11-09-1964 - Regular Meeting - Minutest
is
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA
November 9, 1964
The regular meeting of the City Council was .called to order by Mayor
Snyder at 7:40 P.M. in the West Covina City Hall, Councilman Jett
'led the Pledge of Allegiance. The Invocation was given by Mr. Gordon
Bond of the First Baptist Church,
ROLL CALL
Present, Mayor Snyder, Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath
Others Present: Mr. George Aiassa, City Manager
Mr, Robert Flotten, City Clerk & Admin. Assistant
Mr, Richard R. Terzian, Acting City Attorney
Mr. John Q. Adams, Public Services Director
Mr. Harold Joseph, Planning Director
Absent: Mr. Harry C. Williams, City Attorney
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
September
28,
1964
October
5,
1964
October
131
1964
October -
19,
1964
Approvedassubmitted as follows:
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath, and carried,
that the Minutes'of September 28, 1964, October 6, 1964, October 13, 1964,
and October 19, 1964 be approved as submitted.
CITY CLERK'S REPORT.
RESOLUTION NO, 3034
Project S.P. 6504
OCTOBER
Mayor Snyder:
The City Clerk presented
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
ACCEPTING A CERTAIN WRITTEN
INSTRUMENT AND DIRECTING THE
RECORDATION THEREOF" (Project
SP 65048 Joe W. & Sara E. Barkley)
Hearing no objections, we will.
waive further reading of the
body of" the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath, that said
I resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as.follows-
Ayes: Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes: None
Absent: None
Said Resolution was given No. 3034.
-1-
t
C, C, 11/9/64
CITY CLERK'S REPORTS. Continued
RESOLUTION N0, 3035
Project So Pe 6504
ADOPTED
Mayor Snyder-,
Page Two
The City Clerk presented:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
ACCEPTING A CERTAIN WRITTEN
INSTRUMENT AND DIRECTING THE
RECORDATION THEREOF" (Project
S,P, 6504, Harold R, 6 Dorothy I,
Miller)
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: We have a memo directed to the
City Manager and the City Council
from R, E, Pontowq,City Engineer, dated November 6, 1964 re this matter,
I would like this memo spread.in full on the Minutes. -
"A Grant Deed has been received for the property at the
northeast corner of Valinda and Merced Avenues from Harold
Miller and Dorothy Miller, We have been verbally informed
that the Miller property is now in escrow and that the buyer
will pay for street improvements amounting to $2,953,00,, said
amount having been previously approved by the City Council,
Escrow is expected to close in two (2) weeks,
"It is proposed to proceed with the Valinda Avenue project,
S,P,6504, under the assumption that the funds will be furnished
by the buyer when needed, Should he fail to furnish funds, this
work can be removed from the contract by change order and a
temporary sidewalk installed by City forces to allow school-
children to cross at the Merced-Valinda intersection where the
crossing guard is,
"Recommendation
"It is recommended that.the Resolution accepting this Deed
be approved by the City Council,"
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath, that said
resolution be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows. -
Ayes: Councilmen. Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes: None
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No, 3035,
RESOLUTION NO, 3036 The City Clerk presented.
Assessment Dist. No. A'11-61-2 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTED OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
PROPOSING TO CHANGE THE WORK IN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, A°11-61-2"
Mayor Snyder: Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,
-2-
A
r�
U
I
Co C, 11/9/64 Page Three
RESOLUTION NO, 3036 - Continued
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Jett, that said
resolution be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes: None
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No, 303.6,
RESOLUTION NO, 3037
Sanitation District No. 15
ADOPTED
Mayor Snyder:
The City Clerk presented:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
GRANTING CONSENT TO THE ANNEXATION
C)f A PORTION OF SAID CITY TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 15 OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY"
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Heath, seconded by Councilman Krieger, that said
resolution be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes: None
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No, 3037,
LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO,LA-62-1 LOCATION: Lot 3, Tract 220971,
APPROVE REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT Northwest corner of
OF ASSESSMENT Virginia and Grand,
Joseph V, Dal Cerro
APPROVED Approve a refund of $17,63 from
amount of over -assessment
charged on above lot, Charge to Street Lighting District Account 841,
Review Engineer's report, Staff recommends approval of refund,
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten: You have a memo from Mr. Adams
regarding this,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath,, that the
Finance Officer be directed to refund $17,63 to Mr, Joseph V, Dal Cerro
and that this be charged to Street Lighting District Account No, 841,
Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes: None
Absent: None
-3-
I
•
r -I
L
C, C, 11/9/64
CITY CLERK'S REPORTS a- Continued
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT
Page Four
Mr, Chris Tambe: You should have a copy of the
report representing the activities
of the Chamber for the first quarterly period 1964-65 fiscal year, If
you have any questions I will be happy to try to answer them for you,
Mayor Snyder: Are things going as scheduled?
Mr, Chris Tambe: I believe so,
Councilman Nichols: I would like to 'say from what I
have been able to observe in
recent months the Chamber is moving actively and vigorously into its
promotion of the headquarter city concept and I think the Council and
the community owes them a vote of.thanks and good wishes for continued
aggressive work in that area,
Mr, Chris Tambe:
Councilman Krieger:
Mr, Chris Tambe:
On behalf of the entire Chamber,
thank you,
Mr. Tambe, on..Staff Activities
which is Item 4 on Page 3, is
that continuing?
Yes, it is continuing,
Motion by Councilman Heath, seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
to accept the report of the Chamber of Commerce in relation to the
headquarter city program and express our thanks to the Chamber for
a job that is being very well done,
Mr, Chris Tambe: I would like to express on
behalf of the Chamber our
sincere appreciation for the fine efforts of the City staff in
cooperating with us at every stage of the game, It wouldn'.t.be
possible for us to carry out the clauses of our mutual agreement
without the cooperation of the staff and, of course, yourselves,
CITY ATTORNEY
ORDINANCE NO, 891
Lone Change 321, Delaney
ADOPTED
The Acting City Attorney presented:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
AMENDING THE WEST COVINA
MUNICIPAL CODE SO AS TO REZONE
CERTAIN PREMISES" (ZC 3219
Delaney)
Councilman Heath: I have had a'call from a repre-
sentative of Mr. Delaney and
also from a number of people living in the area concerned and they have
stated that they have held a meeting recently and have .formulated a
petition to be presented to the Council, Upon reviewing this petition
after it had been signed by quite a few people, there was an error
discovered in the legal description and it is now on its way back to
being re signed by all of these people, The request came to me was if
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Five
-ORDINANCE NO, 891 - Continued
• I would relay the request to hold this matter until the next meeting
at which time they would like to present their petition to the City
Council and ask your consideration of it,
•
•
Councilman Krieger: The only objection I would have
is that petition would constitute
additional or new evidence before this Council and if we are going.to
take such a petition at that time I would tend to think we should re-
open the entire matter,
Acting City Attorney, Mr, Terzian: This is the second reading of
the ordinance,
Councilman Heath: After reviewing the petition
the Council may feel they would
like to open the entire hearing, I think the request has come in all
sincerity and I see no particular reason for rushing into this since
it is the applicant who is being favored by his own zone change and
is requesting the delay,
Move that this matter be held
over to the next regular meeting so this Council can review the
petition that is expected to.come before it,
Mayor Snyder:
It seems to me a petition is
not additional evidence; it is
evidence after the fact,
Councilman Jett: I don't see how we could make
any different ruling. The
only reason they can have for requesting this would be the hope that
they would get a higher zoning or a different zoning and I don't
see how we could do that under- the circumstances without going back
for rehearings,
Councilman Krieger: It was the applicant that appealed
it from the Planning Commission
and based upon that appeal the City Council took this action and for
us to now say we will await taking final action on this so the applicant
or people favorably disposed of his position can resubmit a petition
that we then consider we may wish to reopen the hearing is somewhat
speculative and tentative and there is nothing before us at this time
that would suggest we should do otherwise than proceed, I don't doubt
the sincerity of the people but I do question the procedure they ask
us to follow in this matter,
Councilman Heath:
Councilman Jett:
see how we can change it at this time,
Mayor Snyder:
I don't think it would do any
harm to hold it over,
I think they have every right to
file another petition but I don't
Councilman Heath's motion dies
for lack of a second,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
to waive further reading of the body of the ordinance,
-5-
C, Ca 11/9/64 Page Six
'ORDINANCE NO, 891 Continued
• Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Jett, that said
ordinance be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols,, Mayor Snyder
Noes.- Councilman Heath
Absent: None
Said ordinance was given No, 891,
ORDINANCE INTRODUCTION
Fees and Charges
HELD OVER
City Manager, Mr, Aiass4:
Mayor Snyder:
ORDINANCE INTRODUCTION
Amending Sections 2422 and 2424
Of The West Covina Municipal Code
The Acting City Attorney presented -
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE
WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO FEES AND CHARGES"
We would like to hold this off
until the 23rd.
All right,
The Acting City Attorney presented:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
AMENDING SECTIONS 2422 AND 2424
OF THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO THE PERSONNEL
SYSTEM"
Motion by Councilman Heath, seconded by Councilman Krieger, and carried,
to waive further reading of the body of the ordinance,
Motion by Councilman Heath, seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
that said ordinance be introduced,
RESOLUTION N0, 3038
Amending the Personnel Rules
ADOPTED
Mayor Snyder:
The Acting City Attorney presented.-
°PA. -RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY`OF WEST COVINA
AMENDING THE PERSONNEL RULES AS
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO, 1277
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WEST COVINA"
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,
MM
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Seven
RESOLUTION NO, 3038 ® Continued
• Motion by Councilman Jett, seconded by Councilman Krieger, that said
resolution be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows°
Ayes- Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes- None
Absent- None
Said resolution was given No, 3038,
'SCHEDULED MATTERS
HEARINGS
AMENDMENT NO, 5 TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN
City Initiated
HELD OVER
not previously included in the General
Commission Resolution No, 1691,
Request to amend the Comprehensive
General Plan of the City of West
Covina so as to include that area
to the south of the La Puente
Hills, down to Valley Boulevard,
Plan, approved by Planning
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten- Notice of this public hearing
appeared in the West Covina
Tribune on October 29, 1964, (Read Planning Commission Resolution
No, 1691,)
Councilman Heath- The West Covina Municipal Code
states that the Mayor and
Council determine the agenda and it can be changed or modified as
the majority of the Council sees fit, I think it is up to the
Council as to whether they want to change the agenda,
Mr, Chuck Dowding:
We would object to these
matters being heard together,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath, and carried,
that Amendment No, 5 to the Comprehensive General Plan, City Initiated,
and Zone Change No, 319, Home Savings and Loan Association, be heard
concurrently, (Councilman Nichols and Mayor Snyder voted "No",)
ZONE CHANGE NO, 319 LOCATION- Easterly of Pass and
Home Savings 8 Loan Assoc, Covina Road at Amar
HELD OVER Road,
Request to reclassify from Zone Cml, C®3 and R-1 to Zone Rml and R-2
19 approved by Planning Commission Resolution No, 1692,
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten- The notice of this
public hearing
appeared in the West Covina
Tribune on October 29, 1964, There were 159 notices mailed to property
owners in the area on October 289.1964, (Read Planning Commission
Resolution No, 1692,)
Mayor Snyder: This is the time and place for
the hearing on both of these
matters,
-7-
I L-j
C, Ca 1119/64
AMENDMENT NO, 5 6 'ZONE CHANGE NO, 319 Continued
IN FAVOR
Mr, Graham Ritchie
1117 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles
Home Savings is trying to do with
trying to do with this increment
entire plan,, We have with us the
and he will run through the basic
why it is necessary to go to the
to the Council,,
Page Eight
I am the attorney for the applicant,
Home Savings and Loan,, I think you
do have to consider the entire
concept of the plan, what it is
the entire property and what they are
of the property in relation to the
architect who has planned the project
concept we are dealing with here and
type of zone change we are suggesting
When we started two or three
years ago we had a piece of property that was in the process of
annexation to the City and we did certain basic planning on it and the
planning resulted in the existing zoning pattern which you are all
familiar with, This was based on a somewhat conventional treatment of
the land, After the completion of the -annexation proceedings we
consulted with William Pereira 6 Associates and after a year and a
half of planning which involved at least six months to a year of working
with the staff of the City, consulting with the school districts, we
came up with a concept of developing this land which was somewhat
different than the original zoning but one which did not produce a
greater density on the land. We basically are talking about a plan of
development of single family housing, some of which is detached and
some of which is in a town house type of development,,
A factor which I think is
important -® Home Savings owned the property when the annexation
proceedings started; they still own the land; they are coming before
you now with a proposal to develop about 350 acres and their proposal
has to be looked at in terms of the fact that they are putting up
their money and their investment and they will be back before this
Council many more times for the development of the balance of the
property,, They are investing this with the thought they have something
good,.unique, something marketable and they think it is good for the
City and if they didn't I don't think they would start with it because
they are going to be back for more development of this land,, They
have the confidence in the architect and the confidence in the plan and
they hope the Council will have the same kind of approach to it, The
Planning Commission felt this was a consistent type of development of
the land; that it led ultimately through the entire planning of the 1800
acres to an amalgam with the City of West Covina, We think this is a
good plan and we have brought it before you and ask that you approve
it also, We will try to answer any questions you may have,
Mr, William Pereira (Presented various slides and
5657 Wilshire Boulevard explained same,,) In our 1800
Los Angeles acre plan for West Covina of
which this is a part, the total
we have occupied in terms of residential is 50% of our total area,,
Presently;West Covina occupies 55,6%. In the commercial areas we
occupy 4,7% of the 1800 acres where in West Covina it is 5,8%o We
have 25% in quasi public and recreational areas as opposed to ll%,,
Our streets and the washes, et cetera, are 20% and presently in West
Covina it is 25%, We have no industrial, which is zero against 1,,2%,,
I think it generally means a very high quality development, In our
breakdown of the public use of land, we have 239 acres made up of the
Little League park, the golf course, schools, dedicated streets, and
C, C, ll/9/64 Page Nine
AMENDMENT NO, 5 & ZONE' CHANGE NO', 31.9 _ 'Continued
that is 64% of the total of the land, The breakdown in our housing
is 135 in this case with 360 of the total, The total here is 373,
Our total density is 2,96 units per acre, That is total gross density,
Mr, Graham Ritchie: Basically we applied for R®1.
