05-09-1966 - Regular Meeting - Minutes0
•
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA
May 9, 1966
The regular meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor
Krieger at 7:30 P.M. in the West Covina City Hall. Councilman Nichols
led the Pledge of Allegiance. The invocation was given by Mr. Flotten,
City Clerk.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Krieger, Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder
(from 7:35 P.M.), Gleckman
Others Present: Mr. George Aiassa, City Manager
Mr. Robert Flotten, City Clerk & Admin. Assistant
Mr. Herman R. Fast, Public Services Director
Mr. Harry C. Williams, City Attorney
Mr. Harold Joseph, Planning Director
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
April 11, 1966 m Approved as submitted as follows:
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Mayor Krieger, and carried,
that the Minutes of April 11, 1966 be approved as submitted.
April 19, 1966 - Approved as corrected as follows:
Mayor Krieger: On Page 6 of these Minutes there
is a remark attributed to Mayor
Nichols on the bottom of Page 6, second to the last paragraph. The
statement was made by myself.
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Mayor Krieger, and carried,
that the Minutes of April 19, 1966 be approved as corrected,
April 25, 1966 _ Approved as submitted as follows:
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, that the Minutes of April 25, 1966 be approved as submitted.
(Councilman Snyder entered the chambers at 7:35P.M.)
m:
C, C, 5/9/66
• 'CITY.'CLERKI'S 'R'tPORTS
•
•
PROJECT Nos,,SD- 6611 ANp S,P_ 6,611
ACCEPT STRRET AND STORM
DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
Rex W, Murphy
Page Two
LOCATIONS Workman Avenue, Lark
Ellen Avenue to--
Homerest Avenue,
APPROVED . Review Engineer's report,_ Accept --
street and storm drain.,improvements,
Authorize -release of The Western Casualty and.Sur.ety Company Bond
No, 343629 in .the amount 'of:a$499.919,00, Staff,,recommends acceptance,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum,,,and.carried,
to accept street and storm dra-in improvements,in Project.Nos. SD-6611
and,.SP-6611 and authorize'-releaae of The Nestern Casualty and Surety
Company Bond No, 34'3629 in the .amount of $49,919,001,
RESOLUTION -;NO 336.0
ADOPTED
(TD 119 Storm Drain Maintibmance)
Mayor Krieger:
The City Clerk. presented S
91,A Rts0LU .ION ,OF THE CITY COUNCIL
.OF T.-HE .CITY .0F WEST COVINA
-REOU'tSTING THE ;BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Of ,LOS.ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
00;NTR,OL:� DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF
CAILIFORNIA :To ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF
..)SA ,b .DI`STRICT. A TRANSFER AND
CO'XV�-YAN..CE OF STORM DRAIN IMPROVE-
M"ENTS ,.AND, .DRAINAGE SYSTEMS KNOWN
AS Tb119.:IN. THE `CITY OF WEST
COVINA FOR FUTUR£..OPERATION9
MAINTENRNCE,,REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENT"
H ar3:,4g no ..obj;ect:ions, we will
Waive further:.reading of the body
of .;tfie :.r.solu,t;a.on,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded , by ,;Counc llman..Gleckman, that
said resolution -be :adopted,.. Motion..._ ' skapd,: ;on: roll . _call ..a� >follaw S
Ayes- Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder9.Gleekman9-Mayor Krieger
Noes: None
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No, 33600
PROJECT NOS, SP-6513 AND SP-6328 LOCATIONS Pacific .and Willow Avenues,
ACCEPT STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Jasper N, Haley Accept street improvements.
APPROVED Authorize"release. of Hartford
:Acc�.dent and Indemnity Company
Bond No, 3285126'n the amount of $41,526,3:3, Staff recommends
acceptance,
Motion by Councilman Nicbiols, . ecbaded by+, Councilmah, Gleckman, and
carried, to accept'street`improv ments ip Project Nos, SP-6513 and
SP-°6328 and authorize release:of;'Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
Bond No, '3265126 in thJ amount:of $419526,13,
-2-
Co co 5/9/66
CITY''CLERK°S REPORTS Continued
• PRECISE PLAN N0,, 4469 REV,, 1
ACCEPT SIDEWALK AND
DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENTS
James Santiago Construction
APPROVED
Page Three
LOCATION: 19.45 East Garvey between -
Azusa and Baymar Avenues,,
Accept street improvements and
authorize release of cash bond in
amount of $500,, Staff recommends
acceptance,,
Motion by Councilman,Gleckman, seconded by Councilman Snyder, and
carried, to accept sidewalk and driveway improvements in Precise
Plan of Design No,, 446, Revision 1, and authorize release of.ca,sh bond
in the amount of $500,,00,,
PRECISE PLAN NO,, 3469 REV,, 1
ACCEPT SIDEWALK AND
DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Harker Development Corp,,
APPROVED
No,, 8017-11-29 in the amount of
acceptance,,
LOCATION° Southwest corner of
Glendora and.Cameron,,
Accept street improvements and
authorize release of Federal
Insurance Company bond
$19600,,00. Staff recommends
• Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded.by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, to accept sidewalk and driveway improvements in Precise Plan
of Design No,, 3469 Revision 19 and authorize release of Federal Insurance
Company bond No,, 9017-11-29 in the amount of $1,600,,00,,
PRECISE PLAN NO,, 3749 REV,, 1 LOCATION° West side of Sunset
ACCEPT SIDEWALK AND between Puente and
DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENTS Badillo,,
The Eleven Company
APPROVED Accept street improvements and
release New Amsterdam Casualty
Company bond No,, 1200/0636/0352/64 in the amount of $1,600. Staff
recommends acceptance,,
Motion by Councilman Gleckman, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and
carried, to accept sidewalk and driveway improvements in Precise Plan
of Design No,, 3749 Revision 1, and authorize release of New Amsterdam
Casualty Company bond No. 1200/0636/0352/64 in the amount of�-$1,600,,00,,
APPROVE FORMAL AGREEMENT TO LOCATION; Southerly 3 feet of the
PURCHASE TAX DELINQUENT LAND northerly 13 feet of
• Parcel List 88A Parcel 341,, (Approxi-
APPROVED mately 722 feet on the
south side of Badillo
Street west of Vincent,)
Review Engineer's report,, Authorize execution of formal agreement to
