02-27-1961 - Regular Meeting - MinutesMINUTES, -OF,THE, REGULAR -MEETING --OF- THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA
February 27, 1961
•-The-meeting,was called to order by Mayor Heath at 7:35 P. M. in the
.-West-, C.,ovina_.City Hall. The Pledge of Allegiance was. led by.Council-
man''Biwown with the.invocation given by Chaplain Robert L. Burton of
�'t-heInter-community 'Hospital.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Heath, Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes,
Snyder
Others Present: Mr. George Aiassa, City Manager
Mr. Robert Flotten, City Clerk
Mr. Harry C. Williams, City Attorney
Mr. Thomas Dosh, Public Services Director
Mr. Harold Joseph, Planning Director
CITY CLERK' S' REPORTS
---,PROJECT NO. C-43 LOCATION: West side of Glendora
Accept- . Street Improvements Avenue, between State Streetand
(Cooperative Project with Garvey Avenue..
Burton and Hunter - C-3
Precise Plan and Z. V. 58) To accept street improvements
APPROVED and authorize..release of ke'tna
Insurance Company Bond No.
427510 in the amount of $880.00.
Inspector's Final Report received and recommendation is to accept
the street improvements.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Towner, and
carried, that street improvements in Project No. C-43 be accepted
and authorization given for the release of Aetna Insurance Company
Bond No. 427510 in the amount of $880.00.
PROJECT NO. c-60
Accept Street Improvements
(Service qonstruction Co.)
APPROVED
LOCATION: Vincent Avenue
Extension, south of Garvey
Avenue.
To accept street improvements
and authorize the release of
Maryland Casualty Company Performance Bond in the amount of
$42,548.75, subject to Notice of Completion Procedure.
Notice of Completion has been signed by the City Manager per the
recommendation of the Public Works Director and City Engineer,
has been recorded by the County Recorder and the Inspector's Final
Report has been received.
Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, and
carried, that street improvements in Project No. C-60 be accepted
and authorization given for the release of Maryland Casualty Co.
Performance Bond in the amount of $42,548-75, subject to Notice
of Completion procedure.
C_ CI., 2,27-r61
..-PROJECT NO. C-134
Accept Street Improvements
(Boddum Construction Co.)
Page Two
LOCATION: Walnut Creek Parkway,
between Sylvan and Vincent Avenues
APPROVED To accept street improvements
and authorize the release of
• General Insurance Compan4of
America Performance Bond No. 437982 in the amount of $9,412.4
subject to Notice of Completion procedure.
Notice of Completion has been signed by the City Manager and recorded
by the County Recorder. The Inspector's Final Report has been received
and recommendation is for acceptance of improvements and release of
the bond.
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, and
carried, that street improvements in Project C-134 be accepted
and authorization given for the release of General Insurance Co.
of America Performance Bond No. 437982 in the amount of $9,412.44,
subject to Notice of Completion procedure.
UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 20 LOCATION: West side of Calif'--,
Accept Street Improvements ornia Avenue, south of Oak Park
(La Puente Cooperative Water Co.) Place.
APPROVED
To accept street improvements
(sidewalk and driveway approach)
and authorize the release of Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Bond No. 3076597 in the amount of $250-00.
The Inspector's Final Report has been received and recommendation
is to accept the improvements and release the bond. I
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, and
carried, that street improvements in Unclassified Use Permit No.
be accepted and authorization given for the release of Hartford
Accident & Indemnity Company Bond No. 3076597 in the amount of
$250-00.
PRECISE PLAN NO. 198 LOCATION-. Northwest corner of
Accept Street Improvements Vincent Avenue, north of Walnut
(Socony Mobile Oil Company) Creek Wash.
APPROVED
To accept street improvements
and release Pacific Indemnity
Company Bond No. 237959 in the amount of $6,044.00.
The Inspector's final report has been received, and the recommend-
ation is to accept the improvements and release the bond.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, and
carried, that street improvements in Precise Plan No. 198 be
accepted and authorization given for the release of Pacific
Indemnity Company Bond No. 237959 in the amount of $6,o44.00.
0
`C'. '-C. 2=27-61
'PRECISE-. PLAN NO. 229
Accept,` -Street Improvements
(-,Don Robertson)
APPROVED
Page Three
LOCATION: West side of Vincent
Avenue north of Walnut Creek
Parkway.
To accept street improvements
and authorize release of
Seaboard Surety Company Bond in the amount of $1,300-00.
Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, and
carried, that street improvements in Precise Plan No. 229 be
accepted and authorization given for the release of Seaboard
Surety Company Bond in the amount of $1,300-00.
METES AND BOUNDS SUB-
DIVISION NO. 135-154
Accept Street Improvements
(Dr. W. B. Corliss)
APPROVED
LOCATION: Northwest corner of
Merced and Sunkist Avenues.
To accept street improvements
and authorize release of
Indemnity Insurance Company
of North America Bond in the
amount of $2,000.00.
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Towner,, and
carried, that street improvements in Metes and Bounds Subdivision
No. 135-154 be accepted and authorization given for the release of
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America Bond in the amount of
$2,000.00.
TRACTS NO. 18073 & 21524
Accept Street Improvements
(Richard Millar)
APPROVED
Seaboard Surety Company Bond No.
LOCATION-, West of Barranca
Street, north of Cortez Street.
To accept street improvements
and storm drain improvements
and authorize the release of
523229 in the amount of $23,000.00.
Certificate of Completion and Inspector's final report have been
received and recommendation is to accept street improvements and
release the bond.
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and
carried, that street improvements in Tracts No. 18073 and 01524
be accepted and authorization given to release Seaboard Surety
Company Bond No. 523229 in the amount of $23,000-00.
RESOLUTION NO. 2035
Accepting a bond to guarantee
cost of improvements
(Precise Plan No. 261 -
Queen of the Valley Hospital)
ADOPTED
The City Clerk presented:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST
COVINA APPROVING A BOND TO
GUARANTEE THE COST OF CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS AND TIME OF
COMPLETION,. "
• LOCATION-. Northwest corner of Merced and Sunset Avenues.
Federal Insurance Company Bond No. 80041595 in the amount of
$26,000.00 for street improvements.
Mayor Heath:
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution.
0
CJ
C. C. 2-27-61 Page Four
RESOLUTION NO. 2035 - Continued
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, that
said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No. 2035.
RESOLUTION NO. 2036
Accepting grant deed for
street and highway purposes
(Hollenbeck Street Water Co.)