R®2 zone change at the recom-
mendation of the staff as being necessary for the type of housing which
we were proposing here, We are still talking about single family
housing, It is just when you have party walls you no longer can do this
sort of thing in the existing Rml zone, The recommendation was to
file for the R®2 zoning and we have done that, Unless you have any
questions, we have nothing further,
TN OPPOSITION
Mr, George MacCormick One of the reasons for objecting
421 Manington Place to both these items being heard
West Covina simultaneously is as you are
aware you got a very good lesson
on the precise planning which the proponents discussed, We feel this
more properly belongs with the precise plan when it comes up for hearing
because what we are talking about is the kinds of development that will
satisfy the R-1 and Rm2 zones as we have them in our ordinance at the
present time, We feel in spite of what the proponents say they are
not really looking at their neighbors, In our City we already have
two large shopping areas, We have had problems with zoning around
these particular pieces of property, We have had traffic problems
back and forth between these two centers, They have created many
unusual problems, What the proponents are suggesting is that way down
at the very bottom of our map they establish a third business area,
They have said they have within this area 20 acres of nothing but parks.
We have been very fortunate in securing that kind of area up here in
our own particular civic center and commercial developments, This
means that the people who will be living in this area will not be
supporting the things that we have all worked so strongly to create,
our civic center and the surrounding commercial developments. Is this
really a development that is a part of West Covina? No, They have
this area sealed off by a series of fairly high hills, By far the
majority of the people living in this area live at the southerly
edge of it, not up where they would ordinarily attempt to drive into
the rest of the City. We are going to have a further problem because
this is not a city, another ,shopping center within our City. We only
have half of that city, The)other half will reside in the City of
Walnut, This creates major problems to us as taxpayers because you
are going to have to have many facilities just to serve this
specific area, Are we going to establish a separate city within the
City of West Covina or more specifically are we through the approval
of the change to our general plan going to have half a city in our City
limits? The zone changes that are being requested we are told is a
research project; they are developing super blocks by having very
conveniently contrived land area in such a way it forms greens, This
is very fine but they have also overlooked some rather significant
problems. If you will notice we have a mottled area, one in which we
are interposing the R®2 and R-1 rather haphazardly around the land-
scape, We believe this requires additional consideration by the
Planning Department and that it is not good planning as such, The
traffic problems all of the various areas we have had so much difficulty
with already are going to be even more serious in developments of this
kind,
Co Ca 11/9/64 Page Ten
'AMENDMENT NO,, 5 8 ZONE CHANGE NO,, 319 Continued
Mrs,, Marjorie Gaines You have before you what appears
914 West Barbara to my eyes to be an ideal plan
West Covina for a communeof upwards of
20,000 people,, Perhaps in some
places communes have their place but in a country as wealth as ours
is in open land I ,fail to see how human beings can benefit by being
stacked on top of each other,, This piece of property showed a general
plan for a high class residential development with neighborhood facilities,,
After having studied our extensive staff report and discussing the
area with other home owners, Home Savings' new proposal seems to fit
into the catagory of West Covina's largest and newest potential slum
area,, If we allow Home Savings to proceed with this we can claim the
distinction of having our own brand new built-in slum instead of the
choice residential development Home Savings led us to believe was their
intention when this property was annexed to our City,,
The R®2 zoning for which they
asked was created only recently for the expressed purpose of handling
problem pieces of property which were unsuitable for development in
another catagory or for the purpose of insuring a very high quality
development imposed in high density zoning,, This zone was not
created merely as an excuse to build condominiums, row houses,
cluster housing or any of the other terms used to describe communal
living,,
To illustrate the substandard
type of development this is I would like to call attention to the fact
that although Home Savings was informed several times of the necessity
of adequate park area and facilities they have seen fit to provide
only 3 8/10 acres of park land to serve almost 4,000 people, This is
the first increment,, West Covina standards ask for a minimum of 10
acres per 39500 population,, By West Covina School District standards
the average site of elementary schools is 10 acres exclusive of ball
parks,, Home Savings was also well informed of this but nevertheless
restricted school sites to 8 1/2 acres which includes ball parks,,
Home Savings provides a projected population figure for the entire
development of about 40,000,, There is no reason for assuming that
figure is in anyway accurate,,
In order to justify any zone
change the burden is on the applicant to prove that a need exists
within the City for this proposed zone.. change, a need other than
the need of the developer to reap the most bountiful harvest possible,,
Speaking as a home owner and taxpayer of the City of West Covina I
fail to see where this requested cone change and resulting development
meets any need in West Covina and far from being beneficial in any way
appears extremely detrimental,,
Mr,, Chuck Dowding I am Chairman of the West Covina
1605 South Belmont Home Owners' Federation,, Mr,,
West Covina Ritchie proclaimed there would be
no greater density than in the
original development and I ask him to prove it,, I will prove otherwise,,
This whole presentation by Mr,, Pereira and the staff report is one of
the greatest figure juggling exhibitions I have ever seen,, (Presented
the following charts and explained same: "Exhibit A. General Plan
Amendment"; "Exhibit B, General Plan Amendment"; "Exhibit C, General
Plan Amendment"; "Exhibit D. General Plan Amendment" "Exhibit E.
General Plan Amendment"; "Exhibit A. First Increment Zoning Comparing
Existing Zoning vs,, Proposed Zoning"; "Exhibit B. First Increment
Zoning, Comparing Existing Zoning vs,, Proposed Zoning",,
_10-
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Eleven
AMENDMENT NOd 5 6 ZONE CHANGE NO, 319 ® Continued
We have some recommendations
relative to these things -we are considering tonight, We recommend
that the General Plan be sent back to the staff and the Planning
Commission and that the whole thing be reviewed on an independent basis
based on the scaling factors of a general plan and that we come up with
a unified appendage to our City and not a satellite city, We further
recommend that the existing zoning on the general parcel now in the
first increment is quite logical in terms of the historical development
of this City and the proponent hasn,°t given any evidence why we should
change it,
Mr, Ralph M, Goldstein
1546 Cameron Avenue
West Covina
Owners' Federation and also as a
I am speaking both as the Vice
Chairman of the West Covina
Home Owners' Federation and as
the representative of the Home
resident for ten years,
I am amazed this would come up
for consideration in the City of West Covina, I have had the highest
respect for our planning staff and the Planning Commission and I don't
see how this got by, When I see row housing of this type coming into
West Covina with the standard of housing size of 700 to 1300 feet in
rows, I am really shocked, In the introduction of their report they
talk of this being something that goes along with our present concept
of the headquarter city of San Gabriel Valley, I would like to read
you an excerptfrom a pamphlet put out by our own Chamber of Commerce
this year in putting out the publication for general use of what
is the headquarter city of West Covina,
"United States census figures
for median income, education, home values and all other median or
average figures available placed beside the median for West Covina
will show these people to leave the average far behind. A look about
the City will show the results of this initiative. Lovely homes
abounding with healthy children predominate, with an average family
income of over $10,000 annually, The West Covina family is afforded
the opportunity for many types of activities. There are over 2500
residential pool owners, If a city is as solid as its citizens, West
Covina has a firm foundation,"
I ask you is what they are
going to bring in here going to be consistent to that or do we have to
add an asterisk at the bottom, "They are putting in something new
and different," If they want to put something new and different in
West Covina I want it to be a better development,
Mr, George MacCormick- We would like all the home owners
here tonight opposing this
development to please stand, (So indicated,)
• REBUTTAL
Mr, Graham Ritchie- In the year and a half we have
worked on this nobody from the
group that has spoken to you tonight has contacted us or suggested to
us any alternate plans. I do know we have sweated blood with the staff,
fought them on every possible kind of issue trying to work out problems
that are mutual to them and to us, and this is not our report -® it is
their report and it merits your study and I am sure you have all studied
Ca C, 11/9/64 Page Twelve
AMENDMENT NO. 5 & ZONE CHANGE NOa 319 ® Continued
•it, We have tried to work out the best possible development we can
for this property, It is easy for somebody to come along with figures
I don't understand as .you go through -them already I can see errors,
We have tried to provide for the recreational facilities; we have tried
to make a sensible well balanced community out of this, If you want
comparisons I suggest first of all that you refer to Page 7 of the staff
study which shows that the°total residential acreage is 50,1% as opposed
to 55,6% in the City of West Covina; that we have 25,1% in quasi
public and recreation as opposed to 11,.7%,
When we appeared before this
Council two years ago the zoning was granted on this property, part
of the projected development was.a land reclamation site which was to
be turned into a golf course when it was filled and that was 12 years
hence, We have decided instead to come along with a golf course at
this time, partly for our own benefit and partly for your's and it
will enhance the development now, add interest to it and make the
homes more marketable, You are getting a golf course today along with
this development in the first increment rather than 12 years from now
when the sanitary land fill site is finally.filled. I think this is
an advantage the City of West Covina should weigh along with the other
things, We are making some concessions in order to come up with this
kind of development and yet we still feel it is not only a good develop-
ment but the best one for this kind of land, The trap that some people
seem to fall into is that they talk about R®1 units as if they were
somehow substantially different from the R®2 units that are going to
be placed on this property and they are not that much different,
We aren't marketing apartment houses here; we are marketing single
family houses, The only difference between them is that in some of them
they will be detached and others will have party walls, They will be
sold to individuals, We have had total cooperation from all of the
school districts; we have provided two elementary sites in this
increment, They determined the size and location of those sites,
They will determine the size and location of every future site, We
determined there would be a location for the high school site somewhat
northerly of its present location. The high school district wanted
it in another direction and we moved it because that is what they
wanted, We have worked with the school districts and we have agree
in principle that where park sites are provided insofar as possible
they will be provided in conjunction with school sites. In every way
possible we have tried to cooperate with your school districts and
with the staff, We feel this is a good plan and a good concept,
Mr, Leon Rudderman Some of the arguments brought
Executive Vice President up by the opposition in terms
Hai C, Tan, Architects of arguments by labeling,
communes, Rm2 multiple type
density, struck a responsive chord because I happen to live in a
"commune" in the City of Fullerton, We met with this particular
community and spent six months in convincing them this was a better
way of developing single family residential housing, After the
first development was completed, our second attempt in bringing in
a cluster type project in the highest level area of Fullerton was
completed in,.19 days with the full blessings of the Council,
Mr, George MacCormicko We feel this gentleman has
introduced new evidence,
-12-
•
•
•
Co Co 11/9/64
AMENDMENT NO. 5 & ZONE CHANGE NO. 319 - Continued:
Mayor Snyder:
Mr. George MacCormick:
Mayor Snyder:
Page Thirteen
It is not new evidence when it is in
answer to a question or in answer to
what you have said.