purchase tax delinquent' land for slope purposes,,
-3-
•
n
LJ
Co Co 5f9C66 Page Four
RGREEMENfi 'TO 'PURCHASE, TAX DELINQUENT LAND Continued
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and carried,
that the Council after reviewing this report authorize execution of a
formal agreement to purchase this tax delinquent land for slope purposes
..and authorize the City Clerk and Mayor to execute the contract in the
amount of $140 plus advertising costs,,
PROJECT SP-6407-2 LOCATION,, Southwest corner Azusa -
.APPROVE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS and Cameron Avenues,,
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED Review Engineer's report,,
Approve plans and specifications
for street improvements Project SP®6407®2,, Authorize City Engineer to
call for bids,,
Motion by. Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, to approve the plans and specifications for street
improvements, Project SP-6407®2; that the City Engineer be authorized
to call for bids,,
'PLANNING COMMISSION
TRACT NO, 25519
Evanwood Construction Company
APPROVED
LOCATION-. East of California,
north of Francisquito,
south of Lucille, and
west of Glendora,
Request for 23 Lots ® 6,,2 Acres - Area District II ®® Approved by
Planning Commission on May.4, 1966,
Mr.,, William Ells There is.one item that came up
3236 North Peck.Road after the Planning Commission
El Monte meeting, If you look in the
north portion of the subdivision
next to Lot 1, we would like to have the Council's permission if we can
work it out to include Lot 4 of Tract 29515 to the west in this
subdivision to straighten out this lot line as a normal knuckle type lot,
Mayor Krieger.-. We will mark this as Exhibit A
for Identification, Mr,, Williams,
is this material enough that it can be considered by the Council
without reference back to the Planning Commission?
City Attorney, Mr, Williams-.
include additional land,, In
referred back to the Planning
Mr, William Ells-.
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten-.
I think it would require a new
tentative if you are going to
that case I believe it would have to be
Commission,
conform to all R®A Area District II
and it should now read "All lots to
Review Board on Slight Modification
I wish to withdraw my request,
There is a modification of Item
No,, 1 of the conditions ®m
provisions of the Municipal Code
conform to the plan shown to the
No,, 42 and approved by the Board",
-4-
Co Ca 5/9/66
TRACT 'NO;' 15S,19 '� Co'ntiaued
Page Five
• Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, that Tract No. 25519 be approved subject to the original
conditions of.the Planning Commission and the additional condition
added.that all lots conform to the plan shown to the Review Board on
Slight Modification No. 42 and approved by the Board.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
Proposed.Southerly Annexation District No, 199
Proposed Southerly Annexation District No,, 200
..Proposed Southerly Annexation District No,, 201
Proposed Southerly Annexation District No. 202
Councilman Gleckman: I would like to see these go to
the Local Agency Commission as
an entity rather than have them split up. Nos,, 199, 200 and'201 are
contiguous to one another,.
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten: These are all inhabited and if you
lose the election you will lose
all of them.
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
• carried, that relative to Southerly Annexation District No. 199',
Southerly Annexation District No, 200, Southerly Annexation District
No. 201 and Southerly Annexation District No. 202, that the City
Attorney be directed to bring in separate resolutions consenting to
the commencement of proceedings on these annexations.
REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION OF MAY 49 1966.
Variance No, 586
Honeywell, Inc,
Denied
Councilman Snyder:
recollection there were some
this wall that may not have
Commission. I would like to
ANNEXATIONS 203 AND 204
So indicated by Mr. Flotten. The
following item was called up:
I would like to call up Variance
No, 586, Honeywell.. It was my
agreements or commitments made regarding
all been apparent to the Planning
review this.
City Clerk, Mr,, Flotten: In our annexation program we have
. been preparing these people in
the area south of town and coaching them on the procedures. They
brought these two final ones in with the petitions all signed and we
would like to request the City Council to deviate just one point from
the agenda and allow the Planning Commission to review these for
report,
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, that this matter be added to the agenda for tonight's meeting.
s5®
Co Co 519/66
'ANNEXATTGNS 2 01 AND 704 Continued
Page Six
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Snyder, and carried,
that Annexation No, 203 and Annexation No, 205 be referred to the
Planning Commission for recommendation and report,
SCHEDULED MATTERS
`SL'I7S
PROJECT N0, SP-6605
STREET IMPROVEMENT
LOCATION, Francisquito.between..
Sunset and Broadmoor.
Bids received in the office of the City Clerk 10:00 A,Mo`on May.4, 1966,
The bid received is as follows:
SULLY -MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 10a bid bond $69668,00
Motion by Councilman Snyder., seconded by Councilman Gillum, that the
bid of Sully -Miller Contracting Company for City Project No,.SPm6605
be accepted and the City Clerk and the Mayor be authorized to
execute an agreement with this contacting firm for the work in the
amount of $69668,00, Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Gleckman, Mayor Krieger
Noes: None
Absent: None
VARIANCE N0, 585
Richard Hughes
(Karls Garage)
APPROVED
LOCATION: 2529 East Workman
between Calvados and
Citrus Avenues,
and Request to allow a C-3 automotive
PRECISE PLAN NO, 489 repair center and expansion of
Richard Hughes present non -conforming identification
(Karls Garage) sign in Zone Cm2 approved by
APPROVED Planning Commission Resolution
No, 1887; request for approval
of the precise plan for an automotive repair center in Zone C-2 approved
by Planning Commission Resolution No, 1888, Called up by Council on
April 119 1966,,
Mayor Krieger:
Mr, Flotten, is there an affidavit
of publication and mailing on file?