ADOPTED
The City Clerk presented:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST
COVINA ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
WRITTEN INSTRUMENT AND
DIRECTING THE RECORDATION
THEREOF."
LOCATION: Northeast corner of Hollenbeck Street and Rio Verde Drive.
To be known as Hollenbeck Street.
Mayor Heath:
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, that
said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows-.
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No. 2036.
RESOLUTION NO. 2037
Accepting a grant deed for
street and highway purposes
(West Covina Unified School
District - Eldorado School -
Z. V. Nos. .141 and 162)
ADOPTED
The City Clerk presented:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST
COVINA ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
WRITTEN INSTRUMENT AND
DIRECTING THE RECORDATION
THEREOF."
LOCATION-. Northwest corner of Azusa Avenue and Mobeck Street.
To be known as Azusa Avenue and Mobeck Street.
Mayor. -Heath: Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
.body of the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Snyder, that
said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes:, Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent:
,
. None
Said resolution was given No. 2037.
•
C. C. 2-27-61
RESOLUTION NO. 2038
Accepting a grant deed for
street and highway purposes
(West Covina Unified School
District - Administrative
Building - Z. V. 188)
ADOPTED
Page Five
The City Clerk presented;
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST
COVINA ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
WRITTEN INSTRUMENT AND
DIRECTING THE RECORDATION
THEREOF."
LOCATION.- Northeast corner of Merced and Orange Avenues.
To be known as Merced Avenue.
Mayor Heath.- Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, that
said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows-,
Ayes-.,. Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath
Noes.- None
Absent.- None
Said resolution was given No. 2038.
RESOLUTION NO. 2039
Accepting a grant deed for
street and highway purposes
(West Covina Unified School
District - Edgewood High
School - Z. V. 242)
ADOPTED
The City Clerk presented.-
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST
COVINA ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
WRITTEN INSTRUMENT AND
DIRECTING THE RECORDATION
THEREOF."
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Merced and Orange Avenues.
To be known as Trojan Way, Durness Street and Merced Avenue.
It was„stated by the City Clerk that a memorandum had been directed
to the City Manager from the Director of Public Services, dated
February 27, 1961, which stated that "in speaking with the City
Attorney on this item we have included in the resolution the stip-
ulation that the acceptance of this deed does not eliminate the
requirements that the improvements at the Well site be installed
in accordance with Precise Plan 206 and Z. V. 242, and this deed
should be filed with the County Recorder as soon as possible since
certain improvements would be done in conjunction with the Army
Engineer Corps contract which will be involved in this right of
way." It was noted to see the Suburban Water Systems written
communication as received this date (2-27-61).
The communication from the Suburban Water Systems, directed to the
City Engineer stated that "due to estate problems developed within
the Hurst family clear title has not been received and this is to
advise that cost of improvements to the Well site as submitted and
accepted by the City of West Covina as indicated in the precise
plan are in the budget for completion and it is hoped that clear
title can be obtained to the property within the next few months."
r1
U
0
C . C . 2-.277_61
-RES:OLUTION NO. 2039 - Continued
Mayor Heath:
Page Six
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, that said
resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No. 2039•
TRACT NO. 24738 & TRACT NO. 25572 LOCATION: Tract No. 24738
Accept Sewer -Facilities California Avenue and Pine
APPROVED Street - Horny Construction Co.
LOCATION: Tract No. 25572
Alwood Street and Pricedale Avenue - Names A. Delaney
Inspector's Final Report has been received and all necessary tests
and other procedures have been done in relation to.these sewer
facilities and they are in accordance with the City's standards.
The sewer facilities in Tract No. 25572 were included in the street
improvement bond which is to be released when street improvements
are accepted.
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and
carried, that sewer facilities in Tracts No. 24738 and No. 25572
be accepted.
MEEKER AVENUE PRIVATE CONTRACT
Accept Sewer Facilities
A. H. Minor
APPROVED
LOCATION: Meeker Avenue, north
of Yarnell Street
To accept sewer facilities and
release Travelers Indemnity
Company Bond No. 899654 in the
amount of $1,600.o0.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Snyder, and
carried, that sewer facilities be accepted and authorization given
to release Travelers Indemnity Company Bond No. 899654 in the amount
of $1, 600. oo.
METES AND BOUNDS
SUBDIVISION NO. 135-122
(Request of Alfred Reif)
HELD OVER FOR DISCUSSION
UNDER CITY MANAGER REPORTS
LOCATION: West side of Irwindale
Avenue, south of Rowland Avenue.
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS - City Manager Aiassa: We have a
WALNUT CREEK WASH group of twelve property owners
present that have a problem
relative to our channel im-
provements. A petition has been filed with us and we have forwarded
it to the Los Angeles Flood Control District. There is proposed
condemnation proceedings on property between Azusa and Lark Ellen
Avenues, south -of the Wash. If the.:plan is carried out, it would
C. C: 2-27-61
Page Seven
CHANNEL -IMPROVEMENTS - WALNUT CREEK WASH - Continued
City Manager Aiassa - Continued:
necessitate the demolishing of garages and swimming pools, and
other things such as devaluation of homes involved, as stated in
the petition. There are approximately twenty names on this
petition.
We met- with two of the property owners, both are present tonight.
We forwarded this matter to Mr. Salsbury,.the Chief Engineer of the
County Flood Control District.
Mr. Dosh has been working with Mr. Salsbury, and it could be a
matter of about ten feet that might be salvaged by putting up a
slight retaining wall, and this is what they are now working on.
However, an analysis must be made before we can get a full report
on this situation which will possibly be by Wednesday or Thursday.
Mayor Heath:
all right, but if it should prove
then perhaps you can work with two
mittee, to see what might be done.
to wait until we get a full report
SCHEDULED MATTERS
HEARINGS
EASTERLY ANNEXATION NO. 167
Hearing of Protests
from February 14, 1961.
Advise Council when this inform-
ation comes in. If it looks
favorable to the property owners,
an unfavorable report for them,
of the home owners, as a 'com-
However, this matter will have
from the flood control.
Hearing of Protests as required
by Resolution No. 1997 adopted
by the City Council on January
23, 1961. Hearing continued
Mayor Heath stated that this was the time and place for the contin-
uation of the hearing of protests relative to Easterly Annexation
No. 167 held over from the last regular City Council meeting of
February 14, 1961, when, at that time, we had one protest from the
Forest Lawn Cemetery Company. At that time there was considerable
discussion concerning the method of arriving at the assessed
valuation of the property, and it was held open for further dis-
cussion tonight.
