 15 – PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 27 FIGURE 16 – PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT – AM PEAK-HOUR 28 FIGURE 17 – PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT – PM PEAK-HOUR 29 FIGURE 18 – EXISTING (2011) PLUS PROJECT – AM PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 34 FIGURE 19 – EXISTING (2011) PLUS PROJECT – PM PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 35 FIGURE 20 – FUTURE 2016 WITH AREA PROJECTS AND PROJECT – AM PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 37 FIGURE 21 – FUTURE 2016 WITH AREA PROJECTS AND PROJECT – PM PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 38 List of Tables TABLE 1 – LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS 7 TABLE 2 – STUDY AREA ROADWAY DESCRIPTIONS 9 TABLE 3 – EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES 11 TABLE 4 – INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE – EXISTING (2011) CONDITIONS 13 TABLE 5 – TRIP GENERATION OF INCLUDED AREA PROJECTS 16 TABLE 6 – INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FUTURE 2016 PRE-PROJECT CONDITIONS 22 TABLE 7 – PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 25 TABLE 8 – PARKING GENERATION 30 TABLE 9 – EXISTING HOURLY PARKING UTILIZATION 31 TABLE 10 – INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE EXISTING (2011) PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS 33 TABLE 11 – INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FUTURE (2016) POST-PROJECT CONDITIONS 36 TABLE 12 – DETERMINATION OF EXISTING + PROJECT IMPACTS – AM PEAK HOUR 39 TABLE 13 – DETERMINATION OF EXISTING + PROJECT IMPACTS – AM PEAK HOUR 40 TABLE 14 – DETERMINATION OF FUTURE WITH-PROJECT IMPACTS – AM PEAK HOUR 40 TABLE 15 – DETERMINATION OF FUTURE WITH-PROJECT IMPACTS – PM PEAK HOUR 41 TABLE 16 – MITIGATION MEASURE ANALYSIS – AM AND PM PEAK HOURS 41 TABLE 17 – FREEWAY RAMP INTERSECTION HCM ANALYSIS – AM AND PM PEAK HOURS 43 TABLE 18 – RECENT CALTRANS VOLUME DATA FOR I-10 IN VICINITY OF PROJECT 43 Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page iii Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 Appendices APPENDIX A – STUDY SCOPING DOCUMENT APPENDIX B – TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX C – STUDY INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS – EXISTING (2011) CONDITIONS APPENDIX D – STUDY INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS – FUTURE (2012) PRE-PROJECT CONDITIONS APPENDIX E – STUDY INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS – EXISTING (2011) PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS APPENDIX F – STUDY INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS – FUTURE (2016) POST-PROJECT CONDITIONS APPENDIX G – RAMP CAPACITY AND QUEUING ANLAYSIS SPREADSHEETS Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page iv Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 1 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 1. Introduction This study report identifies the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed Parkway Corporate Center (Project) in the City of West Covina, located at 1607 West Covina Parkway. KOA Corporation was retained by Parkway Investment, LLC to study the traffic impacts of the proposed Project. The new four-story building would provide a total of approximately 55,361 square feet of medical-office space within a new private parcel adjacent to the West Covina Civic Center, and would not replace any existing uses. Site access and parking would be provided via a reciprocal parking agreement with the City of West Covina. An additional driveway would be constructed along Garvey Avenue South (north side of the site). The modification and expansion of the adjacent parking area would provide up to 201 spaces. The following sections examine the potential impacts of Project-generated vehicle trips on weekday peak-hour operations at nearby signalized intersections. Prior to the start of the study, KOA coordinated with staff from the City of West Covina to obtain consensus on the traffic scope, methodology and assumptions. An initial scoping document was prepared and submitted to the City of West Covina Engineer for review and comment. A. Project Location The proposed Project site is located to the north of the City Library, with an address of 1607 West Covina Parkway. The site is at southeast corner of West Covina Parkway and Garvey Avenue South, and would be purchased from the Clay of West Covina, as it is currently an open landscaped area of the Civic Center. The Project access driveway would be located on West Covina Parkway, and a new driveway would be constructed along Garvey Avenue South. Figure 1 illustrates the study area and the site location in relation to the surrounding street system. B. Project Study Area For the Project traffic impact analysis, six study intersections were defined for the overall study area: 1. Pacific Avenue & Cameron Avenue 2. Pacific Avenue & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Avenue N 3. Pacific Avenue–West Covina Parkway & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Avenue S 4. West Covina Parkway & Toluca Avenue 5. Sunset Avenue & West Covina Parkway 6. Sunset Avenue & Plaza Drive Figure 2 illustrates the proposed Project site plan, including the expansion of adjacent parking areas. Figure 3 illustrates the locations of the six study intersections. Project LocationFigure 1N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10LEGENDProject Location Project Site PlanFigure 2N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456 Study IntersectionsFigure 3N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456LEGENDProject LocationXStudy Intersections Introduction Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 5 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 C. Analysis Methodology The proposed Project site is located within the City of West Covina. KOA coordinated with the City at the start of this study to achieve consensus on assumptions such as study intersections, ambient growth and area/cumulative projects. A scoping document was prepared and submitted to the City of West Covina for review and comment. A copy of the scoping document is provided in Appendix A, although its details have been superceded. The Project study area extents, as defined through consultation with City staff, included weekday peak- hour impact analysis at six study intersections. Traffic impacts were analyzed during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours at the study intersections. The traffic analysis included the following scenarios: • Existing (2011) Conditions • Future (2016) Pre-Project Conditions • Future (2016) Post-Project Conditions • Existing (2011) Plus Project Conditions An additional existing plus Project scenario was included in the analysis, to comply with ruling on the recent Sunnyvale Court Case. The TRAFFIX software was used by KOA Corporation to perform the analysis of level of service at the study intersections. Existing 2011 Conditions Fieldwork within the Project study area was undertaken to identify the condition of major roadways, to identify traffic control, approach lane configuration, and other characteristics of each study intersection. KOA compiled new manual intersection turn movement counts that were conducted at the study intersections on March 8th (Tuesday) of 2011 between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The results of the counts were utilized to determine existing weekday a.m. and p.m. peak- hour conditions. Traffic count summaries are provided in Appendix B of this report. Existing level of service values at the study intersections are discussed within Section 2 of this report. Future 2016 Pre-Project Conditions In order to acknowledge regional traffic growth that would affect operations at the study intersections during the anticipated Project completion year of 2016, an ambient/background traffic growth rate was applied. Per the scoping document, an annual rate of 1% was utilized to create year-2016 base traffic volumes. Introduction Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 6 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 In addition to future ambient growth, traffic from area projects (approved and pending developments) was also included as part of the year-2016 analysis. KOA obtained information from planning staff at the City of West Covina pertaining to area projects that would add measurable volumes to the study area intersections and are located within the City. Peak-hour trips that would be generated from each of the area projects were computed based on Trip Generation (8th edition), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Operations at the study intersections for the future pre-project scenario are discussed in Section 3 of this report. Project Trip Generation and Distribution Project trip generation calculations included rates for medical-dental office use established by Trip Generation. The methodology utilized for Project trip generation and distribution calculations is discussed in Section 4 of this report. Level of Service Methodology For analysis of Level of Service (LOS) at signalized intersections, the City of West Covina has designated the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology as the desired tool. The concept of roadway level of service under the ICU methodology is calculated as the volume of vehicles that pass through the facility divided by the capacity of that facility. A 10% adjustment to the clearance and loss time factor based on the critical phases of the signalized control were included in the traffic analysis. A facility is “at capacity” (ICU value of 1.00 or greater) when extreme congestion occurs. This value is a function of hourly volumes, signal phasing, and approach lane configuration on each leg of the intersection. Level of service (LOS) values range from LOS A to LOS F. LOS A indicates excellent operating conditions with little delay to motorists, whereas LOS F represents congested conditions with excessive vehicle delay. The upper range of LOS E is typically defined as the operating “capacity” of a roadway. Table 1 provides descriptions of general roadway operations for each LOS value, as defined within the Highway Capacity Manual (published by the Transportation Research Board). Introduction Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 7 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 Table 1 – Level of Service Definitions Level of Service Flow Conditions Volume to Capacity Ratio A LOS A describes primarily free-flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free-flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Stopped delay at signalized intersections is minimal. 0.00-0.600 B LOS B represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free-flow speed for the arterial classification. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are not generally subjected to appreciable tension. 0.601-0.700 C LOS C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in mid-block locations may be more restricted than at LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average speeds of about 50 percent of the average free-flow speed for the arterial classification. Motorists will experience appreciable tension while driving. 0.701-0.800 D LOS D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause a substantial increase in delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these factors. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free-flow speed. 0.801-0.900 E LOS E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of one- third the free-flow speed of less. Such operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. 0.901-1.00 F LOS F characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds below one-third to one-fourth of the free-flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays and extensive queuing. Adverse progression is frequently a contributor to this condition. Over 1.00 Significant Traffic Impacts Traffic impacts are identified if a proposed development will result in a significant change in traffic conditions at a study intersection. A significant impact is typically identified if project-related traffic will cause service levels to deteriorate beyond a threshold limit specified by the overseeing agency. Impacts can also be significant if an intersection is already operating below acceptable level of service values and project traffic will cause a further decline below a threshold. Introduction Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 8 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 As defined by City of West Covina traffic study review policies, significant impacts of a proposed project at an intersection must be mitigated to a level of insignificance. In cases where capacity increases are possible, KOA analyzed mitigation measures that would restore operations commensurate with the removal of the incremental impacts of the Project. The City significant impact standard is as follows: Significant Project Traffic Impact Threshold Level of Service Volume/Capacity Ratio Project-Related Increase in V/C D to F 0.800 or greater Equal to or greater than 0.02 Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 9 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 2. Existing (2011) Conditions This section describes the existing conditions within the study area, in terms of roadway facilities and operational characteristics. A. Existing Roadway System Fieldwork within the Project study area was undertaken to identify traffic control and approach lane configuration at each study intersection, and to identify the locations of on-street parking availability and the locations of transit stops. The discussion presented here is limited to specific roadways that traverse the study intersections and serve the Project site. Primary roadways within the study area are described below in Table 2. Figure 4 illustrates the existing approach lane and signalized control configurations of the study intersections. Table 2 – Study Area Roadway Descriptions Median General Posted Segment NB / EB SB / WB Type NB / EB SB / WB Land Use Speed Limit Pacific Avenue - north of Cameron Ave 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted Residential 40 MPH West Covina Parkway - north of Toluca Ave 2 2 Divided No Parking Permitted Commercial 35 MPH West Covina Parkway - south of Toluca Ave 2 2 Divided No Parking No Parking Commercial 35 MPH West Covina Parkway - east of Sunset Ave 2 2 Divided No Parking Anytime No Parking Anytime Commercial 35 MPH Sunset Avenue 2 2 Median No Parking No Parking Commercial 40 MPH Garvey Avenue N 1 1 Striped No Parking No Parking Commercial No Sign Garvey Avenue S 1 1 Striped No Parking No Parking Commercial No Sign Toluca Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted Commercial No Sign Cameron Avenue 2 2 Striped No Stopping Anytime No Stopping Anytime Commercial 40 MPH Plaza Drive 1 1 Striped No Parking No Parking Commercial No Sign # Lanes Parking Restrictions Existing Lane ConfigurationFigure 4N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456LEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Lane GeometrySignalized IntersectionSNote:* A de facto right-turn lane was assumed due to a wide curb lane.** Right turn traffic volumes was ignored due to a channelized lane.S*S*S*SSS**123456 Existing 2010 Conditions Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 11 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 B. Existing Transit Services The Project study area is served by bus transit lines operated by the City of West Covina and Foothill Transit. Transit service on West Covina Parkway operates adjacent to the west side of the site. Transit service on Sunset Avenue is a walkable distance between 400 to 750 feet (within 0.15 miles) from the Project site. Table 3 summarizes the existing bus lines within the study area. Table 3 – Existing Transit Services Agency Line From To Via Peak Frequnecy West Covina Blue Route West Covina Parkway & Sunet Avenue & Cameron Avenue 55 Minutes West Covina Red Route West Covina Parkway & Sunet Avenue & Workman Avenue 55 Minutes Foothill Transit 185 Puente Hills Mall Azusa West Covina Parkway & Sunet Avenue 30 Minutes Foothill Transit 178 Puente Hills Mall El Monte Pacific Avenue - West Covina Parkway 30 Minutes Foothill Transit 281 Industry Glendora West Covina Parkway & Sunet Avenue 30 Minutes Foothill Transit 498 Azusa Los Angeles I-10 Freeway & West Covina Parkway & Sunset Avenue 7 to 10 Minutes Foothill Transit 499 San Dimas Los Angeles I-10 Freeway 15 Minutes Foothill Transit 699 Montclair Los Angeles I-10 Freeway 12 to 15 Minutes Foothill Transit Silver Streak Montclair Los Angeles I-10 Freeway 20 Minutes Circular Loop Within City Limit Circular Loop Within City Limit Figure 5 illustrates the routes of these transit lines within the study area. Existing Transit ServicesFigure 5N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10LEGENDProject LocationWest Covina Transit - Blue RouteWest Covina Transit - Red RouteFoothill Transit - 178Foothill Transit - 185Foothill Transit - 281Foothill Transit - 498Foothill Transit - 499 / 699 /Silver Streak Existing 2010 Conditions Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 13 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 C. Existing Intersection Levels of Service Based on the peak period traffic counts at the study area intersections, an Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) value that equates to a volume-to-capacity ratio and corresponding level of service value were determined for each of the study area intersections. Table 4 provides the level of service results at each study intersection under existing (year-2011) conditions. As shown in Table 4, all of the study intersections are currently operating at LOS C or better during the analyzed peak hours, except for the Pacific Avenue and I-10 westbound on/off ramps-Garvey Avenue North intersection, which is currently operating at LOS E during both a.m. peak and p.m. peak hours. Bold text within the table indicates the study intersections that are currently operating at LOS E or F. Table 4 – Intersection Level of Service – Existing (2011) Conditions ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Pacific Ave. & Cameron Ave.0.752 C 0.636 B 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N 0.933 E 0.935 E 3 Pacific Ave.