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten: We have the affidavit. There were
12 notices mailed to property
owners in the area, (Read Planning Commission Resolutions Nos, 1887
and 1888,)
Mayor Krieger: This is the time and place for the
public hearing,
6-
C, co 5/9l66 Page Seven
VARIANCE NG,,-585 8. PRECISE 'PLAN NO 489 Continued
• IN " 'FAVOR
Firs, Eleanor Samuels. I am speaking in favor of the.
333 North Citrus Avenue variance., I feel this is
West Covina entirely in accord with the other
uses in our commercial neighbor-
hood,, I am here to ask the Council to consider one or two points. If
you will look at your map you'will see that on the description given
there.was a Parcel 2 which described the property which is owned by
Mr, Hughes and then in addition to that there is a Parcel 2 described
as a 30-foot easement extending north of which the property line is the
center., It also accepts from that easement for mutual use this strip
within his property, the westerly 15 feet of the alley. I believe
this easement is a thing with which the City Council or the City.Planning
Commission is not concerned., We -have had a mutual use of this alley,
half of which belongs to three owners of which I am one, The west
half belongs to Mr, Hughes, Does the City Council include the whole
area described as an easement projecting up into our property there and if
it -approves this9.eliminating the part, I am wondering if it might have
some effect of a legal cloud on that portion, For that reason, if it
is proper for you to do so I would like to ask the Council to delete
Parcel 2 and approve the request,
Mr, Richard Hughes The property in question is
• 1.981.6 Deep View Lane completely surrounded by auto®
Covina motive uses, Our objective is to
build an automotive service
center, Mrs, Samuels has expressed one of our other desires there if
this could be accomplished. If not, I don°.t want to cloud the issue
if this will delay our proceeding with it, We are negotiating an
exchange of land area there, I will end up with about the same area
and my square footage of my buildings would be just about the same,
If you have any questions, I will try to answer them,
There being no further public ,testimony, .the public portion of the
hearing was closed,
City. Attorney, Mr, Williams-, I think at this time you cannot
act on that possibility because
the notice of the property included in the variance and in the precise
plan described the property which is outlined tonight before you,
Since the notice which gives you jurisdiction did not include
additional property which might be exchanged for a portion of this,
you could not act on a precise plan covering property not included in
this notice, It would require a later amendment or a new plan.
The precise plan would not impair the alley, As to the matter of
whether or not there is an easement, I understand there is not a
recorded easement. It is a.question of whether there is an easement
by the users and that is a matter between the parties,
. Councilman Snyder-, I called this up because of the
sign, It is actually an
enlargement of an already oversized sign, However, to square this
off would be an improvement over the existing sign,
Councilman Nichols I notice on the summary of the
Planning Department it is stated
that the applicant had not provided the City with any definite plan as
to where the sign would be placed. Is this.to mean there is no know-
ledge on the part of the Planning Department that the sign is being
relocated? If so, doesn't this constitute an installation of a new
sign?
-7-
•
n
C C,, 5i9166 Page Eight
'VARIANCE .NO 5 8 5 8. PRECISE PLAN NO 4 8 9 Continued
Planning Directors, Mra Joseph-, No,, The plan submitted -with the --
application was a different sign,,
..At the Planning Commission meeting the applicant got up and stated he
would relinquish his rights to the sign proposed if he could square
it offo..The location and overall dimensions are the same,,
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and carried,
..that. Variance No,, 585 be approved subject to all the conditions of the
Planning Commission,, (Mayor Krieger voted "No",,)
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and carried,
that Precise Plan of Design No,, 489 be approved subject to all the
conditions of the Planning Commission,, (Mayor Krieger voted "No",,)
CHANGE OF NAME OF STREET
MERCED AVENUE TO MERCED PLACE
City Clerk, Mr,, Flottens
Mayor Krieger-,
LOCATION-, Old Merced Avenue from.
Glendora easterly to.
Merced Avenue Extension,,
(Read report re this matter,,)
This is the time and place for
the public hearing,,
There being no public testimony, the public portion of the hearing was
closed,
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Nichols, and carried,
that Resolution No,, 3552 stand as adopted and that the staff be
authorized to.proceed with the change of name as per their report,
AMENDMENT NO,, 7.5
City Initiated
APPROVED
and corner lot setbacks, approved by
No,, 1889,
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten-,
Mayor Krieger;
Request to amend Municipal Code
relating to signs, outside
stairways to apartments, Review
Board cases, off-street parking,
Planning Commission Resolution
(Read Planning Commission
Resolution No, 1889,)
This is the time and place for
the public hearing.
There being no public testimony, the public portion of the hearing was
closed,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, that the City Attorney be directed to draw the specific
ordinance to initiate Amendment Noo 75 as recommended by the Planning
Commission,
Motion by Mayor Krieger, seconded by Councilman Nichols, and carried,
that Amendment No, 75 be placed on -'a study meeting of the City Council
on the evening of Mondays May 16, 1966 at 7-,30 P.M,,
mgm
Co Co 5f9fs6
• RECREATION 'PARKS
ACTION OF APRIL 269 1966 MEETING OF
RECREATION &-PARKS COMMISSION
Page Nine
City Manager, Mr,.Aiassa.- Items 89 4, and 6 have to'do with.
the budget, I would suggest
you accept these matters and place them on file for further study at
the budget session,
Notion.by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Snyder, and
carried,.that this report be received and placed on file,
JOINT DINNER
City Manager, Mr, Aiassas It is a custom that during the
budget meetings we have a dinner
meeting with the Parks and Recreation Commission. I would like...to know
if you are still interested in such arrangements so I can start planning
now.