Mayor Heath stated that all those desiring to present testimony
should rise and be sworn in by the City Clerk.
Mayor Heath asked if the protestants desired to present any further
testimony at this time, and it was indicated that the protestants
would rest on previous testimony presented, but would reserve the
right to rebut any testimony to be presented.
Mr. Allen Schneidermann of 1102 N. Nadia Avenue, Whittier, Calif-
ornia identified himself as Deputy County Assessor in the office
of the County Assessor of the County of Los Angeles. Mr. Schneidermann
was questioned by the City Attorney, Mr. Williams, as to his famil-
iarity with the whole area known as the Bayl(Fy Ranch lying generally
east of this City, as well as the 100 acre portion, whether he had
worked on the assessment of this area and how said assessments had
been made and amounts that had been indicated.
Page Eight
''EA"S:TERLY,: ANNEXATION -NO. 167 Continued
Mi,G.lenn.R. Watson of 433 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, identi-
f`ied himself as the attorney for three of the property owners involved
--in-the easterly annexation No. 167, and questioned Mr. Schneidermann
Sr relative to a request made for pro -ration, the difference between a
request for segregation and pro -ration, and whether the pro -ration
--had 'been done and used.
Mr. William D. Moore of 433 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, identi-
fied himself as an attorney representing the Forest Lawn Cemetery
Company, and cross-questioned Mr. Schneidermann in relation to the
matters brought out by Mr. Watson, and also on the matter of the
only access being to the 100 acres making it the most valuable piece
from the area.
Mr. Watson, formerly speaking as an attorney, was sworn in as a wit-
ness and proceeded to present testimony relative to his visit to
the County Assessors Office, work sheets and maps he had examined at
that time, and made reference to the various notations he had made
as to the various evaluations placed on the area in various sections
which he indicated on the aerial map placed upon the board.
Mr. Priest, representing Forest Lawn, voiced his objection to the
testimony as being presented by Mr. Watson concerning the facts
and figures he had examined in the County Assessors Office, in that
it was pure hearsay and would not be admissable to court, so Council
could or should not hear it. However, the protest was overruled by
the City Attorney indicating that Council should permit Mr. Watson
to proceed in that every effort, by subpoena and other ways, had
been made to get the best evidence in these matters and some ink-
lings of what is being desired to find out here had been given by
the previous witness and if what Mr. Watson states ties to that
testimony it should be heard, and that the records contain inform-
ation we want and can't obtain, and that Council can hear testimony
of what those records contain. After Mr. Watson presented his
testimony, Mr. Moore proceeded to cross -,question him regarding
various statements made, as did the City Attorney.
Mr. Priest offered the aerial photograph map as an exhibit and it
was designated by Mayor Heath that it should be known as Exhibit
►r B rr
The City Attorney submitted for the record that a subpoena had
-been served upon Mr. Schneidermann and indicated the reasons for
doing so and was questioned by Mr. Moore as whether this was
ordered to be done at a regular meeting of Council. Although
at first the answer was no, it had not been so ordered at a
regular meeting, it was later indicated by Councilman Snyder that
reference should be made to the motion as stated by the Council
at the previous meeting on this matter, and the authorization
given to staff in that motion.
At the request of Councilman Towner, Mr. Moore proceeded to sum-
marize the position of the protestants and ending with the sug-
gestion that Council discontinue annexation proceeding, in that
' a majority protest had been received, since this was the most
valuable land in the whole area.
Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and
carried, that the hearing be held open to a special meeting of the
City Council to be held on March 16, 1961, at 7:30 P.M. at the
City Hall, and that the staff be authorized to proceed in accord-
ance with'the Council's directive of obtaining such further
evidence as may be necessary.
C. C. 2-27-61 Page Nine
Mayor Heath called a recess. Council reconvened at 9-40 P. M.
• ZONE CHANGE NO. 175 LOCATION- South of proposed
AMENDED Cameron Avenue, west of Walnut
(L. Sugar) Creek Wash, north of Sawyer
APPROVED Avenue.
Approval of Request to reclassify
from Zone R-A to Zone R-3 recommended by Planning Commission Resolution
No. 1003.
Maps were presented and the City Clerk stated that the Notice of
Public Hearing had been published in the West Covina Tribune on
February 15, 1961 and that on February 15, 1961, fourteen notices
had been mailed to all persons in the area. Resolution No. 1003
of the Planning Commission was read.
Mayor Heath opened the public hearing and stated that all those
desiring to present testimony should rise and be sworn in by the
City Clerk.
IN FAVOR
Mr. L. Sugar, applicant, stated that he had nothing further to state,
but would answer any questions Council might have.
There being no further testimony presented, the hearing was declared
closed.
Councilman Towner- Isn't this area subject to
general study by the Planning
Commission as to what to do
south of Cameron, and this R-3 zoning was determined as the best
use of the property at this location?
Mr. Joseph- Yes, and there are a half dozen(
study plans to indicate the
extent of their work on this
and what'you see on the board in color is just what the Commission
felt was the most appropriate here.
Councilman Barnes -
Mr. Joseph -
Councilman Towner:
What is the depth?
Approximately 300 feet.
I question whether the Commission
considered this zoning in con-
nection with the existing
master study made by Eisner.
Mr. Joseph- This study was made previous too
any contact with Mr. Eisner. I
• have had talks with Mr. Shetz
of Mr. Eisner's office, and spoke to him of the Commissions
decision here, and although he would not commit himself, he did
not take a contrary view of this.
Councilman Brown -
If R-3 is granted here, he would -
still have to submit a precise
plan?
®
L�
C: C. 2-27-61
ZONE CHANGE NO. 175 - Continued
.Mr-. Joseph:
Page Ten
Yes, this request is gust for
zoning.
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and
carried, that Zone Change. No. 175, Amended, be approved as recom-
mended by the Planning Commission.
Councilman Snyder:
Mr. Joseph:
City Manager Aiassa:
PLANNING COMMISSION
TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT
NO. 26483
(Harold L. Lane)
APPROVED
They never considered to con-
tinue Walnut Creek Parkway west
of Sunset?
It was discussed at meetings.
Weave never had Walnut Creek
Parkway extended thus far.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of
Ardilla Avenue and Clydewood
Avenue.
1-1/2 -+ Acres - 6 Lots - Area
District I
Planning Commission recommended approval February 15, 1961.
Maps were presented and the Conditions imposed were read by the
City Clerk.
