Loading...
02-09-1981 - Regular Meeting - Minutes• �f • M I N U T E S REGULAR -MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF WEST COVINA- CALIFORNIA February 9, 1981 The City Council of the City of West Covina convened in the City Manager's Conference Room at 6:00 PM for the purpose of conducting an Executive Ses- sion to discuss litigation matters. At 7:30 PM Mayor Shearer called the meeting to order in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1444 W. Garvey Avenue, West Covina, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Bacon and the invocation was given by Councilman Tennant. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Shearer, Mayor Pro Tem Tice, Councilmembers Chappell, Tennant, Bacon Others Present: Mooney, Fast, Lennard, Pryor, Miller, Eliot, Thomas, R. Holmes, Wolff, Keating, Salazar, Fowler, Meacham, McClelland, Berry APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Chappell, seconded by Bacon, and unanimously carried to approve the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of February 2, 1981, as amended. CONSENT CALENDAR Planning Commission Summary of Action of February 4, 1981 (accept and file) Recreation and Parks Commission Summary of Action of January 27, 1981 (accept.and file) Human Resources Commission Summary of Action of January 22, 1981 (accept and file) ABC Applications (Chief of Police reports no legal basis for protest) Larry Gregory dba GRAND CREEK LIQUOR 1556 E. Ruddock 100 North Grand Avenue Building A Covina, CA West Covina, CA Louis Brutocao dba (old) COFFEE DANS & WOODEN HORSE 645 S. Aldenville, 1002 W. Garvey Avenue Covina, CA West Covina, CA .Iluminada M. Bautista dba WAYNE'S KITCHETERIA 3309 S. Garden Terrace Lane 376 Fashion Plaza Hacienda Heights, CA West Covina, CA Forain Michel dba CENTER MARKET 4258 Brunswick Avenue'.. 126 S. Glendora Avenue Los Angeles, CA West Covina, CA Robert M: Kunz dba SEA GALLEY STORES, INC. 200 James Street #200 102.9,S. Glendora Avenue Edmonds, Washington West Covina, CA Claims for Action Lester D. Zabel Filed a .claim on January 16, 1981 for property damage amounting to, $138.00 (deny and notify claimant) -1- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 9, 1981 Page Two Acceptances of Improvements and/or Release of Bonds • Precise Plan 741 Location: Southeast corner of Cameron and Orange Avenues West Covina Office Staff recommends accepting public works improvements Center and grading as completed and authorizing the release of Faithful Performance Bonds in the amount of $40,000, $14;400, and $13,200. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION Motion by Bacon, seconded by Tennant to approve all items listed on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried by roll call vote: AYES: Bacon, Tennant, Chappell, Tice, Shearer NOES: None ' Mayor Shearer stated that Item F-2(a) would be brought forward on the Agenda and discussed'at this time as there were so many in the audience interested is the matter. REPORT FROM EUTEK; INC. REGARDING ODOR CONDITIONS AT THE BKK SANITARY LANDFILL Council reviewed staff's report. Motion by Tice, seconded by Tennant, and unanimously carried to receive and file the•"BKK Landfill Odor Study, Second Interim Report." • VERBAfIft ►RAN$CRIPTION'_ Shearer:.. At this time we will have Council discussion with regard to the con- text of the report and any action that the Council wishes to take. on the basis of that. I think because of the significance of the item we are going to be discussing I would like the City Clerk to prepare a verbatim transcript of this matter as part of the Minutes. —Tice: As far as the context of the interim report, I have no comment at this time until I see the final report. There is some indications of some progress. However, I would like to expound a little bit here on the options available to this Council, if you have no objections. The way I see it, there are probably five options available to the Council regarding the operation of the BKK landfill. The first option is to determine that the odor mitigation measures taken so far by the BKK Corporation have shown to be sufficient in the way of improvement and odor conditions and, thus, no :further' action would be taken by the Council at this time. The second option is to extend the ninety -day deadline for com- pliance with the Unclassified Use Permit based on implementing the additional mitigation measures recommended in the Interim Eutek Study Report. . Number three is to continue any further action on this matter until a judicial decision can be obtained regarding the City's authority to fully control the operation of the landfill, including a determination to revoke the UUP in closing the landfill. The fourth option