The URL can be used to link to this page

01-23-1961 - Regular Meeting - Minutes• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA January 23, 1961 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Heath at 7:40 P.M. in the West Covina City Hall. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council- man Towner, with the invocation given by Dr. DeWitt Joseph Brady of the Congregational Church.of the Good Shepherd., ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Heath, Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder Others Present: Mr. George Aiassa, City Manager Mr. Robert Flotten, .City Clerk Mr. Harry C. Williams,.City Attorney Mr. Thomas Dosh, Public Services Director Mr. Harold Joseph, Planning Director APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 9, 1961 - Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried, that the minutes of January 9, 1961 be approved as submitted. CITY CLERK'S REPORTS TRACT NO. 25592 . Accept Street Improvements (Windsor Plaza Homes - Leslie Sugar, Pres.) APPROVED No. B-71646 in the amount of LOCATION: Northeast corner of Fairgrove and Tonopah Avenues. Accepting street improvements and sanitary sewers and author- izing the release of United Pacific Insurance Company Bond $29,050.00. Inspector's Final Report and Certificate of Completion is on file. Construction is completed and resurfaced in accordance with City standards. The Staff recommends acceptance and release of bond. Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried, that street improvements (and sanitary sewers) be accepted in Tract No. 25592 in accordance with the recommendations of the City Staff, and United Pacific Insurance Company Bond No. B-71646 in the amount of $29,050.00 be released. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 The City Clerk presented: Accepting a Grant Deed "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL (Paul A. Enders and OF THE CITY OF WEST COV.INA Margaret E. Enders) ACCEPTING A CERTAIN WRITTEN (Zone Variance No. 160) INSTRUMENT AND DIRECTING THE ADOPTED RECORDATION THEREOF." LOCATION: East side of Lark Ellen Avenue, south of Walnut Creek Wash. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Two RESOLUTION NO. 2007 - Continued For street and highway purposes to. be known as LARK ELLEN AVENUE. Bond on deposit covers all improvements. I(Part of bridge program.) • Staff recommends adoption of this resolution. Mayor Heath: Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder,. Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2007. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 Accepting a. Grant Deed Precise Plan No. 239 (Christ Lutheran Church) ADOPTED The City Clerk presented: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA ACCEPTING A CERTAIN WRITTEN INSTRUMENT AND DIRECTING THE RECORDATION THEREOF." LOCATION: West side of Citrus Street, south of the proposed Walnut Creek Wash. For street and highway purpose to be known as CITRUS STREET. Cash on deposit covers improvements. .(Part of bridge program.) Staff recommends the adoption of the resolution. Mayor Heath: Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2008. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 The City Clerk presented: Accepting Grant of Easement "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Zone Variance No. 199 OF.THE CITY OF WEST COVINA (Covina Valley Unified School ACCEPTING A CERTAIN WRITTEN District) INSTRUMENT AND DIRECTING THE • ADOPTED RECORDATION THEREOF." LOCATION: Pioneer School site, north side of Rowland Avenue, west of Azusa Avenue. For sanitary sewer purpose. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution. ri C. C. 1-23-61 RESOLUTION NO. 2009 - Continued Mayor Heath: 0 Page Three Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2009. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 The City Clerk presented: Accepting Grant -of Easement "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A111-57-3 OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA (Ruskin T. Gardner) ACCEPTING A CERTAIN WRITTEN ADOPTED INSTRUMENT AND DIRECTING THE RECORDATION THEREOF." LOCATION: In proposed Walnut Creek Parkway, west of Sylvan Avenue. For Sanitary Sewer purposes. resolution. Mayor Heath: The staff recommends adoption of Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes.: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2010. METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION No. 135-16o Extension of Time for Filing Final Map (Clyde A. Baldosser) APPROVED To: October 13, 1961. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Rowland and Vincent Avenues. Staff recommends approval. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and carried, that the request for an extension of time for the filing of Final Map of Metes and Bounds Subdivision No. 135-160, to October 13, 1961, be approved in accordance with the recommendation of the City Staff. 0 C. C. 1-23-61 CONSENT TO GRANT OF EASEMENT LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT TO THE CITY OF WEST COVINA • (A'11-59-1) Page Four The report of the Assistant City Engineer, John Lathrop, as approved by Mr. R. E. Pontow, City,Engineer, indicated that in November of 1960, the Council had accepted grant deeds over certain properties adjacent to Walnut Creek Wash for sanitary sewer purpose from property owners affected. However, the Flood Control District had certain pre- existing easements for flood control purposes over the same alignment. In August of 1960, this office petitioned the Flood Control District Offices for a Consent to Grant of Easement to utilize this land for sanitary sewer purposes. Since the easement lies.outside of the ultimate Walnut Creek Wash right-of-way, the District indicated this excess easement will ultimately revert to abutting property owners. The Plans and Specifications for the sewer construction are nearing completion, the City could not wait for the property to revert to abutting property owners, and the City, therefore, had to rely upon the District's granting of the Consent to Grant of Easement, which was unofficially assured of approval by the District and is submitted to the Council. On approval by the Council, this instrument will be recorded and final preparations for submitting the Plans and Specifi- cations to bid will proceed." RESOLUTION NO. 2011 The City Clerk presented: Accepting Consent to "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Grant of Easement OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA (A'11-59-1) ACCEPTING A CERTAIN WRITTEN ADOPTED INSTRUMENT -AND DIRECTING THE RECORDATION THEREOF." LOCATION: Merced and Willow.Avenues Sewer District. (Refer to above for report for further information.) Mayor Heath: Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2011. RESOLUTION NO. 2012 The City Attorney presented: • Approving and authorizing the "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL execution of a supplemental OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA agreement APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING ADOPTED THE EXECUTION OF A SUPPLE- MENTAL AGREEMENT." LOCATION: Walnut Creek Wash. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Five RESOLUTION NO. 2012 - Continued Between the Los Angeles County Flood Control District and the City of West Covina for the bridge betterment program. Said agreement . determines the betterment percentages for construction and design of the bridges, approaches, and side drainage improvements at the Walnut Creek Wash to be included in the Army Corps of Engineers Contract, Units 1 and 2. Mayor Heath-. Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows-. Ayes-. Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent. None Said resolution was given No. 2012. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS REQUEST FROM RUBY B. BOWKER RELATIVE TO ZONE CHANGE NO. 170 until the submission of a Precise The City Clerk presented and read a communication, dated January 19, 1961, requesting that the decision on Zone Change No. 170 be held in abeyance Plan. It was indicated by the City Clerk that the matter of the Zone Change had been before Council and referred back to the Planning Commission for further consideration and report. Councilman Snyder stated that the Planning Commission had studied this matter but held it over pending a joint study session with the Council. Councilman Brown suggested that a copy of the letter of Ruby B. Bowker be forwarded to the Planning Commission. Councilman Towner questioned as to whether there would be any time running against this particular matter. The City Attorney indicated there was not, since the applicant had requested it be held over and the only one to assert pressure as to time would be the applicant and that the matter had been scheduled for Council and held over once, so it could just continue to be postponed until the Precise Plan reaches Council. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, and carried, that a copy of the letter from Ruby B. Bowker relative to the request be forwarded to the Planning Commission. • It was indicated no action was necessary to hold the Zone Change over by the City Council since at present it was not at Council level. • • C. C. 1-23-61 CITY CLERK MONTH OF FEBRUARY DESIGNATED AS "HEART MONTH" REQUEST TO SOLICIT BY THE CITY OF HOPE APPROVED of the City of Hope to solicit PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF WEST COVINA REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page Six Mayor Heath so proclaimed the month of February as "Heart Month" as per the request made. On June 4, 1961, "Hope Sunday" Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried, that the request funds on the date indicated be approved. to obtain permission to commence The City Clerk indicated that this was a petition for an area directly north of an annexation now in process known as Annexation No. 166, and that there is more than enough signatures on the petition proceedings. Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and carried, that this matter of petition for annexation be referred to the Planning Commission for its review and report. INVITATION FROM THE WEST COVINA AUXILIARY OF POST NO. 7620 APPLICATION FROM CAMERON P.T.A. TO CONDUCT "WESTERN ROUNDUP" APPROVED To view a March of Dimes Film entitled "Bridge Between" and to be held at the V.F.W. Hall on January 30. Admission 25 cents, donations 25 cents. To be held at the Cameron Avenue School on February 23, 1961, from 3 to 4 P.M. The City Clerk indicated there was one matter involved relative to this application, which was the use of the bleachers which will involve special investigation by City Staff. Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried, that the application request of the Cameron School P.T.A. be approved subject to the necessary investigation by the City Staff. COMMUNICATION FROM MR. ALFRED REIF 445 N. Irwindale Avenue. The City Clerk indicated this matter was a problem relating to curbs and gutters and it had been referred to the City Staff who will present a report on the matter at the next regular meeting. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Seven COMMUNICATION FROM 0. L. COWEN The City Clerk presented and COMPANY OF WESTWOOD read the communication, dated January 17, 1961, which indicated that information had recently • been sought regarding certain properties in the City, and it was desired to convey to the City and to the Council the courteousness and aid given by various departments and members of the City and the appreciation for such treatment by the writers of this letter. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION OF JANUARY 18, 1961 Variance No. 337 fora non -con- forming sign as requested by the Farmers Insurance Group Holding Company at 2820 E. Garvey Boulevard was approved. Variance No. 338, to exceed height limit in R-A and Precise Plan No. 254, for the Classis of California at 130.1 S. Sunset Avenue, was approved. The Unclassified Use Permit No. 52, for the same applicant, was denied, but it is to be appealed. Councilman Brown stated that if there is to be an appeal on the Unclassified Use Permit No. 52, he would also desire that Precise Plan No. 254 hearing also be held at the Council level at the same time as the hearing on the Unclassified Use Permit. Councilman Snyder: I was supposed to present to Council the new drawings relative to the Bowker property, Zone Change No. 170, as had been considered by the Planning Commission, but I will hold it over for the joint study session. SCHEDULED MATTERS BIDS SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT LOCATION: California Avenue and A111-58-4 Crumley Avenue Sewer District. BID AWARDED TO B. J. ZARUBICA The bids were received as adver- tised at 10:00 A.M., January 19, 1961, in the office of the City Clerk and referred to the City Engineer for recommendation to the City Council at this meeting. The City Clerk stated that Notice of Publication had been received from the West Covina Tribune on December 29, 1960, and January 5, 1961, and as a news item in the Green Sheet on December 22, 1960. The recommendation is that the bid be awarded to B. J. Zarubica as the lowest responsible bidder. The bids received were as follows: Correction • B. J. ZARUBICA $107,188.93 CHUTUK CONSTRUCTION CO. 111,279.73 MAX MILOSEVICH 115,097.28 A & P PIPELINE CO. 117,377.44 FALCON CONSTRUCTION CORP. 118.7446.55 J. L. CONSTRUCTION CO. 124,461.68 ZAVAS & SONS 128,633.57 C. C. 1-23-61 Page Eight SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT A'11-58-4 - Continued EDMOND J. VADNAIS $129,066.16 $129,026.16 MARTIN KORDICK 1345218.21 134,359.21 • MIKE RAMLJAK CO. 136,928.4o 136,931.54 M.G.B. CONSTRUCTION CO. 141,791.68 141,792.01 DAKOVICH & KRAL CO. 149,049.95 CITY CONSTRUCTION CO. 155,977.96 155,976.74 L D & M CONSTRUCTION CO. 160,222.56 M.V.H. CONSTRUCTION 177,581.43 All bids contained 10% bid bonds. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and carried, that the bid for Sanitary Sewer District No. A'11-58-4 be awarded to B. J. Zarubica, as the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $107,188.93 and all other bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 Awarding a contract to improve California Avenue and other Streets (A'11-58-4) ADOPTED Mayor Heath: The City Attorney presented: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AWARDING A CONTRACT TO IMPROVE CALIFORNIA AVENUE AND OTHER STREETS IN THE CITY OF WEST COVINA IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 1964." (B. J. Zarubica) Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Barnes, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2013. HEARINGS ZONE CHANGE NO. 171 Donald Casler and Edward L. LaBerge, Jr. DENIED ify from Zone R-P to Zone C-1. LOCATION: 336,342, 344, 346 North Azusa Avenue, between Workman and Thelborn. Planning Commission recommends approval of request to reclass- Council hearing held on December 27, 1960. Hearing closed - . • decision held over to January 9, 1961. Continued from January 9, 1961, to January 23, 1961. (Refer to Planning Department report.) Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, that Zone Change No. 171 be denied. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Nine ZONE CHANGE NO. 171 - Continued Councilman Towner: I seconded the motion, but I do not think that this settles the situation of North Azusa Avenue and perhaps it prolongs the agony. But sooner or later we will have to do something with the present zoning or change it, but it is subject to the over all master plan study that will be going on. Mayor Heath: Perhaps it should be held for further study. Councilman Brown: We denied a similar request of zoning just across the street, and I do not think this should be held over and given any different treatment than across the street. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None HEARING OF PROTESTS ON Hearing of protest set for this SOUTHWESTERLY ANNEXTION NO. 166 date by Resolution No. 1995 HELD OVER TO NEXT adopted by the City Council on REGULAR MEETING December 27, 1960. Mayor Heath opened the public hearing and stated that all those desiring to present testimony should rise and be duly sworn in by the City Clerk. Mayor Heath: Mr. City Clerk, have we received any written protests? City Clerk Flotten: Just before 5 o'clock P.M. today we received a petition of pro- test with what appears to be, in checking, 128 signatures. However, I would like to indicate that about 90 or 95% appear to be husband and wife signatures, which would only represent one piece of property. We have nothing further. The petition for protest makes reference to a section of the Government code under which the petition was filed. IN OPPOSITION Mr. P. McIntosh 427 West 5th Street Los Angeles I represent those who have filed the written protest petition and in addition we have an additional eight written protests at hand at present and we will file them with the City Clerk. It is the feeling of this protesting group that the anne Rion was not initiated within the annexation area and they are strongly opposed to it if it is to remove them from County status. They do not feel that by increasing the tax rate in the area by a City property tax that being in the City of West Covina would enhance their property nor help their -property. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Ten SOUTHWESTERLY ANNEXATION NO. 166 - Continued Mr. P. McIntosh (Continued): • It is the feeling that any portion of this area that would be any importance to the City would be those few parcels of land fronting on Francisquito Avenue, and there would not be enough financial benefit to the City in that, although the City would gain 197 parcels of land,, 165 of those parcels are simple residential parcels. Of the 197 parcels outlined in this annexation No. 166, 56 are owned by the Los Angeles Trust Deed and Mortgage Exchange and these pieces of property are, at present, and were at the time of the petition, tied up in litigation in the Federal Bankruptcy Courts and there is no single owner who can sign for this property so that the actual numbers of parcels involved would be reduced to 143. We have filed a protest with 128 signatures, and it is the feeling that this wasn't incurred at their request, but done by the City to get property which would not be of actual benefit to the City. There is need for sewer and street lights, but they can get that service from the County and at less cost. These people have joined together and would submit to the City Council that they should consider the expense of calling an election when opposition seems quite organized to where it will fight this annexation right down to an election. If this would benefit these residents they might consider it, but they do feel that this annexation is unwarranted and they will fight said annexation. The City Clerk presented and read the additional protests presented, indicating this, too, referred to a section of the Government code as to reasons. The City Council indicated that although this was actually a protest hearing, they would extend the courtesy of permitting a proponent of this annexation to speak. Mr. W. Carr 1461 Tamar Road La Puente area. I believe those signatures the basis of erroneous information people in protest I would like to In the first place, this petition for annexation to West Covina was initiated by a group of people, including myself, and was not issued by anyone outside of the obtained in protest were done on received. In relation to the ask some questions. If the area is annexed to West Covina., would the mailing address change to West Covina? It is presently -listed at La Puente. Mayor Heath: Mr. Carr: Since it would become a part of the City, it would have to change to the address in that City. Would there be to the City's protection? Mayor Heath: Yes. a switch -over police and fire C. C. 1-23-61 Page Eleven SOUTHWESTERLY ANNEXATION NO. 166 - Continued Mr. Carr: At the time, relative to the people who were for this, there • were 100 signatures on the petition for annexation. This has gone on for a very long period of time in accordance with the instructions as to proper procedure received from the City of West Covina. We received no help from them whatsoever and we had a hard and fast set of rules set before us in order to properly conduct the circulation of the petition. This protest petition was circulated outside the annexation area among those who have no concern with us. We were under the impression this petition had to be circulated within the area by people living within the area and that you couldn't have people brought in from outside to circulate this petition. City Attorney Williams: An amendment was passed by the last legislation that if protests are made by petition, the petition shall contain the same information required of individual protests as made by owners of property in the proposed annexation described in the petition,..plus an affidavit that it was circulated by the proper residents of the area proposed for annexation and their address given. These things will have to be checked, they can't be ascertained tonight. Council should continue this hearing for two weeks and during the next ten days they have time to file additional protests, unless it can be ascertained at this time that a majority protest has been filed. Councilman Snyder: Is it true that if there are a certain number of parcels tied up in litigation, it would void the annexation? City Attorney Williams: land without improvements, which I Councilman Snyder: Mr. McIntosh: empowered to sign has to be done No, since it is simply a question of fact whether there is a majority protest of assessed valuation of think would have to be made a fact. I believe it was stated that certain parcels were under litigation so that persont vote wouldn't count. The number of parcels, 56, are in the process of bankruptcy litigation,, and the only people through the, court. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Snyder, and carried, that Southwesterly Annexation No. 166 be held over to the meeting of February 14, 1961, and the 'hearing be continued • to that date at 8 o'clock P. M. to permit further presentation of protests and for the City Clerk to ascertain the.amount of protest. C. C. 1-23-6l ZONE CHANGE NO. 173 George D. Reichard and Louise Lester Levine Schneider APPROVED Page Twelve LOCATION: South side of Service Avenue, between Glendora Avenue and Valinda Avenue. REQUEST: To reclassify from Zone R-A, Potential C-1 to Zone C-1. Recommended for approval by Planning Commission Resolution No. 997• City Clerk Flotten: Let the record show that proper notice has beeen received relative to the publication of Notice of Hearing in the West Covina Tribune on January 12, 1961, and that 26 notices were mailed to the proper parties in the area. Mayor Heath opened the public hearing and stated that all those desiring to present testimony should rise and be sworn in by the City Clerk. IN FAVOR Mr. P. Egley 224 W. College Street Covina the City's thinking and to now "C" zoning on the property. The property has been zoned potential C-1 for a number of years, since 1954. I agree with the Planning Commission's thinking, that there is no reason to change remove the potential and grant firm The only objection which I can possibly see, and which was voiced when it was previously before the Planning Commission, might be the re -alignment of Valinda Avenue which might restrict this piece of property. But I would say that this isn't a valid reason to hold. this up as there will be a precise plan on this property and when that comes in, if the City thinks things have changed, any change can be done in accordance with the Precise Plan. Mrs. Schneider is demised, and I represent the estate. A good many years could go by before there might be any final decision on the re -alignment and no study will change the fact that this is potential "C" zoning. I feel you should. permit the property owner his rights and if there is any question in the future as to traffic flow and re -alignment it can be done through the precise plan. The Planning Commission left off, with the consent of the applicant, the portion of proposed. R-P, and the major portion of any re -alignment would effect this rather than the "C,! portion. There has been quite a bit of activity as to the availability for sale of this property. If this can be firmed to "C" zoning, it would aid any developer that comes in to develop it, and this would be in conjunction with any re -alignment and he could draw plans accordingly. But to say you will not grant "C" zoning here because of the possibility of re -alignment is not right as any such matter can be done under the precise plan. IN OPPOSITION Mrs. E. Garries I have been here three times 636 Valinda Avenue before and while I do not see anything wrong with C-1 on Glendora, I do not see why we need C-1 on Service. There aren't many cars that go down that street, it is only two or three blocks from Glendora to Lark Ellen, and is used mostly by people who live in the area so why add stores there and bring down the value of our home property. • i C. C. 1-23-61 ZONE CHANGE NO. 173 - Continued Mr. R. Garries 636 Valinda Avenue C".1 developed before we have some Page Thirteen There is quite a lot of C-1 property in the neighborhood now that is undeveloped so why not get those that have other property that is C-1? Mr. McCassler I think they have plenty of 642 Valinda Avenue room over there for "C" zoning if they aren't running two more streets through there. They have about 7-1/2 acres there and if they put another street or two there it would effect the property owners that are there now and that have been there for years. IN REBUTTAL Mr. Egley: R-P zone. C-1 is Service and far as Valinda. I would point out that the C-1 does not affect Valinda Avenue as that is set aside for an Glendora and doesn't extend back as There being no further testimony presented, the hearing was declared closed. Councilman Snyder: Councilman Towner: Councilman Snyder: Councilman Towner: It is true that the request is C-1 with the exception of the easterly 200 feet, which was to remain R-A for now. Was that depth of 200 feet deter- mined by some City action or by the applicant when he made his application? There was potential zoning on it. It would seem, then, it was by City action. It seems to me that commercial of this size on Glendora is in keeping with the idea of contained commercial areas although it is beginning to look like another North Azusa Avenue and the problems that go with it. But I am wondering if C-1 might be contained just a little bit more. In looking at Serenade Avenue and the alley in there, I am wondering whether a double row of houses is a consideration or was considered and rejected by the Planning Commission? Councilman Snyder: Councilman Barnes: Mr. Joseph: Councilman Snyder: It wasn't considered as I recall it. Was this particular C-1, back to the potential R-P, all C-1 potential? That is correct. How long are the streets that dead-end at the south? C. C. 1-23-61 ZONE CHANGE NO. 173 - Continued Mr. Joseph: • that portion, if "C" zoning is Councilman Towner: Page Fourteen They are quite long and some- thing would have to be done when they come in for a building on granted to the north. problem of street alignment can be and I am satisfied the R-P portion reserved to some later date. I think, in general, I am in agreement with the Planning Commission recommendation. The worked out with a precise plan of it should be left out and Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and carried, that Zone Change No. 173 be approved, subject to the recommendations of the Planning Commission. UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 51 LOCATION: 1032 East Puente Avenue, and PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN between Vincent and Osborne Avenues. NO. 252 Lucian M. Vreeland REQUEST: To permit Woman's Club DENIED of West Covina Club House in Zone R-A. Denied by the Planning Commission Resolution No. 990 and request for Precise Plan of Design denied by Planning Commission Resolution No. 991. Appealed by the applicant on December 30, 1960. City Clerk Flotten: Let the record show that proper notice has been received relative to the publication of Notice of Hearing in the West Covina Tribune on January 12, 1961 and that 50 notices were mailed to the proper parties in the area. Mayor Heath opened the public hearing and stated that all those desiring to present testimony should rise and be sworn in by the City Clerk. IN FAVOR Mrs. Hazenbush The purpose of this request is 927 S. Shasta Street to allow the Woman's Club of West Covina West Covina to use the main building at this address as their clubhouse. We were organized five years ago and have been using the Cortez Park building, but during our meetings there are many solemn occasions and other operations that are interrupted and which breaks the continuity of the meetings. There are many units in the Club in which the members learn gardening, literature, arts and crafts, and at the present time • these units are meeting in the homes of individual members, but many do not have large homes to enable them to do this and so the enrollment is limited. Once a month we hold a general business meeting during the daytime, with a luncheon, and we must go outside the City for our accommod- ations. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Fifteen UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 51 AND PRECISE PLAN NO. 252 - Continued Mrs. Hazenbush - Continued: • We are handicapped by limited operations available where sections could meet in the daytime and hold their monthly business meeting. The membership',,is composed mostly of women living in West Covina and this club benefits many. We could operate more economically and this use would be of benefit to the women of the club and to the City itself. Mrs. J. G. Fitzhenry Although the Precise Plan is 215 Layton Street different than the request for unclassified use permit, it shows how the precise plan could be developed to our needs and justify the granting of the use permit. Presently there is a large house, 45 years old, at the front of this property. To the rear of the house there is a large garage con- verted to living quarters, in part. The main house is a two-story structure of 3350 square feet and the house is 45 years old. The market for such a building is rather limited as single family. The house itself might be adaptable to a two-family dwelling at some expense, but we feel this would be ideal, with slight modifications, for a club such as ours. We have an active garden section to take, as their project, the beautification and landscaping of this area with the aid of a gardener. Possibly the property would be more of an asset to the area than if it were maintained as a two-family dwelling. The Planning Commission was concerned as to the number of parking places available. During the past year our average attendance at the monthly meeting has been 100, or less, and the ladies arrive three or four in a car. We feel that the 25 parking places shown would be ample to meet the needs. The parking area has a separate entrance and exit, and it eliminates the possibility of backing out on Puente Avenue, and due to the location of the property there will not be any more traffic added,to the residential area. The property is approximately 75 feet off Vincent Avenue, which is a secondary street and faces onto Puente Avenue, which is an 80-foot street. Being located at the far north end of the City most members will travel Vincent and then turn into the property. There is a need for an occasional evening meeting and we would agree to the stipulations imposed on private clubs in the City such as the Bainbridge Club. All activity will be within the confines of the building. Activity on week days will cease at 11 P.M., with 12 midnight the deadline on Saturdays. • Any lighting in or around the building will be shielded from the surrounding houses. Although at the Planning Commission meeting, we indicated that we might desire to rent the building to -outside organizations, we would now be willing to restrict such activities by limiting it to our group, invited groups and' sponsored groups and this would permit us to supervise all activities within the building and assure ourselves that discipline will be maintained at all times and with three entrances at the front and one at the rear we could adequately satisfy the fire and safety departments. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Sixteen UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 51 AND PRECISE PLAN NO. 252 - Continued Mrs. Fitzhenry - Continued: With these stipulations, we feel our use of the building will enhance the appearance of the area and be an asset to the City. Mrs'. Plancken As you have heard by previous l610 Orange Avenue testimony, we sorely need a place of our own and that with the stipulations we are willing to accept we are interested in protecting the neighbors and in cooper- ating with them. Due to the location of the property, we feel there would be no increased traffic to the area and would be an asset to the neighbor- hood and City. IN OPPOSITION Mr. M. A. Gibson We have a signed petition of 57 1054 E. Puente Avenue signatures which we previously presented to the Planning Com- mission and we have arguments against the proposed variance. The off-street parking facilities were reviewed by the Commission and were found inadequate for the club's total membership. Any plan to increase parking would necessitate a large paved area defacing the appearance of the immediate area. If they do gardening in this area, it would take away the 28 parking places they are supposed to have. The use of the property by large groups at frequent intervals would devaluate the surrounding homes considerably, and large groups arriving and leaving these premises violate the privacy and enjoy- ment of the homes of the residents in the area, plus the noise and inconvenience to the men who have jobs that require them to retire early in,the evening and for the children of pre-school age. The Unclassified Use Permit has no regulations or restrictions governing the meetings per week or month of outside groups nor the maximum number of persons on the property, or automobiles, at any one time plus exterior lighting. We feel the residents of the area are being asked to submit to a zoning from which they would derive no benefit and actually suffer from it. The family immediately adjacent have small children that play back and forth in this area and at times they could get into the parking area and many people back up without checking where they are going and somebody could get hurt. • Mr. J. Cimono I reside east of the property 1014 E. Puente Avenue mentioned here. Parking in this area would create quite a bit of noise there at night, and we kncw from experience that people who are just walking down that driveway can be heard when they are conversing. It is my under- standing that the Commission indicated a restriction of a 6-foot wall along the property and there wouldn't be any landscaping or gardening with the required number of parking places. • C. C. 1-23-61 Page Seventeen UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 51 and PRECISE PLAN NO. 252 - Continued Mrs. Harris 648 N. Vincent Avenue the yard at the present time in the I am 15 feet away from the building, with both bedrooms facing this house, and there is occasional disturbance from early morning hours. We feel that we have enough traffic here as it is and can't stand any more noise. If there is a clubhouse, they will want to rent it for different affairs, and nobody guarantees they won't have any meetings at night. I think, too, that eleven at night during the week is too late for such a residential neighborhood and would be a disturbance. IN REBUTTAL Mrs. Hazenbush: children of our own and would be away from the area. I feel that the complaint about injury to children is far-fetched as we are safe drivers and have careful about driving into and We did state we wouldn't rent and have few night meetings. Our Junior Woman's Club group is a part of our organization, and it is necessary for them to hold their meeting at night, and that is why we requested a week -day meeting night. There being no further testimony presented, the hearing was declared closed. Councilman Snyder: Mr. Joseph: Councilman Snyder: if anyone came in with a precise require them to set back 25 feet. Mr. Joseph: Councilman Barnes: Mr. Joseph: Councilman Snyder: How far is a church required to set back from the property line? It is more than for a home adjoining R-1. At least the same, both parking and a minimum of 25 feet. The reason I asked is because I would feel that this is a place of public assembly and normally plan to build a church we would We attempt to make all uses conform to the minimum setback of residences that are there first, yes, 25 feet. Where would parking go in a case of this type? At the rear of the property. What about side of property? Mr. Joseph: It depends on the case, but we try to afford the most protection to single family homes, but if parking goes on sideyard, there is no place to go as there is a requirement for a masonry wall and a landscaping screen of a mini- mum five feet. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Eighteen UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 51 AND PRECISE PLAN NO. 252 - Continued Councilman Snyder: that close if we could avoid it. Mayor. Heath: We wouldn't consider 6-1/2 feet bordering residential uses and would never allow this to be What would be the normal sideyard clearance for a church or assembly place? Mr. Joseph: That depends on the side from which you would get the most separation between buildings and use. Where parking has to go next to property, there is a line separated by means of a wall or screening of some type. Mayor Heath: I think there is more interest in the west side of property, building 6-1/2 feet away from other building. If a new precise plan came in for a church and had church 6-1/2 feet from property line on the left, would this be acceptable according to City standards? Councilman Snyder: Or possible to screen from noise? Mr. Joseph: Where there is room as on a precise plan like this, the main building would be shifted to the westerly property line. Where property of any use is going in, we would try to move it away from the abutting residential uses which means this building would come toward the center more to maintain balance and give feeling of openness, but this building is there now and little could be said about tra t. Councilman Snyder: What is the allowable parking spaces that can meet the per square foot requirements? Mr. Joseph: Under the new ordinance, there is an off-street parking space for every 40 square feet of assembly area. There were certain suggestions by the Planning Department and if approved there would be no more than 1100 square feet of assembly area permitted even with three accesses from the building. That 1100 feet was suggested by the applicant and that would require 28 parking stalls. Councilman Snyder: How many attend the general meetings of this group? Mrs. Hazenbush: We average about 100 and some- times less. Once a month there is one regular business meeting and section meetings average anywhere from 18 to 30. • Councilman Barnes: How often are there section meetings? Mrs. Hazenbush: One section meeting once a week, six sections and one evening section and meeting once a month. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Nineteen UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 51 AND PRECISE PLAN NO. 252 - Continued Councilman Barnes: How many meetings other than these? iMrs. Hazenbush: No other meetings. The Junior part of the organization meet in the evening, one business meeting and one board meeting a month. Councilman Towner: In addition to regular groups, I understand you sponsor other groups. Mrs. Hazenbush: We go to their location or meeting places and give instructions. We are sponsoring certain activities in the highschool and youth groups and since we have no clubhouse, we go where these groups meet. Councilman Towner: If you had a clubhouse, would these groups then meet there? Mrs.. Hazenbush: We have no provisions for that a,i:a I do not know about the future if we had a clubhouse. Councilman Towner: I might comment that the West Covina Woman's Club group is a fine group and performs service to the City and they should have some place to meet. On the other hand, I think it seems clear to me that this inserts a use almost wholly incompatible with the surrounding residences and I am inclined to agree that the 57 or so people who adjoin this are entitled to be undisturbed in their homes by this type of use being inserted.in the area. The members of the Woman's Club might have the same reaction if it would go in near their homes. I am inclined to agree with what has been said in the Commission resolution and I do not think by precise plan you could meet the requirements as there isn't sufficient area to screen and to provide adequate protection to surrounding homes. Councilman Brown: I would go along with the state- ments of Councilman Towner on most of his comments. Even if it were zoned for an Unclassified Use Permit, I do not believe this precise plan could possibly satisfy and even the .revised one would lose two parking spaces to be compatible in setback with the adjacent area. Councilman Snyder: I think that it should be pointed out that the problem goes beyond just the parking . problem. It is also a matter of screening property from surrounding R-1 and that is almost impossible to do. Mayor Heath: I take rather a different stand because of the fact that there have been so many restrictions placed on this proposal by the Club itself, and which you have just heard, and would be imposed even with the Commission's recommendations, and I think the troubles would'be remedied. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Twenty UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT NO. 51 and PRECISE PLAN NO. 252 - Continued Mayor Heath - Continued: So far as the parking space is concerned, specifications are for twenty-eight by the Commission, and if you divide 48 into 100, you come up with 27-1/2, and they show 25 parking spaces and also they ..