Councilman Barnes:
Mr. Joseph:
this line is established,
Councilman Towner:
Are there any buildings on
this portion marked "not a
part" ?
Yes, there is a home on there
and that is why the Commission
wanted to make sure that if
it wouldn't make this non -conforming.
wondering why Ardilla was left out?
Mr. Dosh:
I recall a statement in cond-
itions that there be improve-
ments on Clydewood and I am
They are in already.
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, and
carried, that Tentative Map of Tract No. 26483 be approved subject
to the recommendations of the Planning Commission.
REVIEW.OF PLANNING COMMISSION It was indicated by the City
ACTION OF FEBRUARY 15, 1961 Clerk that Precise'Plan No. 257
was being appealed, which was
the First Federal Savings and
Loan of Alhambra, in that although it was approved by the Planning
Commission, it is being appealed relative to Condition No. 5 with
respect to improvements on Sunset and Service Avenues.
n
L�
C. C. 2-27-61
Page Eleven
"RECREATION, AND. PARKS COMMISSION-
"BOND:.ISSUE The action taken by the,Commission
at their meeting of February 23,
1961, relative to this matter -
was as follows-, "It is the recommendation of the West Covina Recre-
ation and Park Commission that the Bond Issue be submitted to the
City Council as originally proposed in November, 1960 for their
consideration, and with the request for immediate action to be taken
due to the June 6 deadline; and their deletions, if any, to be only
on a monetary basis with respect to the total amount."
(Note-, ."monetary basis" refers to a flat amount that would be
deleted from the original $1,250,000.)
Mayor Heath: Is there any further discussion
on this particular motion
regarding the bond issue?
Councilman Towner: I think that one question was
answered by Mr. Gingrich relating
to anticipated increase of
operational cost. Estimates were made of operating cost of items
proposed when completed and in operation, and summarized it by
stating that increased operating cost can be offset by capital
outlay for additions and improvements used in recent budgets.
Operational cost will be no larger than what we are now spending
on capital improvements, and if that fact is correct, we could go
along and forget that in our considerations.
Councilman Brown: In the study session, it was
my understanding, and I
believe the Minutes would so
indicate, that nobody had anything concrete to take off the bond
issue, so it was submitted as it previously had been. They didn't
want to cut any items by monies only.
Mayor Heath: Some members of the Commission
seemed to favor dividing the
proposal into three sections.
I am interested in that aspect of it, but I see that the recommend-
ation from the Commission, to us has no consideration of that.
Councilman Brown-, There was very little discussion
on this particular phase of it,
but they did break it down
putting it in three phases, so I believe it would be indicated
as all right and I could buy it on the whole, and it was possibly
a good idea.
Mayor Heath: But the recommendation would
seem to be one lump sum.
Councilman Brown: They are talking about money
• now not as.it would appear on
the ballot.
Councilman Barnes-, I believe the matter was brought
up by me and there was a question
of whether it was legal to break
it down. Is it legal to break the bond issue down to say a, b, and c
and specify an amount for each of these parts?
.BOND."ISSUE Continued
.'Mayor heath:
• ,Mr. Williams:
if only one item passed, it could
Councilman Browne
Councilman Towner:
into three parts in that the total
would be limited.
Page Twelve
Take out swimming pools from
this and have it Item 3 on the
ballot.
Yes, it would be legal to break
it down. The voters could
approve one, two or three, and
legally proceed without the others.
The only point is you might run
into trouble where we would feel
we might have to acquire more
property.
That is one of the problems, and
there is another in that it would
be binding us in breaking it down
sum you would have expendable
Councilman Barnes: I don't think so, in that you
could put park improvements on
present park sites on A, swimming
pools could be B, and additional land acquisition could be C, and
these costs could be broken down between the three parts.
Councilman Brown: What if you pass B and not C?
What if you needed land for
swimming pools?
Councilman Barnes: In the breakdown, this should be
thought out, but in breaking
this down by improvements on
present existing park sites as A, then used as an illustration, B
would be pools and C land. You wouldn't have to do that. You could
put land acquisition as B.
Councilman Brown; It wouldn't make any difference
if they passed C.
Mayor Heath: If one particular issue passed,
it would indicate people wanted,
say, swimming pools, and if
passed, land acquisition it would indicate they wanted that particular
thing and didn't want the Parks and Recreation Department to put the
money anywhere else. This divided type of ballot would tell us what
the people would desire and then can use money for that.
Councilman Towner:
consider where the money might go.
There is merit in that, but this
program covers a period of years
and I am wondering if we should
Mayor Heath-, We originally requested the Com-
mission to furnish us with a
recommendation to review the
past bond and furnish us with recommendations of not only what they
wanted in this new bond attempt, but how they wanted it presented,
when and in order of priority. Now if the Commission is presenting
this as an answer to our original request, I would gather they desire
no changes and do not want to delete anything except possibly to cut
down on the amount of money.
0
C • C.,.,227,-61... .
`BOHB:ISSUF,- Continued
Page Thirteen
Councilman Towner: Possibly they should be informed
as to our intentions and at the
same time, I do not think we
should bind ourselves completely as to how we should spend the money
and when faced with this issue, we should possibly put it all in one
bond issue and then indicate to the people of the City what the cur-
rent plans are to spend money for items in the report, but leave the
City legally open to spend it elsewhere as it becomes better for the
Public to spend it elsewhere, relative to Parks and Recreation.
Mayor Heath: This is quite a bit of money and
includes swimming pools, and I
feel that many people who have
their own pools would not feel they would want to be burdened with
a bond issue for City pools that they wont use. If you take them
out and make it a separate issue, there is more chance of getting
the other things we need rather than lose the whole thing.
Councilman Towner: Is it necessary in presenting
such an issue to state speci-
fically what the money will be
spent for?
Mr. Williams: Not specifically. You can state
it in fairly general terms, but
you must stay within
the terms are. You do not have to state exactly what you ware eVoin
to build . g g
Councilman Towner: If you broke it down into three
parts, we would have to desig-
nate these three parts definitely
so the people would know where these monies will go, here, here and
here. Can we break it down into three parts and leave ourselves
enough leeway?
Councilman Barnes: Could you say park improvements
other than swimming pools?
Mr. Williams: If you told whoever was drawing
the bond issue up what you
desire to accomplish. primarily
say swimming pools, but if it passes you do not want to put every
cent of it exactly in swimming pools. You could have swimming
pools and other improvements in public parks.
Councilman Brown. -
specific things to do so would be
If you had three issues, you
couldn't take from one to put
on another and if you had three
misrepresentation.