is direct the City Attorney to file a complaint . in the courts and obtain a stay to close the landfill temporarily. The fifth option is to determine that the BKK Corporation is in violation of the Unclassified Use Permit with regards to the odor problem and direct the City Manager to issue a notice of violation to the BKK Corporation. Then, direct the Planning Commission to start the proceedings to conduct public hearings on the revocation, sus- pension or amendment of the UUP and at the same time, concurrently,. .determine the need for an environmental impact report. From my own observation, I believe that the BKK Corporation has made a dedicated effort to mitigate the odor problem based on the present state of the art and implementing the recommendations of the - 2 - I. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 9, 1981 Page Three USC and Eutek studies. However, I feel -that the -operation of the land- fill -still has aways to go to significantly mitigate the odor problem. And as such, I am recommending the following motion: Authorize the City Manager to issue a notice of vio- lation of the OUP relating to odors. Two, direct and authorize the Planning Commission to conduct public hearings as soon as possible on the revoca- tion, suspension, or amendment of the UUP, and at the same time determine the necessity of preparing an environmental impact report. These actions, preparing the environmental impact report and preparing for the public hearing, are to be concurrent. That's my recommendation.. Mr. Mayor. Shearer: Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem Tice. Any other member of the Council wish to have -the floor. Tennant: I I think for those of you who are citizens of West Covina, I think you are well aware of my stands regarding the BKK landfill. Despite the Eutek odor study -and I think:they've done a good study and I think 'they give us some ways perhaps to improve odors at the landfill - but the fact remains that despite these recent improvements, a significant proportion of citizens in West Covina -still consider the BKK landfill to be a nuisance. They still feel there are odors and they are still • complaining. And because of this - if it was up to me,individually,I live a long way from the landfill, it's not a nuisance to me - but I am going to go along with those great proportion of citizens who con- sider it to be a nuisance and concur with Mayor Pro Tem Tice's recom- mendation that we should move to open up the public hearings by the Planning Commission. Shearer: Councilman Bacon, do you have any comments you would like to make. Bacon: Yes, Mr. Mayor. As most of you know', I am new to the Council, however, I am not new to the problem of the BKK landfill. I was appointed.to the Planning. Commission in West Covina back in about 1973 and the first thing we had before the'Planning Commission in 1973 was the revocation of the BKK permit because of complaints by the citizens because of odors. We went through many hours of public hearings. To prepare for tonight's meeting, I went through and read all the Minutes of those prior meetings, .reviewed everything that BKK promised the citizens back in 1973, and all the things we did. Back in 1973, the BKK Corporation said that this landfill would not be a health hazard. And they said this landfill would not produce odors. I believe that they have established that, the evidence is really overwhelming, it is not presently a health hazard. All the people who have testi- fied here before us - I was here at the meeting back in November. Although I.wasn't on the. Council at that time,vI attended and listened to all the testimony - I think it's clear that it's not a health • hazard. But I also think it's abundantly clear that it creates an odor. Very interestingly, back in 1962 when BKK first asked for the permit in this case, they made a promise right in the permit appli- cation that.they would not produce odors - flat-out. In 1976 that was amended. And now the wording of the amendment is that they will not produce odors that constitute a nuisance - rather a different thing between.the two. However, their testimony back in 1976 - their attorney, everybody else who came in 1974 and 1976 - was that they can operate an odor free landfill. . - 3 - .• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES . February 9, 1981 Page Four People have said that the landfill does not belong in 1-lest Covina and I. think everybody.in West Covina would like to have the landfill not in West.Covina. However, I think it is also very clear that -our society depends on having ability to dispose of the waste. We create them. We have to do something with them. And the idea that we could dispose of our waste by sending them up to Kettleman 400 miles away I think shows that that is simply not a viable alternative. The Palos Verdes Landfill closed the other day. They have to track their waste now many miles more.. They upped their rates because of that by eight dollars., That's about.a forty mile round trip that their trucks have to make nowadays. 