He brought what he considers to be
first-hand evidence of his own-:
That is additional information.
I would interpret it as being in an-
swer to what was given in opposition.
There being no further public testimony, the hearing was closed.
Councilman Heath: There was a tentative zoning placed
on this property when it annexed to
the City, a map which you have all seen. Also on that map there was
zoned 1.18 acres of commercial, and the Council at that time questioned
the size of the commercial area and it was the explanation and under-
standing between the Council at that time and representatives from Home
Savings and Loan that the Commercial was 118 acres but at a later date„
no doubt, there would be requested a change of the outer perimeter of
this commercial to be changed to multiple dwelling as a buffer. There
was anticipated to be multiple dwelling in this tract at the time we
adopted the zoning plan before and the records will bear this out.
Councilman Krieger:
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph:
Mr Joseph, has the staff ever been
presented with the statistics that
the opponents have brought to us
this evening?
No. I haven't seen them before this
evening,
Councilman Krieger: Mr. Aiassa, to your knowledge has
anyone else in the City ever been
presented with this information. that the Council, is asked to consider
tonight?
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: No. This is the first presentation.
Councilman Krieger: I have a question of the opponents.
Why was this information not presen-
ted to the Planning Commission.?
Mr. Chuck Dowding: First it has been our experience that
the Council more often than not has
an independent point of.view on these sort of developments. There is a
point of our intelligence breaking down, Some of these hearing were at
the end of the summer, starting of school, but our intelligence brck.e do%�.rn
and the evidence as it came through was slow in coming. biro Joseph's
extensive report on the Minutes of the meetings, et cetera, over an
extended period didn't become available until the very night that I
spoke out against the general plan and the zoning, I would like to
go on record that we did appear before the Planning Commission and
talked against this but we didn't have a chance to generate this infor-
mation because most of it is generated out of Mr. Joseph's report, T
apologize for not being able to develop.the information at an earlier
date but it wasn't available to us and we didn't know of its availability
until it was too late.
-13-
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Fourteen
"AMENDMENT N0, 5 & ZONE CHANGE NO, 319 Continued
. Councilman Krieger: I appreciate the confidence
that people seem to vest in
this Council, our ability to absorb matters and to digest statistics
of this type, It seems to me if I may pursue this that it might well
dispose this Council to have the same critical review of these
statistics that the proponents had of their statistics in our staff
report because I would like to have for my consideration the full
benefit of the professional staff within this City as well as our
Planning Commission's consideration, I appreciate the jurisdiction
is now vested in this Council but I also appreciate that we have a
Planning Commission in this City to whome some opinions to the contrary
notwithstanding we do place and vest confidence in their ability to
judge some of these matters and speaking only for myself I would like
to have further consideration of some of these factors that have been
brought before us tonight so we can weigh it in the true perspective,
This is a big item, a big subject, We are going to be setting a
precedent in a critical area, This isn't anything where it befits
us or it is going to do justice to the citizens of this City to
necessarily reach a decision on this matter right this minute,
•
C�
Mayor Snyder-, I wouldn't want to leave the
impression that there are new
statistics here; it is only a new way of looking at them,
Mr, Chuck Dowding: I would be pleased to cooperate
with the staff in going over how
the figures were arrived at,
Councilman Jett: Mr, Pereira, I believe you
mentioned we are a City of
boat owners and somewhat sports -minded, The thing that concerns
me, have you made provisions for storage -of vacation trailers and
boats?
Mr, William Pereira: We have several types of single
family'housing in this first
increment and could obviously accomodate a boat or trailer, whatever
the demand might be,
Mayor. Snyder- Has this zoning been granted
in Walnut or have you proceeded
with your proceedings in the City of Walnut?
Mr, Graham Ritchie:
Mayor Snyder:
Mr,, Graham Ritchie:
No,
Do you anticipate any problem
there?
We have kept them fully informed.
We have not made any application,
Mayor Snyder: Do the present ordinances -permit
this type of precise plan without
variances?
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph: We don't have a planned develop-
ment ordinance. I suggested
going for R®2 although our Rm2 was not written with this in mind, At
one time we had before the Planning Commission a planned development
ordinance which the City Attorney was not in favor of and following
-14®
Co C, 11/9/64
Page Fifteen
AMENDMENT NO, 5 & ZONE CHANCE NO, 319 Continued
ispublic hearings it was dismissed by the Planning Commission, We don't
have any ordinances right now that would permit this kind of a project
to be carried through,
Mayor Snyder-.
Is it because this is a new
concept?
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph-. I think so, Still pending before
the Planning Commission are the
unclassified use permit, the precise plan, the variance and the tract
map9 all of which have to do with the first increment, The Planning
Commission has held these to their meeting of December 2 at which time
we hope to have a full Planning Commission and we hope the City Council
will give direction in terms of general plan and zoning before that
time,
Mayor Snyder: If we are going to refer this
back to the staff then we have
to do it to ask them to look at the validity of these figures and we
have to ask the staff and ourselves, does this proposal compromise
our general plan, If it does', and there are several unique factors
that apply to it that doesn't apply -to the rest of the City, it seems
to me, it is one large development which makes the street and traffic
flow problem less because the developer can put these into best fit
with what is built and this should be no problem at all, I think what
we are interested in is does this compromise the general plan for the
rest of the City,
Councilman Nichols: I would favor Councilman Kriegerls
suggestion in this matter, I
think it is of such importance not only in relation to this particular
development, to the proponents, the opponents, but to the City for a
good long time in the future, It is very easy to say that establishing
three or four hundred acres out of the 1800 acres in no way commits anyone
but I think it is a precedent and I think it should be explored more
thoroughly in all its ramifications before a final action is taken
by this Council, I would concur with the Mayor that the validity of
these figures should be checked and I would also suggest that the
validity of the figures of the proponents be equally rescrutinized
by our own staff, When we come back at this again we will have as
complete a degree of information as is possible,
Mayor Snyder:
The comment has been made
to seek the aid of the
planning staff, Do you mean the
staff or the Commission?
Councilman Krieger:
I mentioned both,
Councilman Nichols:
It seems a shame to me that a
project that has more impli-
cations from the City of West Covina
than most I have heard of any
recent times has to be crowded on
an agenda, crowded with items of
importance to many people so that
both the proponents and opponents
feel they are in a situation where
they must rush through and leave
out portions of their testimony,
I think it is neither fair to the
proponents or the opponents and I
think the scheduling of a matter
like this sandwiched in between a
full agenda is something I would
prefer not to see and if this is
to come back before us at a later
date I would appreciate it as a Councilman to request that it be so
set that there is ample time for all the remaining aspects of this
to be considered,
-15-
•
C, C, 11/9/64
AMENDMENT NO, 5 8 ZONE CHANGE NO, 319 ® Continued
Mayor Snyder:
Page Sixteen
I think you are probably correct,
This should be the only agenda
item at a special meeting,
Councilman Heath: If it is Mr, Krieger's intention
to send this back to the
Planning Commission for report without specifics and have them report
back to us whether they agree with their previous recommendation or do
not agree with this previous recommendation, I think I would like to
see him put it in the form of a motion and I will second it,
Councilman Krieger: Under the circumstances with
the hearing closed and a
reference back, does this require the consent of the applicant?
Acting City Attorney, Mr, Terzian: No, it does not, Material new
evidence has been presented in
the form of these new statistics which was not presented to the
Planning Commission and in that case the Council can refer it back
to the Planning Commission as long as material new evidence was
presented to the Council at their meeting, There does not have to be
consent on the part of the applicant,
Councilman Krieger:
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph:
Mr, Joseph, your Planning
Commission is not going to sit
in bank until December 2?
That's correct,
Councilman Krieger: Our first regular meeting of
the Council would be December 143
The first regular meeting in the month of December?
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Yes,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath, and carried,
that Amendment No, 5 to the Comprehensive General Plan (City Initiated)
and Zone Change No, 319 (Home Savings and Loan Association) be
referred back to the Planning Director for a staff report and to the
Planning Commission for a Commission report on Minutes of this
meeting tonight and on the exhibits presented to the Council tonight
both by the proponents and the opponents for a report back to the
Council at a meeting held on December 71, 1964 for the sole, specific
and express purpose of determining the disposition of Amendment No, 5
to the Comprehensive General Plan and Zone Change No, 319,
PRECISE PLAN NO, 435
William B. Lane
HELD OVER
Request for approval
Commission Resolution
October 23, 1964,
LOCATION: 247 Barranca between
Walnut Creek Wash ar)d
Mesa Drive,
of precise plan for apartments approved by Planning
No, 1698, Appealed by Elbridge A. Tucker on
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten:
(Read Planning Commission
Resolution No, 1698,)
-16-
f
C, C, 11/9/64
PRECISE 'PLAN NO', 435.m Continued
Mayor Snyder:
IN FAVOR
Mr, William Lane
247 South Barranca
West Covina
Page Seventeen
This is the time and place for
the public hearing,
We had zoning on this property
approved over a year ago, We
think we have a good plan for
this land,
Mr, Leon Rudderman I represent the architectural
4100 West Commonwealth firm of Hai C. Tan 6 Associates,
Fullerton (Presented redering and explained
same,) In the traffic circulation
pattern Barranca does not penetrate directly into the development, We
bring in our own street from Virginia, I am sure this development will
be a positive aspect compared to most of the Rm3 type of developments
you are familiar with, I would be happy to answer any of your questions,
IN OPPOSITION
Mr, John F, Koonce I would like to call on members
3323 Toni Drive of the East Hills Home Owners'
West Covina Association who in the main oppose
some parts of this development,
Mr, Mel Berkman The only thing we ask now is
3005 Mesa Drive to remember that you promised
West Covina that the rights of the home
owners surrounding this and
the other future apartment developments on the east end of town would
be 100% protected, The people along Mesa by prior right have a
distinct right to their view that looks out to the north and we feel
the way this project is designed with some of the buildings erected
on the bluff they are being deprived of this right, We feel you should
make very sure that the roof elevations of these structures are below
the grade elevation of those people living on Mesa Drive,
Mr, Elbridge Tucker (Presented map and explained
2915 Mesa Drive same,) I live at the top of
West Covina the bluff. The complaint is
directed to how this property
shall be developed. My major interest is how much setback should be
required for the protection of those property owners along Mesa Drive
from this proposed development, There are no hillside apartment
developments in West Covina yet that I know of, Your action this
evening may be setting a precedent in the handling of these matters,
(Presented photographs to Council and explained same,)
Mrs, Elbridge Tucker We think this is a beautiful
2915 Mesa Drive development and we expect Mr,
West Covina Lane to have a reasonable profit
from his land only as his profit
does not decrease the value of our land, When this was presented to
the Planning Commission at that time they were not aware that the
building would be 10_feet higher than the bluff because I was not aware
they were going to take new pictures, I have pictures I would like to
have you look at to see what 10 feet above the bluff looks like and
what a 23-foot building looks like 20 feet away, A new plan has been
filed and the buildings came down 11 feet in height, According to
m17®
Co Co 11/9/64
Page Eighteen
PRECISE PLAN NO, 435 - Continued:
this plan the patio is not a part of the building and yet the roof
goes over it, I am merely asking you to be reasonable as we are trying
to be. I am speaking for the Shroders, the Martins and the Tuckers.
Mr. Melvin Crouse The points we have made are
321 South Charvers Avenue that previous City Councils and
West Covina Planning Commissions have given
us the impression that buildings
would be kept off this slope. These people are entitled to the beauty
and air space of this development because they have been there. It
does seem customary to have 50 to 100 feet between R-1 and R-3 structures,
I would like all the people in the audience opposing this precise .plan
to please stand up. (So indicated.)
REBUTTAL
Mr. Leon Rudderman: The suggestion that we move our.
buildings 100 feet away is com-
pletely impossible within the confines of this type of precise plan.
When we recognized the amount of concern we did studies on the ad-
joining structures and we submitted an alternate possibility to the
planning staff for your consideration so that our roof line would be
at all times below the ground level of the adjoining property. (Pre-
sented chart and explained same.) Mr. Lane is planning to go along
with the street widening and widen the area in front of his home.