Councilman Towner: Possibly, it would be better
present the bond issue as a
whole, place it on the ballot
in general terms but for public relations give the items that we
intend to use the money for. This would be giving the public the
best information we would have'on what we'think we will spend on
recreation.
to
C., C.- 2'.-2T�61
BOND ISSUE: --Continued
Councilman Barnes:
i at all, and I think this is what it
what is felt to be most important,
they want the most.
—Councilman Towner:
Page Fourteen
I think we should go on the ballot
for three different items. I'd
rather have half a pie than none
would do. The vote will be on
and the public will tell us what
Perhaps it could be broken down
into two factions rather than
three, and it would still give
some choice in the matter.
I would have these suggestions in relation to the over all program
and possibly solve cutting the total amount without indicating you
could so bind the Commission on how they spend the money.
There is indicated spray pools, or wading pools, which involves
$6,000.00, and.I am in favor of cutting that out. I feel, among
other things, that they are more of a hazard than anything else,
so that is $6,000.00 that, in my opinion, could be deleted.
I think shuffleboards, unless the slab can be used for something
additional, doesn't get sufficient use to warrant spending $3,600.00
for them.
Multi -use and equipment rooms at Palm View and Cameron Parks can be
deleted for $10,000.00, because there is going to be space included
for equipment in the major community buildings proposed in these
parks.
We can leave in the $3,000.00 item at Orange and Merced and eliminate
the $50,000.00 item community building at Orange and Merced.
These things aren't in the way of being binding on the Commission,
but a way of arriving at an alternate figure.
The senior citizens program is an excellent one, but I do not
believe that this city is now in need of such a program and such
facilities are furnished through churches and other organizations
at present. I do not believe there is sufficient population in
this category at present to warrant that expenditure. Lawn bowling,
also, is primarily a senior citizens program and there is $15,000.00
for that.
Eliminate the tennis courts, because of such use permitted at high
schools, unless this is to be considered for night use which can't
be permitted at the school.
The civic auditorium could be deleted and you end up with $155,000
on basic standards, $690,000 on improvements; additional and special
facilities, $105,000; then delete one swimming pool for $150,000 south
of the freeway, and you would have'a total bond issue of $800,000.00
instead of $1,250,000.
Mayor Heath:
If we go for lump sum, I go for
that cutting, but if we break
it down three ways, I would go
for the original full amount.
C . C..._ 2-2.7--61.. Page Fifteen
.BOrTD.:;:ISSLTE.< - . Continued
Councilman Snyder: I would go with the deletions
indicated, and we could possibly
pass the $800,000 amount and
. should do it in one lump sum, not two. We would still be getting
.a great deal of improvements over what we have now if we can pass
`'the two swimming pools, get acquisition of more land and finishing
of parks.
Mayor Heath: My first preference is leave it
as it is and divide it into two
or more sections. The other
preference would be to do it in one lump sum for $800,000.
I feel we are getting off to a bad start here because the meeting we
held was a good one and now we still seem to be in a state of con-
fusion and haven't done anything.
Councilman Towner: The only state of confusion
might be the total amount, and
if it is one bond issue or
three. If we meet those two issues there is no need to become
confused over it.
Mayor Heath: However, this answer from the
Recreation and Park Commission
is confusing to me because after
the general discussion we had I feel it is not along the lines of
the general discussion.
Councilman Brown-, I think it is right along the
lines discussed.
Councilman°Barnes: There
ei%_e three parts
indicated.
Councilman Brown: I think it was agreed they would
go along with breaking it down
into three parts and would go
along with that rather than cut the amount of money.
Councilman Snyder:
this is more likely to pass with a
item.
A'three part bond issue might
bring suspicion of trying to
put something over and I think
smaller amount and a single
Councilman Brown: I will go along with the majority
of Council on this, but I would
like to express my opinion that
I do not think the public is going to pass any bond issue. We have
tried it for seven years now and we haven't succeeded, and I do not
believe they will vote for a bond issue even if it was for $10.00,
as people are getting tired of voting taxes onto themselves. I
think no matter what the amount is, it should be one issue on the
bond ballot.
Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Snyder, and
carried unanimously that the Recreation and Park Commission be auth-
orized to proceed with a Recreation and Park Bond Issue in the amount
of-$800,000.00 with the election to be held on June 6, 1961, for the
acquisition and improvement of public parks and construction of
recreational facilities, including two swimming pools.
C . C...,.=.2-2'-1, Page Sixteen
BOHD:: ISS TE.., - Continued,
"...-Mayor Heath voted "No" in that he felt the issue should be.for the
full amount as indicated ($1,250,000) and should be broken' into
three sections so that part of it can probably be obtained'if not
possibly the whole thing. Councilman Brown stated that he agreed
we should,:.go,, for the whole thing, but he felt ,.that the whole thing
would .not .be approved and would so vote "yes" on this motion and
Councilman Barnes stated he felt the same. Councilman Snyder also
indicated he favored the motion. Mayor Heath then changed his vote
to a "yes" vote, in view of the feelings and facts as presented by
other members of Council.
TACKLE FOOTBALL PROGRAM An action taken by the Recreation
and Parks Commission at their
meeting of February 23, 1961,
relative to this matter was as follows: "Report to the City Council
that the Recreation and Parks Commission has acted on their request
for a study and method of perpetuating the tackle football program
in the City of West Covina, and hereby recommends that the area in
Cortez Park, as shown on the attached plot plan, be prepared as a
permanent field location for the West Covina Junior Football Confer-
ence, and that the City participate in an estimated amount of $300.00
with City labor and equipment for the initial development of this
site."
Councilman Brown-,
but in reconsidering it, there
is more cubic yards to be moved
cost could be met, and a better
tract rather than have it done
Councilman Snyder:
Mayor Heath-.
Councilman Snyder:
Councilman Browne
Councilman Snyder-.
At the time this was before the
Commission, I thought strongly
of doing it with City forces,
would seem to be indications there
than first indicated and I feel the
job done, b®y:letting it out to con-
with'City forces.
Where do they practice now?
Cameron Park.
Has the City ever done this for
any Little League Parks?
Yes, although not quite in this
manner, but in other ways.
I think we are over -crowding
Cortez Park. Were there any
other sites considered?
Councilman Brown-, This is all in lawn and you will
only have side marker strips.
Councilman Snyder: Yes, but it won't be lawn long.