–West Covina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. S 0.746 C 0.691 B 4 West Covina Parkway & Toluca Ave.0.332 A 0.439 A 5 Sunset Ave. & West Covina Parkway 0.706 C 0.700 B 6 Sunset Ave. & Plaza Dr.0.533 A 0.547 A PM Peak AM Peak Study Intersections The results of the traffic counts were utilized to determine existing weekday a.m. and p.m. peak-hour conditions. Traffic count summaries are provided in Appendix B of this report. The existing peak-hour intersection volumes are illustrated on Figure 6 (a.m. peak hour) and Figure 7 (p.m. peak). Level of service worksheets for the existing conditions are provided in Appendix C of this report. Existing (2011) AM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 6N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456519152510211834410067857183128170636106614253323246910748611222411753031016114058322539915114683937171712456174222323413417619720021760104157619217446015652675331629190269152136 Existing (2011) PM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 7N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.1012345619255632561084521639258237172145233137117415116299197269123012150336757091984203116475435103781854104635459137309109518864420210938282147821196130409976237507282913314691517611045 Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 16 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 3. Future (2016) Pre-Project Conditions This section provides an analysis of future pre-Project traffic conditions in the study area with ambient growth and area project trips, but without traffic from the Project land uses. The year 2016 was selected for analysis based on the anticipated full occupation date of the proposed Project. The applied ambient growth factor and trips generated by area/related projects are discussed further below. A. Ambient Growth The future period forecast included an ambient growth rate to account for both regional population and employment growth outside of the study area. An annual growth rate of 1% was used for this purpose. Thus, a growth factor of 1.0510 was applied to existing traffic counts to define the future 2016 pre- Project conditions. The future (2016) ambient growth peak-hour turn movement volumes analyzed in this scenario are provided in Figure 8 (a.m. peak) and Figure 9 (p.m. peak). B. Area Projects Area projects were researched within the City limits due to the Project location and adjacent land uses. KOA contacted planning staff at the City of West Covina to define a list of planned/pending area projects. These projects were considered to potentially contribute measurable traffic volumes to the study area during the future analysis period. Figure 10 illustrates the locations of the included area projects. Trip generation calculations were based on the project land use intensities and trip generation rates defined by Trip Generation (8th Edition) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 5 summarizes the trip generation of the included area projects. This traffic was added to the study intersections using a distribution pattern based on the hierarchy of the local street system. Table 5 – Trip Generation of Included Area Projects Total In Out Total In Out 1 Westfield Expansion 112 Plaza Drive Shopping Center Gold's Gym 32.000 k.s.f. 1,054 44 20 24 113 64 49 2 McIntyre Square 2612-1698 E. Garvey Avenue Retail * 9.600 k.s.f. 425 13 8 5 26 11 15 3 Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott 3211 E. Garvey Avenue Hotel 109 Rooms 891 61 37 24 64 34 30 4 West Covina Senior Villas II 1838 E. Workman Avenue Senior Housing - Detached 65 d.u. 241 14 5 9 18 11 7 5 Medical Office SW corner of Pacific Ave & I-10 WB on/off Ramps - Garvey Ave Medical Office 9.300 k.s.f. 336 21 17 4 32 9 23 6 Mixed Used Project 301 S. Glendora Avenue Net total of retail and condominiums 3,380 229 47 182 272 176 96 Total 6,327 382 134 248 525 305 220 * AM peak hour trip generation rates obtained from SANDAG Traffic Generators, May 2003. PM PeakAM PeakIntensity Units Daily TotalLand UseMap #Project Name Location Table 5 indicates that the area projects are expected to generate approximately 6,327 daily weekday trips, of which 382 trips (134 inbound and 248 outbound) would occur during the a.m. peak hour and 525 trips (305 inbound and 220 outbound) would occur during the p.m. peak hour. The assignment for area project trips is illustrated in Figure 11 (a.m. peak) and Figure 12 (p.m. peak). Future (2016) Ambient Growth - AM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 8N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456520155210712436210570901192135179666111645263524257311299012223412355732616914761323641916124714139075413059183223424614118520721022799109165620217848316682815633661200283160143 Future (2016) Ambient Growth - PM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 9N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.101234561975843459114472267227124918115223483901831591701042076396242131583386599920882131224994571088219441096674821443251155198677212115401861548632061374301026247887686914015396218641147 Location of Area ProjectsFigure 10N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456LEGENDProject LocationXArea Projects Location10Badillo St.Puente Ave.Rowland Ave.Workman Ave.Cameron Ave.Vine Ave.Merced Ave.Cortez St.Morris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Sunset Ave.Vincent Ave.Lark Ellen Ave.Azusa Ave.Hollenbeck St.Citrus St.Barranca StGrand Ave. Pacific Ave.West Covina ParkwayValinda Ave.1234WalnutCreek56 Area Projects Trips Assignment - AM Peak HourFigure 11N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456108000411400002551101013020034212093930404481132542291105003060022021300000 Area Projects Trips Assignment - PM Peak HourFigure 12N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.1012345610200002316000021017120011503003412430179530130427021512546956009001406006503440000 Future Pre-Project Conditions Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 22 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 C. Peak-Hour Intersection Level of Service To analyze future conditions without the proposed Project, intersection turn volumes with ambient growth and trips generated by area projects were processed with the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Table 6 summarizes the a.m. and p.m. peak hour results of this analysis. Bold text within the table indicates the study intersections that would operate at LOS E or F under this scenario. Table 6 – Intersection Level of Service Future 2016 pre-Project Conditions ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Pacific Ave. & Cameron Ave.0.792 C 0.670 B 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N 0.985 E 0.992 E 3 Pacific Ave.–West Covina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. S 0.788 C 0.735 C 4 West Covina Parkway & Toluca Ave.0.352 A 0.466 A 5 Sunset Ave. & West Covina Parkway 0.744 C 0.744 C 6 Sunset Ave. & Plaza Dr.0.557 A 0.574 A Study Intersections AM Peak PM Peak As shown in Table 6, the study intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better during the analyzed peak hours, except at the Pacific Avenue and I-10 westbound on/off ramps-Garvey Avenue North intersection. Under this scenario, the study intersection operations at Pacific Avenue and I-10 westbound on/off ramps-Garvey Avenue North would worsen within LOS E during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The peak-hour study intersection turn movement volumes for this scenario are provided on Figure 13 (a.m. peak) and Figure 14 (p.m. peak). Future pre-Project level of service worksheets are provided in Appendix D of this report. Future (2016) Growth with Area Projects - AM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 13N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456178491166828160346752002831601432239251142186207211228121091676202324042117144804439975713063183412756532717015063520555410913337310570906192135182666111645283724277411329012223 Future (2016) Growth with Area Projects - PM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 14N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.1012345619760434591144925688271249181152235840718416117010421778962451315833906111323882301315044601089519441116744821463401275202683221120407861548722061374441026247888291914315796618641147 Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 25 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 4. Project Trip Generation This section summarizes the proposed Project land uses and the traffic generated by those uses. The technical assumptions including trip distribution patterns and traffic assignment to the study area are also discussed. A. Project Trip Generation The proposed Project site is located to the north of the City Library, with an address of 1607 West Covina Parkway, on the southeast corner of West Covina Parkway and Garvey Avenue South. One of the Project access driveways would be located on West Covina Parkway, and a new driveway would be constructed along Garvey Avenue South. The new four-story building would provide a total of approximately 55,361 square feet of medical-office space within a new private parcel adjacent to the West Covina Civic Center, and would not replace any existing uses. Site access and parking would be provided via a reciprocal parking agreement with the City of West Covina. An additional driveway would be constructed along Garvey Avenue South. The modification and expansion of the adjacent parking area would provide up to 201 spaces, including reconfigured lot to the north of the Library. Trip generation calculations for the proposed Project land use included rates established within Trip Generation, 8th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The Project trip generation calculation is summarized in Table 7. Table 7 – Project Trip Generation In Out Total In Out Total Trip Generation Rates Medical-Dental Office Building 720 1.000 k.s.f. 36.13 79% 21% 2.30 27% 73% 3.46 Medical-Dental Office Building 720 55.361 k.s.f.2,000 100 27 127 52 140 192 Source: ITE, 8th Edition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Proposed Project Trips Land Use ITE Code Intensity Average Weekday Table 7 indicates that the Project would generate a total of 2,000 daily vehicle trips, with 127 trips (100 inbound and 27 outbound) occurring during the a.m. peak hour, and 192 trips (52 inbound and 140 outbound) occurring during the p.m. peak hour. The post-Project analysis is summarized within Section 5 of this report. The existing plus Project impact analysis is summarized within Section 6, and the Project impact analysis is summarized within Section 7. B. Project Trip Distribution Trip distribution is the process of assigning the directions from which traffic will access a project site. Trip distribution is dependent upon the land use characteristics of the project, the local roadway network, and the general locations of other land uses to which project trips would originate or terminate. Based on assumptions defined within the scoping document provided to the City, a trip distribution pattern was applied to Project trips. Figure 15 illustrates the trip distribution percentages that were utilized for Project traffic. Project Trip Generation Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 26 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 C. Project Trip Assignment Based on the trip generation and distribution assumptions described above, Project traffic was assigned to the roadway system based on the site driveway location and the roadways that would likely be used to access the regional highway system. The peak-hour Project trip assignment is illustrated on Figure 16 (a.m. peak) and Figure 17 (p.m. peak). Project Trip DistributionFigure 15N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456LEGENDProject LocationXArea Projects LocationDistribution PercentageXX%7%30%4%43%6%10% Project Trip Assignment - AM Peak HourFigure 16N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.1012345610100000400002121150004000273480046162000222240185000510000700010236000000010000 Project Trip Assignment - PM Peak HourFigure 17N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456106000002000026067200020001431939001933810001111409250005500040001210146020000010000 Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 30 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 5. Parking Demand This section summarized the parking area adjacent to the proposed Project, and its existing parking utilization. The technical assumption of the parking generation is also discussed within this section. A. Parking Demand Parking demand would be calculated based on rates within ITE Parking Generation and compared with City Code requirements. Based on the medical-dental office building parking rate, an average peak hour ratio of 2.84 per 1,000 square-feet of gross floor area was utilized per the Parking Generation handbook. As per City Parking Code requirement, the following methodology for medical-office land use was utilized to anticipate the parking supply: Medical Office: Less than 20,000 square foot – 1 space per 150 square foot More than 20,000 square foot – 1 space per 200 square foot Table 8 illustrates the comparison between the ITE Parking Generation and City Code requirements. Table 8 – Parking Generation Parking Generation Rates Medical-Dental Office Building 720 1.000 k.s.f.3.20 0.200 k.s.f.1 Proposed Project Parking Medical-Dental Office Building 720 55.361 k.s.f.177 55.361 k.s.f. 277 177 277 Source: ITE, Parking Generation, 4th Edition and West Covina Municipal Code, Sec. 26-581-2. ITE Basis City Code Basis Floor Area Basis Parking Demand Basis Parking Demand Basis City Code Total:ITE Total: Land Use ITE Code Floor Area Basis Table 8 indicates the average peak hour parking demand would be 177 spaces based on the Parking Generation calculation, and 277 spaces based on the City Code requirements. The Project proposed to provide up to 201 parking spaces (194 standard parking spaces; seven handicap parking spaces). This would provide more parking spaces than what would be expected using rates from ITE Parking Generation (exceeding the expected demand by 24 spaces). Under City Code requirements, however, the Project would provide an inadequate parking supply and there would be a deficit of 76 spaces. B. Parking Demand The East County Regional Library is located adjacent to the proposed Project site. The existing parking lot is currently occupied by the Library and Court House. North of the Library, a total of 100 parking spaces are currently reserved for Library usage only. South of the Library, a total of 42 parking spaces are available for Library staff and public (Court House) parking. A summary of the existing parking conditions is provided in Table 9. Parking Demand Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 31 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 Parking demand was conducted on Tuesday, March 8th of 2011 from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Table 9 illustrates the existing parking demand utilized by the East County Regional Library (West Covina Library) and Court House. Table 9 – Existing Hourly Parking Utilization North Lot % South Lot % Total % Demand Occupied Demand Occupied North & South Occupied SUPPLY 7:00 AM 3 3.0% 27 64.3% 30 21.1% 7:30 AM 3 3.0% 32 76.2% 35 24.6% 8:00 AM 5 5.0% 35 83.3% 40 28.2% 8:30 AM 12 12.0% 36 85.7%48 33.8% 9:00 AM 23 23.0% 36 85.7%59 41.5% 9:30 AM 38 38.0% 35 83.3%73 51.4% 10:00 AM 56 56.0% 36 85.7%92 64.8% 10:30 AM 