__ show some garages and I imagine the use of the garages and the 25 spaces mentioned would adequately meet parking stipulations. As far as screening is concerned, I think it could be done with shrubbery and it could act as a sound deadener. Since all activity is confined in the building and under supervision, I do not see where you will get any dance bands or other such things in a teen-age program. I feel the group is a good organization and they need a place to meet. If there is anyway at all to work a compromise so they can use this property, I would like.to see it done. I think they have stated in testimony that they would do anything to protect the neighbors and if they are sincere, I think it can be done and be satisfactory to the neighbors. Councilman Barnes: do for the City. However. I am bors who signed this petition. I went over to this area this owners for awhile, and looked On the revised plan I am sure as that is out in the parking They would need these garages the rear building, which were I am in full sympathy with the Woman's Club and there is no question of the fine work they also in sympathy with the 58 neigh - evening about 5:30 and talked with the property over very thoroughly. you would not use spaces 17 and 18, space where you turn into the garage. because of the three apartments in obtained by variance some time ago. I do not feel there is sufficient or proper setback in the parking area to the front because in requiring 25 feet I do notthirk even on the revised plan there is 25 feet of setback where you have to start with parking. The side area is entirely too close to the neighbors. Although I would like the Club to locate in a nice location, I do not think a residential area of this type is the place to have this group. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, that Unclassified Use Permit No. 51 and Precise Plan of Design No. 252 be denied, upholding the decision of the Planning Commission. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilman Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder Noes: Mayor Heath Absent: None Mayon Heath called a recess. Council reconvened at 9:30 P.M. • C. C. 1-23-61 Page Twenty-one PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 45 To amend the West Covina Municipal City Initiated Code regarding zone classification APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED on location of dry cleaning and BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION laundry facilities. Planning Commission recommended approval. Mayor Heath opened the public hearing and stated that all those desiring to present testimony should rise and be sworn in by the City Clerk. There being no testimony presented, the hearing was declared closed. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and carried, that Proposed Amendment No. 45 be approved as recommended by the Planning Commission. ZONE VARIANCE NO. 336 South Hills Little League APPROVED LOCATION: 512 S. Valinda Avenue, between Walnut Creek Wash and Service Avenue. Planning Commission recommended approval of Little League Ball Park in Zone R-A. Planning Commission decision appealed by Roy J. Hermes on December 30, 1960. City Clerk Flotten: Let the record show that proper notice has been received relative to the publication of Notice of Hearing in the West Covina Tribune on January 12, 1961, with 56 notices mailed to the proper parties in the area. Mayor Heath opened the public hearing and stated that all those desiring to present testimony should rise and be sworn in by the City Clerk. The City Clerk stated there were two written communications received in favor of this request. One was from the Immanuel First Lutheran Church and School, signed by the Board of Directors of the Board of Assembly and one from the Little League Baseball, Incorporated, of Williamsport, Pennsylvania. The City Attorney ruled that this appeal, in effect, sets aside the decision of the Planning Commission and since it is a new hearing the procedure followed is the same as at the Planning Commission in that the proponents of this request speak first with the opposition speaking second. TN FAVOR Mr. Roy F. Ames 524 S. Astell Avenue West Covina with the various conditions placed Mr. Ames presented testimony which, in essence, reviewed the decision of approval of the Planning Commission and the League's willingness to comply upon this use. Further statements went into the history of Little League in general, and Little League growth in particular, in the City of West Covina and its good effect on the children desiring to enter into this sport. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Twenty-two ZONE VARIANCE NO. 336 - Continued Mr. Roy F. Ames - Continued: It was indicated that the Immanuel First Lutheran Church had been contacted relative to this use on their property and agreements and conditions were established regarding permission to develop the ballpark and make it available for joint use. However, before granting permission, it was ascertained that none of the neighbors would object and every resident contacted in the adjacent area, including the opponent, and oral approval from them was obtained, and those who did not know of Little League activities were invited to attend other parks in the City and an offer for tour of inspection. There was further dissertation on the work that then proceeded when there was no apparent objection and the cost which was over $2500.00 in construction and $3,000.00 in materials and equipment donated by businessmen within and outside of the City giving a total of over $5,000.00. It was indicated that scheduled games began early in June of last year and lasted to August, including West Covina Youth Baseball Council Championship playoffs, and that during the week -day the games began at 5:30 P.M. and ended at 8:00 P.M. and by 8:30 the concession stand was closed and clean-up crew gone. On Saturdays and holidays the games began about 10:30 A.M. and concluded even earlier than week -day games, with none played on.Sundays which were reserved for church recreation. Before mid -season, the opponent complained about the noise and church and league officials were contacted and meetings held with every reasonable effort.made to appease the complaining party. It was stated several times by the complaintant that he was satisfied with the efforts made and would contact the League if there were further complaints, but instead he went to the City Hall. It was then a research was made and determined that the R-A zoning for church and church school was made and determined that the R-A zoning for church and church school recreation did not include the Little League activities and it was advised to apply for variance by the League. The season was permitted to finish and P. A. system speakers were directed away from the residences and reduced in volume out -put to a minimum. It was indicated trees were planted beyond the outfield fence but late in the season and they did not do well. Posted signs were placed at the entrances restricting the use of the field to boys under 12 and to activities only under supervision of adults of the church or League. It still attracted older boys although effective to a degree. It was indicated that it was felt that the situation could and would continue whether or not the ball park was there and the opponent has agreed that it was mostly the unauthorized "Tom Sawyers" who disturbed him the most and occasionally hit a ball over the wall into his yard. Danger to his child was acknowledged and with it the offer to con- struct a high fence or protective screen to provide safety, but it was opposed because of unsightliness although it was felt that a demountable screen would answer the problem. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Twenty-three ZONE VARIANCE NO. 336 - Continued Mr. Roy F. Ames - Continued: Further indications in the testimony was the close of the season and books balanced within a few dollars which left no money for further improvements, however, or installation of safety features and would have to be accomplished in the coming season. Variance was then filed for and after the decision of the Commission to approve it was found that the opponent had appealed the decision but that in meeting with him it was obvious that no satisfactory arrangement could be arrived at with the opponent and it would have to be decided one way or the other. Further contact was made with the surrounding neighbors and there was little objection by anyone, and two families, previously opposed, permitted the use of their names as no longer opposed. Reference was made to a map showing those who approved this use and signed petitions to that effect, or those no longer opposing, and to crosses which represented parties unable to be contacted and the white representing opposition from families. The testimony finished relative to the rights of citizens and the helping to build the character of future citizens and enjoying a great American sport of baseball. The Rev. Tensmeyer There is little I can add on Pastor of Immanuel Lutheran the subject as it was an able Church presentation made by Mr. Ames. However, at this tim I want to assure the Mayor and the,Council and the people of the Little League that our congregation stands ready to cooperate to the best of our ability to maintain this field and maintain it in proper order. We will cooperate to the best of our ability in prohibiting the field from becoming a nuisance. If there is anything that can be done at all in order to protect our neighbors, and the church desires to protect the neighbors and maintain peace in the neighborhood, we will do everyting we can possibly do. We are in favor of this because we believe it is a service to the community, besides the other services we are rendering as character building and religious organization. A petition was presented to the City Clerk by Mr. Ames, and read by the City Clerk, which contained 58 signatures for approval of this request. IN OPPOSITION Mrs. R. J. Hermes 503 Gaybar Street Item 2, raising the now property line to 6 feet from our back yard and ball park. It would be that is five years old safety at all. I speak in reference to the stipulated conditions in the variance, numbers 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7. existing 5-foot masonry fence at the will do nothing to keep the baseballs patio area or shut out the view of the impossible to match a bleached fence and one additional block would give no C. C. 1-23-61 Page Twenty-four ZONE VARIANCE NO. 336 - Continued Mrs. R. J. Hermes - Continued: • Condition No. 3 calls for a minimum of planting of 8-foot trees. We would show you a view from our patio. This is a 12-foot tree of a fast growing type, Alder, planted 4-1/2 years ago. Also, these are the toilets as viewed from the patio area or viewed from out of our patio window. This tree wouldn't stop a ball nor cut down noise nor the unsightliness. Regarding the loudspeaker system. This afternoon I called three loudspeaker firms and the telephone company, and from this I quote, "outdoor loudspeaker system can't be cut below 500 feet audible