'If it has a four hundred mile round trip, possibly.,,the fee for taking your trash away from you each month will go up to $$O or: whatever the amount might be, if you have that kind.of a trip. So -you have to have someplace and that someplace, -unfortunately, because of the fact that we have put this landfill here, is,. right for now, West Covina. But I, think the citizens who live in the area are entitled to' -have' BKK live up, to their promise that is to -have an odor free.landfill. I believe the Eutek report indicates that we have a possibility of achieving that result. I think the Eutek report shows that the.v can take the -steps within,'a reasonable foreseeable future which will reduce' most of the,odors..by some 97% of what they are now. That would 'get us down.to.maybe two or maybe three to five days of,odors per year. And I -'think" that that might be an acceptable level. I'm not.sure. But at least we would get to a point where it is possible for us to basically resol.ve this problem., Because,of these beliefs, I think that we should take the action that has been suggested by Mayor Pro Tem Tice. I believe this matter should no back to the. Planning Commission. And the Planning Commission should look into how they should either revoke, suspend or modify the permit so as to assure that we have an odor free operation, so far as. BKK. If they can't provide us with an odor free operation, it should 'be closed. Thank you, Councilman Bacon. Councilman Chappell, do you wish to make'some comments. I've been -on the Council some thirteen years. I was not one of the councilmen that voted to put this landfill in existence, as has been reported in the newspapar and I think that ought to be cleared up at this time._ Through these thirteen years as a councilman, my.fellow council- men and I have continually ,turned the screws on this landfill to hope- fully clear up the odor problem. A little over three years ago, after meetina with the management and ownership of BKK and.seeing the pro- gress they were obtaining and the results that I felt they were giving, I move? within far, far closer than many of you in the audience to BKK. I was really under the impression that.this could be solved. an(, so if y .family and I , bought a home very close to the landfill. So I too are a person who is smelling that landfill from time to time. e were - the City Council - we.were putting some handles on the landfill until the disastrous Calabasas situation, until Palos Verdes closed down, until several- other land sites and landfills that could handle this refuse were closed, and 4dest Covina became the fecal point of the whole County, part of Arizona,and part of. Neva,a. I went to the City Attorney when this happened and asked him to draw up an ordinance to ban Arizona,.Nevada, San Diego, Orange County, San Bernardino County, from using our landfill. -This was found to be illegal and we could.not do it. We have really put the pressure on BKK - this Council has...tale are certainly sympathetic`with'the.smell, and I far more sympathetic to'it than many of you in this audience that it hasn't happened. 4 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 9, 1981 Page Five And I'm sorry for that,'becaa'se these are fine gentlemen that operate • this landfill. Anything this Council has suggested, they have sent their people allover the world. I know of Germany, Israel, and a few other places they have sent their technical experts to try to figure out a handle on the landfill. It hasn't happened, so I, too, am in a position this evening to support the motion that Mayor Pro Tem Tice has put on the floor and hopefully this will accomplish what all of us are.looking for in this community. Shearer: The statement that I would .like to deliver at this time is, in essence, in concurrence with the comments of my colleagues. In reviewing all the available data there appears to have been progress made in reducing the level of odors from the landfill. How- ever, the City continues to receive odor complaints from the residents who believe the odors are a nuisance. I believe to continue the matter as we have been would only result in lengthy rhetoric without direction. It is my opinion that the City must begin the process to determine if the Unclassified Use Permit should be revoked, suspended, or amended. This will begin by the Council instructing staff and