77 77.0% 36 85.7%113 79.6% 11:00 AM 95 95.0%36 85.7%131 92.3% 11:30 AM 90 90.0% 35 83.3% 125 88.0% 12:00 PM 86 86.0% 35 83.3% 121 85.2% 12:30 PM 89 89.0% 36 85.7%125 88.0% 1:00 PM 83 83.0% 35 83.3% 118 83.1% 1:30 PM 80 80.0% 34 81.0% 114 80.3% 2:00 PM 80 80.0% 34 81.0% 114 80.3% 2:30 PM 81 81.0% 33 78.6% 114 80.3% 3:00 PM 85 85.0% 34 81.0% 119 83.8% 3:30 PM 89 89.0% 35 83.3% 124 87.3% 4:00 PM 86 86.0% 33 78.6% 119 83.8% 4:30 PM 82 82.0% 26 61.9% 108 76.1% 5:00 PM 83 83.0% 19 45.2% 102 71.8% 5:30 PM 84 84.0% 16 38.1% 100 70.4% 100 Spaces 42 Spaces 142 Spaces Table 9 indicates that throughout the day, the north lot parking demand peaks at 95 spaces (95 percent) occupied during the 11:00 a.m. hour. The south lot parking demand peaks at 36 spaces (85.7 percent) occupied during the 8:30 a.m. hour. An average peak of 131 vehicles (92.3 percent) occupied both parking areas during the total peak at11:00 a.m. The number of available parking spaces for the proposed Project assumes that the existing Civic Center parking demand in the North Lot would shift to other areas of the Civic Center. Parking Demand Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 32 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 C. Parking Recommendations As per the City Code requirement defined within Table 8, 277 spaces would be required to be constructed for the proposed Project, although based on ITE Parking Generation demand could be below the proposed parking supply. The Project would provide up to 201 spaces to be dedicated to the proposed use. Currently, Civic Center demand (likely from the nearby Courthouse, primarily) occupies approximately 95 percent of the northern parking area on a typical weekday peak hour. Recommendation for resolving the parking demand overflow from the northern lot to other areas of the Civic Center were examined at a planning-level of analysis. The feasibility of the parking recommendations would need to be determined by the City. The south lot has 42 spaces, which is primarily utilized by Library staff and Court House visitors. Prohibition of parking for the Courthouse and other Civic Center uses outside of the library should be considered by the City at this lot. A lift-arm gate barrier could be installed at this lot, restricted use to library patrons and staff only through the use of staff access cards and free visitor parking exit vouchers. It is recommended that the Project parking lot access be controlled through the use of employee parking permits and visitor time limits, or through the use of controlled-access parking with access cards and vouchers. Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 33 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 6. Existing (2011) plus Project Conditions This section documents existing traffic conditions at the study intersections with the addition of Project- generated traffic. This analysis was undertaken to comply with rulings in the Sunnyvale case, regarding the interpretation of existing condition analysis in CEQA documents. The court’s ruling indicated that impacts for a proposed project should be compared to existing conditions for the determination of impacts, and not project-year or buildout-year conditions. Table 10 summarizes the results of the level of service analysis for this scenario. Intersections that would operate at unacceptable levels of service, LOS E or F, are indicated by bold text within this table. Table 10 – Intersection Level of Service Existing (2011) plus Project Conditions ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Pacific Ave. & Cameron Ave.0.753 C 0.637 B 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N 0.945 E 0.974 E 3 Pacific Ave.–West Covina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. S 0.761 C 0.718 C 4 West Covina Parkway & Toluca Ave.0.333 A 0.447 A 5 Sunset Ave. & West Covina Parkway 0.714 C 0.711 C 6 Sunset Ave. & Plaza Dr.0.533 A 0.548 A AM Peak PM Peak Study Intersections As shown in Table 10, five of the study intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better during the analyzed peak hours. Project traffic would worsen operations at the intersection of Pacific Avenue and the I-10 westbound on/off ramps and Garvey Avenue North, which would continue to operate at LOS E during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resulting traffic volumes are illustrated on Figure 18 (a.m. peak hour) and Figure 19 (p.m. peak hour). The level of service worksheets are provided in Appendix E of this report. Existing (2011) + Project - AM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 18N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456174461156526753316331902691521362235235135181197200217641041576219322940715118745539171712478196411754831516114058520152510211835110067857184128172666106614253323246910758611222 Existing (2011) + Project - PM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 19N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.101234561925623256108452164125823717214523913771811531629919728912301216433866099191032361244854351038919641046444841373091095193644202109386821478211971324191116237527282913314691617611045 Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 36 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 7. Future 2016 Post-Project Conditions This section documents future traffic conditions at the study intersections with the addition of Project- generated traffic in the Project planned opening year of 2016. Traffic volumes for this post-Project scenario were derived by adding the Project-only trips to the volumes defined for the future pre-Project scenario. Table 11 summarizes the results of the level of service analysis for this scenario. Intersections that would operate at unacceptable levels of service, LOS E or F, are indicated by bold text within this table. Table 11 – Intersection Level of Service Future (2016) Post-Project Conditions ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Pacific Ave. & Cameron Ave.0.793 C 0.672 B 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N 0.996 E 1.032 F 3 Pacific Ave.–West Covina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. S 0.801 D 0.762 C 4 West Covina Parkway & Toluca Ave.0.352 A 0.474 A 5 Sunset Ave. & West Covina Parkway 0.753 C 0.761 C 6 Sunset Ave. & Plaza Dr.0.557 A 0.575 A Study Intersections AM Peak PM Peak As shown in Table 11, five of the study intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better during the analyzed peak hours. Operations would continue to worsen within LOS E due to Project traffic during both peak hours at the intersection of Pacific Avenue with the I-10 westbound on/off ramps and Garvey Avenue North. The resulting traffic volumes are illustrated on Figure 20 (a.m. peak hour) and Figure 21 (p.m. peak hour). The level of service worksheets are provided in Appendix F of this report. Future (2016) with Area Projects and Project - AM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 20N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.10123456178492166828160346792002831601432250253143190207211228161091676229324442917148866041875713085205412758433217015063521555410913338010570906193135184696111645283724277411339012223 Future (2016) with Area Projects and Project - PM Peak Hour Intersection VolumesFigure 21N1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIALEGENDProject LocationXStudy IntersectionsIntersection Turn VolumeXXMorris Ave.Orange Ave.Orange Ave.Cameron Ave.Pacific Ave.Pacific Ln.Workman Ave. West Covina Pkwy.Garvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. NGarvey Ave. SWalnuthaven Dr.Garvey Ave. SPlaza Dr.WEST COVINASHOPPING CENTERTuloc Ave.Sunset Ave.Evanwood Ave.101234561976103459114492569027124918115224184131911631701042178096245131723409650132310726314051446010810620541116845081463401275208683221120411861548722071394541166247908291914315796718641147 Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 39 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 8. Project Significant Traffic Impact Analysis A. Methodology for Study Intersection Impacts Traffic impacts occur if a proposed development will result in significant changes in traffic conditions at a study location. A significant impact is typically identified if project-related traffic will cause LOS to deteriorate beyond a threshold limit specified by the reviewing agency. Impacts can also be significant if an intersection is already operating below the acceptable level of service and project traffic will cause a further decline in operations beyond the threshold. The City of West Covina has established specific thresholds for project-related increases in the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) value, similar to a volume-to-capacity ratio (v/c), at signalized intersections. These thresholds are provided below: STUDY INTERSECTION IMPACTS Level of Service Volume/Capacity Ratio Project-Related Increase in ICU Value D to F 0.800 or greater Equal to or greater than 0.02 B. Determination of Significant Impacts Existing plus Project As discussed within Section 6 of this report, the Sunnyvale case sets a precedent where existing conditions should be compared with the proposed project. Table 12 and Table 13 provide the comparison of the a.m. and p.m. peak-hour existing (2011) + project study scenario analysis. Traffic impacts created by the project were calculated by subtracting the ICU values in the “Existing (2011) Conditions” column from the values in the “Existing (2011) + Project” column. The determinations of significant impacts for the study intersections are provided within the two columns at the right side of each table. Table 12 – Determination of Existing + Project Impacts – AM Peak Hour ICULOSICULOS 1 Pacific Ave. & Cameron Ave. 0.752 C 0.753 C 0.001 No 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N 0.933 E 0.945 E 0.012 No 3 Pacific Ave.–West Covina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. S 0.746 C 0.761 C 0.015 No 4 West Covina Parkway & Toluca Ave. 0.332 A 0.333 A 0.001 No 5 Sunset Ave. & West Covina Parkway 0.706 C 0.714 C 0.008 No 6 Sunset Ave. & Plaza Dr. 0.533 A 0.533 A 0.000 No Sig Impact? Change in ICU Existing (2011) + ProjectStudy Intersections Existing (2011) Conditions Project Traffic Impacts Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 40 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 Table 13 – Determination of Existing + Project Impacts – AM Peak Hour ICULOSICULOS 1 Pacific Ave. & Cameron Ave. 0.636 B 0.637 B 0.001 No 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N 0.935 E 0.974 E 0.039 YES 3 Pacific Ave.–West Covina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. S 0.691 B 0.718 C 0.027 No 4 West Covina Parkway & Toluca Ave. 0.439 A 0.447 A 0.008 No 5 Sunset Ave. & West Covina Parkway 0.700 B 0.711 C 0.011 No 6 Sunset Ave. & Plaza Dr. 0.547 A 0.548 A 0.001 No Sig Impact?Study Intersections Existing (2011) Conditions Existing (2011) + Project Change in ICU As indicated within Table 12 and Table 13, the proposed Project would not cause significant traffic impacts to occur at the any of the study intersection during a.m. peak-hour, however, during the p.m. peak hour, one intersection would be significantly impacted – Pacific Avenue/I-10 westbound on/off- ramps/Garvey Avenue. The mitigation measure for this impact would match that identified for the future project analysis. Future with Project In addition to the existing (2011) plus project traffic impact analysis, the traditional future with project analysis was also considered for project impact determinations. Table 14 and Table 15 provide a comparison of the a.m. and p.m. peak-hour future pre-Project and post-Project study scenarios. Traffic impacts created by the project were calculated by subtracting the ICU values in the “Future 2016 No Project” column from the values in the “Future 2016 With Project” column. The determinations of significant impacts for the study intersections are provided within the two columns at the right side of the table. Table 14 – Determination of Future with-Project Impacts – AM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Pacific Ave. & Cameron Ave.0.752 C 0.792 C 0.793 C 0.001 No 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N 0.933 E 0.985 E 0.996 E 0.011 No 3 Pacific Ave.–West Covina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. S 0.746 C 0.788 C 0.801 D 0.013 No 4 West Covina Parkway & Toluca Ave.0.332 A 0.352 A 0.352 A 0.000 No 5 Sunset Ave. & West Covina Parkway 0.706 C 0.744 C 0.753 C 0.009 No 6 Sunset Ave. & Plaza Dr.0.533 A 0.557 A 0.557 A 0.000 No Sig Impact? Change in ICU Existing (2011) Conditions Future 2016 With Project Study Intersections Future 2016 No Project Project Traffic Impacts Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 41 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 Table 15 – Determination of Future with-Project Impacts – PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Pacific Ave. & Cameron Ave.0.636 B 0.670 B 0.672 B 0.002 No 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N 0.935 E 0.992 E 1.032 F 0.040 YES 3 Pacific Ave.–West Covina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. S 0.691 B 0.735 C 0.762 C 0.027 No 4 West Covina Parkway & Toluca Ave.0.439 A 0.466 A 0.474 A 0.008 No 5 Sunset Ave. & West Covina Parkway 0.700 B 0.744 C 0.761 C 0.017 No 6 Sunset Ave. & Plaza Dr.0.547 A 0.574 A 0.575 A 0.001 No Sig Impact?Study Intersections Future 2016 No Project Future 2016 With Project Change in ICU Existing (2011) Conditions As indicated within Table 14 and Table 15, similar to existing plus Project conditions, the proposed Project would not cause significant traffic impacts at the any of the study intersection during a.m. peak hour, however, there would be one significant impact at Pacific Avenue/I-10 westbound on/off- ramps/Garvey Avenue during the p.m. peak hour. Mitigation measures would be necessary to restore operations proportionate to the removal of the incremental impacts of the Project. Mitigation Measures To mitigate the significant impact at the Pacific Avenue/I-10 westbound on/off-ramps/Garvey Avenue intersection during the p.m. peak hour, a northbound second left-turn lane is recommended. This would add a second left-turn lane to the northbound approach. The addition of this turn lane would not require widening of the roadway. However, it would be required that existing raised medians at the northbound and eastbound approaches be reconfigured in order to install the second left-turn lane. Tables 16 summarizes the mitigation measure analysis for Pacific Avenue/I-10 westbound on/off- ramps/Garvey Avenue during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 16 – Mitigation Measure Analysis – AM and PM Peak Hours With the recommended mitigation measure, the intersection operations would improve for both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours from LOS E and F to LOS E, and the significant impact would be removed. ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N AM 0.933 E 0.985 E 0.996 E 0.011 No 0.926 E -0.059 No PM 0.935 E 0.992 E 1.032 F 0.040 YES 0.915 E -0.077 No Existing (2011) Conditions Future 2016 With Project Study Intersections Future 2016 No Project Peak Period Change in ICU Sig Impact? Sig Impact? Change in ICU Future 2016 With Project With Mitigation Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 42 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 9. CMP and Caltrans Facility Impacts This section demonstrates conformance of this traffic study to impact analysis procedures mandated by the County of Los Angeles congestion Management Program (CMP) and State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), regarding impacts of new developments on regional travel routes. A. Congestion Management Program The CMP was created statewide because of Proposition 111 and was implemented locally by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). The CMP for Los Angeles County requires that the traffic impact of individual development projects of potentially regional significance be analyzed. A specific system of arterial roadways plus all freeways comprises the CMP system. Per CMP Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, a traffic impact analysis is conducted where: • At CMP arterial monitoring intersections, including freeway on-ramps or off-ramps, where the proposed project will add 50 or more vehicle trips during either morning or afternoon weekday peak hours. • At CMP mainline freeway-monitoring locations, where the project will add 150 or more trips, in either direction, during the either the morning or afternoon weekday peak hours. Impacts to CMP Arterial The nearest CMP arterial monitoring intersections to the project site are on Azusa Avenue at Cameron Avenue and Azusa Avenue at Workman Avenue. Based on the Project trip generation and the distance of this CMP location from the study intersections, it is not expected that 50 or more new trips per hour would be added to this location. Therefore, no further analysis of potential CMP impacts is required. Impacts to CMP Freeway The nearest CMP mainline freeway-monitoring location to the project site is on the Interstate 10 freeway, east of Puente Avenue. The proposed project is expected to add less than 150 new trips per hour to any freeway segments near the project site, since the project would generate less than 150 total trips. Therefore, no further analysis of CMP freeway monitoring stations is required. B. Highway Capacity Analysis for Freeway Ramp Intersections A supplemental analysis was undertaken in order to provide a level of service analysis that meets Caltrans guidelines for the freeway ramp study intersections. The data used for the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology analysis used for the primary level of service analysis in this report was applied to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology accepted by Caltrans Operations at the freeway ramp study intersections, using the HCM Operations methodology, are summarized within Table 20. CMP and Caltrans Facility Impacts Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 43 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 Table 17 – Freeway Ramp Intersection HCM Analysis – AM and PM Peak Hours Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 2 Pacific Ave. & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. N AM 31.6 C 32.2 C 34.7 C 35.5 D PM 31.8 C 34.1 C 35.2 D 38.9 D 3 Pacific Ave.