There being no further public testimony, the hearing was closed.
Councilman Krieger: Before the Council begins its
deliberations I would like to
make a statement. I shall refrain from participating in the Council°s
deliberations on this precise plan and abstain from any voting on the
question itself, For the record, I wish to state the reasons for this
decision. As an attorney I have prepared certain documents .for the
principals in this matter totally unrelated to any issued now before
this Council. These services were commenced long before any hearing
before the Planning Commission on this precise plan. As a Councilman
I have disqualified myself as an attorney when this issue was raised
from any representation on behalf of the applicants before any agency
of the City, the Planning Commission or the Council. It is likewise
appropriate in order to remove any issue of favoritism, partiality or
conflict that I also disqualify myself as a Councilman from voting on
any question that relates to a matter of interest to these applicants.
Councilman Heath: I think Mr. Berkman was referring to
a.remark I made when I was discussing
the zoning on this property that I felt the adjacent properties could
be protected by precise plan. On the basis of that statement, I voted
for the z®ning on this piece of property with the understanding that
good precise planning could be placed on the property that would pro-
tect the people in the neighborhood and I don't see that this precise
plan does. I feel the building on the side of the hill has had the
top chopped off it and gone into a flat roof purposely to get around
an objection the neighbors had and if this be the case I think it is
the most detrimental thing we could do to the area. I am not in
favor of creating a snow village in this area even at the sacrifice
of a few buildings. I would.question whether that street can be built
as close to Barranca as shown. I feel the street has to be moved and
if it is moved it will ruin the rest of the precise plan. With the
t
•
C, C, 1119/64 Page Nineteen
PRECISE PLAN NO, 435 - Continued
removal of those buildings on the side of the cliff and the possible
movement of that street on the east this might work out into a satis-
factory plan but the way it is right now I could not accept it whatsoever,
Councilman Jett: I undersand that this is a new
plan that has been prepared
after the Planning Commission made their decision. Is this correct?
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph: This is the plan that was
before the Planning Commission,
The plan dated October 27, 1964 which relates to the elevations was
prepared after the Planning Commission meeting,
Mr, Leon Rudderman: The Planning Commission approved
the precise plan as you now see
it on the board, With that approval we could have presented and we
still are presenting it exactly as it was then, Mr, Lane indicated he
had friends on the bluff who had spoken to him about the elevation and
in response to their desires he asked us to do a study to see what
would happen if we lowered the structures so they would not obstruct
the view of the neighbors, We did this section study and it is an
architectural section study, not an elevation, We do not have a sea
of white roofs; they are shingle treated, We didn't chop the top of
the roof off, We found we could cut further into the slope to lower
the foundation line of these structures in order to lower them below
the sight line,
Mayor Snyder: Does the plan as approved by
the Planning Commission
without revision meet all the requirements of the R-3 zoning ordinance?
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph-. Yes, The plan does conform and
it would have to be rechecked
for absolute conformity when the building plans came in,
Councilman Heath:
Did the Planning Commission know
that the roofs. of those buildings
would be 11 feet above the grade?
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph: When the public hearing commenced
no one really was aware of it.
The testimony came out -at the public hearing brought out by Mrs. Tucker
that the roof lines of the multiple family were apporently'projected
above the grade line of the home to the south. This information was
available to the Commission and there was.discussion but the information
was brought to the Commission the night of the public hearing,
Councilman Heath: Would you explain to me how or
by what means we can interpret
that elevation to be Rm3 where R-3. I believe, is restricted to two
stories?
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph: R-3 can be three stories by
right, The height is discussed
by the code and it is not necessarily the number of stories, The code
says you may not have -'in excess of three stories for a building, What
the code states in terms of -height is a measurement of height away
from a property line but in no case.exceeding three stories,
-19-
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Twenty
PRECISE PLAN NO, 435'- Continued
• Councilman Nichols: Does this conform to the code?
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph: It would haveto when the building
plans came in,
Councilman Nichols: Going on the assumption that when
the building plans did come in
that they showed something similar to what is shown there as far as the
height of the structure is concerned, then if that did happen and it
was on the slope in this fashion, at what p6int from ground reference
would you measure the height of a structure? Secondly, when you got
that height measured would it conform to the setback as shown on that
precise plan?
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph: We showed this to the Building
Departent and they have
indicated that the cross section which is now before us would conform
to the code provisions,
Councilman Nichols: My recollection of the original
testimony at the time the zoning
was granted on this property was that an engineer representing the
applicant informed the opponents of this development that there would
be no construction on the bluff at all because it was not practical.
It was also my understanding that the testimony and recommendations
of the Planning Commission at that time indicated that the Planning
Commission's concept was that there would be no development on that
bluff because this was not practical, Now in the interim after the
zoning has been granted the developer of the property has found a manner
to make it practical. I think, therefore, that we have factors that
go beyond the blacks and whites of the law itself but we come to factors
of moral obligations, moral obligations to the people who accepted
testimony on its face value, moral obligations to the Council that
made a decision based on testimony at that time, a Planning Commission
that made a decision,. It was stated by proponents that single family
residential could be built right up against multiple, I don't
believe that is true, I don't believe R-1 development could come that
close to the property line, We are in an area of town where lots are
relatively large, where people have made a substantial investment in
their homes and that investment is directly related in my opinion to
the type of view that those homes have. I believe in all sincerity
in the neighborhood where these homes exist a development if not properly
controlled will destroy property value, I think we have some need to
protect adjacent property owners. I am not an architect or an engineer
and I don't know how far down the hill those units would have to slide
in order to give a clear and unobstructed view and reasonable clearance
to the property to the rear. I could say that as a Councilman interested
in equity for the developer and the citizens I feel that those units
as shown here on this precise plan are too close to the property line
and are in a dangerous situation relative to obstructing the views of
people with prior rights, In its constituted shape neither could I
accept this precise plan.
Councilman Jett: I think this is going to be the
first departure out in this area
from single family homes. I think that homes of the people who were
there prior to this development are entitled to every consideration
for the protection of their homes and I don't want to be part of
approving something that will substantially lower that value. However,
this property is zoned R-3 and it has been zoned R-3 for some time.and
-20-
Ca CO 11/9/64 Page Twenty -One
PRECISE PLAN NO 435 Continued,
•being zoned R-3 they are entitled to develop it in accordance with the
ordinance, However, we do have the precise plan in the City and through
precise planning we,are able to obtain certain restrictions and im-
Provements we wouldn't be able to get otherwise, Some of those, I think,
the proponents have indicated they'. would be willing to do and I am
sure there is something we slipped up on when the zoning was granted
and that was to assure ourselves that Barranca Street is going to be
improved all the way through, Can we make this provision where the
original house is not a part of the development? Can we demand that.
all this area be paved?
Acting City Attorney, Mr, Terzian: It is not part of this application
and you cannot impose conditions
on that,
Mr, William Lane: Some months ago when I discussed
this with the engineer I told
him then we would develop the property across the front of my home,
Councilman Jett: I can°t go along with this
precise plan as it now exists,
Mayor Snyder: I reluctantly voted for this R-3,,
I am not going to go into why
I voted for the R-3 except to say I reluctantly voted for it, Before
you prohibit them from building anything on the bluff, and I am trying
to be fair to both sides here, you should be careful that you are
obtaining what you desire from both sides, To me the applicant has
indicated to some extent that he is not, even though he is building
on the bluff, putting roof lines up above the line of sight for
what these people really desire to look at, which is the mountains,
He may be obstructing their view of the May Company and the interchange,
I am not convinced that they are obstructing the line of sight, If
that is the case they are within the limits of the code and could build
on the bluff and it might be more attractive than leaving that bluff
bare. I would personally like to look the property over or send this
matter back to the Planning Department and Planning Commission and
let them look it over withthe view to whether the line of sight really
is obstructed and not so much with just prohibiting everything on the
bluff because I am not sure you are going to accomplish what you want
to accomplish,
Motion by Councilman Jett, seconded by Councilman Nichols, and carried,
that Precise Plan of Design No, 435 be referred to the staff to work
with the proponents to accomplish a better designed precise plan that
would be more in keeping with the area, (Councilman Krieger abstained,
Mayor Snyder voted "No",)
PLANNING COMMISSION
METES & BOUNDS NO, 135-230 LOCATION: 417 Campana Flores
Westdale Savings & Loan Assoc, between Cortez and
APPROVED Virginia,
0,93 Acres - 2 Lots - Area District III, Approved by Planning
Commission on November 4, 1964,
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten: (Read recommended conditions,)
-21-
f
0
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Twenty -Two
METES 6 BOUNDS SUBDIVISION NO, 135-230 - Continued
Councilman Heath- I have looked this property over
fairly well and I think this
solution they have proposed here is about the only solution that could
be proposed and I think it is an agreeable arrangement,
Planning Director, Mr, Joseph- Maybe there should be another
condition that the metes and
bounds be subject to the final approval of Variance No, 526,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Nichols, and
carried, that Metes and Bounds Subdivision No, 135-230 be approved
subject to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission with the
added condition that this approval be subject to the approval of
Variance No, 526 and the final map,
METES & BOUNDS NO, 135-231 LOCATION- South of Duff between
Mr, 6 Mrs, Artie Jett Glendora and Duff,
APPROVED
1,46 Acres - 4 Lots - Area
District II, Approved by Planning Commission on November 4, 1964,
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten- (Read recommended conditions,)
Councilman Jett -
I would like to disqualify
myself from voting on this,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath, and
carried, that Metes and Bounds Subdivision No, 135-231 be approved
subject to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission,
TRACT NO, 30179
Paul G, Inman
"APPROVED
LOCATION- Westerly of Charvers
Avenue between Virginia
and Cortez Street,
Request is for 15 lots, 5,9 acres - Area District III, Approved by
Planning Commission on November 4, 1964,
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten- (Read recommended conditions,)
Planning Director, Mr, Josephs Section 9220,21 of the code
states that the Planning
Commission may set certain lesser requirements due to topography,
shape of the land, or what -have -you, They have done this in this
respect, Certain of the lots are a.little shallower than the
code permits, The Commission has found fit to approve this and the
Council if they agree has to concur because the Code indicates that
the Planning Commission shall by resolution fix and they have done this
and when approved by motion of the City Council, which does not
require a resolution, it merely accepts an acceptance of the Planning
Commission resolution, then this map would be acceptable. This would
be an additional act on the part of the City Council if you agree,
-22-
C, C6. 11/9/64
TRACT N0, 30179 - Continued
Councilman Jett:
is built on the side of a cliff, Is
Page Twenty -Three
On the topographical map it
looks to me like the street
this right?
Public Services Director, Mr, Adams Grading plans would have to be
submitted
Councilman Heath. I don't see how you can get 15
lots out of it, The terrain
won't permit it, I think you have a flag lot in there and I am
opposed to flag lots, In the last case we had to take it, In this
case I don't think we have to take a flag lot. It will present a
problem in policing -- the police can't see what is going on in there,
I am sure the terrain in this property is such that those lots on the
west side of that street cannot be developed into residential lots and
still give you a pad and a driveway and place to turn around, Before
this is accepted I would like to have this gone over by our City
Engineer with a topo map from the applicant to review it,
Public Services Director, Mr, Adams: Do you want.a grading plan?