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and.carried,
that the Council extend an invitation to the Recreation and Parks
• Commission to meet with the Council on May 16, 1966 at 6.-00 at a
location to be determined by staff,
GENERAL MATTERS
ORAL. COMMUNICATIONS
JUNIPER TRAFFIC CONTROLS
Mr, Don Oscar
133 South Juniper
West Covina
Mayor Krieger. -
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None
•
The people on Juniper are asking
for a speed limit sign to be
posted on Juniper --and also a
stop sign to slow down traffic,
Under the City Manager's agenda,
Traffic Committee Minutes, this
matter will be taken up.
�'N
C. C. 519/66
• CITYATTORNEY
ORDINANCE INTRODUCTION
(Retirement)
•
•
Page Ten
The City Attorney presented. -
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT.BETWEEN
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WEST COVINA AND THE BOARD OF
ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA
STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM?'
City Attorney, Mr. Williams-, (Gave brief summary of this matter.)
A question which I raised is
there is.a 90®day.period to pay to the State after the effective date
which would be July 1st. The full amount of the employees'
contributions, Occidental agreed to pay that amount in three equal
monthly installments but the letter did not state which day the first
installment would fall on. If it comes on July lst there is plenty
of -time because there is July 1st, August 1st and September 1st. If
it started August 1st we probably would not receive the check.and get
into the hands of the State within 90 days because more than 90 days
expires, some months having 31 days. It has been verified that
Occidental intends to make the first payment July 1st. Therefore,
so far as the legal side of the contract is concerned, and I defer to
Mr. Church as to those aspects that relate to the acturial or insurance
side, I approved the contract and the ordinance and the ordinance is
-,-ready to be introduced if and when you are ready.
Mayor Krieger: What would be the last date upon
which this ordinance could be
introduced in order to be effective in time?
City Attorney, Mr,, Williams- That would depend on what days you
met, but the introduction of the
finance can't hurt anything. It's the passage of the ordinance that
can do somethidg. The ordinance must be passed before the end of May
in order to be'e£fective July,lst.
.Mayor Krieger: That mans We have one other
regular meeting in May or any
aZj.ourned meeting in May in which to adopt an ordinance which we would
,have to previously introduce. Introducing it hurts nothing.
Councilman Nichols:
Mayor Krieger:
Mr,, Church:
Councilman Gleckman-
Mr. Church:
Are you thinking of bringing
this up on the 16th for study?
Yes. Mr. Church, have all the
disability employees receiving
such signed their waiver?
I donut believe they have been
given the forms yet.
Isn't that necessary?
It will have to be done.
®10-
Co Ca 5/9/66 Page Eleven
'ORDINANCE INTRODUCTION ('RETIREMENT) Continued
. City Manager, Mr,, Aiassa- They have been mailed out but
have not been received,, They
have to be received before we can execute the contract,,
City Attorney, Mr,, Williams- I have an ordinance which does
not contain a Section 4 that
is in the exact form that the State submitted to us,, You have it
before you,, The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this ordinance
which is what we usually say but which is not necessary,,
Mayor Krieger- It is all the same except for
the wording of that?
City Attorney, Mro Williams- I have two changes,, The ordinance
that I have prepared is.exactly
the same except -that Section 2 says, "The Mayor of the City of West
Covina" and has no Section 4,, I will make.one further statement to
be completely accurate,, Where this ordinance spells the word "thirty
days" in Section ..3, I have used 11301" 9 where it says "fifteen" I have
used the figure "151" otherwise, the ordinances are identical,,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman,-.and
carried, to waive further reading of the body of the ordinance,,
• Motion by: Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Snyder, and
carried, that said ordinance be introduced,,
Motion by Mayor Krieger, seconded by Councilman Nichols, and carried,
that the proposed contract between the City Council of the City of
West Covina and the Board of Administration of the California State
Employees' Retirement system be placed on the agenda of the study
meeting of May 16, 1966,
ORDINANCE NO,, 966
ADOPTED
Z.C.363 - Marion
The City Attorney presented:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMEND-
ING THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE
SO AS TO REZONE CERTAIN PREMISES"
(ZC 363, Mack Marion)
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Snyder, and carried,
to waive further reading of the body of the ordinance,,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, that said
ordinance be adopted,, Motion passed on roll call as follows-
Ayes- Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Gleckman, Mayor Krieger
Noes : . None
. Absent- None
Said ordinance was given No,, 9.66,,
•
0
C, C, 5/9f 66
CITY ATTORNEY m Continued
ORDINANCE
HELD OVER
Z.C. 360 - Anderson
Page Twelve
The City Attorney presented°
??AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMEND-
ING THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE
SO AS TO REZONE CERTAIN PREMISES??
(ZC 360, Ray Anderson)
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and
carried*, to waive further reading of the body of the ordinance,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, that said
ordinance be adopted,
Councilman Gleckman.
City Attorney, Mr, Williams-.
If this is not adopted tonight
can it be held over?
Yes,
Action on Councilman Nichols? motion-. Motion failed on roll call as
follows;
Ayes: Councilmen Gillum, N�chols
Noes-. Councilman Snyder, Mayor Krieger
Absent; None
Abstained-. Councilman Gleckman
Councilman Gleckman-. In a prior ordinance I had been
advised having already sat in
judgment on that particular ordinance and even though a new hearing was
held before this Council of which I am a new member, it was felt that
I should not get involved as far as seconding the motion was concerned,
I feel in this particular case I have sat in judgment of this matter
at the Planning Commission level, I would have to abstain at this
time unless the hearing was reopened and the grounds are that at
Planning Commission level I felt proper grounds were not shown for a
zone change, At City Council level there was other testimony given
that I have read but there are questions I do have regarding that
testimony,
City Attorney, Mr, Williams
Is the tape
still available?
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten-.
Yes,
Councilman Gleckman.
If the City
Attorney rules that
upon hearing
the tape I would
be so qualified to vote, I would move that we hold
over this ordinance
until our next regular meeting,.
City Attorney, Mr, Williams.
I don't know
of any legal
decision that
disqualifies him
• from acting, He is in no different
position than
if he had heard
the testimony if he listens to the
tape, The only
question is having
been on the Planning Commission he
is reviewing his
own action,
Actually he took an action opposed
at the Planning
Commission level,
If he reviews it now and changes his
mind I don't
think there would.
be any question aboµt it,
Mayor Krieger.