Mr. Gingrich: This is the largest park site in
the City. We surveyed other
sites and this is at the east
end of the park. There is no other type of development here beyond
the fire ring that.is in there. This would only be used three
months out of the year for football and would be a free type play
area the remainder of the year. They will eventually have bleachers
which they would like to put on the south side of the field, which
.is not a satisfactory area for any other type of development and
these would be.permanent bleachers with possibly temporary ones on
the north side
Page Seventeen
TACKLE'. FOOTBALL , PROGRA•M,�-,-- Continued
Mr. .Gingrich (Continued): When the Teen -Kan -Teen is com-
pleted at Cameron Park, the walls
will extend onto the area they
now.play upon. There is another 80 yard field proposed at Orange -
Merced, which will also be used, since with the expansion of this
football conference, they won't be able to play on only one field.
So we.are thinking in terms of more than just one site.
Councilman Barnes-, I would go with their recommend-
ation plus having someone from
outside do the necessary work
as we do not have the proper equipment.
Councilman Snyder: I still think it is too big a
chunk of land to use out of
Cortez Park and should go in
one of the other parks.
Councilman Towner: It will give the park more use
instead of less use in this
area as now there are only a
few children who wander down
into that area.
Councilman Snyder: I am absolutely not for it in
this park. I think it is the
wrong place for it.
City Manager Aiassa-, There is no money budgeted. If
you want to expend funds they
must show where it is coming
from.
Councilman Towner: Perhaps the football conference
can go out and find a D-8 Cat.
somewhere to do this work. The
Little Leagues in the past have invested to improve their sites
themselves and I can't see why this football conference can't do
it, too. ,
Mayor Heath: I think it is an important
enterprise, and it would be
good if the football conference
would do this. However, we have contributed some money to parks
where Little League has been placed, and I think that we should
possibly contribute something here to football.
Councilman Brown-, This is a good program, and I
am in favor of spending the
money. If some item may be
waived in favor of this, it may help to defray some of the cost,
but there is a lot of equipment around the City with the work that
is going on and someone might be willing to donate the machine if
. arrangements can be made for a competent operator.
Mayor Heath: Is there any item in the
Recreation and Parks budget
they might like to switch?
City Manager Aiassa-, I would like to delay this
matter until your next meeting
so I can meet with the
Director.
C. C. 2-2:7-.61: .
Page Eighteen
...TACKLE FOOTBALL PROGRAM,- Continued
Councilman Snyder: I would like to hold this over,
too.. I am not against the use
as such, but there might be
• found a more level site somewhere else that wouldn't need to be
graded.
•
Motion by Councilman Snyder, seconded by Councilman Brown, and
carried, that the City Manager be instructed to review this matter
as to whether another site might be found that wouldn't have to be
graded, but if it is insisted this is the only site, there be found
possible ways of finding money so this matter might go ahead if
possible.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
PROTECT NO. C-95
Sunset and Francisquito Avenue
street improvements.
City Manager Aiassa:, The Thriftimart stated they
would participate doing some
street improvements so as to
protect the adjacent property owner on Sunset, and the property
owners wanted the secondary street improved instead. Present
improvements on Sunset.Avenue are not complete, even though the
back secondary service street is. The Bassett School didn't want
to put street improvements on Sunset, but will put in curbs, gutters
and sidewalks if the City would pave. This was reviewed by the
City Council.
We are talking about a pretty big project here. These people have
a problem because it is a real high area and then all of a sudden
it drops off, especially for egress and ingress. The question
facing Council is whether to continue aid, improve the frontage
service road to Bassett School site and then eventually Sunset
Avenue. at City expense, because it will be in no-man's land or
it would be a street between a street.
Councilman Brown:
Councilman Barnes. -
and houses set back so far that
Why not improve Sunset instead
of the frontage road?
Wasn't this because of the
depth of lots?' They were
so deep in this location
they put the service road in?
City Manager Aiassa: These were put in under County
plan requirement, service road
with Sunset 80 or 100 feet.
The houses were built under County standards and then the area
was annexed to the City. The development probably got these done
under County conditions, which were lower conditions than the
City's and, afterward, annexing to the City.
Councilman Towner:
City Manager.Aiassa:
ment act like the 1911 Act, etc.
What about improvement act
procedure?
That would only be for curbs
and gutters and street improve-
ments under some street improve-
C. C. 2-27-61
PROJECT NO...C-95 - Continued
Councilman Townero
Page Nineteen
Do they want to do that?
Mr. Dosh: We have no committment from them.
• Their first feelings were that a
cash deposit was difficult for
some of them to make. We tried this same thing four or five years ago
but couldn't get any interest, as it was felt the cash deposit was too
much.
Mayor Heath:
Do you people feel the majority of
the people would now go for 1911
Act improvement?
Mr. Howard Baker: We would like to see what Council
proposes --facts and figures. We
will go along with anything that
we can build a driveway to join. It is utterly impossible when it
rains one inch for us to get in or out and gravel doesn't help.
Councilman Towner: You would be willing to go to a
1911 Act on curbs and gutters on
both sides of that frontage road?'
Mr. Baker: That would leave a mud strip in
the center.
Councilman Brown: The only proper improvement to
put in at this time would be
Sunset, forget the frontage
road, then they can put driveways out to Sunset.
Councilman Barnes: It isn't their responsibility on
Sunset as a major street.
City Manager Aiassa: Let's put it this way --the only
way to force it is by 1911 Act.
Councilman Barnes: On the frontage road, not on
Sunset.
City Manager Aiassa: We can't do anything about Sun-
set or the frontage service road
because it is a finished sub-
division. Improvements acts are the only method left.
Councilman Towner: It seems appropriate to put in
curb and gutter wherever we can
and run it up and down between
Delvale and Francisquito and I think that is a good solution to the
problem.
Councilman Brown:
Put in curb and gutter at this
time and later on we can enforce
turnarounds..
City Manager Aiassa; It would give egress with improved
driveways into Sunset, but event-
ually they would have to have turn-
arounds so as not to back up into a major highway. If Council has no
objection, we might meet with these property owners and show them maps
and there might be different conclusions for the next meeting of the
City Council.
C."C. 2-27-6.1 Page Twenty
STREET. SWEEPER Councilman Towner: I read the
report on this, and it boils
down to good and bad points on
them all. I would, however, be inclined to the Wayne as we know how
—it-operates and we may be able to replace parts between them. Only
• difficulty is that it seems to stand pretty high and hits street trees.
City Manager Aiassa: It has three wheels, and I feel
that rear wheel takes a beating.