Councilman Heath, I would think so,
Mr, Paul Inman When we first gcquired this
3430 North Durphy property our first impression
E1 Monte was this was an ideal situation
for a condominium development
because it had the recreational facility of the former residence which
could be converted and restored and used to a fine advantage, In
contacting the home owners in the area we determined they were adverse
to this and we took a second consideration which was a minimum density
cluster housing development, Some people in the City were favorable
to this if the home owners were agreeable, On meetings with the home
owners in the adjacent areas we learned.they did not desire this type
of'development in the area, They felt this was a high-class residential
area where people could afford their own recreational facility and
we designed a.16-lot subdivision which we felt was more than adequate
with the hillside terrain in this area which has a variation of 35 feet
from the low point to the high point where the existing residence is
now and in communication with the Planning Department they determined
there had been some plans of 15 lots which was more desirable so when
we went before the Planning Commission.we requested 16 and they turned
it down so we presented a map with 15, which they accepted, We feel
that the contour of the property should be maintained because there
are trees that we wish to retain and it has been the feeling of the
various home owners around there they would like to see these things
retained rather than have a bare piece of land where you have cut and
fill to -build lots and it is years and years before you have any follage
of any vision or water shed value and we have designed our whole sub-
division on that basis. We feel the one flag lot here is not objectionable
because in many many hillside subdivisions they have a high percentage
of flag lots in a development of this type, This driveway has been
deemed acceptable by the Fire Department and there are other flag
lots in the vicinity that have been accepted in the past which are
maybe even less desirable than the one we have,
-23-
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Twenty -Four
TRACT NO, 30179 - Continued
• Mr, Mel Berkman: Mr, Inman has showed a wonderful
cooperation with the home owners
in the area, I think it is an outstanding degree of cooperation,
Mr, George MacCormick: I would like to reiterate that,
This is one of the few
opportunities I have had to speak for the proponents,
Councilman. Heath: With all due respect for Mr:.,
Inman, I think he is no doubt
sincere, I don't like the flag
lot,
Mr, Paul Inman: We have a turn -around on the
flag lot so.you can turn around
and come out head first rather than backing into Virginia,
Councilman Heath: I am talking about the lots on
the west side of that proposed
street that cuts through, In such a terrain I feel you have the same
exact condition that I have in the home I purchased, It looks good
on paper and I bought my home while it was on paper, but it is extremely
difficult to manuever,
Mr, Louis Fine I am associated with Mr, Inman
409 South Garden Glen on this, We have cooperated
11 West Covina. with everybody in this particular
subdivision, We have provided
a turn -around on every lot so that no one can object that possibly they
will have to back down in the street,
Councilman Krieger: It seems to me there may be a
little duplication of considera-
tion and effort and attention in this matter, The Planning Department
took these factors into consideration; considerations were imposed
by the Planning Commission consistent with the recommendations of
the Planning Department and the Engineering Department,
Motion by Councilman�Krieger seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
that Tract No, 30179 be approved subject to the conditions imposed by
the Planning Commission, (Councilman Heath voted "No",)
REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION OF NOVEMBER 4, 1964
So indicated by Mr., Flotteno
The following items were called up by Council-
(1) Variance No, 538, Richard Scott, Approved; and
(2) Variance No, 534, Walliches Music City, Approved,
RECREATION AND PARKS
None
-24-
•
I
C, C, 11/9./64
GENERAL MATTERS
'ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
HEAVY EQUIPMENT PARKING
AT CORTEZ PARK
Page Twenty -Five
Mr, Walter S. Baro I am here to ask you for an
609 Almirante Drive investigation and it wouldn't
West Covina be necessary if the secretary
of the City Manager would not
have hung up on me..when I called here or when I tried to get the City
Manager because she told me unless I informed her of the exact situation
which I wanted to discuss with the City Manager she had the order not
to let me talk.to him and she hung up on me,
My problem is the following:
I live at 609 Almirante Dirve opposite Cortez Park and I found out
that about 30 trucks and heavy material were parked within the City
parka I called Mr. Adams who was very surprised there were 30 pieces
of machinery there and he thought they would probably be staying there
for four months, I have taken some photographs, The phone call was
on October 14 and these photographs were taken on November 1 at which
time they were still there, some pieces of heavy equipment standing
there,, They were to allegedly have been used for the sewer project
on Citrus, My question is this: 'Since when is a park a depository
for heavy truck material? Here are the pictures, (Presented same
to Council,) I would like to ask the Council to ask Mr. Aiassa
maybe if his secretary permits, to investigate it and I don't like
to have a whitewash,
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: I think in due fairness to my
secretary you should hear her
side, I think Mr. Adams did give this matter fair attention,
Councilman Heath: I would like to hear the other
side because I feel our staff
is the first line of publicity for the City, If there was any incident
like this that was uncalled for, I think we should know about it, On
the other hand, if it was something other than what this man says, I
think we should know it also,,
Public Services Director, Mr, Adams: The four or five acres of the
unimproved park that are in Cortez
had been used in the past by contractors in the area as a place to
store equipment, When our sewer contractor now doing work in the area
came into the area he was looking for a place so he asked us and we
told him he could store.equipment during the time it wasn't being
used, I had a call from Dr,- Baro- and he had a strong protest against
the.use of this property for this purpose, I went down and talked,
to the contractor that same afternoon and that very day the contractor
took action to move out of the area. As far as I know he has moved out
of the area, He could still have one or two pieces of equipment left
but for all practical purposes he has moved out of the yard,
Mayor Snyder:
Dr,. Baroj, is there still
equipment there?
-25-
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Twenty -Six
'HEAVY EQUIPMENT PARKING AT CORTEZ,PARK ® Continued
Dr, Walter S, taro': At the present time the only
•
piece of equipment is a toilet
which is standing there, Mr. Adams, you talked to me on thef'14th
of October; these pictures are taken on the lst of November and the
last piece of equipment was removed last week,
Public Services Director -,Mr, Adams., I am sure it wasn't that long
ago, the 14th, butI am
positive it was within the last week we discussed this _
Dr, Walter S,.Baxo. Last week I was in Chicago so
you can't have discussed it
with me last week. I asked
for an investigation, I will gladly appear before Mr, Aiassa, the
Council; I don't think this should be heard here,
Mayor Snyder: I agree, Regarding the question
of the secretary, this is a
personnel item I would prefer we have a report in private from Mr.
Aiassa on, It is my feeling that there might have been an incident
and my own feeling is.what happened it was probably a misunderstanding
between the two of them, My,feeling is that if Mr, Adams honestly
felt this equipment was to be moved out, he thought it was taken care
of,
Councilman Jett: I think with all due respect to
Dr, Baro.'-that when a member
of the staff has been accused of something like this I think this
information should be made available in such a way that those people
who have heard the accusation also be able to hear the other side
of the story,
Mayor Snyder: There will be a report on this,
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
.JIM'S WATER WHEEL
Mr, Tom Gillum I have a petition this evening
845 East Portner with approximately 100 names on
West Covina it and I would like to present
it to the City Council, (Read
body of petition;) (Presented said petition to the Council,)
Councilman Jett: This certainly expresses my
sentiments, I would like to see
us instruct our City Attorney to draft an ordinance that would put
us in the position to stop this type of display,
• Mayor Snyder: First we might ask the City Attorney
g Y Y
whether or not there are any legal
powers in this field we hold,
Acting City Attorney, Mr, Terzian., First of all you have to have a
notice of a hearing if you-
-26-
CQ Ca 11/9/64
J.ITM'.S WATER WHEEL - Continued
Page Twenty -Seven
• propose to take testimony regarding a proposed ordinance on this
particular subject, Secondly, there is very strong doubt in my mind
that any city ordinance which is connected with things of this sort,
indecent exposure, anything remotely related to it is a valid ordinance
due to recent decisions by the State Supreme Court, Mr, Newell or
myself will undertake to do appropriate research on the matter to see
whether or not the City can validly legislate in this area, It is
my opinion right now that it cannot,
I
Councilman Jett: Where there is dancing permitted
there is liquor involved and
various other considerations here; Isn't there some way we can take
care of this? If there isn't, we had better get busy on our
State Legislature and see if we can't get some laws passed where we
can have local control,
Acting City Attorney, Mr, Terzian: There is a State statute in the.
Penal Code, Section 647,
somewhere in there., to the effect that indecent exposure is a crime
under State law, If anyone feels the crime of indecent exposure has
occured in the City of West Covina they are entitled to go the the
local office of the District Attorney or visit and advise the police
of same and do what they can do to see that a complaint against
the offending person is filed. There already is State legislation
on this subject, I think the State has pre-empted the City,
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Mayor Snyder:
to at least explore such an ordinance,
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
We tried that, The District
Attorney's Office kind of
smiled at us,
I think the course to take would
be to instruct the City Attorney
I think the Chief of Police
might like to say something
about this,
Police Chief Sill: I have prepared a report for
the Council regarding the
cabaret dance permit which now is in existence at the Water Wheel
and there is a provision under that ordinance where this license
can be revoked after a hearing and that was my suggestion, that the
Council take action this way by revoking that dancing permit,
Councilman Heath: Along what lines would this
hearing take?
Police -Chief Sill:._ There is a list of offenses
along with that, That coupled
with the case in point where the topless suits were modeled and as
soon as the Police Department became aware of this we took what action
we thought we had to take under the ordinance and then we found out that
even after a citation was issued to one of the girls involved they
continued and we went back to the District Attorney and asked for
his advise in this matter, what should we do? The information we had
was they would continue, It was his recommendation that we not
harass anyone but wait until the case was adjudicated, We have been
willing to do this but at this location,they have not felt that they
can do this and they have continued since this -time with these.
topless showsa In light of the fact of previous incidents,.the list
-27-
•
C, C, 11/9/64
'JIM'S WATER WHEEL - Continued
Page Twenty -Eight
which has been provided to you, would indicate to -you that this place
does not deserve a cabaret dancing permit, The way the ordinance is
now written it is up to the Police Department to issue the cabaret
dancing permit but the revocation is left to the Council and only after
-a notice is given and a hearing,
Mayor -:Snyder- Is there something in the law
about threatening people to
stop doing something with the threat of something else? Are we in
any danger?
Acting City Attorney, Mr, Terzian- I understand your point and no,
I don't think in this situation
what you're thinking of applies,
Councilman Krieger- I would say it doesn't apply
because we are really talking
about two matters as I understand it, We are talking about whether
there should be a revocation of a cabaret dance permit involving Jim's
Water Wheel, I assume this is being recommended to us by the Police
Department based upon the violations of ordinances as set forth in
his report, Without committing myself in any way with respect to that
question, I think it is certainlywithin our province to conduct such
a hearing, The second question seems to be whether or not, and
again without committing myself, whether or not we should determine
the feasibility or the propriety or the legality`of an ordinance in
this City banning this type of display, I think this second.question
is one we should have the benefit of the City Attorney's Office and
on that matter I suggest we refer it to him,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath, and
carried, that the matter of the cabaret dance permit issued to Jim's
Water Wheel Inn and the possible grounds for revocation thereof be
set for hearing before this Council at the first date consistent
with the code and that a notice be published to such extent and the
opportunity forhearing begiven to proponents as well as opponents
at such hearing,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath, and
carried, that the subject of the petition that has been presented to
the City Council tonight be referred to the City.Attorney with a
request for a report at the next regular meeting of the Council as
to our powers of prerogatives in that field,
Mayor Snyder- I do feel whatever public
opinion interested groups can
bring against this will bear as much weight as what we can do here,
WORKMAN AVENUE SIDEWALKS
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten- I have a communication from
Graves 8acobsohn regarding
sidewalks on Workman Avenue, You have copies_ of this letter, I would
like permission to refer this to the Department of Public Works for
report,
C, Ca 11/9/64 Page Twenty -Nine
WORKMAN AVENUE SIDEWALKS - Continued
Motion by Councilman Heath, seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
that the letter from Grace Jacobson regarding the sidewalks on Workman
Avenue be referred to the Department of Public Works for report.
CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO, 3039
The Acting City Attorney presented:
Jones .Property
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
ADOPTED
THE CITY OF WEST COVINA FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST)
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE
.ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
FOR STREET PURPOSES, MERCED AVENUE"
(Jones Property)
Councilman Heath:
For the new members of the Council.I
would like to suggest that they review
the past history of this
piece of property and the zoning given to Mr,
Jones, I feel there is
a solution to the problem here that will keep
us from going through a
costly and long drawn -out condemnation
procedure, Before we start
into condemnation I think the new members
should be made aware of
this condition and then we should decide whether
we should go into condemantion,
I feel it is possible to get the
cooperation of Mr, Jones
and I think in a very simple manner,
Mayor Snyder:
It is an accepted alignment,' If we
get the cooperation, it wouldn't
make it any cheaper,
Councilman Heath:
a long drawn -out procedure and
the meantime we antagonize Mr,
all the property in light blue
Yes, it would, If we go in for con-
demnation at the present time it is
we condemn the two small pieces, In
Jones, At some later date we will need
which will be another condemnation suit,
What Mr, Jones has been asking for and
not gotten the cooperation from the City is he has a piece of property
here which is irregular and it has been given a R-P zoning with the
exception of a small rectangular piece at the easterly end which was
zoned R-1, Actually it could be debated whether this is a good R-1 or
not, What Mr, Jones would like is to make his piece of property more
regular in shape by changing that R-1 to R-P on that small parcel.