Is there any
question if the
Councilman's
vote would be
consistent with what he did while serving
on another body?
-12-
C, C'o 5/9/66
ORDINANCE(ANDERSON) Continued
Page Thirteen
City Attorney, Mr, Williams° I cant say there is no question,
I don't know of any decision of
the court that states that a Councilman cannot act after he is elevated
to the Council upon a matter that appeared before on the Planning
Commission, If it were a matter that appeared in court, normally a
judge elevated to a higher court cannot hear a decision of his, However,
in this case a body made a decision, I know of no specific disquali-
fication, I would prefer- he didn't make the motion or second it,
I think there is less chance of challenge,
Motion by Councilman Gleckman, seconded by Mayor Krieger, and carried,
that this matter be held over to the next regular.meeting of the Council,
ORDINANCE The City Attorney presented:
HELD OVER "AN ORDINANCE OF.THE CITY COUNCIL
Truck Routes OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMEND-
ING SECTION 3140 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO TRUCK'ROUTES11
Motion by Councilman Gleckman, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and --
carried, that this matter be held over to the first meeting in June,
ORDINANCE NO, 967 The City Attorney presented;
ADOPTED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
(Banners & Pennants) OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMEND-
ING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE
WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO BANNERS AND PENNANTS"
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, to waive further reading of the body of the ordinance,
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Gillum, that said
ordinance be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes; Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Gleckman
Noes-. Mayor Krieger
Absent: None
Said ordinance was given No, 967,
RESOLUTION NO, 3361
ADOPTED
• (V. 584 - Mazelsky)
Mayor Krieger-.
The City Attorney presented;
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
GRANTING A VARIANCE" CV 5849
Mazelsky)
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,
-13-
0
is
•
C, C, 5/9/66
'RESOLUTION NO 3361 Continued
Page Fourteen
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, that said
resolution be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes; Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Gleckman, Mayor Krieger
Noeso None
Absent; None
Said resolution was given No, 3361,
RESOLUTION NO, 3362
ADOPTED
(P. P. 486-Marion)
Mayor Krieger:
The City Attorney presented:
SPA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
APPROVING PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN
N0, 486" (Marion)
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the body
of the resolution,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, that said
resolution be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Gleckman
Noes: Councilman Snyder, Mayor Krieger
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No, 3362,
RESOLUTION
HELD OVEN
(P,P,485 - Anderson)
The City Attorney presented:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
APPROVING PRECISE'PLAN Or DESIGN
N0, 485" (Anderson)
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, that
this matter be held over to the next regular meeting in order to
come up before the Council at the same time as the ordinance applicable
with this property,
Councilman Gleckman: We have had_.presented.to*us`tonight
a new precise plan incorporating
some of the suggestions I have made. What are we holding over? Are
we holding over the precise plan approved by the Planning Commission
or the precise plan that has been amended?
Mayor Krieger:
a resolution to approve or disapprove
is to hold over that precise plan to
Councilman Gleckman:
presented here? In
City Council are we
What are we to do?
plan if we are going
amended anyway,
The Council action was on the
original precise plan, We have
that precise plan, The motion
the next regular meeting,
Is it possible to amend that
precise plan to meet what is being
order'to amend the precise plan presented to the
to use'this to amend? Are we to amend it at all?
There.is no sense in delaying action on the precise
to be talking about something that is going to be'
-14-
•
C, C, 5/9/66
RESOLUTION: (ANDERSON) -'Continued
Mayor Krieger:
Page Fifteen
How many precise plans do we
have before us on this Anderson
property?
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: You only have the one on this
application and on this agenda
item, The City Clerk received this plan this evening, I don't
think the Planning Commission has seen this plan,
Councilman Gleckman: That answers my question.
Action on Councilman Nichols' action° Motion failed, (Ayes:
Councilmen Gillum, Nichols- Noes: Councilmen Snyder, Gleckman, Mayor
Krieger,)
Mayor Krieger: I would suggest that an amended
precise plan has to be sent to
the Planning Commission for a new hearing'.
City Attorney, Mr, Williams: If there is an amended precise
plan filed actually it is a new
precise plan and starts all over again, If the changes are only
in conditions that can be worded approving the precise plan that is
before you but changing the conditions, you need not hold it over and
send it back to the Planning Commission; you may merely reword the
conditions under which this precise plan was approved, I believe
this was originally held over for additional conditions. Even though
you have a new map if by wording you can still relate to the old map
And make the changes in the form of conditions, you need not send it
back,
•Planning Director, Mr, -Joseph: The map shows parking shifted
around and I think there would
..have to be a study on that, There may or may not be adequate parking,
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and carried,
that this matter be referred to the staff for an additional report at
our next regular meeting having to do with the procedure to be followed
on this precise plan in cooperation with the City Attorney,
RESOLUTION NO, 3363
The City Attorney presented:
ADOPTED
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
(Annexation 197)
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
CONSENTING TO.THE COMMENCEMENT
OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY
DESIGNATED AS 'SOUTHERLY
ANNEXATION DISTRICT NO, 197"'
Mayor Krieger:
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,
-15-
C6 C. 5/9/66
'RESOLUTION NO,, 3363 Continued
Page Sixteen
. Motion by Councilman Gleckman, seconded by Councilman Nichols, that
said resolution be adopted,, Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes,, Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Gleckman, Mayor Krieger
Noes,, None
Absent; None
Said resolution was given No,, 3363,,
RESOLUTION N0,, 3364 The City Attorney presented -
ADOPTED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
(Annexation 198) OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT
OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY
DESIGNATED AS 'SOUTHERLY
ANNEXATION DISTRICT NO,, 1981"
Mayor Krieger- Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,,
• Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Snyder, that said
resolution be adopted,, Motion passed on roll call as follows,,-
Ayes- Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Gleckman, Mayor Krieger
Noes- None
Absent- None
Said resolution was given No,, 3364,,
'CITY MANAGER
SKELTON PROPERTY USE
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and
carried, that the City Manager get an informal appraisal of the value
of this property for the possibility of public sale,,
POLICE STATION PAINTING AND
REPLACEMENT OF AIR CONDITIONER
• Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Sn der to authorize y ,
the staff to proceed immediately to arrange for air conditioning at the
cost of $875,,00 plus the completion of the remodeling which involves
painting at a cost of $19325,,00 representing a total cost of $2,200,,
Motion passed on roll call as follows-
Ayes- Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Gleckman, Mayor Krieger
Noes- None
Absent- None
m16®
C, Co 5/9/66 Page Seventeen
'CITY MANAGER m Continued
• PERSONNEL BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULES
CONSULTANT'S RECLASSIFICATIONS
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and carried
that the Council adopt and approve the West Covina Fire.Department
Rules and Regulations as prepared in the booklet entitled "West Covina
Fire Department Rules And Regulations",
Motion by Councilman Gleckman, seconded.by Councilman Nichols, and
carried, to direct the preparation of the resolution incorporating
the proposed amendment to personnel rules.