radius." Our patio is 290 feet from home plate, and the noise is undesirable. The grandstands are 45 to 50 feet from home plate and to whom are we announcing these games? Past experience proves they can't prevent use of this property by others. It is impossible to keep children out of the area, and it is actually a large playground area and is endangering us and being a nuisance. In Item 7 it is indicated that any violation of the foregoing cond- itions are grounds for the revocation of.the variance, but that doesn't stop unsupervised play and who is going to police the area? I have a small child who I have to bring into the house because of these balls going over the fence. They rattle among her toys and it is a constant worry with these balls hitting patio area, dining room area, etc. What right has this use to endanger an area of people who are living in R-l? There are surely other places where these children can play and which have been offered to them in the City. There is proof of this and there should be protection to the people backing up to this open ballpark. Mr. Hermes The statement was made this has 593 Gaybar Street been used one year. I would like to ask the Planning Dir- ector when the precise plan was approved and when a permit was granted for these people to move in here? This should be clarified. Relative to the Precise Plan of Design, as indicated in the Muni- cipal Code, no person shall commence any use for which an unclass- ified use permit is required. This is church property and it requires it for any structure. When was this precise plan approved to install this baseball park, although this has been in a year.. This is important. In rejection of approval in the code, it is indicated that if a proposed precise plan of design should substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use of property, endanger public welfare and safety such a plan should be rejected or modified. We are objecting to baseballs landing in this particular area. The precise plan doesn't include any visible means to stop this. They talk about policing the area, that is all. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Twenty-five ZONE VARIANCE NO. 336 - Continued Mr. Hermes - Continued: There was discussion of a 20-foot fence. I show you a photograph which indicates two stakes attached to this fence, 20 feet in the air, and you can see how it looks from my patio. Relative to variances or unclassified use permit, they are a basic approach to granting variance in West Covina, and these codes are written for individual property owners and not mass groups. In a variance it is indicated that the sole purpose shall be to prevent discrimination and that no variance shall be granted which would give a special privilege not shared by others in the area. There is a back stop here and prior to this use going in the church played ball in this area,.but they played in the other direction and we never had a ball in our yard from this property: In the required showing for variance it is indicated that before any variance may be granted it shall be shown that a special var- iance is necessar1y for the preservation and enjoyment of a sub- stantial property right sustained by the vicinity and zone. In 1944 this was just zoned a recreational area in conjunction with the church and school, and I think that this is where this got off hand. Somebody let Little League in and this was for church recreation only, and the Little League is asking for the change, .not the church, and they are asking for a special change which I think is a public operation. In granting of a variance, it shall not be of material detriment to the general welfare in which the zone is located and shall not effect the comprehensive general plan. Commissioner Laun#er objected to this use on these conditions and felt this request did not comply. The granting of this endangers our property. From home plate is 190 feet then 40 feet with a block fence installed by the church as a requirement of the previous variance. At this point the Little League fence is 19 feet from this block fence. A week ago I received an official Little League magazine. It contains the following and I quote, "Many groups starting organizations and activity should be able to procure plots of land to play in the Spring." The proponents stated they spent $5,000.00 to do this. "Remember all you need is a playing surface, the rest is icing on the cake and can be added as money is available." I am wondering about the people who paid for this. Reference is made that the church had the right to permit this to be put in. We have found balls 100 feet from our line. It was stated that Little Leaguerscouldn't hit balls over the fence and it was outsiders, but yet, here tonight, who is going to police this area? I criticized the loudspeakers and a statement was made the League people had met with me several times last summer to try to do something about it. There is a flag pole there on which it was suggested to place the loudspeakers, but it wasn't done and Mr. Tysson admitted they couldn't tone down a loudspeaker. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Twenty-six ZONE VARIANCE NO. 336 - Continued Mr. Hermes - Continued: At the present time, the.Commission gave`the`League the right to use this area and they must police.it; but,it 'stipulated nothing about the times it could be used during the day. They say they use it from 5:30 to 7:30 or 8 at night and.can't use lights. At 7:10 St. John's played Immanuel Lutheran.church: At 7:14 boys were playing here, not necessarily outsiders. At 6:30 there was playing here which continued to 8. They started playing at 10 on Saturday but came in earlier,.. and started practicing. What are the hours this is to be used and who is to police it when it isn't used. Do we have to call the local police and complain all the time about these boys? On December 21 we had the Planning Commission meeting and last Sat- urday boys were here playing ball. There„are.gates with various entrances but there is nothing done to keep them out.. I think this .thing has been run into the ground. I was told, "this is'Little League, how can you beat them?" I've also -.been told that you can't defeat them and I may not but, at least I have had the right to say what I want to say on this matter. IN REBUTTAL Mr. Ames: I would point out this block wall is from 5-6 to 5-8 already'. That is the natural cement foundation line, natural level of ground is lower so there would have to be nothing done to raise this 6 feet, but:I do agree that a 6-foot wall wouldn't stop a baseball going over it. The only solution is screening in this area'. Another point was in -regard to dimensions: Sbme:are approximately correct but not all. Home plate to here is ,199..E feet.' This 19-1/2 feet which is approximately correct. From home plate to north boundary of his block wall is 224.feet. This 100feet back to the other wall would be 324 feet and there aren't many major leaguers who could hit a ball that far... From home plate to the center of his property is 260 feet, altogether .280 feet. Distance from home .plate to'this'property is 290 feet. There being no further testimony', the hearing was declared closed. Councilman Snyder: The Commission was, agreed that trees would.be better screening than screen. Mr. Joseph: It was a matter.of sight and that:is why the 8-foot minimum was required and be of sucha nature as to prevent balls, from going through.„ Councilman Snyder: It maybe possible to use'the trees to screen the screen instead-S. balls. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Twenty-seven ZONE VARIANCE NO. 336 - Continued Councilman Towner: I understood there was' a proposal to put,a screen in, but I am not y sure where it was to be located. Perhaps this would answer the major difficulty, if there was a screen plus trees. Mr. Ames: We do not'know just where it would go in We have made no. survey'bu.t intend to have an engineer look at it relative to balls going over and how high and where it should be located from home plate. Mayor Heath: Is the League,willing to put in the screen? Councilman Towner: It"is certainly possible that not every ball hit in Little League is from home.plate. There could be 'others hit in the field and so there would be need of a.sub- stantial height of screen and trees.of a substantial type to screen. the screen. Councilman Barnes: The screen was my main concern and screening the property to keep from seeing the screen. I would also like to know how you might posib� place the loudspeakers. so the noise factor wouldn't disturb the,owne s. Mr. Ames: Behind home plate is a back stop which extends 18 to 20 feet in the air. On either corner of it there is a "V" shape in general and two poles on either corner. We intend to put the speakers on top of the poles facing down in each direction directly toward the bleachers. Councilman Brown: Where the Commission asks for the block.wall to be raised to 6 feet, I can't go with that as you definitely change the look for the neighbors in putting on one more block. It is difficult to tell which height you.are talking about and it is close enough to 6 feet and isn't going to hide anything. Possibly a screen of a temporary nature .pulled -,up on block pulleys could eliminate some of the unsightliness. I think, however, this use is worthwhile and good for the children and better than weeds. Councilman Snyder: It wouldn't be protection from the "Tom Sawyer" players.. Councilman Barnes: They would be willing to gate all the entrances and lock them • so all would stay out of the area when it is not in use under proper.supervision. Councilman Towner: Generally., I am in agreement with the recommendations of the Planning Commission except I think that we .should omit Condition No.. 2 relative to.the masonry wall, which the applicant (opponent) indicated isn't satisfactory C. C. 1-23-61 Page Twenty-eight ZONE VARIANCE NO. 336 -.Continued Councilman Towner Continued: to him anyway and accomplish something further -by some kind of high - fence in there and include conditions that this suitable screen fence be provided and subject to approval of Recreation and Parks Director. City Manager Aiassa: Itmightbe advisable to hold this over to the next meeting in the light of the fact that we can look at some of the recommendations Council is making to givelan idea of what it would be when finished. Mayor Heath:- The only proposal is a screen to protect this property and the League,ind.icates it -is willing to do this if it meets with the Recreation and Park Director's approval relative to any criticisms. Councilman Barnes: They state they will plant trees to take away the unsightliness of the screen. City Manager Aiassa: Howelver'...I,do not feel that this should be dumped into the lap of the Park Director. Mayor Heath: Who is better qualified than a man who knows City parks and supervises baseball playing? City Manager Aiassa: You have a property owner that is objecting to baseballs flying into his property and there is the esthetic look and possible provision for a proper barricade to not only protect him but also not to hurt the esthetic look with this barricade. Councilman Brown. - to cover any screen and this year of what you do. If trees are planted,,even if they are 8 feet in height, they .are not going to grow enough it would be unsightly regardless Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and carried, that Variance No. 336 be approved in accordance with the recommendations of the Planning Commission, with the stipulation that Condition 2 be deleted and that some kind of a screen, in addition to hedges, be put in to protect the property owners and gates installed and locked at all times when,not in use. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT ON HOLT AVENUE Recommendation of the Planning NAME CHANGE Commission to change the name. HELD OVER Mayor ' Heath: We have received a recommendation from the Planning Commission that the.name of Holt Avenue be'changed in the City. Today we also have,a notice stating that an additional sign has been placed on the freeway blocking out the name "Pomona". and installing the name "West Covina" in our area. C•. C .' 1-23-61 Page Twenty-nine REPORT ON HOLT AVENUE NAME CHANGE_- Continued Councilman Brown: If the name is not necessary to be changed, I think it would be better for all people concerned and we can see how it works out for now. Mayor Heath: I would agreewith that. However,, there is something that should be considered and that is with the recommendation for a name change it is indicated that the people in the area are desirous of having the name changed. City Manager Aiassa: The Engineering Staff made a field survey of the people in the area to get their feelings about this and the result of the tabulation is their general thinking. Councilman Snyder. I think it was the general feeling of the Commission to try this for a year, but that it would amount to nothing but having to change it anyway in a year. It isn't exactly accurate as it is named. Councilman Barnes. next meeting if we want to discuss Councilman Snyder: going to get that you do not have I do not feel that it is this urgent to change it. I think we should hold it over to the it. What would you want to hold it over for? I do not know of any additional information you are here already. It was the consensus this be held over but Councilman Snyder stated he was not in favor of holding it over as he saw no reason to do so. CITY MANAGER REPORTS APPROVED METHODS OF FINANCING PROJECT C-95 STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITH PROPERTY OWNERS City Manager Aiassa: This pro- posal was submitted to the Council relative to methods of financing street improvements with property owners and it was suggested the 1911 Act be proposed for this. However, I think this item could be held over to see this area in the field if it is desired. This is Francisquito Avenue to Delvale on.Sunset Avenue. We should do more of these under the 1911 Act and catch these voids that we have through the City and get as many parcels as possible together so it will be cheaper. The City will M924.89. rticipate in this in the amount of $5,925.44 and property owners Councilman Barnes: Is money available in the budget? City Manager Aiassa: I believe this was budgeted. Mr. Dosh: A certain amount was budgeted. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Thirty FINANCING STREET IMPROVEMENTS - Continued City Manager Aiassa: We did a school site that was also a problem when they had three sides with streets to . improve. We are spending a sizeable amount of money here, but there is a petition on file and limited to number of parcels involved, and if we go into a 1911 Act and spread it against five parcels it is a real burden on the property owners. Mayor Heath: Take money for frontage of Del Norte Park. It would be an asset to have curbs and gutters put in. City Manager Aiassa: The petition on hand is a request by property owners. It is our responsibility to acknowledge this to these people whether we would participate under Street and Highway Code, Section 2804. Councilman Brown: City Manager Aiassa: Councilman Barnes. - Mayor Heath: Councilman Towner: by this and that is the pending of greater take on gas tax funds. Hold it over for explanation as to why City's cost is double that of property owners. We are putting most of the street improvements in. Was this an agreement of the old Council at the time a portion to the north was put in, that this would be done? Hold this over for study. I think we should hold it over and I have another item in mind that was brought to my attention possible legislation giving cities City Manager Aiassa: If you go into the 1911 Act it would be advisable to do as much as possible on numerous streets or take areas that are adjacent to each other because then the initial cost would be spread out among a larger number of partici- pants. It was the consensus this matter be held for study. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD City Manager Aiassa: This is for CONTROL BRIDGE BETTERMENT acquisition of right-of-way for AGREEMENT the development of the Service Avenue bridge, three parcels are involved which belong to Mr. French, Mr. Sugar and the American -Japanese Association. There is a dead -line for filing for right-of-way with the Los Angeles Flood Control, February 10, 1961. 0 • C. C. 1-23-61 Page Thirty-one LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL BRIDGE BETTERMENT AGREEMENT - Cont°d. City Manager Aiassa - Continued: We have photographs of the buildings and improvements involved. You can authorize the City Attorney and the City Manager to proceed with condemnation with a resolution that can be introduced by Mr. Williams and we can immediately negotiate with the property owners. There is, already, a fee appraisal prepared by Mr. Cox on the three parcels involved and we can talk to these owners voluntarily and recommend the valuation and if this fails we would probably direct the City Attorney to proceed on direct condemnation of the property. This right-of-way has to be acquired before the time of bid award in order to construct bridge and channel improvements. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 Finding and determining public interest and necessity require acquisition and con- struction of public improvements ADOPTED Mayor Heath: The City Attorney presented: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION AND CON- STRUCTION BY THE CITY OF WEST COVINA OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY IS NECESSARY THEREFOR; AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION OF SAID PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN AND THE IMMEDIATE POSSESSION THEREOF." Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resoluticn. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2014. TREASURER'S REPORT Motion by Councilman Snyder, DECEMBER, 196o seconded by Councilman Barnes, and carried, that the Treasurer's Report for December, 1960, be received and filed. ADDITIONAL POST OFFICE Council received copies of this PARKING report. Action is being obtained on this parking problem and the Regional Engineer of U. S. Post Office came to West Covina to discuss this matter and looked it over and came to the conclusion that relief was needed and indicated he would favor- ably recommend immediate action. Congressman Rousselot made numer- ous calls to the Post Office Department and it was indicated there • [7 C. C. 1-23-61 Page Thirty-two ADDITIONAL POST OFFICE PARKING - Continued would be a 30-foot strip either purchased or leased for additional parking adjacent to the post office. However, it was felt that a 40-foot strip would be more adequate and it is hoped the Department can be pursuaded to permit the 40-foot strip. WILTON & BECKETT Formally withdrawn from the ASSOCIATE ARCHITECTS group as possible architects candidates relative to the design and planning of the Civic Center. MEETINGS Joint.meeting with the Planning Commission on January 26th and meeting of various City groups with Mr. Eisner and staff on February 8. GROUNDBREAKING CEREMONY FOR February 13, 1960, at .the QUEEN OF THE VALLEY HOSPITAL South Hills Country Club. OXBOW FILL AREA City Manager Aiassa stated that the City now has all the encroachment permits that are necessary, from the adjoining property owners, and that Mr. Dosh had done a very excellent job on this matter. SUNSET AVENUE BRIDGE - SANITATION DISTRICT SYPHON There had been matching funds for only realized a saving of City Manager Aiassa indicated that there had been a saving between the City and County Road Department of $6,000.00. with the County and the City there- 50% or $3,000.00. It was further stated that the staff should be congratulated on this. CITY ATTORNEY ORDINANCE NO. 691 An ordinance relating to signs and advertising structures ADOPTED The City Attorney.presented: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SIGNS AND ADVERTISING STRUCTURES." Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, and carried, that further reading of the body of the ordinance be waived. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, that said ordinance be adopted. 'Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said ordinance was given No. 691. C. C. 1-23-61 RESOLUTION NO. 2015 Amending a portion of the master plan of streets and highways ADOPTED Mayor Heath: Page Thirty-three The City Attorney presented: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMENDING A PORTION OF THE MASTER PLAN OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS RELATING TO THE ALIGN - MEND OF MERCED AVENUE EAST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH GLENDORA AVENUE." Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Barnes, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2015. RESOLUTION NO. 2016 Denying a request for a zone change and approval of Precise Plan ADOPTED Mayor Heath: The City Attorney presented: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA DENYING A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE AND DENYING APPROVAL OF A PRECISE PLAN." (Beattie -Miller) Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2016. RESOLUTION NO. 2017 Amending Resolution No. 1693 ADOPTED Mayor Heath: The City Attorney presented: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1693." Hearing no objections, we will waive further reading of the body of the resolution. Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, that said resolution be adopted. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None Said resolution was given No. 2017. (The City Attorney suggested this resolution be recorded in the County Recorder's office.) C. C. 1-23-61 RECREATION AND PARKS Page Thirty-four AMERICAN LITTLE LEAGUE Motion by Councilman Brown, CONCESSION STAND AT seconded .by Councilman Snyder, • CORTEZ PARK APPROVED and carried,that the _American Little League be permitted to construct and operate the con- cession stand'at Cortez Park subject to the stipulation that the City remove the existing stand debris after all usable parts have been taken out and that the building fee be waived. DIRECTIVE FOR PARK STUDY Motion by Councilman Snyder,. seconded by Councilman Brown, and carried,.that the Recreation and Parks Commission be directed to study and prepare a precise plan on all the City parks, including all the additional property in Cortez Park. BOND ISSUE FOR PARKS REPRESENTATIVE TO COUNCIL MEETINGS Council meetings in the future. Joint study with Council to review items included in the bond issue. Mrs. Roberta.Blood stated that the Recreation and Parks Com- mission will have a representa- tive from,the Commission at ZONE CHANGE NO. 171 Mr. Casler,'one of the applicants in this zoning case,, stated that he understood this had.been denied by the Council due to the fact that Council desired,to know what the experts would say on this area before changing the zone. He indicated that rather than go through.the same expense of a new hearing with the Council and Commission, he wondered if the matter could be held over say for two months, or longer, if necessary, and there might be some idea by then how this area would or should be zoned. Mayor Heath stated that he had posed this question, but that the majority of the Council had desired to take action denying the matter. Councilman Brown indicated that when there was a public hearing on the whole City, C-1 could then be requested on that. City Attorney Williams indicated that he did not, however, think this Eisner program is likely to result in the adoption of a new over all zoning map as in the adoption of the ordinance.and doubted if there would be the opportunity:to do as suggested,' although Council could initiate zoning. City Manager Aiassa stated that the general plan will take in streets which would have a major bearing on zoning. Councilman Snyder stated that this isn!t the only reason this matter was denied, to wait for the opinion of experts, but other factors. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Thirty-five ZONE CHANGE NO. 171 - Continued Councilman Brown indicated that there would probably be new evidence anyway and a public hearing would have to be held, regardless. . Councilman Towner stated that the only gain in not adopting a resolution to deny this would be possibly not to have another fee and go through a hearing. City Manager Aiassa indicated that if fee is the concern of Council, they could initiate the hearing and include more than one parcel at no cost to the applicants. However, Councilman Snyder stated that to hold this over seems to indicate a half -way promise Council might give this zoning to him, which Council can't do. It was felt that nothing would be gained to hold this matter over and that the action taken is final and that Council doesn't desire to hold it over because of the fact that if that was done and at a later date there would be additional testimony there would have to be public hearing anyway. MAYOR'S REPORT MEETING WITH UPPER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT INVITATION TO LUNCHEON LA PUENTE ANNEXATION is generally nice and we would wish with it. COMPLAINT RELATIVE TO TEN DAY APPEAL Mr. Joseph indicated that all necessary notices are leaving at least ten more February 17, 1961. City of Pomona, January 25, 1960 in honor of retiring Assemblyman Mr. E. Geddes. Mayor Heath indicated he had been to the area and looked at the buildings. The area La Puente all kinds of luck Mayor Heath indicated that a complaint had been received regarding.insufficient time allowed for appeals.. twenty days was allowed and usually sent out before the first ten days days to appeal. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Councilman Brown: The East San Gabriel Valley • Planning Committee met in Glendora recently and the main discussion was major routes north and south that could be used for truck routes. The Engineering Association of this group has this under study, as well as the Regional Planning Commission. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Thirty-six Councilman Towner: Legislation is pending to increase revenues available for local streets and highway both County and City, and a communication from the League of Cal- ifornia Cities outlines the general proposals involved. • I think what we, as a City, should do is publicize the deficiencies in the City made by the City under SCR 52 and it might be possible to get representatives from the newspapers and civic organizations to tour the areas of deficiencies as to advise them further as to the needs. Mr. Cameron and Mr. Richards are aware of these needs and a suggestion is that we determine the extent of our inability to meet these needs out of current revenue and whether we need this additional revenue. I would like to see this program implemented and I think it is most important to the City's street and highway system. Mayor Heath: Mr. Bonelli spoke at Santa Anita and pointed out the number of cities that had adopted the resolution concerning the five -eighths of a cent on gasoline tax.. It is realized by the Board of Supervisors that action taken by these 40 out of 70 cities should be held off because there are three actions pending before the legislature in 1961,1) the Mayo -Breed Formula where the percentage of money going to north and to the south be possibly adjusted more equally, 2) increase of gas tax one -cent and 3) increase of "in -lieu" tax on automobiles. One cent would be used for City and County roads. It was stated that if all three of these failed and we wanted to take another look at this five -eighths of a cent the Board of Supervisors would be forced to go along and make an adjustment, but he did definitely recommend and strongly propose any change that would be made would be over a five year period. It was an excellent report and worthwhile looking into. He also cautioned us to study Governor Brown's committee report which has to do with over all metropolitan areas, and I think we should get a copy of this. Councilman Barnes: I would like to stress regarding Water District meetings that the Council wanted to meet with the representatives of the two water districts. Council would have a good opportunity to do so if they would attend the meeting designated for February 17, in order to find out exactly what they want to know on this matter. I would also like the City Manager to attend this meeting. The State Engineer will be there, along with Mr. Harvey Banks, and I think that at this meeting all our questions could be answered. . DEMANDS APPROVED Motion by Councilman Towner, seconded by Councilman Brown, that Demands in the amount of $137,295.92, as shown on Demand Sheets C-240 through C-242 and B-69 be ap roved. This total includes fund transfers in the amount of 92,187.96. Motion passed on roll call as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Towner, Barnes, Snyder, Mayor Heath Noes: None Absent: None • C. C. 1-23-61 COMMENTS OF MRS. VAN DAME: Page Thirty-seven I still am of the opinion that there should be two officers on the cars at night from 8 P. M. because of what is happening everywhere. You are negotiating with the M.T.A, about transportation, and I do not feel there is anyone on the Council that is qualified to go into that because you do not ride the buses and never have ridden the buses. I have done so for 15 years, every day of the week, -and I was the one that got the buses to come down from San Bernardino Road. When I first came to West Covina,, we had to go to Baldwin Park to get to Los Angeles by bus, so I contacted the neighbors about buses on Garvey and was told there wasn't any. People had sent in petitions and done everything, with no results. I saw Mr. Smith and told him about the situation, and he stated that he would see about it. In time I received a letter stating that the first bus would come down San Bernardino Road in July. I was also instrumental in getting. different schedules and I have schedules from 1914 and we have never gotten any better service now than we had ten or fifteen years ago. They do not have correct bus schedules and that is why there are so many cars on the roads in West Covina. Mayor Heath: Are you talking about schedules or the M.T.A. plan for an over- head rail? Mrs. Van Dame: I do not mean the overhead rail, but to give the people what they should have, now. I also do not think that the buses belong on the freeway, but on the service road where they can really give service. They have never done a thing ever since West Covina was subdivided. The schedule is just the same whether M.T.A. or P. E. Mayor Heath: We can check into this as to whether the people riding the buses are satisfied with the .scheduling or not. Mrs. Van Dame: They are not. Mayor Heath: If people aren't satisfied with the schedule, they could notify the City Manager for the record because we need something to present to the M. T. A. Mrs. Van Dame: go to these meetings, but them. I would like to go. City Manager Aiassa: I offered, once, to go out on this matter, but Mr. Petrie said it wouldn't be right if I I know you will never get anywhere with representative and could notify you We are having a meeting with a representative from M.T.A. and the Chamber of Commerce of the date of.the meeting. C. C. 1-23-61 Page Thirty-eight COMMENTS OF MRS. VAN DAME - Continued Councilman Snyder: Perhaps the public should be appraised of the meeting so other people would go to the preliminary meeting and then public meeting. City Manager Aiassa: There has been some action started on Route 39, Azusa Avenue south to go over the hill. I am wondering if Council has any plans on getting action to start to activate this project? Also, consideration from Council to start including some preliminary improvement plans for Cameron Avenue Extension. We could have Mr. Johnson run some preliminary right-of-way requirements and improvement cost estimates. There being no further business, motion by Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Towner, and carried, that the meeting be adjourned at 12:01 A. M. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED' /E /y G/ Mayor