Councilman Brown: My only objection to a new
sweeper is that I do not like
running a sweeper and getting
work out for only six hours when we spend this much money.
City Manager Aiassa: If you wish, we can have two
sweepers going all the time, 7
or 8 hours a day continuously
and use the third one if one breaks down if that is consensus of
Council.
Councilman Brown: The machine operates only 12
hours when you allow time for
servicing and steam cleaning it,
which is four hours of a two 'man shift.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Towner, and
carried, that the City Manager be authorized to call for bids on a
new street sweeper.
Councilman Brown voting 4No."
Councilman Brown:
make a difference.
City Manager Aiassa:
Mobile is going to change their
whole operation and if the vac-
uum sweeper is successful it will
We can see how the entire pattern
looks after reviewing bids and
then we can decide and reject
all bids if we want to.
AMBULANCE CONTRACT EXTENSION We have had communications with
Mr. Don Means to carry this to
July 1, 1961, and the County
will go along with it. The July 1 fiscal year will work out better
than the calendar year and I believe he will have some changes to
request at that time.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, and
carried, that the ambulance contract with Mean's Ambulance Service
be extended to July 1, 1961.
MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR UPPER Motion by Councilman Barnes,
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER ASSN. seconded by Councilman Brown,
APPROVED that there be paid to the Upper
San Gabriel Valley Water Assoc -
dues in the amount of $100.00. iation the yearly membership
Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Abse'n: None
SUPPIEMENTAL:AGREEMENT-257-1 (1)
GLENDDRA.%'BRIDGE
RESOLUTION NO. 2040
• Certification to State Division
of. Highways
ADOPTED
Mayor Heath:
Page- Twenty-one
These-are,right-of-ways promised
according to-the--Statelthat we
should have in our possession
when they go to bid.
The City Manager presented:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AUTH-
ORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A
CERTIFICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA
STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS."
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the body
of the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said
resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows.
Ayes- Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent: None
Said resolution was given No. 2040.
RELOCATION OF PALM TREES 88 Trees - 1 stump
Lark Ellen Avenue, north of the
freeway.
It was the consensus, after discussion, that these trees shall be
relocated and not removed ever.
PROJECT NO. c-96
Metes and Bounds Subdivision No.
135-122 - Request of Alfred Reif
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Towner, and
carried, that this matter be held over to the next regular meeting
of Council for chance to review.
COMMUNICATION OF APPEAL Federal Savings and Loan of
Alhambra.
Re: Street improvement require-
ments along Sunset and Service Avenues.
Council indicated City policy was they should be put in by developer
as per ordinance.
COMMUNICATION FROM Re -- Availability of 20 acres for
BAUMSTEN BROTHERS a par 3 golf course and driving
TABLED AND REFERRED TO range in the City.
CITY MANAGER AND CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE
Councilman Towner questi,pned as to whether the City can lease City
owned property to permit this use, and Mr. Williams indicated it could
be done if the City owned property not being used and leased for the
time it will not be used.
C . 'C . 2=27=61
,:RESOLUTION NO. 2041'
Welcoming Richard M. Nixon
-.,-back to Southern California
ADOPTED
• Mayor Heath:
Page Twenty-two
The City Clerk presented -
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA EXPRES-
SING GREETINGS TO FORMER VICE-
PRESIDENT RICHARD M. NIXON ON HIS
RETURN TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA."
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said
resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes.- Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent.- None
Said resolution was given No. 2041.
AMERICAN LEGION WEEK
FRANCHISE BILL
City Clerk be directed to draw up a
Franchise Bill.
The mayor proclaimed the week of
March 12, 1961, as American
Legion Week.
Motion by Councilman Barnes,
seconded by Councilman Towner,
and carried, that the Mayor and
communication objecting to the
COMMERCIAL ZONING AT GLENDORA Mayor Heath stated that this area
AND SERVICE had Just recently been zoned for
commercial, but that in studying
and talking about the Glendora-
Valinda-Vincent interchange, indications showing a cutting across
this property, some of which has the commercial zone on it. There
is a buyer for this property who is going to file a precise plan for
a general use building needing 20,000 square feet and there is a pos-
sibility this cutting across some of this property might Jeopardize
the use as the large area is needed, and also there would probably
not be enough parking area because of it.
Mr. Joseph indicated that this party had been advised that the Plan-
ning Commission was going to hold public hearing on this matter.
It was the consensus that nothing could be done about this matter at
this time until recommendations and hearings are held before the
Commission relative to Valinda.
Councilman Snyder left the Chambers at 11-50 P. M.
PLACEMENT OF LIGHTS IN LITTLE Mayor Heath stated that Mr. Zoelle
• LEAGUE BASEBALL FIELD IN had questioned about putting in
CORTEZ PARK light fixtures at no cost to the
City if the City would pay for
the energy to operate them.
Councilman Brown.- This is all right if they pass
inspection of Edison Company, and
there is adequate amount of light
to play under.
C.. C. 2-27-61
Page Twenty-three
CJ
PLACEMENT OF LIGHTS IN LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL FIELD - Continued
.Councilman Towner-. And also if they can be used for
the general benefit of the public
and not just Little League.
Councilman Brown.,
Mayor Heath:
installation., and also meets
Commission.
We pay for the energy anyway, but
it should give good illumination
not just call it lighting the
field.
Evidently, then, Council would go
along with this suggestion if the
lighting is proper, there is proper
with approval of Recreation and Parks
Mr. Dosh and Mr. Joseph were excused and left the Chambers at ll-.57 P.M.
RESOLUTIONNO. 2042
Supporting Reorganization Bill
ADOPTED
The City Manager presented-.
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA SUP-
PORTING THE PROPOSED MUNICIPAL
COURT REORGANIZATION BILL."
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, that said,
resolution be adopted.. Motion passed on roll call as follows.
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Snyder
Said resolution was given No. 2042.
TREASURER'S REPORT
January., 1961
NAME CHANGE
HELD OVER FOR STUDY
LETTER FROM CITY.OF IRWINDALE
Motion by Councilman Brown,
seconded by Councilman Towner.,
and carried, that the Treasurer's
Report for January, 1961, be
accepted.
Holt Avenue to Arroyo Avenue.
Report of Planning Commission.
Re: Changing portion of Irwindale
Avenue in the City to the name
Sunset Avenue.
Objections voiced by the City
of Irwindale.