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Snyder, and.carried,
that the Council adopt the recommendations for reclassifications as
shown on the report of May 3, 1966 submitted by the Personnel Board.
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, to direct the City Attorney to prepare -a resolution to
amend Resolution No. 1277,
TRAFFIC COMMITTEE MINUTES
May 6, 1966
Mayor Krieger° We had an oral communication
tonight directed to an item on
the Traffic Committee.Minutes having to do with Juniper Street which
is.Item No, 1 in that report, .
Mr, Don Oscar We requested a stop sign on
133 South �Tuniper Juniper going down to stop
West Covina that flow of traffic going so
fast. Just the one stop on
Juniper and Norma,
Councilman Nichols, When there are citizen requests
for action of onettype or another
and the Traffic Committee meets to consider these requests, are the
citizens invited to attend that meeting?
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Councilman Nichols:
Normally not,
How does the citizen know the
basis of the action and the logic
of the action?
City Attorney, Mr, Williams-. "Normally we notify them of the
•action after the Council has
actually finalized the Minutes of the Traffic Committee,
Councilman Nichols: It would seem to me that an
appropriate way would be for
the Mayor to read the item,- the discussion and the decision, so the
gentleman present who has an interest in it is aware of what the
action wasand why it was and to direct that the Chairman of the
Traffic Committee meet further with the gentleman to answer any
additional questions.he may have and to explain it further and to
enable him to return.again before the Council if he is still concerned.
about it,
-17-
•
1]
CO. C'., 5/9/66 Page Eighteen
TRAFFIC COMMITTEE -MINUTES (5/6/66) = Continued
Mayor Krieger: We will make available to this
gentleman a copy of these
Traffic Committee Minutes and he will be able to glean from them the
discussion,
Motion.by Councilman Gleckman, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and
carried, that the Traffic Committee Minutes of May 6, 1966.be approved
and accepted,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, s-econded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, that the City Manager be authorized to recommend to the City
Council any suggested procedures in the Traffic Committee meetings
and include in their deliberations should be the aspect of the
present lack of'communication, its action, and the individual citizens
of the community who seek action through that Committee,
REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
April 289 1966 m May 2, 1966
Motion by Mayor Krieger, seconded by Councilman Nichols, and carried,
that the item of Slight Modification No, 48 be called up before the
City Council at the first available meeting date,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and carried,
that the Review Board Minutes of May 2, 1966 be approved and placed on
file,
CONSIDERATION OF ENDORSEMENT OF
MWD WATER BOND ISSUE
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, that the
West Covina City Council go on record as endorsing the Metropolitan
Water District Bond Issue for improved services and distribution
facilities in the amount of $850,000,000 by adopting this resolution,
Councilman Snyder° I would like to comment that I
cannot vote for this resolution
for several reasons. First, there is some question in my mind as to
the equity of the method of taxation and the equity of the method of
spreading this bond issue over the district, There is also some
question as to the need of a district for these feeder lines at this
time plus the indication that was given before our area went into the
Metropolitan Water District that at least an implied indication that
such a bond issue would not be -required and the argument was used that
the additional expense of going to the four cities would have required
a bond issue and we are now being asked to vote for probably a bigger
one for MWD, I vigorously oppose this resolution,
Mayor Krieger:
made a representation to 'this
not contemplating a bond issue
main feeder lines they intend
Foothill Feeder Line which wou
respect to the allocation for
community that is taking serio
is<one councilman that I know
I don't know of any time that
the Metropolitan Water District
Council or anyone else that they were
to finance feeder lines, One of the
to finance with these monies is the
ld serve this specific area. With
the cost of this improvement, the only
us exception to the issue even informally
of on the City Council of the City of
m18®
C, C, 5/9/66
Page Nineteen
'CO'NSIDERATION OF ENDORSEMENT OF MWD WATER BOND ISSUE ,Continued
Los Angeles who has suggested that the City Council of the City of
Los Angeles reconsider its endorsement because his position is that
it is an unfair allocation. The allocation is based upon assessed
property valuation and on a dollar basis the City of Los Angeles is
paying more for this type of a program than the outlying areas which
includes our owns
Councilman Snyder: I am aware of that but it makes
me wonder if they are capable
of' presenting and spreading this fairly, why do they do it this way?