–West Covina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Ave. S AM 21.9 C 23.2 C 23.2 C 24.5 C PM 25.2 C 25.9 C 26.0 C 26.7 C Future (2016) With Project Study Intersections Future (2016) No Project Existing (2011) ConditionsTime Period Existing (2011) + Project As shown by the LOS values within Table 17, the study intersections at the freeway ramps are currently operating at LOS C (good conditions), and would continue to operate at LOS C under the existing plus project and future with project a.m. peak hour scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour future with project scenario, the LOS degrades to LOS D. This is still considered acceptable operating conditions. C. Potential Freeway Impacts Caltrans publishes guidelines on the calculations of potential impacts to State facilities from planned development projects. The Interstate 10 freeway is maintained by Caltrans and is a CMP freeway route within the Project study area. Analysis is presented here based on Caltrans traffic impact guidelines. Existing volumes were compiled from Caltrans data, via Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) data reports from 2009. Data for the year 2009 is the most recent available data summarized by Caltrans. Table 20 provides a summary of the collected data. The “West Covina, Orange/Pacific Avenue Interchange” location is the closest data collection point to the primary freeway access point for the Project. The volumes for this analysis are indicated by bold text under the “Back Peak Hour” and “Ahead Peak Hour” headings within Table 18. The “back” and “ahead” labels refer to the direction on the freeway facility from the analyzed location. Per Caltrans definitions for data collection and analysis on the I-10 facility, back volumes are further west on the facility and ahead volumes are further east on the facility (in relation to the overall facility direction of travel within the region). Table 18 – Recent Caltrans Volume Data for I-10 in Vicinity of Project District Route County Postmile Description Peak Hour Peak Month Back AADT Peak Hour Peak Month Ahead AADT 7 10 LA 34.457 WEST COVINA, ORANGE/ PACIFIC AVES 14,000 220,000 215,000 14,500 226,000 222,000 7 10 LA 35.402 WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA/VINCENT AVES 14,500 226,000 222,000 15,100 233,000 229,000 Growth factors used within the primary traffic impact analysis were utilized here to increase the existing I-210 volumes from the year 2009 to the area SCAG traffic model buildout year of 2035. The total applied growth factor was 29.5 percent based on the compounded addition of one percent of ambient growth per year over the 26-year period between the year 2009 and the year 2035. Therefore, the buildout year volumes calculated for the I-10 facility were compared to the trips that would be generated by the Project, to provide an understanding of the percent share of Project traffic versus the mainline freeway flow. The calculations are provided below. CMP and Caltrans Facility Impacts Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 44 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 Analysis per Caltrans Impact Guidelines The Caltrans document entitled Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies defines a formula for the computation of equitable share responsibility for freeway facility mitigation measures, where projects have been identified. This formula is as follows: Vehicle trips generated by the project during the peak hour ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Traffic volume on facility at build-out) – (Existing volumes – area projects volumes) Existing traffic volumes, and known area projects volumes, are removed from these volumes to isolate background growth that is not attributable to any specific project. These calculations are provided below, for the I-10 segments next to the Orange/Pacific Avenue interchange. The highest Project share of traffic was also chosen between the “back” and “ahead” locations. For the Project, more traffic would generally be distributed to the west of this interchange than to the east. The maximum Project share of volumes, per Caltrans guidelines, on the analyzed mainline I-10 freeway segments would be approximately 0.13 percent, for the highest instances of the Project’s share of mainline volumes near both interchanges, based on the peak location and peak period. These percentages represent the Project’s fair-share of any freeway improvement projects that could be identified by Caltrans. Orange/Pacific Avenue, Back Direction (west of interchange) AM Peak Hour Project-generated volume of 55 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Build-out freeway volume of 278,480) - (existing volume of 215,000) - (area projects volume of 118) = 55 / (278,480-215,000-118) = 0.09% Orange/Pacific Avenue, Back Direction (west of interchange) PM Peak Hour Project-generated volume of 82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Build-out freeway volume of 278,480) - (existing volume of 215,000) - area projects volume of 166) = 82 / (27,480-215,000-166) = 0.13% Based on the low Project-share percentages of traffic on the I-10, any impacts of the Project on the facility will be low, based on the applied standards. The Project applicant will need to coordinate with Caltrans; however, to understand the agency’s determination on mitigation need for the State facility. CMP and Caltrans Facility Impacts Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 45 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 Freeway Ramp Analysis A ramp capacity analysis was conducted at the Orange/Pacific Avenue/I-10 freeway interchange, where a majority of the Project trip assignment would occur to and from the I-10 freeway. The analysis was conducted to determine if the freeway on-ramps would have adequate capacity for vehicle queues in the future and buildout pre-Project and post-Project periods. Two types of analysis were performed – a ramp junction capacity analysis and a ramp queuing analysis. The ramp junction analysis determined if the total volume at each on-ramp was below the capacity of the single-lane ramp junction point where the single-occupant vehicle (SOV) and high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes come together. The capacity used for the junction analysis was 2,000 vehicles per hour. The storage capacity of the metered lane, in feet, was included in the analysis. The design queue length was based on a two-minute uniform SOV arrival rate and assumed a vehicle spacing of 20 feet, based on fieldwork conducted at the ramp intersection. The maximum metered lane capacity was assumed to be 900 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl), consistent with a two-second timing of the meter green phase and a two-second yellow/red indication. A 20% HOV proportion was assumed, leaving a conservative 80% of the volumes within the SOV lane. Future Project-Year Impacts A storage length issue was identified within the analysis at the eastbound on-ramp to the I-10 freeway from Pacific Avenue-West Covina Parkway during the PM peak period. This issue was apparent in the future pre-Project, existing plus Project, and future post-Project scenarios, but would not be caused solely by the proposed Project. This would occur in both the Project-year and the buildout-year scenarios. Storage length issues were not identified at the westbound on-ramps at this interchange. The design queue length issue was identified within the ramp queue analysis at the westbound on-ramp to the I-10 freeway from Pacific Avenue-West Covina Parkway during both a.m. and p.m. peal periods. This issue was apparent in the future pre-Project, existing plus Project, and future post-Project scenarios, but would not be caused solely by the proposed Project. This would occur in both the Project-year and the buildout-year scenarios. The project would increase the estimated queue length by 2 percent during the a.m. peak hour and 11 percent during the p.m. peak hour. The ramp capacity and queuing analysis spreadsheets for pre-Project, existing plus Project, future Project-year, and buildout with Project scenarios are provided in Appendix G to this report. Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 46 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 10. Analysis Summary The following summarizes the traffic study results and conclusions: • Based on the scoping document submitted to the City and discussed and verified with staff, the Project study area included six intersections. Significant traffic impacts of the proposed Project were analyzed within the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. • Under existing 2011 conditions, five of the six study intersections are operating at LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. One of the intersections is operating at LOS E during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours. • The traffic analysis included ambient growth through the Project year, and four related projects within the City of West Covina. • Under future 2016 pre-Project conditions, five of the six study intersections would operate at LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. One of the intersections would operate at LOS E during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours. • The full occupation of Project uses is anticipated to be 2016. • The proposed Project land use would consist of 55,361 square-feet of medical office space. The modification and expansion of the adjacent parking area would provide up to 201 dedicated spaces. • The Project would generate 2,000 daily trips, of which 127 trips (100 inbound and 27 outbound) during the a.m. peak hour, and 192 trips (52 inbound and 140 outbound) during the p.m. peak hour. • With the addition of Project traffic, one of the study intersections would continue to operate at LOS E during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The other study intersections would operate at LOS C or better during both a.m. and p.m. peak periods. • Based on the applied City of West Covina significant impact criteria, the proposed Project would create one significant impact at Pacific Avenue/I-10 westbound on/off-ramps/Garvey Avenue during both existing plus Project and future plus Project scenarios. Mitigation measures would be required. • To mitigate the significant traffic impact at the study intersection of Pacific Avenue/I-10 westbound on/off-ramps-Garvey Avenue a new/second northound left-turn lane is recommended. • The Project proposed to provide up to 201 parking spaces (194 standard parking spaces; seven handicap parking spaces). • Project parking supply would provide more parking spaces than what would be expected using rates from ITE Parking Generation (exceeding the expected demand by 24 spaces). Under City Code requirements, however, the Project would provide an inadequate parking supply and there would be a deficit of 76 spaces. Analysis Summary Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Page 47 Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 • The south lot has 42 spaces, which is primarily utilized by Library staff and Court House visitors. Prohibition of parking for the Courthouse and other Civic Center uses outside of the library should be considered by the City at this lot. A lift-arm gate barrier could be installed at this lot, restricted use to library patrons and staff only through the use of staff access cards and free visitor parking exit vouchers. • It is recommended that the Project parking lot access be controlled through the use of employee parking permits and visitor time limits or through the use of controlled-access parking with access cards and vouchers. Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Appendices Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 APPENDIX A Study Scoping Document SCOPING FOR TRAFFIC STUDY 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIA March 30, 2011 [v2] Scoping for Traffic Study - 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Page 1 KOA Corporation – JB01235 This scoping document acknowledges City of West Covina requirements of traffic impact analysis for the following project. Project Name: 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Project Location: The proposed Project site would be located at the southeast corner of the West Covina Parkway/Garvey Avenue-Interstate 10 eastbound on/off ramps intersection. The proposed project would consist of a new four-story professional office building located at the northwest corner of the West Covina Civic Center. Project Description: The new four-story building would provide a total of approximately 55,361 square feet of office space within a new private parcel adjacent to the West Covina Civic Center, and would not replace any existing uses. Site access and parking would be provided via a reciprocal parking agreement with the City of West Covina. On the “south lot”, the County Library will have gate arms installed and a parking validation system and signs posted for library parking only. On the “north lot”, it will be open and parking will be shared. An additional driveway would be constructed along Garvey Avenue. The modification and expansion of the adjacent parking area would provide up to 197 spaces. Trip Distribution: The main access to the Project site would be the new proposed driveway on Garvey Avenue. A majority of the project trips would be distributed to the I-10 freeway, and some to local arterial roads. The project site location and overall trip distribution are illustrated in Attachment A. Trip Generation: The following table illustrates the rates from Trip Generation (8th edition), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The daily and peak-hour trip generation totals for the project are provided in the bottom row of the table. In Out Total In Out Total Trip Generation Rates General Office Building 710 1.000 k.s.f. 11.01 88% 12% 1.55 17% 83% 1.49 General Office Building 710 55.361 k.s.f.610 76 10 86 14 68 82 Source: ITE, 8th Edition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Proposed Project Trips Land Use ITE Code Intensity Average Weekday Parking Generation: Parking demand would be calculated based on City Code requirements and compared with rates within ITE Parking Generation. This will determine if the Project would provide sufficient parking spaces. The following table illustrates the average parking demand based on rates within Parking Generation. City of West Covina Parking Code: Medical Use: Less than 20,000 square feet – 1 space per 150 square feet More than 20,000 square feet – 1 space per 200 square feet General Office: Less than 20,000 square feet – 1 space per 300 square feet More than 20,000 square feet – 1 space per 350 square feet SCOPING FOR TRAFFIC STUDY 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIA March 30, 2011 [v2] Scoping for Traffic Study - 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Page 2 KOA Corporation – JB01235 Parking Generation Rates General Office Building 710 1.000 k.s.f. 2.84 0.350 k.s.f. 1 Proposed Project Parking General Office Building 710 55.361 k.s.f. 157 55.361 k.s.f. 158 157 158 Source: ITE, Parking Generation, 4th Edition and West Covina Municipal Code, Sec. 26-581-2. ITE Basis City Code Basis Floor Area Basis Parking Demand Basis Parking Demand Basis City Code Total:ITE Total: Land Use ITE Code Floor Area Basis Project Analysis Year: 2012 Ambient Growth Rate: 1% Area Projects: The following table includes a list of pending projects and the associated trip generation will be