It gives him a usable piece of property and I think he would wilfully
dedicate that right-of-way if the rest of his proberty was made so he
could use it,
Councilman Jett: I don't like to take issue with
you but my experience with Mr, Jones
has certainly been different apparently from yours because I don't think
that Mr, Jones would dedicate anything, This has been my experience,
I talked to Mr. Shaub and Mr, Shaub says he is ready to do something
with his property,
Councilman Krieger; I assume from the staff's report you
have been unsuccessful to date in
negotiating with Mr, Jones, is that true?
-29-
•
1 �
LJ
f
C, Co 11/9/64 Page Thirty
RESOLUTION N0, 3039 - Continued
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: Yes,
Councilman Krieger: My own thought is so that we
would have all the information
before us when we vote on this perhaps further exploration could be
given to this to firm up the position with Mr. Jones in this matter
so we can see what his price tag is and if we want to pay it,
Councilman Nichols: You're not indicating a concept
of trading zoning for street
improvements? I didn't want that to stand in the record -because some
might get that inference,
Councilman Krieger:
That is not what I meant at all,
I would like to know what Mr.
Jones' price is,
Councilman Nichols: Is there a possibility of
gaining improvements of a
street in this type of situation through an assessment district?
Councilman Jett: It would be difficult because
the assessed valuation -- unless
you brought in all of this you would have trouble,
Councilman Nichols:
Some of the owners have already
indicated their total willingness
to cooperate,
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: If Mr, Shaub has 50o and Jones
is less than 50o then we might
have a chance, I can tell you what Mr, Jones would like to have done,
Mr. Jones would like us to give him this property here of Mr, Skelton's
for this right-of-way and also rezone it to R-P from R-1, That is
his price,
Councilman Jett: Mr, Jones is not interested in
developing or building anything,
He is only interested in land speculation in my opinion, I am not of
the intention of doing something for somebody that isn't interested
in doing something for the City,
Councilman Nichols:
Councilman Krieger:
condemnation of doing it in two steps?
Mayor Snyder:
Councilman Krieger:
What would be the width of that
street?
What would be the advantages
assuming you went ahead with
Paying for it,
Why is the projection to-do it
in two steps?
Public Services Director, Mr, Adams: I don't think this proposes a
second condemnation, When and
if this develops he would have to dedicate the rest of the street and
put in the improvements.
-30-
0
I
a
C, Co 11/9/64
RESOLUTION NO, 3039 - Continued-,
Councilman Krieger;
Mr. Adams -
;Page 'Ilairty-One
With an indefinite future on
that street?
Yes,
Councilman Krieger, As I understand the proposal,
you want to take an 80-fobt street
as it approaches Glendora coming west and put it through on a 40-foot
basis and then it widens out again to 80 feet and this is one of our
supposedly main east -west streets. Mr. Jones presently has R-P on -
part of that property. What is the procedure to City initiate to re-
zone that to R-l?
Councilman Heath- I don't think you could get away
with R-1.
Councilman Krieger. As long as we are negotiating with
D,,Ir, Jones, I would like to explore
I. -hat possi.,oility, Is there a feasibility of initiatin- this to rezone
It R---1 from R-P?
Mr. Joseph: Vie are contemiplating, it wit'a
.Home Savings and Loan, C3 back
to --!� That is on the applicant's initiative, There are -three ways
t-Alie; code says you can rezone a piece of property. First, a property
owner -iiast give his consent and Make an application, Second, by
resolution the Planning Commission may set a public hearing for re-
zoning, Third, the City Council by resolution may set a public
hearing for rezoning.
Councilman Heath:
Mr. Terzian:
I would like to get
the City Attorney on
we stand on here,
All right.
report from
what grounds
Councilman Heath: The only reason I would suggest
holding up the resolution is to
'Lind out if we can get the balance of the street all in one procedure,
whether it be purchased or condemnation,
Councilman Jett: I wouldn't go along with purchasing
all,of that street at this time,
I am certainly in favor of this resolution as prepared to go and move
forward,
Councilman Nichols: I agree with all that has been
stated. I have a very great
reservation here. I still drive Merced every day, sometimes more t.11in
twice a day, sometimes four, five, six times a day, and I always go
Merced Avenue and I always make the dog -leg and the turn and I aim
still here. I don't find it all that bad. However, I do concur the
improvement should go through, I would like to call everyone's at-
tention to what will develop there when we come into that section
from a wide street and we see this additional barrier jutting out,
I think this will be poor community relations, People are not going
to understand all the implications of it and I think it also creates a
-31-
C, C, 11/9/64
'RESOLUTION NO, 3039 - Continued
Page Thirty -Two
•new hazard that didn't exist before, an abrupt termination of the width
of the street, I am wondering about the property involved at that
little corner there,
Public Services Director, Mr, Adams:
Mayor Snyder;
This would graduate down; the
narrowing would be gradual,
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,
Motion by Councilman Jett, seconded by Councilman Nichols, that said
resolution be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows-
Ayes- Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Mayor Snyder
Noes- Councilman Heath
Absent- None
Said resolution was given No, 3039,
Councilman Krieger- I would like a report from the
this property from R-P to R-1, staff as to grounds to rezone
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa-
RESOLUTION NO, 3040
Z. C. 324; McConnel, Melbo, et al.
ADOPTED
Mayor Snyder:
All right,
The Acting City Attorney presented-
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA DENYING
A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE"
(ZC 324, McConnel, Melbo, et al,)
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Krieger, that said
resolution be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes- None
Absent- None'
Said resolution was given No, 3040,
RESOLUTION NO, 3041
U. U. P. No. 95, Firestone
ADOPTED
Mayor Snyder:
The Acting City Attorney presented-
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
DENYING UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT
N0, 95" (Firestone)
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution,
-32-
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Thirty -Three
RESOLUTION NO, 3041 - Continued
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Heath, that said
resolution be adopted, Motion passed on roll call as follows-
Ayes: Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes- None
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No, 3041,
PARKS AND RECREATION
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa- You have a copy of the Summary
of Actions Taken by the
Recreation and Park Commission at the Regular Meeting of October 27,
1964, I would like this spread in full in the Minutes:
"1, PRECISE PLAN - DEL NORTE PARK
"Motion was made by Commissioner Whitcher, seconded by
Commissioner Veronda, that this plan be approved and sent
to the School Administration for their comments on the overlap
of the baseball field,
"Commissioner Veronda asked why it would be presented to
the school? It was stated that the baseball field would
overlap into school grounds and if the school was not in
accord with the plan it would have to be redesigned,
This should be finalized before recommending to City
Council,
"Motion carried unanimously,
"2, AMERICAN LEGION POST #790 MONUMENT
"Motion was made by Commissioner Veronda, seconded by
Commissioner Whitcher, to confirm officially the approval
for installation of the American Legion Post #790
monument in Cortez Park, as recommended by the Director,
Carried unanimously,
"3, GOLF COURSE
"Motion was made by Commissioner Veronda, seconded by
Commissioner Keith, that Mr, Gingrich meet with the
City Manager and with the Mayor to determine from him
the information he may have and the contacts he has made
and obtain from him his recommended policy and report
back to the Commission, from this date the Commission
will determine its future course of action,
"It was suggested by the Chairman that the report given
by Mr, Gingrich be presented to Mayor Snyder as an opening
for the Commission to start negotiations, Commissioner
Veronda stated that three things had to be determined
and that would be (1) information, (2) contact, and (3)
policy to follow, Commissioner Whitcher moved the motion.
Motion carried unanimously,
-33-
C, C, 11/9/64
PARKS AND RECREATION - Continued
Page Thirty -Four
"46 AMENDMENT TO MASTER STREET TREE PLAN OF CENTRAL BUSINESS
0 DISTRICT
"Motion was made by Commissioner Whitcher, seconded by
Commissioner Busching, that the Recreation and Park
Commission recommend to City Council that the Master
Street Tree Plan for the Central Business District be
amended to show Crepe Myrtle (Lagerstromia indica) trees
instead..of Carrot Wood (Cupania anacordiodes) trees on .
Center Street, Sylvan Avenue and Service Avenue, Motion
carried unanimously,"
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
BRIDLE TRAIL
Mr, Frank Cooper I am here representing the
719 Chaparro Road interest of the horsemen in
Covina our community,- Thanks to you
a very extensive and compre-
hensive study has been done of the possibility of the establishment
of permanent riding and hiking trails throughout the cities of West
Covina, Covina and Covina has been working on the same project for
us, We have one problem in particular, that is the easement or a
route to our field from Barranca Avenue south of the freeway right
adjacent to the Walnut Creek Wash going over to the Ridge Rider
field, The Hircon Development is going in there and we are not
going to be able to have an equestrian access•to our riding range,
This will curtail our program at best, if not kill it, We will have
to trailer in there and when we are instructing over 100 children
every Saturday morning there are many parents that are not going to
be able to trailer their children in, Therefore, an easement is
an absolute necessity to us even if it is an easement that will last
only for two, three, five years, but for the time being we do
desperately need some assurance of being able to gain access from
Barranca to the Ridge Rider field, I know in order to do this by
use of the maintenance road of the Flood Control requires a con-
tractural agreement between a governmental agency and the Flood
Control, Therefore, the Ridge Riders could not enter into such an
agreement, Once again I ask you to consider specifically some
sort of an easement for us primarily along the ma-intenance road
of the Flood Control.from Barranca over to the Ridge Rider field,
This they will grant if you will assume some conditions. Those are
spelled out in the report you have before you on bridle trails. One
condition is maintenance of this easement and secondly, assuming of
responsibility, It isa big thing to ask and whether or not you can
see it in your power to grant.it,.I don't know, We are scared that
we are goring to lose our field. This to many of us is a way of life
and our field is our headquarters,
We have taken another step
that we do not want to make but feel we are forced into it and
that is a lawsuit with the Hircon people on the basis that this ..
has been a common use trail for over a period of five years and
whether or not we will win in court I don®t know but we are very
desirous of dropping this suit which is holding them up. We don't
want to do this, It is a desperation move on our part and if you could
-34-
C. Co 11/9/64 Page Thirty -Five
BRIDLE TRAILS - Continued:
Mr. Frank Cooper - Continued:
• see any way out to help us with an easement we would certainly drop
this suit immediately. This suit we have entered into with the Val-
encia Heights Water Company that owns the land you lease from them
and in turn sublease to use
May I suggest that the Council
give its consideration to the usage of this property for riding and
hiking trails and some sort of an equestrian center, perhaps even
extending the scope between that three and a half acres to adjoining
parcels of land through which at this time perhaps our permanent
riding trails could be established?
Councilman Heath: About a year and a half ago
I was working on some trails
and at that time I had quite a few contracts, I wonder if I could
take this and report back at the next regular meeting on this problem?
Councilman Krieger: Perhaps we can approach this
on a number of fronts. Council-
man Heaths suggestion as well as what the City Manager has brought
up and perhaps to know what we can do to help these people. I think
this is a worthwhile activity and it ought to be continued with the
request to Councilman Heath to investigate this matter, also,
Mayor Snyder: I would suggest Mr. Heath go
through the report and see if
you can come up with further suggestions and Mr. Aiassa can give
us a report on the procuring of this easement and the liabilities
involved.
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Jett, and
carried, that the Council, direct the City Manager to explore all
facets of obtaining the aforementioned easement up to but not in-
cluding the contractural signing for.such an easement but to also
include exploration with the Ridge Riders in any area of partici-
pation on their part that may be indicated as a result of the pre-
liminary findings of the City Manager and report back to us at the
next regularly scheduled meeting.
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Jett, and
carried, that.Councilman Heath be requested to also investigate
the subject of bridle trails and give a report, to the Council at
our next meeting as to what his conclusions and recommendations
might be.
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Jett, and
carried, that the subject of possible bridle trails in Galster
Park be referred to the Parks and Recreation Commission,
-35-
C. Co 11/9/64 Page Thirty -Five (A)
PACIFIC AVENUE TRAFFIC PROBLEM REPORT
. City Manager, Mr. Aiassa- Read report from R. Ea Pontow,
City Engineer, dated November
6, 1964 regarding removal of "No Parking" Regulation on Pacific
Avenue west of Cameron between Cameron Avenue and Willow Avenue
as follows-
�7
" A petition has been received to remove the "No Parking"
regulation from from Pacific Avenue west of Cameron Avenue.