It seems to me a complete study of the MWD taxing system plus their.
taxing power plus their allocation of the bond money should be made,
Action on the motion of Councilman Nichols: Action passed on roll call
as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Gleckman, Mayor Krieger
Noes: Councilman Snyder
Absents None
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION APPOINTMENT PROCEDURE
Councilman Gleckman: I feel this is a recognized
commission and it probably,would
be the best method in my opinion to appoint these commissioners as we
do for the rest of our commissions:
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, that the Council direct the City Attorney to prepare an
amendment to the resolution for the Human Relations Commission that
would create the appointment of its members by the entire Council
rather than by individual Councilmen; that no other part of that
resolution be changed,
CITY COMMISSION SALARIES
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Nichols, and
carried, that this matter be referred to the study session meeting of
May 16, 1966 for discussion at that time,
REVOCATION AND SUSPENSION OF..LICENSES
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Nichols, and carried,
that this matter be referred to .the study session of May.16, 1966 for
discussion,
TRAFFIC'PROBLEM
Lark Ellen and Cameron
Motion by Councilman Gleckman, seconded by Councilman Nichols, and
carried9 that this matter be accepted and, placed on file,
®19m
•
C
C, C. 5/9/66
'CITY MANAGER ® Continued
GENERAL..TELEPHONE HEARINGS
Page Twenty
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, to
appropriate $650,00 for counsel fees in connection with the General
Telephone Company extended area service hearings, Motion passed on
roll call as follows:
Ayesa Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Gleckman, Mayor Xrieger
Noese None
Absente None
RESULTS OF REBIDDING FOR UNDERGROUND
STREET LIGHTING ON PORTNER STREET
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
This is informational only.
Councilman Nichols° The amount of money quoted -in
the low bid of $1,300 and some
dollars,' I believe that is a firm figure that will definitely be
the.cost to..these people -or is there any possibility that it might
later be changed?
Public Services Director, Mr, Fast: I have talked to representatives
of Portner Street and advised
them of this bid that came in, I told them there was on deposit with
the City approximately $19550 and that it was our intent to award
the contract for this amount and it would be a fixed price unless
something came up and they would be fully appraised -of that and asked
their permission during construction for this and that we would return
whatever'is remaining of the money back to the property owners, I
indicated we would hold this until such time as the work is completed,
Mayor Krieger: I would like to compliment the
staff for their work on this
particular matter, They realized an appreciable savings to the people
on.Portner and were able to realize their desire for underground lighting,
LEGISLATIVE BULLETIN FROM LEAGUE
OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
AB135
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: They want the cities to support
AB135, There seems to be need
for clarification of the 1911 and 1913 Acts, I think the Council
• should direct the Mayor to send telegrams to_the Governor urging
support for this matter,
Mayor Krieger; This provides a method of
h financing the cost of converting
overhead utilities lines to underground,,
Councilman Nichols: I would like to see the bill and
what kind of method -it is -before
I sing out in praise of it to Sacramento,
m20®
C
C. C, 5/9/66 Page Twenty -One
LEGISLATIVE BULLETIN FROM'LEAGUE_„OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (ABl35)- Continued_
City Manager, Mr, Aia$,sas
Mayor Krieger:
HEARINGS ON FREEWAY ROUTES
I don't.think we have time,
There will be no motion on this
matter,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and
carried, to place the letter of April 21, 1966 relating to this..,matter
on. file,
POLICE STATION OPEN HOUSE
May 14, 1966
Motion by Councilman Gleckman., seconded by Couneilman:Gillum, and
carried, that the report in this matter be accepted and placed on.file,.
'CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO, 3365
ADOPTED
(Annexation 193)
Mayor Krieger:
The City Clerk presented;
"A -RESOLUTION OF-THE.CITY COUNCIL
OF•THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF. -NOTICE
OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE A
PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS °SOUTHERLY
ANNEXATION DISTRICT NO, 1931 AND AN
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION THEREOF
AND APPROVING THE CIRCULATION OF
THE PETITION"
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,
Motion by Councilman Gleckman, seconded by. Councilman Snyder, that
said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows;
Ayes; Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Gleckman, Mayor Krieger
Noes; None
Absent; None
Said resolution was given No, 3365,
CITY TREASURER
None
-21-
CO Co 5/9/66
. "MAYOR ° S REPORTS
•
POPPY DAYS
May 27 and 28, 1966.
Mayor Krieger:
CLEAN-UP, PAINT -UP, FIX -UP MONTH
May, 1966
Mayor Krieger:
Clean-up, Paint -up, Fix -up Month,,
MOOSEHAVEN HEALTH CENTER WEEK
May 16 to 229 1966
Mayor Krieger:
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY WEEK
May 22, 1966
Mayor Krieger:
NATIONAL REALTOR WEEK
May 22, 1966
Page.Twenty-Two
If there are no objections, I
will proclaim May 27 and May 28
as Poppy Days,,
(No objections voiced,,)
So proclaimed,,
If there are no objections, I
will declare May, 1966 as
(No objections voiced,)
So proclaimed,
If there are no objections, I will
proclaim May 16 to 22, 1966 as
Moosehaven Health Center Week,,
(No objections voiced,)
So proclaimed,,
If there are no objections, I will
proclaim the week of May 22, 1966
as United Cerebral Palsy Week,
(No objections voiced,,)
So proclaimed,,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, that this matter be added to the agenda,,
-22-
Co C, 5/9/66
MAYOR'S REPORTS - Continued
Page Twenty -Three
• Mayor Krieger.- I would object to the phrasing
of the proclamation and I would
not care to proclaim this proclamation except upon the wishes of the
majority of the Council. The language proposed is to proclaim the
advantages of real property ownership and the security obtainable in
buying, selling or leasing real property through a professional realtor,
Councilman Nichols; The Council has always left
this to the discretion of the Mayor,
Mayor Krieger.- There will be no proclamation
in this matter,
CITIZEN COMMITTEES
Mayor Krieger -
At our adjourned meeting of last
week the Council authorized me
to proceed initially with steps to create citizens committees in areas
of concern to the community and I indicated to the Council.I would
bring back this evening for your consideration a priority list of those
activities that I would intend to create with'your approval. This list
is a priority list for your consideration, These committees would
iinvolve 13 separate citizens committeesinitially in the areas first
of the Civic Center; swimming pool; annexations; five-year capital
improvement program; General Plan updating; City charter; Huntington
Beach freeway; water resources; recreation and park improvements;
traffic flow and circulation; commercial revitalization; cultural
enhancement including a regional auditorium; and Citywide beauti-
.fication, 'I have a draft of a letter that I am going to ask Council
approval to mail to each resident owner in 'be City of West Covina
directly, I will. circulate this letter and this priority list among
you for consideration with your approval at the study meeting of May
16th, At that time I hope to receive from you criticisms and suggestions
as to the number of committees, the priority of the committees, the
desirability of sending a personal letter to each resident owner of
the city, and if you do approve the mechanism of communication as to
the proposed content of the letter.