included in the analysis: Total In Out Total In Out 1 Westfield Expansion 112 Plaza Drive Shopping Center Gold's Gym 32.000 k.s.f. 1,054 44 20 24 113 64 49 2 McIntyre Square 2612-1698 E. Garvey Avenue Retail * 9.600 k.s.f. 425 13 8 5 26 11 15 3 Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott 3211 E. Garvey Avenue Hotel 109 Rooms 891 61 37 24 64 34 30 4 West Covina Senior Villas II 1838 E. Workman Avenue Senior Housing - Detached 65 d.u. 241 14 5 9 18 11 7 Total 2,611 132 70 62 221 120 101 * AM peak hour trip generation rates obtained from SANDAG Traffic Generators, May 2003. PM PeakAM PeakIntensity Units Daily TotalLand UseMap #Project Name Location Study Intersections: Peak hour manual traffic counts would be conducted on a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Peak hour traffic counts would be conducted at the following intersections (locations illustrated within Attachment A): 1. Pacific Avenue & Cameron Avenue 2. Pacific Avenue & I-10 WB on/off ramps–Garvey Avenue N 3. Pacific Avenue–West Covina Parkway & I-10 EB on/off ramps–Garvey Avenue S 4. West Covina Parkway & Toluca Avenue 5. Sunset Avenue & West Covina Parkway 6. Sunset Avenue & Plaza Drive Parking Survey: The project analysis will also include a parking study, for the determination of the existing parking demand in the adjacent (northern) parking area that would be used by the Project. The project would modify and expand the northern parking area (north of the Library) to provide up to 197 parking spaces. The parking analysis would determine the necessary parking supply for shared use by the project and adjacent Civic Center uses. The parking study area would include the existing parking lots located to the north and south of the City Library. A parking demand survey would be conducted on a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at a 30-minute frequency. A Project site plan with the proposed modified/expanded parking areas is provided in Attachment B. Access Analysis: A new driveway would be proposed on Garvey Avenue. Due to the driveway location and potential hazards associated with the adjacent roadway curvature, sight distance issues would be reviewed for that location. SCOPING FOR TRAFFIC STUDY 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIA March 30, 2011 [v2] Scoping for Traffic Study - 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Page 3 KOA Corporation – JB01235 Congestion Management Program (CMP) Guidelines: Based on the 2010 Congestion Management Program, a significant impact occurs when the proposed project increases traffic demand on a CMP facility by 2% or more of capacity (v/c > 0.02) causing or worsening LOS F (v/c > 1.000) conditions. The nearest CMP location includes two arterial and one freeway monitoring stations within the study area: • Azusa Avenue & Cameron Avenue (CMP arterial) • Azusa Avenue & Workman Avenue (CMP arterial) • Interstate – 10, east of Puente Avenue (CMP freeway) City Impact Guidelines: As defined in the City of West Covina Traffic Analysis Guidelines, traffic impact analysis need to be based on the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to calculate Level of Service (LOS) values for signalized intersections. The threshold for project traffic impacts is an increase in the V/C ratio of 0.020 or grater at an LOS value of E or F. This analysis will follow applicable guidelines and policies of City of West Covina and County of Los Angeles Congestion Management Program (CMP) for the traffic impact analysis. Consultant: Applicant: Name: KOA Corporation Parkway Investment, LLC: Address: 1100 Corporate Center Dr., Suite 200 17528 Rowland Street, #218 Monterey Park, CA 91754-7642 City of Industry, CA 91748 Contact: Brian A. Marchetti – (323) 260-4703 Mr. Johnny Hang – (626) 913-8939 SCOPING FOR TRAFFIC STUDY 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIA March 30, 2011 [v2] Scoping for Traffic Study - 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Attachments KOA Corporation – JB01235 ATTACHMENT A PROJECT SITE AND STUDY LOCATIONS SCOPING FOR TRAFFIC STUDY 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) - TIA March 30, 2011 [v2] Scoping for Traffic Study - 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Attachments KOA Corporation – JB01235 ATTACHMENT B PROJECT SITE PLAN Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Appendices Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 APPENDIX B Traffic Count Data Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 7:00 AM 19 100 3 4 148 41 58 11 24 11 31 6 456 7:15 AM 15 87 3 12 167 42 54 28 36 17 63 12 536 7:30 AM 19 152 5 9 172 45 63 34 50 20 92 14 675 7:45 AM 20 119 4 6 150 56 89 62 28 19 61 18 632 8:00 AM 20 102 3 4 140 47 63 28 22 9 51 9 498 8:15 AM 27 83 4 4 124 42 43 23 27 10 41 10 438 8:30 AM 29 83 6 5 119 45 36 18 13 15 29 6 404 8:45 AM 19 81 3 5 109 44 38 20 21 9 34 12 395 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :168 807 31 49 1129 362 444 224 221 110 402 87 4034 APPROACH %'s :16.70%80.22%3.08%3.18%73.31%23.51%49.94%25.20%24.86%18.36%67.11%14.52% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :74 460 15 31 629 190 269 152 136 65 267 53 2341 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.867 CONTROL : 0.780 0.940 0.778 Signalized 0.764 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Pacific Ave Pacific Ave EASTBOUND AM Cameron AveCameron AveNS/EW Streets: Project ID: City: CA11_5071_001 City of West Covina Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 4:00 PM 19 123 6 7 146 64 38 32 31 17 26 10 519 4:15 PM 29 123 13 5 161 40 45 36 33 10 23 10 528 4:30 PM 20 130 7 4 147 55 34 37 44 11 23 7 519 4:45 PM 23 126 10 6 163 60 51 34 37 10 22 5 547 5:00 PM 18 141 9 4 159 54 50 43 56 10 17 12 573 5:15 PM 26 137 10 7 155 68 67 48 32 15 27 12 604 5:30 PM 29 124 9 5 164 72 58 39 28 13 32 11 584 5:45 PM 19 154 4 5 161 64 62 42 29 18 32 10 600 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :183 1058 68 43 1256 477 405 311 290 104 202 77 4474 APPROACH %'s :13.98%80.83%5.19%2.42%70.72%26.86%40.26%30.91%28.83%27.15%52.74%20.10% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :500 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :92 556 32 21 639 258 237 172 145 56 108 45 2361 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.977 CONTROL : Project ID:CA11_5071_001 City:City of West Covina Signalized Cameron AveNS/EW Streets:Cameron Ave PM Pacific Ave Pacific Ave 0.871 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.952 0.9300.960 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 0 1 2 1 .5 .5 1 0 1 0 7:00 AM 65 34 34 3 142 31 23 2 22 31 67 45 499 7:15 AM 62 59 29 4 194 31 38 1 50 46 54 54 622 7:30 AM 53 69 26 4 228 26 41 1 59 57 51 59 674 7:45 AM 58 56 38 4 175 21 38 2 45 37 47 45 566 8:00 AM 50 50 41 9 163 26 40 2 38 36 45 42 542 8:15 AM 51 40 33 2 136 32 47 1 35 32 33 30 472 8:30 AM 48 34 33 4 123 21 46 0 42 32 18 19 420 8:45 AM 49 41 32 7 127 15 45 5 31 26 32 20 430 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :436 383 266 37 1288 203 318 14 322 297 347 314 4225 APPROACH %'s :40.18%35.30%24.52%2.42%84.29%13.29%48.62%2.14%49.24%31.00%36.22%32.78% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 2404 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.892 CONTROL : 0.972 0.858 0.879 Signalized 0.858 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Pacific Ave Pacific Ave EASTBOUND AM I-10 WB on/off ramps-Garvey Ave I-10 WB on/off ramps-Garvey AveNS/EW Streets: Project ID: City: CA11_5071_002 City of West Covina Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 0 1 2 1 .5 .5 1 0 1 0 4:00 PM 66 65 41 11 164 18 60 6 29 35 32 33 560 4:15 PM 79 92 33 9 170 28 62 6 44 28 21 24 596 4:30 PM 88 73 38 7 161 23 53 3 30 45 38 20 579 4:45 PM 72 91 44 2 185 18 66 4 41 32 32 16 603 5:00 PM 93 115 38 6 179 28 49 2 35 44 54 23 666 5:15 PM 86 84 51 5 178 22 47 3 34 45 40 27 622 5:30 PM 80 81 41 6 184 23 68 3 40 30 36 33 625 5:45 PM 57 77 41 8 181 22 60 1 32 40 31 24 574 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :621 678 327 54 1402 182 465 28 285 299 284 200 4825 APPROACH %'s :38.19%41.70%20.11%3.30%85.59%11.11%59.77%3.60%36.63%38.19%36.27%25.54% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 2516 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.944 CONTROL : Project ID:CA11_5071_002 City:City of West Covina Signalized I-10 WB on/off ramps-Garvey AveNS/EW Streets:I-10 WB on/off ramps-Garvey Ave PM Pacific Ave Pacific Ave 0.851 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.981 0.8830.890 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 .5 .5 1 7:00 AM 29 88 1 1 48 154 36 10 12 1 5 16 401 7:15 AM 61 99 2 10 82 191 28 6 25 0 1 16 521 7:30 AM 62 106 2 7 119 224 29 12 50 3 0 18 632 7:45 AM 58 99 5 8 89 155 36 16 50 1 1 13 531 8:00 AM 44 95 6 14 81 147 31 22 49 7 2 21 519 8:15 AM 48 67 2 13 86 99 28 28 45 4 3 22 445 8:30 AM 35 65 2 6 88 105 29 21 46 1 3 26 427 8:45 AM 39 68 5 14 59 109 25 17 43 4 2 24 409 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :376 687 25 73 652 1184 242 132 320 21 17 156 3885 APPROACH %'s :34.56%63.14%2.30%3.82%34.15%62.02%34.87%19.02%46.11%10.82%8.76%80.41% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 2203 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.871 CONTROL : 0.940 0.805 0.868 Signalized 0.692 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND West Covina Parkway West Covina Parkway EASTBOUND AM I-10 EB on/off ramps-Garvey Ave I-10 EB on/off ramps-Garvey AveNS/EW Streets: Project ID: City: CA11_5071_003 City of West Covina Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 .5 .5 1 4:00 PM 96 96 5 22 89 110 21 21 44 12 24 48 588 4:15 PM 63 118 4 30 97 108 22 19 41 6 14 56 578 4:30 PM 82 124 2 28 101 114 25 17 52 7 25 58 635 4:45 PM 84 136 4 37 121 107 27 10 42 2 18 49 637 5:00 PM 113 168 1 25 114 111 14 26 37 3 31 60 703 5:15 PM 75 147 2 30 122 112 30 19 41 8 16 51 653 5:30 PM 95 119 2 24 118 105 32 23 65 6 19 43 651 5:45 PM 77 105 0 27 104 124 30 17 58 7 35 44 628 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :685 1013 20 223 866 891 201 152 380 51 182 409 5073 APPROACH %'s :39.87%58.96%1.16%11.26%43.74%45.00%27.42%20.74%51.84%7.94%28.35%63.71% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 2644 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.940 CONTROL : Project ID:CA11_5071_003 City:City of West Covina Signalized I-10 EB on/off ramps-Garvey AveNS/EW Streets:I-10 EB on/off ramps-Garvey Ave PM West Covina Parkway West Covina Parkway 0.814 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.968 0.7630.839 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 0 0 2 0 1.5 0 .5 0 0 0 7:00 AM 24 105 37 22 33 7 228 7:15 AM 36 144 55 33 24 8 300 7:30 AM 34 139 85 44 37 20 359 7:45 AM 24 131 85 50 50 17 357 8:00 AM 23 116 85 34 29 13 300 8:15 AM 23 99 71 49 25 2 269 8:30 AM 17 88 84 36 21 11 257 8:45 AM 24 105 70 16 32 16 263 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :205 927 0 0 572 284 251 0 94 0 0 0 2333 APPROACH %'s :18.11%81.89%0.00%0.00%66.82%33.18%72.75%0.00%27.25%#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 1316 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.916 CONTROL : 0.899 0.872 0.739 Signalized 0.000 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND West Covina Parkway West Covina Parkway EASTBOUND AM Toluca AveToluca AveNS/EW Streets: Project ID: City: CA11_5071_004 City of West Covina Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 0 0 2 0 1.5 0 .5 0 0 0 4:00 PM 30 120 103 26 82 21 382 4:15 PM 30 150 104 33 44 20 381 4:30 PM 12 139 116 29 74 20 390 4:45 PM 27 161 106 35 67 24 420 5:00 PM 33 166 113 31 115 38 496 5:15 PM 25 168 101 41 69 26 430 5:30 PM 19 140 139 30 58 21 407 5:45 PM 28 157 130 27 46 20 408 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :204 1201 0 0 912 252 555 0 190 0 0 0 3314 APPROACH %'s :14.52%85.48%0.00%0.00%78.35%21.65%74.50%0.00%25.50%#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 1753 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.884 CONTROL : Project ID:CA11_5071_004 City:City of West Covina Signalized Toluca AveNS/EW Streets:Toluca Ave PM West Covina Parkway West Covina Parkway 0.000 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.882 0.6830.928 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 7:00 AM 37 76 21 11 137 34 15 26 10 24 57 13 461 7:15 AM 58 111 22 23 196 42 17 44 15 28 97 15 668 7:30 AM 49 151 17 19 287 53 34 43 19 32 78 25 807 7:45 AM 39 120 35 10 189 37 42 45 12 29 99 44 701 8:00 AM 45 143 28 15 185 51 35 38 17 29 70 16 672 8:15 AM 42 112 23 23 177 46 29 38 22 23 64 34 633 8:30 AM 35 106 21 22 234 41 30 40 16 19 50 28 642 8:45 AM 41 94 25 14 145 42 29 56 19 20 61 26 572 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :346 913 192 137 1550 346 231 330 130 204 576 201 5156 APPROACH %'s :23.85%62.92%13.23%6.74%76.24%17.02%33.43%47.76%18.81%20.80%58.72%20.49% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 2848 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.882 CONTROL : 0.942 0.771 0.912 Signalized 0.817 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Sunset Ave Sunset Ave EASTBOUND AM Pacific Ave-West Covina Parkway Pacific Ave-West Covina ParkwayNS/EW Streets: Project ID: City: CA11_5071_005 City of West Covina Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 4:00 PM 45 169 46 24 163 46 36 66 29 20 75 20 739 4:15 PM 42 125 61 24 202 48 38 90 20 27 98 28 803 4:30 PM 42 166 39 34 172 49 38 97 23 25 72 26 783 4:45 PM 48 157 66 34 195 54 29 95 28 25 91 20 842 5:00 PM 41 182 48 37 192 49 36 96 23 24 116 19 863 5:15 PM 52 147 49 34 214 54 39 108 24 32 99 21 873 5:30 PM 47 158 39 42 220 39 26 110 22 28 76 22 829 5:45 PM 47 140 47 31 187 45 41 103 22 39 106 22 830 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :364 1244 395 260 1545 384 283 765 191 220 733 178 6562 APPROACH %'s :18.17%62.11%19.72%11.88%70.58%17.54%22.84%61.74%15.42%19.45%64.81%15.74% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 3407 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.976 CONTROL : Project ID:CA11_5071_005 City:City of West Covina Signalized Pacific Ave-West Covina ParkwayNS/EW Streets:Pacific Ave-West Covina Parkway PM Sunset Ave Sunset Ave 0.901 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.964 0.9300.954 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1.5 .5 1 7:00 AM 7 84 11 18 179 19 2 0 1 6 4 9 340 7:15 AM 10 129 10 13 278 14 0 0 4 7 5 4 474 7:30 AM 13 174 4 24 301 16 1 0 6 12 10 9 570 7:45 AM 27 166 9 16 281 30 5 1 5 11 5 6 562 8:00 AM 37 145 2 16 214 26 5 1 7 3 3 5 464 8:15 AM 25 111 10 19 231 23 1 0 3 4 3 6 436 8:30 AM 32 102 6 19 211 16 4 11 7 3 8 8 427 8:45 AM 32 106 11 18 202 27 2 2 7 4 0 4 415 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :183 1017 63 143 1897 171 20 15 40 50 38 51 3688 APPROACH %'s :14.49%80.52%4.99%6.47%85.80%7.73%26.67%20.00%53.33%35.97%27.34%36.69% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :87 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 2070 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.908 CONTROL : 0.899 0.901 0.673 Signalized 0.645 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Sunset Ave Sunset Ave EASTBOUND AM Plaza DrPlaza DrNS/EW Streets: Project ID: City: CA11_5071_006 City of West Covina Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1.5 .5 1 4:00 PM 6 159 19 28 166 7 7 7 6 17 2 14 438 4:15 PM 4 102 6 22 167 5 4 23 4 14 11 14 376 4:30 PM 2 215 21 27 206 7 13 1 14 13 2 28 549 4:45 PM 3 190 14 42 236 4 10 1 12 20 1 24 557 5:00 PM 2 212 25 27 230 2 29 3 17 32 4 55 638 5:15 PM 6 133 12 50 243 4 9 5 2 17 2 26 509 5:30 PM 3 180 24 33 223 5 3 1 2 22 2 30 528 5:45 PM 4 175 20 36 242 5 3 1 2 20 0 50 558 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :30 1366 141 265 1713 39 78 42 59 155 24 241 4153 APPROACH %'s :1.95%88.87%9.17%13.14%84.93%1.93%43.58%23.46%32.96%36.90%5.71%57.38% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :430 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :13 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 2253 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.883 CONTROL : Project ID:CA11_5071_006 City:City of West Covina Signalized Plaza DrNS/EW Streets:Plaza Dr PM Sunset Ave Sunset Ave 0.615 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.907 0.5920.873 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1.5 .5 1 7:00 AM 4 4 7:15 AM 1 1 7:30 AM 5 5 7:45 AM 8 8 8:00 AM 3 3 8:15 AM 3 3 8:30 AM 2 2 8:45 AM 4 4 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 APPROACH %'s :100.00%0.00%0.00%#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :730 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.594 CONTROL : NS/EW Streets: Project ID: City: CA11_5071_006 City of West Covina EASTBOUND AM Plaza DrPlaza Dr 0.000 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Sunset Ave Sunset Ave 0.594 0.000 0.000 Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day:TUESDAY Date:3/8/2011 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1.5 .5 1 4:00 PM 2 2 4:15 PM 1 1 4:30 PM 5 5 4:45 PM 2 2 5:00 PM 1 1 5:15 PM 1 1 5:30 PM 0 5:45 PM 1 1 