There are approximately six (6) residences fronting on this
portion of Pacific Avenue and the regulation permits free
right turns onto Cameron Avenue, southbound for traffic going
ease on Pacific Avenue.
Review of the situation on the ground indicates that addi-
tion of approximately three (3) feet of pavement on the
north side of Pacific Avenue would permit moving of the
traffic striping so as to leave a parking lane in addi-
tion to the facilities presently available. The gutter
could be maintained as at present next to the Palm trees
with this three (3) foot pavement addition. Cost of the
changes is estimated at $825.00 and they would be con-
sidered an interim improvement pending rebuilding of
the street to full standards, which is being considered
as part of next year's budget.
Upon completion the "No Parking" may be removed from in
front of all the houses except the corner one at Cameron
and Pacific where it will be retained to permit the free
right turn.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that if the City Council considers
this urgent enough to be required at this time the City
Engineer be authorized to install the changes outlined
above by following informal bid procedure. If unsuc-
cessful, we would complete the project with City forces.
/s/ R.E.Pontow, City Engineer
John Q. Adams, Public Ser, Dir."
Councilman Heath- Move to accept the report and
instruct the City Manager to
proceed with the improvements as outlined in the report,
- 35-A -
Co Co 11/9/64 Page Thirty -Six
PACIFIC AVENUE TRAFFIC PROBLEM REPORT Continued
Councilman Nichols: When a municipality finds it
necessary for the protection i
of the great majority of people to institute a procedures n this case
a restrictive parking situation, and that procedure and the restricted
parking situation specifically in this instance imposes an undue
burden upon a limited number of people, I think that from my mind I
don't look at the cost of the eight hundred dollars or whatever
it might ultimately be as being'a eight -hundred -dollar benefit to
those five or six property owners but,I think of it in my mind as
beng a general budget charge upon all the people of our community
who have gained the benefit from that service,, I think that it is
only right and proper that even when any reasonable extra cost that.
has to be born by the City that we try.to see both sides of the coin
and while gaining the benefit for the people in our community and
this would be in keeping with Dr. Snyder's concept that individual
liberties and rights should be protected even in the.face of the needs
of the great majority so I would favor Councilman;Heath's and
Councilman Jett's position,
Councilman Krieger: I don't get the analogy, at a.l.l
and I am not convinced by the
argument and I am overwhelmed by the figure and although I would like
to be able to concur in such an expenditure, 'I can't,
Councilman Jett: I feel that this is not only
to benefit just those few
residents there but I think this will substantially benefit all those
people who use that street because it is going to be widened; it is
going to be an advantage, I feel.'quite sure that I will benefit, I
use that street every once in a...while,
Councilman Heath: I would like to add to my
motion that the monies be
taken out of the Unappropriated Reserve for this project,
Action on Councilman Heath's motion: Seconded by Councilman Jett,
Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Jett, Nichols, Heaths Mayor Snyder
Noes: Councilman Krieger
Absent: None
Councilman Heath: I would like to ask the City Manager
if he would review the records.
It sticks in the back of my mind that the first month or so I came
on the Council that there was an obligation that the City has to the
Ridge Riders to maintain riding trails in or along the Wash, under
the bridges, and it might be as apart of the condition of the lease,
City Manager, Mr,, Aiassa: I will report back on -':this,
AZUSA AVENUE BRIDGE WIDENING
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: I have.met with representatives
of the Division of Highways
and I have also met with the County Raod Commissioner,, We are going
to be able to include the Azusa Avenue Bridge Widening under the
F,A,S,U,E, Project of -the Azusa- .Avenue Extension, We need authorization,
-36-
Ca C, 11/9/64
AZUS'A AVENUE BRIDGE WIDENING - Continued
Page Thirty -Seven
• a letter or action from the Council authorizing.the County Supervisors
to make formal application for F,A,S,U,E, Funds for Azusa Avenue
Bridge, It should be under the following conditions: (1) That the
City match funds needed for construction, (2) That the City will
have to acquire the necessary right-of-way, (3) That the County
will design plans and specifications for the new bridge at their
expense, There is $1,000,000 left in the F,A,S,U,E. Fund available,
We are going to transfer money from the Azusa Avenue and use regular
gas tax money and use the 186,1 funds,
Motion by Councilman Jett, seconded by Councilman Krieger, and carried,
to authorize the County Board of Supervisors to make a formal
application for F,A,S,U,E. Funds for the Azusa Avenue Bridge Widening
under the following conditions.*
(1) That the City match funds needed for construction;,
(2) That the City will have to acquire the necessary
right-of-way; and
(3) That the County will design plans and specifications
for the new bridge at their expense,
SKELTON PROPERTY APPRAISAL REPORT
City Manager, Mr, Aiassae We have an estimate of $300 plus
the cost of obtaining house
moving estimate, I would like to have an estimate not to exceed
$500 to authorize Harrisp') Baker and Associates to give us a complete
appraisal on the Skelton property,
Motion by Councilman Jett, seconded by Councilman Krieger, that the
City Manager be authorized to get an estimate not to exceed $500.00
to authorize Harrison Baker and Associates to give us a complete
appraisal on the Skelton property, Motion passed on roll call as
follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes: None
Absent: None
COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: I have a report for you. They
have certain items that we can
spend money for and others we can't because they have already made the
commitment of expense. If we were going to let the Community Youth Center
spend the money which would save a lot of profit to any of the
contractors, we would have to create a corporation, They not only
would build all the facility, they would then run the Teen -Kan -Teen
as a corporation and then we would actually only use the facility,
Mr. Sorenson went into it and he wanted to look a little more, There
are three things we can go out to bid for, the remainder of the main
wall floors, the wall...or_fence around the building, and the
furnishing of the interior facility, You are actually talking about
$139000 that we would have to go to formal bids. You can direct the
staff to prepare plans and specifications -and we can go to formal bid,
-37-
•
•
C, C, 11/9/64
TEEN-KAN-TEEN - Continued
Councilman Krieger:
whether we want to go This route?
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Page Thirty -Eight
On the 23rd will this be ready
for discussion by the Council
Yes,
Councilman Jett: What would be our position in
the event we elected to go
this course and these bills for material and labor are remaining
outstanding? Would we then be in a position to get a lien filed
against us?
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: The contract with the Community
Youth Center specifically holds us
harmless and the corporation would have to absorb that,
Councilman Jett:
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
I would be in favor of going
ahead with this,
We will bring this up on the
23rd,
Councilman Nichols: I personally loath to see us
take this course, I have
always had hoped that somehow the people could be stimulated to
participate in the completion of this project,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
that the staff be directed to prepare plans and specifications for the
floor for the youth facility, (Councilman Nichols voted "No",)
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
that the staff be directed to prepare plans and specifications for
the furnishings and the exterior wall for the youth facility,
LEGAL OPINION ON WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
WATER CONTRACT VALIDATION
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Acting City Attorney, Mr, Terzian:
SISTER CITY LETTER
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
This will come up on the 23rd,
The water contract must be
validated by December 2,
This is the first I have heard
of it. I will start on it
right away,
You have all received a copy of
this letter from the Sister
City Chairman,
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Thirty -Nine
'SI`STER CITY LETTER - Continued
Councilman Krieger: The letter as I understand it
said they haven't appointed
a By -Laws Committee yet so they cantt meet with us to discuss by-laws,
Motion by Councilman Nichols, seconded by Councilman Heath, and
carried, to accept the letter from the Sister City and place it on
filed
INTENT TO ANNEX
SAMSON DEVELOPERS INCORPORATED
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
You would like to state to them?
extention for Azusa,
Councilman Heath:
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Councilman Heath:
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Councilman Heath:
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
TRASH AND GARBAGE STUDY
This will be heard by Le A, F.'C e ,
Is there anything in particular
I assume they will give us the
This is understood,
If you can do that for us Mr,
Heath it would help us very
much,
Where does the annexation stand?
On the 25th of November it goes
to L,A,F,C.
All right,
We will hold this over,
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: I would like to have a. work.
session with the Council on
this. We came up with some very interesting items,
Mayor Snyder:
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
PERSONNEL
STATE RETIREMENT COMMITTEE
COUNCIL APPOINTEE
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Mayor Snyder:
Can we put it at the end of the
study session next Monday?
That would be fine,. We will
take it up on the 16th,
I need somebody on this Committee,
I will appoint Councilman Nichols,
-39-
•
C, Co 11/9/64
CITY MANAGER REPORTS - Continued
MUTUAL AID PROGRAM
COUNTY AGREEMENT
Page Forty
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: The League of California
Cities talked about this at their
last meeting and passed this proposal as it was presented and recom-
mended to the Board of Supervisors 'for approval;.... There were some
fire chiefs in the audience who objected to some minor technicalities
and.the League overruled them and said they would iron them out later,
STREET IMPROVEMENT
BARRANCA AND CORTEZ
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
EMPLOYEES''AWARD DINNER
APPROVAL OF FUNDS
This can be held over to the
23rd, We have the report,,
Motion by -Councilman Heath., seconded by Councilman Jett, to authorize
the expenditure of $650,,00 for the Employees' Award Dinner.,, Motion
passed. on roll call as follows, -
Ayes: Councilmen Jett,
Noes; None
Absent: None
ANTIQUE FIRE TRUCK
PARADES
Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa- It appears I can't get anybody
to ride that fire truck in
parades,, ..Would it be too much if we would pay for their lunches?
Councilman Nichols- I don't think these trips are
all that often and I think it
would be more than appropriate if the Chamber.would offer to'buy the
lunches for the people who take the truck,, I think it constitutes a
gift of public funds and the attorney should rule on it,, This is a
promotional activity,
Councilman Jett -
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
This is publicizing the City.
I will hold this off to the
23rd and, make a pass at the
Chamber,
INVITATION TO JOIN THE COMMITTEE OF MAYORS
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa- There is a bill for the
invitation to join the Committee
of Mayors, I have a report from their meeting and they discussed the
welfare experience, the courts, liquor licenses, sales tax, It is
only_$60,,00 a year,
-40-
C, Ca 11/9/64 Page Forty -One
'INVI'TATION TO JOIN THE COMMITTEE OF MAYORS Continued
Motion by Councilman Heath, seconded by Councilman Krieger, to
authorize the expen.d,iture'of $60,00 for annual dues for the Committee
of Mayors for Los Angeles County, Motion passed on roll call as
follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Jett,
Noes: None
Absents None
COVINA IRRIGATING COMPANY
STOCK SHARE
Krieger,, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: The City of West Covina has
one share of the Covina
Irrigating Company, This was given to the City for the express
purpose of getting water for irrigation, (Read report re this
matter,)
Motion by Councilman Jett, seconded by Councilman Heath,, and carried,
that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign 'the letter
regarding the�one share of stock in the, Covina Irrigating Company,
TAXI CAB ORDINANCE
City Manager, Mr,, Aiassa: You received a copy of this
report, (Read report re this
matter. It is recommended that there be a follow-up report for,,
re -inspection of these cabs after they have��jut in use, I would like
this matter.referred to the City Attorney to see if we can put some
teeth in the ordinance'
Councilman Heath: I think it was authorized
about two and a half years ago
that there be periodic inspections,
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa; Yes but we didn't have the
ordinances to do it,
CITY CLERK
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT ;APPLICATION OF
GEORGE ZACCARO FOR CHIRSTMAS TREE
LOT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
•GLENDORA AND MERCED AVENUES
Motion b Councilman Heath e'
Y , seconded by Councilman Krieger, and carried,
that the temporary use permit for George Zaccaro be approved for
Christmas tree lot at the southwest corner of Glendora and Merced
Avenues,
-41-
C., C, 11/9/64
'CITY 'CLERK -'Continued
•TEMPORARY USE PERMIT APPLICATION OF
DON KLECKNER$ DBA BIG TREE RANCH,
FOR TWO CHIRSTMAS TREE LOTS -
1) SOUTHWEST CORNER AZUSA AND
CAMERON AVENUES; 2) NORTHWEST CORNER
SUNSET AND FRAN.CISQUITO
Councilman Heath:
Page Forty -Two
This is the first time this
has gone into a residential zone,
Councilman Krieger: I would be opposed to that,
Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Nichnls, and
carried, that the request of Don Kleckner, dba Big Tree ranch
to sell Christmas trees at the location of Azusa and Cameron be
denied,
Motion by Councilman Heath, seconded by Councilman_ Krieger, and carried,
that the temporary use permit for Don Kleckner, dba Big Tree Ranch
to sell Christmas trees at the location of Sunset and Francisquito,
northwest corner, be approved,
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT APPLICATION OF
MAY COMPANY FOR SANTA CLAUS TO OCCUPY
ENTRANCEWAY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF MAY COMPANY
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten:' We have had difficulty with
May Company in the past and
that is why we have. come up with a temporary use permit on this,
They have been letting Santa Claus .use -'.Part of the entranceway on the
lower..part of that and they block off the door so we have to put
him to one sideo We will have him sit to one side of the door,
Motion by Councilman Jett, seconded by Councilman Heath, and carried,
that permission be granted to May Company for Santa Claus to occupy
entranceway at the southeast corner of May Company, location to be
to the satisfaction of the City staff,
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL P,T.A, REQUEST
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten: The'California School P,T,A,
requests approval to hold a
carnival on November 14, 1964 from 2:00.P,M, to 8:4p PM.