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and
carried, that the items under discussion be placed on the agenda
of the special meeting of May 16, 1966,
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT STUDY
Mayor Krieger; This Wednesday, May llth, there
will be.a meeting of the
property owners in the Central Business District here at City Hall
at 7:30 P.M,, upon invitation that :was mailed approximately two weeks
ago over the Mayor's signature, I, -will have a report to the Council
as to the results of thatmeeting by our next .regular meeting,
-23-
C. C. 5f9%66 Page Twenty -Four
MAYOR'S REPORTS - Continued
• STUDY MEETINGS
Mayor Krieger; There was a request by certain
Councilmen and concurred in by
the entire Council that there should be a series of study meetings
by this Council to consider various matters of -importance within the
community, I, in turn, asked the 'Staff to prepare for me for sub-
mission to you a list of.major items that would warrant possible
study sessions, This list contains 17 items, I can assure you that-_
certain of these items will require one or more study meetings alone,
I intend to have this list duplicated and circulated among you before
the meeting of the 16th and I would like the Council in execution of
its policy to set study meetings on all or as many of these items as
you wish to discuss at study meetings,
Motion by,,Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gleckman, and
carried, that the list of priority items for future study sessions
come before the Council at its study meeting of the 16th of May, 1966
for review and the establishment of priorities for future study sessions,
MONTEREY INSTITUTE
Mayor Krieger.- With regard to the Monterey
Institute, I believe all of you
received communications from the League of California Cities concerning
this.institute that will occur this month. I can remember two years
ago attending the meeting in Santa Monica and coming away with the
impression that it was well worth while. These meetings are being
held this year at Monterey County Fair Grounds on Sunday, May 22 and
Monday, May 23, I think it would be appropriate if any of the new
Councilmen or any of the other Councilmen wish to attend this meeting
that this Council consider this an expense item which should be
authorized by the Council,
Councilman Gleckman.-. I would be interested in this.
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Snyder, that
Councilman Gleckman.be authorized to attend and represent this
Council where necessary at the League of California Cities meeting
at. the Fair Grounds in Monterey with all necessary expenses up to but
not exceeding $1,75.00 paid by the City of West Covina, Motion,passed
on. roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder, Mayor Krieger
Noes: None
Absent; None
Abstained.-.' Councilman Gleckman
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT
Councilman Gillum: I would like.to direct this
to Mr, Aiassa; Sometime last
year the Junior Chamber of Commerce made a study that the City invested
a certain amount of money in-e Where does that stand at this time?
-24-
G, Co 5/9/66
'JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT Continued
•
City Manager,, Mro Aiassa*
Page Twenty -Five
We will have a report by the
23rd of this month,,
Motion by Councilman Nichols,, seconded by Councilman Gillum, and
that the Council direct the City Manager to communicate with the
Junior Chamber of Commerce and eXpress our concern over the long
in receiving the reports from the study and survey that they made
and urging them to furnish copies rof the report to the Council as
soon as reasonably possible
NEWT TEMPLIN°S DEATH
Councilman Gleckman*
the Council but Newt Templin,, the
away on Saturday,, I feel that we
the widow of Mr,, Templin not only
of his services to our City,,
carried,
delay
It is not a happy occasion that
I,bring this to the attention of
County Road Commissioner,, passed
as a City should send flowers to
because he passed away but because
Motion by.Councilman Gleckman,, seconded by Councilman Gillum,, that
the City send -'lowers to Mrso Newt Templin not to exceed $10,,00,,
Motion passed on roll call as follows*
Ayes* Councilmen Gillum, Nichols,, Snyder,,. Gleckman,, Mayor Krieger
Noes* None
Absent* None
Motion by Councilman Gleckman,, seconded by Councilman Gillum,, and
carried,, that an appropriate resolution be drawn up commending Mr,,
Templin for his services to the City and returned for the Council
approval,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS ACADTMY GRADUATION
Councilman Gleckman, I attended the graduation of
two of our officers at the
Riverside County Sheriff's Academy on May 6th, Two officers, Richard
.B, Demblin and Daniel R, Leonard did very well, Officer Demblin
was one of the first ever to shoot 100% on the firing range, He
alsa received the award as the person receiving the top firearm award
there and also his work while there he was in one of the five top -note-
books which they prepare while. being at school, Officer Leonard,
who I believe was our first cadet, placed in the top five in the final
examination,, Both officers represented the City very well,
INTERVIEWS
Mayor Krieger* Tomorrow our intervieAs start at
seven oeclock and they are
going to run until eleven at fifteen -minute intervals,, We will also
have: to reschedule some additional interviews because we have had
additional acceptances* Tomorrow night we will try to agree.on an;
additional date for interviews,
m25®
•
0
0
Co CO 5/9/66 Page Twenty -Six
DEMANDS
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Gillum, to approve
demands totalling $3719726008 as listed .on demand sheets B240
and C503 through C505o This total includes bank transfers of
$2039000a00 and fund transfers of $979450072o Motion passed on roll
call as follows;
Ayes: Councilmen Gillum, Nichols, Snyder9 Gleckman, Mayor Krieger
Noeso None
Absento None
There being no further business, Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded
by Councilman Gillum, and carried, that this meeting be adjourned at
10e15 PoMa to May 16, 1966 at 7e30 PoMo
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
-26-