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 APPROACH %'s :100.00%0.00%0.00%#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :400 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.500 CONTROL : 0.000 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.000 0.0000.500 Signalized Plaza DrNS/EW Streets:Plaza Dr PM Sunset Ave Sunset Ave Project ID:CA11_5071_006 City:City of West Covina Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Appendices Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 APPENDIX C Study Intersection Analysis Worksheets – Existing (2010) Conditions Existing AM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:02 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Pacific Ave & Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.752 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Ave Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 460 15 31 629 190 269 152 136 65 267 53 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 74 460 15 31 629 190 269 152 136 65 267 53 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 74 460 15 31 629 0 269 152 136 65 267 53 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 460 15 31 629 0 269 152 136 65 267 53 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 74 460 15 31 629 0 269 152 136 65 267 53 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 0.69 0.14 Final Sat.: 1600 3099 101 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 270 1110 220 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.20 0.00 0.17 0.10 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing AM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:02 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West Covina Pkwy & I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey N ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.933 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.31 0.34 0.35 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1541 59 1600 491 550 558 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.24 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.36 0.36 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing AM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:03 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 West Coviina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.746 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.69 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2880 3084 116 1600 3200 1600 1102 498 1600 1600 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.02 0.12 0.45 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing AM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:03 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 West Coviina Pkwy & Toluca Ave ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.332 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy Toluca Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.41 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 0 3200 1600 2263 0 937 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing AM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:03 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Sunset Ave & West Covina Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.706 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 51 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave West Covina Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 OvlAdjVol: 0 55 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.46 0.54 1.00 1.55 0.45 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 2335 865 1600 2479 721 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.16 0.06 0.04 0.27 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.14 0.14 OvlAdjV/S: 0.00 0.03 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing AM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:03 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Sunset Ave & Plaza Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.533 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave Plaza Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 106 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 106 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 106 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.82 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1886 1314 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.19 0.02 0.04 0.34 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing PM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:06 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Pacific Ave & Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.636 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 43 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Ave Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 92 556 32 21 639 258 237 172 145 56 108 45 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 92 556 32 21 639 258 237 172 145 56 108 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 92 556 32 21 639 0 237 172 145 56 108 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 556 32 21 639 0 237 172 145 56 108 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 92 556 32 21 639 0 237 172 145 56 108 45 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 0.52 0.21 Final Sat.: 1600 3026 174 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 429 827 344 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.13 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing PM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:06 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West Covina Pkwy & I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey N ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.935 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 121 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 0.37 0.39 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1521 79 1600 586 629 384 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.12 0.11 0.01 0.23 0.06 0.14 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing PM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:06 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 West Coviina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.691 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 49 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.57 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2880 3150 50 1600 3200 1600 910 690 1600 1600 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.15 0.27 0.06 0.11 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.13 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing PM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:06 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 West Coviina Pkwy & Toluca Ave ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.439 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy Toluca Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.48 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 0 3200 1600 2366 0 834 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.09 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing PM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:06 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Sunset Ave & West Covina Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.700 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave West Covina Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 OvlAdjVol: 93 66 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.65 0.35 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 2587 613 1600 2634 566 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.20 0.13 0.09 0.26 0.12 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.14 0.15 OvlAdjV/S: 0.06 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing PM Wed Mar 16, 2011 13:57:06 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Sunset Ave & Plaza Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.547 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave Plaza Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 23 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 23 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 23 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 2884 316 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.23 0.05 0.09 0.29 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Appendices Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 APPENDIX D Study Intersection Analysis Worksheets – Future (2016) pre-Project Conditions Fut Area Proj AM Sun Jul 24, 2011 15:53:18 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Pacific Ave & Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.792 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 65 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Ave Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 460 15 31 629 190 269 152 136 65 267 53 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 78 483 16 33 661 200 283 160 143 68 281 56 Added Vol: 0 8 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 78 491 16 34 675 200 283 160 143 68 281 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 78 491 16 34 675 0 283 160 143 68 281 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 78 491 16 34 675 0 283 160 143 68 281 60 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 78 491 16 34 675 0 283 160 143 68 281 60 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 0.69 0.14 Final Sat.: 1600 3101 99 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 267 1099 234 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.18 0.10 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj AM Sun Jul 24, 2011 15:53:18 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West Covina Pkwy & I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey N ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.985 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 174 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 234 246 141 22 799 109 165 6 202 185 207 210 Added Vol: 5 5 1 0 13 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 239 251 142 22 812 109 167 6 202 186 207 211 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 239 251 142 22 812 109 167 6 202 186 207 211 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 239 251 142 22 812 109 167 6 202 186 207 211 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 239 251 142 22 812 109 167 6 202 186 207 211 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.31 0.34 0.35 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1542 58 1600 492 548 559 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.25 0.07 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.38 0.38 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj AM Sun Jul 24, 2011 15:53:18 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 West Coviina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.788 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 64 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 236 419 16 41 390 754 130 59 183 12 4 71 Added Vol: 4 2 1 3 9 3 0 4 0 2 0 9 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 240 421 17 44 399 757 130 63 183 14 4 80 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 240 421 17 44 399 757 130 63 183 14 4 80 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 240 421 17 44 399 757 130 63 183 14 4 80 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 240 421 17 44 399 757 130 63 183 14 4 80 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2880 3078 122 1600 3200 1600 1079 521 1600 1600 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.12 0.47 0.08 0.12 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj AM Sun Jul 24, 2011 15:53:18 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 West Coviina Pkwy & Toluca Ave ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.352 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy Toluca Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 123 557 0 0 326 169 147 0 61 0 0 0 Added Vol: 4 8 0 0 1 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 127 565 0 0 327 170 150 0 63 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 127 565 0 0 327 170 150 0 63 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 127 565 0 0 327 170 150 0 63 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 127 565 0 0 327 170 150 0 63 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.41 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 0 3200 1600 2255 0 945 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj AM Sun Jul 24, 2011 15:53:18 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Sunset Ave & West Covina Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.744 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 56 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave West Covina Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 201 552 107 70 901 192 135 179 66 124 362 105 Added Vol: 4 2 2 0 5 0 0 3 0 9 11 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 205 554 109 70 906 192 135 182 66 133 373 105 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 205 554 109 70 906 192 135 182 66 133 373 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 205 554 109 70 906 192 135 182 66 133 373 105 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 205 554 109 70 906 192 135 182 66 133 373 105 OvlAdjVol: 0 58 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.47 0.53 1.00 1.56 0.44 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 2345 855 1600 2496 704 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.17 0.07 0.04 0.28 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.15 OvlAdjV/S: 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj AM Sun Jul 24, 2011 15:53:18 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Sunset Ave & Plaza Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.557 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave Plaza Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 111 645 26 73 1129 90 12 2 23 35 24 25 Added Vol: 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 111 645 28 74 1132 90 12 2 23 37 24 27 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 111 645 28 74 1132 90 12 2 23 37 24 27 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 645 28 74 1132 90 12 2 23 37 24 27 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 111 645 28 74 1132 90 12 2 23 37 24 27 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.21 0.79 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1929 1271 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.20 0.02 0.05 0.35 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:49 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Pacific Ave & Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.670 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Ave Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 92 556 32 21 639 258 237 172 145 56 108 45 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 97 584 34 22 672 271 249 181 152 59 114 47 Added Vol: 0 20 0 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 97 604 34 25 688 271 249 181 152 59 114 49 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 97 604 34 25 688 0 249 181 152 59 114 49 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 97 604 34 25 688 0 249 181 152 59 114 49 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 97 604 34 25 688 0 249 181 152 59 114 49 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 0.51 0.22 Final Sat.: 1600 3031 169 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 425 819 356 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.16 0.11 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:49 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West Covina Pkwy & I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey N ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.992 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 348 390 183 20 763 96 242 13 158 159 170 104 Added Vol: 10 17 1 1 15 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 358 407 184 21 778 96 245 13 158 161 170 104 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 358 407 184 21 778 96 245 13 158 161 170 104 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 358 407 184 21 778 96 245 13 158 161 170 104 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 358 407 184 21 778 96 245 13 158 161 170 104 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 0.37 0.39 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1522 78 1600 591 626 383 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.13 0.11 0.01 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.16 0.10 0.10 0.27 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:49 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 West Coviina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.735 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 55 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 