the Planning Com- mission to conduct public hearings.with appropriate notices, pursuant to the provisions of the Unclassified Use Permit No. 71, the City's Municipal Code, as well as -applicable state law. Just a brief expansion on the term "state law." It appears to me that under the Environmental Quality Act, the closing of the land- fill will require an EIR. The City can either recognize this.up front • or we can bury our heads in the sand and wait. It is my desire to bring this issue.to a head as soon as possible. Therefore, I believe we should instruct the Planning Commission to make a determination as to the necessity of an EIR. And if one is needed, to order its prep- aration. If we proceed without this step, I am afraid it will ulti- mately result in a much longer time frame. There's a lot at stake here. We will be closely scrutinized by many actors as this play un- folds. At any time the interest of anyone. who i-s best served, we can find ourselves in court. Recently the City closed Gemini Street, a street some may never. - have heard of, many of you have. It's in an area where most of our complaints come from and I.think many of you citizens are aware of the attempt by the City Council to respond to an interest and desire on the part of the citizens to improve the safety in' the area, and a wall was constructed that cut off Gemini, Street. There were some in the com- munity, not necessarily within the city limits of West Covina, who disagreed with that decision, and since no EIR had been prepared, went to court on that very issue. The court ordered us to start all over again - do an EIR, conduct hearings, etc. Using this as an example of what probably would happen, I believe we must face reality in face of none. It is my opinion that this matter must be pursued as expeditously as possible, recognizing all applicable laws, as well as the addage "haste makes waste." I would like to see any motion by the Council tostate that.this is our policy. At this time I can only guess where this will all really end, and I am keeping my guesses to myself. The • only commitment I am making is to do my best to expedite the matter and to continue to act in the best interest of all the citizens of West Covina. Are there any other comments on the part of any member of the Council at this time.. Tice: Mr. .Mayor, I request that under the circumstances and the deci- sions of this Council that the City Attorney read the resolution, which has'been;prepared in draft form, in its entirety rather than just a heading. - 5 - 9 i CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 9, 1981 Page Six Shearer: I have it here. If there are no objections, I will read it. (Mayor Shearer read the resolution in its entirety.) RESOLUTION NO. 6271 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF:THE CITY OF 14EST COVINA', CALIFORNIA, REGARDING UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 71, REVISION 5 - BKK CORPORATION Motion by Tice, seconded by Chappell to adopt the reso- lut'ion. Motion carried by roll call vote: Adopti.on of AYES: Bacon, Tennant, Chappell, Tice, Shearer Resolution No.' 6271 NOES: None Shearer: Motion carries five in the affirmative. We trust that this action will move ahead as we indicated. Where it will end,'I-think, is any- one's guess at this point. We could speculate all night as'to what the ultimate outcome will be. This is at least a positive step that will move in a direction that will force the matter to be resolved one way or the other. �,T­ennant: Just one quick comment: I see many people in the audience who for the past one, two or three years have advocated that this step be taken, and I think you should know that it's to a great extent due to,your.efforts that this process has finally ended up going in your favor, and that's called the democratic process in America. Shearer: I want to say one thing and I sometimes.have been accused by my .number one fan who isn't here this evening, my wife, for getting car- ried away. But I want to make sure that no one in the audience - we have. -had some positive reaction, that's nice to hear - those leaving here tonight thinking that all of a sudden it's going to be closed. We have in our country something called due process. And that involves the EIR and a whole lot of other things that this City has to follQt� to make sure -that -we don't, as I say, haste makes waste. Sometimes this due process may get in the way of getting things done. But.I.really think if we reflect on that, we really wouldn't want to trade that for some sort.of a totalitarian system that allows a dicta- tor'to make a snap decision and implement it right -a -way, because sometimes those decisions involve one's head or some other