Motion by Councilman Heath, seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
that permission be given to the California School PoT,A, to.' -,hold
a carnival on November 14, 1964 from 2:00 P.M, to 8:00 P,M,
"VENICE" CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP
City Clerk, Mr, Flotten:
The Council has received copies
for an application for change
of.ownership for the Venice,
m42®
C, Ca 11/9/64 Page Forty -Three
"'VENhCE" CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP —Continued
• Motion by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
that no objection be voiced in the change of ownership of the "Venice",
CITY'.TREASURER
None
MAYOR'S REPORTS
None
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
CAMERON AVENUE
Councilman Heath: I understand Cameron Avenue
is posted as a 69000 pound
street, It is a secondary highway, There are many cars that run
almost that wieght and I think we should refer this to the Traffic
Committee to investigate the weight limit on that street,
Motion by Councilman Heath, seconded by Councilman Jett, and carried,
that the matter of the weight limit on Cameron.referred to the staff
to be forwarded to the Traffic Committee for report,
COUNCIL MEETING PROCEDURE
Councilman Heath: I would like to request from
you, Mr. Mayor, that during
the following meetings if you would try to stop this talking and
snide remarks that occur next to me during the entire meeting, I
am tired of hearing this little conversation all the time, the snide
remarks and characteristic remarks. I would ask you as Mayor of the
City and presiding officer to have this stopped, I don't. think it is
becoming a person who is supposed to be a professional man,
Mayor Snyder: I haven't heard them but I
think it is a matter of policy
that they should be stopped, I think in your case you both have
touchy areas and we should avoid touchy areas on both sides,
Councilman Heath: I grant that but for persons
to make snide remarks every
time I make a comment on the Council I think is unbecoming and
unnecessary,
Mayor Snyder: As'a matter of policy I agree
this should not occur,
-43-
C, C, 11/9/64 Page Forty -Four
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Continued
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
•
Councilman Heath: When the Human Relations Com-
mission was organized I
understood there was permission for the expenditure of limited funds,
I am also led to believe that there are considerable funds being
spent and I don't think they are in the budget a.nuwhere, Before these
can be spent I think they have to be a budgeted item. We have passed
some invoices tonight and I believe that there could be some expendi-
tures in there, not to belittle the services of the secretary for
this Human Relations Commission, and I don't think they were budgeted
and I don't think we are legal in approving them.
Mayor Snyder: The only other expense they
have had is a few stamps, We
should have authorization to pay the Minutes Clerk, These are the
kind of'meetings where you do require a secretary, People make
charges and you require rather accurate minutes,
Councilman Heath: It either should, be budgeted,
money set aside, or else it
has to be budgeted before it can be approved, taken out of General
Funds, I think the Council should be appraised of how much
these amounts are .coming to,
is Mayor Snyder: As far as I know there is no
further cost other than the
Minutes Clerk and stamps and stationery. Ray Windsor has spent time
with them but not a great deal, to my knowledge,
Councilman Jett:
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Is that time charged to the
Commission?
It is spread out,
Councilman Heath: I don't think there is any
amount in the budget at all
and I think the Council should be advised of how much this is running
into,
Mayor Snyder:
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Councilman Heath:
Could we have a statement on
that?
Yes,
In the Human Relations
authorization, it calls for
limited amount,
9 Mayor Snyder: We have a proposed amendment
to Resolution No, 2962 which
I believe you all have copies of. This is the resolution establishing
the Human Relations Commission and the amendment is to the effect that
the Mayor shall be an ex officio member of the Human Relations Commission
and may take part in all activities but shall have no voting privileges.
-44-
C, C, 11/9/64
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION - Continued
Page Forty -Five
. Councilman Heath: I have looked this over but
I don't think this is appropriate
for this reason: We don't do this for any other commission and I know
this is dear to your heart and something you would like to be connected
with, However, as Mayor if you sit in as an ex officio officer you
carry more weight either knowingly or unknowingly than you would imagine,
I don't think this is the place for a member of the Council, We may
have appointees to that Commission to represent the Council and I think
that the Council members should stay away from it and leave it alone,
We don't do this with other commissions and I would be adverse to do
it for this one,
Mayor Snyder: I have stated the reasons below,
It is not, as you say, dear to
my heart, I don't think it matters much one way or the other except
it would give better liaisonarnd a little more, as you say, weight to
the Commission,' I admit this would occur, I think in spite of some
of your feelings toward the Commission that the meeting the other
night was productive in clearing up a lot of misconceptions and may
have been productive in ways beneficial to everybody although you
really can't do anything when people say some of these things in
public they don't bring out the paranoid thoughts they are thinking;
they tend to bring out the facts,
Councilman Heath: I am not questioning the fact
that the Commission is doing
its job and it is, no doubt, alleviating a lot of problems in the
City, My question being I didn't think a member of the Council,
especially the Mayor, should be an officer or an appointed member of
the Commission,
Mayor Snyder: There is one other one -- the
Parks and Recreation has a
staff man to furnish them with the facts where the Commission does
not have the time to go around and assemble facts, The Planning
Commission has a paid staff. In lieu of a paid staff I felt that
the Mayor could, through his office, furnish these facts, The other
night we did furnish maps which were more accurate than could be
furnished by proponents or opponents or whatever they are in those
cases and this was one of the functions,I had in mind,
Councilman Heath: I think your' -intent is good,
Mayor Snyder: If we don't do this we have to
have a way they can at times
use the City staff to obtain facts that they cannot necessarily know
are true coming from the antagonists,
Councilman Heath: This I wouldn't object to, I
think your intent is good,
However, I think it is not very fitting, The very fact you sit
there and you are the Mayor of the City is, regardless of what you say,
speaking for the Council, I would be very much opposed to your
.being a member,
-45—
Ca Co 11/9/64 Page '-Forty—Six
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION - Continued
. Councilman Krieger: I would think there are two
points here, the necessity
for providing services to the Commission which I would agree with
you and I believe Councilman. Heath does, too, and the second is who
does provide the services and when it comes from the -office of the
Mayor it can't be divorced from your official position in the City,
k '
•
Mayor Snyder: How do we provide staff help
when they need it?
Councilman Jett: This is a question in my.mind,
I think. I ;could have to concur
in the statements of Mr, Heath. We don't have this on any of the
other commissions where we participate in any way,
Mayor Snyder:
I am not fighting for that,
Councilman Jett: I was present the other night
and I ncticed just your
presence seemed to have an aurora over the audience and every time
the Chairman mentioned something about the iHlayor the prestige of
your office along would have some effect, I don't think this was
the intent when the Commission was formed at all for the City to
take an active part in it. I understood this was to be a Commission
purely for the purpose of investigating any problems and these problems
were to be generated by some one in the community who filed a complaint,
Mayor Snyder: Do you have any objection to me,
within reason, using Mr, Windsor
to obtain the facts, like those maps that he brought-?
Councilman Nichols: The questions I would have on
.
any objection to you, Mayor, using --
this when yousay would we have
Mayor Snyder:
There are no staff men authorized
to attend these meetings,
Councilman Nichols: If 'they need clerical help or
administrative help in that
sense I think it should be provided but I would kind of go along
with Councilman Heath, I don't see where we have a direct roll
oursleves unless we feel we should do it like we do the Parks and
Recreation Commission, put that additional Commission on our schedule
of Council appointments just as observers where we go on a regular
basis like we do with the Planning Commission and the Parks and
Recreation Commission, but to treat it separately from the other
commissions I would question that. If they need help they know where
to ask for it and we have already .indicated the City'Manager's office
should provide such help as they directly request,
Councilman Heath: I feel that way, too, I don't
mean this in the manner in which
it is going to sound -- I think you have to be very conscientous in
getting this program started and so forth but I can't help but think,
and this is not a destructive criticism, but I think you are playing
too much apart in that program because when you do, as Mr. Jett
started to point out, because we do play this part regardless you
can't divorce yourself from the fact that you are Mayor and it is then
interpreted that you are speaking for the Council and when you do we
get comments coming back,
-46-
•
C, C, 1119/64 Page Forty®Seven
'HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION - Continued
Mayor Snyder:
You can't stop any Councilman
From gaming to the meeting,
Councilman Heathy
You can stop them from officiating,
though,
Mayor Snyder:
I haven't officiated, We need
administrative help, We don't
need a full-time man for this, All I
am asking is that in some way
you furnish them that administrative
help,
Councilman Heath:
I think the Chairman should be
able to go to Mr, Aiassa's
office and Mr, Aiassa should be able
to give him help, I don't think
it should come from the Mayor at all,
Councilman.Kre,ger:
Certainly staff should be able
to give us some kind of a
recommendation where e,dministrative help
is available and leave it
-simply in that manner,
Councilman Heath:
Can we leave it that they go
directly to the City Manager?
Councilman Nichols: That is the normal routine,
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa: In Item 6 of the resolution
it deals with supplies,
Mayor Snyder: Could you bring us back a
report by the next meeting
regarding the possibility of the amount of funds they might need and
whether you can furnish them with administrative help up to limits?
Councilman Nichols:
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
CITY POLICE CAR
I would favor that,
I will get that information,
Councilman Nichols.: Mr, Aiassa, we have a police car
around the streets I noticed
today and it is an all white police car,
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
ICE SKATING RINK
The only reason we are putting
this out is it is for temporary
use for 30 oi- 60� days.
Councilman Nichols: I received -a little ad sheet
from this ice skating place
and it was a commercial ad entirely.and on it it said, "Sanctioned
by the West Covina Parks and Recreation Department," It strikes me
-47,
P
C, Ce ll/9/64 Page Forty -Eight
ICE SKATING RINK - Continued
as being a little bit unusual for an absolute commercial operation
. whether giving discounts or not, I think it may mean more to people
than it really does imply and also this may be an area that is spreading
out that we•:ought to have staff look at, how much of this is going on,
is it getting out of hand,
Mayor -Snyder: They have the same things in
bowling where. they have leagues
under the Parks and Recreation, If we are affiliated with it it seems
we should have one.of our own leaders there,
Councilman Nichols -
City Manager, Mr, Aiassa:
Councilman Nichols:
This is the point,
We will have our own sheet put
I ut by the Parks and Recreation
Department,
I think that would be appropriate,
WATER. MEETING
Councilman Krieger- I have a:meeting with Mr, Jensen
tomorrow morning relating to
our meeting right after the dinner meeting with the Upper San Gabriel
el
District, at which time Council evidenced some interest
in my meeting with Mr, Jensen determining this position which we will
to tomorrow morning.
Mayor.Snyder-' That will be fine,
DEMANDS
Motion,by Councilman Krieger, seconded by Councilman Nichols, to
approve, demands,t,otalling $134950,8055 as listed on demand sheets C419
thr.ough..C.4,22, Thi's'total inoludes fund transfers of $105,410.94 and
bank transfers of $404,09., Motion 'passed on roll call as follows:
.,Ayes..; Councilmen Jett, Krieger, Nichols, Heath, Mayor Snyder
Noes: None
Absent- None
There being no.f;urther business, Motion by Councilman.Krieger, seconded
by Councilman Jett, and carried, that this meeting adjourn at 2-15 A,M,
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED
MAYOR
1M.a