386 599 9 122 499 457 108 82 194 20 88 213 Added Vol: 4 12 4 9 5 3 0 13 0 3 0 17 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 390 611 13 131 504 460 108 95 194 23 88 230 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 390 611 13 131 504 460 108 95 194 23 88 230 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 390 611 13 131 504 460 108 95 194 23 88 230 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 390 611 13 131 504 460 108 95 194 23 88 230 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.53 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2880 3131 69 1600 3200 1600 852 748 1600 1600 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.16 0.29 0.07 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.06 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:49 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 West Coviina Pkwy & Toluca Ave ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.466 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy Toluca Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 109 667 0 0 482 144 325 0 115 0 0 0 Added Vol: 2 7 0 0 0 2 15 0 12 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 111 674 0 0 482 146 340 0 127 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 111 674 0 0 482 146 340 0 127 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 674 0 0 482 146 340 0 127 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 111 674 0 0 482 146 340 0 127 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.46 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 0 3200 1600 2332 0 868 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.09 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:49 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Sunset Ave & West Covina Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.744 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 56 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave West Covina Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 198 677 212 154 863 206 137 430 102 115 401 86 Added Vol: 4 6 9 0 9 0 0 14 0 5 6 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 202 683 221 154 872 206 137 444 102 120 407 86 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 202 683 221 154 872 206 137 444 102 120 407 86 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 202 683 221 154 872 206 137 444 102 120 407 86 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 202 683 221 154 872 206 137 444 102 120 407 86 OvlAdjVol: 102 69 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.65 0.35 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 2602 598 1600 2641 559 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.21 0.14 0.10 0.27 0.13 0.09 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.15 0.15 OvlAdjV/S: 0.06 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Area Proj PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:49 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Pre-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Sunset Ave & Plaza Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.574 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave Plaza Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 23 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 24 788 76 153 962 18 64 11 47 86 9 140 Added Vol: 0 0 6 4 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 24 788 82 157 966 18 64 11 47 91 9 143 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 24 788 82 157 966 18 64 11 47 91 9 143 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 24 788 82 157 966 18 64 11 47 91 9 143 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 24 788 82 157 966 18 64 11 47 91 9 143 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 2899 301 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.25 0.05 0.10 0.30 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Appendices Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 APPENDIX E Study Intersection Analysis Worksheets – Existing (2011) plus Project Conditions Existing + Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:36 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Pacific Ave & Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.753 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Ave Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 460 15 31 629 190 269 152 136 65 267 53 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 74 460 15 31 629 190 269 152 136 65 267 53 Added Vol: 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 74 461 15 31 633 190 269 152 136 65 267 53 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 74 461 15 31 633 0 269 152 136 65 267 53 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 461 15 31 633 0 269 152 136 65 267 53 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 74 461 15 31 633 0 269 152 136 65 267 53 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 0.69 0.14 Final Sat.: 1600 3099 101 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 270 1110 220 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.20 0.00 0.17 0.10 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:36 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West Covina Pkwy & I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey N ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.945 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 129 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 Added Vol: 12 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 27 5 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 235 235 135 21 764 104 157 6 219 181 197 200 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 235 235 135 21 764 104 157 6 219 181 197 200 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 235 235 135 21 764 104 157 6 219 181 197 200 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 235 235 135 21 764 104 157 6 219 181 197 200 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.31 0.34 0.35 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1541 59 1600 501 545 554 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.24 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.14 0.11 0.36 0.36 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:36 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 West Coviina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.761 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 Added Vol: 4 8 0 16 20 0 0 22 22 0 4 6 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 229 407 15 55 391 717 124 78 196 11 8 74 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 229 407 15 55 391 717 124 78 196 11 8 74 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 229 407 15 55 391 717 124 78 196 11 8 74 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 229 407 15 55 391 717 124 78 196 11 8 74 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.61 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2880 3086 114 1600 3200 1600 982 618 1600 1600 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.12 0.45 0.08 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:36 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 West Coviina Pkwy & Toluca Ave ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.333 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy Toluca Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 18 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 117 548 0 0 315 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 117 548 0 0 315 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 117 548 0 0 315 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 117 548 0 0 315 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.41 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 0 3200 1600 2263 0 937 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:36 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Sunset Ave & West Covina Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.714 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave West Covina Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 Added Vol: 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 7 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 201 525 102 67 857 184 128 172 66 118 351 100 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 201 525 102 67 857 184 128 172 66 118 351 100 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 201 525 102 67 857 184 128 172 66 118 351 100 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 201 525 102 67 857 184 128 172 66 118 351 100 OvlAdjVol: 0 56 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55 1.00 1.56 0.44 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 2313 887 1600 2490 710 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.16 0.06 0.04 0.27 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.14 0.14 OvlAdjV/S: 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:36 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Sunset Ave & Plaza Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.533 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave Plaza Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 106 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 106 614 25 69 1075 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 106 614 25 69 1075 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 614 25 69 1075 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 106 614 25 69 1075 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.82 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1886 1314 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.19 0.02 0.04 0.34 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:40 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Pacific Ave & Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.637 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 43 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Ave Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 92 556 32 21 639 258 237 172 145 56 108 45 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 92 556 32 21 639 258 237 172 145 56 108 45 Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 92 562 32 21 641 258 237 172 145 56 108 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 92 562 32 21 641 0 237 172 145 56 108 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 562 32 21 641 0 237 172 145 56 108 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 92 562 32 21 641 0 237 172 145 56 108 45 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 0.52 0.21 Final Sat.: 1600 3028 172 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 429 827 344 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.13 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:40 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West Covina Pkwy & I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey N ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.974 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 159 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 Added Vol: 60 6 7 0 2 0 0 0 14 2 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 391 377 181 19 728 91 230 12 164 153 162 99 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 391 377 181 19 728 91 230 12 164 153 162 99 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 391 377 181 19 728 91 230 12 164 153 162 99 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 391 377 181 19 728 91 230 12 164 153 162 99 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 0.37 0.39 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1521 79 1600 591 626 383 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.12 0.11 0.01 0.23 0.06 0.14 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:40 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 West Coviina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.718 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 Added Vol: 19 39 0 8 10 0 0 11 11 0 19 33 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 386 609 9 124 485 435 103 89 196 19 103 236 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 386 609 9 124 485 435 103 89 196 19 103 236 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 386 609 9 124 485 435 103 89 196 19 103 236 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 386 609 9 124 485 435 103 89 196 19 103 236 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.54 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2880 3153 47 1600 3200 1600 858 742 1600 1600 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.15 0.27 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.06 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:40 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 West Coviina Pkwy & Toluca Ave ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.447 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy Toluca Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 9 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 104 644 0 0 484 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 104 644 0 0 484 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 104 644 0 0 484 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 104 644 0 0 484 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.48 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 0 3200 1600 2366 0 834 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.09 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:40 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Sunset Ave & West Covina Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.711 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 51 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave West Covina Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 Added Vol: 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 10 14 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 193 644 202 147 821 197 132 419 111 109 386 82 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 193 644 202 147 821 197 132 419 111 109 386 82 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 193 644 202 147 821 197 132 419 111 109 386 82 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 193 644 202 147 821 197 132 419 111 109 386 82 OvlAdjVol: 93 65 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.58 0.42 1.00 1.65 0.35 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 2530 670 1600 2639 561 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.20 0.13 0.09 0.26 0.12 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.15 0.15 OvlAdjV/S: 0.06 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Existing + Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:41:40 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Sunset Ave & Plaza Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.548 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave Plaza Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 23 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 23 752 72 146 916 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 752 72 146 916 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 23 752 72 146 916 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 23 752 72 146 916 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 2884 316 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.24 0.05 0.09 0.29 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Appendices Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 APPENDIX F Study Intersection Analysis Worksheets – Future (2016) Post-Project Conditions Fut Post Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:52:46 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Pacific Ave & Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.793 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 65 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Ave Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 460 15 31 629 190 269 152 136 65 267 53 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 78 483 16 33 661 200 283 160 143 68 281 56 Added Vol: 0 9 0 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 78 492 16 34 679 200 283 160 143 68 281 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 78 492 16 34 679 0 283 160 143 68 281 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 78 492 16 34 679 0 283 160 143 68 281 60 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 78 492 16 34 679 0 283 160 143 68 281 60 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 0.69 0.14 Final Sat.: 1600 3101 99 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 267 1099 234 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.18 0.10 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:52:46 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West Covina Pkwy & I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey N ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.996 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 223 