factor. All I'm saying is that don't expect a solution to this situation over- night. I have no way of knowing how, long it will go. I am hoping aid will do my best, and I'm sure,my colleagues agree, to see to it that it;,moves along as expeditiously as possible. END OF -VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTION Mayor Shearer stated that the City Attorney had requested authorization to file an amicus brief re the l awsui t re' P,eopl_e of the, State of. Cal i,f:: vs. Capri 'Pumping. He said the lawsuit is very similar to the suit filed by the City of West Covina re preemption of State law. City Attorney Council comments and discussion followed. Motion by - authori,ze,d� to;. file i- Tice, seconded. by Bacon, and unanimously carried to an ariiitcus bri.efauthorized the City Attorney to file an amicus brief. Recess Mayor Shearer called a recess at 8:05 PM. Council re- convened at 8:15 PM. The Mayor stated the.scheduled public hearing would be considered at this time and Oral Communications would commence at its completion. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 9, 1981 Page Seven HEARING 1) ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD 80-1 • PROSPERO DRIVE IMPROVEMENT HEARING ON THE PUBLIC NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS -OF - WAY AND CERTAIN EASEMENTS Assessment District AD 80-1 Location: East of Barranca, north of Cameron Avenue Acquisition of certain City Clerk Mooney verified the Affidavit of rights -of -way Mailing. Motion by Tice, seconded by Chappell, and unanimously carried to receive and file the affidavit. City Engineer Thomas presented the staff report. City Clerk Mooney stated that no written protests had been received. Mayor Shearer opened the hearing for oral pro- tests. No one in the audience addressed Council. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Council comments favored the.Prospero Drive Assessment District project. City Attorney presented: RESOLUTION NO. 6272 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE.CITY OF !JEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC -STREET AND'HIGH►.n1AY, GRADING; UTILITY, SEWER AND INCI- DENTAL'.. PURPOSES AND ALL USES APPURTENANT THERETO • (Assessment District AD 80-1 Prospero Drive) Motion by Tice, seconded by Tennant, and unani- Adoption of. mously carried to waive further reading of the reso- Resolution No: 6272 lution and to adopt. ORAL -COMMUNICATIONS Bob Jackson, President of the San Jose Little League, thanked Council for expediting the construction of the little league b.allfieIds at Shadow Oak Park and invited them to the little league opening.ceremonies scheduled Bob Jackson for March 28; 1981. Royal Brown Royal Brown,'2153 Aroma Drive, asked the following three questions: 1) Has the letter been -sent to the Galster Foundation re funding for repairs of Gal.ster Park. 2) Where can a copy of the Eutek study be obtained. 3) What is the current schedule .for the sale of the ballfield site. The Mayor stated the letter had been signed and directed staff to forward.a copy to Mr. Brown. The City Manager stated a copy of the Eutek report was available in .the City Clerk's Office, the Development Services Office, and the.library for review. Leonard Eliot stated that there was no schedule for .the,sale of the bal,lfield at the. present time. • AWARD OF BIDS 1) TS 81005-1 - AUDIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS Locations: Sunset/West Covina Parkway, Vincent/Garvey Avenue South Vincent/!Jest Covina Parkway TS 81005-1 Council reviewed staff's report. Audible pedestrian signals Motion by Chappell, seconded by Tice to accept the SIGNAL MAINTENANCE biId of SIGNAL_ MAINTENANCE, Anaheim, for $8,724.00 as presented at the bid opening on February 3, 1981, ` and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.' Motion carried by roll call vote: AYES: Bacon, Tennant, Chappell, Tice, Shearer NOES: None 7- • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 9, 1981 Page Eight 2) TRIMMING AND REMOVAL OF -CITY -PARKWAY STREET TREES BID NO. 81-83 Location: Various, throughout the City Bid -No. 81-83 Council" -reviewed staff's report. Trimming parkway trees Motion'by Tice; seconded by Tennant to accept the GLENDORA TREE SURGERY bid of GLENDORA TREE.SURGERY; Glendora, for $4,500 as.presented at the bid opening of February 4, 1981, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. Motion carried by roll call vote: T' Sh AYES.. Bacon, Tennant, Chappell, ice, Barer NOES;` None PUBLIC WORKS There were no Public 4ork items for this meeting. COMMISSIONS &`DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS RECREATION AND -PARK COMFIIISSION a) COVINA-VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY RECREATION AGREEMENT Community Recreation Agree- Council reviewed staffs report. ment with Covina -Valley Motion'by Tennant, seconded by Chappell, and unani- U.S.D. mousl.y carried to approve the Community .Recreation Agreement between the Covina -Valley Unified School District and City of West Covina for recreation.ser- vices and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. Cable Television CITY ATTORNEY Ordinance re -Zone Change No. 546 Adoption of Ordinance No..1504 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES b) CABLE TELEVISION ORDINANCE Council reviewed staff's report. Motion by Tice., seconded by Chappell, and unani- mously -carried to i) authorize staff to advertise a public hearing -for February 23, 1981, for the purpose of adopting a cable television ordinance, and ii) authorize staff'to secure proposals from consultants for the purpose of developing requests for proposals for cable television service in the .City of !lest Covina. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION RE ZONE CHANGE NO. 546 City.Attorney presented:. ORDINANCE NO. 1504 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY.OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP (Zone Change No. 546 - Ci.ty of LJest Covina Redevelopment Agency) Motion by Tice, 'seconded by Tennant, and unanimously carried to -waive further reading of the ordinance. Motion by Tice, seconded by Chappell to adopt the ordinance. Motion carried by roll call vote: AYES: Bacon, Tennant, Chappell, Tice, Shearer NOES: None' ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION RE SUBDIVISIONS City Attorney.presented: ORDINANCE NO. 1505 -.AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Ordinance re subdivisions OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ARTICLE 6, SECTION 20-73 OF THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE PER- - 8- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 9, 1981 Page Nine Ordinance re sub TAINING TO SUBDIVISIONS divisions (cont) Motion by Tennant, seconded by Tice, and unanimously carried to waive further reading of the ordinance. Motion by Bacon, seconded by Tennant to adopt the ordinance. Motion carried by roll call vote: Adoption of AYES: Bacon, Tennant,.Chappell, Tice, Shearer. Ordinance No. 1505 NOES: None " Recess for Mayor Shearer called a recess at 8:30 PM for the purpose Redevelopment Agency of conducting the Redevelopment Agency meeting. Council reconvened at 8:32 PM. CITY MANAGER 1) NEW BUDGET PROCESS AND CALENDAR Council reviewed staff's report. New budget process Motion by Chappell,,seconded by Tice, and unanimously and calendar carried to receive and file the staff report. City Manager Fast noted that the scheduled budget workshop for Council is March 2, 1981. 2) TRACT 39733 - HIMES & HIMES PROPOSAL FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES Council reviewed staff's report. Motion by Tice, seconded by. Chappell, and unanimously carried (Bacon abstained) to hold over any action on • this matter until February 23, 1981. MAYOR'S REPORTS 1) February 16 .- 20, 1981 proclaimed as NATIONAL PATRIOTISM WEEK 2) Letter from Southern California Association of Govern- ments re an appointment to the Hazardous haste Policy Advisory Committee. Mayor Shearer recommended the Mayor be appointed Appointments to Hazardous to the committee and Mike Miller be appointed the Waste Policy Advisory Com. alternate member. Motion was seconded by Tice. Mayor Shearer, Councilman Councilman Chappell volunteered to be the alternate Chappell and Mike Miller and suggested Mike Miller attend each meeting with the councilmember. Motion by Chappell, seconded by Tice, and unani- mously carried to approve the amendment to the first motion and appoint Chappell as the alternate member. Motion by Chappell, seconded by Bacon, and unani- mously carried to appoint the Mayoras the appointee. 3) Mayor She reminded Council of their joint meeting with the.Covina City Council scheduled for February 10 at 6:00 PM. COUNCILMEN'S COMMENTS/REPORTS'; Councilman .Chappell commented on the Governor's nro- posed reduction in bailout funds. Council concurred to wait until more information is available before taking any action. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS Motion by Tice, seconded by Chappell to approve Demands otaling $1_,596,371.75_as listed on UCB 83978 & 84224. Motion carried by roll call vote: AYES: Bacon, Tennant, Chappell, Tice, Shearer NOES:, None ADJOURNi"LENT Motion by Chappell, seconded by Tice, and unanimously car- ried to adjourn at 8:45 PM to 2/10/81 at 6:00 PM at the Northwoods Inn, Covina.for a oint meeting with the City Council of Covina... ATT S AY � - 9 - Iyour Chester Shearer i v ( lnrl IIAIAnA M Mnnnn