LEAGUE RESOLUTION Councilman Towner stated that he
desired approval of Council to
vote in favor of the League of
California Cities resolution supporting legislation to increase the
motor vehicle "in lieu" tax by 5%, or increase the gasoline tax one
cent (10) or increase the motor vehicle tax, or some combination of
these, for the purpose of reducing the existing street deficiencies.
It was the consensus all were in favor of the Motor Vehicle "in lieu"
tax.
C. C. 2-27-61
COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION Mayor
people
asked
County Fire Protection and indication has
on with that protection to July.
Page Twenty-four
Heath stated that those
in Annexation No. 165
they be taken off the
been that they had to go
Councilman Brown indicated they have paid until that time, so they
• will be under the protection of County and City until that time and
then will be under City protection only after that time.
CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2043 The City Attorney presented:
Furnishing of electric current "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
.ADOPTED OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA ORDERING
THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AN
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM PLANS, SPECI-
FICATIONS, ESTIMATE AND REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 14 PART 1 STREET AND HIGHWAYS
CODE STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1919 AS AMENDED FOR THE FURNISHING OF
ELECTRIC CURRENT AND FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN LIGHTING FIXTURES
AND APPLIANCE IN SAID CITY FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30.9
1962.11
Mayor Heath-,
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the body,,
of the resolution. I
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, that said
resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows-.
.Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent.
Cqgncilman Snyder
Said resolution was given No. 2043.
INTRODUCTION
Ordinance reclassifying
certain premises
The City Attorney presented-, 1,
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMENDING
THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE SO
AS TO REZONE CERTAIN PREMISES FROM
ZONE R-A POTENTIAL C-1 TO ZONE
C-2"(City Initiated - Zone
Variance No. 176)
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, and
carried, that further reading of the body of the ordinance be waived.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, and
carried, that the ordinance be introduced.
ORDINANCE NO. 692 The City Attorney presented -
Ordinance Amending West Covina "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Municipal Code to rezone OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMENDING
• (Reichard & Schneider) THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE SO
ADOPTED AS TO REZONE CERTAIN PREMISES."
Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, that
further reading of the body of the ordinance be waived.
r
LJ
C. -C. 2-27.-61
ORDINANCE NO. 692 - Continued
Page Twenty-five
Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, that said
ordinance be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Snyder
Said ordinance was given No. 692
ORDINANCE NO. 693
Ordinance amending zoning
provisions of the -West Covina
Municipal Code relating to
laundries
ADOPTED
The City Attorney presented:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMENDING
ZONING PROVISIONS OF THE WEST
COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO LAUNDRIES AND DRY CLEANING
ESTABLISHMENTS."
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried.,
that further reading of the body of the ordinance be waived.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said
ordinance be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes.- Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Snyder
Said ordinance was given No. 693.-
RESOLUTION NO. 2044
Accepting a certain written
instrument
(Sugar Construction Co.)
ADOPTED
Mayor Heath:
The City Attorney presented:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA
ACCEPTING A CERTAIN WRITTEN
INSTRUMENT AND DIRECTING THE
RECORDATION THEREOF."
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said
resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Snyder
Said resolution was given No. 2044.
RESOLUTION NO. 2045
Authorizing execution of
a grant deed
ADOPTED
Mayor Heath:
The City Attorney presented-.
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AUTH-
ORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT
DEED."
(Conveying same property from
Mr. Sugar to Mr. French as in
resolution No. 2044.)
Hearing no objections, we will
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution.
C. C. 2-27-61
RESOLUTION NO. 2045 - Continued
Page Twenty-six
Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Barnes, that
said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as
follows-o
40 Ayes-o Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Mayor Heath
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Snyder
Said resolution was given No. 2045.
RESOLUTION NO. 2046
Accepting a certain
written instrument
ADOPTED
Mayor Heath:
The City Attorney presented -
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST
COVINA ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
WRITTEN INSTRUMENT AND
DIRECTING THE RECORDATION
THEREOF."
(Harbert - Cortez Park)
Heai,ing no objections, we will'
waive further reading of the
body of the resolution.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, that
said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as
follows..
Ayes: Councilmen Brown,
Noeso None
0 Absent: Councilman Snyder
Towner, Barnes, Mayor Heath
Laid resolution was given No. 2046.
INTRODUCTION
Ordinance amending code
provision relating to
Planning Commission Compensation
The City Attorney presented. -
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST
COVINA AMENDING THE WEST
COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE.BY
THE ADDITION THERETO OF A
NEW SECTION OF THE CODE
RELATIVE TO THE COMPENSATION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION."
Notion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown., that
further-__'teading of the body of the ordinance be waived.
Notion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, that
the ordinance be introduced.
.INTRODUCTION
Ord-in'ance.amending certain code
provisions relating to garbage
and rubbish collection and fees
The City Attorney presented-.
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST
COVINA AMENDING CERTAIN
PROVISIONS OF THE WEST COVINA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
THE COLLECTION OF GARBAGE
AND RUBBISH AND THE FEES
THEREFOR."
C.. C. 2-27-61
..,ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE PROVISION
COLLECTION AND FEES -.Continued•
Page Twenty-seven
ELATING TO GARBAGE AND RUBBISH
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Towner, and
carried, that the further reading of the body of the ordinance
be waived.
Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Towner, and
..carried, that the.ordinance be_introduced.
CITY CLERK
COUNTY BOUNDARY COMMISSION Proposed Annexation No. 12 to
NOTIFICATION the City of Baldwin Park.
No objections.
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC Louis A. Delaye for'new on -sale
BEVERAGE LICENSE beer at 3032 E. Garvey Avenue.
REQUEST TO SOLICIT IN DOOR- Civil Air Patrol for expenses
TO -DOOR CAMPAIGN. and education supplies for trip
to Washington, D. C. at the
request of the Cherry Festival
Committee.
It appeared to be the consensus that some other method be found by,
this group to raise funds to finance this trip.
DEMANDS APPROVED Motion by Councilman Towner.,
seconded by Councilman Brown.,
that Demands In the amount of
$214,550.23, as shown on Demand Sheets C-248, C-249 and B-71 be
a?proved. This to include fund transfers in the amount of
$_38,394.88.
Motion passed on roll call as follows-,
I
]Ayes: CouncilmOn Brown, Towner, Barnes, Mayor Heath
,.Noes-. None
Absent.-' Councilman Snyder
There being no further business, motion by Councilman Barnes,,
seconded by Councilman Brown, that the meeting be adjourned at
126.25 A. M.
ATTEST-,
City Clerk
APPROVED 7)Le/-�
Mayor