234 134 21 760 104 157 6 192 176 197 200 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 234 246 141 22 799 109 165 6 202 185 207 210 Added Vol: 16 7 2 0 17 0 2 0 27 5 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 250 253 143 22 816 109 167 6 229 190 207 211 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 250 253 143 22 816 109 167 6 229 190 207 211 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 250 253 143 22 816 109 167 6 229 190 207 211 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 250 253 143 22 816 109 167 6 229 190 207 211 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.31 0.34 0.35 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1542 58 1600 500 545 556 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.25 0.07 0.10 0.11 0.14 0.12 0.38 0.38 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:52:46 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 West Coviina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.801 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 225 399 15 39 371 717 124 56 174 11 4 68 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 236 419 16 41 390 754 130 59 183 12 4 71 Added Vol: 8 10 1 19 28 3 0 26 22 2 4 15 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 244 429 17 60 418 757 130 85 205 14 8 86 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 244 429 17 60 418 757 130 85 205 14 8 86 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 244 429 17 60 418 757 130 85 205 14 8 86 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 244 429 17 60 418 757 130 85 205 14 8 86 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.61 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2880 3080 120 1600 3200 1600 969 631 1600 1600 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.13 0.47 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.01 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:52:46 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 West Coviina Pkwy & Toluca Ave ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.352 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy Toluca Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 117 530 0 0 310 161 140 0 58 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 123 557 0 0 326 169 147 0 61 0 0 0 Added Vol: 4 27 0 0 6 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 127 584 0 0 332 170 150 0 63 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 127 584 0 0 332 170 150 0 63 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 127 584 0 0 332 170 150 0 63 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 127 584 0 0 332 170 150 0 63 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.41 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 0 3200 1600 2255 0 945 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:52:46 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Sunset Ave & West Covina Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.753 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave West Covina Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 191 525 102 67 857 183 128 170 63 118 344 100 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 201 552 107 70 901 192 135 179 66 124 362 105 Added Vol: 14 2 2 0 5 1 0 5 3 9 18 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 215 554 109 70 906 193 135 184 69 133 380 105 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 215 554 109 70 906 193 135 184 69 133 380 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 215 554 109 70 906 193 135 184 69 133 380 105 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 215 554 109 70 906 193 135 184 69 133 380 105 OvlAdjVol: 0 59 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55 1.00 1.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 2324 876 1600 2506 694 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.17 0.07 0.04 0.28 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.15 OvlAdjV/S: 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project AM Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:52:46 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Sunset Ave & Plaza Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.557 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave Plaza Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 614 25 69 1074 86 11 2 22 33 23 24 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 111 645 26 73 1129 90 12 2 23 35 24 25 Added Vol: 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 111 645 28 74 1133 90 12 2 23 37 24 27 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 111 645 28 74 1133 90 12 2 23 37 24 27 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 645 28 74 1133 90 12 2 23 37 24 27 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 111 645 28 74 1133 90 12 2 23 37 24 27 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.21 0.79 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1929 1271 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.20 0.02 0.05 0.35 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:56 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Pacific Ave & Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.670 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Ave Cameron Ave / Pacific Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 92 556 32 21 639 258 237 172 145 56 108 45 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 97 584 34 22 672 271 249 181 152 59 114 47 Added Vol: 0 26 0 3 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 97 610 34 25 690 271 249 181 152 59 114 49 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 97 610 34 25 690 0 249 181 152 59 114 49 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 97 610 34 25 690 0 249 181 152 59 114 49 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 97 610 34 25 690 0 249 181 152 59 114 49 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 0.51 0.22 Final Sat.: 1600 3033 167 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 425 819 356 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.22 0.00 0.16 0.11 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:56 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West Covina Pkwy & I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey N ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.031 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 WB on/off Ramps / Garvey Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 331 371 174 19 726 91 230 12 150 151 162 99 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 348 390 183 20 763 96 242 13 158 159 170 104 Added Vol: 70 23 8 1 17 0 3 0 14 4 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 418 413 191 21 780 96 245 13 172 163 170 104 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 418 413 191 21 780 96 245 13 172 163 170 104 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 418 413 191 21 780 96 245 13 172 163 170 104 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 418 413 191 21 780 96 245 13 172 163 170 104 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 0.37 0.39 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1522 78 1600 596 623 381 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.16 0.11 0.10 0.27 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:56 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 West Coviina Pkwy & I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.762 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy I-10 EB on/off Ramps / Garvey S Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 367 570 9 116 475 435 103 78 185 19 84 203 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 386 599 9 122 499 457 108 82 194 20 88 213 Added Vol: 23 51 4 18 15 3 0 24 11 3 19 50 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 409 650 13 140 514 460 108 106 205 23 107 263 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 409 650 13 140 514 460 108 106 205 23 107 263 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 409 650 13 140 514 460 108 106 205 23 107 263 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 409 650 13 140 514 460 108 106 205 23 107 263 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.51 0.49 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2880 3135 65 1600 3200 1600 808 792 1600 1600 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.16 0.29 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.07 0.16 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:56 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 West Coviina Pkwy & Toluca Ave ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.474 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: West Coviina Pkwy Toluca Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 104 635 0 0 459 137 309 0 109 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 109 667 0 0 482 144 325 0 115 0 0 0 Added Vol: 2 17 0 0 26 2 15 0 12 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 111 684 0 0 508 146 340 0 127 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 111 684 0 0 508 146 340 0 127 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 684 0 0 508 146 340 0 127 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 111 684 0 0 508 146 340 0 127 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.46 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 0 3200 1600 2332 0 868 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.09 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:56 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Sunset Ave & West Covina Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.744 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 56 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave West Covina Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 188 644 202 147 821 196 130 409 97 109 382 82 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 198 677 212 154 863 206 137 430 102 115 401 86 Added Vol: 10 6 9 0 9 1 2 24 14 5 10 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 208 683 221 154 872 207 139 454 116 120 411 86 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 208 683 221 154 872 207 139 454 116 120 411 86 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 208 683 221 154 872 207 139 454 116 120 411 86 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 208 683 221 154 872 207 139 454 116 120 411 86 OvlAdjVol: 102 68 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.65 0.35 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 2549 651 1600 2646 554 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.21 0.14 0.10 0.27 0.13 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.16 0.16 OvlAdjV/S: 0.06 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Fut Post Project PM Thu Jul 28, 2011 09:40:56 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1607 West Covina Parkway (Parkway Corporate Center) Future Post-Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Sunset Ave & Plaza Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.575 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Sunset Ave Plaza Dr Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 23 750 72 146 915 17 61 10 45 82 9 133 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 24 788 76 153 962 18 64 11 47 86 9 140 Added Vol: 0 2 6 4 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 24 790 82 157 967 18 64 11 47 91 9 143 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 24 790 82 157 967 18 64 11 47 91 9 143 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 24 790 82 157 967 18 64 11 47 91 9 143 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 24 790 82 157 967 18 64 11 47 91 9 143 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 2899 301 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.25 0.05 0.10 0.30 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KOA CORP, MONTEREY PK Prepared for Parkway Investment, LLC Appendices Traffic Impact Study – 1607 West Covina Parkway Project (Parkway Corporate Center) JB01235 August 3, 2011 APPENDIX G Ramp Capacity and Queuing Analysis JB01235 1607 West Covina Parkway SOV %80% I-10 West Covina Parkway Ramp Junction Analysis Merge Ln Capacity 2,000 MASTER WORKSHEET FOR LANES AND CAPACITIES Mixed- Flow Ramp Volume SOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?HOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?Mixed- Flow Ramp Volume SOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?HOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?West Covina Parkway Westbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 187 493 394 Yes 99 Yes 555 444 Yes 111 Yes Eastbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 787 890 712 Yes 178 Yes 834 667 Yes 167 Yes Mixed- Flow Ramp Volume SOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?HOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?Mixed- Flow Ramp Volume SOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?HOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?West Covina Parkway Westbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 187 476 381 Yes 95 Yes 572 458 Yes 114 Yes Eastbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 787 848 678 Yes 170 Yes 821 657 Yes 164 Yes Mixed- Flow Ramp Volume SOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?HOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?Mixed- Flow Ramp Volume SOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?HOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?West Covina Parkway Westbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 187 503 402 Yes 101 Yes 608 486 Yes 122 Yes Eastbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 787 897 718 Yes 179 Yes 868 694 Yes 174 Yes Mixed- Flow Ramp Volume SOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?HOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?Mixed- Flow Ramp Volume SOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?HOV- Flow Ramp Volume Sufficient Ramp Meter Capacity?West Covina Parkway Westbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 187 609 487 Yes 122 Yes 729 583 Yes 146 Yes Eastbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 787 1,080 864 Yes 216 Yes 1,049 839 No 210 Yes Note: Assumes 80% SOV Metered Lane Capacity (VPH)Storage Length (ft)AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Metered LanesHOV LanesLanes at Freeway JunctionYear 2035 Buildout Metered Lane Capacity (VPH)Storage Length (ft)AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Metered LanesHOV LanesLanes at Freeway JunctionYear 2012 Post-Project Existing (2011) Plus Project Metered LanesYear 2012 Pre-Project Metered LanesHOV LanesLanes at Freeway JunctionMetered Lane Capacity (VPH)Storage Length (ft)AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour HOV LanesLanes at Freeway JunctionMetered Lane Capacity (VPH)Storage Length (ft)AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour JB01235 1607 West Covina Parkway I-10 West Covina Parkway Ramp Queue Analysis Year 2012 Pre-Project Metered Ramp Volume Design Queue Length (ft)Storage Area Acceptable?Metered Ramp Volume Design Queue Length (ft)Storage Area Acceptable?West Covina Parkway Westbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 187 394 270 No 444 300 No Eastbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 787 712 480 Yes 667 450 Yes Existing (2011) Plus Project Metered Ramp Volume Design Queue Length (ft)Storage Area Acceptable?Metered Ramp Volume Design Queue Length (ft)Storage Area Acceptable?West Covina Parkway Westbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 187 381 260 No 458 310 No Eastbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 787 678 460 Yes 657 440 Yes Year 2012 Post-Project Metered Ramp Volume Design Queue Length (ft)Storage Area Acceptable?Metered Ramp Volume Design Queue Length (ft)Storage Area Acceptable?West Covina Parkway Westbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 187 402 270 No 486 330 No Eastbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 787 718 480 Yes 694 470 Yes Year 2035 Buildout Metered Ramp Volume Design Queue Length (ft)Storage Area Acceptable?Metered Ramp Volume Design Queue Length (ft)Storage Area Acceptable?West Covina Parkway Westbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 187 487 330 No 583 390 No Eastbound On-Ramp 1 1 1 900 787 864 580 Yes 839 560 Yes Note: Assumes 80% SOV Design Queue Length Equal to Traffic Arrivals for 2 minutes Metered Lane Capacity (VPH)Storage Length (ft)AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Metered LanesHOV LanesLanes at Freeway JunctionPM Peak Hour Metered LanesHOV LanesLanes at Freeway JunctionMetered Lane Capacity (VPH)Storage Length (ft)AM Peak HourMetered Lane Capacity (VPH)Storage Length (ft)AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Metered LanesHOV LanesLanes at Freeway JunctionMetered LanesHOV LanesLanes at Freeway JunctionMetered Lane Capacity (VPH)Storage Length (ft)AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour